Mysteres De L'Est - No 09 - 2004

Magazine Overview

Title: LES MYSTÈRES DE L'EST
Issue: 9
Volume/Year: Année 2004
Publisher: CNEGU (Comité Nord-Est des Groupes Ufologiques)
Country: France
Language: French
ISSN: 1277-5533

This issue of "Les Mystères de l'Est" is a bulletin dedicated to ufology, published by the CNEGU. It covers a range of topics related to UFO phenomena, including research conducted by the CNEGU, UFOs in the press, historical cases, and contributions from readers. The issue also provides information about the CNEGU organization itself, its history, and its activities.

CNEGU - Ufologie

The magazine opens with an introduction to CNEGU, detailing its origins in 1978 as a coordination committee for ufological groups in northeastern France. It highlights CNEGU's primary activities, which include verifying UFO sightings through investigations and research, elaborating a rational methodology for analysis, and compiling regional observation catalogues. The organization also cooperates with other researchers and public bodies, aiming for a better understanding of the UFO phenomenon. The website http://www.cnegu.fr.st/ is mentioned, and the current members of CNEGU are listed, including Patrick Fournel, Francine Juncosa, Renaud Leclet, Eric Maillot, Gilles Munsch, Raoul Robé, Patrice Seray, Thierry Rocher, and Christine Zwygart. Past member associations are also listed, such as ADRUP, AIHPI, CIGU, CLEU, CVLDLN, GAU, GEPO, GHREPA, GPUN, GROUPE 5255, and ONA. CNEGU was also instrumental in the creation of the VECA group and contributed to SCEAU.

Contents and Articles

The table of contents reveals a comprehensive issue with numerous articles:

Les travaux du CNEGU (The Work of CNEGU)

• This section features several articles detailing CNEGU's research and findings:
• "Quand le journal Pif lançait ses gadgets UFO" by Raoul Robé discusses how the French youth magazine "PIF" (and its predecessor "VAILLANT") featured UFO-related themes and gadgets, including a 1964 article titled "La terre a-t-elle été visitée par des cosmonautes d'autres planètes?" and a 1972 comic featuring a flying saucer.
• "Les OVNIS dans la publicité : Lustucru" examines UFOs in advertising.
• "Photo Mystère N°1" and "Photo Mystère N°2" likely present and analyze photographic evidence.
• "Reflets optiques (suite)" continues a discussion on optical reflections.
• "L'affaire du cheval "affolé" - Espagne - Septembre 1968" investigates a specific case in Spain.
• "La Soucoupe Volante du CNEGU" details a CNEGU-related flying saucer case.
• "Catalogues CNEGU : Catalogue des observations de 1978" presents a catalogue of UFO observations from 1978.
• "Le monde étrange de l'Ufologie" explores the broader landscape of ufology.
• "Entités extraterrestres, apparitions fantomatiques ou gens du "petit peuple"?" discusses the nature of entities reported in sightings.
• "Lâcher de ballons (catalogue méprises)" catalogues misidentifications involving balloon launches.
• "OVNI et aviation" explores the intersection of UFOs and aviation.
• "L'affaire du B-57B. Nous l'avion pressenti" revisits the B-57B case.
• "Ummo, une trace à l'heure américaine ?" and "Hummo...r" delve into the Ummo phenomenon.

Les Ovni dans la presse (UFOs in the Press)

This section, titled "Revue de presse," compiles articles about UFOs published in various media.

Manifestations diverses (Various Events)

This section covers "CNEGU 77&78" and the "AG 2004 du SCEAU Archives OVNI," indicating reports on past CNEGU activities and a 2004 general assembly of SCEAU Archives OVNI.

La tribune de l'extérieur (The Tribune from Outside)

• This section features external perspectives and research:
• "L'histoire réelle d'une grande découverte" by Marc Hallet.
• "Rendons à César" by the editorial team.
• "Réflexions personnelles" and "Les matérialisations et dématérialisations" by Jean-Pierre Delbarre.
• "OVNI du passé : quelques mises à jour, mises au point et précisions..." by Axel Mazuer updates and clarifies past UFO cases.

Le courrier des lecteurs (Readers' Mail)

This section includes "Réflexions de G. Bonnier et réponse de P. Seray," featuring reader feedback and a response.

Le pêle-mêle (The Mélange)

• This section contains miscellaneous items:
• "Pêle-mêle" (general miscellany).
• "Photo Mystère N°1 (solution)" provides the solution to a previous photo mystery.
• "Publication du SCEAU" lists publications from SCEAU, including contributions from J-M. Abrassart, SERPAN, and B. Bousquet.
• "Publication CNEGU : Dossier Marliens" highlights a CNEGU publication.
• "Temps libre" (Free time) includes humorous pages signed by Raoul Robé (Ralrob).

Hommage

The issue includes a "HOMMAGE" section where CNEGU pays tribute to witnesses, journalists, and ufologists who, 50 years prior, contributed to the recognition of the famous "Vague d'observation de 1954" (1954 Observation Wave). The article notes the wave's significant role in ufological research in France and beyond, emphasizing the importance of preserving information from that era. It also mentions Raoul Robé's illustration as a nod to the "Soucoupes Volantes" (Flying Saucers) era.

Bédéditorial

This section features a comic strip titled "Bédéditorial" by Raoul Robé, dated April 1, 2004. The comic humorously depicts the challenges of writing an editorial, with characters discussing UFO-related topics and the CNEGU team's diverse skills.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the systematic investigation and documentation of UFO phenomena. CNEGU's commitment to rigorous research, archival work, and the dissemination of findings through its bulletin is evident. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious inquiry into unexplained aerial phenomena, while also embracing a sense of community and historical appreciation within the ufological field, as shown by the homage to the 1954 wave and the humorous "Bédéditorial."

This issue of PIF, titled "Quand le journal PIF lançait ses gadgets UFO" (When the magazine PIF launched its UFO gadgets), authored by Raoul Robé, explores the magazine's foray into UFO-themed merchandise and its impact on popular culture. The magazine was highly popular, achieving a circulation of 1 million copies between 1969 and 1972. The issue delves into how these flying gadgets, such as the 'GADGETUS X.B.15. LA SOUSOLANTE,' may have contributed to UFO misidentifications and reinforced the myth of extraterrestrial visitors.

PIF's UFO Gadgets: The OVNI SOLAIRE

The article highlights the "OVNI SOLAIRE" (Solar UFO), a special PIF gadget featured in June 1982. This was a large, 3-meter-long captive dirigible designed to rise over 3000 meters using solar energy, described as the largest gadget ever produced by PIF. The issue includes historical information on lighter-than-air craft and mentions a 'skyship' in the shape of a flying saucer. The back cover of the fascicle presented press clippings from 'Le Provençal' detailing UFO sightings and misidentifications in Marseille, possibly linked to the gadget.

Lighter-Than-Air Technology and UFOs

The magazine discusses the evolution of lighter-than-air technology, from scientific balloons used for atmospheric research after 1945 to advanced concepts like infrared montgolfières. It notes France's systematic use of balloons in the 1960s, exemplified by the 1971 Eole program involving 479 balloons and the Eole satellite. Future projects, like the Franco-Soviet Venera project to launch balloons into Venus's atmosphere, are also mentioned. The article then shifts to dirigibles, envisioning their potential for transporting heavy loads and passengers, with a 'Skyship' (sky boat) designed as a saucer-shaped airship intended for a London-Paris route by the end of 1981. This section questions whether lighter-than-air craft are making a comeback and suggests a future of hybrid designs incorporating dirigible, airplane, and helicopter elements, all driven by electronics.

UFOs in Advertising: Lustucru

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the use of UFOs and aliens in advertising, particularly the pasta brand Lustucru. The article details how advertisers draw inspiration from cinema and science fiction. It recounts Lustucru's 1984 advertising campaign featuring 'little green Martians' abducting a cook named Germaine, inspired by the comic strip "les petits hommes verts" by Pat Mallet. The campaign aimed to leverage the existing brand recognition and add humor and modernity. The article also touches upon a 1986 attempt by CNEGU to conduct a witness questionnaire sponsored by Lustucru, which failed because the public remembered the alien abduction gag more than the brand itself.

Production of the Lustucru Commercials

The magazine provides an in-depth look at the production of the Lustucru TV commercials and animations. It describes the technical challenges faced in creating the alien characters, which were ultimately realized as marionettes. The process involved designing costumes, using expanded foam and latex for the alien skin, and creating internal mechanisms with iron rods and ball joints to animate the limbs. The filming took place at studios in Aubervilliers, with scenes shot from a pit to allow puppeteers to manipulate the characters from below. Special techniques were employed for scenes inside the spaceship, including building sets elevated from the ground.

Photo Mystère N° 1

This section presents a photograph labeled "Photo Mystère N° 1" by Gilles Munsch. It features a metallic, saucer-shaped object hovering over a hilly, sparsely vegetated terrain. The photo is described as being taken in perfect weather, with the object clearly reflecting sunlight. The article poses the question of whether it captured an extraordinary extraterrestrial craft and states that the photo is not faked, leaving a hint of mystery.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the intersection of popular culture, science fiction, and commercial interests, particularly concerning UFOs and extraterrestrial themes. PIF's role in popularizing these themes through its gadgets and content is central. The magazine adopts an informative and slightly playful tone, exploring the cultural impact of UFO phenomena and their exploitation in media and advertising. The editorial stance appears to be one of fascination with the subject matter, presenting both the technological aspects and the cultural reception of UFOs and related merchandise.

This issue of 'Reflets Optiques' (suite), authored by Patrice Seray & Francine Cordier, delves into the critical analysis of photographic evidence within ufology, primarily focusing on the concept of optical reflections as explanations for alleged UFO sightings. The publication date is inferred from a reference to VSD magazine in November 2003.

Analysis of Photographic Cases

The article begins by referencing an article in 'Mystères de l'Est' (issue 4) by Eric Maillot, who presented logical arguments regarding nocturnal light representations on photographic clichés. The authors express skepticism towards the ufological community's ready acceptance of such evidence, especially when no concurrent observations exist.

St-Vallier Case

Gilles Munsch is cited for his analysis of the St-Vallier case, demonstrating that the luminous artifacts were likely flares due to their symmetrical appearance centered in the image.

Tokyo (1973) and Capitole (1952) Cases

Eric Maillot's contribution is highlighted for submitting additional cases for analysis, including the famous September 1973 clichés from Tokyo and the 'Capitole affair' from July 1952. The authors note that this latter information was not widely published by French ufological associations.

Champigny (1978) Case

A particularly detailed case involves Monsieur G., who, in June or July 1978, decided to test his recently acquired camera. While taking photos from his second-floor apartment in Champigny (94) between 11 PM and midnight, he noticed nothing unusual. However, upon development, a sharp, luminous object of extraordinary shape, resembling the 'Saturn' object photographed in 1958 near Trinidad (Brazil), appeared in the upper right corner of the clichés. Eight clichés were analyzed, and no signs of tampering or camera defects were found. The investigators confirmed the apartment window was open, and the object appeared in the same position on all negatives, verified by superposition. The authors suggest the object's luminosity and 'point' ruled out a simple reflection, but later analysis, particularly by Gilles Munsch, pointed to a reflection from a street lamp at the far left of the photo, which 'echoed' or 'irised' onto the lens center. This conclusion was presented at the 75th CNEGU session in June 2003.

Alphajet in Flight (1973) and Salem (1952) Cases

The article presents a postcard depicting an Alphajet in flight (first flight October 26, 1973), which appears to show a squadron of 'flying saucers'. This is compared to a cliché from Salem, taken in July 1952, during a period of widespread UFO sightings in the US. The authors propose that these 'saucers' are reflections from the car bodies, with fog contributing to the luminous sources in the sky. Document 2, a complete view of the Salem photograph, suggests the road is facing the lights, and even neon lights in the room could be a factor. The similarity between the two photographs is described as extraordinary, leading to the conclusion that if the army had allowed such a document to circulate, it would imply a significant cover-up.

