Magazine Summary

The Newsletter of The North Texas Skeptics

Magazine Issue North Texas Skeptic 1990s

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You’re on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

Summary

Overview

This issue of The Newsletter of The North Texas Skeptics critically examines health claims, historical revisionism, and media reporting. An article on 'Healthy Skepticism' by Tim Gorski, M.D., questions the benefits of antioxidant supplements like beta-carotene and vitamin E, citing studies that show no cancer prevention and even increased mortality. The 'Skeptical News & Views' section covers the evolutionary development of the eye and refutes Holocaust denial as pseudohistory, emphasizing the scientific methodology of historical proof through convergence of evidence. 'The third eye' column by Pat Reeder critiques media watchdog groups like FAIR and the Center for Science in the Public Interest for biased reporting and scare-mongering. A cartoon satirizes media sensationalism.

Magazine Overview

The Newsletter of The North Texas Skeptics, Volume 8, Number 8, published in August 1994, presents a collection of articles that champion skepticism and critical thinking across various domains, including health, history, and media analysis.

Healthy Skepticism

This section, authored by Tim Gorski, M.D., delves into the complexities of antioxidant "nutritional supplements" like Beta-Carotene and Vitamins C and E. Gorski challenges the simplistic notion that these supplements prevent cancer and prolong life. He cites the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study, which involved over 29,000 male smokers in Finland. Surprisingly, this study found no reduction in lung cancer incidence among those taking beta-carotene supplements; instead, it revealed a statistically significant 8% excess mortality. Another case-control study is mentioned, linking high beta-carotene intake to an increased risk of cervical dysplasia. Furthermore, a multi-center trial on colorectal cancer showed no reduction in precancerous lesions with these supplements. Gorski points out that while critics may pick apart research studies, skepticism is often selectively applied by supplement promoters. He also discusses research at Northwestern University Medical School on an animal model for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), involving a mutant Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD) gene, suggesting a "dominant gain of function" that needs further investigation. The article concludes by emphasizing that many chemical reactions are reversible, and while antioxidants can quench free radicals, they can also produce them, urging caution against the assumption that more is always better.

Skeptical News & Views

This section features several short pieces:

Evolutionary View

This piece addresses the creationist argument about the evolution of the eye. It quotes Darwin's perspective that the difficulty of believing in the evolution of a complex organ like the eye is understandable but not insurmountable. The article highlights the work of Dan Nilsson and Susanne Pelger, whose computer simulations demonstrated how a light-sensitive layer could evolve into a functional eye in under 400,000 generations, even with conservative assumptions. Richard Dawkins is quoted as describing the results as "swift and decisive."

Pseudohistory: Proving the Holocaust

Authored by Michael Shermer, this essay refutes Holocaust revisionism by framing history as a scientific discipline. Shermer argues that while the Holocaust is well-established by historical research, all knowledge claims must be continually tested and improved. He contrasts historical methodology with pseudohistory, which rewrites the past for present purposes. Shermer identifies common methodologies of fringe groups, such as creationists and revisionists, including attacking opponents' weak points, exploiting minor errors, quoting out of context, mistaking debates for refutations, and focusing only on what is not known. He emphasizes that historical proof, like the proof of evolution, comes from a "convergence of evidence"—multiple independent inductions that "jump together" to establish a conclusion. Shermer asserts that if history is not treated as a science, it could lead to the "end of history."

The third eye

Written by Pat Reeder, this column offers a critique of media and advocacy groups. Reeder discusses the controversy surrounding Rush Limbaugh and the media watchdog group FAIR, which accused Limbaugh of spreading misinformation. Reeder finds FAIR's own methodology to be biased, suggesting they start with a predetermined conclusion. He also criticizes the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) for what he calls "unscientific scare-mongering" regarding the fat content of Mexican food and other dietary issues. Reeder advocates for a healthy dose of skepticism towards all news sources, especially those using innocent-sounding acronyms.

Up a tree

This section includes a satirical cartoon by Laura Ainsworth, which pokes fun at sensationalized news reporting, specifically referencing W.V. Grant and a story about Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie. It also briefly mentions other news items, including a movie about the Roswell incident, GM's Oldsmobile dealer retreats, the return of Spy magazine, a group of "immortals," a dowsing convention, fire-walking seminars, W.V. Grant's alleged fundraising tactics, a religiously motivated murder in Paris, and a measles outbreak in Illinois linked to Christian Scientists.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The overarching theme of this issue is the promotion of critical thinking and scientific skepticism. The articles consistently challenge unsubstantiated claims, whether they relate to health supplements, historical revisionism, or media narratives. The editorial stance advocates for evidence-based reasoning, rigorous methodology, and a cautious approach to information, particularly when presented by groups with agendas or by sensationalized media reports. The newsletter encourages readers to question claims, verify sources, and apply a discerning eye to the information they encounter.

