AI Magazine Summary

Mysteres De L'Est - No 11 - 2007

Summary & Cover Mysteres De L'Est

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You’re on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

20,263

issue summaries

Free. Always.

Support the Archive

Building and maintaining this collection is something I genuinely enjoy. If you’ve found it useful and want to say thanks, a small contribution keeps me motivated to keep expanding it. Thank you for your kindness 💚

Donate with PayPal

AI-Generated Summary

Overview

Title: LES MYSTÈRES DE L'EST Issue: N°11 Year: 2007 Publisher: CNEGU (Comité Nord-Est des Groupes Ufologiques) Type: Ufology Bulletin

Magazine Overview

Title: LES MYSTÈRES DE L'EST
Issue: N°11
Year: 2007
Publisher: CNEGU (Comité Nord-Est des Groupes Ufologiques)
Type: Ufology Bulletin

Editorial

The editorial, written by Patrick Fournel, addresses the perception of CNEGU as a group of 'debunkers' or skeptics. Fournel asserts that CNEGU's approach is pragmatic, aiming to find plausible explanations for UFO cases rather than immediately jumping to conclusions about flying saucers. He emphasizes that only a small percentage of reported UFO cases are truly unidentified. The editorial includes a reprinted text from the 1954 journal 'L'Indépendant du Louhannais et du Jura' by 'Fidus', which discusses the phenomenon of 'soucoupite' (saucer-mania) and presents a skeptical yet analytical view. Fidus argues that many sightings can be attributed to misidentification, psychological factors, or hoaxes, but acknowledges that a significant number of people report inexplicable phenomena. The text also touches upon the lack of UFO sightings reported by specialized observatories and dismisses alien visitations as pure invention, linking them to fictional portrayals. The editorial concludes by hoping that the public's fascination with flying saucers might rekindle an interest in understanding the world around us.

CNEGU - Ufology

This section introduces the CNEGU, a committee formed in 1978 by ufological associations in northeastern France to coordinate regional research. The CNEGU's primary activity involves verifying UFO sighting testimonies through investigations and inquiries. They aim to develop a rational methodology for analyzing information about the phenomenon. The committee has compiled regional catalogs of observations and conducted specific studies, particularly concerning the Champagne, Ardennes, Bourgogne, and Lorraine regions. CNEGU actively cooperates with other researchers and public organizations. They also publish their findings in 'Les Mystères de l'Est' and maintain a website.

The presentation lists the members of CNEGU as Ghyslaine Bonnier, Francine Cordier, Patrick Fournel, Renaud Leclet, Eric Maillot, Gilles Munsch, Raoul Robé, Thierry Rocher, and Christine Zwygart. It also lists past member associations, including ADRUP, AIHPI, CIGU, CLEU, CVLDLN, GAU, GEPO, GHREPA, GPUN, GROUPE 5255, and ONA. Furthermore, CNEGU was instrumental in creating the VECA group (Voyage d'Etude des Cercles en Angleterre) and supports the SCEAU's efforts to preserve ufological heritage.

Rectificatifs concernant « Les Mystères de l'Est » N°10

This section provides corrections for errors found in the previous issue (N°10). It includes a correction regarding the passing of Renaud Leclet, an article on the 'UMMO affair' where a computer problem caused confusion in page references, and corrections for an article titled 'L'ovni du président' concerning the Castel Porziano 1963 sighting. The latter includes specific text corrections and notes the omission of illustrations.

Les Travaux du CNEGU

This section details the research and activities undertaken by CNEGU. It features several articles:

  • Un triangle belge au-dessus de Paris: By Raoul Robé, this article describes a triangular object with three white lights and a flashing red central light observed over Paris on May 26, 2006. The object was seen at a low altitude, estimated to be below 1200m, and approached from the northwest before moving towards the northeast.
  • Enquête de Toul: An investigation into a sighting in Toul.
  • Dora récidive à Nancy (54): A report on a recurring event involving 'Dora' in Nancy.
  • Dora Magazine: A mention of 'Dora Magazine'.
  • L'humanoïde de Toul (54): An article focusing on a humanoid sighting in Toul.
  • Une similitude troublante: Photo réelle ou fiction ?: An article examining a potentially misleading photograph.
  • A propos des lumières de Venelles (13): An analysis of lights observed in Venelles.
  • 81ème, 82ème, 83ème sessions du CNEGU: Reports on the CNEGU's regular sessions.
  • Rapport VECA : ses principes à nouveau vérifiés à Hesse (57): A report on the VECA group's principles verified in Hesse.

Les Ovni dans la presse

This section presents a 'Revue de presse' (Press Review), summarizing how UFOs are reported in various media outlets.

Manifestations diverses

This part covers various ufological events:

  • Les Premières Rencontres Ufologiques Européennes: Details of the First European Ufological Encounters.
  • Premier congrès fortéen parisien: Information about a Parisian congress related to the Fortean phenomenon.
  • Repas ufologiques dans notre région: Ufological gatherings in the region.

CNEGU & Media

This section highlights CNEGU's engagement with media:

  • Lorsque Cuarto Milenio s'intéresse à l'ufologie française: How the program 'Cuarto Milenio' covered French ufology.
  • Le Journal de la Haute-Marne: Coverage in the local newspaper.
  • L'expérience Direct 8: An experience related to the Direct 8 television channel.
  • La photo du cheval affolé par un ovni: Analysis of a photograph depicting a horse frightened by a UFO.

La tribune de l'extérieur

This section features contributions from outside CNEGU:

  • Crop Circles - Vérités et contre-vérités !: An article discussing crop circles, separating facts from fiction.
  • L'ovni de président: An article by Jean-Marc Donnadieu and Bruno Mancusi about a UFO sighting related to a president.

Le courrier des lecteurs

This section includes reader correspondence:

  • Retour sur la photo du cheval affolé par un ovni: A follow-up on the photo of the horse frightened by a UFO, by Michel Granger.

Le pêle-mêle

The 'pêle-mêle' section contains a collection of diverse items:

  • Pêle-mêle: General miscellaneous items.
  • L'affaire de Trans-en-Provence: Discussion of the Trans-en-Provence UFO case.
  • Les OVNI du CNES: Information about UFOs as reported by the CNES.
  • Publication CNEGU : Dossier Marliens: A CNEGU publication on the Marliens case.
  • Publication CNEGU : Connaissance des motifs de l'imagerie soucoupique dans les populations rurales de l'est algérien: A CNEGU publication on saucer imagery in rural Algeria.
  • Publication du SCEAU: A publication by SCEAU, involving J-M. Abrassart, SERPAN, and B. Bousquet.
  • Temps libre: Leisure-related content.
  • Humorous pages: Pages signed by Raoul Robé (Ralrob).

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around UFO investigations, analysis of sightings, media coverage of ufology, and the presentation of diverse cases from France and other regions. The editorial stance, as articulated by Patrick Fournel, is one of pragmatic inquiry, seeking rational explanations while acknowledging the existence of genuinely unexplained phenomena. There is a clear emphasis on rigorous methodology and the importance of separating credible evidence from speculation or misidentification. The publication also highlights the collaborative nature of ufological research through its various sections and mentions of affiliated groups and individuals.

This document details investigations into two purported UFO sightings, focusing on the analysis and potential rationalization of these events. The primary case, occurring on October 23, 2005, in Toul, France, involved a witness who filmed a phenomenon initially described as a triangular object and later as a human-like silhouette. The secondary case, from Nancy, France, on September 6, 2006, involved a witness reporting a silver humanoid shape in the sky.

Case 1: Toul, France (October 23, 2005)

The article begins with a description of the object observed in Toul: a triangle with rounded corners, a wide border, three fixed white lights at the angles, and a central red flashing light. The body was dark grey. The witness compared it to the Belgian UFO from Petit Rechain but noted the rounded angles. A graphical reconstruction of the phenomenon was attempted, showing a triangular shape. The estimated size at arm's length was 2 degrees.

A sketch made the same evening depicts the phases of the observation, including directional information (North, NE) and references to landmarks like the Eiffel Tower and Montparnasse Tower. A later "Reconstitution avec photo" section on page 2 provides a visual representation of the event, dated Friday, May 26, 2006, 23:45 Paris time, suggesting a connection to the original observation.

The "Carte des lieux" (Map of the locations) on page 2 shows Paris and its surroundings, with a green sector and a red trajectory superimposed, highlighting the Eiffel Tower and Montparnasse Tower as being circled in red. The angle of vision is described as the green sector plus the hypothetical trajectory of the object (red arrow).

Page 3, titled "Encore des vérifications et ... la solution !" (More checks and... the solution!), reveals the investigator's conclusion that the sighting was likely an "illusion d'optique" (optical illusion). The trajectory of the observed object was found to be consistent with an aerial corridor leading to Roissy Airport. The witness observed two airliners with three white lights and a flashing red light, which, due to atmospheric conditions, were perceived as a single, unusual triangle.

The investigator, Michel Monnerie, is cited for his work on UFOs. Experts from Paris Airport confirmed that a B777-300 aircraft had flown over Montrouge at an altitude of 2800m, 7 km away from the witness's location. The investigator admits to not having noticed the regular air traffic from 23:30 onwards, despite being an "observateur averti" (informed observer). The experience led the investigator to believe that the Belgian triangles from the famous wave were likely misidentifications of aircraft.

Case 2: Nancy, France (September 6, 2006)

Page 4 introduces a second case, "Observation du 23-10-2005 à TOUL - 54200 (Film d'humanoïde volant)", but the content on this page shifts to a different investigation concerning a "flying humanoid" observed in Nancy. The report is by Francine Cordier and Patrice Seray. The initial information came from Raoul Robé, who learned of a "flying humanoid" observation presented on France 3 television, filmed with a camcorder.

An internet search identified a probable explanation: a children's balloon named "Dora," a popular comic book character. The investigation aimed to identify the witness, whose name was not initially public. The report details how the investigators, Francine Cordier, Patrice Seray, and Gilles Munsch, contacted the witness's mother and arranged to meet the witness, identified as "Monsieur C...", in Toul.

