AI Magazine Summary

Serie A brev nr 2

Summary & Cover Medlemsblad 002 juni 1963

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You’re on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

20,263

issue summaries

Free. Always.

Support the Archive

Building and maintaining this collection is something I genuinely enjoy. If you’ve found it useful and want to say thanks, a small contribution keeps me motivated to keep expanding it. Thank you for your kindness 💚

Donate with PayPal

AI-Generated Summary

Overview

BREVCIRKELN, Series A, Letter No. 2, published in 1922, is an issue that delves into the complex relationship between authority, dogma, and the phenomenon of flying saucers.

Magazine Overview

BREVCIRKELN, Series A, Letter No. 2, published in 1922, is an issue that delves into the complex relationship between authority, dogma, and the phenomenon of flying saucers.

Authorities, Dogmas, and Flying Saucers

The article begins by presenting an American perspective on significant matters, acknowledging that conditions in the USA differ from those in Sweden, leaving the reader to judge the validity of the presented views. It asserts that religion and psychic phenomena share a common ground, both dealing with events and beliefs that do not fit within the framework of Newtonian physics. However, it notes that Western orthodox religions, with few exceptions, deny the existence of such manifestations or condemn them as works of the devil, a view still held by some in high positions.

Modern science, while not enthusiastic about theological doctrines due to their opposing nature and historical animosity (dating back to the Inquisition), tends to view religion and psychic phenomena as originating from the same dark medieval roots of dogma, superstition, black magic, and intolerance towards science. Science remembers the suffering of its pioneers during the Middle Ages. The case of Roger Bacon (1214-1294) is highlighted as a tragic example. Despite living in an era of superstition, Bacon was an intellectual giant who worked in a monastery under strict control. His scientific insights were only deciphered about 700 years later, in 1922, by Professor William R. Newbold at Pennsylvania University. Bacon's manuscripts contained theories on astronomy, biology, and electronics that were remarkably contemporary with 1920s advancements. He also invented a reflector telescope and microscope, making accurate observations of the Andromeda Nebula and human cellular processes, discoveries that would take centuries to be rediscovered.

Bacon, described as a mystic, also predicted things like cars, motorboats, and airplanes, and believed the Earth was round. This contrasts with the prevailing view during the Inquisition, where the Earth was considered flat and the center of the universe. The article draws a parallel with Galileo, the father of modern astronomy, who was persecuted by the Church. The issue suggests that religion once claimed to have all the answers and secrets of the universe, but this led to trivial pursuits like debating the number of angels on a pinhead.

Today, science has revealed much about the universe. The article posits that God has passed the torch of enlightenment from religion to atheists, urging humanity to understand the universe and divine laws to accelerate its development. It argues that dogmatic theologians failed to explain the mysteries of life and the universe, consistently providing incorrect answers. Science, by seeking answers directly from nature (astronomy, geology, biology, psychology), is seen as uncovering the truth. The wonders of technology, stemming from scientific inquiry, have improved health, living conditions, and access to knowledge, making life on Earth more livable. The ultimate paradise, it suggests, is created by science.

Two examples of martyrs for knowledge are mentioned, but thousands more suffered similar fates, hidden in church history. The article explains why science is suspicious of anything related to religion or psychic phenomena, attributing it to an inherent aversion to such topics.

This background, it is argued, should clear the air from medieval and modern dogmas, whether religious or scientific. The focus should be on facts, with science being respected when justified. However, this respect should not blind us to its flaws. The article claims that a hard core within both religious and scientific worlds uses sophisticated methods to suppress information that threatens established systems designed to control public thought. This suppression is exemplified by the 'flying saucer phenomenon,' which some powerful interests deemed important enough to recruit science and religion into a 'condescending inquisition' to suppress facts and news sources. They employed the same 'excuses' as their 'orthodox fish ponds,' relying on the public's trust in authority and experts.

These 'authoritative explanations,' some more fantastic than the phenomena themselves, were believed by the public, who readily accepted them when seasoned with authority. The article questions why authorities went so far to mislead the public, stating that the answer lies in the fact that the modern scientific world is a direct byproduct of Newtonian physics, which forms the basis of civilization and its institutions. Proponents of this school are materialists who believe that everything in the mineral, plant, and animal kingdoms must conform to Newton's laws of space, time, and gravity. Thus, humanity, the most developed being, has been intentionally subjected to the same laws as inanimate matter.

The Nature of Reality and Flying Saucers

The article posits that as a person thinks and believes, so they become. It reiterates that the great teachers and occult schools confirm this divine law, which modern science has rediscovered. This law is always in effect, regardless of belief.

