Magonia - No 13 - 1983

Magazine Overview

MAGONIA 13, published in 1983, is an independent journal dedicated to the examination of the UFO phenomenon and its societal impact. It is published by its editors and has no affiliation with other UFO magazines or groups. Views expressed by contributors are not necessarily endorsed by the editors.

Editorial

The editorial reflects on the editor's experience sorting through old UFO periodicals, noting how the 'Earthly Theory' (ETH) was once unchallenged. It critiques the ufological tendency to criticize mainstream science while simultaneously exhibiting a lack of critical thinking within their own field. The editor points out that while ufologists of the past were awestruck by interplanetary visitors, their understanding of space exploration was often conservative compared to the scientific advancements of the time.

Questioning the 'Real' Phenomenon by Claude Mauge

This article, a translated version of a presentation at a UFO meeting, defines key terms: pre-UFO (any observation called UFO), IFO (Identified Flying Object), and near UFO (unexplained observation). Mauge argues that the 'indistinguishability' of UFO and IFO cases, coupled with the unreliability of many ufologists, renders much UFO literature since 1947 of questionable value. He presents arguments against the ETH, including the 'anthropo-psychological component' and the lack of definitive proof. Mauge advocates for a socio-psychological model, drawing parallels with folklore, religious apparitions, and altered states of consciousness. He suggests that the UFO phenomenon might originate from the human nervous system rather than external sources, citing research on visual perception and dreams. He concludes that while thousands of reliable cases exist, the socio-psychological hypothesis, possibly combined with natural physical phenomena, appears to be the most fruitful working hypothesis, though it too could be a 'system of belief'.

'Earthlights' Further Comments by Ian Cresswell

Cresswell offers a critique of Paul Devereux's 'Earthlights' theory, finding the book interesting but frustratingly unclear. He questions the link between the objective core of the phenomenon and subjective elements. Cresswell suggests that Devereux's reasoning is weak, particularly regarding the 'tectonic origin' of cases, and that the book inadequately reviews geological literature. He notes similarities to natural light phenomena like ball lightning but questions their relevance as a complete UFO explanation. Cresswell criticizes the ufological tendency to denigrate human achievements in favor of 'higher intelligences' and suggests that the idea of extraterrestrial creation of humanity is prevalent among some ufologists.

Conspiracy Update by Roger Sandell

Sandell reviews several books on conspiracy theories, noting similarities between the world of ufology and conspiracy investigation. Both groups see themselves as custodians of rejected information and often lack critical assessment skills. He discusses Richard Gilman's biography of Nesta H. Webster, who linked the Russian Revolution to occult conspiracies, and Henry Lincoln's 'The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail,' which explores the Priory of Sion and a supposed lineage of Jesus. Sandell also reviews James Webb's 'The Occult Establishment,' a survey of twentieth-century occultism, highlighting its discussion of Nazi occultism and its influence on various movements.

Our Unreliable 'Eyewitness' by Paolo Toselli

Toselli examines the unreliability of eyewitness testimony in UFO cases. He explains that memory is not a perfect recording but a reconstruction influenced by interpretation, prior knowledge, and inference. The 'mental set' of a witness, or their expectations and predispositions, significantly shapes their perception and recall. Toselli highlights how labels and external information can distort memories, and that confidence in a memory does not equate to accuracy. He emphasizes the importance of allowing witnesses to provide free narratives before asking specific questions to avoid influencing their reports.

Letters

Several letters address previous articles. Colin Bord comments on the Roy Jennings photograph of alleged ball lightning, arguing it was likely caused by camera malfunction rather than a genuine atmospheric phenomenon, refuting Paul Devereux's interpretation. Dave Simpson critiques Alvin Lawson's 'Birth Trauma' hypothesis, calling it unfalsifiable. The Unexplained magazine points out that their exclusive interview with the Cottingley Fairy perpetrators was not credited by some newspapers. A letter from 'Yours sincerely' discusses the 'BT' debate and Alvin Lawson's ideas.