During the meeting, Monsieur C... discussed the observation and agreed to provide a video copy. He confirmed that his neighbor, a tobacconist, had alerted the gendarmerie. The tobacconist, intrigued by the images, had also contacted the media, leading to a TV report.

Pages 5 and 6 detail the on-site investigation in Toul. The witness, Monsieur C..., took his camcorder on a walk with two other people on October 23, 2005, around 6 PM. They observed a curious shape in the sky that detached itself from the blue background. The object appeared material, moved slowly from right to left, and seemed flat with discernible arms and legs, and a backpack-like protuberance. The witness estimated its altitude at about 200 meters and its distance as not great. He filmed the phenomenon for 26 seconds, zooming in, and observed its disappearance with the naked eye. Other people present did not notice anything unusual.

No particular noise was noted. The witness discussed the event with his tobacconist neighbor, who then contacted the gendarmerie and later the TV station. The tobacconist, skeptical of the official explanation involving a balloon, asked his friend (Monsieur C..., a window decorator) to paint a message on his shop window.

Page 6 includes a photo of the tobacconist's decorated Christmas window with the painted message: "On October 23 at 6 PM, a strange object was observed. Many claim in contradiction to the ridiculed witnesses that it was a fairground balloon!? Perhaps on the evening of December 24, they will see a 'Santa Claus' flying over the rooftops!!! Be sure to check the wind direction!"

Detailed data includes azimuths of appearance (~174°/NM) and disappearance (~110°/NM), as well as angular heights of electrical and telephone cables, which helped estimate the object's angular height at around 14°.

Pages 7 and 8 provide geographical context using IGN maps. The location of the observation in Toul is pinpointed, along with the probable origin of the object from the "Foire d'automne" (Autumn Fair) at Porte de Metz. The maps show the trajectory and the witness's location near the "Gymnase + Témoins" (Gymnasium + Witnesses).

Page 9 presents a comparison between images of the "Dora" balloon and the video extract. The montage demonstrates how the balloon could be mistaken for the observed phenomenon, explaining the degradation of details due to backlighting, distance, and video resolution. The article concludes that the initial intuition of a misidentification with a children's balloon is confirmed, contrary to the claims of some private ufologists.

Second Nancy Case (Pages 10-11)

Pages 10 and 11 detail a separate case from Nancy, reported by Sophie G. on September 6, 2006. She observed a "flying humanoid" shape in the blue sky while doing dishes. The object, described as silver-colored with a head, torso, two arms, and two legs, moved slowly towards the west. She thought it might be a weather probe but dismissed it as they are typically white and spherical. Her husband also saw the object. Sophie took three photos of the phenomenon, which lasted 2-3 minutes. She was unable to find an explanation through her research.

The investigators, Francine Cordier and Patrice Seray, contacted the association that received the testimony and arranged an on-site investigation. On September 15, 2006, they met with Sophie G. in Nancy. She lives in a building on the heights of Nancy, and her kitchen window overlooks the southwest. She described the object as a humanoid mass floating in the air, slightly to her left (260° OSO) at an angular height of about 4°. The object moved slowly to her right, progressively moving away. The report includes the three photos taken by Sophie G.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout these investigations is the potential for misidentification of conventional aerial phenomena, particularly aircraft and balloons, as UFOs. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical analysis and rationalization, seeking plausible explanations for sightings. The investigators emphasize meticulous research, on-site examination, and comparison with known objects and atmospheric conditions. The document highlights the role of media in both reporting and potentially sensationalizing such events, and the skepticism of some witnesses towards rational explanations. The publication seems to advocate for a scientific approach to ufology, prioritizing evidence and logical deduction over speculation.

This issue of DORA MAGAZINE focuses on an investigation into a reported UFO sighting that occurred in Toul, France, on October 23, 2005. The magazine, edited by Thierry Rocher and published by A.L.M., presents this case as an example of 'UFO mimicry' and explores how common objects, like children's balloons, can be mistaken for extraterrestrial phenomena.

The Toul Incident: A Witness Account and Photographic Evidence

The case begins with a description from a witness named Sophie, who observed a humanoid-like figure in the sky. She described it as an aluminum-colored object with a darker body, featuring two arms and two legs, and possibly dark circles for eyes or hair. The object appeared to move from west to east. Sophie managed to take three photographs of the phenomenon using a Kodak DX 360 digital camera. These photos, numbered 1064 to 1066, are presented as key evidence, with photo 1066 being the most precise due to maximum zoom and the object's frontal presentation.

Sophie reported no audible sounds during the observation, which lasted approximately two minutes. She also noted an effect of the character seemingly turning on itself, which became more evident in the later photos.

Analysis of the Photographs and Identification as a 'Dora' Balloon

The magazine's analysis strongly suggests that the observed object was a 'Dora' balloon, a popular children's toy based on the character from an American animated series. The shape, particularly in photo 1066, is described as 'Dora'-like, resembling the character in profile. The investigators note that this case bears resemblance to a previous incident in Toul, which was also attributed to a 'Dora' balloon.

Detailed examination of the photos and on-site verification were conducted. The initial sighting was reported at an angular height of 4° at azimuth 260° OSO, but photo 1064 appears to contradict this, showing the object at a higher angular height of 15/20°. The disappearance was noted at azimuth 270°/N with a 0° angular height, consistent with the object moving away. The trajectory was traced from Laxou to Vandoeuvre-Villers, both in France.

Meteorological Data and Wind Analysis

The magazine includes meteorological data for Nancy-Essey to analyze wind conditions at the time of the sighting. The data indicates a wind from the West-South-West (WSW) to West-North-West (WNW) sector, with speeds ranging from 11 to 30 km/h. This wind direction is considered consistent with the object moving eastward, away from the witness. The analysis concludes that the wind conditions do not contradict the hypothesis of a balloon.

Critique of Other Investigations and Media Coverage

The article also critiques an investigation by F. Pouillot of LDLN, suggesting that Pouillot's methods were superficial, relying on phone calls and internet searches rather than on-site verification. The authors argue that Pouillot's conclusion that the object was not a simple child's balloon was premature and based on flawed reasoning, particularly regarding wind direction. They highlight that many online forums identified the object as a balloon, contrary to Pouillot's assertion.

The 'Dora' Phenomenon and Commercialization

The magazine details the commercial success of the 'Dora' character, which originated from a 2000 American animated series and was broadcast in France in 2003. Dora's popularity led to a wide range of merchandise, including balloons. A bi-monthly magazine, 'Dora Magazine,' was launched in November 2004, with issue number 10 in May-June 2006 titled 'Dora dans l'espace.' This issue features stories and games related to Dora and her adventures, including a narrative about helping extraterrestrials with a broken flying saucer.

Conclusion: The Case of the 'Dora' Balloon

The authors conclude that the Toul incident, and a similar one in Nancy, are not mysterious UFO encounters but rather misidentifications of 'Dora' balloons. They emphasize the importance of thorough, on-site investigation and lament the rarity of such diligent work in ufology, contrasting it with the proliferation of unsubstantiated claims. The article suggests that the desire for the extraordinary can lead people to 'find' it, even when a simple explanation is available. The issue includes a photograph of a 'Dora' balloon at an autumn fair in Nancy-Parc de la Pépinière in October 2007, further illustrating the prevalence of these balloons.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout this issue is the concept of 'UFO mimicry,' where mundane objects are mistaken for advanced aerial phenomena. The editorial stance is critical of superficial investigations and sensationalism in ufology, advocating for rigorous, evidence-based analysis. The magazine champions the identification of plausible, non-extraterrestrial explanations for sightings, particularly when supported by photographic and meteorological data, and highlights the commercial and cultural factors that can contribute to such misidentifications.

This issue of the magazine, dated October 2006, features a cover story titled "UNE SIMILITUDE TROUBLANTE : PHOTO RÉELLE OU FICTION ?" by Raoul Robé. The issue also includes reports on the CNEGU's 81st and 82nd sessions, detailing their activities and preparations for ufology events.

Cover Story: UNE SIMILITUDE TROUBLANTE : PHOTO RÉELLE OU FICTION ?

The cover story by Raoul Robé explores a striking similarity between a 1967 spy film, 'Matt Helm Traqué,' and a photograph taken in Costa Rica on September 4, 1971. The film, starring Matt Helm, features a scenario where a super-spy confronts a dictator aiming for world domination. This dictator manages to hijack a prototype flying saucer from the American army during a test flight. The article juxtaposes this fictional element with the real photograph from Costa Rica, which appears to show a disc-like object plunging into the sea off the coast of South America. The author questions whether this is a coincidence.

Article: A propos des lumières de Venelles (13)

This article, authored by Francine Cordier and Patrice Seray, investigates a UFO sighting in Venelles, France, that occurred in early July 1999. A witness reported observing a group of up to nine luminous balls evolving in large circles in the sky. The witness managed to film a short sequence of the event, which lasted between 5 and 10 minutes. The objects were described as white luminous balls, sometimes forming a triangle, and were seen below the cloud mass. No positional lights (red or green) were visible, but a crackling sound was heard upon their departure. The article notes that this sighting bears a strong resemblance to another filmed event near Marseille on July 4, 2003, which also featured nine luminous balls in a similar formation.

The authors then explore the possibility that these sightings were misidentifications of aircraft. They reference an article in 'Lumières Dans La Nuit' (LDLN) that suggested the Venelles sighting could be explained by the presence of nine Alphajet aircraft from the Patrouille de France. However, the article points out that the Patrouille de France typically trains from mid-November to mid-April and not at night, making a July night flight unlikely.

Through correspondence with the Patrouille de France, it is revealed that while the PAF does not typically fly at night, they do conduct night training for the 'Ecole de l'air' (Air Force School) graduation ceremonies in early July. This explanation aligns with the filmed image and suggests that the Venelles and Marseille sightings were indeed misidentifications of Patrouille de France aircraft during these training exercises. The article concludes that LDLN may have had inaccurate information.

