Mysteres De L'Est - No 05 - 1999

Magazine Overview

Title: LES MYSTÈRES DE L'EST
Issue: N° 5
Volume: 5
Date: Année 1999
Publisher: CNEGU (Comité Nord-Est des Groupes Ufologiques)
Country: France
Language: French
ISSN: 1277-5533

This issue of 'Les Mystères de l'Est' is a bulletin dedicated to ufology, published by the CNEGU. It presents a collection of articles, investigations, and discussions related to UFO phenomena, drawing from both historical and contemporary cases. The cover features a hexagonal collage of illustrations depicting various scenes, including human figures, landscapes, and buildings, hinting at the diverse content within.

Editorial

The editorial, titled "Avec l'été, les ovnis sont réapparus dans la presse française" (With summer, UFOs have reappeared in the French press), reflects on the recent coverage of UFOs in French media. The author notes that while some publications still focus on older cases or sensationalized accounts of alien encounters, there is a growing recognition of the phenomenon, even within the scientific community, particularly in the United States. The editorial mentions the work of SEPRA, an official French organization with a large archive of UFO cases, and contrasts it with the perceived lack of transparency from American military archives. It also critiques a VSD article for misinterpreting the Pocantico report and discusses how popular science magazines like 'Science & Vie' are beginning to address the topic, albeit with a degree of skepticism towards ufological associations.

The editorial also touches upon an article by Philippe Henarejos titled "OVNIS la fin du tabou" (UFOs the end of the taboo), which, despite its title, focuses more on exobiology and the SETI program. It then shifts to the more grounded work of "amateurs éclairés" (enlightened amateurs), highlighting a wave of UFO observations in the Ardennes and Haute-Marne regions in August 1998, which prompted investigations by CNEGU members.

Table of Contents

The issue's table of contents reveals a comprehensive range of topics:

Les travaux du CNEGU (CNEGU's work)

• This section delves into specific CNEGU investigations and analyses, including:
• "Une abduction en 1929!" (An abduction in 1929!): An examination of a historical case, likely fictionalized, from the novel "La roue fulgurante."
• "Similitude entre Science Fiction et ufologie" (Similarity between Science Fiction and ufology): An article exploring parallels between fictional depictions of UFOs and real-world sightings.
• "Vins-sur-Caramy (Var) : un djinn survint!" (Vins-sur-Caramy (Var): a djinn appeared!): A case study from the Var region.
• "Et maintenant une page de publicité" (And now a page of advertising): Possibly a meta-commentary or a humorous piece.
• "Tobor, le retour A Propos d'une rencontre du 'Quatrième type'" (Tobor, the return About a 'Fourth type' encounter): Discussing a specific type of encounter.
• "Jusqu'aux confins de l'absurde ... suivez le Guide!" (To the ends of the absurd... follow the Guide!): An article exploring unusual or extreme cases.
• "L'OVNI Ardennais de 23h 38." (The Ardennes UFO of 11:38 PM.): A specific case from the Ardennes.
• "OVNI: rapide analyse des cas du VSD Hors Série" (UFO: quick analysis of cases from VSD Hors Série): A critical review of a VSD publication.
• "Evolution du vol de nuit dans l'ALAT et similitudes avec les observations UFO" (Evolution of night flight in ALAT and similarities with UFO observations): Examining military aviation and its relation to UFO sightings.
• "Ufologie ou mythologie ? La est la question" (Ufology or mythology? That is the question): A philosophical or theoretical piece.
• "Enquête à Prauthoy (Haute-Marne) 10 août 1998 / 22h55.": A detailed investigation report.
• "Jeu ufologique Menez l'enquête" (Ufological game: Conduct the investigation): An interactive or game-like approach to ufology.

Les Ovni dans la presse (UFOs in the press)

• This section analyzes media coverage of UFOs:
• "Transcription d'un débat radio cacophonique" (Transcription of a cacophonous radio debate): A report on a chaotic radio discussion.
• "Revue de presse: - OVNI Ardennais et autres! - Le coin des sectes -" (Press review: - Ardennes UFOs and others! - The corner of the sects -): A compilation of press clippings.
• "Méprises aérostatiques, astronautiques, astronomiques - Mais aussi - L'OVNI et ses satellites - Le Professeur Maubeuge nous a quitté ..." (Aerostatic, astronautic, astronomical misidentifications - But also - The UFO and its satellites - Professor Maubeuge has left us...): Discussing misidentifications and noting the passing of Professor Maubeuge.

La tribune de l'extérieur (The tribune from outside)

• This section features external contributions and topics:
• "L'affaire UMMO: Sectes, soucoupes, Sexe et services secrets, De 1947 à 1998, mouvements et formes identiques" (The UMMO affair: Sects, saucers, Sex and secret services, From 1947 to 1998, identical movements and forms): An in-depth look at the UMMO case.
• "Invitation pour les repas ufologiques Parisiens" (Invitation for Parisian ufological meals): Information about ufology gatherings.
• "Recherches d'idées, idées de recherches" (Research for ideas, ideas for research): A call for contributions or discussion.
• "Traductions (Fortean Time)": Translated articles from 'Fortean Time'.
• "Le pôle documentaire de Metz (Communiqué du SCEAU)" (The documentary center of Metz (SCEAU Communiqué)): Information about a documentary resource.

Le courrier des lecteurs (Readers' mail)

• This section includes correspondence from readers:
• "Jean-Marc Gillot nous écrit" (Jean-Marc Gillot writes to us).
• "Didier Charmey de l'association Nexus."
• "Pays de Bourgogne : Pierres et Légendes de Côte d'Or (livre)" (Burgundy Region: Stones and Legends of the Côte d'Or (book)): A book review or mention.

Le pêle-mêle (The jumble)

• This section contains miscellaneous items:
• "Pêle-mêle": General miscellaneous content.
• "Temps libre : Lectures conseillées" (Free time: Recommended readings): A list of suggested books or articles.

The issue concludes with "avec les pages d'humour signées Raoul Robé" (with humor pages signed Raoul Robé).

Key Articles and Investigations

"Une abduction en 1929!"
This article examines Jean De La Hire's 1929 novel, "La roue fulgurante" (The Blazing Wheel), which is described as a sensational adventure novel. The novel depicts a spaceship, described as a modern "flying saucer," that surveys and destroys habitations while abducting terrified earthlings. The text includes an excerpt detailing a "luminous wheel" that moves with dizzying speed, emitting green light beams from a central black ball. This craft stops, turns, and then appears to abduct individuals, causing a blinding flash and rendering a character unconscious. The reference points to the book itself as the source.

"Similitude entre Science Fiction et Soucoupes"
This section, authored by Raoul Robé in 1997, discusses how the re-edition of 1950s American comic books allows for a discovery of how artists like Wallace Wood envisioned flying saucers. The article highlights elements found in these comics, such as flying saucers, small ETs with large brains and bulging eyes, underground bases, paralyzing tube weapons, and alien abductions in New York. It features artwork from "The Flying Saucers: Spawn of Terror," originally printed in 'Flying Saucers #1' in 1950, with art reconstruction by Greg Theakston.

Editorial Discussion on Press Coverage
The editorial provides a critical overview of French press coverage of UFOs. It notes the reappearance of UFO topics in the summer, with publications like VSD featuring articles. The editorial acknowledges the work of SEPRA, an official body with 3000 unique archives, but expresses disappointment that French ufologists cannot access them. It criticizes a VSD interpretation of the Pocantico report and a 'Science & Vie' article that, while covering a US conference, dismisses ufological associations. The editorial contrasts this with the more direct investigations undertaken by CNEGU members following media events like "Nuit des soucoupes."

CNEGU's Work and Regional Focus
The presentation of the CNEGU highlights its thirty-year dedication to collecting information on UFO phenomena. Their primary activity involves verifying witness testimonies through investigations and inquiries. Since 1978, associations in the northeast of France have united under CNEGU to coordinate regional work. The committee focuses on specific studies (statistical, sociological, historical) and has built a significant documentation base concerning regions like Champagne, Ardennes, Bourgogne, and Lorraine. CNEGU collaborates with other French and foreign researchers and public organizations. They aim to systematically collect national data to improve understanding of the unexplained UFO phenomenon and publish "Les Mystères de l'Est" to disseminate their findings. The current members of CNEGU are listed as Ghislam Domine, Gilles Durand, Francine Juncosa, Patrick Foumel, Renaud Leclet, Eric Maillot, Gilles Munsch, Raoul Robé, and Christine Zwygar.

• Specific Case Investigations
• The issue details several investigations:
• Ardennes UFO (23:38): A specific case from the Ardennes region.
• Prauthoy (Haute-Marne) Investigation: An inquiry into a sighting on August 10, 1998, at 22:55.
• Vins-sur-Caramy (Var): A case involving a "djinn."
• Luçon Case (February 9, 1976): A case previously identified as unidentified by GEPAN, discussed in relation to lunar influences.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include the analysis of UFO phenomena through scientific and investigative lenses, the comparison of UFOs with science fiction, the critical examination of media coverage, and the detailed reporting of specific case investigations conducted by the CNEGU. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical engagement with both official and media narratives, emphasizing the importance of rigorous investigation and data collection by amateur researchers while acknowledging the growing, albeit sometimes hesitant, interest in the subject from mainstream sources. There is a clear focus on French cases and regional research, underscoring the CNEGU's commitment to documenting and understanding UFO activity within its geographical area.

This issue, titled "SIMILITUDE ENTRE SCIENCE FICTION ET SOUCOUPES VOLANTES" (Similarity Between Science Fiction and Flying Saucers) and "SIMILITUDE ENTRE SCIENCE FICTION ET UFOLOGIE" (Similarity Between Science Fiction and Ufology), explores the intersection of science fiction narratives and real-world UFO reports. It features a comic strip and detailed articles analyzing various UFO incidents, often drawing parallels to science fiction tropes and offering potential terrestrial explanations.

Comic Strip: The Flying Saucers - First Contact

The issue includes a comic strip titled "THE FLYING SAUCERS PART TWO FIRST CONTACT." The narrative begins with pilots spotting and reporting fast-moving flying saucers. One pilot, Ross Lanning, experiences a dream-like encounter with alien beings who communicate with him, revealing their purpose and offering reassurance. The aliens explain that they had to act as they did and that they will not let him fall. The comic also touches upon the idea of advanced alien civilizations and their superior technology.

ARDAN Magazine Feature: Clark and the XB-45

A French magazine, ARDAN, is highlighted for an episode published in 1956. It recounts the exploits of test pilot CLARK, who tests a prototype XB-45. Departing from the secret "Murdock" base, CLARK encounters an unusual aerial squadron of "flying saucers." After numerous twists, CLARK is captured by a hidden black civilization on an island, possessing superior technology. This civilization's city, akin to Atlantis, has a tower capable of destroying the world with a single electromagnetic discharge.

Vins-sur-Caramy (VAR): A Djinn Survives!

