MUFON Minnesota Journal - No 038

Magazine Overview

This issue of the MINNESOTA MUFON Newsletter, Issue #38 from November 1992, covers organizational changes within the Minnesota MUFON chapter and features detailed accounts of UFO encounters and a significant debate within the ufology community.

From the State Director

William I. McNeff, the outgoing State Director, announces his acceptance of a Design Engineer position at M-tron in Yankton, South Dakota, effective before the new year. He expresses mixed feelings about leaving Minnesota MUFON and the Twin City area but is pleased with the new career opportunity. McNeff feels it's necessary to step down as State Director, outlining the duties as setting meeting times and places, directing UFO report investigations and suspected abduction experiences, providing support to impacted individuals, and appointing state officers. He explains the procedure for selecting a new director, which involves consulting with MUFON International Director Walt Andrus. McNeff consulted with four potential candidates: Buddy Bauerlein, John Dingley, Dick Moss, and John Sawicke. Three of them recommended Dick Moss, who has agreed to serve. McNeff heartily concurs and will recommend Moss to Andrus.

In a related development, Wally Moe has resigned as Assistant State Director to chair a new group dedicated to studying the paranormal. McNeff has accepted his resignation and appointed him Director of the Paranormal Study Group.

The Editors' Note expresses reluctance to see McNeff leave but wishes him success in his new position.

Dr. John Salter speaks to group

This section, an account by William McNeff, details a presentation by Dr. John Salter, Head of the Department of Indian Studies at the University of North Dakota, at the November 14th Minnesota MUFON meeting. Approximately 50 people attended.

Dr. Salter believes he has experienced four encounters: in 1941 as a boy in Kansas (seeing a rectangular UFO and later recalling a sketch of a boy receiving injections from a "man"), and in 1952, 1957, and 1988.

The 1988 encounter with his son, John Salter III, occurred in March while driving south from Wisconsin. They noticed a man in an overcoat, dark glasses, and a "Greek fisherman" hat rushing from a filling station. The son commented on the man's appearance, and Dr. Salter joked he looked like a "[screwed up] English professor." Dr. Salter felt the man's eyes on him. After leaving the station, the man followed them in a Volkswagen beetle, even when Salter slowed to 35 mph.

By 6:25 pm, they were far off course with no memory of the intervening time. The next day, a disc-shaped craft passed them, which they felt was a greeting and connected to the previous day's events.

Over the following months, their memories returned, recalling meeting short, gray beings and a taller, more human-appearing being at the end of a rough side road. They were escorted to a disc-shaped craft, given physical exams, and injections in the thyroid and thymus glands. The parting was friendly and emotional, with the taller being indicating they would meet again. Communication was telepathic, sounding like mainline American English.

Since the encounter, Dr. Salter has not experienced flu or colds and has not needed a doctor. He has undergone 24 physical changes, including growing one-third of an inch in his mid-50s. His son has also experienced changes, though less pronounced.

Dr. Salter views the encounter positively, stating, "We see this all as very friendly! I don't buy the gloom and doom stuff. I have talked to many people; the majority see this as positive." He also noted a strong correlation with social justice and ecological concerns.

During the Q&A, a question arose about the CBS Special "Intruders" and potential government involvement. Dr. Salter stated he had not personally experienced government interference or surveillance related to his MUFON role, contrasting this with his experience in 1956 when the FBI listed him as an agitator due to his civil rights activities. He managed to obtain 4000 pages of his FBI file, excluding national security-withheld parts.

Questions about the ETs' origin and planet climate were addressed. Dr. Salter said they come from the Zeta Reticuli group, that ETs are one race with variants due to inter-planetary migrations, and that the dim light on their planets might explain their large eyes. The Zeta group is one billion years older than our solar system.

Dr. Salter used an analogy of a disorderly family to explain how ETs might interact with humanity, suggesting a "social worker" approach rather than confrontation.

He stated that "a group of half-breeds are being created" as go-betweens when races come together. Regarding tests, he said he has not undergone blood or tissue tests but would do so under strict security. A scientist studying these changes has met with him over 50 times.

When asked if ETs could be trusted, Salter implied they should be trusted, believing they have overcome difficult times and can teach humanity balance between the individual and society. He stated that ET beliefs about God are similar to human religions, and they are neither demonic nor angelic but intelligent beings.

The account is based on W.I.M.'s notes, with a request for corrections.

Expanding horizons...

This section discusses changes reported by Dr. John Salter following his encounter, including sharpened psychic sensitivities and increased telekinetic episodes, particularly around electrical equipment. It notes that many UFO witnesses report similar phenomena like ghosts, precognition, and out-of-body sensations. Wally Moe proposes chairing a special group to study the paranormal aspects surrounding ETs, suggesting dedicated time at regular meetings or separate meetings for this purpose. Attendees will be asked to indicate their interest and time/location preference for a December 12 meeting.