Article: 81ª SESSION DU CNEGU

This report by Thierry Rocher details the 81st session of the CNEGU, held on July 2-3, 2005, in the Vosges region. The internal meeting, without external guests, focused on preparing for the European Ufology Encounters in Châlons en Champagne (October 14-16). Activities included finalizing exhibition panels, updating display materials, and reviewing documents. The group also planned to visit a cereal pictogram discovered near Corcieux and meet with researcher Michel Padrines. They discussed contacting Ginette (Sandra) Gravier to acquire part of her ufological library. The session involved reviewing the 'Mystères De l'Est' publication, discussing the GEPAN (Groupe d'Etudes et d'Information sur les Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non identifiés), and working on new exhibition panels. They also followed up on contacts related to a meteorite fall in February 2005 and reviewed a slideshow created by Gilles Munsch for a conference.

Article: 82º SESSION DU CNEGU

Thierry Rocher reports on the 82nd session of the CNEGU, held on October 1-2, 2005. The team, consisting of Raoul Robé, Patrick Fournel, Gilles Munsch, Isabelle Dumas, and Thierry Rocher, focused on preparing their stand and participation for the European Ufology Encounters in Châlons en Champagne. The session involved confirming attendance, refining the schedule, and finalizing 'Mystères De l'Est' publications. They also discussed accommodation in Châlons and the new GEPAN. Preparations included creating observation forms, translating presentation pages, and organizing sales of CNEGU productions. The team worked on stand layout, panel placement, and the logistics of the event, including managing inquiries, interviews, and meals. They also planned to create a 29th panel and document the session for future reference.

Article: 83º SESSION DU CNEGU

This report by Thierry Rocher covers the 83rd session of the CNEGU, held on April 29-30, 2006. The session, which was delayed from the previous winter, involved internal work without external guests. The team, including Eric Maillot, focused on financial matters, stock inventory, and reviewing received publications. They discussed ongoing orders, including one from Michel Granger, and Thierry Rocher shared his epistolary contacts with the journalist Robert Charroux. A significant part of the session was dedicated to the digital advancement of 'Mystères De l'Est,' including discussions on diffusion methods (paper, CD, website) and a potential redesign of the CNEGU website. They also reviewed the progress of 'MDE' n°11, discussing finalized articles, ongoing investigations, and potential new sections. The team engaged in simultaneous tasks, such as correcting articles, resolving IT issues, and researching on the internet.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around UFO sightings, their potential misidentification, and the ongoing work of ufological research groups like the CNEGU. The magazine appears to adopt a critical yet open-minded stance, investigating sightings thoroughly and seeking rational explanations, particularly those involving aviation. The CNEGU's activities highlight the practical aspects of ufological research, including event preparation, publication management, and collaborative investigation.

This issue of Cahiers Zététiques, identified as number 65, focuses heavily on ufology and related phenomena, particularly the investigation of crop circles and a review of press articles concerning UFO sightings. The primary content is a detailed report by the VECA group on a crop circle found in Hesse, Moselle, France. The issue also includes a compilation of UFO-related news items and reports on specific historical cases.

VECA Report: Crop Circles in Hesse (Moselle)

The report, authored by Francine Cordier, Gilles Munsch, and Patrice Seray, details the VECA group's investigation of a crop circle that appeared near Sarrebourg in late May 2007. The group visited the site on June 2, 2007, despite adverse weather conditions. They interviewed the farmer who owned the field and had previously agreed to their visit. The report outlines the group's findings based on eight principles developed by Gilles Munsch for characterizing crop circles:

1. Principle of Visibility: The crop circle was located near a road, with accessible parking and a path leading to the field, making it easily visible and discoverable. Its placement on a slope also aided visibility from the road. The proximity of a small aerodrome was also noted.
2. Principle of Economy: An easy and rapid access path (tramline) led to the field, with no fencing. The formation itself was created in a sequential manner, suggesting the use of planks or rollers.
3. Principle of Limitation: The concentric circles were formed by anti-clockwise passes, suggesting the use of planks or rollers. Holes observed in the center, along with lodged stalks, indicated the use of stakes and ropes, and the chronology of construction was evident from the overlapping patterns.
4. Principle of Optimism: The report suggests that the creators made strategic errors, such as parking too close to the road, which led to a witness observing their vehicles and the individuals involved. The creators also left a visible 'path' of flattened stalks, which they likely intended to cover later.
5. Principle of Fallibility: The crop circle, measuring 60 meters in diameter, showed variations in its dimensions (± 20 cm). Numerous defects in its shape, circularity, and symmetry were observed. A rechargeable battery was found within the lodged stalks, and the farmer discovered a lighter near the access path, suggesting these items might have been lost by the 'circle makers'.
6. Principle of Feed-back: The investigation revealed that two previous, less successful attempts at creating crop circles had been noted in the vicinity. These were kept quiet by the farmers involved and were located in discreet, hard-to-see areas, possibly representing earlier trials. There is also a mention of a circle-making group possibly existing near Strasbourg.
7. Principle of Imitation: The motif of the crop circle was not original, appearing to be a variation of existing complex figures, possibly inspired by Yin and Yang. The method and technique used were clearly copied from established practices seen in England and elsewhere.
8. Principle of Indiscernibility: The report states that no definitive criteria currently exist to distinguish between a 'true' and a 'false' crop circle, as claims of authenticity often lack tangible proof.

The conclusion of the VECA report is that the Hesse agroglyph does not contradict the principles established by the VECA group, but rather reinforces the idea of human involvement in their creation. While lacking mystery, the figures retain their aesthetic appeal. The report speculates that if the creators had been more discreet in their approach, the formation might not have been identified as artificial.

Other Content

CNEGU Activities and Future Plans

On page 1, there is a discussion of CNEGU's activities, including reviewing photos, discussing past cases like Cussac and Trans-en-Provence, and examining a documentary on UFOs. The group also discussed the failed regional cooperation attempt regarding the 2005 meteorite observation. They are working on digitizing and computerizing photographs from CNEGU sessions and cataloging CNEGU archives. Plans for upcoming sessions (84th and 85th) are mentioned, including determining format, location, and dates.

Michel Figuet's Work

A portion of Michel Figuet's work is being transferred to Burgundy and will be returned to Thierry Pinvidic. This relates to a special CNEGU issue dedicated to Thierry's work on "Knowledge of the motifs of soucoupique imagery in rural populations of eastern Algeria – Contribution to the study of stereotype dispersion." The process involved data entry, review, and finalization by Thierry.

Review of Press Articles (Ufology)

Pages 8 and 9 present a comprehensive list of press articles related to ufology published between August 2005 and August 2007. These articles cover a wide range of topics, including specific UFO sightings, witness testimonies, investigations by organizations like CNES (which reopened its study of unidentified aerospace phenomena), and discussions on the decline of the ufology movement. Locations mentioned include St Joseph, Châlons, Avesnois, Landrecies, Brest, Reims, Nolay, St Sernin-du-Bois, and St Léger-lès-Paray.

Related Articles (Non-UFO)

Page 9 also lists articles related to UFOs but not directly about sightings, such as SETI@home's conclusion of its search for ET, discussions on the possibility of Earth being a cosmic zoo, a meteorite event, a publicity stunt involving an alien theme, and articles on sects, extraterrestrial jewelry, and drones.

Specific Cases Mentioned

  • Gué-d'Hossus and Broyes (Aisne, Marne, Ardennes): Page 9 details two investigations by Jean-Jacques Vélasco. In Gué-d'Hossus (March 5-6, 1994), two men were surprised by a strong luminous source leaving traces. In Broyes (January 10, 2000), a strong light hovered over a car, causing the engine, headlights, and radio to stop, a phenomenon similar to that depicted in Spielberg's 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind'. The witness in the Broyes case was deemed credible by the gendarmes.

"The Little Green Men... in Nancy"

Page 10 features an article from L'Est Républicain (August 26, 2007) about a "ufo meal" organized by Rémy Bodeux in Nancy, bringing together people interested in Unidentified Flying Objects. The article mentions that Nancy is the latest city to host such events after Paris, Marseille, Toulouse, and Strasbourg.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are crop circles, UFO sightings, and the broader field of ufology. The editorial stance, as reflected in the VECA report and the selection of press articles, appears to be one of critical investigation and a tendency to favor explanations involving human activity or natural phenomena over purely exotic or extraterrestrial origins, particularly in the case of crop circles. However, the inclusion of historical UFO case reports and the acknowledgment of ongoing public fascination with the subject indicate an open-minded approach to the phenomenon itself. The magazine seems to aim at providing detailed analysis and reporting on UFO-related events and research.

Title: L'Yonne Républicaine
Issue Date: December 2, 2006
Section: AUTOUR D'AUXERRE
Character: Local newspaper covering a story on ufology.

Main Article: "L'ufologie dans la peau"

The article introduces Rémy Fauchereau, a 53-year-old resident of Le Ponceau in Charbuy, who has been passionate about UFOs since the age of 16. A trained biologist and currently a caregiver, Fauchereau is dedicated to collecting testimonies of unidentified flying object (OVNI) sightings within the Yonne region. He places advertisements and notices seeking witnesses, assuring anonymity.

Fauchereau identifies himself as a rationalist and skeptic, distancing himself from what he calls 'cult-like' ufology and 'soucoupistes' (saucer-worshippers). He is a member of several ufological organizations, including the SCEAU (Sauvegarde, conservation des études et archives ufologiques), which he states does not defend any particular hypothesis in ufology. He criticizes the religious fervor surrounding UFOs in the United States and expresses disbelief in the Roswell incident of 1947, suggesting it might have been a manipulation to facilitate public acceptance of NASA funding.

Since 1998, Fauchereau has meticulously documented hundreds of testimonies from the Yonne region. He records witness accounts on magnetic tape and paper, supplementing them with sketches, maps, photographs of the sighting locations, relevant weather data, and detailed questionnaires. Among the most striking testimonies is one from Neuvy-Sautour, where a person described seeing what they called a 'city' in the sky. Fauchereau notes that most witnesses report seeing luminous spheres, triangles, or cigar-shaped objects.

He acknowledges that some sightings can be explained as misidentifications, such as satellites (like the ISS), airplanes, or the planet Venus. Statistically, Fauchereau estimates that only 20% of reported cases remain unexplained, but he believes that these might be rationally explained in the future. He collects these documents because he believes they could be of interest to future researchers in physics or the psychosociology of witnesses. He plans to publish several booklets and two volumes dedicated to UFO phenomena as reported in the Yonne press. Despite his extensive work, Fauchereau states he has never personally seen a UFO, reiterating his rationalist stance: "I believe what I see."

