Norsk UFO-Tidsskrift - 1970 No 4

Magazine Overview

Title: NORSK UFO-TIDSSKRIFT
Issue: Nr. 4
Volume: 1. årgang
Date: 1970
Publisher: Norsk UFO Center
Country: Norway
Language: Norwegian

This issue of Norsk UFO-Tidsskrift, published in 1970, focuses on organizational changes within the Norwegian UFO community and presents several case studies.

Redaksjonelt (Editorial)

The editorial, titled "Better late than never...", reflects on the history of Norsk UFO-Tidsskrift. It explains that the initiative to publish the magazine began in 1969 with the Trondheim UFO-Forening, which sought cooperation from other Norwegian UFO groups. Only Norges UFC-Informasjon (NUFOI) in Oslo participated, providing startup capital and half the page space. Trondheim UFO-Forening handled the editorial work. Three issues were published in 1970, but the fourth issue was delayed. The editorial notes that six years later (from the perspective of the article's writing), NUFOI reported that subscribers were still inquiring about the missing fourth issue. NUFOI then decided to fulfill their obligation and publish issue number 4.

The editorial explains that Trondheim UFO-Forening was dissolved in 1972 and replaced by Norsk UFO Center, a private research organization with a focus on scientific research. Norsk UFO Center took on the task of completing Norsk UFO-Tidsskrift nr. 4/1970, selecting content that had not appeared in their own publication, UFO Forum, and ensuring it was interesting and credible. They express regret over how the initiative ended and leave it to the subscribers to judge the actions of the collaborating party.

Norges UFO-Informasjon, Oslo, decided to put on hold

This article reports on a meeting of NUFOI (Norges UFO-Informasjon) on November 15, 1975, where the future of the organization was discussed. Formann Erne Børcke noted that the established guidelines had not yet been fully implemented and that the organization had functioned as an interim board. He suggested evaluating whether to continue as a formal association. Børcke stated he had done his part and that the necessary apparatus was in place if there was a genuine desire to continue. He personally wished to step down, feeling that the work no longer offered him much personal satisfaction and that it was time to re-evaluate the situation, as other members had expressed similar views.

Leif Iversøn from the report section mentioned that he had been involved in UFO work since 1957 and intended to scale back his activities, finding it increasingly like a regular job. He suggested that informal gatherings might be more beneficial. Nestformann Per Nørgaard stated he no longer had time for significant UFO work. Hans Kr. Moe had estimated the hours required to publish a magazine, and it was agreed that such an undertaking was unrealistic.

Børcke emphasized the responsibility of the association towards its members to produce content and disseminate information. He also touched upon the need for 'missionary' work, a concept he doubted the value of. He believed NUFOI had succeeded in popularizing the term 'UFO' but doubted any UFO association could significantly influence authorities or scientific opinion on the matter.

Sverre Wiseth was the only one to object, arguing that it was important to present oneself as a member of an organization and suggested focusing on smaller tasks. The chairman referred to existing associations, some of which were criticized for their uncritical approach to member recruitment. He suggested that those seeking an association could join others, who might be more generous with titles.

The decision regarding the future of the association was postponed to the next meeting. On May 11, 1976, the debate from the previous meeting was reiterated. The chairman proposed that NUFOI, Oslo, be put on indefinite hold to keep all options open, and this proposal was unanimously accepted. The report was written by Jon-Ingar Haltuff.

Norsk UFO Centers Kommentarer (Norsk UFO Center's Comments)

Norsk UFO Center commented on the NUFOI meeting, noting that it reflected typical problems of UFO associations. They observed that the motivation often seemed to be a psychological need rather than a desire to solve an intellectual problem. "Work" often consisted of informal discussions, collecting clippings, and reports, with a lack of clear goals and methodology. They noted the common desire to "influence authorities and science," a goal they found less effective than conducting independent research.

