Merseyside UFO Bulletin - Vol 3 No 6 - 1970

Magazine Overview

Title: Merseyside UFO Bulletin
Issue: 3:6
Date: December 1970
Editors: John Hamey and John Rimmer

This issue of the Merseyside UFO Bulletin, dated December 1970, adopts a critical and analytical approach to the study of UFO phenomena. The editorial reflects on the publication's journey since its inception in 1968, noting a shift from a desired focus on sober, scientific articles to one that often engages with the eccentricities of UFO groups, a formula that reliably elicits reader response. The editors observe a general lack of quality in many English-speaking UFO bulletins, characterized by poor writing and spelling, though they acknowledge exceptions like the BUFORA RESEARCH BULLETIN, UFO CHRONICLE, S.I.U.F.O.P. NEWSLETTER, and COS-MOS. The publication's own image is discussed, with the editors humorously noting that their informal approach, as depicted on a previous cover, has earned them praise from the US but criticism from 'Southerners'.

Editorial: Us and Them

The editorial, titled 'Us and Them', critiques the general state of UFO publications, lamenting the prevalence of poorly written and edited material. It contrasts this with more serious publications and notes the tendency for some groups to focus on sensationalism. The editors express a preference for a more rational and scientific approach, while acknowledging that the subject matter often attracts less conventional viewpoints. They highlight the perceived 'trade mark' of many semi-literate journals as a lack of understanding of basic grammar, such as apostrophe usage.

Letter to the Editor from Peter Rogerson

Peter Rogerson writes in response to a perceived offense taken by Norman Oliver regarding his (Rogerson's) impression that Oliver was favorable to John Keel's ideas. Rogerson defends his viewpoint, suggesting that even if 'cranks and kooks' are not in the executive committee, their influence is real due to a lack of names and addresses. He criticizes the tendency for UFO groups to be dominated by such individuals, drawing a parallel to economic principles where the subscriber dictates the tune. Rogerson also expresses his personal prejudice against occultism and spiritualism, viewing them as 'unsavoury cultism'. He argues that open-membership UFO bodies are susceptible to crank domination due to economic laws. He agrees with Alan Sharp's view that John Keel's world is one of the 'insane', but finds it disturbing that Keel's data might not be invented, suggesting a widespread 'epidemic of a curious, systematised insanity'. Rogerson notes the resurgence of magic-like phenomena in the modern age, linking the UFO to Jung's concept of the mandala (psychic wholeness) and the poltergeist to elemental destruction. He sees these as symbols of the 'soul-destroying Orwellian state' and a 'backlash' against perceived state oppression in America.

An Open Letter to Alan Sharp by John Rimmer

John Rimmer addresses Alan Sharp, an astronomer, regarding the apparent rejection of scientific method in ufology. Rimmer argues that while astronomical methods are useful for astronomical phenomena, they may not be suitable for the UFO phenomenon, which he suggests is not astronomical in origin. He posits that evidence from researchers like Vallee and Keel contradicts the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH). Rimmer proposes that the problem might be better studied through other disciplines, such as psychology and the subconscious. He uses an analogy of 'cometologists' who isolate their study from astronomy to illustrate how a new field can develop its own frameworks. Rimmer believes that the Condon report, while controversial, served a purpose by diverting attention from unproductive research lines. He asserts that new avenues in ufology are not a rejection of scientific method but a plea for a new scientific framework. He suggests that the 'people will be the UFOs, or rather the UFO phenomena,' implying a psychological or subjective component. Rimmer concludes by inviting Sharp to explore these new avenues with him, emphasizing the need for lively minds, scientific training, imagination, wit, and common sense.

Our Visit to Warminster by Dave and Natalie Gould

Dave and Natalie Gould recount their visit to Warminster, a location known for UFO sightings. They describe their initial visit to Cradle Hill, where they met a couple who had previously taken impressive photographs of a sighting, which were later published in Flying Saucer Review. During their stay, they explored local prehistoric sites and noted a theory among the local crowd that many sightings follow lines of alignment between tors and barrows. Their second night was uneventful, but on the third evening, they witnessed a boomerang-shaped object with five white lights moving silently at a low altitude, which banked and disappeared. Arthur Shuttlewood, a local ufologist, also reported seeing a large white object. On their final evening, a larger gathering included Scouts and BUFORA observers, with several objects sighted, though not all were definitively identified as UFOs. Shuttlewood, however, confirmed some as definite sightings. The Goulds found the visit informative and described Arthur Shuttlewood as a 'nice, genuine person', noting discussions about poltergeist activities, strange smells, and witchcraft in the area.

