MAGONIA

Magazine Overview

MAGONIA, issue number 85, published in July 2004, is a magazine focused on interpreting contemporary vision and belief. It is priced at £1.75 and is based in the United Kingdom. The cover features a striking black and white photograph of a heavily laden man, with the main headline "WHEN THE ALIENS DROP US A LINE". Sub-headlines tease articles on alien languages and an investigation into Magonia and the 'New Cromwellians' attacking Fortean Times.

Editorial Notes

The "Editorial Notes" section, written by John Rimmer, expresses disappointment with a BUFORA Limited Company Report and Financial Statement, finding it overly bureaucratic and lacking in information about the organization's actual activities. Despite BUFORA's admirable project to create a computerized archive of case reports since 1963, the editor notes that proposals to reduce meeting quorums and the reliance on 'virtual' meetings suggest a disconnect from its members. The piece critiques the organization's focus on corporate-like administration over its core purpose.

The Aliens Speak - and Write

This article by Mark Newbrook delves into the linguistic aspects of UFO reports, highlighting the scarcity of qualified linguistic analysis of phenomena such as scripts resembling hieroglyphics, channelled speech, and telepathic messages. Newbrook attributes this gap to the limited overlap between UFO enthusiasts and linguistics experts. He notes that many amateur researchers, while well-intentioned, lack the necessary expertise and are often predisposed to interpret experiences as genuinely extraterrestrial. The article questions whether alleged alien languages and scripts are genuine, how they compare to known human languages, and the plausibility of their structures and concepts. It also touches upon the work of Gary Anthony's Alien Semiotics Project and the challenges of analyzing potentially alien communication systems.

What are the structures and features of all these languages, especially any that at least might conceivably be genuine? How do they compare with each other and with known human languages and scripts, in respect of 'linguistic typology'?

Newbrook discusses the difficulties in analyzing alleged alien languages, particularly when reports suggest 'holistic' understanding rather than word-by-word comprehension. He notes that while human languages exhibit vast diversity, genuinely alien languages would likely present even greater unfamiliarity in structure and semantic concepts. The article examines various modes of alien communication, including telepathy, spoken, and written forms, and questions the authenticity of claims that contactees can speak or write these languages. It suggests that languages reported as being too similar to human languages are unlikely to be genuine, while radically novel systems would be difficult, though not impossible, to analyze. The piece also critiques the work of researchers like John Elliott, whose computational linguistics approach is deemed potentially over-optimistic and lacking in general linguistic knowledge.

The MUFON Journal Project

Anthony and Newbrook requested samples of alleged alien speech and writing for analysis. They sought descriptions of scripts, translations, recordings of spoken language, and information on the circumstances of their discovery. The article points out that many people claim 'holistic' understanding, which complicates linguistic analysis. It also notes that some alleged alien languages are presented as having no preconceived meaning for sounds, which is contrary to how human languages function.

Rodwell's Material

The article critically examines the work of Mary Rodwell, particularly her book "Awakening: How Extraterrestrial Contact Can Transform Your Life." Newbrook criticizes Rodwell's approach for its uncritical acceptance of alleged psychic and similar phenomena, its lack of persuasive evidence, and its promotion of pro-UFO literature while ignoring skeptical or mainstream scientific viewpoints. He argues that Rodwell's work is damaging to critical assessment, often distorting facts and presenting a biased perspective. The linguistic aspects of Rodwell's material, particularly claims made by contactee Taylor, are scrutinized. Taylor's claims of advanced linguistic abilities in human infants ('Star Children') and her own purported ability to write and speak 'unusual' scripts are questioned due to a lack of experimental evidence and the subjective nature of the claims. The spoken material from Taylor's video is compared to glossolalia ('speaking in tongues'), with suggestions that it may be influenced by her exposure to Japanese.

Analysis of Taylor's Claims

Newbrook finds Taylor's claims about alien languages lacking in scientific rigor. He notes that Taylor suggests these languages lack stable structures, making them immune to empirical analysis. This, he argues, is contradictory to the very definition of language, which relies on stable structures and meaningful units. The article suggests that such claims might be intended to prevent scientific scrutiny. While acknowledging that radically novel alien language systems could be difficult to analyze, Newbrook insists that evidence must be provided to support such dramatic claims, and that advocates must cooperate with researchers to render their claims testable.

NEW CROMWELLIANS?

This article by P L Frankson critically examines the writings and persona of Colin Bennett, who publishes a webzine called "Panzerben's Combat Diaries." Bennett is described as an entity that espouses a belief that reality itself is a construct, a philosophical fakery, and that facts are manufactured deception. Frankson questions the nature of Bennett's existence, noting the multiplicity of pseudonyms used (e.g., Brent Ables, Yvonne Cook, Ron Mensch, Dr Betty Shackster Bax, Patricia Farson), suggesting a fragmented or egoid identity. The article posits that Bennett's syntax is appropriate only for a corpse, and that his writings are characterized by a 'conspiracy' narrative, accusing Magonia and Fortean Times of corrupting editorial policies. Bennett's views are contrasted with those of Charles Fort, whom he allegedly portrays as a foe of science. Frankson also critiques the alleged 'fifth-columnry' conspiracy involving editors of Fortean Times and Magonia, naming individuals like Paul Sieveking and Mark Pilkington as part of this alleged scheme.