The article also provides contact information for Rémy Fauchereau.

Report on the "Premières Rencontres Ufologiques Européennes"

The latter part of the document details the "Premières Rencontres Ufologiques Européennes" (First European Ufological Encounters) held in Châlons-en-Champagne from October 14-16, 2005. The event, organized by OVNI Marne and others, was a significant gathering for ufologists across Europe.

The author, Thierry Rocher, describes the immense exhibition hall, noting its dimensions and the extensive setup required for the event. He mentions the participation of various ufological associations and groups, including CNEGU, SCEAU, OVNI Marne, and international organizations.

The program spanned three days, with numerous conferences and debates held in different rooms (Salle n°1, Salle n°2, Salle n°3). Topics covered a wide range, from the psychology of witnesses ('La fantasy-prone personality') and the analysis of extraterrestrial intrusions to the history of ufology in various countries (France, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Netherlands, Czech Republic), the Roswell incident, UFOs in art and culture, and the phenomenon of abductions.

Notable speakers included Budd Hopkins, Miles Johnston, Vicente Juan Ballester Olmos, Jean-Luc Rivera, Didier Gomez, and many others. The event also featured a European UFO research network (EuroUfo) colloquium and a press conference.

The report highlights the logistical efforts involved, including the setup of stands, the coordination of speakers, and the provision of services like catering and translation. The author notes that the program underwent several modifications and that the publication of the conference proceedings was ultimately canceled due to insufficient submitted texts.

Despite the challenges, the event provided a platform for ufologists to share information, discuss research, and connect with the public. The author's personal account details the atmosphere, the interactions with colleagues, and the overall experience of participating in such a large-scale ufological event.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are ufology, UFO sightings, and the rational investigation of unexplained aerial phenomena. The editorial stance, as represented by the main article on Rémy Fauchereau and the report on the Châlons conference, leans towards a skeptical and rational approach to ufology. While acknowledging the existence of unexplained phenomena and the dedication of researchers, the focus is on evidence-based investigation, critical analysis, and the separation of serious research from sensationalism or cult-like beliefs. The magazine appears to promote a balanced perspective, encouraging scientific inquiry into the UFO phenomenon.

This document is a report titled "PREMIER CONGRES FORTEEN PARISIEN" by Thierry Rocher, detailing the events of a conference held on Saturday, October 14, 2006, in Paris. The event took place in a small courtyard at 62 avenue de la Grande Armée, in a salon provided by Madame Christiane Peugeot.

Conference Details and Organization The conference, organized by Jean-Luc Rivera, was scheduled to start precisely at 10 AM. Places were reserved in advance for 10 euros. The venue could accommodate about fifty seated attendees. The report notes the 'classy' neighborhood and the 'modern and flashy' artwork decorating the walls. Jean-Claude Venturini and the author arrived early and had coffee. Raoul Robé also joined them. Philippe Marlin assisted the organizer with verifying reservations. The seating arrangement allowed for a clear view of the speakers and space for note-taking and photography without disturbing others. Jean-Luc Rivera aimed to adhere strictly to the schedule, with interventions expected to be rich enough to generate questions and debates.

Speakers and Presentations

François de Sarre Jean-Luc Rivera introduced the first speaker, François de Sarre, who discussed "initial bipedalism and its links with the question of Unknown Hominids." His presentation included documentary projections and drawings by the artist himself. De Sarre proposed that humans originated from an aquatic homunculus that became terrestrial, leading to branches that might include apes, unknown hominids, and humans. The presentation was followed by a 10-minute Q&A session and a break.

Bertrand Méheust At 11:40 AM, Bertrand Méheust was presented by Jean-Luc Rivera. Méheust summarized his career, starting with UFOs and science fiction, and his exploration of messmerism and somnambulism, eventually leading to metapsychics. He presented a synthetic overview of the paranormal, including receptive psi, retro-projective psi, and macro-psi. Méheust highlighted that phenomena related to psi face a specific French ostracism. He described the situation as 'appalling,' with the study of this domain being 'expelled from France' despite a vast corpus of historical data. He provided examples of official reactions to psi and mentioned extensively studied mediums whose research dossiers contain thousands of pages.

Michel Meurger and Yves Lignon's Intervention Following Méheust's presentation, Michel Meurger, described as Bertrand's 'eternal contradicter,' engaged in a debate. Meurger suggested that Méheust's bipolar thesis, while essential, overlooked heterogeneous cultural elements, and that the issue was more complex, involving conflicts within culture and counter-culture. Yves Lignon added that psi phenomena are lived experiences, not supernatural, and questioned Méheust's interest in Near-Death Experiences (NDEs).

Bertrand Méheust's Book and Further Discussion Bertrand Méheust announced he was finishing a book on Aimé Michel, due in spring 2007. The discussion then shifted to remote viewing, Ingo Swann, and American military parapsychology.

Fabrice Bonvin After a lunch break, at 2:10 PM, Fabrice Bonvin presented. Having previously presented his work at Châlons a year prior, Bonvin discussed his professional and ufological journey, focusing on humanoid observations and abduction cases, supported by screen illustrations. He covered the evolution and appearance of apparitions, key dates in abduction sagas, and facts highlighted by the speaker, including global spectra, social classes, correlation with reproductive functions, and trans-generational phenomena. Bonvin proposed that the phenomenon is an "adaptation to the zeitgeist as well as individual and collective representations." He drew parallels between folklore (fairies) and extraterrestrials, and discussed temporal distortion and amnesia in relation to folklore. He also mentioned hybrid children and multiple witness observations.

Fabrice Bonvin's Theory on Abductions Bonvin presented a list of 13 invariances he extracted from abduction data, suggesting these are "the means by which an intelligence has chosen to transmit symbolic messages to us." He drew parallels with the work of J.V. (Jacques Vallée) and discussed folklore elements like incubi, succubi, djinns, and Marian apparitions, finding common ground with humanoids and abductions. His conclusion emphasized the notion of 'intelligence' influencing humans for centuries and advocated for an interdisciplinary approach, historical perspective, isolation of invariants, and suspension of preconceived notions.

Public Questions and Comments Following Bonvin's presentation, a Q&A session allowed the public to ask questions. Topics included the symbolic nature of intelligence, the status of American abductions (stagnant), the use of the term 'supernatural,' NDEs, and the comparison of British folklore with extraterrestrial cases. Michel Meurger commented on Bonvin's presentation, noting its focus on the 'technology' aspect and suggesting the need for examples from other countries beyond American and Celtic folklore. Gilles Durand saw science fiction as a bridge between folklore and modern ufology. Thibaut Colin discussed animal apparitions and shamanism, and Daniel Castille suggested a more historical perspective, referencing medieval nature spirits and the Agobard affair.

Patrick Huyghe At 3:41 PM, Patrick Huyghe, described as an American ufologist, cryptozoologist, parapsychologist, journalist, and writer, was introduced. Huyghe spoke about the decline of major US ufological organizations like CUFOS and MUFON due to the internet, and the loss of financial support. He noted that research is increasingly individual and focused on history. He also discussed the cryptozoology field as being rich in organizations and well-subsidized, while parapsychology faces financial challenges. He described the situation of the Fortéenne group as 'even sadder,' with only two people involved and no desire for help.

Further Discussions and Inquiries Jean-Luc Rivera initiated a debate with Patrick Huyghe, asking about John Keel and George Adamski's photographs. Huyghe mentioned leaving messages for Keel and that Adamski's photos were likely black and white, with a later film in color. Huyghe shared his personal interest in UFOs began in 1966 after observing a cone-shaped object. He expressed hope for the growth of ufology in France, noting the existence of a scientific association studying the unusual. He also commented on Jacques Vallée's current standing in the US and the difference in how investigations are conducted in the US versus France.

Media Coverage The document extensively lists media coverage of the "Rencontres Ufologiques Européennes" in Châlons-en-Champagne, including articles in newspapers like Le Figaro Magazine, Le Dauphiné, La Croix, Libération, Le Monde, L'Union, and various Swiss and regional publications. Radio coverage included France Bleu, RPL de Metz, NRJ, Cigale FM Champagne, Choc FM (Quebec), RTL, RFM, Champagne FM, France Info, Europe 2, and German public radio. Television coverage featured Paranews.net, France 2's "Télématin," TV8 Mont Blanc, France 3 Lorraine-Champagne Ardennes, France 3 Alsace, France 3 Reims, CVS Télévision, France 5, Canal 32, and France 3 Toulouse. Documentaries were produced by a Lyon-based team, a southern team, and Thomas Lerat for Artubys. Online media included www.7areims.com, Science-Fiction Magazine, Le Mague.net, and Altour-Romandie News.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance The report expresses a critical view of the commercialization and 'ufophile' aspect of the "Rencontres Ufologiques Européennes" in Châlons, suggesting it detracted from the serious scientific study of UFOs. The author contrasts this with the more intellectual and sober approach taken by some European ufologists. There's a recurring theme of the challenges faced by ufological research in gaining public and media acceptance, with some media outlets portrayed as dismissive or sensationalist. The report also highlights the importance of international cooperation among researchers and the use of modern technology to facilitate data exchange and archival efforts. The author's stance appears to favor a rational, scientific approach to ufology, distancing it from sensationalism and pseudoscience, while acknowledging the value of historical research and interdisciplinary perspectives. The report concludes with a hope for future "Second Encounters."

This issue of La Gazette Fortéenne delves into various aspects of cryptozoology, Forteanism, and ufology, featuring discussions, reports on events, and interviews.

Key Articles and Discussions

Cryptozoology and Forteanism

Benoît Grison opens the discussion by defining cryptozoology not as the science of living fossils, but as a part of ethno-zoology, comprising observers and popular knowledge. He notes that while many high-level biologists are interested, they hesitate to publish under the 'crypto-zoology' label due to psycho-sociological blocks. Grison mentions that the field has been reduced to major themes like Bigfoot and Loch Ness, but also highlights localized cases like the Almasty. He discusses the 'sea serpent' case as a distinct element, originating from Scandinavian folklore and becoming a zoological element in the 19th century, questioning the connection between folklore and observations. Grison also details an investigation in Newfoundland concerning a marine animal with a horse-like head, mane, and nostrils, deeming the case stable with reliable witnesses, though acknowledging that scientific reluctance is partly due to labeling and media hype. He points out that while cryptozoological successes like the okapi or coelacanth are numerous, the major, long-standing cases have seen no significant developments in fifty years.