This article by Eric Maillot details an event on April 14, 1957, in Vins-sur-Caramy, France. Jimmy Guicu, chief investigator for CIE Ouranos, covered the event where two women, Mmes Gracin and Rami, witnessed a strange, matte, cone-shaped metallic object land with a deafening noise. The object, about 1.50m high and 1m wide, exhibited vibrating metallic rods and affected nearby indicator panels. M. Jules Boglio also observed the object take off, jump over the road, and land again in a nearby path. The object then flew off towards the Southeast silently at moderate speed. Gendarmes investigating the site found the ground swept by a powerful blast, with a 1.50m diameter zone cleared. The article notes that the object's magnetic remnants deviated compasses. The author, E. Maillot, strongly suggests that this 'UFO' was likely a French SO-1221 helicopter, known as the Djinn, used for uranium prospecting. He points out similarities in size, shape, and behavior, including its ability to hover close to the ground and create ground disturbances. The article concludes that many UFO cases can be explained by misidentifying conventional aircraft, especially when combined with witness age and potential biases.

Other UFO Mentions and Analysis

Further sections discuss other UFO-related incidents and concepts. One passage mentions ETs releasing an ovoid craft reminiscent of the Socorro UFO. It also references the Roswell autopsy. The article "SIMILITUDE ENTRE SCIENCE FICTION ET UFOLOGIE" by Raoul Robé discusses an English science fiction comic from March 16, 1956, about extraterrestrials visiting Earth and collecting samples of villages, monuments, and even a liner, drawing parallels to S. Spielberg's film "Close Encounters of the Third Kind." Another section describes a black mass over Caspahan and a saucer descending on London, with figures emerging to head towards the "Institut National." The author emphasizes that many UFO cases lack folklore or extraterrestrial elements and are simply verifiable events. The article concludes by urging ufologists to focus on empirical verification rather than theoretical discourse.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the blurred lines between science fiction and actual UFO sightings, the analysis of specific UFO cases with a focus on potential misidentifications, and the role of technology (both alien and human) in these events. The editorial stance leans towards a skeptical and analytical approach, favoring logical explanations and empirical evidence over sensationalism or purely theoretical speculation. The issue encourages a grounded, investigative approach to ufology, suggesting that many phenomena can be explained by terrestrial means, such as advanced aircraft or misinterpretations of known technology.

This issue of a French ufology publication, dated July 1998, features a cover story by Francine Juncosa titled "ET MAINTENANT ? ... UNE PAGE DE PUBLICITE !" which critically examines the banalization of the UFO phenomenon and the role of misidentification. The magazine also includes articles by Raoul Robé and Eric Maillot, an interview with ufologist Robert Fischer, and a satirical cartoon.

"ET MAINTENANT ? ... UNE PAGE DE PUBLICITE !" by Francine Juncosa

Francine Juncosa argues that the UFO phenomenon is often trivialized, leading to frequent misidentifications. She posits that certain observation conditions can contribute to these errors. Juncosa cites examples from "La Ligne Bleue Survolée ? N° 25 (1992)" where UFOs were presented as commonplace in educational materials, suggesting this normalization makes them seem like a certain reality. She also references a 1987 survey of UFO/ET information broadcast on French television, compiled by Thierry Rocher, as evidence of this banalization through repetition. Furthermore, she notes the inclusion of "OVNI" as an acronym alongside UNESCO and ONU in the July 1998 Reader's Digest guide "Le guide pratique du français d'aujourd'hui," and mentions educational software featuring extraterrestrials. Juncosa also points to an article in "Mystères de l'Est" titled "TOBOR, LE RETOUR," highlighting the influence of information, regardless of its nature, on witness testimonies.

Juncosa then analyzes a specific observation from September 6, 1998, near Voreppe (Isère), where a family reported seeing a UFO. Media outlets like "Liberté de l'Est" and "L'Est Républicain" explained this as a dark, helium-filled balloon about one meter in diameter, representing an animal. The CNES (Centre National d'Études Spatiales) attributed the misidentification to specific observation conditions like sunset, light wind, and urban environment. Juncosa concludes that such misidentifications are common and are sometimes exploited for publicity, citing a TPS advertisement as a prime example of carefully crafted misdirection.

She further dissects the TPS advertisement, noting how a seemingly tranquil domestic scene, a character waking up in a semi-conscious state (described as 'sophroliminal state'), and the visual elements (like the green color associated with extraterrestrials, the technician installing a satellite dish, and the garden) contribute to the misinterpretation of the satellite dish's reflection as a flying saucer.

Juncosa also discusses the 'frozen' aspect of the family in the ad, suggesting that intense focus on television can immobilize viewers. The technician's explanation of the product's benefits, combined with the protagonist's limited view from the window, reinforces the idea of something strange happening. The article concludes that the witness is well-intentioned but reconstructs the narrative, unable to accept the obvious explanation. The media's reaction is depicted as sensationalist, with police intervention and skepticism towards the witness, questioning the absence of ufologists in analyzing the situation.

"TOBOR, LE RETOUR" by Raoul Robé

Raoul Robé discusses the film "TOBOR, LE GRAND" (1954) and a reported sighting of a robot named TOBRO in the Paris region in January 1998. The witness described TOBRO as dark, metallic, artificial, and lacking conscience. Robé notes the existence of 'portrait robots' for both TOBOR (1954) and TOBRO (1998). He points out that the robot delivers a doomsday message, warning of an impending catastrophe due to an asteroid, a theme also explored in films like "Meteor," "Asteroid," "Deep Impact," and "Armageddon." Renaud Leclei discovered similarities between the drawing of the phenomenon and a helicopter with projector panels from the film "Independence Day." The drawing depicts luminous panels and dark areas, similar to those seen in the film.

Robé further analyzes the witness's drawing, which includes luminous panels and dark areas, comparing them to the helicopter in "Independence Day." He mentions that the colors of the luminous rays (green, red, and yellow) correspond to aerial signaling. Despite contacting nearby airfields and confirming the presence of BELL 47 helicopters, the possibility of them being the observed object could not be confirmed. The immense spaceship from "Independence Day" also features a round central structure and beams similar to those seen in the film. Robé concludes by questioning the influence of science fiction on witnesses' minds and suggests that many UFO reports might be products of our own brains, rather than genuine encounters, especially when trying to categorize them as 'RR4' (a type of encounter).

Robé expresses his belief that the UFO phenomenon is complex enough without being further polluted by assertions drawn from human imagination. He dismisses the TOBOR case as a "false trail" that diverts research from the real problem.

"JUSQU'AUX CONFINS DE L'ABSURDE ... SUIVEZ LE GUIDE !" by Eric Maillot

Eric Maillot revisits a 1992 publication titled "LES CAHIERS DE COURS, Publication d'ECOL N°1," from Lorraine Ufologie. He highlights two editorials and a report on vigils conducted by the ECOL group, which reportedly had around 80 members, though the CNEGU doubts this number due to lack of proof. Maillot presents a table summarizing vigil data, including dates, times, number of observed objects (satellites, planes, helicopters, etc.), number of attendees, and weather conditions. The mention of 'HUM' indicates a humanoid observation on the ground.

Maillot draws several 'ufological lessons' from this data. He notes that satellites and aircraft are better seen in cloudy weather. He questions the synchronized 'vacations' of satellites and the Haye Forest humanoid. He also observes an unusual number of helicopter sightings and suggests that military personnel might have been searching for the humanoid. The data also points to a possible micro-climate in the Haye Forest and the absence of saucer nests, leading to speculation about antigravity or levitation capabilities.

Maillot then compares data from the 42nd CNEGU session, where Robert Fischer reported a fiery silhouette in the Haye Forest on May 25, 1992, with the date mentioned in the "GUIDE" publication. He notes Fischer's later statement to the press that he had never observed anything peculiar, contrasting with the flamboyant humanoids often reported in the Haye Forest. Maillot suggests Fischer might have fallen victim to 'missing time' and reconstructed memories, implying alien manipulation. He encourages readers to critically assess information from Robert Fischer and associated organizations.

Interview with Robert Fischer

In an interview with "Le Journal de Saône-et-Loire," Robert Fischer, an independent ufologist, discusses his lifelong passion for the inexplicable, particularly UFOs. He defines UFOs as objects that defy the laws of physics and aeronautics, stating that science has much to learn. Fischer mentions his involvement with the "Groupe Privé Ufologique Nancéen" and his extensive research, including translating English and American ufological texts for French-speaking audiences via the internet. He advises that official channels like the gendarmerie and SERPA are responsible for collecting UFO testimonies, but ufological associations are also becoming important points of contact. Fischer emphasizes that ufology's role is to establish the existence of inexplicable phenomena, citing cases like Roswell and recent sightings in the Paris region as evidence that something significant is occurring.

The interview also lists several ufological associations in the Saône-et-Loire region, including ALEPL, SECRET, SCEAU, and SEAPAN.

Cartoon

A cartoon depicts aliens abducting a person and their car, with dialogue suggesting the car theft is a "sequence for my wife, chief." Another panel shows aliens telling someone, "YOU ARE NOT ON VACATION." The cartoon satirizes abduction scenarios.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue consistently explores the theme of misidentification in UFO sightings, attributing it to media influence, popular culture (especially science fiction films), and psychological factors. There's a critical stance towards sensationalism and a call for more rigorous analysis. The influence of science fiction on witness accounts is a recurring motif, particularly in the "TOBOR, LE RETOUR" article. The magazine also highlights the work of ufologists and organizations dedicated to investigating these phenomena, while simultaneously encouraging critical thinking and skepticism towards unsubstantiated claims. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious investigation, acknowledging the existence of unexplained phenomena but emphasizing the need to differentiate between genuine sightings and misinterpretations or fabrications.

This issue of the magazine focuses on the "L'OVNI ARDENNAIS DE 23h 38" (The Ardennes UFO of 11:38 PM) case, authored by Renaud Leclet and Eric Maillot. Published on March 6, 1999, the article critically analyzes a widely reported UFO sighting that occurred in the Ardennes region of France in July 1998. The investigation delves into witness testimonies, media coverage, and the methodologies employed by ufological organizations.

The Ardennais UFO Case: Initial Reports and Media Frenzy

The article begins by recounting how the authors learned about the UFO incident during their vacation and the subsequent media storm. They note that various media outlets, including "L'Union des Ardennes," FR3, A2, and TF1, rushed to cover the story, driven by a lack of other news during the holiday season. The authors express skepticism about the information disseminated by J-Luc Lemaire, a central figure in the case, describing it as "incoherent" and lacking verifiable details such as exact locations, azimuths, altitudes, and trajectories.

Investigation and Analysis of Evidence

Leclet and Maillot decided to investigate the site of the sighting in Floing, France, after a photo published in "Ici Paris" on September 29, 1998, provided an exact location. They went to Floing to verify if three visible "streetlights" in the photo were indeed the UFO. Upon arrival, they discovered these were merely flagpoles. Their observations in the area revealed significant air traffic, with 6 aircraft passing in 45 minutes, suggesting that the reported UFO might have been an aircraft.

They attempted to record sounds, noting the difficulty in distinguishing between aircraft and local vehicle noise, even late at night. Their investigation led them to obtain a video extract shown on TF1, which they analyzed during a CNEGU session. This analysis suggested that the "UFO" might have been an aircraft exhibiting flashing lights, consistent with navigation lights and anti-collision beacons.

Key Figures and Organizations Involved

Renaud Leclet was invited to a conference by J-Luc Lemaire in October 1998, which included a presentation on the Ardennais UFO. During this period, Leclet learned that J-Luc Lemaire was allegedly collaborating with military personnel who claimed the Ardennais UFO was a drone used for training exercises near Sissonne.