Further analysis of the Alphajet photograph reveals a doubling of the lower 'objects', indicating a reflection of the cockpit onto the camera lens. The curved glass of the cockpit or windows is identified as a potential source of optical illusions.

General Principles of Photographic Analysis

The authors advocate for a logical, rational, and functional exegesis of photographic evidence. They stress that if no direct testimony corroborates a cliché showing mysterious lights, the origin is likely elsewhere, with reflections being a frequent cause. They urge extreme caution with photographic documents, especially when unaccompanied by testimony.

Urca Cove (Brazil) Case (1970)

Two photographs taken in 1970 by M.E. Stukert in Urca Cove, Brazil, show curious luminous bars that appeared after development. While initially appearing spectacular, closer examination reveals the origin of these bars to be from the nearby city lights. The authors note the similarity to city lights and suggest that the photographer, by slightly shifting his position, created a seemingly puzzling effect.

VSD Magazine and the 'Oklahoma Sphere'

A 'petite note intermédiaire' discusses a special OVNI issue of 'VSD' magazine, which featured a series of photographs allegedly showing a blue sphere rapidly ascending into a vortex. Eric Maillot's commentary is quoted, suggesting the photographer only captured a small blue ball, not visible in the VSD photos, and that the 'sphere' was actually a reflection in the lens, a known phenomenon for photographers. The article questions if this was a prank or an attempt to create sensationalism, noting VSD's lack of verification.

Tokyo Clichés Confirmation

A 'heureuse confirmation' is presented regarding the Tokyo clichés, reiterating that a street lamp reflection is responsible for the 'materialization' of an object. A third cliché is offered as further evidence, suggesting the ufological community is 'blind' to such obvious explanations. The article references 'L'Autre Monde' HS N°1 for this cliché.

'Cheval Affolé' Affair (Spain, 1968)

This section, authored by Francine Juncosa & Patrice Seray, revisits the 'Affair of the 'Mad Horse'' from Spain in September 1968. M. André Bernier, on a trip to Costa Brava, took a photo of a horse rearing. Upon development, the slide showed a yellowish tint with luminous traces, interpreted by some as an 'escadrille of saucers'. The analysis by SOBEPS and LAET, including Gaston Delcorps and Bernard Bazzani, found no evidence of tampering and ruled out reflections from windows. They considered a possible reflection from a source above and close to the horse. The authors of 'Reflets Optiques' propose that a simple enlargement of the lower right corner of the slide reveals the origin of the lights. They trace optical axes and note that strong luminosities in the lower right, inscribed on the slide, are reflected on the glass, not on the clouds as the witness noted. The article suggests these lights could be from lamps used to illuminate a scene or maquette.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout the issue is the critical examination of photographic evidence in ufology. The authors consistently argue that many purported UFO sightings captured on film are explainable as optical phenomena, particularly reflections from artificial light sources such as street lamps, car headlights, or even internal lighting. They advocate for a rigorous, logical, and evidence-based approach, urging caution against premature acceptance of sensational claims. The editorial stance is one of skepticism towards unsubstantiated photographic evidence and a promotion of rational explanations, emphasizing that the 'ufological community' may be prone to seeing what it wants to see, sometimes overlooking simple explanations.

References

The article includes a list of references, citing 'Les Mystères de l'Est' (issues 3 and 4), 'Inforespace', 'Le livre noir des soucoupes volantes' by Henry DURRANT, 'L'Autre Monde' HS N°1, and VSD magazine (November 2003).

This issue of Inforespace, identified as Issue 6 of its 1st year, published in 1972, with a cover date of 1972, is a French-language magazine focusing on ufology. The cover headline, "Vous voulez plus de détails ? Voilà :" (You want more details? Here they are:), introduces a detailed analysis of a photograph, suggesting it is a case of reflections rather than a genuine UFO.

Analysis of a Photographic Case

The first article, by Francine CORDIER and Patrice SERAY, critically examines a photograph, suggesting that the luminous sources recorded were likely reflections on a window, possibly from a light bulb that the witness did not notice. The authors argue that the simplest explanation should be favored, and that the visual correlation of the "phenomenon" is absent. They propose that light sources to the right of the cliché, particularly those on the far right and lower down, are responsible for the result. The article concludes that this case, while spectacular, does not contribute to ufology and is likely a case of involuntary reflections. The authors reference information from "New 0087" (Inforespace n° 6 – 1972), MDE n° 9 (upcoming), and the book "A identifier et le cas Adamski" by J.G. Dohmen.

A Bit of Belgian Ufological History...

Marc Hallet provides a historical overview of ufology in Belgium, starting with the late 1960s when only a few small ufological groups existed. He recounts a significant event in November 1968 when a large-scale luminous phenomenon was observed across Belgium and by thousands in England, initially thought to be an "escadrille of saucers" or "planes with lights on." This phenomenon was later identified by specialists as debris from a Cosmos satellite. The article then focuses on the emergence of the SOBEPS (Société Belge d'Étude des Phénomènes Spatiaux) in the early 1970s.

Hallet details a specific event in July 1972 where three large "lights" passed over Belgium, described as a triangle formation. SOBEPS launched an appeal for witnesses and gathered numerous accounts. Lucien Clerebaut, the founder of SOBEPS, gave an interview discussing a testimony where an object reportedly changed color and altitude to evade an aircraft. Clerebaut asserted that UFOs undoubtedly existed and that SOBEPS comprised 48 collaborators, many of them scientists. He mentioned an ambitious project to build a database of one hundred thousand controlled UFO observations and promised detailed statistical studies within two years.

SOBEPS also initiated a photographic observation network of the sky, with members aiming their cameras at pre-arranged times for half-hour intervals to capture potential UFOs. This program was planned to last four years. Another project involved deploying detectors to measure magnetic field variations that could confirm UFO passages recorded by the photographic network.

In mid-July, after press articles about the UFO sightings, SOBEPS concluded that the phenomenon was real but not attributable to known flying craft or usual phenomena. They did not rule out the hypothesis of an unidentified flying object of extraterrestrial origin. The article notes that SOBEPS provided a list of collaborators that did not match Clerebaut's previous claims of numerous scientists. SOBEPS also announced its collaboration with LAET (Laboratoire d'Analyse et d'Expérimentation Technique) of Liège for chemical and physical laboratory research and photographic expertise.

Reflecting on these events years later, Hallet questions the fate of these ambitious projects, the results of the photographic and magnetic networks, and the existence of the claimed database. He also probes the identity of the scientists Clerebaut mentioned and the true nature and accomplishments of LAET.

Hallet reveals that LAET was a simple association of individuals, initially composed of three chemists from the University of Liège. Two of them were interested in UFOs, while the third focused on the Templars. These two, claiming to lead the "UFO department" of LAET, purported to conduct physical and chemical "expertises" using university equipment. Only one of them was an amateur photographer.

LAET produced only one photographic expertise for SOBEPS, concerning a photo taken in Spain of luminous objects frightening a horse. This photo, which had appeared on the cover of Jean-Gérard Dohmen's book, was deemed authentic by LAET after supposedly complex studies. However, Hallet states it was a crude hoax discovered years later by a group member, with no rectification published for fear of ridicule. LAET's existence was short-lived, as its main protagonist became involved with the Rosicrucian sect AMORC, abandoning UFO interests, leading to LAET's demise.

The article is sourced from press clippings and personal contacts with LAET founders, dated Liège, March 22, 2004.

The CNEGU Saucer...

This section, by Raoul Robé, features photographs of what is described as "La Soucoupe Volante du CNEGU..." (The CNEGU Saucer...). The images show a green, saucer-shaped object, possibly a fairground ride element, with cartoonish green figures interacting with it. A caption reads "Bon sang ! Le CNEGU a mis la main sur notre soucoupe !" (Good heavens! CNEGU got its hands on our saucer!).

C.N.E.G.U. Catalogues: Explanation of Observation Work

This section outlines the objectives and methodology of the C.N.E.G.U. (Centre National d'Étude des Phénomènes Spatiaux) in cataloging UFO observations. The goal is to update observation cases and create standardized files based on their methodology, using the 1978 catalogue as an example. They request information to complete their investigation files and offer their own information to others.

• The methodology involves criteria for sorting and action, including:
• A (A délaisser): To set aside (cases deemed uninteresting or undocumented).
• B (A documenter): To document (cases needing further investigation).
• C (A informer): To inform (cases needing completion, with unfinished or superficial work).
• D (A mettre en forme): To format (cases ready for reporting, complete investigation).
• E (A archiver): To archive (complete and formatted cases).
• F (A signaler): To signal (annex cases, e.g., Marian apparitions).

A codification system is explained, breaking down cases by country, investigation group, department, date (year, month, day), and observation number. Missing elements are coded as "00". A list of codes for groups and individuals is provided, including SOBEPS (84) and Jean-Michel LIGERON (89), among others.

Catalogue C.N.E.G.U. of Observations 1978

This section presents a detailed catalogue of UFO observations from 1978, updated in March 2004. It is divided into two parts (Page 1/2 and Page 2/2) and lists cases under different categories: A (A délaisser - To set aside), B (A documenter - To document), C (A informer - To inform), D (A mettre en forme - To format), E (A archiver - To archive), and F (A signaler - To signal). Each entry includes a reference code (e.g., F/99/52 78 01 10 (01)) and a date.

January 1978 Observations

Several specific cases from January 1978 are detailed:

• F/87/57780100 (01): At Troisfontaines, Mme Chevrier saw a strange object with green and red lights. An eyewitness in Sarrebourg also saw it. M. Masson, near Guebling, reported three very bright white lights, one of which followed him for 2 km, emitting a beam. Sources: LDLN n° 173, L'Est républicain.
• F/87/57780107 (01): On January 7th, M. Masson observed three white lights in a field near Vergaville to Guebling. One light rose and hovered above him. Despite investigations by the Gendarmerie, no trace was found. Sources: LDLN n° 173, n° 176, Gepan, Le Républicain Lorrain.
• F/99/52780110 (01): On January 10th, between 18:30 and 19:00, a witness in Chamouilley observed an orange, banana-shaped object moving horizontally, undergoing transformations, and then accelerating rapidly and disappearing. Source: Groupe 52-55.
• F/87/21780111 (01): In Dijon at 18:00 on January 11th, M. F. Tournebize observed a luminous object in the Northwest for 10 minutes before it vanished. Source: LDLN n° 173, Le Bien Public.
• F/15/57780115 (01): On the evening of January 15th, an automobilist in Troisfontaines saw a strange object with green and red lights. Source: L'Est Républicain.
• F/15/57780115 (01) (repeated entry): On the evening of January 15th, Alain Masson in Guebling observed three bright white UFOs, one of which followed him for nearly two kilometers, illuminating him with a beam. Source: L'Est Républicain.
• F/88/57780116 (01): Mr. M. accompanied the author to various observation points. In Hobling, they observed a powerful yellow-red light appear, followed by two yellow-red projectors near the ground. An object descended in a spiral and landed silently on a hill. Weather: overcast, light fog. Sources: Trait d'Union, Magonia, Banque Ovni.
• F/99/55780117 (01): On January 17th, two brothers testing walkie-talkies near Ancerville-Güe observed a large, static orange light with rays at 23:30. The object appeared as a perfect sphere without a halo. The next day, a helicopter from BA 113 Saint-Dizier was observed searching the area. Later that week, a closed ring-shaped trace, approximately 10 meters in diameter, was discovered. Tests showed that grass within and around the trace grew more abundantly and was a darker green. Source: Groupe 52-55.
• F/89/08780125 (01): At 19:30, seven young people in Nouzonville observed a saucer-shaped craft moving slowly at low altitude from South to North, with red lights at the base and flashing white lights above. Source: OVNI en Ardennes, L'Ardennais.