Beware of the Barnpots by John Harney

John Harney's article humorously critiques the nature of many UFO group meetings, suggesting that speakers often face audiences who are more interested in 'vibrations' and esoteric theories than in rational discussion. He depicts a scenario where a speaker's attempts to explain 'vibrations' are met with vague assertions and applause for unscientific ideas. A character representing a 'pompous old buffer' claims a PH.D. in 'Metaphysical Philosophy and Idle Speculation' and dismisses the speaker's question as 'atheistic, negative materialism'. The article culminates in a dialogue about 'men in black', with a 'Dotty Old Lady' warning of their influence, only to be revealed as a fictional character named Joe Bloggs, who has no knowledge of them. The chairman then concludes the meeting with a lighthearted exchange about drinks.

The UFO is Alive and Well and Living in Fairyland by John A. Rimmer

John A. Rimmer argues against the purely extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH) for UFOs, finding it 'unattractively mechanical' and lacking in 'life'. He suggests that the phenomenon's humanistic aspect, where UFO occupants behave as expected by humans (e.g., collecting samples), is significant. Rimmer proposes two explanations: either the phenomenon is entirely internal to the human mind, reflecting human nature, or its origins are external but so incomprehensible that they are rationalized into a human framework. He discusses two books: 'Passport to Magonia' by Jacques Vallee, which links UFOs and 'Fairyland', and 'Visions and Beliefs in the West of Ireland' by Lady Augusta Gregory, which records Irish folk tales. Rimmer notes the parallels between UFO descriptions and fairy lore, suggesting that both are manifestations of a common experience. He highlights Vallee's attempt to widen the scope of UFO study by examining historical accounts and folklore. Rimmer contrasts Vallee's approach with that of John Keel, suggesting Keel has gone further in attempting to outline an explanation. He laments that such books may only be read by niche interest groups, potentially overlooking the insights they offer to folklore studies.

Of Hoaxes and Hoaxers by Paul Hopkins

Paul Hopkins examines the prevalence of hoaxes in the field of UFO research. He notes that great hoaxes of the past have made authorities cautious. Hoaxes are broadly categorized into three types: those for amusement, those by cranks with ulterior motives (such as a genuine belief in being alien messengers or a desire for prominence), and those by publicity addicts or those seeking financial gain. Hopkins emphasizes that a hoaxer may operate across multiple categories. He outlines factors to consider when analyzing a hoax, including the cost to the hoaxer (time, finance, reputation) and the damage incurred by the hoaxed. The success of a hoax is difficult to assess, requiring determination of the hoaxer's motives and allowance for the time factor between the event and investigation. He notes that UFO sightings, particularly lights in the sky, are transient phenomena, making investigation challenging. Hopkins discusses how opportunists can exploit sightings, and how a carefully planned hoax can be successful due to the influx of investigators and the 'lunatic fringe' causing confusion. He uses the Warminster situation as a potential example of this complex nature. He also describes how a 'class one' hoax can escalate if the hoaxer gains recognition, citing the Adamski saga as an example of a hoaxer trapped by his own creation, with factions like the IGAP and the Aetherius Society perpetuating it.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The Merseyside UFO Bulletin consistently adopts a critical and analytical stance towards UFO phenomena. While acknowledging the existence of numerous reports and the public's fascination, the publication actively questions simplistic explanations, particularly the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH). There is a strong emphasis on the need for scientific rigor, even as the editors explore alternative frameworks that incorporate psychology, folklore, and mythology. The bulletin also addresses the practical challenges of UFO research, including the issue of hoaxes and the quality of information presented in various UFO publications. The editors appear to favor a more sober, evidence-based approach, while not shying away from exploring the more unusual and speculative aspects of the subject, often with a touch of dry humor.