Norsk UFO Center contrasted its approach with traditional UFO groups. They considered mere "clippings" and "reports" to be of little value without rigorous verification, including field investigations and the collection of "secondary data." They pointed out that many cases, initially appearing credible, were revealed as hoaxes upon closer examination, especially those from other countries. They criticized UFO groups for marketing such cases, contributing to "myths" and "classics" that damaged the UFO subject's reputation.

Norsk UFO Center asserted its ability to approach the UFO problem as seriously as a university, citing the existence of similar global organizations. They echoed Dr. Hynek's sentiment that it is more productive to conduct one's own research rather than solely trying to influence official institutions, especially when possessing the necessary resources.

NORSK UFO-CENTER

This section details the operational structure and philosophy of Norsk UFO Center (NUFOC). It states that NUFOC is not a traditional association but a nationwide organization that actively researches UFO phenomena according to established guidelines, developed in consultation with American scientists. These guidelines are legally binding and translated into modern job descriptions for each organizational unit. The central administration is in Trondheim, with departments in three regions: Eastern, Western, and Southern Norway. These departments are further divided into sections, each with a specific task. In addition to these organizational units, NUFOC has REPRESENTATIVES, and most members are categorized as RAPPORTERS, FIELD RESEARCHERS, or CONSULTANTS. Rapporteurs act as "listening posts," informing NUFOC of anything of interest. Field researchers conduct on-site investigations with specialized equipment, while consultants provide expert advice.

Collected data is forwarded to the Report Center, Research Section, Scandinavian Section, Global Section, the organizational leader, and the Norwegian Armed Forces High Command, with whom NUFOC has established cooperation. NUFOC also has cooperation agreements with other Scandinavian UFO organizations and significant UFO organizations worldwide, as well as with scientists, primarily in the USA.

NUFOC's research includes laboratory analysis, utilizing its own laboratory and two larger external laboratories on a consultation basis. Literature is received from publishers in London and Copenhagen. NUFOC is known for its investigations in Namsenfjorden and Djupsjøen. The organization has two special DEPLOYMENT SECTIONS equipped with technological gear for field research. One section specializes in maritime investigations, using divers and boats, while the other constructs and manufactures technological equipment, including Geiger counters and detectors.

Spectrographs and specialized photographic equipment are now in use. NUFOC is in the process of establishing a Scandinavian computer analysis program, initially led by a Swedish group called Project URD, with the aim of making it a global initiative. Dr. Hynek has expressed significant interest in such collaboration. A radio communication system across borders is also being established.

Norsk UFO Center does not offer passive membership, as it does not serve the organization's purpose. Due to the practical nature of its research, NUFOC has set high standards for applicants, requiring specific competencies and adherence to restrictions, except for Rapporteurs. The admission requirements, basic principles, purpose, and job instructions have proven to be effective. While some may find these standards "strict," experience has shown their necessity.

Unlike traditional associations that collected "reports" and press clippings, NUFOC is able to conduct its information activities on a more defensible basis. They consider "clippings" and "reports" to be of little value unless verified through extensive field investigations and the collection of "secondary data." This process includes scrutinizing the rapporteurs themselves. NUFOC has often been able to re-examine cases that initially seemed credible, only to find them to be hoaxes after thorough investigation, particularly those from other countries. They criticize UFO organizations for marketing such cases, contributing to "myths" and "classics" that damage the UFO subject's reputation and lead to sectarian, irrational behavior.

Norsk UFO Center claims to approach the UFO problem with the same seriousness as a university, a capability shared by several similar organizations worldwide. They agree with Dr. Hynek that it is more effective to conduct one's own research rather than solely trying to influence authorities and scientific institutions, especially when possessing the necessary resources. The key factor is funding, but NUFOC believes that with the right approach, significant achievements are possible, citing previous UFO organizations that had adequate financial resources.

UFO-LANDING PÅ ØSTERSTRAND I DANMARK ? (UFO Landing on Østerstrand in Denmark ?)