February 1978 Observations

Several cases from February 1978 are also detailed:

• F/98/88780200 (01): In February or March 1978, Mme S. in Barville observed an orange luminous reflection on her window, appearing as a large, thick oval platform that moved up and down. The explanation given is a reflection on low clouds of a fire in a nearby quarry. Cross-references to other cases involving the same witness are provided.
• F/87/68780214 (01): Around 19:00 in Mulhouse, M. Rupp saw a flat object with two headlights and a triangle in the middle, about 5 meters above a house. The headlights alternated. The object disappeared behind the roof. The witness had a similar observation three years prior. Source: LDLN n° 147, L'Alsace.
• F/88/21780215 (01): A red, elongated, cigar-shaped light was observed by numerous witnesses in Burgundy, including Dijon and Saône-et-Loire. It had sharp contours and moved rapidly. Witnesses described it as not being an atmospheric phenomenon or an aircraft. A similar sighting of a "Michelin tire" sized cigar moving at high speed was reported by a resident of Corcelles-les-Monts. Source: Banque Ovni, Le Bien Public.
• F/99/55780218 (01): On February 18th, in Rupt-aux-Nonains, a woman observed a static object low on the horizon, initially mistaken for the moon. It was crescent-shaped with pointed horns, a convex part to the left, and a spherical middle. It was luminous yellow. When she looked again, the object had disappeared. The sky was overcast, and the moon had set. Source: Groupe 52-55.
• F/06/51780221 (01): On February 21st, near Reims, seven people, including a mayor and his daughter, observed a fast-moving white light, like a neon tube ending in a spindle. It was seen in three different locations, had a green halo, and moved from East to West. Source: Not specified.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue consistently explores the critical analysis of UFO evidence, particularly photographic and testimonial. The editorial stance, as exemplified by the analysis of the cover photo and the debunking of the LAET's photographic expertise, leans towards skepticism and the search for conventional explanations for reported phenomena. There is a strong emphasis on historical documentation and cataloging of cases, as seen with the C.N.E.G.U. catalogue. The magazine also delves into the history of ufological organizations in Belgium, highlighting their efforts, ambitions, and eventual challenges. The recurring theme is the rigorous investigation of UFO reports, often concluding that many sightings can be attributed to misidentifications, natural phenomena, or hoaxes, while acknowledging the persistent mystery surrounding some unexplained cases.

This document, titled "OVNI 1978 - L'Année des Phénomènes Lumineux," is a compilation of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and UFO sightings reported in France throughout the year 1978. It functions as a chronological catalog, detailing individual incidents with reference numbers, dates, locations, witness accounts, and sometimes proposed explanations or sources.

March 1978

• Bourtzwiller, Mulhouse: On an unspecified date, around 19:45, four inhabitants observed a large orange ball rotating above a cemetery before disappearing towards Illzach. The observation lasted approximately 5 minutes.
• Chatenois: In March, likely a Wednesday, around 20:40, Mr. N.V. observed a bright, colorful bolide following a curvilinear trajectory, explained as a meteor.
• Tétherchen: On Monday, March 6th, around 07:05, Mme Hecfingen noticed a strange, immobile object above a high-tension pylon. Her son, using binoculars, described it as an aluminum-colored rectangle with fixed red-orange triangles at each end. A second, similar object was seen above a wood. Both remained stationary until 07:40, then slowly ascended and moved towards Tromborn. A strange, geometrically undefined burn mark was found on the grass at the base of the pylon, with the grass being unusually short and yellowish-white.
• Rainville: On Tuesday, around 19:30, Mlle Béatrice de Belly observed a luminous object between Saint-Paul and Dommartin, appearing as a large mass formed by two luminescent white balls joined by a bright red bar. The object disappeared suddenly, but other drivers on the road also witnessed it.
• Rainville: On Tuesday, around 19:15, Mr. Daniel Maine and Mr. Serge Tête observed two white, round masses connected by a light, with an orange spotlight, below the clouds (300-400 meters altitude). They remained immobile and silent, with no change in form during the observation.

April 1978

• Nancy: In April or May, around 21:30, two people observed a fast-moving, vertical green and red conical object with a pointed end passing over the Pépinière park.
• Vandoeuvre: On Saturday, April 1st, around 20:20, a couple observed a long, cigar-shaped object with diffuse contours, moving obliquely high in the sky, which gradually faded. Two photos were taken, but no phenomenon appeared on the prints.
• Woevre region: On Sunday, April 2nd, around 23:35, an automobilist observed two milky white luminous "balls" following his vehicle at a height of 1.70-2 meters. They disappeared instantly without noise when another car approached.
• Epinal (ZAC): Around 20:30, Mme M. observed a cigar-shaped object, orange with a yellow halo, moving from East to West for about four seconds.
• Saint-Dié: On Friday evening, an object was observed at high altitude, appearing to have two distinct parts and shining strangely. It moved slowly SE-NO and disappeared behind La Madeleine around 21:15. The observation lasted about an hour.

May 1978

• Saint-Dié: At dusk, an observation was made of an object moving SE/NO, possibly a misidentification of an astronautical event.
• Saint Laurent: Around 06:00, a witness observed an immobile luminous phenomenon near a high-tension pylon for about 30 seconds. It disappeared instantly in the direction of the Meuse valley.
• Barville: On April 25th, around 22:05, Mlle S. de M. observed a red-orange luminous ball on the horizon, described as "launching rays," moving SE to NW. A second, similar object appeared, connected like a dumbbell. The observation lasted one to two minutes and was surrounded by a green, red, and orange halo. The witness wore glasses, and an optical effect was considered a possibility.
• Genlis: Between 08:00 and 09:00, two people observed a round, red object of indeterminate size.
• Region of Metz: On the night of May 1st-2nd, around 02:20, Mr. Schweicher noticed a whistling sound. Upon investigation, he observed an abnormal white light illuminating his street, similar to moonlight but unusual given the cloudy, rainy weather and the absence of a full moon. The whistling intensified, followed by a flash of light and total silence.
• Bettancourt-la-Ferrée: On Saturday, June 3rd, around 23:40, three young people witnessed a white luminous ball descend rapidly, slow down, perform a horizontal trajectory, draw three circles at different levels, ascend, and disappear into the clouds. It reappeared, descended, performed a perfect curve, and ascended again, disappearing definitively. The total observation lasted 15 minutes. With binoculars, the object appeared ovoid.
• Tichey-Saint-Loup: At 21:00, a white luminous object shaped like a hat was observed for ten minutes. Photos were taken.
• St-Prex-sur-Luxeuil: On Saturday, June 24th, the crew of a Boeing 707 observed a jellyfish-shaped object at 12,300 meters altitude, estimated at 14,000 meters. No radar detection was made. The explanation suggested was a possible weather balloon.
• Dijon: On Saturday, June 24th, around 11:50, Mr. G.C. observed a white, bean-shaped phenomenon, described as "rainbow-like" with binoculars. It moved like clouds towards Châtelneuf.
• Vernois-sur-Mance: On Saturday, June 24th, between 11:00 and 12:00, Mme Y.C. observed an apparatus resembling a white Concorde flying at low speed towards Bourbonne-les-Bains.
• Vernois-sur-Mance: On Saturday, June 24th, between 11:30 and 12:00, Mr. G.P. observed an apparatus resembling a white Concorde flying at low speed towards Bourbonne-les-Bains.
• Besançon: On Saturday, June 24th, around 11:30, Mlle L. observed a luminous phenomenon previously reported.
• Morteaux: On Saturday, June 24th, in the morning, Madame G. observed an immobile white rectangular object, horizontal (3 times wider than high), which disappeared behind clouds.

July 1978

• Dôle: At an unspecified time, Mr. and Mrs. X and their daughter observed a glow from the exit of Dôle to the entrance of Longvic.
• Arnancourt: On July 14th, around 03:00, four friends saw a light moving towards them. It was a luminous white spherical object following an S-shaped trajectory, appearing in the South and disappearing in the North. It changed course eastward at a 25° angle.
• Nancy region: On the night of July 12th-13th, around 00:00-00:30, Mr. Pascal L. observed two enormous, triangular objects, matte metal colored like tin, with an opaque white circle in the center. They flew silently, hovered, then one moved at extreme speed. The two objects then disappeared behind the forest.
• Strasbourg: On Sunday, July 16th or 23rd, around 22:30, several people, including two CFRU members, observed a yellow triangular object with a black dot in the center. It remained stationary at 2000 meters altitude for half an hour before moving in zigzags.
• Faix-aux-Forges: On Monday or Tuesday, July 17th or 18th, around 21:40, three farmers observed a dazzling orange cigar-shaped object with bluish nuances, moving silently at low altitude from South to East.
• Bierre-les-Semur: An student reported seeing an object at 04:00 and photographed it. The explanation given was the Moon.
• Novy-Chevrières: On July 25th, around 20:30, Mr. Maxime Dervin and his son-in-law observed a large, low-lying yellow star-like object that remained immobile for ten minutes. It was not a normal star and persisted even when a helicopter, possibly from Etain, headed towards Reims, flew below it.
• Novy-Chevrieres: Around 21:00, Mr. S.D. observed a small white ball that seemed to change position. The object changed colors from pink to pale yellow and then moved away. Later, he noticed a red ball the size of a ping-pong ball, 15 cm above a high-tension line, changing from red to green.
• Talan, Dijon, Longvic, Saint-Appolinaire, Varois: On July 27th, around 21:20, eight observations were made by numerous witnesses, describing a cigar-shaped object, or an orange luminous glow, or a triangle. The object was visible for 10 minutes.
• Asfelds: Around 22:00, M. de Longchamp saw a very bright white light, surrounded by an orange-red color, appearing immobile on the road axis.
• Montigny-le-Roi: On Friday, July 28th, around 04:00, a witness was alerted by his dog's whimpering and observed three large, luminous yellow-orange balls in the sky, appearing the size of the full moon. They moved slowly horizontally, spaced about a meter apart, with clear contours. They passed close to the house, moving NE-SO, gradually diminishing in size and disappearing without noise.

August 1978

• Dijon: Around 23:00, a young woman saw two luminous triangles moving rapidly in zigzags towards the Ouche fountain. The observation lasted about 6 seconds.
• Dijon: The previous evening, around 21:30, an elongated object with a yellow-orange light flew over Dijon, observed by multiple witnesses until 22:45.
• Détain: Around 22:30, three inhabitants observed a luminous disk, whose intensity increased for 2-3 minutes before disappearing, leaving a red trail.
• Pongivart: Around 22:17, M. de Longchamp observed a light on the road axis. It reappeared, remained visible for three seconds, disappeared, and reappeared again. The light was very bright, encircled in red/orange, and did not move.
• Longvic: Around 21:45, M. Lacandemine observed a brilliant ball in the sky for 20 minutes. It remained stationary, turned red, and moved in arabesques before disappearing. He made the same observation the next day.
• Saulcy: Around 21:00, Mr. X observed a fireball, described as nut-sized, descending and multicolored, following the passage of an airplane. This occurred for four consecutive evenings in the presence of gendarmes.
• Tomblaine: On two occasions, around 22:30, a resident observed silent UAPs: first one very large object, then two red and light green objects emitting flashes. The witness estimated their distance and altitude over the Essey landing field. The GPUN suggested it might be a maneuvering helicopter.

