Ovni Marne - Un Dossier

Magazine Overview

This issue of OVNI magazine, published by association OVNI MARNE, focuses on the historical context and various hypotheses surrounding Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs). The cover highlights a "burning dossier" of "10 Hypotheses" and poses the question "What are UFOs?", with a historical overview from 1947 to 1952.

Contents

The table of contents reveals several key sections:

• OVNI: 10 Hypotheses (Pages 1-2-3-4): This section explores ten different theories attempting to explain the UFO phenomenon.
• Que sont les OVNI ? (What are UFOs?) (Pages 5-6-7-8-9-10-1): This appears to be the main investigative section, defining UFOs and discussing their characteristics and observers.
• HYSTORIQUE : 1947 a 1952 (History: 1947 to 1952) (Pages 12-13): A chronological look at significant UFO events during this period.
• TEMOIGNAGES DE L'ANTIQUITE (Testimonies from Antiquity) (Page 14): Explores ancient accounts that might relate to UFOs.
• IL FUT LE TOUT PREMIER OBSERVATEUR (He was the very first observer) (Page 15): Likely a profile of an early witness or researcher.

The magazine's editorial stance is that information comes from the internet, and the responsibility for published texts lies with the authors. The publication does not necessarily endorse all terms or content.

OVNI: 10 Hypotheses

This section, attributed to ufologists from Bordeaux (GEPRA and CREPS), attempts to categorize UFO phenomena into ten hypotheses. The challenge of interpreting these hypotheses for online dissemination is noted. Each hypothesis is presented with associated information, aiming for the highest probability of correctness.

Dossier X-H1: Extraterrestrial Hypothesis

This hypothesis aligns with the scientific consensus that the universe is vast enough to host other civilizations, possibly more advanced than ours. It references theories like Jean-Pierre Petit's on MHD and spacetime shortcuts, suggesting distance is not a barrier. It posits the eternal presence of Extraterrestrials (ETs), surveillance of Earth by EBEs (Extraterrestrial Biological Entities), the manifestation of multiple alien races, and the possibility that some ETs are less evolved or fleeing catastrophes. The absence of official contact is explained by humanity not being ready. Questions are raised about potential ET presence on the Moon and Mars.

Dossier X-H2: Other Dimensions

This hypothesis suggests creatures from parallel dimensions, some benevolent, others not. It offers possible explanations for cases like the Venusians described by Adamski and proposes the existence of Earthlings from other dimensions, as well as time travel.

Dossier X-H3: Intra-Terrestrial Hypothesis

This theory proposes civilizations living underground or underwater, referencing concepts like Aggartha, Atlantis, Mu, and the Great Flood. It also connects to Hindu Vedas, Upanishads, the Palenque Tablet, and ancient impossibilities described by Daniken, with Professor Demarcq's study of 'Paraterrestrials'.

Dossier X-H4: Ultra Top Secret

This hypothesis claims governments are hiding the truth about UFOs, using secret defense funds for experimental purposes. It points to the manifestation of unknown high technology, the 'flying saucers of the Third Reich', and intelligence agency manipulations. It also mentions experiences conducted under the guise of UFO investigations, such as cattle mutilations, abductions, genetic experiments, and implant placements, as well as cloning. Informants from the CIA are mentioned, along with concepts like 'little green men', 'tall blondes', and underground bases. It references the Roswell incident as a deliberate attempt to create a narrative about EBEs, the NASA Blue Beam Project using holograms, and a correlation with globalism and Big Brother surveillance.

Dossier X-H5: Manifestation of Divine Beings

This hypothesis suggests a celestial world in opposition to the terrestrial world, with a war in the heavens and its consequences for humanity. It references texts like Urantia, the Bible (Ezekiel, Moses, Enoch, Melchizedec), Marian apparitions as a counterpoint to UFOs, and occult manipulation of our world linked to '6.6.6.' and the Antichrist principle, with predictions of encounters by psychics.

Dossier X-H6: Collective Unconscious

This hypothesis links ufology to old science fiction texts (B. Méheust's study) and suggests that UFO witnesses describe pre-technologies that will appear officially years later. It notes that media influences public opinion. Further reading is suggested on theories about 'form waves' (accelerated crystal evolution) and parallel animal evolutions.

Dossier X-H7: Natural Phenomena (Some Unknown)

This hypothesis considers UFOs as natural phenomena, including meteorological events, meteors, magnetic interference (as reported in Science&Vie), and visual and electromagnetic pollution from satellites like Iridium.

Dossier X-H8: Ufological Folklore and the Past

This hypothesis delves into folklore, including Animism, Paracelsus's theory of gnomes, manifestations of the devil in the Middle Ages, and 20th-century abductions. Key references include Jacques Vallée (Magonia) and Jean Sider.