Michel Meurger presents his conference titled 'From Charles Fort to Forteanism,' emphasizing that Charles Fort was not a collector of oddities but a significant writer whose work influenced the imaginary, alongside figures like H.G. Wells and Howard Phillips Lovecraft. Meurger clarifies that Fort was not the first ufologist, as sometimes claimed, and that his interest spanned multiple subjects without necessarily investigating them deeply. He critiques the popular image of Fort created by Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier, stating it's not the reality. Meurger then discusses Forteanism, mentioning figures like Yvan Sanderson and John Keel, and the launch of Fortean Times in 1973. He highlights that La Gazette Fortéenne has had a positive effect in France, attracting people and fostering a generalist spirit. He acknowledges that these research efforts require significant energy and continuous effort, and that there are many phenomena to study. Meurger also touches upon the commercialization of Fortean Times in England, suggesting that new contributors might be more journalists than true Fortéans.

Regarding Forteanism in other countries, Meurger notes it's embryonic in Spanish-speaking countries, with isolated brilliant individuals in Italy, and virtually non-existent in Germany. He finds France to be in a relatively good position. He also discusses the influence of Charles Fort's quote, 'humanity is the stake in a cosmic war,' and the connection between alien abductions, science fiction, and the development of pulps in the US, which amplified these ideas later found in ufology. Meurger stresses the importance of studying these influences, even if difficult, and praises the persistent, meticulous work of researchers.

Meurger views the internet as both a boon and a bane for information gathering. While excellent for purchases, it can lead students to believe they can find everything without effort. He advocates for the 'ant-like' research method, comparing internet users to 'flying ants.' He emphasizes the constant effort behind Fortean Times and the need for new blood in the field, citing Benoît Grison as an example. He warns against the 'cold death' of the field due to aging individuals.

UFO Reports and Events

Reports on 'Repas Ufologiques' (Ufology Dinners) are featured. The first event took place in Nancy on January 22, 2007, organized by Youri Bodeux, attracting about twenty people, including a delegation from Paris and Christian Comtesse. The event was cut short when the restaurant had to close. The 'Repas de Nancy' team was formed, and attendees expressed interest in future meetings.

A second 'Repas Ufologique' was held in Saint-Dié-des-Vosges on February 15, 2007, organized by Bernard Fayard, with about twenty attendees from various cities. Gérard Lebat presented the national concept of 'Repas Ufologiques,' and Christian Comtesse explained the Strasbourg meetings, held monthly. Michel Padrines presented his book 'OVNI: Générations UFO,' which compiles press articles on UFO sightings in France in 1954, particularly in Alsace. He noted that despite few official gendarmerie reports from Alsace in 1954, his research uncovered several testimonies. Padrines also announced plans for future Ufology Dinners in Colmar.

Interview with Cuarto Milenio

An interview with the Spanish TV show 'Cuarto Milenio,' hosted by Iker Jimenez, is detailed. Journalists Raoul and Pablo Villarrubia interviewed Thierry Rocher and others in Paris. The interview covered French ufology, the evolution and current rarity of UFO phenomena, and personal opinions on the phenomenon's origins. The discussion also touched upon the UMMO affair and specific cases like the Franck Fontaine pseudo-abduction and the Joao Prestes Filho case from 1946. The Spanish journalists also collaborated with publications like 'Ano Cero.' The interview process, including filming and logistics, is described, highlighting the challenges and the eventual camaraderie.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently promotes a Fortean approach, encouraging rigorous research, open-mindedness to unusual phenomena, and a continuous effort to understand the unexplained. There's an emphasis on the importance of popular knowledge and historical accounts alongside scientific investigation, while also acknowledging the challenges and skepticism faced by these fields. The editorial stance appears to be one of fostering a community for discussing and investigating paranormal and anomalous phenomena, encouraging new researchers, and preserving the legacy of figures like Charles Fort.

Title: Journal de la Haute Marne
Issue Date: Thursday, October 26, 2006
Theme: UFOs, Crop Circles, and Ufology

This issue of the Journal de la Haute Marne delves into the intriguing world of unexplained aerial phenomena, focusing on local sightings, the enduring mystery of crop circles, and the challenges of investigating these subjects. It features a blend of personal accounts, investigative reports, and discussions on how these topics are presented in the media.

Cover Story: Did They Dream of Another World?

The cover story, "Ont-ils rêvé d'un autre monde ?" (Did They Dream of Another World?), highlights that some individuals, including celebrities, claim to have witnessed UFOs, even in the Haute-Marne region. The article suggests that numerous testimonies of third-type encounters exist, posing questions about their veracity and the potential for future interactions. It touches upon the spectrum of UFO reports, from those that are easily explained to those that remain perplexing.

Notable Sightings and Cases

The magazine presents several accounts, including a report from the AFP (Agence France-Presse) about a sighting in Haute-Marne in October 1994, where a mason observed a powerful light and later found a flattened circular area in a field. Another case mentioned is from September 1968, involving a "frightened horse" photograph taken in Spain, which later revealed unusual objects in the sky. The article also references the "case of the Amarante" and an observation by Jimmy Carter.

The CNEGU and Ufological Investigations

The "Le Cnegu à l'affût" (The CNEGU on the Lookout) section introduces the Comité Nord-Est des Groupes Ufologiques (CNEGU), a group that has been collecting UFO observations since 1998. It mentions their collaboration with researchers from Lorraine, Champagne, and Burgundy. The article highlights the CNEGU's involvement in the VECA investigation, which focused on crop circles between 1989 and 1994 across several European countries. The VECA report established eight principles for analyzing crop circles, which, according to the article, have not been disproven and are expected to be widely disseminated soon.

Media and Ufology: The Direct 8 Experience

Thierry Rocher recounts his experience being interviewed for the TV show "Tout va bien" on Direct 8. He details the negotiation process with the journalist, Julien Ansault, and his initial apprehension about how ufology would be presented. Rocher aimed to defend ufology and discuss the CNEGU's research. The article touches upon the challenges of media engagement, including the need for witnesses to trust television and the potential for sensationalism. Rocher mentions other guests on the show, such as Jacques Patenet from GEIPAN and Stéphane Allix, who discussed abductions. The interview was filmed at Rocher's home, with a backdrop of his UFO-related book collection. The segment on "Tout va bien" was brief, approximately 1 minute 30 seconds, and focused on the seriousness of the CNEGU group and scientific research. Rocher expresses a mixed reaction to the show's overall presentation, noting the hosts' costumes and the eclectic mix of topics.

Crop Circles: Truths and Falsehoods

Jean-Marc Donnadieu, also known as NEMROD34, contributes an article titled "Les Crop Circles: Vérités et contre vérités !" (Crop Circles: Truths and Falsehoods). He discusses various theories surrounding crop circles, including human creation, extraterrestrial involvement, military testing, and ancient rituals. Donnadieu leans towards the theory of human creation, citing the VECA investigation's findings. He notes that animals seem unaffected by crop circles, contradicting claims that they avoid them due to harmful effects. The article also mentions the VECA report's principles and the group's experiences investigating crop circles, including sleeping in them without issue.

The "Frightened Horse" Photo Case Analysis

Michel Granger analyzes the 1968 "frightened horse" photo case. He details the account of André Bernier, who photographed a scene in Spain and later discovered unusual objects in the sky on the developed slide, which also exhibited a strange yellow hue. The analysis by SOBEPS (Société Belge d'Étude des Phénomènes Spatiaux) concluded that the photo was unlikely to be a hoax. However, Granger presents a later hypothesis from 2003 by CNEGU members, suggesting the witness might have been mistaken about the time of day or the film used, leading to misinterpretations of reflections. A key discovery in 1986 by ufologist Jean-Luc Vertongen pointed to a museum display case as the likely source of the reflections, explaining the "objects" and the yellow cast of the sky, suggesting the case was a misinterpretation rather than a genuine UFO sighting.

La Tribune de l'Extérieur: CNEGU's Stance

A section titled "LA TRIBUNE DE L'EXTERIEUR" (The Tribune from the Outside) outlines the CNEGU's policy for publishing external contributions. The CNEGU welcomes opinions from anyone, regardless of their ufological views. Articles will not be published if they contain incorrect statements, exceed the limits of politeness and respect, involve a refusal of reciprocity from the author, or if there is a lack of space. The CNEGU emphasizes that published articles represent the authors' views and not necessarily those of the committee.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the investigation of unexplained phenomena, particularly UFOs and crop circles. There's a clear focus on presenting different theories and evidence, from eyewitness accounts to scientific analysis. The magazine appears to adopt a stance that encourages critical examination of claims, as seen in the detailed analysis of the "frightened horse" photo. While acknowledging the existence of numerous reports and the passion of ufologists, the publication seems to favor explanations that are grounded in evidence and logical deduction, particularly highlighting human agency in the creation of crop circles. The inclusion of media experiences also points to an awareness of how these topics are disseminated to the public and the challenges involved in maintaining a serious approach.

This document, titled "Les principes de VECA" (The VECA Principles) by Gilles Munsch, presents an in-depth analysis of crop circles. It outlines eight principles developed by the VECA group over five years of investigation, aiming to reveal the 'human' characteristics that betray the origin of these phenomena. The issue date is noted as July 20, 1993, with a visit to Stonehenge on July 20, 1993, and a discovery date of July 10, 1991, for a crop circle there.

The VECA Principles

The article systematically details each of the eight principles:

P1 - Principle of Visibility: This principle posits that crop circles are created to be seen, not for artistic ego. They are frequently found near roads or tourist sites (like Avebury, Stonehenge, Silbury Hill) and are often placed on hillsides or in valleys to enhance their visual appeal and attract attention. The author notes that while this was a primary factor before 1990, media attention and systematic aerial research have made it a 'secondary' principle, as 'crop researchers' now inform the press.