September 1978

• Dijon: The week before September 17th, a patrol observed a luminous phenomenon for several minutes.
• Mulhouse: On Tuesday, September 5th, witnesses observed luminous balls coming from the North, flying silently at low altitude and then ascending rapidly. The three objects appeared as flat plates topped with a hemisphere, with a diameter estimated at 25 meters.
• Dijon: Around 01:30, Mr. Malladieu observed a very bright luminous object, as large as the moon, circling and emitting a whistling sound for 20 minutes. Another witness also observed it for 5 minutes.
• Epinal region: On Sunday, around 18:30, a family observed a bizarre, brilliant, red-colored engine-shaped object moving towards a television relay. It made no noise or smoke and was at least 100 meters long. It was questioned whether this was one of 16 UFOs that crossed the sky, as three mysterious objects were reported in Saint-Laurent at the same time. Witnesses stated they were not airplanes.
• Dijon: Around 21:55, Mme X, her husband, and daughter observed an elongated shape emitting a strong white, slightly orange light. It seemed immobile, then projected a beam of light onto the mountain.
• Dijon: Around 23:10, Mr. Monot observed two scintillating luminous balls moving in jumps. They were yellow, blue, and red, visible for about 7 to 9 seconds.
• Brottes: On Tuesday, September 12th, around 01:30, a witness observed a luminous object hovering above Brottes. It was yellow with a green streak and remained suspended for nearly 20 minutes before disappearing, leaving yellow trails.
• Epinal region: Mme Golczewski Sylviane reported observing a bright blue, ovoid object with a red trail, emitting "sparks" of vivid red. It moved rapidly and disappeared over a roof. She did not see it arrive.
• Laxou and Belfort: On Wednesday, September 13th, around 22:40, a woman observed a luminous rocket-like object in the sky that disintegrated, leaving a trail of red points. An inhabitant of Laxou confirmed seeing a fast-moving shooting star disintegrating.
• Saint-Dizier: On Wednesday, September 13th, around midnight, a resident observed a stationary, bright orange luminous ball in the starry sky. It ascended vertically, hovered for 4-5 seconds, then moved horizontally and disappeared after 10 seconds. The object was perfectly spherical.
• Dijon: Around 00:00, a witness saw an orange ball that changed direction. Two planes appeared to be heading in the same direction as the ball.
• Uchey: Shortly after midnight, an object reportedly landed in a meadow. A sound resembling a blowtorch was heard, but the object was not seen.
• Epinal (ZAC): Mme M. observed a "star" moving from North to South, becoming brighter as it approached. It stopped abruptly, and another "star" appeared, moving towards the first. The second "star" stopped near the first, then departed in the direction it came from.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes throughout this compilation are the frequent sightings of luminous aerial objects, often described as balls, cigars, or geometric shapes, exhibiting unusual flight characteristics such as silence, rapid acceleration, hovering, and sudden disappearances. The reports highlight a wide geographical distribution across France and a variety of witness types, including ordinary citizens, professionals, and even military personnel (Boeing 707 crew). Explanations offered range from natural phenomena (meteors, planets, balloons) to potential misidentifications, but a significant number of cases remain unexplained, suggesting the possibility of unidentified aerial phenomena. The editorial stance appears to be one of diligent cataloging and reporting of these events, presenting the raw data from various sources without strong bias towards any single explanation, while acknowledging the need for further investigation and analysis.

This issue of OVNI magazine, dated October 1978, details numerous reports of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) observed in France during September, October, and November of that year. The publication serves as a catalog of these sightings, providing reference numbers, dates, locations, witness descriptions, and sources for each event.

September 1978 Sightings

The magazine begins with a report from September 15th, where a retired military man observed two red-orange luminous points that behaved unusually, stopping, descending, and then accelerating rapidly. On September 16th, a witness in Cousances-les-Forges saw a luminous orange ball perform a 90-degree turn and disappear after a series of zigzags. September 19th saw multiple reports from Dijon, including a silent white object described as 4-5 meters long and 30 meters wide, two luminous points emitting white light, and a witness hearing a noise and seeing a fireball. On September 23rd, a gendarme and his wife in Poinson-les-Nogent observed a bright, stationary object that projected a beam of light. Also on the 23rd, eight witnesses in Pommard reported three luminous objects, possibly communicating with light signals. September 24th featured sightings in Gérardmer and Vecoux, describing deformed, elongated, and silver objects moving at high speeds.

October 1978 Sightings

October brought a variety of sightings. On October 2nd, a vélomoteur rider in Beaumont-en-Argonne encountered an orange, green-circled flying object. The 6th of October saw a slow-moving orange object observed near rooftops in one report, and in another, four friends witnessed three unusual phenomena, including round and cigar-shaped objects. A luminous ball changing color was seen in Santenay on October 7th. The 10th of October had multiple reports: orange and red lights seen over Cirey-sur-Vezouze, a brilliant orange ball in Maxéville, and two large luminous points in Vagney and Baccara. On October 11th, a couple in Ancerville-Güe observed a silent, orange luminous object that made a sharp turn and disappeared. A detailed account from October 12th describes an oval object with a green halo and red lights, visible for an hour. On the same date, another report from Ancerville-Güe detailed a red-orange point that moved horizontally, then formed a double condensation trail, followed by a cigar-shaped object that 'exploded' silently. Also on the 12th, a white figure was seen moving rapidly and disappearing in Bouxières-aux-Dames. A witness in Thil observed an object described as more brilliant than a star, with a violet hue, and another witness confirmed an immobile object at 5,000 feet. On October 15th, two vertical white forms were seen emerging from a wood in Bouxières-aux-Dames and fleeing rapidly. On October 17th, the same witnesses from Bouxières-aux-Dames observed a white form fleeing at high speed. On October 27th, three people at Lac du Der observed a bright white point that resolved into a dark, cigar-shaped object with luminous white sections. On October 28th, a helicopter pilot observed a static, incandescent white disc near Verdun. Finally, on October 29th, a couple and their son saw two powerful orange lights approaching them in Saint-Mihiel.

November 1978 Sightings

November sightings included three luminous points moving in an oval circuit near Thaon-les-Vosges on November 2nd. On November 10th, a stationary yellow-gold ball was observed in Saint-Dizier. A truck driver in Rambervillers reported a large, dark red-pink object with a complex shape on November 10th. On November 17th, three red balls were seen moving horizontally near Thaon-les-Vosges. On November 18th, a witness in Bouxières-aux-Dames observed two white vertical forms moving rapidly. On November 22nd, three people at Lac du Der observed a bright white point that became a dark, cigar-shaped object. On November 28th, a helicopter pilot observed a static white disc near Verdun. On November 29th, a couple and their son saw two powerful orange lights approaching them.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the variety of UAP shapes, colors, and behaviors reported by numerous witnesses across France. The magazine appears to adopt a neutral stance, presenting the reported incidents with their sources and reference numbers, allowing readers to draw their own conclusions. The editorial focus is on documenting these unexplained aerial events, contributing to the study of UAP phenomena. The detailed nature of the reports, including specific times, locations, and witness accounts, suggests a commitment to thorough archival of UAP data.

This issue of "Le monde étrange de l'ufologie" (The Strange World of Ufology), dated March 2004, is authored by Patrice Seray. It delves into various UFO sightings and related phenomena, primarily focusing on reports from France during November and December 1978, alongside an analysis of a photographic case from 1974 and another from 1979.

Case Files: November and December 1978

The magazine meticulously documents numerous UFO sightings, providing reference numbers (e.g., F/87/57781107) and details from witness testimonies and investigations. These reports cover a wide geographical area within France and describe a variety of aerial phenomena.

November 1978 Sightings:

• Early November: A witness in an unspecified location observes three 'balls' arranged in a triangle that disappear without a trace. The apparent diameter is estimated at 1.5 degrees.
• Troisfontaines: Mme Chevrier reports seeing an object with green and red lights, corroborated by a schoolboy. Near Guebling, A. Masson sees three bright white objects. A Strasbourg witness also reports a bizarre aerial sighting.
• Darois-Pasques: Mr. X. encounters a luminous ball that approaches him after he flashes his headlights. The object is described as approximately ten meters in diameter, with a bright belt and a dome.
• Savigny: A witness claims to have seen an object with humanoids inside. This was later identified as a military maneuver.
• November 16th, Bainville-sur-Madon: A retired man observes an orange-glowing object in a field, shaped like a half-oval with a transparent dome. It ascends slowly, makes a right-angle turn, and vanishes eastward. Its length is estimated at 5 meters.
• November 21st, Nantes to Nogent-en-Bassigny: An ex-Air Force pilot and his family witness two large, bright blue saucers with orange domes and yellowish windows. They are estimated to be 60 meters in diameter and 15-20 meters high. The objects pass overhead at less than 100 meters altitude, causing the car's engine to stall and headlights to dim.
• November 23rd, Pont-à-Mousson: A mother sees three enormous orange-red headlights from a strange craft over a field, accompanied by a deafening noise. The object is described as a 10-meter diameter domed disc with a green hue.
• November 29th, Nancy: Multiple witnesses report an orange, elliptical luminous phenomenon moving regularly across the sky.

December 1978 Sightings:

• Early December, Nancy: Mme L., a hospital agent, observes a bright object resembling a 'motorcycle headlight' that moves erratically near rooftops.
• Early December, Mahon: Mme L. sees a yellow light, identified as the same object from the previous sighting, which disappears when her husband emerges.
• Cornimont: Four witnesses observe a bright yellow luminous form moving horizontally, projecting a cone-shaped beam.
• December 2nd, Epinal region: A luminous object ascends vertically and disappears. The observation lasted 30 seconds without noise or secondary effects.
• December 2nd, Rupt-sur-Moselle: Mme Laheurte sees a luminous cylindrical object ascending, projecting four light rays. It disappears after about thirty seconds.
• December 2nd, Epinal region: Three witnesses observe a red-orange UFO moving towards the northeast, projecting a V-shaped beam. It disappears behind a power plant chimney.
• December 2nd, Epinal: Two luminous beams are observed for 15 seconds before extinguishing, with a luminous trail persisting westward.
• December 2nd, Epinal: Two witnesses observe a white 'half-sphere' descending, followed by an explosion without sound.
• Contrexéville region: Mr. Guy Lescoffier observes a bright trail, then a powerful headlight-like light with sparks, which disappears in an explosion.
• Vittel region: Mr. Thibaut observes a luminous form, then a descending and spiraling trail that persists until 18:30. A gendarmerie report was filed.
• Bulgnéville: Mr. Baguet and others see two semicircles and a multicolored trail, followed by a bright flash and disappearance, with persistent luminosity for an hour.
• December 2nd, Epinal region: A pilot observes a rocket explosion followed by a parachute and a luminous trail.
• December 2nd, Epinal-Rambervillers: Mr. Jean-Paul G. and his team witness an orange, egg-shaped luminous object projecting a yellow beam. It moves rapidly, stabilizes briefly, and then disappears. The observation lasted 20-30 seconds.
• Besançon: Multiple witnesses in the Franche-Comté region observe an unidentified luminous object moving rapidly southwest. It was also seen near Basel, Switzerland. Swiss observers alerted the Dijon meteorological center. The object was described as a fireball with two ground-projecting beams, leaving persistent traces for three-quarters of an hour. Photos were taken by aeronauts.
• Chatillon-sur-Seine: Three people see a white ball-shaped UFO moving rapidly. The sighting coincides with a military rocket launch.

December 1978 - Official Explanations and Further Cases:

• Note on December 2nd: The GEPAN's official explanation for the phenomenon observed on December 2nd mentions a rocket launched from the Landes Test Center (Biscarosse) that went astray and was destroyed at 10,000 meters altitude.
• December 10th, Ancerville-Güe: A witness observes a luminous orange ball moving erratically and silently towards the woods of Marnaval.
• December 12th, Vertus (near Châlons-sur-Marne): The Bemelmans family observes a luminous orange ball for about fifteen minutes, described as about 1 meter in diameter, surrounded by a blue halo. It oscillated like a helicopter. The object illuminated itself as a car passed and then moved south.
• December 12th, Contrexéville-Auzainvilliers: Two witnesses observe an intense, ill-defined luminous phenomenon with a 'spongy' aspect, resembling a 'golf ball' through binoculars.