Further Investigations and Contradictions

Further investigation involved attempts to film aircraft with similar light patterns. Gilles Munsch and Raoul Robé contributed by filming airliners. Analysis of Jean-Claude's video revealed light frequencies varying between 28 and 32 frames per second. Gilles Munsch later reported filming an aircraft with flashing lights at intervals of 25 and 31 images, suggesting the "UFO" had moved to the Vosges region.

In October, Leclet learned that J-Luc Lemaire was allegedly told by "anonymously high-ranking military" that the Ardennais UFO was a drone used for training exercises near Sissonne, simulating terrain similar to Kosovo. However, inquiries with the military camp at Sissonne revealed it was closed in July and August, and information about drones was limited, with suggestions they might be based in Nevers.

Media Operations and Debunking Efforts

The article criticizes the media's role in amplifying the UFO story, particularly the VSD special issue from July 1998. It suggests that a "media operation" was initiated, leading millions to believe in the existence of an object that was merely a "phantasm" of Jean-Luc Lemaire. The authors highlight the incoherence and contradictions in press clippings reproduced in ufological journals and websites.

Analysis of Other UFO Cases

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to a critical analysis of various UFO cases presented in a VSD Hors Série issue from July 1998. Eric Maillot meticulously debunks several cases, including:

• Capitole (1952): Explained as a reflection of lights.
• Tokyo (1973): Explained as an inverted reflection of a streetlight.
• Canaries (1976): A missile launch presented as a radar-detected UFO.
• Roswell: The Mogul balloon explanation is dismissed in favor of a secret project known since 1947, ignoring previous research.
• Tananarive (1954): A distant and difficult-to-verify case.
• Valensole: An explanation exists but was not verified, possibly involving a helicopter.
• Trans en Provence: The object reportedly had three landing legs instead of four.

Maillot also critiques the explanations provided for other cases, such as the "Amrante" case, where plant samples were deemed unusable due to a flawed collection method. He questions the credibility of pilots and scientists who claim infallibility regarding UFOs.

Specific Case Critiques

The article systematically dissects several other cases cited by ufologists:

• Air France Flight (1994): Witness accounts of a "ballon sonde" or "Guppy" are contrasted with radar data, suggesting misidentification.
• Belgian F16 Radar Echoes: The pilot's inability to identify a refinery flare is presented as proof of infallibility, while thermal inversion and "false echoes" are ignored.
• Michigan Atmospheric Re-entry (1984): A pilot's experience is presented as a turning point towards belief in E.T.
• Gaillac Atmospheric Re-entry (1990): Identified as a phenomenon explained by SEPRA/CNES.
• Japanese Observation (1986): Two aircraft observed a large object, but it's presented as a UFO sighting.
• Thomas Mantell: A case involving a balloon probe.
• Chaumont Mirage IV Sighting: Questioned whether it was a mirage.
• Melun-Villaroche (1995): A description of a military aircraft is presented as a potential UFO.
• Téhéran (1976): A case involving astronomical misidentification and aircraft takeoffs.
• Tours Case (Poitiers): Attributed to a meteor sighting and an active meteor swarm.
• Michel Asseline Sighting: Questioned whether a pilot can never err in judgment, referencing a previous aircraft crash.
• Montélimar (1988): A pilot sees a UFO, but another pilot identifies it as an airplane.

Conclusion on the Ardennais UFO

The authors conclude that the video that triggered many testimonies was merely of an aircraft, not a UFO or drone, contrary to J-Luc Lemaire's claims. They argue that a single individual was able to create the narrative of a unique Ardennais UFO from hundreds of aircraft sightings. They also dismiss associated cases, like the "singing UFO" of Mike Brandt, as part of an artificial mini-wave.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine's stance is clearly critical and skeptical towards sensationalized UFO reports and the methods used by some ufological organizations and the media. The recurring themes include:

• Media Manipulation: How the press can mislead the public with "authority arguments" and "false scientific evidence."
• Misidentification: The frequent misinterpretation of ordinary aerial phenomena (aircraft, balloons, meteors) as UFOs.
• Lack of Verifiability: Emphasis on the difficulty of verifying distant or poorly documented cases.
• Critique of Ufological Methods: Questioning the rigor and objectivity of certain UFO investigations and the reliance on unverified testimonies.
• The "Pilot Infallibility" Myth: Challenging the notion that pilots are incapable of misidentifying objects.

The editorial stance is one of debunking and promoting a rational, evidence-based approach to understanding aerial phenomena, contrasting it with what they perceive as sensationalism and unfounded speculation in the UFO field.

This issue of VSD, identified as a 'Hors Série' (Special Issue), dated October 18, 1998, focuses on the intersection of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and military helicopter operations, particularly night flights. The content is primarily in French.

Early UFO Observations and Comparisons

The issue begins by referencing early space-related observations, including photos from Gemini 12 in 1965 showing unidentified space debris and a description of the Apollo 13 LEM's reflective surfaces on the Moon in April 1970. It then presents a series of UFO sightings, often comparing them to helicopter characteristics. For instance, a case from Voreppe notes that SEPRA did not identify an object on video, while another from Metz suggests a gendarme identified an object as the moon. The Haynesville, Louisiana case from 1966 is cited as an example of misidentification, where the luminosity of UFOs was equated to the moon's.

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to a detailed article by Renaud Leclet titled "EVOLUTION DU VOL DE NUIT DANS L'A.L.A.T. ET SIMILITUDES AVEC LES OBSERVATIONS EN L'UFOLOGIE?" (Evolution of Night Flight in ALAT and Similarities with UFOology Observations?).

History of Helicopters in French Military Service

Leclet's article traces the history of helicopters in French military aviation (ALAT - Aviation Légère de l'Armée de Terre). It begins with the first French helicopter flight in 1907 and details the adoption of various models by the French army, including Hiller 360s, Bell 47s, and Sikorsky H-19s and H-34s, starting from the 1950s. The article highlights their deployment during the Indochina and Algerian Wars, noting the initial skepticism about their effectiveness and the subsequent development of pilot training programs.

Night Flight Operations

The article extensively discusses the development and execution of night flight operations for ALAT. It explains that the need for night operations arose early, particularly for medical evacuations and mission returns during the Algerian War. The evolution from artisanal night flying methods to more standardized procedures is described. By 1976, a dedicated night experimentation cell was established. The article details the types of missions undertaken at night, including reconnaissance, resupply, troop insertion/extraction, and sanitary evacuations. It emphasizes the importance of rigorous training, crew cohesion, and meticulous preparation for night missions, noting that safety is paramount.

Similarities Between Helicopter Equipment and UFO Sightings

Leclet draws parallels between helicopter equipment and reported UFO characteristics. For example, the use of landing lights and searchlights on helicopters is compared to the luminous beams and lights reported by UFO witnesses. The article lists numerous specific UFO sightings from the 1950s to the 1990s, often describing their shape (disk, cigar, sphere, dome, saucer), color, luminosity, and behavior (hovering, vertical ascent/descent, scanning the ground). These descriptions are implicitly or explicitly contrasted with the capabilities and appearance of military helicopters.

Training and Mission Preparation

Detailed sections cover the training of ALAT personnel for night operations, including collective instruction for formation flying and individual instruction focusing on instrument flying, formation keeping, and navigation. The preparation for missions involves reconnaissance of landing zones, decision-making regarding flight cancellation, and coordination with air traffic control. The article also touches upon the use of balisage (marking landing zones) and the importance of weather conditions, noting that winter nights can sometimes be more 'flyable' than days.

Specific UFO Sightings and Characteristics

The magazine provides a chronological list of presumed UFO observations, noting details such as:

• 1952-1954: Sightings of grey objects with square windows, luminous circles, and cigar-shaped craft.
• 1954: A wave of sightings in September-October-November, with UFOs landing vertically and humanoid figures observed.
• 1950s-1970s: Numerous reports of luminous objects, spheres, disks, and ovoids, often described with hublights, beams, and emitting noises.
• 1970s-1980s: Sightings of V-shaped formations, objects with domes and jets of light, and rapid blue-green spheres.

Navigation and Case Studies

The article discusses navigation techniques for night flights, emphasizing the use of landmarks like rivers and the impact of moonlight or snow cover on visibility. It also includes specific case studies, such as an object following a train near Rennes in 1968, and another near Valensole in 1980.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes are the comparison between military helicopter capabilities and reported UFO phenomena, the technical aspects and evolution of night flight in military aviation, and the cataloging of historical UFO sightings. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious investigation, presenting data and observations in a comparative and analytical manner, without necessarily endorsing the extraterrestrial hypothesis but exploring the similarities and potential overlaps between known aerial technology and unexplained aerial phenomena.

This issue of OVNI magazine, dated September 1998, focuses on the intersection of ufology and mythology, alongside practical aspects of aviation and detailed case studies. The cover story, "Ufologie ou mythologie ? Là est la question..." by Ghislain Dominé, delves into whether UFO phenomena are more akin to modern myths than objective reality. The magazine also provides technical information on night flight conditions and helicopter operations, as well as an in-depth investigation into a specific sighting.

Approche et Atterrissage sur Zone Balisée

This section describes the procedures for approaching and landing in a designated area, emphasizing communication between the patrol leader and the ground crew, verification of authentication signals, and the tactical positioning of the aircraft and troops during landing. It highlights the importance of minimizing risks and facilitating the assembly of the combat group.

Similitude entre les Atterrissages d'OVNI et les Hélicoptères

This section presents a series of historical UFO sightings that bear striking resemblances to helicopter operations. Examples include an object making signals on the ground, a cigar-shaped craft on skis taking off with a whistling sound, and a craft with visible silhouettes through its windows. Other incidents describe discoid objects with headlights and luminous objects mimicking flashlight movements, suggesting potential misidentifications of conventional aircraft.

Exemple de Type de Manœuvres

This section outlines military maneuvers, including orders for a raid by an escadron of the Neme Régiment from April 28 to May 2, 1975, and intelligence regarding potential offensive actions by red forces east of the Rhine, suggesting a move south of Strasbourg. It also details a mission involving the recovery of supplies and explosives, and a planned helicopter extraction that was later canceled.

Vol de Nuit et Éclairement Nocturne

This article discusses the factors influencing night flight conditions, with the moon being the primary source of nocturnal illumination. It introduces a system of "night levels" (1 to 5) to measure ambient light, crucial for pilot training. The text also details the lunar cycle and its impact on night visibility, outlining favorable flight times during different lunar phases (new moon, first quarter, full moon, last quarter, and transition phase).

Cycle d'Éclairement Lunaire

This section elaborates on the lunar cycle and its effect on night illumination. It describes the phases of the moon: new moon (8 days, low illumination), first quarter (4 days, moderate illumination), full moon (6 days, high illumination), last quarter (5 days, decreasing illumination), and a transition phase (7 days). It also provides specific recommendations for favorable flight times during each phase, considering the moon's altitude and position.

Le Bruit des Hélicoptères

This brief section touches upon the issue of helicopter noise, citing the Dauphin SA-360 as an example, with noise levels of 80 to 90 PNdB at different altitudes. It emphasizes that noise is a critical concern for manufacturers, especially for helicopters operating in densely populated areas or urban environments.