This article investigates a series of circular marks found on the beach at Østerstrand near Fredricia, Denmark. The marks, discovered by Italian musician Age Totaro in October 1973 while he was working in the area, were noted for their regularity, precise size, and alignment towards the water. Totaro and his family attempted to report this to a local newspaper but faced language barriers. Upon learning of a UFO exhibition in Herning, they visited it and spoke with Willy Wegner, an observer for DUFOC (Dansk UFO-Center).

Wegner confirmed that the family knew little about UFOs but had heard that UFOs sometimes leave marks where they land. The marks were still present. Local military personnel, after two days of deliberation, suggested the marks could be from grenade throwing. However, the article questions this explanation, noting similar marks found closer to a path and a bathhouse, making grenade throwing unlikely in that specific location.

A dog at the scene dug intensely at the edges of the craters, leading to speculation about unusual smells or other phenomena.

LANDING SAMME STED I 1967 (Landing Same Place in 1967)

This sub-section reports on a UFO landing incident at the same location in Østerstrand in the autumn of 1967. The observer, who was about 30 meters away, witnessed the event from 17:30 to 17:45. Initially mistaking the object for a car stuck on the beach, the observer approached and realized it was not a vehicle. At a distance of about 25 meters, the observer felt an inexplicable force preventing further approach, a phenomenon sometimes reported during landings.

The object was observed hovering 10-15 cm above the sand, with a diameter of approximately 8 meters and a flattened upper side. It then silently ascended about 2 meters higher before moving out over the water. Once in the middle of the strait, it ascended rapidly and disappeared. An anonymous person called the observer the next day to confirm the landing, stating they had seen the same object the following day, despite the observer not having mentioned the experience to anyone.

The source for this information is listed as Fredericia UFO-gruppe / UFO ASPEKT nr. 1/74 (FUFOS).

BRENTE HULL OG SMÅ MENN - I IOWAS'S LANDDISTRIKTER (Burnt Holes and Small Men - In Iowa's Rural Districts)

This article is a supplement to material published in "Male" in April 1971, titled "Flying Saucers Burn Farm Properties in Iowa." It is written by Brad Steiger.

The article begins with a letter from a lineman working for an electric and power company in Iowa, who reported noticing a series of "burnt circles" near high-voltage power lines. When he inquired about this phenomenon at a nearby farm, the family stated they had seen UFOs hovering silently over the power lines and even landing in the fields. The lineman provided a sketch of the circular patterns and their measurements, offering to point out the location and assist in an investigation.

Glenn Mc Wane, a businessman from Iowa City and an independent UFO researcher, traveled to the farm in Clayton County, Iowa, on behalf of the author. He found that the fields and meadows belonging to the farm were covered with burnt circles, similar to those found on the Warren Barr farm in Iowa's Cedar Valley. The densest concentration of circles was found along the high-voltage power lines. A popular theory among some ufologists is that UFOs tap electrical power from these lines. The author notes that while this theory is supported by many circumstances, concrete proof from an electricity company spokesperson has never been obtained.

In addition to the burnt circles, McWane observed indentations that appeared to be caused by landing gear. He placed his cigarette lighter near one of these depressions, which was approximately 10 cm in diameter, to compare the size. Mr. S.H., the farmer, is described as a warm-hearted and friendly individual who seemed to have accepted the regular visits of UFOs without significant emotional distress. McWane assessed Mr. S.H. as a skilled farmer, calm, and unlikely to jump to hasty conclusions. Mr. S.H. had served in the military and was stationed at various missile bases across the USA. The farmer's family reported that "strange things" had been happening around the farm for the past two years, with neighbors also witnessing objects moving at high speed across the sky, then slowly descending towards fields and clearings in the forest.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the evolving nature of UFO research and organization. There is a clear shift from the more informal, association-based UFO groups of the past to a more structured, scientific approach exemplified by Norsk UFO Center. The magazine highlights the challenges of maintaining credibility and effectiveness in UFO research, contrasting the perceived shortcomings of traditional groups (e.g., focus on personal beliefs, lack of rigorous investigation) with the more systematic and evidence-based methodology of Norsk UFO Center. The editorial stance appears to favor scientific inquiry and empirical evidence over anecdotal accounts and speculative theories, as demonstrated by Norsk UFO Center's critique of older UFO organizations and their emphasis on verification and data collection. The issue also touches upon the international aspect of UFO research through mentions of cooperation with foreign organizations and scientists.

