UFO UPDATE

Magazine Overview

This issue of OMNI magazine features an article titled "CLOSE ENCOUNTER UFO UPDATE" by Harry Lebelson, reviewing the "UFO '79" conference held in San Diego. The article critiques the event for failing to deliver on its promise of "mind-boggling events" and "revelations," instead presenting familiar ufological theories. The conference, organized by Hal Starr, is described as a "big public-relations setup" potentially aimed at creating a package for national television, with attendees paying $145 for a two-day symposium.

Conference Content and Criticisms

The article highlights several key aspects and criticisms of the UFO '79 conference:

• Lack of Scientific Rigor: The author and other attendees, including physicist Stanton Freidman and NASA astrophysicist Alan Holt, expressed disappointment with the absence of genuine scientific inquiry. Freidman stated, "I think the organization of this conference leaves a lot to be desired," citing poor attendance and preparation.
• Alien Evidence Discussion: Walter H. Andrus, director of the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON), presented on "A New Look at the UFO Entity Evidence," categorizing aliens into four types: dwarflike humanoids, human-appearing beings, animallike creatures, and robots. These descriptions were noted to resemble bizarre sculptures found in the conference foyer.
• Absence of Key Speakers: The absence of two key speakers, both scientists, raised doubts about the conference's credibility. This was compounded by the fact that the promotional material claimed otherwise.
• Carl Sagan Incident: A rumor circulated about startling analyses of metal fragments related to a celebrated case, which Carl Sagan allegedly asked researchers not to reveal to "UFO nuts" but to present to legitimate scientists. However, Sagan denied any knowledge of the incident.
• Dr. R. Leo Sprinkle's Presentation: Dr. Sprinkle, a psychologist, delivered a lengthy presentation on "emerging patterns of UFO activity," which the author found redundant.
• Stanton Freidman's Remarks: Freidman, a proponent of UFOs, was candid about his dissatisfaction with the conference's organization and preparation.
• Alan Holt's Presentation: A highlight was Alan Holt's presentation on "Field Resonance Propulsion." Holt, an astrophysicist at NASA, discussed theories that could potentially enable spacecraft to reach other stellar systems by the year 2000, using concepts related to magnetic fields, electrical fields, and space-time curvature. Despite his efforts to explain the complex theories, many attendees found the material incomprehensible, leading to widespread indifference.
• Overall Tone: Holt himself expressed disappointment, stating, "I expected a more scientifically motivated session and was appalled by the overall tone of the conference." He felt that rational scientific inquiry had taken a backseat to promotion by UFO enthusiasts.

Conclusion

The article concludes that UFO '79, despite its promises, largely failed to offer new insights or scientific validation for UFO phenomena. Instead, it served as a platform for promotion, with the author suggesting that the event was more about creating a media package than fostering genuine scientific exploration. The issue of OMNI magazine, through this review, appears to maintain a critical stance on unsubstantiated claims within the UFO community, while acknowledging the theoretical possibilities presented by scientists like Alan Holt.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of OMNI magazine, as evidenced by Harry Lebelson's review of UFO '79, seems to adopt a stance of critical inquiry regarding UFO phenomena. The article emphasizes the importance of scientific methodology and evidence-based research, contrasting it with what it perceives as the promotional and often unsubstantiated claims prevalent in the ufology community. Recurring themes include the gap between public fascination with UFOs and the scientific community's skepticism, the challenges of separating genuine research from sensationalism, and the theoretical possibilities of advanced propulsion systems. The editorial stance appears to favor rigorous scientific investigation over anecdotal evidence and speculative theories, while still being open to exploring cutting-edge scientific concepts, as demonstrated by the coverage of Alan Holt's work.