Analysis of Photographic Cases

The Paris 1974 Photograph:

An investigator describes a case from Paris in August 1974 where a witness saw a disguised object. However, upon examining the photograph, the investigator concludes that the anomaly was likely a smudge on the camera lens, not a UFO.

The Brignoles 1979 Photograph:

Patrice Seray analyzes a photograph taken by Mr. X. in November 1979 near Brignoles. Mr. X., a sign painter, took several Polaroid photos of his work. During the second shot, a flash of light occurred, and the resulting photo showed a luminous spot. Initially believed to be a UFO, further investigation revealed that the flash was caused by a streetlight that suddenly turned on. This illumination created a reflection on the camera lens, producing the 'UFO' image. The article emphasizes that the Polaroid camera did not use a flash, ruling out ambiguity regarding the reflection's origin. The author suggests that such cases highlight how easily witnesses can be convinced of UFOs, especially when supported by 'ufologists'.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine presents a detailed catalog of UFO sightings, emphasizing witness testimony and providing specific dates, locations, and descriptions. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical investigation, as demonstrated by the analysis of the Paris and Brignoles photographs, which attribute the phenomena to natural explanations or equipment anomalies rather than extraterrestrial craft. The publication also includes a codification system for its case files and notes on official explanations provided by organizations like GEPAN, suggesting a commitment to rigorous documentation and analysis within the field of ufology.

This issue of 'Les Mystères de l'Est' (likely a publication from CNEGU) delves into paranormal phenomena, UFO sightings, and critiques of aviation-related literature. The cover headline poses the question: 'Extraterrestrial Entities, ghostly apparitions or people of the "little people"?' The issue features articles by Raoul Robé and Renaud Leclet, with contributions and mentions of various individuals involved in ufology, journalism, and aviation.

Article 1: Entités Extraterrestres, apparitions fantômatiques ou gens du "petit peuple" ? by Raoul Robé

Raoul Robé recounts his investigation into a case involving a witness named Magalie, who experienced paranormal phenomena. Robé begins by referencing past cases of mysterious apparitions in Bouxières-aux-Dames (54) that he had previously documented. He then introduces a new case from late 2003, where his friend Jean-Claude brought to his attention a video image captured by a colleague. This image, a photogram from a video, was enlarged and presented a puzzling visual.

Magalie, the witness, had undergone a serious operation and experienced the loss of a baby, which amplified her paranormal experiences. Initially, she saw shadows and then the 'aura' of people and plants. Her doctor, a photographer herself, advised her to film her visions artistically. Following this advice, Magalie used her camcorder (Canon UC-X 2 Hi Hi8) in the Vosges region, filming in places reputed to be haunted. Her camcorder would zoom in on its own, capturing luminous effects on plants and water, which she interpreted as 'aura' and vital energy.

She also knew a singer from the Nancy opera who shared similar experiences with her camcorder. Magalie reported seeing a small golden ball of light appear and disappear, and shadows moving around her. A video reference is made to Jimmy Guieu's 'Les Portes du futur' concerning 'Petits Gris' victims.

In April, during a trip to the Vosges, Magalie filmed rocks and a waterfall at Le Tendon. Her camcorder again zoomed in, revealing light sources on plants and in water, interpreted as 'aura'. She also uses a pendulum and reads books on the subject, such as 'Les Hauts lieux d'énergie' by A. Landspurg.

On the evening of July 15, 2003, while filming birds on her terrace in Méréville, she heard a baby's cry. The camcorder then zoomed towards artificial ponds and mauve flowers, where a face and a small hand gradually materialized from blurry colors. This vision lasted until it disappeared from the recording.

Magalie showed the video to the Société d'Etudes Psychiques de Nancy (SEP), which concluded there were no tricks. The SEP president interpreted the image as her deceased baby, appearing to reassure her and alleviate her guilt. Magalie, initially influenced by New Age philosophy and fantasy films, had considered a 'lutin' (elf) apparition but adopted the SEP's explanation.

A notable coincidence is that the background wood in the video sequence was named 'le bois des Morts' (the wood of the dead).

Magalie aims to develop her 'gifts,' including seeing auras and healing. Her husband, however, is skeptical, attributing the camcorder's behavior to malfunction. To counter this, Magalie purchased another camcorder, a Canon XM2, which reacted identically, while traditional cameras showed no anomalies.

The video, titled 'Le Pays des Fées-Lieux féériques,' features New Age music and commentary. The first part shows Vosges landscapes, while the second is a raw recording of the 'baby' apparition. Magalie uses two camcorders and two VCRs for editing and created the cover from a still image. She expressed interest in visiting known UFO and humanoid apparition sites like Bouxières-aux-Dames and Agincourt.

Robé's analysis suggests Magalie is a sympathetic witness, psychologically affected by her operation and the loss of her child. She channels her interest in nature, New Age, and folklore into a belief in a parallel world of positive energy. Her profession as a photographer does not involve trickery, and her interpretation of natural phenomena like sunlight reflections is subjective but therapeutically beneficial.

Article 2: LACHER DE BALLONS by Thierry Rocher

This article is a retranscription of an excerpt from a report titled "Les maîtres du monde à Evian: qui paie la facture?" broadcast on Magazine CAPITAL on M6, concerning the Evian Summit in June 2003. The report focuses on security concerns and an incident involving a paraglider.

During the summit, security officials were on alert. General Pélissier was responsible for protecting the immediate vicinity. The report highlights a scenario where a terrorist could potentially reach the hotel via paraglider. The security strategy involved intercepting any paraglider attempting to take off, with chasseurs alpins positioned on high ground.

As the report progresses, a message is heard on a walkie-talkie about a paraglider approaching from the west. The Prefect, identified as Aramis 74, and the sub-prefect, Pierre Liautaud (Base 1 Royal), are involved in the communication. The paraglider is tracked, and concerns are raised about its potential payload. The Prefect emphasizes that while not necessarily a grave event, certain actions must not be allowed to occur.

The paraglider continues its approach, coming within 500 meters of the hotel. Security personnel gather outside the command post to observe. The paraglider passes directly over the Prefect's office.

After a brief period of tension, the situation is resolved. General Touveret, commander of air defense, reveals that the 'object' was identified through three photographs. It turned out to be three balloons towing a banner with the inscription "Savoie Libre FLS" and a graphic representation of a Savoyard flag. The general concludes that vigilance was maintained and the situation was under control.

The article includes a black and white photograph of the phenomenon, taken from a paused TV screen and slightly retouched. The author, Thierry Rocher, dated the piece January 25, 2003.

Article 3: OVNI ET AVIATION: Quelques critiques du livre «OVNIS et armes secrètes américaines» de Jean-Pierre Petit, éditions Albin Michel, 2003 by Renaud Leclet

Renaud Leclet critically reviews Jean-Pierre Petit's 2003 book, "OVNIS et armes secrètes américaines," focusing on Petit's claims about secret aircraft.

Leclet challenges Petit's assertions on several points:

• Area 51: Leclet states that Area 51 is not secret and is visible on maps, alongside other known test sites like Nellis Air Force Range. He notes that these areas show military aviation test activity.
• Ajax and Aurora: Petit claims Aurora is the twin of Ajax. Leclet points out that the Ajax project was reportedly west-bound in 1993, and the Ajax at Bourget was a model, with the project classified and never having flown. He states that the name Aurora appeared erroneously in Pentagon budget forecasts in 1986 and has since disappeared from official documents.
• UMMO Dossier: Leclet asserts that the Ummites story is dubious, citing Spanish ufologists who found elements in the Ummites' letters to be questionable, despite Petit's continued support for their high quality. He also mentions that Ummites are said to practice martial arts like Chindaïo, with photographic evidence presented in 'Incroyable et Scientifique'.
• B-2 Bomber: Petit cites a journalist who reported seeing a B-2 bomber at low altitude with landing gear extended and luminous bars near the engines, attributing this to MHD. Leclet clarifies that these are reflectors for radar tracking during test flights and unrelated to MHD. He notes that while the B-2 is stealthy, military radarists must track it for safety. Leclet refutes Petit's claims about the B-2's range and operational capabilities, providing details of a mission where a B-2 flew from the USA to the Netherlands and then to Bourget, France, with multiple refuelings and pilot changes, contradicting Petit's assertion that a 12,000 km flight is difficult even with aerial refueling.
• X-47A: Petit questions whether the X-47A is subsonic or hypersonic. Leclet states that the X-47A is a pilotless combat drone, with its first flight in February 2003. He notes that Petit's book was released in January 2003, predating some of the events he discusses. He also clarifies that the X-47B is subsonic, not hypersonic, and that drones like the X-45A and Bird of Prey focus on stealth rather than extreme speed.
• B-2 Wings: Petit suggests the B-2's thick wings are due to its engines being located within them. Leclet corrects this, explaining that the wings serve as structural fuel tanks and the four General Electric F118-GE-100 turboreactors are located behind the air intakes.
• F-117A and Corsair II/T38: Petit claims the F-117A was covered by Corsair II and T38 flights, with the latter flying at night. Leclet explains that Corsair IIs and T38s had other roles, including escorting F-117s, and that night flights were common due to pilot fatigue. He also notes that the F-117s used equipment similar to that of the Corsair IIs.
• B-2 Decoys: Petit questions if the visible B-2s are decoys. Leclet dismisses this, stating that if B-2s are decoys, then everything else could be. He believes Petit misunderstands the B-2's capabilities as a long-range, subsonic bomber whose secrecy lies in its stealth technology, not its speed.
• B-2 Zigzag Trailing Edge: Petit questions the zigzag trailing edge of the B-2. Leclet suggests this information can be found in French aeronautical reviews that Petit may not have consulted.

Conclusion: Leclet concludes that while Petit's book might give the impression of aeronautical expertise, his analysis of aircraft like the B-2 and drones is flawed. Petit's insistence on MHD propulsion for these aircraft is unfounded, as their engines are terrestrial. The secrecy surrounding aircraft like the B-2 and F-117A is due to their stealth characteristics. Leclet criticizes Petit for relying on suppositions rather than verified facts, suggesting it's easier to discuss foreign aircraft than French secret prototypes that might be mistaken for UFOs.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine appears to cover a range of topics within the paranormal and ufological spectrum, from personal accounts of unexplained phenomena to critical analyses of popular theories and literature. The article by Raoul Robé presents a case study of a witness experiencing paranormal events, suggesting a connection to personal trauma and a search for meaning through alternative beliefs. The review by Renaud Leclet adopts a skeptical and fact-checking stance, aiming to debunk or correct what it perceives as misinformation in a book about secret aircraft. The editorial stance seems to be one of open inquiry into unexplained phenomena, balanced with a critical and evidence-based approach, particularly concerning technological claims. The inclusion of the Evian summit report adds a contemporary event with potential ufological implications, though it is ultimately explained conventionally.

The magazine likely caters to an audience interested in UFOs, paranormal events, and potentially fringe science and aviation topics. The tone varies from narrative and empathetic in the witness account to analytical and critical in the book review.

This issue of the magazine, dated October 2003, is titled "L'AFFAIRE du B-57B" with the subtitle "Nous l'avion pressenti ..." and is authored by Patrice Seray & Francine Cordier. It delves into several UFO-related cases and phenomena, aiming to debunk or provide rational explanations.

The B-57B Affair: A Photographic Mystery

The issue begins by examining the famous B-57B photograph, which purportedly showed a UFO alongside the aircraft. It recounts how the photo, taken in 1954 by USAF photographers for promotional material of the Martin B-57B, later became a subject of ufological speculation. The article highlights that upon developing the initial photos, a photographer noticed an unusual object in the upper right corner. In November 1964, Ralph Rankow of NICAP observed that the object appeared to have 'relief' and that its light and shadow were consistent, further fueling UFO claims.