Minnesota MUFON Meeting

Details for the Minnesota MUFON Meeting on Saturday, December 12, 1992, at The Irish Well (Downstairs), 1975 University Ave. (at Prior) St. Paul, from 1:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. are provided. Wally Moe will present intriguing material on the subject matter.

Library Additions

Three new books have been added to the library anonymously: "Silent Invasion" by Ellen Crystal, "Out There" by Howard Blum, and "The Watchers" by Raymon Fowler.

Investigator sees UFO

This report, from Barbara Becker of the UFO Research Network in St. Louis, details a sighting on May 15, 1992, around 5:30 p.m. (CSDT). Becker and her husband observed a black object moving through clouds, against the wind, and toward them. It was described as a flat, black rectangle that seemed to waiver. The object was estimated to be 7000' in altitude and about 500' away, appearing an inch long at arm's length. On July 18, the object reappeared, moving NW to SE, passing overhead, and disappearing South. Mrs. Becker noted a ripple-like movement from the outside to the inside of the rectangle. Identical sightings have been reported in Belgium and Indianapolis.

Also reported in UFO Intelligence Newsletter

Implant studied: MIT physicist David Pritchard, along with John Mack, organized a conference on alien abduction evidence at MIT. Pritchard stated that a tiny "implant" from UFO abductee Richard Price of Latham, NY, provides "absolutely no proof of anything," though he could not explain it in an obvious way. Some investigators suggest that while individual MRI scans are inconclusive, a large number of similar images, especially if spots correspond to reported implant locations, could be convincing. However, others suggest similarities could arise from subtle leading by investigators.

Star Wars Test?: Columbus, OH, Channel 14 TV news reported an unusual sighting on June 5, 1992, showing footage from the space shuttle of two objects flying, one appearing to fire at the other. No explanation was given, but the film was released by NASA.

Due to time constraints...

This section introduces the ongoing exchange between George P. Hansen and Jerome Clark regarding the alleged kidnapping and attempted murder of Linda Napolitano. Jerome Clark is described as a UFO historian and Vice President of the Center for UFO Studies. George P. Hansen is an engineer involved in parapsychological research.

"TORQUEMADA" RESPONDS TO JEROME CLARK

This article by George P. Hansen addresses Jerome Clark's response to Hansen's earlier paper, "Attempted Murder vs. The Politics of Ufology." Hansen thanks Clark for correcting a misinterpretation of his position. Clark had urged UFO researchers to suppress evidence of alleged felonies, stating that the case was "politically sensitive" and involved a political figure of international stature, thus requiring caution to avoid alerting a relevant agency and silencing potential witnesses.

Hansen finds Clark's rationale intriguing and reveals his own mindset. He notes that the Linda Napolitano case has been discussed in various publications and that Clark's statement reflects his belief in internal review and criticism within ufology. Hansen questions why Clark believes Hopkins is qualified to investigate kidnapping and attempted murder while urging others to refrain.

Hansen refutes Clark's suggestion about "alerting the relevant agency," pointing out that Hopkins had already made inquiries and even sent a picture of an agent to the UN. He also notes Hopkins' public statements about the case.

Hansen criticizes Clark's suggestion that a conspiracy at the highest levels of world governments is suppressing evidence, citing the involvement of UN Secretary General and other world figures. He suggests Clark, living in isolation, believes he has secret knowledge affecting public disclosures.

The article then reviews Clark's earlier writings on conspiracy theories, noting his description of Jacque Vallee's "Revelations" as "the ultimate conspiracy book" and his attacks on John Keel's speculations as "laced with paranoia." Hansen suggests Clark has deep, visceral reactions to conspiracies and struggles to grapple with them dispassionately.

Hansen contrasts the specificity of Clark's and Hopkins' claims (times, dates, license plate numbers) with their refusal to divulge information, impacting the investigation of the case. He states that prominent ufology leaders are actively impeding law enforcement.

Summary

This section summarizes the ongoing debate. Hansen notes that the Napolitano case illuminates the mentality of a prominent ufology authority. He points out that Clark vigorously opposes reporting the case to authorities, despite Linda's claims, believing he has special insight into the political situation. Hansen suggests that Clark and Hopkins' behavior might stem from a belief in a conspiracy, which he terms "grandiose" or "paranoid," ironically contrasting it with Clark's previous denunciation of conspiratorial thinking. Hansen concludes by urging readers to examine Clark's "Torquemada" article to assess his mental state.

Wasting Away in Torquemadaville

This section, written by George P. Hansen, addresses the personal attacks he has received from someone he refers to as "Torquemada," who has focused his "rage" on Hansen. Hansen clarifies that he has not published on the Linda Napolitano case, delivered lectures, investigated it, or is a proponent of it. He attended a meeting at the request of Budd Hopkins and expressed serious reservations about the case's complex and ambiguous elements.

Hansen states that "Torquemada" has misrepresented his views and intentions, creating a "ludicrous caricature." He recounts proposing a compromise at a New York meeting: giving Hopkins more time to wrap up his investigation before critics resumed their search for "Richard and Dan." Hansen believes this offer was made in good faith and understood as such by most attendees.