P2 - Principle of Economy (or 'Least Effort'): This principle addresses the operational aspects of creating a crop circle. It is described as risky, illegal, and secret, requiring significant physical effort, concentration, stress, and often occurring at unusual hours. Therefore, the 'team' must act quickly, leave no visible traces (other than the figure itself), communicate minimally, use a well-developed and transferable method, plan the motif and procedure in advance, and optimize movements to reduce time and length. Logical consequences include figures being located at field edges, accessible for motorized vehicles, with discreet parking, easy field access (avoiding fences), and using tramlines for access. Motifs are created in 'continuity' to avoid backtracking, using minimal, rudimentary equipment, and recurring locations are favored for efficiency, despite the risk of being caught.

P3 - Principle of 'Limitation': This principle suggests that human limitations are observable in crop circle creation. Geographical limitations (e.g., Hampshire and Wiltshire) and the dimensions achievable with available tools (including the human body) are noted. Recurring dimensions, like the width of a foot or person, or the length of a rope, are common. The creation process is not random but follows a precise chronology from a starting point to one or more arrival points, with overlaps indicating the construction sequence. The intelligence behind these figures uses practical geometry rules, making complex-looking shapes achievable. The circle, a basic element, is easy to produce with a center and radius.

P4 - Principle of 'Optimism' (or 'Naivety'): This principle suggests that crop circle creators, whether by choice or negligence, assume certain points will be overlooked or misinterpreted. These assumptions include that hidden traces won't be discovered, the overall logic won't be sought or understood, and that the evolution of figures will obscure any human origin. The author implies that the VECA group actively seeks to understand and uncover these aspects.

P5 - Principle of 'Fallibility': Humans inevitably make mistakes or commit blunders, and their work reflects these imperfections. Factors like nighttime conditions, illegal status, terrain difficulties, coordination issues, and the handover of tasks can lead to 'manufacturing defects.' These defects, such as unfinished figures, abnormal traces (unflattened stalks, access/retreat marks), geometric flaws (symmetry, alignment, rectitude, circularity), and orientation errors (e.g., arrows pointing incorrectly), should be observable. The pictogram at Barbury Castle (1991) is cited as an example with visible defects. The author notes that modern super-pictograms also have defects, but observers often focus on symbolism rather than details.

P6 - Principle of 'Feed-back': This principle assumes that crop circle creators are interested in the reactions of the public, media, and authorities. Consequently, signs of 'readjustment' in the phenomenon are expected. This includes evolving figures to maintain media interest or to counter hypotheses from researchers, making them obsolete. Examples include the shift in alignment of pictogrammes relative to tramlines from 1990 to 1991. The recurrence of 'anniversary dates' is also seen as a human-like symbolic reaction.

P7 - Principle of Imitation: It is acknowledged that many figures are created by humans using various techniques, acting by an 'instinct of imitation' unless motivated by experimental research or contests. The author suggests that humans have always imitated each other, making this principle significant when considered alongside others.

P8 - Principle of 'Indiscernibility': Despite claims, no clear protocol exists to definitively differentiate a 'true' (non-human) crop circle from a 'fake' (human-made) one. This suggests the original phenomenon may not be clearly characterized, or humans have become so adept at imitation that indiscernibility is achieved. The author questions whether the original phenomenon is too simple, or if imitators are simply mirroring their model.

Case Studies and Critiques

The document includes detailed analyses of specific crop circles, such as the one at Stonehenge (1991) and Barbury Castle (1991), illustrating the application of the VECA principles. The Stonehenge detail, termed an 'échelle' (ladder), shows alternating stalk laying for faster creation, demonstrating P2. The Barbury Castle pictogram is highlighted for its numerous VECA characteristics, including easy access (P2), simple chronology (P3), hidden paths (P4), geometric defects (P5), and being an example of 'surenchère' (escalation) (P6).

The article also critically examines scientific arguments used to support the non-human origin of crop circles, particularly the claim of microwave effects on plants. The author scrutinizes studies by 'Dr.' Levengood and E. H. Haselhoff, accusing them of methodological errors, biased research, and misrepresenting possibilities as proven facts. The document points out that Levengood was not a doctor at the time of his report and that Haselhoff's work, while published in a peer-reviewed journal, allegedly involved data manipulation and a lack of scientific rigor. The author argues that simple mechanical explanations, such as the use of rollers or planks, are often overlooked.

Another common argument, the presence of dead animals and insects in crop circles, is also addressed. The author dismisses claims of 'grilled hedgehogs' as unsubstantiated and suggests that insect deaths are often due to natural causes like the fungus *Entomophthora muscae*, as identified by Francesco Grassi.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout the document is the critical examination of crop circle phenomena, with a strong inclination towards identifying human involvement and debunking claims of purely extraterrestrial or unexplained origins. The author consistently applies the VECA principles to deconstruct the mystery, emphasizing observable evidence and logical deduction over speculation. The editorial stance is skeptical of the 'mystery' surrounding crop circles, advocating for a scientific and methodical approach that acknowledges human ingenuity and fallibility. The document concludes by posing questions about whether extraterrestrial intelligence or spirits are losing interest or are simply out of the picture, suggesting that the complexity of the phenomenon might be less than assumed, or that human imitation has reached a sophisticated level.

This document, likely an issue of "Top Secret" magazine, focuses on debunking the mysterious origins of crop circles and presenting evidence for their human creation by 'circlemakers'. It critically analyzes various claims and phenomena associated with crop circles, offering rational explanations.

Animal Behavior and Crop Circles The article begins by addressing the contradiction that while some claim animals avoid crop circles, others report finding dead animals within them. It notes that observations with VECA and internet videos show animals having no issues with crop circles. Anecdotes of dogs acting strangely near crop circles are mentioned, but the author points out the lack of serious studies or statistics to confirm these observations.

The 'Impossible Entanglement' Claim A frequently repeated claim is that the plant stalks in crop circles show entanglements impossible to achieve by flattening them with planks. The author humorously suggests a tribe of 'romanichels' might be responsible for a publicity stunt. However, the author states they have never found a single photo of such interlaced crops. They explain that the visual effect of different directions of flattened wheat can create optical illusions of 3D designs, and that tramlines, used by tractors, can be used by 'circle-makers' to access the center of the field without leaving obvious tracks.

Alleged High Temperatures Another claim discussed is that the soil under crop circles in Edmonton was crystallized, requiring 600 to 800°C, which the author questions as a method for flattening crops.

Mineralogical Evidence Debunked Patrick Gross is credited for his research on the topic. A claim by Dr. Sampath Iyengar, a mineralogist from San Diego, suggested that clay samples from crop circles showed crystallization patterns requiring geological pressures over millions of years. The author dismisses this as a recurring 're-hash' of a single study, creating an illusion of multiple scientific proofs.

Strange Sounds Reports of bizarre sounds recorded at crop circles are examined. An instance in 1989 at Cheesefoot Head, recorded by C.N.E.G.U., was later identified as a 'locustelle' (a type of bird mimicking insect sounds). Despite this identification, the information was reportedly ignored by some proponents of mystery.

Subjective Experiences The article addresses claims that people and animals experience sensations or malaise in crop circles. The author argues that these experiences are subjective and influenced by autosuggestion, particularly for those already convinced of a mystery. They question the measurability and predictability of such phenomena.

Persistent 'Phantom Traces' Claims of 'phantom traces' of crop circles persisting into the following year are discussed. Patrick Gross is again cited for his work. The author explains these traces can be due to fallen seeds germinating, or the growth of grass that depletes soil nutrients and hinders cereal growth. Fungi and diseases can also thrive on flattened vegetation.

Farmer's Practices An objection that farmers till their fields annually, erasing traces, is countered by stating that farmers do not always till deeply every year. The author suggests farmers themselves are the true specialists of crop circles.

Light Balls and Crops The argument that light balls have been filmed creating crops is dismissed. The author analyzes a video from Oliver's Castle, suggesting it might be a bird or a poorly filmed object. Another video is analyzed, and the author expresses skepticism about its authenticity, suggesting it could be a montage.

The 'Circlemakers' Hypothesis The article strongly supports the 'circlemakers' hypothesis, identifying Doug Bower and Dave Chorley as early creators. It discusses the recurring small signs or 'signatures' found on crop circles, suggesting they were used by competing teams of cropmakers to claim their work. The author proposes that some of these signatures, like paired half-circles, might represent 'Doug and Dave'.

Examples of Circlemaker Signatures Several examples of crop circles from 1991 are presented with their 'signatures', including Preshute Down, West Overton, Upton Scudamore, Great Wishford, Cheesefoot Head, and Chilcomb Down. The article notes that the 'D' signature is sometimes mentioned.

Demonstrations of Human Creation The document highlights instances where crop circles were demonstrably created by humans. One example is a crop circle near Oxenwood, Wiltshire, dated August 7, 2005, which was claimed to be non-human. However, it is revealed that this crop was actually made on August 5, 2000, at Farm World, Erddig, and filmed by Channel 4 using infrared cameras. The artists, Rod Dickinson, John Lundberg, and Wil Russell, even advertised the design beforehand.

VECA's Role and Investigations Gilles Munsch of the VECA group is mentioned for his efforts to demonstrate the human origin of crop circles. He recounts an encounter with a group of 'skeptics' from Southampton who aimed to prove that specialists could not differentiate between real and fake crop circles. VECA shared information and observed the creation of a crop at Shaw Farm, which was later validated by specialists as 'real'.

Nighttime Crop Circle Creation The article presents evidence of crop circles being made at night, without lights, and even in the rain. Examples include a BBC video showing circlemakers filming at night and another from a RTBF emission showing five people creating a crop in Waterloo.

Debunking the 'Damage' Argument A common argument against human creation is that 'fake' crops show damage from mechanical flattening with planks, while 'authentic' ones do not. The author dismisses this by pointing to tools like garden rollers, which can create crops efficiently with minimal immediately perceptible traces.

Complexity and Geometry The complexity of crop circles is addressed, with the assertion that they are based on elementary geometry and fractals. Gilles Munsch of VECA is said to be capable of reconstructing the chronology of most agroglyphs. Software for creating fractals and a 'circle-maker' guide are mentioned.