Conclusion

The concluding section acknowledges that the list of UFO reports is not exhaustive and highlights the numerous similarities between night helicopter flights and alleged "flying saucers." It notes that few UFO observations have been definitively explained, citing two cases where helicopters were mistaken for UFOs: one involving smugglers' helicopters in Fleury d'Aude and another where a Puma helicopter was identified as a UFO in Le Luc.

Les Hélicoptères Français Détenus par l'A.L.A.T.

This list details French helicopters operated by the Army Light Aviation (ALAT), including their model names, first flight dates, and service entry dates where applicable. Models include the SO-1221 Djinn, Alouette II, Alouette III, Super Frelon, Dauphin, Gazelle, and Puma/Super Puma.

Sources Aéronautiques Utilisées

A comprehensive list of aeronautical sources used in the magazine's research is provided, including books, directories, and encyclopedias on helicopters, military aircraft, and aviation history.

Sources Ufologiques Utilisées

This section lists the ufological sources consulted, categorized into Revues (magazines), Livres (books), and Divers (miscellaneous data). It includes specific issues of LDLN, OVNI présence, various books on UFOs and extraterrestrials, and databases from F Marie and Eric Maillot.

Ufologie ou Mythologie ? Là est la question...

Ghislain Dominé's article argues that UFO phenomena can be viewed as modern myths. He defines a myth as an oral narrative featuring superhuman or imaginary characters, reflecting a society's anxieties and beliefs. Dominé suggests that UFO accounts, with their often extraordinary descriptions, align with this definition. He posits that while the initial observation of a UFO might be a real celestial phenomenon, its interpretation and transmission can transform it into a myth. He concludes by advocating for a more mythologically-oriented approach to ufology, one that seeks to understand how UFO explanations become ingrained in popular consciousness, even when they might be simple misidentifications.

Enquête à Prauthoy (Haute-Marne)

This detailed investigation report by Gilles MUNSCH and Christine ZWYGART chronicles their inquiry into a UFO sighting in Prauthoy on August 10, 1998. The report includes a timeline of events, starting with a call from a local journalist. The sighting involved a triangle-shaped object with a loud, deep noise, observed for a short duration. Ground traces were found, and samples were taken by the gendarmerie. The investigators interviewed witnesses, the landowner, and local authorities, noting the skepticism of some and the efforts to secure the site. The report also mentions potential links to recent observations in the Ardennes and discusses the possibility of archaeological remains being mistaken for UFO traces due to drought conditions.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the nature of UFO phenomena, exploring whether they are misidentifications of conventional aircraft (particularly helicopters), genuine extraterrestrial craft, or a form of modern mythology. The magazine appears to adopt a stance of open inquiry, presenting various cases and analyses while acknowledging the challenges in definitively explaining many sightings. There is a clear interest in the historical context of UFO reports and their potential parallels with mythological narratives. The detailed investigations, such as the one in Prauthoy, suggest a commitment to rigorous, albeit sometimes inconclusive, research. The inclusion of technical aviation information, like night flight conditions and helicopter types, indicates an effort to ground the discussion in factual, operational realities, potentially to differentiate them from purely speculative theories.

This issue of "Le Journal de la Haute-Marne" from August 16, 1998, titled "Prauthoy après les Ardennes : info ou intox autour d'un OVNI ?", investigates a mysterious event that occurred in Prauthoy, France. The report details witness testimonies, the discovery of unusual ground traces, and the subsequent investigation by local authorities and an OVNI expert.

The Prauthoy Incident

The main focus is on an alleged OVNI sighting and the discovery of ground traces in Prauthoy on the night of August 10-11, 1998. Witnesses, including Josette Lanceleve, Jeanne Roger, Paulette Mauffré, and Lucette M..., reported seeing a low-flying, triangular craft with lights and hearing an unusual, loud noise, described as a "vrombissement" (rumble).

Following the sighting, Lucette Mauffré discovered unusual traces in her field, described as straight lines and a triangle, with grass that was crushed, yellowed, or reddened over a 25-meter area. A pear tree near the trace was found to be desiccated. The traces were also visible on a neighboring field.

Investigation and Expert Analysis

The Gendarmerie was alerted, and along with the firefighters from Chaumont (equipped with radioactivity detection gear) and Langres, secured the site. Initial radioactivity measurements were negative. The Gendarmerie launched an investigation, collecting samples for potential expert analysis.

Jean-Luc Lemaire, head of the OVNI France study center, visited the site. After examining the area and taking soil and leaf samples, Lemaire expressed skepticism. He stated that he did not believe there was a connection between the auditory phenomena reported by some residents and the ground traces. He suggested that the visual sightings might be explained by military aircraft conducting reconnaissance, a possibility that could be confirmed by military authorities if not for "secret défense." Regarding the traces, Lemaire proposed they could be remnants of old house foundations, a former pond, or even older structures whose presence was revealed by the dry soil conditions. He noted that a pear tree was located directly over one of the traces, making an actual landing unlikely.

Lemaire also mentioned that the case was being communicated to SEPRA, a French official agency for space studies.

Witness Testimonies and Contradictions

Testimonies were varied. Some witnesses described a triangular craft, while others mentioned a "navette" (shuttle). The direction of the phenomenon was also debated, with one report suggesting North-South instead of the expected East-West.

Lucette M... reported feeling a physical disturbance on the evening she discovered the traces, which intensified during an overnight storm. Her mother, however, suggested that too much importance was being given to the event.

Related Incidents and Media Context

The article draws parallels with a similar incident reported in the Ardennes on the same night, where an OVNI was allegedly observed by 500 people. This event involved a triangular shape and luminous beams. Another previous incident in Haute-Marne on August 1, 1996, involved sightings of an "orange ball" followed by a luminous trail.

The Prauthoy case occurred in a context of heightened media interest, partly due to the Ardennes sighting and a special issue of the magazine VSD. The article notes that the case did not seem to advance knowledge on unidentified phenomena.

Official and Scientific Involvement

The Gendarmerie of the Ardennes was reportedly given precise instructions. The Captain of the Gendarmerie in Langres and the Colonel of Gendarmerie in Chaumont also visited the site. A request was made to Air Traffic Control, but a response was pending.

The investigation was temporarily disrupted by the accidental death of Adjudant S..., but resumed with a new officer in charge. The SEPRA was expected to examine the case.

Conclusion

The provisional conclusion of the investigation was that it was difficult to definitively affirm anything about the phenomenon observed in Prauthoy. While the possibility of misidentification with an aircraft, particularly a Transall, was considered probable, no tangible evidence definitively supported it. Conversely, there was no solid evidence to support a "beyond normal" phenomenon. The ground traces were more likely explained as a resurgence of underground features, such as old stone walls, revealed by the soil conditions. The report emphasizes the need to distinguish between visual observations and the physical traces.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue highlights the recurring nature of OVNI reports in the region, drawing connections between the Prauthoy and Ardennes incidents. It also touches upon the challenges of ufological research, including potential misinterpretations, the influence of media attention, and the skepticism of experts like Jean-Luc Lemaire. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious investigation, presenting witness accounts and expert opinions while maintaining a degree of skepticism and emphasizing the need for verifiable evidence. The article implicitly questions the sensationalism surrounding such events, as suggested by the "info ou intox" (info or hoax) in the title.

This document, titled "Annexes," appears to be a compilation of newspaper articles and other related materials, likely from a publication focused on UFO phenomena. The content spans several pages, with page numbers indicating it is part of a larger work (e.g., "- 13/15 -", "- 14/15 -", "- 15/15 -", "- 1/8 -", "- 2/8 -", "- 3/8 -", "- 4/8 -", "- 5/8 -", "- 78 -", "- 79 -", "- 80 -", "- 81 -", "- 83 -", "- 84 -", "- 85 -", "- 86 -", "- 87 -"). The primary focus is on UFO sightings reported in the French press during August and September 1998, alongside a transcript of a radio debate concerning the Trans-en-Provence case and broader issues in ufology.

Articles de Journaux

The document begins by listing numerous newspaper articles categorized by publication and date, primarily from August 1998. These articles report on various UFO sightings across different French regions:

• Le Journal de la Haute-Marne reported a triangular UFO over the Ardennes (August 14), mentioned X-Files, featured an interview with a skeptical UFO specialist in Prauthoy (August 19), discussed the Prauthoy UFO with a question about explanations (August 21), announced the accidental death of an officer in Prauthoy (August 27), and analyzed UFOs with a rational passion (September 1).
• Haute-Marne Dimanche covered a UFO encounter in Prauthoy, questioning its authenticity (August 16).
• L'est Républicain noted a UFO in Haute-Marne (August 17).
• Le Républicain Lorrain reported a UFO over the Ardennes (August 14).
• La Liberté de l'Est mentioned a triangular UFO over the Ardennes (August 14) and suspicious traces and sounds from a flying object in Haute-Marne (August 16).
• L'Ardennais documented reports of UFOs including pilots' 'blind flights' (August 8), an unidentified object in Sedan (August 12), over 130 testimonies (August 13), testimonies from North to South (August 17), scientific rigor from Jean-Jacques Vélasco (August 20), and an Ardennes ufologist's belief in a military prototype (August 23).
• L'Est Eclair reported on a UFO and the 'fifth dimension' in the Ardennes, with the region being overflown by a UFO (August 14-15).
• Le Bien Public mentioned traces and sounds of a flying object in Haute-Marne (August 16) and an aerial phenomenon in Troyes described as 'boomerang-jumeaux' (July 22).
• Le Bien Public also reported a triangular UFO over the Ardennes (August 14) and similarities in a Haute-Marne UFO case (August 19), with unidentified flying objects in Côte d'Or (August 24) and curious phenomena observed in Côte d'Or (August 31).
• La Voix du Nord noted a UFO in the Ardennes (August 14-15) and in Haute-Marne (August 16-17).
• La Nouvelle République (Edition de Poitiers) posed the question 'UFO, are you there?' (August 17).
• Centre Presse asked 'A UFO in the sky?' (August 17).
• France Soir reported a mysterious triangle (August 14) and mysterious traces in a field (August 17). It also covered a family from Isère filming a flying saucer, with an incandescent sphere intriguing researchers (September 12).
• Le Figaro mentioned scientists deeming a UFO case in a cherry tree 'serious' (September 12-13).
• Le Parisien and Aujourd'hui en France reported on UFOs and inhabitants of Prauthoy (August 17).

Documents Internet

This section references UFOCOM (http:www.finart.be/UfocomHq/) and its 'Investigations' section, detailing observations of a triangular UFO in the Ardennes by over a hundred people, an ongoing investigation, a video from Sedan, and an analysis of that video. It notes that two affairs were often treated simultaneously and sometimes confused.

Observations Concomitantes

This section discusses the media's role in revealing and sometimes creating UFO testimonies. It lists specific observations that came to light following media coverage:

• August 10, 1998 (Longvic, 21): A man observed a luminous phenomenon with high altitude and rapid ascent, forming an isosceles triangle, disappearing quickly. It was described as having no sound. This case was mentioned in the press with an incorrect time.
• August 10, 1998 (Bligny-sur-Ouche, 21): A couple observed a luminous phenomenon for about five seconds, characterized as a 'superb Perseid'.
• August 13, 1998 (Fragnes, 71): A man observed a phenomenon moving rapidly from south to north, with three non-blinking lights in an isosceles triangle formation. This case was also mentioned in the press with directional errors and led to other testimonies, some reporting a low-altitude phenomenon.

