Magazine Summary
The Newsletter of The North Texas Skeptics
Summary
This issue of The North Texas Skeptics delves into various topics through a skeptical lens. Joe Voelkering discusses how legal standards of proof, such as 'preponderance of the evidence' and 'proof beyond a reasonable doubt,' reflect a similar acknowledgment of uncertainty found in the scientific method. Tim Gorski critiques the trend of 'Complementary Medicine,' highlighting how promoters of alternative therapies often selectively present information and employ scare tactics, while admitting orthodox medicine is best for acute problems. A letter to the editor and Gorski's response debate the FDA's role in regulating supplements and the safety of chelation therapy. The issue also covers a dubious TV report on the 'Total Overcomers' cult, the failure of psychics to predict the California earthquake, and the lack of evidence for the Roswell incident. It concludes with a satirical look at 'political correctness' in college courses and a cartoon about a sci-fi show.
Magazine Overview
Title: The Newsletter of The North Texas Skeptics
Issue: Volume 8 Number 2
Date: February 1994
This issue of The North Texas Skeptics features a range of articles examining various phenomena through a skeptical lens, from legal standards of evidence to the claims of alternative medicine and UFO reports.
Legalized Skepticism by Joe Voelkering
Joe Voelkering draws a parallel between the scientific method and legal standards of proof, arguing that both acknowledge the inherent difficulty in determining absolute certainty. He outlines the different legal standards: 'preponderance of the evidence' (more likely than not), 'clear and convincing proof' (highly probable), and 'proof beyond a reasonable doubt' (the highest standard, used in criminal cases). Voelkering notes that even the Supreme Court often makes decisions by a narrow majority, demonstrating that uncertainty is a recognized factor in high-level decision-making.
Healthy Skepticism by Tim Gorski, M.D.
Dr. Tim Gorski addresses the rise of 'Complementary Medicine,' which he views as a rebranding of quackery. He criticizes promoters of homeopathy, 'health' foods, and other alternative therapies for selectively presenting biased information, using scare tactics (e.g., about psychotropic drugs or breast cancer treatments), and portraying their methods as compatible with science. Gorski points out that these promoters often avoid offering treatments for life-threatening conditions, focusing instead on chronic ailments where medical science has not yet found definitive cures. He contrasts this with the scientific approach, which does not rely on faith or the pronouncements of individuals with credentials but on reason and evidence.
Letters to the Editor and Dr. Gorski's Response
A letter from Joe Voelkering questions Dr. Gorski's stance on FDA proposals regarding vitamins and supplements, suggesting the FDA's aim is more than just labeling regulation and expressing skepticism about the FDA's motives. Voelkering also notes that L-tryptophan deaths were traced to a contaminant from a single supplier, not necessarily non-FDA approved L-tryptophan itself. He advocates for personal health decisions based on trusted sources rather than FDA mandates.
Dr. Gorski responds by clarifying that while the FDA's initial proposal for intake limits was dropped, the ultimate goals might still be regulatory. He reiterates that the tryptophan tragedy was linked to a specific contaminant and that the cause is not fully understood. Gorski emphasizes the principle that the null hypothesis for any product or treatment is that it is ineffective and potentially dangerous, requiring proof of safety and efficacy. He argues against relying on 'faith' in the FDA or any authority, stressing that scientific truth is based on reason and evidence. Gorski warns that abolishing the FDA would not automatically create a more skeptical public but could lead to greater reliance on quacks. He suggests a color-coding system for labeling as a potential regulatory approach, but acknowledges the complexities involved. He concludes by stating that, for now, the FDA plays a crucial role in ensuring product safety and effectiveness.
The Third Eye by Pat Reeder
Pat Reeder critiques a KDFW-TV news report on the 'Total Overcomers,' a group promoting beliefs about aliens controlling Earth and causing natural disasters. Reeder criticizes the report for its credulity, lack of skeptical inquiry, and use of sensationalist music and visuals, comparing it to a promotional piece for the movie 'Fire In The Sky.' He notes the report failed to include any dissenting opinions or investigations into the group's claims. Reeder also satirically interprets the meaning of recent natural disasters, offering practical, non-supernatural explanations.