However, the magazine presents a debunking theory proposed by Ronald Marwick. Marwick suggested that the 'object' was merely a distorted reflection of the aircraft itself, caused by layers of hot air from the sun and the B-57B's exhaust. While acknowledging Marwick's effort to avoid 'gobbling up' gratuitous claims, the authors note an 'important incompatibility' regarding the angle of the shot, which they suggest supports the 'pro' UFO stance.

The article questions whether the photograph is an exceptional document or the result of a fortunate coincidence. It asserts that the photograph was not faked, as it would have been a 'dangerous' fabrication for the USAF. Bernard Thouanel, in his book "Objets Volants Non Identifiés," is cited as suggesting that later prints of the same cliché showed the object as a 'roughly retouched shape,' as if an attempt was made to conceal a flying saucer due to emulsion defects.

Further investigation revealed that a 1980 aeronautical magazine, "Connaissance de l'Histoire," featured the B-57B in an article titled "Rôdeur nocturne" but omitted the 'UFO.' By superimposing the images, the authors found that a part of the photo was missing, including the exact location where the 'saucer' should have been. This reinforced the idea that nothing was present in the original cliché.

It is revealed that the photograph belongs to the "Smithsonian Institution" and is also featured on the official USAF website. Eric Maillot provided information that led the authors to Gilles Durand of SCEAU, who possessed an 'irrefutable document' proving that the original B-57B photograph showed no alleged UFO.

The article concludes that the 'UFO' on the right-hand enlargement (from a promotional plate) was likely an accidental addition, possibly due to a scratch on the negative or a dust particle. The two enlargements are identical in terms of the aircraft's angle, tail position, and terrain configuration. The authors state that only an examination of the original negative, with its inherent defect, could definitively reveal if it was dust or a scratch. The original photo is presented, showing no UFO in the sky; the defect, attributed to dust and then a scratch, appeared later, at which point 'ufologists' seized upon the cliché. A caption humorously reads, "Poussière je suis..." (I am dust...).

The UMMO Affair: Traces in America?

The second major section discusses the UMMO affair, framed as a comical and seemingly unbelievable case. The authors note that chance encounters can lead to discoveries, and they present photographic documents with analogies to the UMMO affair.

They recall the 1966-1967 Aluche, Spain, incident, where mysterious ground traces were found after an alleged landing. The terrain was described as 'concrete,' and it was claimed that several tons of pressure were needed to leave the imprint. This is compared to traces found in Quarouble (France, 1954) and Trans-en-Provence (France, 1981). The Aluche traces are described as a curious rectangle measuring 15x30 cm with a depth of 12 cm. The article notes a 'stunning recurrence' with three similar imprints forming an equilateral triangle of 6 meters on each side, each rectangle containing an 'X' relief.

More recently, in December 2003, near Epinal, France, similar strange imprints were discovered. These traces measured 28x39 cm and formed a triangle of 10 meters. The authors express astonishment and recognize the similarity to the UMMO traces from Spain, questioning if this was from a larger craft.

However, the article then reveals a debunking of the UMMO traces. The authors admit to having 'voluntarily fabricated' the Epinal trace. They explain that the discovery of a relief strangely similar to the Spanish traces inspired their own fabrication attempt. They state that the occurrence can be explained by a simple American army jerrycan. They add that while their jerrycan was larger, smaller, including food-grade ones, exist with dimensions identical to those found in Spain. The article presents a photo of a jerrycan and the 'ummite responsible for the trace,' humorously concluding that the Aluche landing was a 'bidon' (a pun on jerrycan and 'bogus') affair.

Photo Mystery N° 2: An Object in the Desert

This section presents a second 'Photo Mystery,' showing an object on the ground in a desert, seemingly fallen from the sky. The article poses several possibilities for its identity: the Roswell crash, the LEM, a Russian satellite reentry, a Gaulish cauldron, an Asian spacecraft, a flying soup tureen from "Les Pieds Nickelés," or the UFO of Trans-en-Provence.

The solution provided identifies the object as an Asian spacecraft: the reentry capsule of the Shenzhou 3 spacecraft, which landed in Mongolia in September 2003 after an unmanned test flight. A reference is given to an article in "Le spectacle du Monde" and "Chine" about this event.

Press Review

The magazine includes a press review section, listing articles from various publications related to ufology and astronomy. These include articles from "Télé Loisirs," "Le Bien Public," "Le Monde 2," "VSD," "Dernière Heure," and "20 minutes," covering topics such as UFO sightings, extraterrestrial intelligence research, and paranormal phenomena.

Astronomical articles mention a new Martian meteorite and two large meteorites impacting the Sahara. Seismological articles report on earthquakes in the Vosges region and Eastern France.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFO evidence, particularly photographic evidence, and the debunking of sensational claims. The magazine adopts a skeptical yet investigative stance, seeking rational explanations for phenomena often attributed to UFOs. It emphasizes the importance of original documentation and scientific analysis over anecdotal evidence and speculation. The UMMO affair and the B-57B photograph are presented as examples where initial excitement and belief were later challenged by more thorough investigation and evidence of fabrication or misinterpretation.

This document is a compilation of press reviews, primarily from French newspapers, covering a range of topics related to ufology, unexplained phenomena, and the history of scientific discovery. The reviews span several years, with articles dating from 2002 to 2004, and include content from "Le Bien Public," "L'Est Eclair," and "L'Est Républicain."

Article Summaries

"Phénomène lumineux dans le ciel" (Le Bien Public, September 11, 2002)

This section features a letter from a reader, Mme Claude Garcia, who corroborates a previous report in "Le Bien Public" about a luminous phenomenon observed in the sky. She describes seeing a bright, fast-moving object near the setting sun in early July. She hopes her personal observation might shed light on the phenomenon for the president of the astronomical society of Burgundy.

"L'énigme des crops circles" (Le Bien Public, May 3, 2003)

This article discusses the phenomenon of crop circles, noting that over four hundred appeared in a wheat field in Southern England on August 11, 2000, covering 90,000 m². The article highlights that these phenomena are multiplying globally, often near prehistoric or spiritually significant sites like Stonehenge. It references an investigation by journalist Michaël Hesemann, who suggests that these intricate designs should no longer be dismissed as mere hoaxes. The piece poses the question of whether humanity will be able to understand these mysterious signs, referencing Hesemann's book "Messages, l'énigme des « crops circles »."

"Objet volant non identifié" (Mont-sur-Meurthe, Facts Divers)

This article from an unspecified newspaper reports on an incident in Mont-sur-Meurthe where two young girls, Fanny and Yvanna (aged 11), claim to have seen a round, dark object fall into the woods. They described hearing a sound like a cannon and feeling the ground tremble. The gendarmerie initiated searches in the area, and an investigation was launched. Speculation in the village ranged from a deactivated missile to a meteorite. A gendarmerie helicopter from Metz was seen surveying the woods.

"OVNI: les recherches interrompues" (Mont-sur-Meurthe, L'Est Républicain, March 9, 2004)

This follow-up report indicates that the gendarmerie's search for the object seen by the two girls in Mont-sur-Meurthe was interrupted. The object spotted by a gendarmerie helicopter did not match the girls' description. Despite the ground search being called off, investigations were to continue to rule out all possibilities, including a meteorite. The article notes that other residents might have also felt the ground shake. The object remains unidentified.

"Une monnaie pour des échanges avec les extraterrestres" (Le Bien Public, June 7, 2004)

This article reports on a conference in Sofia, Bulgaria, where a unique cosmic currency called "galactos" was presented. Kiril Kanev, president of the Bulgarian foundation for cosmo-ethical research, proposed it as a means of payment between planets, representing Earth in universal financial relations. The currency is described as being made of chrome and nickel, weighing 3 grams, and bearing the inscription "galactos" and the year 2004. The article also touches upon Kanev's view that extraterrestrials currently contact ordinary individuals, not governments, and that high-level contact would only be possible after global peace is established.

"Une monnaie cosmique pour des échanges avec les extraterrestres" (L'Est Eclair, June 8, 2004)

This article reiterates the presentation of the "galactos" cosmic currency in Sofia, Bulgaria, during an OVNIlogie conference. It provides similar details about Kiril Kanev and the currency's specifications. The report also mentions that the Bulgarian NGO had addressed its proposal to the President, Prime Minister, and the Governor of the Bulgarian Central Bank. Kanev's perspective on extraterrestrial contact and the conditions for potential high-level communication are also included.

"L'HISTOIRE REELLE D'UNE GRANDE DECOUVERTE..." (Pages 7-10)

This lengthy piece by Marc Hallet delves into the historical scientific understanding and eventual acceptance of meteorites. It begins by challenging the common ufological narrative that scientists are inherently resistant to new evidence, using the discovery of meteorites as a counter-example. Hallet traces the evolution of the term "meteor" from a broad category encompassing various celestial phenomena (like auroras, comets, and even hail) to a more specific classification. He details how early observations of stones falling from the sky were met with skepticism, often attributed to volcanic activity or even being thrown from the ground. The article highlights key figures and events, including:

• Early Antiquity: Observation of stones falling from the sky, but difficulty reconciling this with the perceived perfection of celestial spheres.
• Volcanic Theory: The initial hypothesis that stones falling from the sky were ejected by volcanoes.
• De Lalande's Observations (1755): His account of two large, dark masses found in Bresse after a loud noise, which appeared to have melted surfaces, suggesting a strong heat source. He also noted similar events in lower Normandy.
• Abbé Bacheray's Report (1768): A detailed report to the Academy of Sciences based on testimonies.
• Lavoisier's Analysis: The analysis of a stone found near Lucé, which, while not definitively identifying its origin, ruled out lightning as the cause and suggested it might be a residue from celestial combustion or a buried stone struck by lightning.
• The 1790 Landes Event: A globe of fire followed by falling stones, initially dismissed by a local historian but later acknowledged as a phenomenon that required open-mindedness.
• The 1798 Bénarès Event: Numerous witnesses reported a large fireball and falling stones, leading the Royal Society of London to accept the reality of stones falling from the sky.
• The 1803 Laigle Event: A significant event where a luminous globe was seen, followed by cannon-like sounds and a shower of stones, some weighing over 8 kg. This event prompted a mission by Jean-Baptiste Biot, whose investigation definitively linked the testimonies and material facts, establishing the scientific reality of meteorite falls.

Hallet emphasizes that while Biot confirmed the *fall* of stones from the sky, the *source* remained a subject of debate for decades. Theories included lunar volcanoes or debris from celestial combustions. The development of astronomical catalogs and the identification of periodicities eventually led to the understanding that meteorites originate from beyond Earth, with precise orbits being calculated, revealing origins from the asteroid belt and even Mars. The article concludes by noting that the classification of "meteors" has become more refined, with "meteorites" specifically referring to objects from space, and suggests that current classifications may not be definitive, hinting at phenomena like ball lightning potentially masking other distinct events.

"MANIFESTATIONS DE L'ANNEE 2004" (Pages 5-6)

This section details upcoming and past events related to ufology organizations. It covers:

• 77th Session of CNEGU (March 6-7, 2004): Held in Grancey-le-Château, this session involved discussions, the presentation of a project to create a CDRom of early session photos, and the updating of a regional catalog of 1978 UFO sightings.
• General Assembly of SCEAU/ARCHIVES OVNI (April 3-4, 2004): Hosted in Montbard, this meeting included active members from CNEGU. It is noted that CNEGU archives have been deposited at the Departmental Archives of Lorraine since 1996.
• 78th Session of CNEGU (July 3-4, 2004): Held in Val d'Ajol, this session featured an investigator presenting his work on his department. Preparations were made for CNEGU's participation in events organized by Alain Blanchard of OVNI MARNE, specifically the commemoration of the 1954 UFO wave.
• Commemoration of the 1954 UFO Wave (September 5, 2004): An information meeting was scheduled at the Châlons-en-Champagne fair.