Jeux Ufologique: Menez l'Enquete

A comic strip illustrates a humorous take on a UFO investigation. It depicts a woman, Madame Myopsky, seeing a flying saucer with three small beings in red boots on her roof. Her husband, Maurice, is called to see, but from the window, he sees nothing. The explanation provided is that Madame Myopsky is myopic, and what she saw were reflections of the setting sun and pigeons pecking at a cache-cheminée.

Trans...cription d'un Débat Radio...cacophonique

This section is a transcript of a radio debate that took place on January 28, 1998, hosted by "le Mouv'" and moderated by Emmanuel Gouache. The participants included P. Lagrange, J-J Velasco, M. Bounias, and Eric Maillot (EMT), with additional input from a female voice (F) and Pierre Lagrange (PL).

The debate initially touches upon the book by Philippe Corso on Roswell, with Pierre Lagrange calling it a "monumental fraud." The discussion then shifts to the Trans-en-Provence case.

• Trans-en-Provence Case: Eric Maillot recounts the case of Renato Niccolai observing a disc-shaped object landing near his home on January 8, 1981. Traces were found, and the alfalfa seemed biologically modified. J-J Velasco stated the investigation phase was over, but the case remained unexplained. Professor Bounias, who analyzed samples for CNES, confirmed significant changes in the alfalfa's molecular functioning, including chlorophyll, amino acids, and carotenoids, which were not attributable to chance and varied with distance from the trace.

• Debate on Ufology: The participants discuss the nature of ufology, with J-J Velasco stating it's not a science but a forum for ideas, often devolving into ideological disputes between believers and skeptics. Eric Maillot agrees, emphasizing the need to avoid placing the debate at the level of belief and to focus on the facts of cases like Trans-en-Provence. Pierre Lagrange criticizes the lack of politeness and constructive dialogue, suggesting that the division between skeptics and believers is artificial and benefits media sensationalism. He advocates for a more methodical and respectful approach.

• Scientific vs. Amateur Ufology: Michel Figuet, a member of SERPAN, presents a counter-report on Trans-en-Provence, questioning the scientific data provided by some researchers. He points out alleged errors in dating sample collections. The debate touches on the role of amateur investigators and the need for scientific rigor. M. Bounias expresses skepticism about the future of ufology, given that UFOs are by definition unknown objects, but acknowledges that scientific theories also have undefined aspects. J-J Velasco reiterates that ufology is not a science and that progress is hindered by ideological battles rather than data-driven analysis.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes are the reporting of UFO sightings in the French press, the scientific investigation of these phenomena, and the often-contentious debates surrounding ufology. The document highlights a tension between media sensationalism and scientific inquiry, as well as the challenges of establishing a common ground for discussion among scientists, skeptics, believers, and amateur investigators. The editorial stance appears to be one of documenting reported events and presenting different perspectives on their interpretation, while also implicitly questioning the scientific validity of some claims and the conduct of some debates within the ufology community.

This issue of 'Revue de Presse' presents a collection of articles and correspondences primarily focused on UFO sightings, extraterrestrial theories, and the media's role in discussing these topics. The content spans a period in late 1998 and early 1999, with a strong emphasis on French reports and debates.

Discussion and Debate

The issue opens with a transcript of a discussion involving EG, EMT, and PL, likely from a radio program. The conversation reveals a disagreement about the conduct of a debate, with EMT accusing PL of personal attacks and derailing the discussion on the 'Trans' case and UFOs. PL defends his actions, suggesting that EMT's style is overly aggressive and that the focus should be on scientific discussion rather than challenges. The exchange highlights the tension between different approaches to discussing controversial subjects.

Following this, a personal account from the perspective of the author (likely EMT or someone aligned with that viewpoint) details a subsequent phone conversation with PL. The author expresses a feeling that PL sabotaged the previous discussion by shifting it to personal polemics. PL counters that the show's focus was on UFOs, not solely 'Trans,' and that science isn't built on challenges. He suggests the author publish scientific findings in ufology. The author recounts asking PL about his criticism and the involvement of CNEGU and SERPAN, with PL naming individuals who had criticized the author's 'corrosive' style. The author questions if PL's remarks were quasi-defamatory, which PL denies.

Another section features a letter from Eric Maillot to Pierre, referencing a radio emission ('LE MOUV') and a text intended for 'Mystères de l'Est.' Maillot seeks feedback on his conversation with PL and asks for an analysis of the debate's sociological aspects. He also requests a list of any insults or injuries in his texts, offering to publicly acknowledge any unjustified outbursts. Maillot also inquires about PL's motivations for publishing texts on 'RR3 mondiales' in 'SCIENCE et VIE JUNIOR' and asks about PL's criteria for discussing UFO cases.

Reported Sightings and Phenomena

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to reporting various luminous aerial phenomena observed in France:

• Wahagnies, Hautmont, Coutiches: Several readers reported seeing luminous shapes, described as round and silent, in the sky before Christmas. In Wahagnies, a family observed luminous shapes moving in a circle at high speed. In Hautmont, three luminous shapes were seen in the clouds, describing circles. In Coutiches, two immobile shapes and a third making a high-speed circle were observed.
• Seclin: M. L. reported seeing five luminous objects in a circle without sound on December 23rd, 1998. These objects had the appearance of clear clouds and moved in a circular trajectory, with light beams emanating from them.
• Flandre Maritime: Reports of luminous, round, and silent shapes in the sky are mentioned, with some witnesses describing them as rotating or moving rapidly.
• West-Cappel: An inhabitant reported seeing three unidentified flying objects that ascended, descended, and rotated rapidly.
• Epinal: Several people, including a Météo France official, reported a mysterious luminous object over Epinal on December 27th, 1998. Described as a white-orange drop-shaped ball with a blue trail, it moved rapidly and emitted an intense flash.

Explanations and Skepticism

Several articles attempt to provide explanations for these sightings:

• Projectors and Reflections: One reader suggests that phenomena observed around commercial centers could be explained by professional projectors (DCA type) and reflections on cloud cover.
• Sky Tracers: Another explanation offered is the use of 'sky tracers,' objects projecting light and geometric shapes for commercial animation purposes.
• Voreppe, Isère: The 'OVNI' filmed in Voreppe was identified by the CNES (Centre national d'études spatiales) as a dark-colored balloon filled with helium, approximately one meter in diameter, representing an animal. The investigation, conducted by SEPRA (Service d'expertise des phénomènes de rentrée atmosphérique) and local gendarmes, concluded that specific observation conditions (setting sun, light wind, urban environment) contributed to the misidentification.
• Epinal: Expert Didier Mathieu suggests that the trajectories of the luminous objects observed over Epinal could correspond to those of spy satellites or the new international space station. He notes that the fixed luminosity and proximity to the ground align with low-orbit satellites. The observed trails could be due to ocular persistence or aircraft headlights, but military satellites are considered the most likely explanation.

Extraterrestrial Theories and Controversies

• Joe Firmage: The issue features a profile of Joe Firmage, a young tech entrepreneur who quit his job to promote the theory that extraterrestrials are the source of recent technological advancements. He claims that materials recovered from the Roswell crash in 1947 provided the basis for current technological developments and that extraterrestrials have been guiding humanity's progress for millennia.
• Roswell: Firmage's claims are linked to the Roswell incident, with mentions of alleged documents from President Truman and correspondence between Einstein and Oppenheimer regarding extraterrestrial matters.
• Nayah and the Raelians: Singer Nayah, chosen to represent France at Eurovision, is reported to have been a member of the Raëlian sect, which believes in extraterrestrial origins of life and anticipates their return in 2025.
• Energie Universelle et Humaine: An article mentions a sect predicting the end of the world, 'Energie Universelle et Humaine,' which held a meeting in Geneva despite the arrest of its founder in Belgium for fraud and illegal medical practice.

Media Coverage and References

The magazine includes extensive lists of newspaper articles from various French publications (L'Ardennais, La Liberté de l'Est, Le Bien Public, France Soir, etc.) that reported on UFO sightings and related topics around August 1998 and later. This highlights the significant media attention given to these phenomena at the time.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the reporting of unexplained aerial phenomena, the scientific and skeptical analysis of such sightings, and the media's role in disseminating and debating these topics. There's a clear tension between those who report extraordinary claims (like Joe Firmage) and those who seek rational, often mundane, explanations (like the CNES and experts like Didier Mathieu). The editorial stance appears to be one of presenting a range of viewpoints, from eyewitness accounts and speculative theories to scientific investigations and debunking efforts, while also critiquing the way media discussions on these subjects are conducted.

This issue of "Revue de Presse" from "L'Est Eclair" dated Tuesday, February 23, 1999, focuses on astronomical phenomena and UFO sightings, with a cover headline "D'étranges lumières aperçues dans le ciel aubois" (Strange lights seen in the Aube sky).

Article: D'étranges lumières aperçues dans le ciel aubois

This article reports on numerous sightings of two bright, stationary points of light in the western sky of the Aube department on the evening of February 22, 1999. Residents from various towns, including Troyes, Pont-Sainte-Marie, and Sainte-Savine, called the gendarmerie, police, and the newspaper to report these mysterious lights. Witnesses described them as looking like car headlights, very bright, and immobile. Some reported seeing them get closer together. The phenomenon was also reportedly observed the previous evening.

The article provides an astronomical explanation, attributing the lights to a conjunction of the planets Venus and Jupiter. A local police officer and amateur astronomer explained that these two planets currently appear close to each other in the sky, illuminated by the sun, making them clearly visible. Venus was described as the brighter of the two and to the right, while Jupiter was to the left. The phenomenon was expected to repeat the following evening with the positions of Venus and Jupiter reversed. The mystery is thus resolved, with the lights being celestial bodies rather than extraterrestrial craft.

Article: Une rencontre spatiale qui ne passe pas inaperçue

This article, dated Thursday, February 25, 1999, continues the theme of celestial events that intrigued the public. It describes a "spatial encounter" where planets met, specifically Venus visiting Jupiter. The event was observed through telescopes, with one witness describing it as a "magical observation" and the first time they had seen something like it. The article notes that while the planets are millions of kilometers apart, their alignment created a striking visual effect.

It mentions that this conjunction was particularly clear and exceptional. The next such event is predicted for 2014. The article also highlights an upcoming total solar eclipse on August 11, which will be visible across a wide band in northern France.

Other Mentions and Articles

Un OVNI aperçu par des milliers d'Australiens

This section reports on an unidentified flying object (UFO) sighted by thousands of people on the east coast of Australia. The Australian National Space Centre received numerous calls, with over 10% of the population reportedly seeing the object. The object, described as metallic, traversed the sky for about ten minutes before exploding about 100 meters offshore. Astronomers had not yet provided an explanation.

L'explosion élucidée ?

This piece revisits the 1908 Tunguska event, a massive explosion in Siberia. While the common explanation is the impact of an asteroid, no extraterrestrial rock fragments were found. A Russian scientist, Vladimir Setsov, proposed a new explanation based on mathematical modeling: the asteroid did not hit the ground but exploded in the atmosphere at an altitude of about ten kilometers. The resulting shockwave and heat would have caused the devastation, and the object's material would have been vaporized, leaving no debris.