Dossier X-H9: Lucrative Intoxication

This hypothesis suggests that ufology is fueled by charlatans who profit from the phenomenon by adding artificial information. It claims private interests divert funds using ufology, citing Project SETI as an example, and notes the emergence of sects enriching themselves at the expense of ETs.

Dossier X-H10: The World of Illusions

This hypothesis references Eastern philosophies and religions, suggesting the world is illusory and that the observer affects observation. It points to discrepancies in testimonies for the same apparition, with some seeing and others not, and mentions spontaneous generation of UFOs by yogis.

What are UFOs?

UFOs are defined as Unidentified Flying Objects, but their true nature remains unknown. Ufologists propose various theories, but without laboratory examination, these remain intellectual speculations. A UFO is characterized by an observed object or light whose aspect, trajectory, actions, movements, lights, and colors lack logical, conventional, or natural explanation, even after examination by witnesses, scientists, or technical experts.

Who Observes UFOs?

Anyone can observe UFOs, regardless of age, wealth, or education. Many observers do not actively seek them. People in small towns or rural areas, especially those outdoors late at night, have a higher chance of observation. While many CUFOS members haven't personally seen a UFO, some trace their interest back to childhood observations.

What do UFOs look like? How fast do they move? Can I photograph them?

UFOs vary in size and shape, from small lights (Nocturnal Lights - LN) to disc or saucer-shaped objects (Diurnal Lights - LD). Close encounters are categorized into three types (RR1, RR2, RR3), with abductions sometimes referred to as RR4. Witnesses describe shapes like saucers, boomerangs, spheres, diamonds, cigars, and triangles, often with vivid lights. Their speed varies greatly, from silent hovering to instantaneous high-speed departures and incredible maneuvers. The propulsion method remains unknown.

Authentic UFO photographs are rare. Many are natural phenomena, camera artifacts, or deliberate hoaxes. Notable photographs were taken in McMinville (1950), Rouen (1954), off the coast of Brazil (1958), and Lubbock (1951). Video recordings also exist. However, photographs are not considered sufficient proof due to the ease of manipulation.

When were UFOs first seen?

Ufologists believe UFOs have been observed throughout history. Modern focus often starts with the late 19th century, particularly the 1890s sightings of dirigible-like craft in North America. During WWII, pilots reported 'foo-fighters', luminous fireballs initially attributed to secret German weapons but later observed by German pilots as well.

The 'phantom rockets' observed over Sweden and Norway in 1946 are also discussed, with a significant portion remaining unexplained by natural phenomena or known aircraft.

The modern era of UFOs is often considered to have begun on June 24, 1947, with Kenneth Arnold's sighting of nine crescent-shaped objects, which led to the term 'flying saucer' due to his description of their movement like a saucer skipping on water.

How to recognize a UFO hoax?

Less than 1% of UFO reports are classified as hoaxes. Investigators identify them by examining witness credibility, report details, and physical evidence. Common hoaxes involve balloons with flares. Investigators look for inconsistencies, unbelievable claims, and signs of tampering. Witness reliability is assessed by interviewing associates. Photos are scrutinized for signs of manipulation, such as differences in focus or visible support structures.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine presents a wide array of hypotheses for UFO phenomena, ranging from extraterrestrial and interdimensional origins to psychological and natural explanations. There's a strong emphasis on historical sightings, particularly from the mid-20th century, and a critical examination of potential hoaxes and misidentifications. The editorial stance acknowledges the internet as a source of information and places responsibility on the authors, suggesting a degree of neutrality or a focus on presenting diverse viewpoints rather than endorsing a single theory. The recurring theme is the persistent mystery surrounding UFOs and the ongoing efforts to understand them through various investigative lenses.

This issue of "Phénomèna," subtitled "la revue des phénomènes OVNI" (the review of UFO phenomena), published in October 1996, focuses on understanding what UFOs are, the nature of extraterrestrials, and the history and government involvement in UFO research. The magazine emphasizes critical examination of evidence and maintaining a critical spirit when investigating extraordinary claims.

What are UFOs?

The article "Que sont les OVNI?" (What are UFOs?) begins by stressing the importance of examining evidence critically. It introduces the concept of an "Objet Volant Identifié" (OVI), or Identified Flying Object, which accounts for 90-95% of reported sightings. These are often misidentified natural phenomena (like Venus or stars affected by atmospheric turbulence) or man-made objects (like advertising planes). The text notes a significant decrease in UFO sightings in recent years and poses questions about the reasons behind this decline, whether it's due to increased psychological health, better identification, or rarer natural phenomena.

What do Extraterrestrials look like? Where do they come from?

