Ouranos - Nouvelle Serie - no 01 - 1974

Magazine Overview

Title: OURANOS
Issue: 1 (Special Issue)
Date: July 27, 1974
Publisher: Union Internationale de groupements privés
Country: France
Language: French

This special issue of OURANOS, a documentary and informational review on Unidentified Flying Objects and related phenomena, is edited by an international union of private groups. It is presented as a documentary synthesis of research undertaken by the GABRIEL team.

Editorial Stance

The editorial, penned by Pierre Delval, states the magazine's ambition to serve the truth and seek positive explanations for phenomena observed in the sky. It criticizes pure skepticism and systematic negation, highlighting the 'flying saucer' problem as one of humanity's most important challenges. The editorial emphasizes that the phenomenon of UFOs is complex and has evolved, suggesting that UFOs may adapt their appearance based on human understanding and that their presence might not be accidental.

Part 1: LA PARALYSIE (The Paralysis)

This section, a provisional synthesis of research by the GABRIEL team, delves into the phenomenon of 'paralysis' experienced by witnesses during UFO encounters. The research took five years to yield what the authors describe as 'quasi-proofs'. The study focuses on cases in France, aiming to provide a foundation for further research and to encourage other researchers to contribute.

Methodology and Scope

The GABRIEL team has compiled a catalog of 'paralysis' cases, primarily from France, due to the availability of information and the possibility of re-investigation. They emphasize the need for detailed accounts of how these events unfolded, beyond simple statements of being 'paralyzed'. The research aims to understand the nature of the phenomenon and to develop a working hypothesis.

Catalog of 'Paralysis' Cases

The issue presents 25 detailed cases of 'paralysis', mostly occurring in 1954. These accounts describe witnesses being immobilized, often by a light or beam emitted from a UFO or by the presence of its occupants. The cases include:

• 1954, Côte d'Azur: A witness observed a lenticular craft and two humanoids. A beam of light caused paralysis.
• 1954, Quarouble (Nord): Marius Dewilde was paralyzed by a green light from a craft after seeing two small beings.
• 1954, Cénon (Vienne): Yves David experienced 'electric tingling' and paralysis while observing a dark craft and a small being.
• 1954, Bouzais (Cher): Mercier felt completely paralyzed upon seeing a luminous mass descend.
• 1954, Marcilly-sur-Vienne (Indre-et-Loire): Georges Gatey became paralyzed while observing a small being in a suit next to a floating machine.
• 1954, Coulommiers (Seine-et-Marne): Bernard Goujon was stopped mid-run, experiencing tingling and blurred vision, indicating paralysis. Three landing traces were found.
• 1954, Beaumont (Puy-de-Dôme): Witnesses felt paralyzed and experienced malaise from a luminous ball.
• 1954, La Fère (Aisne): Military personnel were immobilized by a mysterious force from a luminous craft.
• 1954, East of Le Mans (Sarthe): Renault workers experienced paralysis from a green light.
• 1954, Monteux (Vaucluse): René Margaillan felt paralyzed while observing a phosphorescent craft.

Other cases include incidents in Barre-des-Cévennes (1956), Pertuis (1963), Valensole (1965), and various locations in 1954, 1967, and 1970.

Analysis of Circumstances

The analysis of the 25 cases reveals several patterns:

• Temporality: A significant proportion of the 'paralysis' cases occurred in 1954, suggesting a wave of such phenomena during that year.
• Geography: Many cases are located along a specific geographical line (BAVIC), though later cases fall below it.
• Time of Day: While UFO sightings are often associated with twilight, 'paralysis' cases do not show a strong concentration within specific hours.
• Witnesses: All witnesses who experienced 'paralysis' were male. The authors question whether fear is the cause, as women are generally considered more sensitive.
• Distance: The 'paralysis' phenomenon is not consistently correlated with proximity to the object, suggesting it's not simply a defensive measure against close approach.

The authors conclude that 'paralysis' is a motivated action, likely caused by an unknown stimulus, and not solely attributable to fear.

Part 2: LE MIMÉTISME (Mimicry)

This section, though less detailed in the provided text, is presented as the second part of the special issue. It is described as an extension of research into 'mimicry', potentially related to how UFOs or their occupants might disguise themselves or interact in ways that mimic familiar forms.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout this issue is the detailed investigation of unusual phenomena associated with UFOs, specifically 'paralysis' and 'mimicry'. The editorial stance is one of open-minded inquiry, seeking factual explanations rather than dismissing phenomena outright. The magazine aims to compile evidence, analyze patterns, and encourage further research in the field of ufology. The GABRIEL team and the magazine's collaborators are presented as dedicated researchers working to understand these complex and often baffling events.