Title: NORSK UFO TIDSSKRIFT
Issue: 4/1970
Date: April 1970
Publisher: Norsk UFO Center

This issue of Norsk UFO Tidsskrift presents a collection of UFO sightings and encounters from various locations, along with expert analyses and witness testimonies. The magazine aims to document and investigate unexplained aerial phenomena.

Case Reports

S.H. Farm, Norway

The issue begins with an account from the S.H. family farm in Norway, where children observed a round, red object hovering near power lines. The object emitted a red light beam towards the boys. The following morning, a circular, scorched patch and imprints were discovered, suggesting a landing.

Navajo Indians, Idaho, USA

A detailed report describes an encounter by two Navajo Indians, Willie Begay and Guy Tossie, on November 2, 1967. They witnessed a UFO with a transparent dome land near their car. A small, green-faced occupant, about one meter tall and wearing a white suit and a yellow-brown helmet, emerged and appeared to float. The occupant's features were described as having a pale, greenish head, large eyes, and small slits for a nose and mouth. The UFO emitted green and orange light beams. The encounter caused their car to stall, and the object departed after the occupants re-entered.

Herr Ruffler, England

In September 1956, Herr Ruffler was cutting grass in Berkshire, England, when he observed an object described as a transparent, silver, raindrop-shaped object hovering about 5-7 meters away. He felt he was being watched. The object ascended rapidly and disappeared within minutes, with no sound heard.

Draguignan, France

This section details repeated UFO visits in southeastern France, specifically around Draguignan. A report from March 29, 1971, describes two musicians, Pierre Calafat and Andre Bouchaud, observing a large, red, disc-shaped UFO. Ground traces were later found, including a 5.60-meter diameter circle with flattened, discolored grass. Another report from 1965 also mentioned UFO overflights in the same area.

Les Nourradons, France

Bernhard Blanc recounts an experience in July 1971 at Les Nourradons, a location previously associated with UFO activity. He and friends experienced strange noises, intense heat, and a feeling of paralysis, followed by a bright flash and a sense of release. The location is noted for its history of alleged hauntings.

Cumberland, Rhode Island, USA

Joseph L. Ferriere, a UFO researcher, investigated sightings in Cumberland, Rhode Island. On July 3, 1967, he observed a large, shiny, rod-shaped object hovering silently. He took photographs of the object before it ascended vertically and disappeared. Ferriere had been collecting numerous UFO reports in the area.

Expert Opinions

Several experts provide their views on the reported cases:

• Dr. S. Mariner (Psychiatrist): Considers the cases, particularly the Navajo incident, highly convincing, noting the witnesses' panic and consistency under questioning. Believes UFOs exist.
• Dr. F.J. Manalac: Suggests differences in alien behavior might be due to their mission or different forms of existence. Notes their advanced technology.
• Dr. Norman Wolf (Biologist): Finds the Indian account credible, especially when corroborated by other witnesses. He points to the consistent descriptions of unusual beings, their floating movement, incomprehensible language, and peculiar facial features. He suggests the variety in descriptions could be due to visitors from different planets or nations.
• Mr. X (Psychologist): Believes the witnesses saw what they reported and were genuinely confused. He notes their willingness to report to the police but reluctance to go public. He considers the case credible due to the lack of electromagnetic interference.
• Dr. Y (Anthropologist): Compares the situation to the arrival of Europeans in North America, suggesting that understanding alien intentions is as difficult as it was for Native Americans to understand the Europeans. He finds the Indian report credible but notes the peculiar faces as unusual.
• Astronomer: Confirms the credibility of the accounts, stating that they present a choice between accepting these events or dismissing them as lies. The Indian report is considered one of the most convincing in UFO history.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue highlights the recurring nature of UFO visits to specific locations, suggesting that certain areas are preferred by UFOs. The magazine emphasizes the importance of collecting detailed reports and physical evidence. The editorial stance appears to be one of open investigation and a belief in the existence of UFOs, encouraging readers to contribute their own observations. The recurring theme is the persistent presence of unexplained aerial phenomena and the challenges in understanding their origin, purpose, and the nature of the beings involved.