This section explores the appearance and potential origins of extraterrestrials. It acknowledges that not all UFOs are necessarily spacecraft piloted by intelligent beings. Descriptions of extraterrestrials vary greatly. Some are described as "Nordics" who resemble people from Northern Europe and could easily blend into crowds. Others are depicted as small "Greys" with large, almond-shaped eyes and disproportionately large heads. Some reports even mention robot-like or android-like creatures. Theories about their origin include other planets, different dimensions, or even being time travelers from humanity's future. The case of Betty and Barney Hill's 1961 abduction is highlighted as a key piece of evidence, particularly the star map Betty Hill drew under hypnosis, which was later compared by Marjorie Fish to star charts, suggesting a possible origin from the Zeta Reticuli star system.

Have people been injured by UFOs?

This section details instances where individuals reported experiencing pain or injury after UFO encounters or abductions. Physical effects mentioned include eye irritation, sunburn-like symptoms, cuts, and nausea. Post-encounter psychological effects can include nightmares and anxiety. A famous case involves Betty Cash and Vicky Landrum in Texas in December 1980, who encountered a brilliant diamond-shaped object emitting intense heat and flames. They later developed severe burns, nausea, and diarrhea, attributed to radiation. Their lawsuit against the US government, identifying helicopters as military Chinooks, was unsuccessful.

Is the US government studying UFOs?

The article discusses the US government's involvement in studying UFOs. While not officially involved in public studies, there is evidence of continued secret interest. The US Air Force (USAF) was responsible for organizing projects to study UFO reports between 1947 and 1969, the most famous being "Project Blue Book." Despite numerous reports, the USAF consistently stated that UFOs did not exist. However, the military considered UFO reports seriously if they could be used to deceive intelligence or communication systems, making America vulnerable. Experts admitted the possibility of the Soviet Union developing advanced technologies, leading the Air Force to conclude that UFO reports needed to be studied until these threats diminished. The USAF explained many sightings as natural phenomena or conventional aircraft, but hundreds remained unexplained.

In 1966, a wave of UFO sightings led to political pressure for explanations. A congressional commission was formed, and the USAF collaborated with the University of Colorado on a study led by Professor Edward U. Condon. Despite controversies and accusations of bias against Condon, the "Condon Report" concluded that 21 years of UFO studies had yielded no scientific knowledge and that further research was unjustified. Many disagreed, stating the report did not align with the study's data. Nevertheless, the USAF used the report's conclusion to abandon Project Blue Book in 1969.

Despite the suppression, many ufologists believe the government retains important UFO files and conducts secret research, citing declassified documents classified as "Top Secret." Attempts by ufologists to access these documents through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) have been largely unsuccessful, with the government citing national security concerns. The group "Ground Saucer Watch" and later "CAUS" (Citizens Against UFO Secrecy) pursued legal action to obtain documents related to UFO sightings near military bases, but faced resistance and financial difficulties, with a federal judge ruling in favor of the government.

Historical Sightings

The "Historique 1947 à 1957" section presents a timeline of notable UFO events:

• 1947: William Rhodes photographed a circular object in Arizona.
• 1948: Aviator Thomas Mantell died in flight while pursuing a UFO in Kentucky.
• 1950: A UFO was photographed in Oregon, resembling one seen in Rouen in March 1954. Another flying saucer was photographed in Red Bull, Illinois, by Dean Morgan.
• 1951: Three UFOs were photographed in New Jersey in front of two witnesses.
• 1952: On July 19, the radar at Washington National Airport detected eight UFOs.

Another section, "Des témoignages existent depuis l'antiquité !" (Testimonies exist since antiquity!), highlights older accounts:

• 22 (Egypt): About a hundred witnesses saw a circle of fire land and depart.
• 60 (Scotland): King Domnall Mac Murchada witnessed a large luminous object.
• 919 (Hungary): Multiple luminous objects appeared in the sky for several weeks.
• 966 (Sea of Japan): A merchant crew reported a luminous cylinder crossing the sky at high speed.
• 1015 (Tokyo): Two luminous objects illuminated the streets, followed by several smaller white objects.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine "Phénomèna" positions itself as a review that offers a "new and incisive look" at UFO phenomena, without dogma. It aims to provide rapid, precise, and synthesized information on facts and events. The publication highlights its role in publishing controversial material, such as complete photos of a supposed alien autopsy film and the full transcript of a pilot/control tower exchange during a presumed UFO interception by Belgian F16s. The editorial stance encourages readers to subscribe to stay informed about unique sources of information, emphasizing that the magazine is available for purchase but no free specimens are sent. The overall tone suggests a serious, investigative approach to the UFO phenomenon, acknowledging its complexity and the ongoing debate surrounding it.