Plotters Remain Calm: Conspiracy Denied

This section reports on Magonia's investigative reporters approaching individuals named in Bennett's allegations. Paul Devereux, Paul Sieveking, Andy Roberts, Dr David Clarke, and John Rimmer all dismiss the claims as amusing or untrue, attributing Bennett's accusations to desperation or a misunderstanding of their work. The article highlights that Bennett's webzine is described as containing "feeble fillers masquerading as satire, and a vast and tedious deal of rant and cant." It specifically references an article from "Combat Diaries 11" where "Dr Farson" allegedly detailed a "secret take-over of the Fortean Times by Magonian sceptics." The article then quotes "Dr Farson" alleging a "tentacular conspiracy" involving Magonia, Fortean Times, and various individuals, including Paul Sieveking, Mark Pilkington, Andy Roberts, and David Clarke, accusing them of controlling events and influencing publications.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of Magonia consistently adopts a skeptical and analytical approach to phenomena related to UFOs, alien contact, and alternative belief systems. The magazine prioritizes rigorous investigation, linguistic analysis, and critical assessment over anecdotal evidence or unsubstantiated claims. There is a clear emphasis on distinguishing between genuine phenomena and potential misinterpretations, hoaxes, or elaborate belief systems. The critique of organizations like BUFORA and individuals like Colin Bennett and Mary Rodwell underscores Magonia's commitment to intellectual honesty and evidence-based reasoning. The editorial stance is one of cautious inquiry, demanding substantial proof before accepting extraordinary claims, particularly in the complex fields of linguistics and consciousness studies.

This issue of Magonia, identified as issue 14 and dated Summer 1979 (new series 14), is primarily focused on critical analysis of UFO phenomena, skepticism, and the intersection of folklore, history, and conspiracy theories. The cover prominently features 'THE PELICAN WRITES.' with a subtitle in Spanish, suggesting a critical and perhaps satirical tone.

The Pelican Writes

This section, written by 'The Pelican,' offers a sharp critique of the UFO community and its proponents. It begins by discussing the alleged excitement generated among UFO believers by a report released by the Mexican air force concerning an encounter with a group of UFOs. The report, accompanied by video, was released to Jaime Maussan, who has been criticized on the UFO UpDates mailing list for his unsupported testimony and reliance on false claims, including a previous promotion of a fake UFO video.

The Pelican highlights Maussan's history of supporting dubious stories, such as the 'Dr Reed' claim of an alien in his freezer. The author expresses suspicion that many UFO stories touted by Maussan may not be entirely true. The specific incident involved a Mexican air force plane detecting unexplained objects via radar and FLIR, but not visually. The Mexican secretary of defense's decision to release the details to Maussan instead of scientists is questioned.

The article notes the confusion added by various scientists offering conflicting explanations for the phenomena, ranging from US stealth aircraft to meteors and atmospheric electrical phenomena. It also touches upon the controversy surrounding the timing of the release, which some denied was to distract from a scandal known as the Ahumada case.

The text then critiques the mindset of some ufologists, particularly Greg Boone, who pondered reasons for debunking UFO cases and suggested a collapse of nationalism if the truth were known. The Pelican mocks Boone's 'joke debunking explanations' for UFO sightings.

Skepticism as Mystique and Combat Diaries

A significant portion of the issue is dedicated to a critique of Colin Bennett's writings, particularly his 'Combat Diaries' and the concept of 'Skepticism as mystique.' The author argues that Bennett's work is characterized by paranoid narcissism and the expression of fictions that acquire 'reality' through endless repetition, likening it to Goebbels' techniques. The critique extends to Bennett's apparent rejection of objective reality and his embrace of postmodernist 'discourse,' which the author suggests is a device to avoid rational criticism.

The article contrasts Bennett's approach with that of writers like Paul Devereux and John Rimmer, who are seen as engaging with magical thinking and liminal experiences in a more insightful way, and who did so long before Bennett. The author finds irony in Bennett's simultaneous rejection of science and reliance on a consensual reality for his own writings.

Readers' Letters

This section features correspondence from readers, offering diverse perspectives:

• David Sivier, Bristol, responds to Peter Brookesmith's article on the abuse of history in UFO arguments. Sivier emphasizes the distinction between history and folklore, noting that history concerns large-scale change, while individual survivals (like Anastasia or Davy Crockett) do not constitute history proper. He discusses the Norman Conquest and the Roswell UFO crash, highlighting the importance of evaluating sources, detecting biases, and the relevance of oral history. Sivier references works by Luisa Passerini, Alessandro Portelli, Paul Thompson, Raphael Samuel, Rob Perks, and Alistair Thomson as useful for understanding 'stigmatized knowledge' and the interpretation of memory and ideology in historical accounts.