Title: NORSK UFO TIDSSKRIFT
Issue: nr. 4/1970
Date: April 1970
Publisher: Norsk UFO Center
Country: Norway
Language: Norwegian

This issue of Norsk UFO Tidsskrift (Norwegian UFO Journal) focuses on a significant UFO sighting and includes commentary on the state of UFO organizations in Norway, as well as a catalog of UFO-related literature.

Witness Account: The Perriere Sighting

The main article details a UFO sighting by a witness named Perriere. Initially, Perriere observed a large, cigar-shaped object. After this object disappeared, his attention was drawn to a smaller, saucer-shaped object with a dome on top. Perriere managed to take two photographs of this second object before it vanished.

Perriere estimated the size of the objects. The initial cigar-shaped object was thought to be approximately 700 meters long. The subsequent saucer-shaped object was judged to be between 300 and 460 meters long, with a smaller object nearby estimated at 45 meters in diameter. The cigar-shaped object was described as having four lights along its side, which Perriere speculated might be vents or 'eyes' due to their translucent glow rather than being made of glass or plastic.

The observation period lasted between 3 to 4 minutes. A particularly striking aspect for Perriere was the complete silence of the objects. Even when the larger object abruptly shifted into a vertical position and ascended, it made no discernible noise.

The sighting occurred near a water reservoir, which the article notes is a common location for reported UFO observations, citing similar reports in Wanaqe, New Jersey. The article emphasizes that the only lasting evidence of such encounters is often the story itself, and in this case, Perriere claims photographic proof.

The article concludes by stating that the accompanying photographs have never been proven false, and Perriere's honesty is considered beyond doubt. The source of this report is attributed to Flying Saucer Review, June '73, and UFO Aspekt nr. 2/74, translated by Eva Erichsen. The author of this specific account is listed as August C. Roberts.

Norsk UFO Centers Kommenterer

This section provides commentary from the Norsk UFO Center, addressing issues within UFO organizations. The commentary notes a recurring problem of fragmentation and dissolution in such groups, often stemming from a prioritization of 'ideology' over scientific reasoning. It suggests that an organization with a strong scientific profile can develop its own 'ideology' organically from its research intentions and materials.

The commentary mentions an inquiry from a UFO organization named NUFOI, which refers to an existing UFO group in Norway. However, the Norsk UFO Center, having received the manuscript just before printing, was unaware of which specific organization NUFOI was referring to and thus could not provide an address. They mention hearing of one other such group led by Gunvald Weie in Oslo, questioning if it still exists.

Norsk UFO Center directs interested individuals to the "Norsk UFO-Center" section in the current issue, stating they may not offer much in terms of 'club life' but believe that serious enthusiasts will benefit from following "UFO Forum." They also welcome inquiries from individuals who could fill specific roles within NUFOC, indicating numerous opportunities.

Norsk UFO Center's Principles:

• Provides its members with training in field research.
• Grants access to special courses through "Projekt U. R. D.," which trains its own field researchers.
• Operates its total activities within the framework of legally established statutes and instructions, but does not prevent its members from holding independent opinions.
• Does not engage in systematic brainwashing, and leadership does not lose composure if a member expresses an individual opinion.
• Does not market 'ideologies.'

