Magazine Summary
OMNI
Summary
This issue of OMNI Magazine, dated October 1986, features a special anniversary report on longevity, covering topics like youth pills, laser face-lifts, artificial genes, and surrogate brains. It also includes a report on the controversial 'Peter Day film' of a supposed UFO, which BUFORA and Kodak-UK initially authenticated but later identified as a crashed F-111 jet. The cover also advertises a contest to 'Win a Trip to Outer Space (Honest!)'.
Magazine Overview
Title: OMNI
Issue: 02484
Volume: 9
Date: October 1986
Price: $3.00
Publisher: Omni Publications International Ltd.
Country: USA
Language: English
This special anniversary issue of OMNI Magazine, dated October 1986, prominently features a cover story on "LONGEVITY: EXCLUSIVE REPORT ON YOUTH PILLS LASER FACE-LIFTS BORN-AGAIN GENES SOULS ON ICE ARTIFICIAL SKIN SURROGATE BRAINS AND MUCH, MUCH MORE!". The cover also advertises a contest to "WIN A TRIP TO OUTER SPACE (HONEST!)". The visual theme of the cover is a metallic, robotic rendition of a classical figure emerging from a shell, set against a dramatic, stylized background.
UFO UPDATE: The Peter Day Film Controversy
The issue delves into the ongoing debate surrounding the "Peter Day film," a 20-second video captured on January 11, 1973, by British building surveyor Peter Day. The film shows a pulsating orange ball of light passing over treetops near Cuddington, UK. Initially, the British UFO Research Association (BUFORA) announced the film was "genuine and puzzling." Further examination by UFO-photography specialist Peter Warrington, in conjunction with Kodak-UK Laboratories, supported this conclusion, with Peter Sutherst, a technical-information consultant for Kodak-UK, stating, "Whatever the film shows, it is a real object in the sky."
However, a recent investigation by a team headed by ufologist Ken Phillips re-examined the film. Their new finding suggests the object was a U.S. Air Force F-111 jet, which had taken off from nearby Upper Heyford Air Force Base, developed a malfunction, and circled the area for 40 minutes to use up fuel. The crew parachuted to safety before the jet crashed in a field at approximately 9:46 AM on January 11, 1973, shortly after Day filmed the object. The investigation team stated, "The inevitable conclusion is that there was only one unusual phenomenon, namely the troubled F-111, and it was this which was observed and filmed by the witness."
Team coordinator Phillips added, "The conclusion seems hard hard to refute." However, Peter Warrington expressed reservations, stating that while the F-111 case is respectable, their own study under considerable magnification did not detect an aircraft at any point. Peter Day himself is also unconvinced, asserting that he did not film an aircraft and that other witnesses, including a schoolteacher and schoolchildren who were closer to the object, described it in ways consistent with a UFO, not an aircraft.
The article concludes that the controversy over the Day film will likely continue, and for serious UFO investigators, the concern is that another potential prime case has been cast into doubt. The search for irrefutable film evidence of UFOs remains ongoing.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
This issue of OMNI Magazine appears to focus on the intersection of science, technology, and speculative future possibilities, as evidenced by the cover story on longevity and the exploration of a controversial UFO case. The magazine seems to present both established scientific advancements and unexplained phenomena, encouraging critical examination while acknowledging the persistent mysteries. The editorial stance, as suggested by the handling of the Peter Day film, is one of rigorous investigation and a search for rational explanations, even when initial evidence points towards the extraordinary. The inclusion of a contest to win a trip to outer space also reflects OMNI's characteristic blend of futurism and public engagement.
The conclusion seems hard hard to refute.
Key Incidents
A 20-second film of a pulsating orange ball of light was taken by Peter Day, initially deemed a genuine UFO by BUFORA and Kodak-UK, but later identified as a U.S. Air Force F-111 jet that crashed after developing a malfunction.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the main topic of OMNI Magazine's October 1986 issue?
The main topic was a special anniversary report on longevity, exploring advancements in youth pills, laser face-lifts, artificial skin, and surrogate brains.
What was the 'Peter Day film' incident?
It was a 20-second film taken in 1973 of a pulsating orange object, initially believed to be a UFO, but later identified by BUFORA as a U.S. Air Force F-111 jet that crashed.
Who authenticated the Peter Day film initially?
The British UFO Research Association (BUFORA) and Kodak-UK Laboratories authenticated the film, stating there was no trickery and it showed a real object in the sky.
What was the final conclusion regarding the Peter Day film?
The investigation team, led by ufologist Ken Phillips, concluded that the object filmed was a U.S. Air Force F-111 jet that had malfunctioned and crashed.
In This Issue
People Mentioned
- Peter DayBritish building surveyor
- Peter WarringtonUFO-photography specialist
- Peter SutherstTechnical-information consultant for Kodak-UK
- Ken PhillipsUfologist
- Jenny RandlesAuthor/Investigator
Organisations
- British UFO Research Association (BUFORA)
- Kodak-UK Laboratories
- U.S. Air Force
Locations
- Cuddington, UK
- Upper Heyford Air Force Base, UK
- Hemel Hempstead, UK