Why Not Caught? The question of why circlemakers are not caught is answered by noting that farmers are not always present in their fields at night and lack surveillance systems. However, the article states that circlemakers have been caught, citing an unfinished rosette-shaped circle made near Cherhill on August 3, 2002.

Perfection is Subjective The claim that crop circles are too perfect to be made by humans is challenged. The author argues that perfection is subjective and that our perception can be deceived. They state that crop circles are not perfect.

Time of Creation The time it takes to create a crop circle is discussed. While some incredible stories mention 15-minute creations, the author notes that demonstrations under controlled conditions show that the time is shorter than one might imagine. Patrick Gross's work is again referenced for verifying reports.

Motivations for Creation The motivation behind creating crop circles, even without direct revendication or profit, is compared to that of artists like Vincent Van Gogh. The act of creation, the theories it sparks, and the attention it draws can be sufficient motivation. Some circlemakers do, however, operate as a business, creating crops for advertising and films.

Historical Context The article addresses the claim that crop circles are ancient. It argues that true crop circles (circles, not just flattened wheat) are primarily a phenomenon of the 1980s onwards. Older stories, like the 'devil's mower', are dismissed as social satire or misinterpretations of natural phenomena like 'lodging' (verse des blés) or fairy rings (mushrooms).

SETI and Military Intervention A specific example of an agroglyph created on July 24, 1991, near Hackpen Hill, spelling 'Talk to us', is presented as a counter-example. The VECA team infiltrated the group and verified the creation process. The author questions the idea that crop circles are evidence of military intervention or extraterrestrial ('ziti') activity, suggesting that their resemblance to old symbols is due to other reasons.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance The recurring themes in this issue are the debunking of paranormal and extraterrestrial explanations for crop circles, the emphasis on human agency ('circlemakers'), and the critical analysis of evidence. The editorial stance is clearly skeptical, advocating for rational explanations and scientific investigation over unsubstantiated claims. The author consistently promotes the idea that crop circles are a form of art, a social phenomenon, or even a business, rather than evidence of the unknown.

This issue of UFO (CISU) features a cover story titled "Alors à qui ça profite ?" (Who benefits from it?), questioning the motives behind the crop circle phenomenon and its commercialization. The main article, "L'ovni du président" (The President's UFO), by Paolo Fiorino, details a controversial UFO sighting at Castel Porziano, Italy, in 1963, near the residence of the Italian President.

Cover Story: Who Benefits from Crop Circles?

The cover story highlights how various entities profit from crop circles. Farmers charge admission to their fields, while businesses sell merchandise related to crop circles. Internet specialists organize conferences and publish books. Tour operators offer 'crop circle tours.' The article also notes the involvement of spiritualists and channelers who capitalize on people's desire for dreams and wonder. A significant concern raised is the potential exploitation of the phenomenon by New Age groups and cults, such as the Raëlians, who use crop circles and the internet to recruit members.

The author expresses a desire to awaken critical thinking and reflection, stating that this article is written without personal financial gain, even from entities like the CIA. The piece emphasizes the importance of critical analysis in understanding such phenomena.

Article: The President's UFO - Castel Porziano 1963

Paolo Fiorino's article investigates a UFO sighting that allegedly occurred in 1963 at Castel Porziano, the Italian President's hunting reserve near Rome. The primary witness was the chauffeur of President Antonio Segni, who was driving the official car.

The Incident and Initial Reports

According to the account, the chauffeur saw what he initially thought was an airplane landing. The object, described as a circular shadow or an umbrella-like shape, hovered over the car, causing vibrations. It then changed direction and altitude before disappearing. The object was described as a metallic, dark, saucer-shaped craft, approximately 20 meters in size, with a central tower and portholes.

Jacques Vallée first reported this incident in his 1975 book, "The Invisible College," but omitted the date and location, leading to speculation. Italian ufologist Marco Marianti later published the information without commentary. German ufologist Johannes von Buttlar criticized Vallée for not providing more details.

Conflicting Accounts and Investigations

In 1983, Jean Bernard presented a paper suggesting the incident occurred in France, related to General de Gaulle's residence, an assertion heavily criticized by French ufologists.

In 1974, journalist Gianni Bisiach, during a radio broadcast, mentioned a similar episode involving a prominent Italian politician. Bisiach stated that the politician, who was a friend and confided in him as a doctor, had witnessed a circular shadow over his car near Ostie. Bisiach, however, did not reveal the politician's name due to professional ethics.

Roberto Pinotti, an Italian ufologist, connected Bisiach's account to Vallée's report, believing it to be the same event at the presidential residence. Pinotti published this in "Rivista Aeronautica" in 1983. However, Pinotti's account mixed details from Vallée and Bisiach and introduced new, unverified elements.

Discrepancies and Analysis

Further investigation revealed significant discrepancies:

  • Witness Identity: Vallée identified the witness as the presidential chauffeur. Bisiach claimed the witness was a politician he knew, who approached him as a doctor. Pinotti later stated the witness was a deputy close to President Giuseppe Saragat.
  • Date and Time: Vallée cited August 20, 1963, at 9:32 PM, based on a letter from Igino Gatti. Bisiach placed the event in July of an unspecified year, during the afternoon ('jour'). Pinotti, in 1991, suggested the incident occurred during President Saragat's term (post-1964).
  • Location: Vallée placed it at Castel Porziano. Bisiach mentioned the Rome-Ostie road, and while Castel Porziano was suggested, he was vague.
  • Phenomenon Description: Vallée described a disc-shaped object. Bisiach's witness initially saw a circular shadow that followed the car precisely, later described as an immobile disc when the car stopped.

Igino Gatti, a privat-docent of statistics at the University of Rome and UFO consultant for the Italian Air Force's intelligence services, confirmed to the authors that he was the 'Captain Luciano' mentioned by Vallée. Gatti stated that the incident did indeed occur at Castel Porziano but was reluctant to provide further details due to the sensitive nature of his role.

Other Sightings and Conclusion

The article also briefly mentions other UFO sightings in the Castel Porziano area in 1968. The authors conclude that while the discrepancies make it difficult to definitively link all accounts, the investigation requires patience and rigorous verification, cautioning against recycling unverified information.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue strongly emphasizes critical thinking and skepticism towards sensational claims, particularly concerning UFOs and crop circles. It highlights the commercial exploitation of these phenomena and the potential for manipulation by various groups. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious investigation, seeking verifiable evidence and questioning unsubstantiated theories, while acknowledging the possibility of genuine unexplained events. The article on the Castel Porziano incident exemplifies this approach by meticulously dissecting conflicting testimonies and historical records.

This issue, dated March 2006, is presented by O.P. Editions and features content related to UFOs and science fiction, primarily focusing on the works of Jacques Vallée. The cover prominently displays "Le collège invisible" and "Science Interdite - Journal 1957-1969," with a bold headline suggesting an external force influencing humanity.

Le collège invisible

The book "Le collège invisible" by Jacques Vallée is introduced, highlighting a secret group of scientists studying unexplained phenomena for 25 years and their assertion of an alien influence on humanity. The cover art depicts a stylized flying object.

Science Interdite

Another work by Jacques Vallée, "Science Interdite," is presented as a journal from 1957-1969, suggesting a collection of research or observations from that period.

Plan des lieux

A map titled "Plan des lieux" is included, showing an area around Rome, Italy, with various locations marked, including Acilia, Tevere, Eur, Lido di Ostia, and Castel Porziano. The purpose of this map within the context of the magazine is not explicitly stated but might relate to a specific case study or location mentioned.

Le Courrier des Lecteurs

This section features an email from correspondent Michel Granger, dated February 21, 2006. Granger discusses a photo in Robert Charroux's book "Le Livre du Passé Mystérieux" (1973), page 465, which depicts a horse seemingly startled by a squadron of saucers. Granger argues that the image is actually a backlight effect on the camera lens, not a genuine UFO sighting, and that the horse's reaction is a common response to being asked to back up. He commends this interpretation as common sense, especially considering Charroux's reputation for imagination. The section also references articles by Patrice Seray & Francine Cordier, Jean-Luc Vertongen, and Thierry Rocher in "Les Mystères De l'Est" magazine.

Le Pêle-mêle

This section is a collection of diverse short items:

Raël entarté...

An excerpt from Noël Godin's book "Entartons, entartons les pompeux cornichons !" (2005) is mentioned, detailing an event involving Raël on December 25, 1998, described as a "Tarte-en-chef" celebrating the 25th anniversary of his "third type encounter" with a "big soft flan named Yahvé."

Un journal parodique

"The Roswell Daily News," issue number 1, dated January 2006, is presented as a parody newspaper with a fictional date of April 1, 2012. It contains hoaxes and false information on political and entertainment topics, including headlines about Jacques Chirac leaving prison and "The Great Return of the Calf's Head."

Filmographie...

  • Several films with UFO and humanoid themes are discussed:
  • "Grégoire Moulin contre l'humanité" (2002), a French comedy, ends with a poetic scene of the protagonists on the Moon with "little grays."
  • "That Darn Punk" (2001), an American film by Jeff Richardson, tells the story of a punk musician's delirium across the USA, featuring a scene with flying saucers in the desert reviving a killed policeman.
  • A "Flip Book OVNI" from Fliptomania (1997) is mentioned, which is a small booklet that creates the illusion of movement when flipped.

Discographie...

Vinyl album covers are noted as occasional sources of UFO-themed artwork. The cover of the Foo-Fighters' 1995 album is highlighted.

Publicité...

Advertisers are increasingly using UFO themes to emphasize modernity. Examples include ads with "Extra-terrestres," "A deux, c'est mieux!" and "Comme venu d'ailleurs." A Swiss popular science book for youth with two flying saucers on the cover (likely from the 1960s-70s) is also shown.

Livres...

Monsieur Gyger, curator of the Museum of the Elsewhere and Imaginary Worlds in Yverdon, Switzerland, has published a book on the history of flying cars. The section includes images of various flying vehicle concepts.

Encore au cinéma...

A screening at the Cinémathèque Française in Paris featured the Italian comedy "Les heures de l'Amour" (1963). A scene depicts a husband reading a newspaper about flying saucers seen by a pilot, but the wife dismisses the witness as a notorious alcoholic.