This issue of OURANOS, identified as N300 and dated October 23, 1954, published by Centre-Matin, delves deeply into the phenomenon of 'paralysis' experienced by witnesses of unidentified flying objects (UFOs), referred to as 'Soucoupes Volantes'. The magazine explores the nature of this paralysis, its potential causes, and its implications, while also touching upon esotericism and ancient Egyptian themes.

Analysis of the Phenomenon: 'Paralysis'

The core of the issue is dedicated to analyzing the 'paralysis' phenomenon. The authors categorize these events into two main types: 'brutal' and 'progressive' paralyses. Brutal paralysis strikes suddenly and completely immobilizes the witness, often mid-action. Progressive paralysis allows the witness to complete their current action but then immobilizes them. The magazine posits that these paralyses might be caused by intense radiation from a directed beam or a protective field emanating from the UFO.

Secondary phenomena associated with paralysis are also discussed, including tingling, electric shocks, and the peculiar effect of immobilizing vehicle engines and extinguishing headlights. Several specific cases are detailed, such as the incident in Pouzou (Charente) on October 21, 1954, where a man and his son experienced tingling, their car stalled, and headlights went out as a dark object took off. Another case from Prémanon (Jura) on September 27, 1954, describes a young boy being thrown to the ground by a cold force while observing a strange object.

The publication emphasizes that these paralyses rarely leave lasting physical sequels, though some witnesses reported temporary physiological disturbances like sleep or appetite issues.

Neurological and Physiological Explanations

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to exploring the neurological underpinnings of this phenomenon. It introduces the basics of the human nervous system, including muscles, nerves, the brain (cerebrum, cerebellum, brainstem), and the autonomic nervous system (orthosympathetic and parasympathetic). The authors propose that the 'paralysis' is not a true muscular or nerve block but rather an inhibition of voluntary motor control originating from a specific area of the brain, likely the somatomotor cortex located in the frontal lobe along the Rolandic fissure.

They argue that vital functions like heartbeat and respiration remain unaffected, and that certain muscles, like those controlling eyelids and eye movement, continue to function, suggesting a highly selective effect. The magazine even presents a diagram illustrating the 'geography' of the left cerebral hemisphere and highlighting the potentially affected areas.

The authors suggest that UFO occupants might possess the ability to directly influence or 'paralyze' specific brain centers, thereby controlling voluntary actions. This could explain why witnesses, even when 'paralyzed', might still be able to observe or even move their heads, while their primary motor functions are inhibited.

Broader Implications and Speculations

The issue extends its analysis to other potential effects of UFO technology on human consciousness. It discusses cases where witnesses experienced a loss of spatial awareness or a feeling of their mind being 'empty,' suggesting that UFOs might be capable of manipulating perception and even memory. The possibility of 'brain projections' or simulated experiences is raised, making it difficult to distinguish between genuine sightings and fabricated ones.

Furthermore, the magazine touches upon the idea of 'legitimate defense' and 'pre-emptive strikes' as potential reasons for the paralysis, suggesting that witnesses might be immobilized if they pose a threat or approach too closely to the UFO or its occupants.

Esotericism and Egyptian Themes

Beyond the UFO phenomenon, the magazine includes a section on 'NEBULHATHOR ESOTERISME DE L'EGYPTE,' presented by Edmond Panet. This section explores ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs, Theosophy, cosmogenesis, and anthropogenesis, suggesting a connection between these ancient mysteries and the broader study of the unknown. It also mentions travels through Egypt, the Nile, the Tunisian desert, and historical Roman sites, concluding with a recommendation for Edmond Panet's book, available in different formats.

Book and Product Listings

The issue concludes with several pages of advertisements and listings for books related to UFOs, magnetism, occultism, and other esoteric subjects. It also promotes an 'insigne en métal' (metal badge) featuring a UFO design and a 'Carte du ciel' (Map of the sky) product.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the phenomenon of 'paralysis' associated with UFO encounters, its potential neurological and physiological explanations, and the broader implications for human consciousness and perception. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious investigation into these phenomena, attempting to find rational, albeit sometimes speculative, explanations based on scientific principles and witness testimonies. There is a clear emphasis on the potential technological capabilities of UFO occupants to influence human minds and bodies. The inclusion of esoteric and ancient Egyptian topics suggests a belief in interconnectedness between different forms of unexplained phenomena and ancient wisdom.