Book Reviews

The issue includes several book reviews, critically assessing recent publications in the field:

• Jerome Clark, Strange Skies: Pilot Encounters with UFOs is reviewed by an unnamed author. The review notes Clark's cautious approach to 'technological intelligence' and his focus on historical UFO reports from pilots. It highlights the significance of the Kenneth Arnold and Chiles-Whitted sightings but questions Clark's assertion that this world is no longer ours alone. The review criticizes the implausible explanations for the Arnold report and the tendency of ufologists to accept testimony uncritically. It also mentions the 'pelicanist' term coined by James Easton.

• Lynne D. Kitei, The Phoenix Lights, is reviewed by John Harney. Harney finds the book unscientific, noting Dr. Kitei's reliance on ufologists' opinions and her adoption of a belief-oriented approach. He criticizes her for giving extensive space to 'New Age' and extravagant views while downplaying more scientific perspectives like that of Bruce Maccabee. Harney also points out potential issues with the credibility of some individuals quoted, such as Jim Dilettoso.

• Michael Barkun, Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America, is reviewed by John Harney. Harney describes Barkun's book as examining the fusion of traditional radical right conspiracy theories with modern beliefs of alien intervention, particularly noting the incorporation of anti-Semitic myths like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion into the New Age milieu. The review highlights the connections between alien abduction, Satanic abuse, and themes of sexual violence, drawing parallels to older anti-Catholic literature. It also discusses the appropriation of anti-Semitic imagery and stereotypes in UFO narratives.

• Gian J Quasar, Into the Bermuda Triangle: pursuing the truth behind the world's greatest mystery, is reviewed by an unnamed author. The reviewer criticizes Quasar's approach as a 'scatter-gun approach' with brief mentions of events and an overreliance on words like 'mysterious' and 'incredible.' The reviewer contrasts this with Larry Kusche's more skeptical and detailed debunking of the Bermuda Triangle mystery and expresses doubt about the accuracy of Quasar's account.

• Barbara Forrest and Paul R. Gross, Creationism's Trojan Horse: the Wedge of Intelligent Design, is reviewed by an unnamed author. The review explains that the book traces the activities of 'Intelligent Design' proponents in the American education system, highlighting their claims of 'irreducible complexity' and opposition to evolution. The reviewer notes the book's focus on the 'Wedge' document outlining their plans and questions the extent to which it represents a genuine conspiracy or the traditional American hobby of conspiracy mongering. The review also draws a parallel between 'Intelligent Design' and 'communist' in the context of the 'Wedge' document and contrasts American 'conservatism' with British conservatism.

• Ronald Hutton, Witches, Druids and King Arthur, is reviewed by an unnamed author. The review describes the book as a collection of essays on English paganism and the birth of the modern witchcraft religion, covering topics such as perceptions of King Arthur, the mythology of Glastonbury, the Druid movement, and the manufacturing of 'ancient myths.' The reviewer finds the chapters on classical paganism dull but suggests the rest would interest readers interested in earth mysteries. The review notes Hutton's critical views on the use of ritual nudity and other transgressional practices in some pagan groups.

• Peter Lamont, The Rise of the Indian Rope Trick: the biography of a legend, is reviewed by an unnamed author. The review explains the legend of the Indian Rope Trick and discusses various 'rational' explanations, including mass hypnosis and conjuring tricks. It reveals that the story originated from a fictional newspaper report by John E. Wilkie in 1890 and spread through 'eyewitness testimony.' The review suggests that some accounts may have been based on a real trick but became exaggerated over time, and that other testimony was fraudulent.

• Robert E Bartholomew and Benjamin Radford, Hoaxes, Myths and Manias: why we need critical thinking, is reviewed by an unnamed author. The reviewer notes that the book is a compilation of articles on the psychosocial aspects of anomalous experiences, covering subjects relevant to Magonia. It highlights David Clarke's chapter on the phantom helicopter of 1973 as particularly interesting, describing it as a social panic generated by social strain.

Other Sections

• Hold the Back Page features two short items: 'Square Prancing,' about a supposed squirrel population decline in Russell Square, London, and a plug for Mark Pilkington's publishing venture, Strange Attractor.

• Pope and Dolan is a brief note questioning the resemblance between American ufologist Richard Dolan and British ufologist Nick Pope.

• Magonia readers' meetings are announced, detailing monthly gatherings in the London area.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of Magonia are skepticism towards paranormal claims, critical analysis of UFO reports and their investigators, the historical context of myths and legends, and the fusion of conspiracy theories with various belief systems, including New Age and political ideologies. The editorial stance is clearly one of critical inquiry, challenging unsubstantiated claims and examining the psychological and sociological factors behind belief in the paranormal. The magazine appears to advocate for rigorous evidence-based investigation and a clear distinction between historical fact and speculative interpretation.