Presse de Science Fiction...

The first issue of the new magazine "Sci Fi magazine" (October 26, 2006) is reviewed. It includes articles on UFOs and a revelation about "Alien Autopsy," a film about the fake Roswell ET autopsy. The fake corpse was created by John Humphreys, who admitted to working on the fake documentary by Ray Santelli. This information, surprisingly, was not widely reported in UFO media.

Science Fiction de 1968

Franck Herbert's 1968 novel "Les fabricants d'Eden" is discussed. The story involves a flying saucer observing a murder in a small US town. A psychologist realizes the killer is trapped by police. An invisible flying craft monitors the situation. The novel explores advanced, immortal extraterrestrials (the Chems) who are interested in humanity, spying on them, and influencing events. These beings record human dramas and violent actions for their own entertainment, and also use humans for reproduction to create hybrids. The narrative includes elements like recording devices, targeted invisibility, ETs with metallic skin, abduction, mind control, and planetary surveillance.

Archives...

An article from a 1950 youth album titled "Terre des Jeunes" (October 1950) is mentioned, explaining how to build a wooden flying saucer as a craft project.

1954, la mode martienne...

A 1954 quarterly publication for youth, "Capucine," featured a cover with a character named Capucine meeting a helmeted ET and his flying saucer, suggesting a "Martian fashion" trend.

Valentin aux Fous

This section discusses an album by Tabary titled "Valentin le vagabond - Aux Fous" (1977), which pays homage to artist Robert Gigi. The album features a scene with fake humanoid figures (called "ombrecitos") who rob a village. The artist Gigi, known for his "les dossiers des SV" (UFO files) albums with Jacques Lob, is depicted investigating with Valentin and apprehending bandits who used a balloon to simulate a flying saucer takeoff. A comic strip within this section shows characters discussing UFO sightings and publications.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around UFO sightings, extraterrestrial encounters, and their representation in popular culture, including literature, film, music, and advertising. There's a consistent thread of critical analysis, as seen in Michel Granger's debunking of a photo and the discussion of a parody newspaper. The magazine also explores historical aspects of UFO phenomena, from early 1950s youth publications to science fiction novels from the late 1960s. The editorial stance appears to be one of investigation and critical examination, presenting various perspectives on unexplained phenomena while also acknowledging their presence in entertainment and media.

Title: BLACK STAR
Issue Date: October 28, 2004
Content Type: Magazine Issue

This issue of BLACK STAR delves into various aspects of ufology, featuring a mix of news, case studies, book reviews, and product advertisements.

Article: BLACK STAR - John Trochmann and the Montana Militia

The issue begins with a report from the CNEGU on October 24, 2004, transitioning to a discussion about news from France2 and US elections. The main focus shifts to MONTANA, USA, where John Trochmann, founder of the MONTANA militia, is presented. Trochmann claims that a CIA aircraft, dubbed 'the Black Star,' was responsible for telecommanding the Boeing aircraft used in the 9/11 attacks. He describes this craft as a supersonic vehicle capable of controlling airliners remotely. The article includes a tract supporting these claims and an enlarged image of the object of interest.

The text notes that for this American, the object is not a Belgian UFO but a secret aircraft. It also mentions that inhabitants of MONTANA have previously provided surprising accounts. A meeting with the BURGESS family in JORDAN, MONTANA, owners of a large ranch, revealed no knowledge of animal mutilations or UFO phenomena, though they were aware of UFOs occurring in South America.

Article: Ufologist Rafaël Farriols and the UMMO Affair

This section reports the passing of Spanish ufologist Rafaël Farriols in Barcelona on December 27, 2006. Farriols, born in 1928, was a businessman and active ufologist known for collecting documents related to the 'UMMO affair.' This affair involved hundreds of letters allegedly sent by 'strangers' to Spanish ufologists over decades. Farriols organized the first congress on this topic in 1971. In 1969, he co-authored 'Un caso perfetto' with Antonio Ribera, detailing observations and photographs from the Madrid region in 1967. A translation was published in Italy. This information is attributed to Alejandro Agostinelli and extracted from 'Italian UFO NewsFlash.'

References are made to articles about the UMMO affair in 'Les Mystères De l'Est' (1999 and 2004).

Article: Aimé Michel, Screenwriter

This segment discusses a 1972 TF1 TV series titled 'Mycènes, celui qui vient du futur,' directed by F. Chalet and written by Aimé Michel and Louis Rognoni. The fictional story involves a couple abducted and subjected to experiments by strange, three-fingered humanoids with large heads. They are aided by a robot to return to their present. The article highlights that Aimé Michel uses this narrative to explore the hypothesis of time travelers explaining UFO phenomena.

Article: ETs Love Amaranth

This piece references Karl Pflock's investigation into the Roswell crash, as detailed in the book 'Roswell l'ultime enquête' (2007). It notes a description of the crash site by Major J. Marcel as arid with 'amaranth' present. The author finds this amusing given that a significant case studied by GEPAN, and cited by French ufologists, is named after the 'amarantes' massif, related to a UFO sighting in Laxou (54) in 1983.

Article: Martiens, Marliens?

This section corrects an error from a previous issue and discusses the 'Marliens affair' in Côte d'Or, France. An article from May 11, 1967, in 'Les Dépêches' titled 'From Marliens to Martiens, only one letter needs to change...' is mentioned. The article was about the Marliens affair, and the journalist and ufologist Jean Cercoles intentionally used the wordplay. Guy Tarade, in his 1975 book 'Soucoupes Volantes et civilisations d'outre-espace,' mistakenly wrote 'Martiens' instead of 'Marliens' when referring to traces in Côte d'Or, revealing his underlying thoughts.

Product Advertisements: Flying Gadgets

  • This section features advertisements for various flying gadgets available for purchase, including:
  • Disque à Lancer HOOVER: A disc that floats and rolls, fillable with air or helium, with a self-closing valve and foldable design.
  • SOUCOUPE VOLANTE: A remote-controlled flying saucer with LED lights and a charging station.
  • OVNI SOLAIRE: A solar-powered balloon that inflates with heat and can ascend up to 50 meters.

These items are available for purchase via e-commerce at http://www.pearl.fr.

Announcements: Rémy Fauchereau's Investigations

Rémy Fauchereau, a field ufologist and member of A.E.P.A. and SCEAU/Archives OVNI, has been soliciting witness testimonies for his catalog. He has placed announcements in villages to gather recent and old UFO sighting accounts.

Publication: L'AFFAIRE DE TRANS-EN-PROVENCE

This section promotes an opuscule published in 1995 about the Trans-en-Provence landing case. It compiles documents from the counter-investigation led by the SERPAN association. The 148-page publication, featuring illustrations and press clippings, is available for 25€ from SCEAU/Archives OVNI.

Publication: Les OVNI du CNES

This review discusses the book 'Les OVNI du CNES, 30 ans d'études officielles (1977-2007),' co-edited by David Rossoni, Éric Maillot, and Éric Déguillaume. The book examines the work of the French national space agency's UFO study group (Gepan, Sepra, Geipan) over 30 years. It questions whether the official reports, which have identified thousands of UFO sightings, provide evidence for extraterrestrial origins or if conventional explanations are sufficient. The book is prefaced by Jean-Pierre Swings and postfaced by Jean Bricmont. It is available from Book-E-Book.

Publication: DOSSIER MARLIENS

This announces the availability of a 63-page special publication from C.N.E.G.U. titled 'MARLIENS' from May 1967, with an update from 1998. Orders can be placed with Christine ZWYGART in Chaumont, France.

Publication: SOUSCRIPTION - CONNAISSANCE DES MOTIFS DE L'IMAGERIE SOUCOUPIQUE DANS LES POPULATIONS RURALES DE L'EST ALGERIEN

This announces a 75-page publication by Thierry PINVIDIC, available for subscription before June 20, 2006, and distributed from July 2006. The study explores the knowledge of saucer imagery in rural populations of Eastern Algeria, examining the influence of cultural and religious contexts on the penetration of the UFO concept. It compares the Algerian and Chinese situations, suggesting that a strong religious framework acts as a barrier to the stereotype's spread.

Publication: Le SCEAU/Archives OVNI Co-edits or Distributes

This section lists and describes several publications distributed or co-edited by SCEAU/Archives OVNI:
1. APPROCHE SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIQUE DU PHENOMENE OVNI by J-M. Abrassart: A 100-page A4 work examining UFO phenomena from a socio-psychological perspective, including science fiction, altered states of consciousness, and perceptual illusions. It includes a questionnaire analysis and a postface by Pr Meessen. Price: 20€.
2. L'AFFAIRE DE TRANS-EN-PROVENCE by SERPAN: A 148-page A4 opuscule offering a new perspective on the Trans-en-Provence landing case, compiling documents from a counter-investigation. Price: 25€.
3. L'AFFAIRE D. ou: Retour sur une affaire vieille de 40 ans by Bruno Bousquet: A 124-page A4 dossier detailing a close encounter case from April 1955. Price: 20€.

Orders can be placed with SCEAU/Archives OVNI at the provided address in Brunoy, France. Payment methods include bank transfer (Belgium), postal check (France), and international postal money order (other countries).

Back Cover: Temps libre

  • The back cover features a cartoon of two aliens reading and drinking, with the text "Nous vous invitons à lire au plus tôt et de façon régulière :" followed by a list of ufological publications:
  • Ufo Log (Association Nexus)
  • Bulletin de l'association (S.P.I.C.A.)
  • Cuadernos de Ufologia (Fundacion Anomalia)
  • UFO (C.I.S.U.)
  • UFOMANIA (Planète Ovni)
  • Bulletin Trimestriel (G.E.R.U.)

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around UFO sightings, alleged secret aircraft, historical UFO cases (UMMO, Roswell, Trans-en-Provence, Marliens), and the scientific study of UFOs (CNES/Gepan). The magazine appears to present a range of perspectives, from speculative claims about CIA involvement in 9/11 to critical analyses of official UFO investigations. The editorial stance seems to be one of open inquiry into unexplained aerial phenomena, providing information on various cases, publications, and related products.