This issue of the magazine, identified by its cover headline 'LE MIMÉTISME OU L'ART DE PASSER INAPERÇU!' (Mimicry or The Art of Going Unnoticed!), explores the intriguing phenomenon of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and their potential methods of concealment. The article, authored by G.A.B.R.I.E.L., delves into the idea that UFOs may not always be actively trying to hide, but rather that their very nature or the limitations of human perception make them difficult to observe accurately.

The Problem of Observation

The article begins by addressing the skepticism of 'anti-soucoupistes' (anti-flying saucer proponents) and highlights the value of friendly debates in organizing arguments. It then poses a central question: if UFOs are numerous, why do they behave 'equivocally,' sometimes fleeing and sometimes appearing openly? The authors acknowledge the difficulty in understanding the motivations of these visitors but propose that partial explanations can be found by examining specific aspects of UFO phenomena.

It is argued that the thousands of reported UFO sightings likely represent only a tiny fraction of actual events. The focus then shifts to the problem of observation itself, using the classic case of S. Desvergers in West Palm Beach, Florida, on August 19, 1952. Desvergers, investigating a supposed plane crash, stumbled upon a hovering UFO. Despite being alert and oriented by the North Star, he initially failed to notice the object directly above him, only becoming aware of it when the stars were obscured. The experience was accompanied by unusual smells and a rise in temperature. The analysis of this case suggests that UFOs do not necessarily need to actively 'play hide-and-seek' and can go unnoticed even when in close proximity.

The article posits that UFOs might not always need elaborate disguises; the limitations of human perception can be sufficient for them to go undetected. It is suggested that many people might have been unknowingly 'brushed' by silent, dark UFOs.

Limiting the Damage

When direct invisibility is not possible, the article suggests that UFOs focus on minimizing detection. This is supported by research indicating that UFO sightings are less frequent in densely populated areas. However, when operating in populated zones, they tend to appear at night, particularly during dawn and dusk, when most people are asleep. The paradox is that while appearing at night increases the risk of detection due to their luminosity, the authors reference Edgar Allan Poe's idea that the best way to remain unnoticed is to appear in broad daylight.

Homomorphism, Homochrony, and Mimicry

This section explores the extent to which UFOs and their craft can integrate and blend into our environment. Several examples are presented:

• The Moon Mimicry: A case from Evillers, France, on July 9, 1970, describes witnesses mistaking a large, yellow, round object for the moon. Later investigation revealed the moon had set and was a crescent that night, indicating the object was not the moon. This highlights the UFOs' ability to perfectly imitate celestial bodies.
• The Airplane Mimicry: An incident on July 17, 1970, in Rive de Gier, France, involved a witness observing a stationary, grey, aircraft-like object. Experts deemed the object's behavior (hovering silently, lacking a tail, and its overall appearance) impossible for a conventional aircraft, suggesting it was a camouflaged 'Cigar UFO.' The authors note that this 'error' in mimicry (being stationary) allowed it to be detected.
• The Wagon Mimicry: An account from Morez, Jura, France, around November 1957 or 1958, describes witnesses mistaking a solitary train wagon for an actual train. The 'wagon' then lifted off the tracks and passed silently overhead. This case is presented as a perfect example of mimicry, where the object was initially accepted as normal until it exhibited anomalous behavior.

The authors emphasize that these examples demonstrate the astuteness of 'Extraterrestrials' in using camouflage when necessary. They also address a counter-argument: if camouflage is so effective, why aren't UFOs always using it? The response is that this very fact might suggest that UFOs are not merely fantasies.

The Limits of Observation and Perception

The article then delves into the biological and physiological aspects of vision, explaining how the eye and brain work together to interpret the world. It highlights the imperfections of human vision, such as distortions in the retinal image and the brain's complex processing to create a coherent perception. The authors argue that our understanding of UFOs is inherently limited by these perceptual constraints.

They propose two main possibilities regarding UFO forms:

1. Inaccessible Forms: UFOs might possess shapes that are fundamentally inaccessible to human observation and reason. In such cases, sightings are not true observations but rather 'unreasoned acknowledgments of incomprehensible phenomena.' The authors use optical illusions (Figure 2 bis) to illustrate how human reason struggles with paradoxical forms.
2. Semi-Accessible Forms: UFOs might be only partially accessible to our senses and reason. This implies that we perceive only certain aspects of the phenomenon, leading to misinterpretations. The authors suggest that our reason might latch onto familiar elements, like mistaking a UFO for a 'haystack' or 'cart,' and that the witness's description is influenced by their preconceptions.