Title: MUFOB (Merseyside UFO Bulletin)
Issue: 3
Volume: 3
Date: 1971 (indicated by page numbers 70-72 and article content)
Publisher: Merseyside UFO Bulletin
Country: UK
Language: English

This issue of MUFOB delves into the complex world of UFO phenomena, focusing heavily on the nature of hoaxes, the psychology behind belief in extraterrestrial contact, and the investigation of alleged paranormal events.

The Hoax Phenomenon and UFO Belief

The lead article posits that modern individuals, feeling insecure and facing existential threats like nuclear holocaust, are susceptible to new religions that offer security. It highlights Adamski-type space being contactees as fulfilling this need, creating a self-perpetuating legend. The author argues that successful hoaxes require claims of contact with mythical beings bearing messages for mankind, citing Dan Fry and Truman Bethurum as examples. Alternatively, claims attributing violence and interference to aliens can appeal to aggressive instincts, though these are deemed less successful than those of friendly visitors.

The article discusses the challenges faced by UFO investigators, noting that each claim or sighting can burden them for months. It suggests that beyond mistaken identity, the conclusion is often either a genuine extraterrestrial event or a deliberately perpetrated hoax. The author controversially proposes a fourth class of hoax: those created specifically for the study of hoaxing and its cumulative effects on people. This would involve setting up a controlled hoax on a grand scale, akin to a 'second Warminster,' to observe how a hoax gains momentum, the influx of 'parasites and nutters,' the total cost, and crucially, witness reactions.

Experimental Hoax Design

To illustrate the potential for such an experiment, the article describes Warminster as a 'hoax-sized town' with a large, transient population and a deep connection to primitive history and occult beliefs. It suggests that an area with similar properties could be used for an experimental hoax. The author then outlines practical, albeit illegal, methods for creating a hoax, including making artificial craters in fields using an iron pipe and an explosive mixture (magnesium, aluminum, tin), and creating aerial lights with polythene bags filled with coal gas, a battery, and a bulb. The article acknowledges the legal ramifications, including trespassing, damage to crops, and discharging explosive materials, and notes that hoaxers often have antisocial tendencies and a desire to be seen as special.

The Risks and Rewards of Hoaxing

Setting up a large-scale hoax is presented as a complex undertaking requiring careful planning and potentially the cooperation of local bodies, including the police and council, and permission from aviation authorities for aerial displays. The author concludes that a well-organized UFO hoax could offer significant insights into human psychology and reactions to perceived unknown phenomena, allowing investigators to better understand genuine UFO sightings and flaps.

Notes, Quotes & Queries: The Penny Lane Ghost

This section reports on further developments concerning the 'Penny Lane Ghost' in Liverpool. A report in the Liverpool Echo details ongoing mysterious sounds of ghostly footsteps in a printing shop. Previous families had reported similar phenomena, including strange voices and bumping noises in 1945, and footsteps in 1930. Mr. Ken Shackman and Mr. John Hampton, owners of the printing business, have been researching the house's history. They have also managed to record the ghostly sounds on a tape recorder, which they describe as 'shuffling and banging noises' enough to 'send a shiver down anybody's back.'

Kensington Meeting Reminder

A reminder is issued for a COS-MOS meeting at Kensington Central Library on Saturday, February 27th, at 7:30 p.m. John Rimmer is scheduled to discuss his views on UFO groups, and Norman Oliver, Director of COS-MOS, will give a lecture.

Bulletin Publication Status

Despite a prolonged postal strike and increased charges, the Merseyside UFO Bulletin confirms its intention to publish the usual six issues in 1971. It is noted as an informal publication without a rigid timetable.

Editorial Information

The bulletin is edited by John Harney, with John A. Rimmer as Associate Editor and Alan W. Sharp as Science Editor. The contact telephone number is 051-327 2146. Opinions expressed by contributors are not necessarily shared by the editors.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the psychological underpinnings of belief in UFOs and paranormal phenomena, the methodology and ethics of UFO investigation, and the reporting of specific local paranormal cases. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, exploring the potential for deception and the psychological needs that might drive belief, while also engaging with the practicalities of investigating such claims. The publication aims to provide a platform for discussion and research within the ufology community, acknowledging the informal nature of its production and distribution.