Avion hypersonique

This short section mentions NASA's project for a hypersonic aircraft, the Hyper-X. A quarter-scale model of the rear fuselage was presented, with wind tunnel tests planned for the following year. The aircraft is designed to fly at speeds between Mach 5 and Mach 10 (approximately 8,000 km/h) using hydrogen. The article expresses uncertainty about whether this project will ever see the light of day.

Mais aussi ...

This section compiles brief mentions of UFO-related news from other publications:

• "Le Bien Public" (April 28, 1999)
• "Le Nouvel Observateur" (October 26-November 6, 1998)
• "Le Journal de Saône et Loire" (August 15, 1998)

UN OVNI DANS LE CIEL CHALONNAIS ?

This article details a sighting by Bernard Moreau, a technician from Fragnes, who reported seeing three lights moving in formation in the sky near Chalon. He described them as moving at high speed without any noise. His observation is compared to a previous sighting reported in the "Ardennes" region, suggesting a possible recurring phenomenon.

À St-Symphorien-de-Marmagne aussi

Two adolescents in Saint-Symphorien-de-Marmagne reported observing a luminous object on the night of August 10-11. They described it as larger than a football, moving silently and leaving a smoke trail. Similar observations were reported in Blanzy.

Article: L'OVNI et ses satellites

This section discusses the increase in UFO observations during the autumn, attributing it partly to media attention. It highlights a case reported in "La Liberté de l'Est" (September 20, 1998) concerning an object sighted near Le Havre and Honfleur. The object was described as a luminous disc with three points of light, moving slowly. It was observed by police, gendarmes, and the port captaincy. Airports of Paris and the air base of Taverny were contacted but found no corresponding flight plan. Astronomers suggested the object resembled the planet Jupiter.

Another report from "Havre Libre Dimanche" (September 20, 1998) also discusses a strange phenomenon in the Baie de Seine, questioning if it was a UFO or Jupiter. It mentions a visit to SEITA and a three-masted ship. The article notes that while some witnesses reported seeing a rectangle, astronomers suggested it was Jupiter due to its appearance and the positions of its satellites.

Un OVNI repéré près du Havre

This article details the sighting near Le Havre and Honfleur on Friday night. The object was described as cylindrical with two small luminous points on one side and one on the other. It moved slowly and was observed by multiple authorities. The air base at Taverny confirmed no aircraft traffic that could explain the phenomenon, which lasted for a significant part of the night.

Un rectangle à 50 m au-dessus du sol

Thierry Garnier, president of the Haut-Normandie astronomical circle, suggested the phenomenon was not easily explained. He mentioned previous sightings of luminous balls and a rectangular object observed at 50 meters above the ground, moving silently.

Boules lumineuses

Another incident describes a luminous ball approaching a building in Varenne, observed by two witnesses. One witness described it as a flying saucer emitting a phosphorescent halo. In Fécamp, a white luminous object was seen, which could not be explained as a typical aircraft or street light.

Article: DANS LA NUIT DE VENDREDI A SAMEDI

This article from "Havre Libre Dimanche" (September 20, 1998) reiterates the UFO sighting above Le Havre. The object was described as cylindrical with two white lights on the left and one on the right. Authorities were alerted, but no conventional explanation was found. The object moved slowly across the sky. The article also mentions a rectangular object seen 50 meters above the ground and luminous balls observed in previous months.

Article: Décès du professeur Maubeuge

This article, from "L'Est Républicain" dated January 27, 1999, announces the death of Professor Pierre Louis Maubeuge. He is remembered as a "father of Lorraine petroleum" and a scientist who contributed significantly to geology and published extensively. The article notes his interest in UFO phenomena, stating he was not a ufologist but a curious scientist who conducted investigations with the gendarmerie and army. He was impressed by the Revigny-sur-Ormain photo case and gave conferences on the subject. He corresponded with UFO associations and shared part of his archives, which were to be preserved by the Academy of Sciences of Nancy.

L'Affaire UMMO : Sectes, Soucoupes, Sexe et Services Secrets

This section, by Manuel Carballal, translated from "Samizdat - Hiver 1997", discusses the UMMO case. The author recounts his visits to Aluche and San José de Valderas in Spain, places associated with UMMO sightings. He describes his attempts to find witnesses and the difficulty in obtaining credible accounts, noting that many people referred to books written on the subject as proof of authenticity. The article mentions the widespread impact of the UMMO case, with numerous books, conferences, and even a film adaptation. It highlights the challenge of finding reliable witnesses for mass sightings and mentions the UMMO emblem, which predated the supposed arrival of the Ummites on Earth.

Le plus universel des cas espagnols

This part of the UMMO article discusses the case's significant impact on Spanish ufology. It mentions various books by Antonio Ribera and others that popularized the UMMO phenomenon internationally. The article also touches upon the organization of UMMO symposiums and the involvement of scientists like Jean-Pierre Petit. It notes the creation of UMMO fan clubs worldwide and the adaptation of the UMMO story into various media, including films and documentaries.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, astronomical phenomena, and the scientific investigation of unexplained events. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious inquiry, presenting witness accounts alongside scientific explanations and acknowledging the public's fascination with the unknown. There is an emphasis on distinguishing between genuine astronomical events and potential misidentifications, while also acknowledging the existence of unexplained phenomena and the importance of scientific curiosity, as exemplified by the tribute to Professor Maubeuge.

This issue of UMMO, presented in French, delves deeply into the complex and enduring UMMO affair, a significant case in Spanish ufology. The content spans multiple pages, detailing the evolution of the case, the key figures involved, and the eventual revelation of a large-scale hoax orchestrated by José Luis Jordan Peña. The magazine also touches upon related topics such as the broader societal impact of UFO phenomena, the involvement of secret services, and the tragic consequences of belief in extraterrestrial contact.

The UMMO Phenomenon and its Social Impact

The issue begins by discussing the widespread adoption of the UMMO symbol, UMMOELEWE )+(, which became a universal extraterrestrial symbol in the 1970s. It appeared in automatic writing sessions, telepathic messages, and even in descriptions of a supposed Ummite spaceship landing in Voronezh, Russia, which ultimately 'authenticated' the extraterrestrial origin of the UMMO spacecraft.

José Luis Jordan Peña: The Architect of the Hoax

The central figure in the UMMO affair is unequivocally José Luis Jordan Peña. He is presented as the primary witness in the Aluche case and a key investigator in the Valderas case. The article highlights his consistent presence throughout the affair and his role in forming the Association Eridani, initially positioning him as a skeptic within a group.

Oscar Rey Brea, an ufologist since 1945, became aware of the Ummite colony in Spain through scandalous declarations by Enrique Lopez Guerrero. However, ufologist Antonio Ribera, in a 1967 letter, speculated about 'humanoids' originating from a planet orbiting the red dwarf star Wolf-424, a theory that Rey Brea later doubted due to the star's advanced decay and low surface temperature.

Rey Brea's skepticism is further detailed through his research, including the analysis of photos from the Valderas case. His verdict was that the photos were a hoax, created using a tripod and a model saucer. This opinion was shared by other Spanish ufologists, such as Manuel Osuna, who also found the extraterrestrial claim of UMMO to be a challenge to his goodwill.

The Confession and Jordan Peña's Methods

In 1988, a significant revelation emerged when the father of José Juan Montejo recalled sharing a room in 1966 with José Luis Jordan Peña and Vicente Ortuño, the supposed sole witnesses to the Aluche UFO sighting. This discovery contradicted their previous claims of not knowing each other before the incident, casting doubt on the authenticity of the Aluche case and, by extension, the entire UMMO affair.

This led to a renewed investigation focusing on Jordan Peña as the potential sole instigator. His police file revealed he was born in Alicante in 1931 and had been detained for 'terrorist threats,' including the theft of a car. The police report also noted his connection to a cult called 'Les Amis des Frères d'UMMO.'

Jordan Peña's confession, made to the National Police's Cult Surveillance Group, detailed his creation of the UMMO myth. He admitted to adopting the persona of 'DEI-98' from the planet UMMO, inspired by the word 'ummo' (smoke) in Spanish. He used an electric vocal modifier to create a nasal, metallic voice and claimed his intention was to conduct a scientific study of sociology, not necessarily to create a credible extraterrestrial society.

He fabricated evidence, including imprints of a supposed Ummite landing in Madrid using a plastic mold, burning the surrounding ground, and spreading radioactive soil. He also created a plastic saucer model using paper plates and a hemisphere for the Valderas photos, which he developed himself. He employed a fast shutter speed and manipulated the emulsion grain to obscure the nylon thread holding the model.

Jordan Peña also invented fictitious witnesses, such as Antonio Pardo, to corroborate his stories. He sent letters to journalists like Antonio San Antonio and Rafael Farriols, sometimes confessing to the hoax, particularly after learning that the 'Edelweiss' sect was branding children with his UMMO emblem.

The Role of Secret Services

The issue highlights the potential involvement of Spanish secret services, specifically the SECED and CESID. It is suggested that these services monitored the UMMO case, possibly using the letters as a means to send coded messages that would not arouse suspicion if intercepted. The services were reportedly interested in the meetings organized by Fernando Sesma, which attracted a diverse group of individuals, including police, military, doctors, intellectuals, and even a secretary from the U.S. Embassy in Madrid.

According to sources, the SECED infiltrated a spy into the meetings at La Ballena Alegre and was aware of Jordan Peña's sexual proclivities, which may have led them to manipulate the UMMO affair rather than shut it down. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs also requested information on UMMO developments outside Spain.

The Darker Side of the UMMO Myth

Beyond the hoax, the UMMO myth had severe consequences. Dangerous cults like 'Edelweiss' and 'Les Amis des Frères d'UMMO' used the reports and photos to establish their own followings. Imitators emerged, posing as Uminites to engage in fraud or illegal activities. The issue also mentions the 'Suicides of Tarrassa,' where individuals died partly due to their belief in Ummite reports, and the psychological breakdown of Luis Anglada Font due to his obsession with UMMO.

Jordan Peña expressed regret for creating an 'immoral' experience that turned against him. The article also notes the creation of two new cults, Pirophos and a pseudo-Hindu group, motivated by sadomasochism, with Jordan Peña playing a role in their formation.

The Enduring Legacy and Editorial Stance

The issue concludes by emphasizing that the UMMO affair remains an unresolved mystery in Spanish ufology. It calls for researchers and disseminators to prevent the extraterrestrial myth from negatively impacting people's lives, regardless of its true nature. The article stresses that even if the Ummites were real, the existence of cults and suicides associated with the case should not be tolerated. The final sentiment is a call for individual conscience and action.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the UMMO case itself, the nature of UFO hoaxes, the psychological impact of belief in extraterrestrial contact, the potential involvement of intelligence agencies, and the ethical responsibilities of ufologists. The editorial stance is critical of the UMMO hoax and its harmful consequences, advocating for a responsible approach to UFO research that prioritizes truth and the well-being of individuals.

This issue of Fortean Times, No. 105, dated December 1997, focuses on various unexplained aerial phenomena and related research. The cover story, "LES CIEUX D'IRLANDE SCINTILLENT" (The Skies of Ireland Sparkle), by Dave Walsii, explores a persistent wave of UFO sightings in Ireland. The magazine also features reports from France, Thailand, and Australia, alongside discussions on ufological research and reader correspondence.