The Role of the Witness and the Observer

The article stresses the importance of careful observation and the need for witnesses to be particularly attentive. However, it cautions against over-interpretation, warning against seeing UFOs everywhere. It advises researchers to meticulously check astronomical data, such as moon phases and positions, before accepting a witness's account of unusual celestial objects.

Furthermore, the authors discuss the limitations of detection devices, noting that in a significant percentage of cases, they do not register anything anomalous. They question whether observers using these devices might be overlooking simpler explanations, such as misidentifying the moon.

Conclusion and Future Research

The article concludes by reiterating that our perception of UFOs is shaped by our limitations and preconceptions. It suggests that the most 'reliable' sightings might come from 'virgin' witnesses who have no prior knowledge of UFO phenomena. The authors advocate for a new vocabulary to describe UFO manifestations and emphasize that understanding UFOs requires acknowledging the imperfections of our senses and reason. The study of mimicry is presented as a crucial step in unraveling the mystery of UFOs, urging readers to be more observant of their surroundings.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are mimicry, camouflage, the limitations of human perception, and the challenges of accurate UFO observation. The editorial stance is one of critical inquiry, encouraging rigorous investigation while acknowledging the profound difficulties in interpreting phenomena that may lie beyond our current understanding and sensory capabilities. The authors advocate for a scientific approach that considers both the nature of the observed phenomenon and the observer's perceptual and cognitive biases.

Title: OURANOS
Issue: 2
Volume: 2
Date: January 1973 (estimated based on content and typical publication cycles, though the cover only shows '2')
Publisher: C.C.P. 10.522.47 Paris (for subscriptions)
Country: France
Language: French

Main Cover Story: The Psychology of Perception and UFOs

The cover of OURANOS, issue 2, features a humorous illustration of a truck driver mistaking a flying saucer for a weather balloon, with the magazine title prominently displayed. The main article delves into the complex nature of perceiving UFOs, proposing a theory that challenges conventional understanding.

The 'Unformed' or 'Not Fully Perceptible' Hypothesis

The authors, B. and E., present a hypothesis that flying creatures, including those associated with UFOs, might not be what they appear. They question the functional necessity of visible wings on flying beings, suggesting they could be mere "disguises" or illusions. This leads to the idea that many observed UFOs might not be physical craft in the conventional sense, but rather "unformed" or "not fully perceptible" entities. Human reason and imagination, the authors argue, play a significant role in constructing the perceived reality of these phenomena, filling in gaps where direct perception is insufficient.

Mimicry and Human Perception

Drawing parallels from the animal kingdom, the article discusses the concept of mimicry. Examples are given of a baby gull being fooled by a cardboard beak and antelopes being deceived by disguised birds. The authors extend this to human perception, suggesting that we, like animals, are susceptible to being misled by subtle cues. A "minuscule element" or a "simple behavior" can trigger a cascade of interpretations, leading us to mistake ordinary objects for extraordinary phenomena like "flying saucers." This "form of thought that dominates us" highlights human limitations in fully grasping realities beyond our immediate comprehension.

Beyond the Physical: Mythological and Historical Context

The issue also touches upon the broader context of UFOs, with a mention of the related publication PÉGASE, which focuses on mythology, esotericism, and ancient history. PÉGASE's "Soucoupes Volantes" section posits that UFO manifestations are not merely physical events but have roots in mythology and ancient scriptures. It suggests that extraterrestrials are more evolved beings who visit Earth at the end of cycles, bringing new knowledge. This perspective implies that understanding UFOs requires looking beyond immediate physical evidence into deeper historical and cultural narratives.

Editorial Stance and Subscription Information

The editorial stance emphasizes prudence, modesty, and moderation when approaching the study of UFOs. The authors acknowledge the passion the subject evokes but stress the importance of recognizing human limitations and errors before claiming to understand the truth. The issue also includes detailed subscription information for OURANOS, offering various subscription levels for France and abroad, as well as distribution details for Switzerland. Information on PÉGASE, another specialized review, is also provided, highlighting its focus on esoteric and historical topics.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of OURANOS revolve around the psychological and perceptual aspects of UFO sightings, the role of mimicry in shaping our understanding, and the potential connection between modern UFO phenomena and ancient myths. The editorial stance is one of cautious inquiry, advocating for a humble and prudent approach that acknowledges human cognitive limitations and the vastness of the unknown. The magazine aims to stimulate thought and encourage a deeper, more nuanced exploration of the UFO phenomenon, moving beyond simple physical explanations to consider the interplay of consciousness, perception, and potentially, extraterrestrial intelligence.