"LA TRIBUNE DE L'EXTERIEUR - Précisions du CNEGU" (Page 6)

This section outlines the editorial policy for "La Tribune de l'Extérieur," a rubric open to external contributors regardless of their ufological opinions. The CNEGU will not publish articles that are incorrect, disrespectful, or if there is a lack of space. The responsibility for the content rests solely with the authors, and publication does not imply endorsement by the CNEGU. The aim is to provide a platform for those without other means of expression to participate in ufological debate.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The collection of articles reflects a strong interest in unexplained aerial phenomena, particularly UFO sightings and the enigmatic crop circles. There is also a focus on the scientific process, exemplified by the detailed historical account of meteorite discovery, which serves to illustrate how scientific understanding evolves over time, often through persistent investigation and the eventual acceptance of evidence. The CNEGU, as the organizing body behind some of these events, appears to be a central hub for ufological research and discussion in France, actively documenting sightings, organizing meetings, and providing a platform for diverse viewpoints within the field.

This issue of "Mystères de l'Est", specifically issue number 6, dated March 6, 1999, delves into complex topics at the intersection of ufology, physics, and philosophy. The cover headline, "Rendons à César ...", hints at a re-evaluation of established ideas. The issue features contributions that critically examine UFO phenomena, scientific methodology, and the nature of time and matter.

Article: Rendons à César ... (Page 2)

This section addresses an article by Patrice Vachon (CNEGU) titled "Observation d'un phénomène curieux le 19 octobre 1726 en Côte d'Or et autres lieux," published on March 6, 1999. Vachon's article discussed a luminous phenomenon that was interpreted as a UFO but was actually an exceptional aurora borealis, as explained by physicist Jacques de Mairan (1678-1771). The editorial notes that while Vachon's article brought this interesting episode to light, he was not the first to identify its scientific significance. Marc Hallet, a reader and collaborator, had previously highlighted this parallel between scientific writings and less scientific ufological interpretations in his 1988 booklet "PRODIGES CELESTES." Hallet's work cautioned against approaching ufological writings that seek to extract supposed prodigies from the past, often interpreting them through a "saucer-shaped" lens. The article specifically mentions Hallet's analysis of Mairan's observation of the 1726 event, comparing it to the writings of ufologists like Michel Bougard (President of SOBEPS). The editorial concludes that Vachon's article, while not offering new contributions to the UFO dossier, serves to remind readers of this instructive episode about the scientific method and its opposite, and to spotlight Hallet's valuable publication.

Article: Résumons et concluons (Page 1)

This section, dated May 10, 2002, from Liège by Marc Hallet, summarizes and concludes on the nature of scientific inquiry versus ufological approaches. Hallet contrasts the rigorous, evidence-based methodology of science in understanding phenomena like meteorites with the less rigorous approach in ufology. He notes that scientists have always been open to hypotheses but distinguished them from proven facts. Through analysis of testimonies and material traces, science has progressively explained phenomena. In contrast, ufology, over 50 years, has accumulated disparate testimonies and contradictory analyses without achieving coherent progress. Hallet criticizes the tendency in ufology to present hypotheses as factual demonstrations, calling it a methodological aberration and even intellectual fraud. He references a professor of science history who attempted to bridge the history of meteorite discovery with ufology, deeming this a desperate attempt revealing the mindset of some ufology adherents.

Article: Réflexions personnelles (Pages 3-10)

This series of articles by Jean-Pierre Delbarre explores various personal reflections on physics and UFO phenomena.

L'inertie (Pages 3-4)

Delbarre begins by defining inertia as an object's resistance to changes in its state of motion. He discusses how forces like centrifugal force act on rotating objects and how magnetic forces might counteract inertial effects in a hypothetical UFO. He touches upon the concept of magnetic anti-gravity and the potential for a UFO to operate without reaction to a released force. He also considers the role of ambient pressure in densifying objects and its relation to inertia, mentioning Archimedes' principle and the effect of planetary rotation. Delbarre then delves into theories of anti-gravity, suggesting that mass might be due to external quantum pressure and that inertia could be variable. He posits that in a vacuum, inertia would be minimal, and deformations would be slight due to low medium resistance.

La MHD (sans prétention) (Page 4)

This section speculates on the use of Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) for UFO propulsion, as proposed by astrophysicist Jean-Pierre Petit. Delbarre suggests that the Lorentz force could create air vortices around a UFO. He considers how the interaction of superheated gas with natural light might alter the appearance of an object, potentially making it difficult to discern. He also notes that some UFOs have side lights, indicating rotation, which could be calculated.

La relativité d'un temps n'existant pas (à mon avis) (Pages 5-6)

Delbarre expresses skepticism about the concept of time, particularly Einstein's theory of time dilation. He argues that the idea of time being relative leads to absurd conclusions, such as a deceased person appearing to be alive to a fast-moving observer. He believes that time is not a fundamental reality but an invention, and that the perceived differences in time are due to the speed of light's propagation and the observer's frame of reference, not an actual difference in the flow of time. He uses examples of distant events and clocks to illustrate his point, concluding that time is simplistic and erroneously validated.

Le voyage dans un pseudo temps! (Page 6)

This section discusses the idea of UFO pilots being time travelers. Delbarre argues that if they were future humans, they would belong to a specific era and not be timeless. He suggests that their physical knowledge might be more advanced, but they would still be bound by physical laws. He proposes that if time travel were possible, carbon-14 dating could be used to verify the age of any sampled material from the past.

LES MATERIALISATIONS ET DEMATERIALISATIONS (CHAMPS INCIDENTS) (Pages 7-10)

This extensive section explores the phenomena of materialization and dematerialization, often associated with UFOs and alien encounters.

#### Approfondissements (Page 9)

Delbarre discusses the cold temperature of some humanoid entities that appear to materialize. He suggests that their bodies might be isolated from the material environment, with their atomic and molecular constituents experiencing minimal interaction and energy excitation, leading to a lack of heat production. He speculates that such beings might not require respiration or caloric intake. He also touches upon the idea that the refractive properties of matter might make some objects appear invisible or impalpable. He questions how a physical creature would survive in a vacuum and considers the role of atmospheric pressure and the composition of air.

#### Les taux vibratoires ou plans de réalités (Page 9)

This part delves into the concept of different vibrational rates or planes of reality. Delbarre suggests that materialization and dematerialization might involve shifting between these planes. He argues that a physical creature suddenly in a vacuum would likely burst, unlike a dematerialized being. He also considers the possibility that some beings do not respire, which aligns with the idea of dematerialization and the absence of respiratory systems observed in some alleged alien autopsies. He notes that some beings might have evolved psychically at the expense of physical senses.

#### Corps froids vaporeux (Page 10)

Delbarre speculates that these "cold, vaporous bodies" might absorb certain wavelengths of solar radiation. He suggests that a spectroscope might reveal the presence of invisible elements. He posits that this invisibility might be due to a lack of radiation emission, but not necessarily a lack of detectable presence. He also considers the possibility of temporary dematerialization of porous rocks.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critical examination of ufological claims, the importance of rigorous scientific methodology, and the exploration of unconventional physics concepts like MHD and the nature of time and matter. The editorial stance appears to be one of skepticism towards unsubstantiated ufological assertions, advocating for a scientific approach while remaining open to exploring complex physical phenomena and challenging established paradigms. There is a clear emphasis on distinguishing between scientific evidence and speculative interpretations.

This issue of "OVNI du passé" (UFOs of the Past) by Axel Mazuer, published in 2004, provides a detailed examination of historical UFO sightings, drawing upon ancient texts, chronicles, and manuscripts. The publication aims to update, clarify, and offer precise details regarding these past events.

Historical UFO Sightings in China and Japan

The article begins by discussing historical UFO cases in China and Japan, referencing Richard D. Nolane's work "Autrefois les Ovni." It highlights the "Catalogue général des étoiles filantes et autres météores observés en Chine pendant vingt-quatre siècles" by Ed. Biot as a primary source. The author notes that this catalogue, available at the Bibliothèque Nationale de France Richelieu, is a valuable resource for researchers, despite being a secondary source. The original sources for Biot's work include the recueil of Ma-touan-lin and astronomical sections of Chinese dynastic annals. A particularly interesting case, potentially overlooked by ufologists, is cited from page 211 of Biot's catalogue: on October 18, 1605, an object described as large as a cup, with a glow like a flame, appeared near Nanjing, reached the ground, and then disappeared erratically.

The Case of Charles the Bald and Other Medieval European Sightings

The article then shifts to European historical accounts, referencing Michel Bougard's "La chronique des OVNI." A curious event involving King Charles II the Bald (Charles le Chauve) is described, based on a manuscript (n° 2447) from the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris. The account details an encounter with a being of 'brilliant whiteness' wielding a 'weapon emitting an extraordinary glow, like a comet.' This being reportedly took the King on a journey, protecting him from wild animals with a blinding light. The author clarifies that the manuscript in question is a Latin manuscript (Lat.2447) and that the "Visio Caroli" text refers to Charles the Fat, not Charles the Bald. The manuscript is identified as a copy from the 13th century, containing a text from the late 9th century.

Further historical cases are explored, including a report from the "Gazette de Nuremberg" concerning a 'very frightening vision' on April 14, 1561, described as an aerial combat. This is linked to an illustration from the Wickiana collection at the central library of Zurich. Another case from August 1566 in Bâle is also mentioned. The article also examines an event from October 12, 1621, in Nîmes, France, reported in a monograph titled "Les signes effroyables nouvellement apparus en l'air."

The Nuremberg Chronicle and the Arras Sighting

A significant portion of the article is dedicated to the "Nuremberg Chronicle" (also known as "Chronica universelle de Schedel") by Hartmann Schedel. The author confirms that this manuscript contains a depiction of a UFO in its Sixth Part, "Sixth Epoch of the World." The illustration, dated around 1000 AD (though the book was published in 1493), shows a 'flamboyant, distinctly artificial, parallelepiped platform' suspended in the sky above two green hills. The article notes that Schedel also depicted natural phenomena, making the UFO's depiction stand out as non-natural. A reproduction of this chronicle was published by Taschen in 2001.

The article also details a sighting in Arras, France, on November 1, 1461. Based on a manuscript by Jacques Duclerc, a chronicler for Duke Philippe le Bon, the event describes a brilliant object, like an iron bar, long and wide as half the moon, which remained stationary before twisting, tumbling, and ascending. The author notes that the original manuscript describes the object's movement as a spiral, rather than the more elaborate 'twisting like a watch spring' often cited in modern accounts. The measurements provided in the manuscript are also more precise than those in later interpretations.

Other Historical Accounts and Analysis

Additional historical accounts are presented, including a report from Pierre Boistuau's "Histoires prodigieuses" concerning an event near Tübingen on December 5, 1557, which involved unusual clouds and fiery lights. The article also references a report from "La Gazette de Nuremberg" about a 'very frightening vision' on April 4, 1561, which inspired a Renaissance-era engraving depicting an aerial battle.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout the article is the investigation of historical anomalies that appear to be UFO sightings, using rigorous textual analysis of ancient and medieval documents. The author emphasizes the importance of consulting original sources and critically evaluating secondary accounts. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious inquiry into historical evidence of unexplained aerial phenomena, presenting findings from various researchers and historical texts without definitive conclusions but with a clear interest in the subject matter.

Title: Le Courrier des Lecteurs
Issue: 7/7
Volume: N° 8
Date: February 2004
Publisher: CNEGU
Country: France
Language: French

This issue of 'Le Courrier des Lecteurs' presents a collection of reader contributions and editorial analyses focusing on UFO phenomena, often intertwined with discussions about natural phenomena, particularly birds.