Article: "Troyes: La nuit des boomerangs-jumeaux" (The Night of the Twin Boomerangs)

This article, by Jean-Louis Peyraut, details an observation by Marianne P. in Troyes, France, on the night of July 20-21, 1997. She described seeing two luminous, boomerang-shaped objects dancing in the sky for about three to four seconds. She noted their extreme speed and 'zig-zag' trajectories, comparing them to 'fluorescent doves' or 'boomerangs'. The objects appeared to be in perfect coordination, forming a 'twin' formation. Peyraut notes that this description is reminiscent of the 'Belgian wave' and Kenneth Arnold's 1947 sighting. Marianne P. later attempted to find astronomical explanations but found them unconvincing. The article also mentions a possible corroborating event in Hautmont (Nord) on July 21, 1997, involving 'grains of rice' moving erratically, reported by Jean-Marc Gillot.

Article: "LES CIEUX D'IRLANDE SCINTILLENT" (The Skies of Ireland Sparkle)

Written by Dave Walsii, this piece investigates a reported wave of UFO sightings in the Bantry region of West Cork, Ireland, dating back several years. The Irish Centre for UFO Studies (ICUFOS), led by Eamonn Ansbro and Alan Sewell, is actively researching these phenomena, exploring methods like 'thought transmission via crystals' and suggesting the Earth is monitored by extraterrestrial craft. Walsii recounts his own investigation, including attending an ICUFOS conference and discussing their research methodology, which involves predicting 'close encounters' using a system of 'flight corridors'. He notes the ICUFOS's tendency to view UFOs as 'mental constructs' rather than physical craft, yet acknowledges the persistent reports of cigar-shaped, cylindrical, and diamond-shaped craft, as well as luminous spheres. Walsii also mentions other related phenomena such as Men in Black (MIBs), suicides, black helicopters, and alleged abductions, concluding that a 'bizarre social phenomenon' might be occurring in Cork and Kerry, regardless of whether the sightings are truly UFOs.

Article: "Des rivières bouillonnantes de flammes" (Rivers Boiling with Flames)

This article, translated by Christine Zwygart, describes two distinct phenomena. The first occurred in October 1994 along the Mekong River near Nongkai, Thailand, where luminous lights appeared underwater, rose to the surface, and then shot into the sky. Local folklore attributed this to a serpent laying eggs, while scientific explanations point to the spontaneous combustion of marsh gases, possibly diphosphane hydride. The second phenomenon, reported in New Scientist, concerns the Cataract River in New South Wales, Australia, where the water can ignite, reaching up to 20 inches high. This is attributed to methane gas released from coal mines managed by BHP, which creates flammable mixtures that ignite when exposed to air.

Letters Section

"VENUS RE-EXAMINÉE" (Venus Re-examined) by Rupert Knaplan

Rupert Knaplan responds to an article by Rob Irving regarding the Mexican UFO wave. Knaplan criticizes Irving for selectively using video sequences that support his theory that many sightings were misidentified as Venus. He points out that Irving omits daytime footage showing groups of over 20 UFOs and a specific incident near Mount Unzen, Japan, where an object appeared to stop and then move away from the moon in a way that Venus could not. Knaplan argues that Irving's approach is unscientific and urges readers to judge the Genesis III videos for themselves.

Rob Irving's Reply

Rob Irving defends his article, stating he never claimed Venus was the explanation for 'most cases' but rather expressed concern about misidentification. He explains his interest in the 1991 Mexican event involving Venus, Mars, Regulus, and Sirius, suggesting that subsequent reports were likely misinterpretations of mundane objects. He addresses Knaplan's points, explaining that the 'stop and move away' maneuver observed near the moon could be an optical illusion caused by camera zoom. Irving reiterates that while he acknowledges some UFO films are not easily explained, the Genesis III videos did not impress him as genuinely anomalous, and his article aimed to discuss this tendency to impose preconceived notions on observations.

Research Proposals

This section, attributed to Jean-Marc Gillot and Robert Alessandri, outlines various research ideas for UFO phenomena. Proposals from CNEGU members include comparing science fiction with UFO testimonies, studying the phenomenon's impact on the population, developing tools to calculate the probability of astronomical explanations for sightings, and creating databases of UFO shapes. Robert Alessandri suggests studying the motivations of extraterrestrials. Jean-Marc Gillot proposes using satellite data for UFO identification, expanding UFO shape databases, analyzing sky recordings for fast-moving objects, tracking witnesses' descendants, and connecting ufologists with individuals skilled in detector development. He also suggests engaging young scientists in serious UFO research.

Invitation: Les Repas Ufologiques Parisiens

This section announces monthly meetings of the "Les Repas Ufologiques Parisiens" (Parisian Ufological Dinners) held on the first Tuesday of each month at MELODINE in Paris. It highlights two reasons to participate: the regular schedule and the accessible location. The meetings are described as informal gatherings where ufological and paranormal news are discussed, with an emphasis on serious investigation and the exchange of information.

Le Pôle Documentaire Ufologique de Metz

This graphic illustrates resources available for UFO research in Metz, France. It highlights the availability of over 400 books at the Médiathèque du Pontiffroy and archival funds from CNEGU and other researchers at the Archives Départementales in St Julien-les-Metz, made possible by SCEAU/ARCHIVES OVNI.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include the persistent nature of UFO sightings across different regions (Ireland, France, Mexico), the challenges of identifying aerial phenomena, and the ongoing efforts of ufologists and researchers to investigate these events. The magazine presents a generally open-minded but critical stance, encouraging rigorous investigation and questioning simplistic explanations, while also acknowledging the possibility of genuine unexplained phenomena. There is a clear emphasis on scientific inquiry, data collection, and the critical analysis of evidence, as seen in the debates between readers and authors regarding the interpretation of video footage. The issue also touches upon the social and cultural impact of UFO reports and the organization of ufological communities.

This document is a collection of reader letters and editorial responses from the "Courrier des Lecteurs" section of a publication, likely focused on ufology and unexplained phenomena. The issue appears to be from October 1988, with contributions from various readers and the editorial team, identified as CNEGU.

Reader Correspondence and Editorial Responses

Jean-Marc Gillot's Letter:

Gillot writes regarding "Mystères de l'Est," pointing out anomalies in "Mystères de l'Est nº 2." He questions the description of a UFO sighting above the Revin transmitter on July 15, 1976, suggesting that the movement and speed described do not match the star Capella. He also notes that the representation of Capella's magnitude might be misinterpreted by those unfamiliar with astronomy.

CNEGU Response to Gillot:

The CNEGU acknowledges that the witness's description of the UFO's movement and speed does not align with Capella. They attribute this to numerous aberrations found in testimonies from the "Operation Saros" dossier, which often involve misidentifications. Regarding the magnitude representation of Capella, they state it's a classic depiction from astronomy software and that discussing ufology without astronomical knowledge is unwise.

Gillot on the St. Firmin Case:

Gillot asks if the investigation into the St. Firmin case (referenced on page 55) artificially reconstructed the movement and if the witnesses were interviewed. He posits that if all witnesses saw the same displacement, they might be lying, and questions why they didn't report different times to avoid association with the moon.

CNEGU Response on St. Firmin:

The CNEGU confirms that video tests were conducted by G. Munsch, and a luminous residual effect was achieved with the moon. They were unable to meet the witnesses as they had moved. However, they examined the location (referencing MDE nº3, page 87). They believe the witnesses did not lie and did not see displacements other than what was captured on video, except for a rapid disappearance behind a mountain. They suggest rereading the article for details.

Gillot on the Cussac Case:

Gillot references an article about Cussac and 'too curious crows' (page 108). He connects this to French balloon launch centers (Aire sur l'Adour and Gap Tallard) operating in 1967. He explains the wind patterns and how balloons might drift, and distinguishes between free and captive balloons.

CNEGU Response on Cussac:

The CNEGU thanks the reader for reminding them of "Espace Information nº9/CNES 1976," noting it primarily discusses stratospheric balloons. They acknowledge weather balloons but focus on the Cussac case potentially involving a balloon of several meters in diameter. They address the possibility of high grass concealing birds and the visibility of figures, suggesting that children might not recognize crows but that unusual circumstances could lead to misidentification. Regarding the "OVNI dans le Var" article, they appreciate the explanation that a deflated balloon might not have been fully deflated. They also discuss the thermal effect on a balloon causing it to descend and then ascend when the sun reappears, noting the witness mentioned it had rained.

Didier Charnay's Letter:

Charnay, editor-in-chief of UFO LOG, praises the editorial and agrees with its stance. He mentions planning an article on debunking for UFO LOG. He finds the concept of a 'missing mass' in ufology brilliant. He also comments on an article about the 'monkey' of Renève, finding it thorough. Charnay expresses frustration with articles listing the author's name at the end, preferring it at the beginning for easier reference. He was particularly interested in the article on the link between apparitions and sects. He appreciated the report on an observation in Certesti, Romania. He finds MDE a substantial publication but notes its lack of clarity and difficulty in navigation due to undifferentiated articles. He thanks the publication for mentioning UFO LOG.

CNEGU Response to Charnay:

The CNEGU states they prioritize content over form due to time constraints. They aim to be a tool for open-minded ufologists, with ideas taking precedence over aesthetics. They explain their consistent page layout for document coherence and use of illustrations for dense texts. They are not in favor of a 'zapping' reading style. Regarding author attribution, they decided to place it at the end to avoid influencing the reader's perception of the article based on preconceived notions about the author. They acknowledge that some readers avoid their bulletin for this reason. They also note that author names sometimes appear in subtitles. They thank Charnay for emphasizing the importance of debunking.

Book Announcement: "Pierres et Légendes de Côte d'Or"

This section announces the publication of a book titled "Pierres et Légendes de Côte d'Or" by Patrice Vachon. The book, 160 pages long, aims to document megaliths (dolmens and menhirs) and stones associated with legends in the Côte d'Or region. It includes reproductions of drawings by M. Gaveau from 1839 and explores a heritage that is often forgotten. The book is available for 70 F plus 10 F for shipping, with orders to be placed directly with the author.