Publication Information

Details are provided for "NORSK UFO-TIDSSKRIFT nr. 1/1970," which was the first and only volume of its year. It was published by Norsk UFO Center on behalf of the former Trondheim UFO-Forening and NUFOI, Oslo. The editor was K. Stenødegård, and it was printed by Norsk UFO Center Sørlandet, Arendal. The journal, which ran for one year (1970), was replaced starting in 1973 by "UFO FORUM," with the address UFO FORUM, Postboks 2119, 7001 Trondheim.

UFO-Litteratur & Astroarkæologi

This section lists a catalog of UFO-related books available for purchase from "Valby Antikvariat & Bogimport" in Denmark. The books are categorized by language:

Danish Titles:

• UFO-LANDINGER I DANMARK by Willy Wegner (kr. 21,50)
• UFO-ORIENTERING by F. Pedersen & I.O. Kjems (kr. 8,50)
• UFO'ER OVER SPANIEN OG PORTUGAL by Olmos & Vallee (kr. 13,90)
• UFO-MYTEN OG DE PSYKISKE FENOMENER by Trench (kr. 25,00)
• DE FREMMEDE RUMSKIBE OG VOR FREMTID by Adamski (kr. 20,85)
• GEORGE ADAMSKI BERETTER II edited by H. C. Petersen (kr. 52,15)
• SPØGELSESPLANETEN by John A. Keel, pocket (kr. 16,10)
• MYSTISKE FREMMEDE by Jacques Bergier (kr. 25,00)
• FORSVUNDEN TEKNIK by Henry Kjellson (kr. 25,00)
• TUT-ANKH-AMON ER VÅGNET by Frede Melhedegård (kr. 20,00)
• PÅ TÆRSKELEN TIL VENDELIGE VERDENER by A. Tomas (kr. 33,70)
• FORTIDS GÅDERS FORKLARING by Gerhard Gadow (kr. 20,00)
• STRIDEN OM ATLANTIS by Gerhard Gadow (kr. 30,00)
• DEN HULE JORD by Eric Norman (kr. 36,50)

Swedish Titles:

• UFO OCH BIBELN by M. K. Jessup (kr. 22,25)
• FLYGANDE TEFAT... VAD SAGER VETENSKAPEN? by Sven Magnussen, hardcover (kr. 54,90)
• DE FLYGANDE TEFATEN - Dokument och teori by K. Gösta Rehn (kr. 25,15)
• UFO! NYA FAKTA OM DE FLYGANDE TEFATEN by K. Gösta Rehn (kr. 25,15)
• TEFATSFOLKET SER OSS by Staffan Stigsjöö (kr. 47,65)
• TEFATSFOLKET - VANNER ELLER FIENDER? by Stigsjöö (kr. 51,95)
• FAKTA OM DE FLYGANDE TEFAT OCH DERES DRIVMETODER by Wilbert B. Smith, hardcover (kr. 25,15)
• UFO OCH RELATIVITETSTEORIN by Borgny Tingstedt (kr. 31,75)
• UFO-GÅTAN by Bjarne Håkansson (kr. 31,75)
• DE OTROLIGA TEPATEN by Eugen Semitjov, hardcover (kr. 66,00)
• BUDSKAPET FRÅN RYMDEN by Daniel W. Fry, pocket (kr. 10,80)
• RESA MED FLYGANDE TEFAT by Daniel W. Fry, pocket (kr. 10,80)
• OMBORD PÅ RYMDSKEPP by George Adamski, hardcover (kr. 36,50)

All prices are in Danish kroner excluding VAT. Contact information for Valby Antikvariat & Bogimport is provided.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around detailed UFO sighting reports, the critical examination of UFO phenomena, and the organizational challenges within the UFO community. The editorial stance, as expressed by Norsk UFO Center, clearly favors a scientific and evidence-based approach to UFO research, cautioning against ideological biases and promoting rigorous field investigation. The publication also serves as a conduit for disseminating information about UFO literature, suggesting a broad interest in the subject matter across various cultural contexts (Danish, Swedish, and international).