North Texas Skeptic - Vol 15 No 10 - 2001

Magazine Overview

The North Texas Skeptic, Volume 15, Number 10, October 2001, is a newsletter from The North Texas Skeptics, a group dedicated to promoting critical thinking and scientific skepticism. This issue features several articles that challenge pseudoscientific claims and address contemporary events from a rationalist perspective.

A Matter of Degree

This article, authored by John Blanton, critically examines the arguments of Young Earth Creationists (YECs), particularly focusing on Kent Hovind. The central theme is the misrepresentation of scientific data, specifically molecular biology and protein sequences, to support creationist viewpoints. Blanton addresses Hovind's claims regarding cytochrome c, a protein crucial for cellular respiration. Hovind asserts that human cytochrome c is more closely related to a sunflower than to a chimpanzee, a claim used to argue against evolutionary theory. The article refutes this by presenting evidence that human and chimpanzee cytochrome c sequences are nearly identical, with only minor differences compared to other organisms. Blanton explains that the degree of difference in amino acid sequences directly correlates with the evolutionary divergence time between species. He criticizes Hovind and other YECs for misinterpreting or selectively using data, sometimes even fabricating claims, such as the 'bullfrog affair' involving Duane Gish, where a creationist claimed a bullfrog protein was more similar to human proteins than a chimpanzee's. The article also touches upon other creationist arguments, like those presented in the book 'Of Pandas and People,' and highlights how scientific research in biotechnology and DNA analysis consistently supports the framework of evolution.

Sathya Sai Baba the Ugly (First of two parts)

Authored by Prasad Golla, this article delves into a more critical examination of the spiritual leader Sathya Sai Baba, contrasting with a previous article that introduced him as a divine figure. Golla presents Sai Baba as a fraud who has amassed wealth and influence through the gullibility of his followers. The article debunks Sai Baba's alleged miracles, describing them as 'third-grade magician's tricks' that have been exposed by rationalists like Professor Abraham Kovoor. It details how Sai Baba has been challenged for decades to face public scrutiny of his claims, particularly regarding his 'materializations.' The article also brings up serious allegations against Sai Baba, including a 'kidney fraud' incident at one of his medical facilities and, more disturbingly, multiple murders that allegedly occurred in his bedroom, linked to an assassination attempt and the alleged sexual abuse of young boys who were his devotees. The article cites evidence from various sources, including the Indian Skeptic and special reports, to support these claims, noting that Sai Baba or his institutions have been unable to deny the authenticity of these accusations.

September 11: "Day of the Birds"

Written by Daniel R. Barnett, this piece expresses the North Texas Skeptics' condolences to the victims of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The article acknowledges the profound sadness and loss experienced by the nation. It notes the government's grounding of all flights, leading to the moniker "Day of the Birds." The author expresses concern about the subsequent rise of media scams, unfounded pronouncements of divine judgment, and other forms of misinformation capitalizing on the tragedy. The North Texas Skeptics pledge to investigate and debunk such claims, citing the example of a photograph supposedly taken from the World Trade Center observation tower that has already been debunked. The article concludes with a message of resilience and national unity, invoking the motto "E pluribus unum."

Skeptical Ink

This section features a comic strip by Prasad Golla and John Blanton. The comic depicts a psychic who claims to have made considerable fame and fortune by predicting big and small events. In the final panel, when his car is being towed away, he nonchalantly states, "Oh! I knew they would do that," implying a self-serving prediction or a lack of genuine foresight.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of pseudoscientific claims, particularly in the realms of creationism and paranormal phenomena, and the application of scientific reasoning to contemporary events. The North Texas Skeptics maintain a strong stance against misinformation, fraud, and the exploitation of public credulity. They advocate for evidence-based reasoning and a skeptical approach to extraordinary claims, whether they originate from religious figures, scientific deniers, or those seeking to profit from tragedy. The editorial stance is one of vigilance, education, and a commitment to debunking falsehoods to uphold scientific integrity and rational discourse.