Returning to flying saucers, the article questions how these 'ethereal types' fit into Newton's world of time, space, and gravity. It suggests they emerge from different reference planes in time or higher vibrational frequencies, becoming visible to observers on Earth. The author states that these machines defy Newton's laws, and any scientist publicly suggesting belief in them would face ridicule and be branded a heretic.

The reasons for this resistance are twofold: Firstly, recognized authorities are displeased when the masses question their knowledge, and their prestige masks ignorance. Secondly, acknowledging the interplanetary concept would shake the beliefs of billions, causing serious repercussions for the highest authorities. The article then turns to orthodox theologians, suggesting they should accept the interplanetary concept since flying saucers seem to be woven into religious narratives. However, it notes that flying saucers challenge old doctrines about hell, purgatory, and heaven, which the church fathers cannot afford to abandon, as it would expose them and lead to a loss of public respect.

The Role of Financial Interests and Anti-Gravity

The article identifies the 'key players' behind the 'flying saucer inquisition' as financial kings who, through their control of Earth's riches, control the entire situation. They prefer to remain anonymous, operating behind scientific, military, and religious fronts, knowing that the public respects science, trusts the military, and holds traditional religious beliefs.

Their motive is rooted in materialism, stemming from Newton. They are still anchored in the concept of raw strength, and their transport methods are based on action and reaction. These machines consume oil, and giant monopolies control these vast underground resources, representing billions in investments. If an anti-gravity principle were discovered, it would revolutionize transportation, making air travel superior to land and sea, allowing for faster, cheaper, and more efficient transport of enormous tonnages.

The article acknowledges that the concept of anti-gravity might be dismissed as fantasy, but asserts that flying saucers demonstrate its principles. It also points to evidence of this principle being used in ancient civilizations, citing the city of Sacsahuaman in the Andes, Peru. Massive stone blocks, some weighing 200 tons, were transported from quarries 32 km away, across rivers, deep ravines, and up to the mountain's peak. Experts studying these blocks are baffled, and no plausible explanation exists, but it is certain that brute force was not the method used.

The Unpreparedness of the World for UFO Secrets

It is argued that humanity must have lost certain great secrets in the past, perhaps during cataclysms that wiped out continents and civilizations. The article poses a hypothetical question: what if we rediscovered these secrets?

Such a discovery would represent a giant leap for humanity, but it would pose a problem for trusts with vast oil reserves. Oil interests only favor advancements that require oil meters. The current economic system is based on profit, and the idea of giving something for nothing is almost forbidden. The article clarifies that it is not condemning the economic system but stating facts. A strong fact is the discovery of a fuel-free propulsion method, which would cause panic not only in the oil industry. While other uses for oil might be found, it would take time, and the entire economy would falter.

Therefore, the world is not ready for the secrets of flying saucers. Nor are warmongers ready to accept the philosophy conveyed by the pilots of these craft, who clearly demonstrate that they are peace-loving beings. Even if political tensions ceased, armies, navies, air forces, and arsenals could not be demobilized. Such a step would displace millions of workers from production and draw others into industries involved in war material manufacturing.

The article questions the traditions of armies and navies and the many brave heroes of history, suggesting that despite pride, humanity remains barbaric, still adhering to the principle of 'an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.' Brutal strength still reigns supreme, with reason and intelligence having only minor influence. Humanity has survived through this brutal strength. However, it is suggested that perhaps on a future day, the art of killing, which is so refined and perfected, will be lost. Only then, the article implies, will flying saucers be officially recognized.

In summary, the situation is described as follows: flying saucers and what they represent threaten a complete control system with deep roots in scientific, religious, economic, and governmental circles. The article does not condemn or endorse this 'gigantic machinery of authorities' but argues that it is a necessary evil. However, it condemns those authorities who overstep their bounds by denying people their rights. All freedom-loving people should condemn this modern inquisition that hides and distorts the truth.

Flying saucers are presented as just one facet among phenomena that have been suppressed because authorities view truth as a curse to our way of life. The article points to these powerful elements in our culture and suggests they are out of sync with the cosmic clock. The hands of this clock may be approaching the hour of humanity's destiny, but humanity remains largely unaware because a few withhold facts from the many.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the conflict between established authority (religious and scientific dogma) and new, potentially disruptive knowledge (UFOs, anti-gravity). The editorial stance is critical of dogmatism and suppression of information, advocating for a focus on facts and a questioning of authority, particularly when it leads to the denial of truth and the control of public thought. The article champions the pursuit of knowledge and the potential for human advancement through scientific discovery, while also highlighting the dangers of entrenched power structures that resist change for economic or ideological reasons.