Le Pêle-mêle (The Hodgepodge) Section:

This section presents a series of short, diverse reports:

• "A serpent biting its own tail...": Discusses the legend of the "Sachamama" in the Amazon, a giant reptile reported to have reappeared, noting the coincidence with the film "Anaconda" released around the same time.
• "A constellation of satellites that scares SETI...": Reports on the IRIDIUM satellite network becoming commercialized and the concern that the proliferation of mobile phones is polluting the planet and making it 'deaf' to space signals, according to an 'exobiologist.'
• "A rare atmospheric phenomenon...": Describes an unusual atmospheric event observed on October 17, 1998, near Pont-St-Vincent, France, characterized by extraordinary luminosity and colors, unlike anything seen before by a pilot.
• "Simian illusion...": A personal account of mistaking a moving silhouette in a field for a small monkey, which was later identified as a bird of prey. The author reflects on how perception can be influenced by prior knowledge and expectations.
• "(False) autopsy of a (false) extra-terrestrial (continued)": Discusses an article in "ENTREVUE" magazine about a video purportedly showing an alien autopsy, which is revealed to be a hoax orchestrated by a special effects professional. It references a previous article in "Mystères de l'Est" that questioned the set design.
• "When lightning strikes as a ball": Mentions a Science & Vie article explaining that ball lightning can persist due to a plasma being trapped in a magnetic field loop.
• "Saint-Vallier (continued)": Continues a discussion about the St. Vallier photo, noting errors and distortions in journalistic publications. It references an article in "La Vie de Bordeaux" from 1979 that featured the photo without explanation.
• "Le Matin" report: Cites a newspaper report from September 24, 1986, about UFOs sighted in Paris and Brussels, with an AFP photo located in Provence.
• "Le Pêle-mêle, (suite)": Continues with a list of newspaper articles from September 24, 1986, reporting UFO sightings across Europe, noting inconsistencies in photo attributions and dates, suggesting a large-scale atmospheric re-entry.
• St. Vallier witness revisited: Reports on interviewing Daniel Daubresse, a witness from the St. Vallier case, who states his observation was unrelated and likely an aeronautical misidentification.
• Video "The Stars Alight - The Crop Circles of 1997": Mentions a sequence showing a phenomenon similar to "Army Flares" (military flares).
• German UFO case: Refers to a case of luminous formations over the Baltic Sea, which was later explained as flares used as targets for military exercises.
• "Repas ufologiques Parisiens": Announces a monthly meeting for ufologists in Paris.
• "The clay pot against the iron pot.": Reports on a legal case where Robert Alessandri was ordered to pay damages for articles published in his "Univers OVNI" review, highlighting a perceived disparity in how justice is applied.
• "Extra-terrestrials out of work!": A satirical piece from "Info du monde" suggesting that extraterrestrials, once popular in various media, have become incompetent due to a lack of new spacecraft and training.
• "NASA Photos Explained": Explains a luminous phenomenon photographed in November 1969 as debris from a rocket separation, though a residual mystery remains regarding two unexplained lights.
• "Manifestations planned for the year 2000": Mentions plans for large-scale structures, including a giant saucer-shaped structure in Greenwich and a rolling "saucer" in France, as part of millennium celebrations.
• "OVNI... identified.": Reports on UFO sightings in Australia and Tennessee attributed to advertising balloons (Budweiser dirigible).
• "X posed nº3": Identifies a UFO sighting in Seattle as debris from a Russian rocket.
• "Sect: a collective suicide was planned in the Canaries.": Reports on a thwarted collective suicide attempt by a sect in the Canary Islands.
• "Ardennaise Observation.": Describes a luminous point observed in the sky, initially thought to be a shooting star, but with a sustained trajectory and unusual sound.
• "Meteorite": Reports on the study of an 8000-kilogram meteorite that fell in Turkmenistan.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, attempts to debunk them with scientific or rational explanations, and the critical examination of media reports and witness testimonies. The editorial stance, as expressed in the responses to readers, favors a rigorous, evidence-based approach to ufology, prioritizing factual analysis over sensationalism. There is a clear emphasis on debunking misidentifications and hoaxes, while also acknowledging the complexity and occasional enduring mysteries within the field. The publication seems to value critical thinking and encourages readers to engage with the material thoughtfully, as evidenced by the detailed responses and the inclusion of diverse reports in "Le Pêle-mêle."

This document is a collection of short articles and reports under the general heading "Le Pêle-mêle" (The Hodgepodge), spanning pages 142 to 145 of an unnamed magazine, likely published around October 1998. The content covers a diverse range of topics including cults, aviation, UFO sightings, conferences, and satellite observations, reflecting a focus on unusual phenomena and investigations.

Sectes

The "Sectes" section on page 142 discusses a report from "La Montagne" (August 7, 1998) about a cult leader in Brest, Finistère, who allegedly infiltrated an association for the homeless. Renaud Marhic, author of "Les sectes en Bretagne," is quoted describing the organization as a "caricatured sect" with an omniscient leader aiming for world peace and performing "miracles." Two individuals are mentioned as wanting to testify against the group. Another report from "L'Ardennais" (August 29, 1998) details UFO-related posters in Charleville Mézieres (Ardennes) following an observation by 280 people on August 10, 1998. The posters questioned if "God is an extraterrestrial" and suggested a connection between UFOs and sects like the Raelians, prompting a warning from the prefecture.

Aviation

Under the "Aviation" heading on page 142, a report from "La Montagne" (August 26, 1998) states that France is purchasing 32 Eurocopter helicopters. The Alouettes III will be replaced by the BK1117 C2, noted for being quieter and having a longer range (over 600 km) and higher hovering capability (4700 meters). The new aircraft will be delivered progressively from the year 2000, equipped with IFR for all-weather instrument flight and night vision (infrared) binoculars.

Conférences

Page 142 also mentions two conferences on UFOs held in October 1998. The first took place on October 23-24 in Vouziers (Ardennes), led by Jean Luc Lemaire of the CEOF's Ardennes section. The second was on October 25 in Chaussée-sur-Marne, led by Gilbert Scildknecht and Alain Blanchard of OVNI Marme.

CUSSAC: Compléments d'information

This section on page 142, attributed to E. Maillot, addresses a request from Eric Maillot for Bertrand Méheust's opinion on an explanatory hypothesis regarding the CUSSAC case. Méheust, contrary to initial assumptions, found the helicopter hypothesis plausible, with his only critique being the issue of noise, which he noted was absent during the initial observation, thus preserving an element of mystery. The author argues that while noise could be a criterion for non-identification, it's only valid if there are no cases where the expected noise was not reported. The text implies that such cases do exist within the known UFO literature.

Satellites "Flash"

On page 142, the "Satellites 'Flash'" section, previously covered in an earlier issue, notes that several popular science magazines have since discussed the phenomenon. The author has observed and photographed dozens of these satellites, describing the spectacle as impressive due to their significant brightness (up to magnitude -9) and the precise timing of their flashes. The satellites appear as predicted, their brightness increases rapidly, peaks, and then disappears as quickly. An interesting observation was made in Remiremont on November 11, 1998, between 17:58:00 and 17:59:26 UTC, where five satellites (Iridium N° 83, 84, 85, 86, 02) were observed showing their maximum brightness within a 3°/4° rectangle. Their magnitudes were chronologically -3, -8, -7, -4, and -3. The four initial satellites had been recently launched and were still in a common orbital position, with the fifth passing by. A sixth satellite (Iridium N° 10), magnitude -2, preceded them by 8 minutes and 34 seconds. The author recommends the website http://www2.gsoc.dr.de/satvis for predictions and observation programs.

Satellite IRIDIUM N° 15 Photos

Page 143 features two photos of the Iridium N° 15 satellite. The first, by Daniel Karcher, was taken on October 18, 1997, in Wittenheim (67), with a Gold 200 ISO film, magnitude -4, at 18:35:00 UTC, near Alpha Pegasi, using an 85mm f/1.8 lens. The second photo, by Gilles Munsch, was taken on November 22, 1998, in Cornimont (88), with Gold 800 ISO, magnitude -8, at 18:47 UTC, near the Giraffe constellation, using an Olympus OM1 with a 28-135mm zoom lens.

Une belle photo...

This section on page 143 discusses a photograph of a phenomenon discovered in an old issue of "Phénoména" from late 1988. The photo, taken on August 4, 1994, in the Mont-Blanc massif, was only noticed upon development. The original article in "Phénoména" (No. 24) suggested a hang glider or a jet, but the altitude and "V"-shaped exhaust "nozzles" presented problems. The author, then new to ufology, initially trusted the investigators. A turning point came on September 27, 1998, when a TV program showed ULMs near Mont Blanc. The author contacted the TV channel and later the Fédération Française d'ULM. The response indicated that while Mont Blanc has always attracted interest, the photo's characteristics (triangular shape, "nozzles") were likely due to optical effects from the sun reflecting off the wing, with the darker part being the pilot. The shadow zone is also noted near the Aiguille du Midi, and the rear part of the wing could be mistaken for an aileron. It's suggested that a climber might have been at the summit, visible as a curious bump. The photographer's lack of observation could be due to sun glare or distraction. This photo also appeared in "Dernières Nouvelles d'Alsace" on June 22, 1997, in an article titled "OVNI: depuis un quart de siècle..." which collaborated with SOS Ovni Est and was accessible online.

"Elohim"

On page 144, an article (source unknown, likely March 1999) reports that the singer Nayah, representing France in the Eurovision contest, was a former follower of the Raelian sect. Sylvie Mestre, her real name, joined the movement in the early 1980s, married Jean Parraga, a friend of Rael (Jean-Claude Vorilhon), the sect's founder. She recorded a song titled "Elohim," an anthem for the sect, which advocates for the arrival of extraterrestrials, the creators of life, who are predicted to take possession of Earth in 2025.

Scientif Lictions

This section on page 144, attributed to Francine Juncosa, references an article in "Scientifictions" (No. 1-vol 2) by Michel Meurger, specifically chapter "The Loch Ness Monster." Meurger is quoted stating that French ufologists who once chased saucers now focus on the moon as the source of most UFO sightings, while British theorists try to extract concrete evidence from testimonies. The author questions who else in French ufology, besides CNEGU and SERPAN (and historically M Monnerie and D. Caudron), might suspect the moon behind every UFO manifestation. While acknowledging the moon as a primary cause of misidentification, the author points out that the majority of their investigation files do not reference the natural satellite. The author's approach is described as "naturalist," and they argue that Meurger's discourse does not negate the idea that UFO observations often stem from real stimuli like celestial bodies, vehicles, or aircraft. The focus should be on understanding the stimulus, not just dismissing it as a misinterpretation or "delirium." The text defends CNEGU against accusations of underestimating cultural and socio-psychological factors, noting that others accuse them of the opposite. The conclusion is that those who view the Loch Ness Monster as purely mythical, stemming from collective imagination, were likely correct, thanks to phenomenological studies that have removed "reasonable" physical possibilities from the case.

Rotary Club

On page 145, the "Rotary Club" section details how media attention from UFO observations in the Ardennes attracted journalists. Christine Zwygart was interviewed by Aurélie Morel for the "Journal de la Haute-Marne," resulting in an article on September 1, 1998, about her passion and activities within CNEGU. An unexpected contact came from the "Rotary Club International de Chaumont," which invites individuals with unusual passions or original actions. Christine was invited to speak about her twenty years of involvement in the subject. The author, Gilles Munsch, accompanied her to a Rotary Club meeting on October 7, 1998, in Chaumont. Their presentation, longer than initially planned, focused on their work within CNEGU and SCEAU, using selected regional cases to explain the UFO problem and their investigative approach and methodology. The audience, primarily male, was initially curious but skeptical, yet the intervention seemed to reassure them and generate real interest, allowing the presentation to exceed its allotted time. The reception was described as sympathetic, providing an opportunity to explain their work and dispel common misconceptions about UFOs.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this "Pêle-mêle" section are the investigation of UFO phenomena, the analysis of potential misidentifications (such as celestial bodies or aircraft), the role of cults and their connection to UFO beliefs, and the reporting of aviation news. The editorial stance appears to be one of open-minded inquiry, presenting various accounts and perspectives while maintaining a critical and analytical approach, particularly in distinguishing between genuine phenomena and misinterpretations or sensationalism. There's a clear emphasis on scientific methodology and evidence-based research, as seen in the discussions about CNEGU's approach and the critique of purely speculative theories.