Random News
- This section includes several brief items:
- An investigation by the General Accounting Office into the Roswell crashed-saucer tale found no records, suggesting a conspiracy to keep it secret.
- A ghost festival in Bojnice, Slovakia, is advertised, featuring a 'booked' ghost.
- The archbishop of Paris is campaigning to make Jacques Fesch, a convicted murderer, a saint, citing his repentance in prison.
- A list of unusual college courses is presented, including 'Introduction to Television Meteorology,' 'UFOs In American Society,' 'Advanced Backpacking,' 'Food For Thought,' and 'The Madonna Phenomenon,' which uses Madonna's videos for textual analysis of gender and sexuality.
Up a tree (Cartoon by Laura Ainsworth)
A skeptical cartoon depicts a character watching a sci-fi show on TV, commenting on the spooky music, weird effects, aliens, and UFOs, and then noting that 'Clarice Tinsley was in it,' implying the news report was more about the presentation than the substance.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The recurring themes in this issue are skepticism towards pseudoscientific claims, the importance of evidence-based reasoning, and critical evaluation of information presented by media, alternative health practitioners, and even governmental agencies. The editorial stance is clearly in favor of rationalism, scientific inquiry, and a healthy dose of doubt when evaluating extraordinary claims. The newsletter actively debunks or questions phenomena that lack empirical support, promoting critical thinking as a vital tool for navigating complex issues.
So -- the next time someone takes you to task for admitting to a finite amount of doubt about a conclusion, you can respond with a simple question: "Do you think I should have a higher level of confidence in that matter than we expect to see in decisions by the Supreme Court?"
Key Incidents
Psychics failed to predict the recent California earthquake, though Jack Coles, operating the Early Warning Earthquake Detection Network, made an accurate prediction.
An investigation was initiated into the Roswell crashed-saucer tale, with no records found by the Pentagon or National Archives.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the different standards of proof used in legal cases?
Legal cases use standards such as 'preponderance of the evidence' (more likely than not), 'clear and convincing proof' (highly probable), and 'proof beyond a reasonable doubt' (used in criminal cases).
What is the main criticism of 'Complementary Medicine'?
Promoters of 'Complementary Medicine' often present biased half-truths, use scare tactics, and portray their methods as helpful adjuncts to science, while avoiding serious medical conditions.
What is the stance on chelation therapy in the magazine?
While legitimate uses for chelation therapy exist in cases of metal poisoning, its promotion for preventing or curing atherosclerosis is considered 'over-hyped' and quackery.
What was the outcome of the investigation into the Roswell incident?
The Pentagon and National Archives found no records of a 1947 saucer crash, indicating a complete lack of evidence for the Roswell incident.
In This Issue
People Mentioned
- Joe VoelkeringAuthor
- Tim GorskiAuthor
- Robert C. AtkinsMentioned
- René DescartesMentioned
- John ThomasAuthor
- Shaun RaabReporter
- Travis WaltonMentioned
- Clarice TinsleyAnchor
- Jack ColesMentioned
- Steve SchiffRepresentative
- Jan PapcoCurator
- Jacques FeschMentioned
- +3 more
Organisations
- The North Texas Skeptics
- American Chiropractic Association
- Atkins Center for Complementary Medicine
- National Transportation Safety Board
- Supreme Court
- FDA
- Mayo Clinic
- CSICOP
- General Accounting Office
- Pentagon
- National Archives
- Project Blue Book
- University of Colorado
- KDFW-TV
Locations
- Addison, USA
- Dallas, USA
- San Jose, USA
- Texas, USA
- Connecticut, USA
- New Mexico, USA
- Bojnice, Slovakia