He describes "Torquemadaville" as a place where dissent from "the grand inquisitor's dictates" carries personal risk. Hansen acknowledges he failed to keep his mouth shut and is accused of collusion with "demonic forces." He pledges to be brief.

This is Torquemada's response?

Hansen addresses "Torquemada's" November 23 memo, calling it "featherweight stuff." He dismisses the accusation that Clark and Andrus control information in their UFO magazines, stating it's the function of editors to make judgments. Hansen notes that he has been recognized for presenting "pros and cons of highly controversial information in a fair and evenhanded manner" and offers to publish any material from critics of the Linda case in IUR, aiming for the case to be debated and resolved within the ufology community.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The newsletter exhibits a strong focus on UFO sightings, abduction experiences, and the paranormal. There is a clear editorial stance in favor of open investigation and discussion of UFO phenomena, as evidenced by the detailed reporting of Dr. Salter's encounter and the extensive coverage of the Hansen-Clark debate. The newsletter also highlights the internal dynamics and debates within the ufology community, particularly concerning the handling of controversial cases and the potential for government conspiracy. The transition of leadership within the Minnesota MUFON chapter is also a significant administrative theme.

This issue of the International UFO Reporter (IUR), dated November 30, 1992, features a cover headline focused on 'The Torquemada Controversy.' The magazine is published by International UFO Reporter and is priced at $3.00. The primary content appears to be an extensive editorial by Editor Jerome Clark.

Editorial: The Torquemada Controversy

Jerome Clark dedicates a significant portion of this issue to addressing a dispute with a figure identified as 'Torquemada.' Clark begins by stating that his own skepticism regarding the 'Linda case' is consistent and sensible, while Torquemada's position makes no sense. He questions why Torquemada is so agitated if Linda is lying, and if she is not, why doesn't she act on her own behalf.

Clark explicitly denies accepting Linda's story of being harassed, kidnapped, sexually molested, and nearly drowned by government agents, calling these claims 'highly unlikely.' He notes that while only Linda knows the truth, at least two other individuals claim to have seen 'Richard and Dan,' though this does not prove they are government agents. Clark defines an 'ambiguous element' as a situation where the true identity of individuals involved remains unanswered and unproven by evidence, relying only on speculation.

Clark asserts that Torquemada is the only chronicler who continues to labor under the delusion that Clark is anything other than an unbeliever in Linda's claims. He suggests Torquemada might want to communicate with Dennis Stillings, an acquaintance of Clark's, who was the first person Clark discussed the matter with upon returning from New York.

Clark reiterates his intention to foster communication between proponents and critics of the Linda case, stating that others involved understood his good intentions. He contrasts this with Torquemada, who he claims concocts 'nutty communiques' and attributes malign motives to Clark, accusing him of serious social crimes.

Clark also addresses Torquemada's claim that he was trying to stop the investigation. He cites Joe Stefula, who reportedly left the case on his own, feeling he had learned all he could and had concluded the story was a hoax.

Clark humorously notes Torquemada's mention of his own birthplace in Minnesota, contrasting it with Linda's alleged isolated existence in a small Minnesota town. Clark finds it plausible that the disappearance and abduction of a prominent international political figure would be a 'politically sensitive' matter. However, he strongly refutes Torquemada's idea that he believes in a 'conspiracy at the top levels of the world's governments in suppressing evidence about this UFO abduction and the subsequent kidnappings, sexual molestation, and attempted murder.' Clark dismisses Torquemada's accusations as grammatically poor and heated.

Clark further clarifies that Torquemada's claims about him possessing 'secret, crucial knowledge of the international political situation regarding the UFO abduction phenomena' are fabrications. He states Torquemada 'just made this up,' likening him to a novelist.

Reflecting on his departure from New York, Clark states he had grave reservations about the claimed involvement of the VIP in the abduction event. After further reflection and discussions with rational critics, his doubts have solidified into 'virtual certainty that no such thing happened.'

Clark then invites readers to escape 'Torquemadaville' for 'rational discourse,' which he hopes to see in future pages of IUR from participants like Hopkins, Butler, and Stefula.

In a final thought, Clark suggests that the failure of analyses to address all the puzzling elements of the case might be due to the absence of a vital, undetected truth. He expresses hope that this truth will emerge in IUR and wishes all serious investigators the best, while criticizing those who engage in 'unsolicited polemics.'

The issue concludes with Clark's address in Canby, Minnesota, dated November 30, 1992. A handwritten note from the Editor states that this will be the last of the 'Horse/Clark exchange' unless some unforeseen conclusion develops.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are skepticism versus belief in UFO abduction cases, the nature of evidence and speculation, and personal disputes within the UFO research community. The editorial stance, as presented by Jerome Clark, is one of critical inquiry, demanding evidence, questioning motives, and advocating for rational discourse over what he perceives as unfounded accusations and emotionalism. Clark positions himself as a measured skeptic who is open to truth but unwilling to accept unsubstantiated claims, particularly those involving alleged government conspiracies and high-profile individuals.