"Although we would all like to believe that changes in diet or lifestyle can greatly improve our health," the editors note in conclusion, "the likelihood is that, with a few exception such as smoking cessation, many if not most such changes will produce only small effects [which] may not be consistent [and] will almost inevitably involve some sort of trade-off."

— Journal editors

Key Incidents

  1. Finland

    A 5- to 8-year follow-up study of 29,133 male smokers found no reduction in lung cancer incidence from beta-carotene and vitamin supplements, but an 8% excess mortality.

  2. A case-control study found an increased risk of cervical dysplasia among women with a high intake of beta-carotene.

  3. A multi-center trial studying colorectal cancer found no reduction in the occurrence of precancerous lesions over four years with beta-carotene, vitamin C, or E supplements.

  4. Researchers at Northwestern University Medical School found a mouse model for ALS involving a mutant Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD) gene with a 'dominant gain of function'.

  5. Computer simulations by Dan Nilsson and Susanne Pelger suggest the evolution of a fish eye from flat skin could occur in under 400,000 generations.

  6. Holocaust revisionism is discussed as a form of pseudohistory that attempts to rewrite the past for present or political purposes.

  7. A media watchdog group called FAIR released a list of alleged 'lies' by Rush Limbaugh, which the author critiques as biased and inaccurate.

  8. The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is criticized for scare-mongering regarding the fat content of Mexican food.

  9. A made-for-cable movie called 'Roswell' about the alleged flying saucer crash of the 1940s is mentioned, with a note that new witnesses may be discredited old witnesses who changed their names.

  10. A story about W.V. Grant's fundraising methods is mentioned, alleging he asked followers for money to repair nonexistent tornado damage to his mansion.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the findings regarding beta-carotene and vitamin supplements for cancer prevention?

Studies, including a large one in Finland, found no reduction in lung cancer incidence from beta-carotene and vitamin supplements, and one study even showed an 8% excess mortality among supplement users.

How is the Holocaust proven, according to historical methodology?

The Holocaust is proven through a convergence of evidence, a method where multiple independent lines of evidence from various fields like archival research, oral histories, and physical site inspections all point to the same conclusion, similar to how evolution is proven.

What is the author's critique of media watchdog groups like FAIR?

The author criticizes groups like FAIR for having a political or social agenda and presenting themselves as objective, while selectively releasing statistics and engaging in biased reporting, rather than rigorously checking facts.

What is the main argument against Holocaust revisionism?

Holocaust revisionism is a form of pseudohistory that attempts to rewrite the past for personal or political purposes, and it fails when subjected to scientific historical methodology, which relies on a convergence of evidence.

In This Issue

People Mentioned

  • Tim GorskiM.D., practicing physician, chairman of the D/FW Council Against Health Fraud, North Texas Skeptics Technical Advisor
  • Darwin
  • Dan Nilssonresearcher
  • Susanne Pelgerresearcher
  • Richard DawkinsOxford zoologist
  • Michael ShermerAssistant Professor of History of Science, Director and CEO of The Skeptics Society, publisher and editor-in-chief of Skeptic
  • Spinoza
  • Lipstadt
  • William WhewellEnglish philosopher of science
  • Pat Reeder
  • President Clinton
  • Rush Limbaugh
  • +8 more

Organisations

  • The North Texas Skeptics
  • D/FW Council Against Health Fraud
  • The Skeptics Society
  • FAIR (Fairness And Accuracy In Reporting)
  • AIM (Accuracy In Media)
  • Center for Science in the Public Interest
  • American Association of Dowsers
  • KDFW (Channel 4) News
  • Christian Scientists

Locations

  • Finland
  • Arlington, TX, USA
  • Chicago, USA
  • Paris, France
  • Elsiah, Illinois, USA
  • Santa Cruz, USA
  • DeSoto, USA
  • Lancaster, USA
  • Rwanda

Topics & Themes

Healthy SkepticismNutritional SupplementsPseudohistoryHolocaust DenialEvolutionMedia Criticismskepticismhealthsupplementsantioxidantscancer preventionbeta-carotenevitamin Eholocaust revisionismnatural selectionmedia biasaccuracy in reportingskeptical analysispseudoscience