Articles and Contributions

Réflexions à la lecture des MDE N° 8 by Ghislaine Bonnier

Ghislaine Bonnier opens with a question about a flying object from Gallio, Italy, and then delves into the characteristics of owls and other nocturnal birds, comparing them to potential UFO descriptions. She discusses species like the Effraie, Chevêche, and Grand Duc, noting their physical traits and habitats. Bonnier questions whether some sightings might be misidentified birds, referencing a case where a 'small green being' was seen by a hunter, and suggests it could be a bird. She concludes by posing the question to the readers for their interpretation.

Précisions sur le courrier de M. SERAY Patrice

This section provides clarifications regarding a previous correspondence from Patrice Seray. It emphasizes the ability of nocturnal birds to distinguish colors and their keen eyesight, mentioning the 'nictitating membrane' and large eyes of predators like the Grand Duc and Chevêche. The text highlights how the yellow iris of these birds can give them a fierce appearance, leading to historical persecution due to superstition. It also notes that owls typically nest in tree hollows or difficult-to-access locations.

Réponse de M. Patrice SERAY

Patrice Seray responds to previous correspondence, acknowledging the complexity of UFO cases and the potential for confusion with animals. He suggests that misidentifications with animals like owls and hiboux might be more frequent than initially suspected. Seray recounts a case from St-Mandrier (near La Seyne/Mer) in June 1977, where a hunter saw a small green being. He then shares a second-hand account from a friend about a similar encounter in October 1976, involving a small, green, sixty-centimeter-tall figure with round, dark-circled eyes, described as wearing a downy, luminous grey 'robe'. Seray analyzes this second account, noting similarities in the description (small size, green color, downy covering) to a bird, specifically a owl perched on a rock. He posits that the creature might have been a bird of prey surprised by the hunter and his dog. While acknowledging the possibility of a hoax, Seray suggests that a bird of prey could explain the mystery, finding his hypothesis less far-fetched after considering contributions from CNEGU.

Le Pêle Mêle

This section contains several short items:

• Un Martien à Paris: Reports on the screening of the 1960 French science fiction film 'Un Martien à Paris' starring Darry Cowl. The film features a Martian landing in a saucer and investigating Earth. The article notes the director's difficulty in finding a producer due to science fiction being unpopular in France at the time.
• Une observation parisienne expliquée par le CNEGU, suite à cet email: An email from 'rio' describes an observation over South Paris on January 15, 2004, of two clear bluish/greenish streaks, lasting 15 minutes. A response from Xavier suggests this might be related to a previous observation.
• Réponse de Raoul Robé ('Cnégusien' habitant à Montrouge): Raoul Robé offers explanations for the Paris observation, suggesting it could be related to light beams from the Porte d'Orléans, the Eiffel Tower's rotating beam, or 'sky tracers'. He also mentions Belgian triangles seen due to aircraft.
• Réponse du témoin: The original witness, 'Xavlexav', expresses embarrassment and acknowledges that the explanation was effective, humorously stating it taught him not to 'believe in UFOs'.
• Le mythe sévit partout...: Mentions a scene in the 1997 Z-movie 'L'attaque de la Pin-Up géant' where a witness recounts a UFO encounter, but the journalist misses the ETs.
• Dans la pub: Notes a February advertising campaign by the shoe store 'Courrir' featuring 'petits gris' (greys) and their saucers to promote sports shoes.
• Le cas argentin cité dans le rapport COMETA expliqué ?: Discusses the Cometa report's valorization of the Bariloche case (Argentina, July 31, 1995), where a Boeing 727 encountered a bright light. A website is provided for more details.

Explication convaincante pour un ovni filmé par Apollo 16 !

This article explains an image from NASA, initially considered a UFO near the Apollo 16 capsule on April 27, 1972. The object has been identified as the EVA (spacewalk) floodlight/boom, an element of the Apollo service module. The study was conducted by the Johnson Space Center.

Observation en Iran. OVNI ou Vénus ?

An engineer, Abi Golbazi, recorded a 20-minute video of an unusual object in the sky over East Haven on April 30, 2004. The article notes that Iran was subsequently inundated with extraterrestrial observations. The Iranian astronomy society speculated it could be a satellite, spy plane, or Venus. The witness, however, is convinced it was not. The video is considered with caution due to potential video artifacts, and Venus is suggested as a possible explanation if the filming was not well-controlled.

Kelly-Hopkinsville (suite)

This section mentions a Californian company producing a DVD about the Kelly-Hopkinsville legend, including photos and old film footage. It refers to previous articles by Renaud Leclet and indicates continued interest in the subject.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the analysis and explanation of UFO sightings. There's a strong emphasis on rational explanations, particularly the misidentification of natural phenomena, especially nocturnal birds like owls. The editorial stance appears to favor critical examination and logical deduction, while still acknowledging the enduring mystery and fascination surrounding UFOs. The inclusion of reader contributions and historical references suggests an ongoing dialogue and investigation into these phenomena within the ufological community.

Title: Temps libre
Issue: 10/10
Date: May 1967 (cover date for Dossier Marliens, but content spans later dates)
Publisher: C.N.E.G.U.
Country: France
Language: French

This issue of Temps libre magazine, presented as a publication of C.N.E.G.U., features a special "DOSSIER MARLIENS" on its cover, dated May 1967, but the content spans a much wider period, including articles and reports from 2003, 2004, and historical accounts dating back to 1947.

Articles and Reports

Coup de feu (Firefight)

This short piece humorously debunks a potential UFO sighting, revealing the "extraterrestrial vessels" to be simple IKEA barbecues from their summer 2003 catalogue. It notes that the magazine "Marianne" featured these items in its "400 coups" section, clarifying they were not UFOs but barbecues, and mentions competing models like a spherical one on legs.

OVNI ou Méprise? (UFO or Mistake?)

This article reports on an unidentified flying object filmed in southern Turkey, near Mersin, by police. The object, described as dark red with yellow-green tones, circular, emitting lights, and in constant movement, was sighted and filmed twice over a 10-day period in July 2004. It hovered over an industrial zone for 1 hour and 20 minutes and later over a refinery for two hours. The recordings were sent to Turkish space research centers. A note suggests a possible misidentification with the planet Venus, which was rising at the time.

Soucoupe ou voiture? (Saucer or Car?)

This section discusses a solar-powered car named "Radiance" that traveled over 7000 km, resembling a flying saucer. It references an article from "La Liberté de l'Est" dated August 2, 2000, and notes that the car beat a previous record of 4000 km. The accompanying photo shows the solar car.

Mars attaque! (Mars Attacks!)

This piece is a playful commentary on a beer brand, "Bière de Mars" (Mars Beer), by Loburg, which used E.T.-themed advertising in the spring of 2003-2004. The article humorously links the beer's marketing to alien invasion themes, with phrases like "escadrille, séparation, vive lumière, faisceau directif..." and advises consumption "with moderation."

Une journée de "fête des extraterrestres"? (A Day for "Alien Fest"?)

This article discusses a proposal by New Mexico Representative Dan Foley to establish an annual "Alien Fest" on the second Thursday of February in Roswell, USA, to honor visitors from space. It questions whether such a celebration would ever come to France and notes the irony of celebrating alien visitors in February when the main event in Roswell (the 1947 crash site) occurs in July.

Cocktail OVNI : pour voir les petits hommes roses! (UFO Cocktail: To See the Little Pink Men!)

This section provides a recipe for a cocktail named "OVNI," consisting of vodka, dry vermouth, triple sec orange liqueur, and a dash of Campari. It's presented as a lighthearted addition to the UFO theme.

Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre (Making the Sky the Most Beautiful Place on Earth)

This short piece references an Air France slogan used in a 1999 advertisement, comparing it to childhood memories and noting that the experience is now via airplane. The source is cited as National Geographic (France), Vol. 1.3, No. 3, December 1999.

La fin du SEPRA? (The End of SEPRA?)

This article discusses the ambiguous news of the potential closure of SEPRA (Service d'expertise des phénomènes de rentrées atmosphériques) by CNES, as reported in "Ciel et Espace." It notes the mixed reactions within the French ufology community and quotes Grégory Guttierez's contact with Arnaud Benedetti, Director of Communication at CNES, to clarify the situation. The article suggests that budget reasons might be behind the potential closure, despite SEPRA's research being valuable.

Un ovni devant le soleil ? (A UFO in front of the Sun?)

This article explains the astronomical phenomenon of the transit of Venus across the Sun, which occurred on June 8, 2004. It notes that this event, while spectacular and allowing for precise distance measurements to the Sun, was observed without any unusual or "insolites" events being reported, unlike some solar eclipses.

GENERALITES - OVNI

This section, extracted from "Le Quid 2004," provides a general overview of UFOs (Objets Volants Non Identifiés). It defines UFOs, lists their common characteristics (luminosity, hovering, acceleration, etc.), and discusses various interpretations, including psychological, natural, military, and extraterrestrial hypotheses. It also details observed side effects on witnesses and the environment. The historical section highlights key dates and events, including the Kenneth Arnold sighting in 1947, the Roswell incident, and notable cases in France (Trans-en-Provence) and Belgium. It mentions the alleged use of advanced aircraft like F117 stealth jets in relation to Belgian sightings.

ORGANISMES DIVERS (Various Organizations)

This section lists numerous international organizations dedicated to UFO research, including those in Australia, Belgium, Spain, the United States, France, Great Britain, Italy, Sweden, and Switzerland. It provides contact information, publication details, and brief descriptions of their activities.

DOSSIER MARLIENS

This is a separate publication, a "HORS SÉRIE DU C.N.E.G.U.," titled "LES DOSSIERS DU CNEGU - MARLIENS," dated May 1967, with an "ANNÉE 1998" stamp. It is described as a 63-page document available for purchase. The page includes a form for ordering the document.

SOLUTION de la Photo Mystère N° 1 (Solution to Mystery Photo No. 1)

This article reveals that a "magnificent saucer" shown in a previous photograph was actually an inflatable structure, likely a promotional balloon. By comparing its size to the people in the image, its diameter is estimated to be between 7 and 8 meters. The article notes that attachment points for suspension wires might have been retouched or that the object was in free flight.

Le SCEAU/Archives OVNI co-édite ou diffuse ces ouvrages (SCEAU/Archives OVNI co-publishes or distributes these works)

This section details three books published or distributed by SCEAU/Archives OVNI:

1. APPROCHE SOCIOPSYCHOLOGIQUE DU PHENOMENE OVNI by J-M. Abrassart: A mémoire on UFOs, examining psychological and sociological aspects, including science fiction, altered states of consciousness, and analysis of testimonies. It questions the validity of the sociopsychological paradigm and discusses the crisis in ufology.
2. L'AFFAIRE DE TRANS-EN-PROVENCE by SERPAN: A limited edition booklet offering a new perspective on the famous Trans-en-Provence landing case, based on an investigation by the SERPAN association. It includes documents, analyses, and press clippings.
3. L'AFFAIRE D. ou : Retour sur une affaire vieille de 40 ans by Bruno Bousquet: A re-edition of a book detailing a close encounter case from April 1955 involving Georges Dassas. The author conducted a five-year investigation, and the book provides full details of the affair.

The section also provides ordering information for these books, including payment methods for Belgium, France, and other countries.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the phenomenon of UFOs and related topics, ranging from alleged sightings and scientific explanations to cultural interpretations and the organizational landscape of ufology. There's a clear interest in documenting cases, analyzing them from various perspectives (psychological, sociological, scientific), and providing resources for further research through organization listings and book reviews. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, presenting information and allowing readers to form their own conclusions, while also debunking hoaxes or misidentifications with a touch of humor. The inclusion of cocktail recipes and humorous takes on advertising suggests a desire to engage readers on multiple levels, not solely through dry reporting.