Magazine Summary

The North Texas Skeptic

Magazine Issue North Texas Skeptic 2000s

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You’re on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

Summary

Overview

This issue of The North Texas Skeptic critically examines arguments against Darwinian evolution presented by the Institute for Creation Research, particularly focusing on the 'Imminent Death of Darwinism and the Rise of Intelligent Design' by G.J. Brewer. It also features an article on 'Gemstone Therapy' by V.K. Jain, which is critically reviewed by Prasad Golla, highlighting the lack of scientific basis for such alternative medical practices. The issue concludes with a 'Skeptical Ink' comic strip.

Magazine Overview

Title: The North Texas Skeptic
Issue: Volume 15, Number 12
Date: December 2001
Publisher: The North Texas Skeptics
Country: US
Language: English

This issue of The North Texas Skeptic delves into two primary topics: the ongoing debate between Darwinian evolution and creationism/intelligent design, and a critical examination of alternative medicine, specifically gemstone therapy.

The Death of Darwinism

Authored by John Blanton, this article critiques an issue of 'Impact' (No. 341) from the Institute for Creation Research (ICR), titled 'The Imminent Death of Darwinism and the Rise of Intelligent Design.' The ICR, described as a prominent young Earth creationist (YEC) group, was founded in 1970. The article highlights ICR Senior V.P. Duane Gish's history of debating mainstream scientists on topics conflicting with creationism.

The focus then shifts to G.J. Brewer, whose article in 'Impact' argues that modern biology, particularly DNA sequence information and the concept of irreducible complexity (citing Behe's 'Darwin's Black Box'), should lead scientists to abandon Darwin's theory in favor of intelligent design or Biblical creation. Brewer, a biologist with a Ph.D. from UCSD and postdoctoral work at MIT, is listed by ICR as a creation scientist.

The article explains the concept of common ancestry through DNA similarities, illustrating it with a diagram of the Last Unknown Common Ancestor (LUCA). Brewer, however, emphasizes the differences in DNA sequences rather than similarities, suggesting that these differences support a model of independent origins, akin to a 'shrub' or 'grass,' which he aligns with the Genesis account of creation. He points to the low percentage of common proteins and unique genes in *E. coli* as evidence against common ancestry.

The author of 'The North Texas Skeptic' article counters Brewer's argument by stating that Brewer conveniently ignores that they are looking at modern organisms and redraws the tree of life to show a complete evolutionary path. The article also touches upon Michael Behe's argument of irreducible complexity, which posits that certain features could not have evolved through gradual Darwinian processes due to the requirement of multiple simultaneous mutations.

Note from the Secretary

Authored by John Blanton, this section marks the end of the first year of the twenty-first century. Blanton notes the global reach of information through the internet and the receipt of both supportive and critical feedback. He introduces an article on gem therapy submitted by a reader from India, stating that it is not from a skeptical viewpoint but is included to illustrate beliefs taken on faith. He also mentions a companion piece by NTS board member Prasad Golla.

Gemstone Therapy:

This section features two articles on gemstone therapy. The first, by V.K. JAIN from Dehradun, India, presents gemstone therapy as a technique to combat tumor growth. Jain describes tumors as complex abnormal growths, differentiating between benign and malignant types. He suggests that toxic waste accumulation in the body contributes to tumor formation. The article lists various tumor types and discusses conventional treatments like surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, highlighting their limitations and side effects. Jain proposes that a change in lifestyle, diet, and environment, along with improved waste elimination, is crucial. Gemstone therapy is presented as a natural and ancient science that functions through the association of colors emitted by planets, influencing human behavior and actions. The therapy aims to rebalance 'color energy' centers in the body by using gemstones to provide specific color rays. Jain reports conducting experiments where unexamined tumors were restored to normal conditions within 6 to 36 months, though he advises regular medical monitoring.

A Note from Prasad Golla on Gemstone Therapy

Prasad Golla expresses his reluctance to publish Jain's article, fearing it might lend legitimacy to pseudo-scientific claims. He questions the scientific basis of gemstone therapy, noting that gems are primarily chemical compounds and elements whose structure, while unique, has no scientifically proven extraordinary powers to influence living tissues. Golla critiques Jain's premise, stating that the concept relies on astrology, which he disputes, and that there is no scientific evidence for colors radiating from gems influencing organs. He argues that the interaction of gem colors and planetary 'self-rays' has no scientific basis and would require a Nobel Prize to prove. Golla shares a personal anecdote about losing his grandmother to a tumor and advises against seeking 'alternative' treatments, suggesting that only those selling gemstones benefit from such practices.

Skeptical Ink

This section features a comic strip by Prasad Golla and John Blanton, copyrighted in 2001. The comic depicts a fortune teller making predictions, with the final panel humorously referencing Mr. bin Laden and the year 2002.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently adopts a skeptical stance, critically examining claims that lack scientific evidence. The articles on Darwinism and gemstone therapy exemplify this approach, with the editors actively questioning and refuting arguments based on faith, pseudoscience, or misinterpretations of scientific data. The publication aims to promote critical thinking and provide a platform for reasoned discourse on controversial topics.

Theories are to be modified or abandoned when they are inconsistent with one significant fact. Based on relationships of similar genes, large numbers of unrelated genes and irreducible complexity, Darwin's evolution of species needs to be replaced by intelligent design. According to the Bible, the Designer was God with more than adequate intelligence and power to create all the major kinds of life in a short period of time. While we will never be able to prove the singularity of creation by God, the evidence better supports faith in God, rather than faith in Darwinism.

— Gregory J. Brewer

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Institute for Creation Research (ICR)?

The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) is an organization in Santee, California, that publishes creationist literature and is described as the 'granddaddy of all young Earth creationist (YEC) groups in the US.'

What is the main argument presented in G.J. Brewer's 'The Imminent Death of Darwinism and the Rise of Intelligent Design'?

Brewer argues that unique DNA sequence information and the irreducible complexity of biological systems suggest that Darwin's theory of evolution should be abandoned in favor of intelligent design or Biblical creation.

What is Gemstone Therapy?

Gemstone therapy is presented as an alternative technique that uses gemstones to rebalance 'color energy' centers in the body, supposedly to strengthen the immune system and combat diseases like tumors.

What is the skeptical viewpoint on Gemstone Therapy?

The skeptical viewpoint, as presented by Prasad Golla, is that there is no scientific basis for gemstone therapy, its claims are pseudo-scientific, and the benefits are likely due to the placebo effect or the financial gain of gemstone sellers.

In This Issue

People Mentioned

  • John BlantonAuthor
  • Gregory J. BrewerAuthor
  • Duane GishSenior V.P.
  • V.K. JainAuthor
  • Prasad GollaNTS board member
  • Michael BeheAuthor
  • Donald C. LindsayRebutter
  • Salvador E. LuriaProfessor
  • J. C. VenterResearcher
  • E. S. LanderResearcher
  • W. F. DoolittleResearcher

Organisations

  • The North Texas Skeptics
  • Institute for Creation Research (ICR)
  • Christian Heritage College
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Southern Illinois University
  • National Science Foundation

Locations

  • Santee, California
  • Pasadena, California
  • San Diego, California
  • Berkeley, California
  • Dehradun, India

Topics & Themes

Creationism vs. EvolutionIntelligent DesignAlternative MedicinePseudoscienceDarwinismEvolutionCreationismInstitute for Creation ResearchGemstone TherapyTumorsCancerSkepticismDNACommon AncestryLUCAPrasad Golla