The Earthlights Controversy: John Harney Replies

John Harney responds to Paul Devereux's critique of his review of 'Earthlights.' Harney defends his position, stating that Devereux's arguments are rhetorical rather than convincing. He reiterates that while some UFO phenomena might be 'tectonically produced,' Devereux's claims about similar phenomena occurring on a smaller scale in the British Isles, unrelated to seismic activity, are unsubstantiated. Harney criticizes Devereux's interpretation of historical accounts and his reliance on 'pseudo-scientific gobbledygook.'

Books Reviews

• The Pennine UFO Mystery by Jenny Randles: Reviewed as entertaining but lacking in sufficient detail for serious research. The reviewer notes the book's reliance on 'pseudo-clues' and questionable chronological correlations.
• Close Encounters of an Australian Kind by Keith Basterfield: Described as a useful introduction to 'new ufology' and the image hypothesis, but criticized for being too short and overpriced.
• Let's hope they're friendly by Quentin Fogarty: Focuses on the controversy surrounding a UFO film, suggesting that money rather than science was the primary motivator.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue consistently questions the nature of UFO evidence, emphasizing the unreliability of eyewitness testimony and the psychological factors influencing perception and memory. There is a strong critique of unsubstantiated claims and a call for more rigorous investigation. The magazine appears to lean towards a socio-psychological explanation for many UFO phenomena, while acknowledging the existence of unexplained cases. Conspiracy theories are examined critically, and the 'Earthlights' controversy highlights the ongoing debate between physical and psychological explanations for UFO sightings. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, seeking to debunk unsubstantiated claims while remaining open to genuine anomalies.

This document is page 20 of the magazine MAGONIA, containing reviews of several publications. The content is primarily text-based, with no visible images or advertisements on this page. The reviews cover topics related to UFO research, psychical research, and broader philosophical discussions on knowledge and sociology.

Book Reviews

NICAP and UFO Research

The page begins with a discussion about NICAP, suggesting that by 1978, it had no connection to serious UFO research, with most of its leading members having departed years earlier. The article also notes that the organization's director had sold its mailing list to a Canadian neo-Nazi group. The author expresses uncertainty about what would have happened if a particular film had been shared with Australian ufologists Keith Basterfield and Bill Chalker. The piece touches upon the common phenomenon of 'believers' and 'skeptics' engaging in abusive arguments, and how individuals tend to see what they want to see in UFO-related evidence. The author admits to having no idea what is depicted in the film in question and states that the book reviewed does not provide further clarity.

The Don Juan Papers: Further Castaneda Controversies (Edited by Richard De Mille)

This review highlights that the book is a massive compilation of essays that extend beyond the topic of Castaneda. It delves into the nature of knowledge, the ethics of sociology, and the circumstances under which the scientific community might close ranks to protect its interests. The reviewer suggests that most of the essays would be of significant relevance and profit to readers of MAGONIA. Key themes discussed include the concepts of authenticity and validity, the relationship between science and religion, and the limits of relativism. The writing style is described as excellent.

The Society for Psychical Research 1882-1982, a history (By Renee Haynes)

The reviewer is critical of this history of the SPR, labeling it the 'worst kind of "official" history' because it allegedly tells the reader nothing and presents individuals as overly virtuous. Historical controversies are reportedly ignored or superficially addressed. The reviewer posits that many leaders within the SPR view the organization as a 'Victoriana appreciation society' and are reluctant to critically examine its past or foster new research. After 100 years, the SPR is seen as not having gained general acceptance for its ideas and still appearing as a defensive, aging in-group. The review notes that Haynes criticizes SPR dissidents who formed ASSAP for their lack of critical spirit. While acknowledging that some ASSAP members may indeed be uncritical, the reviewer points out that Haynes' book itself is not noted for its critical spirit. The review makes a provocative comparison, suggesting that if Anthony Blunt had wished, he might have easily entered the SPR's 'charmed circle'. The reviewer concludes by stating that the SPR has always presented multiple facets, and Haynes' history, by focusing on only one, has ill-served the organization and enriched the prejudices of skeptics.

A UFO Guide to Fate' (Compiled by Gray Barker)

This compilation is described as an invaluable resource, providing a comprehensive index of UFO-related articles published in Fate magazine from its inception in 1948 up to the end of 1980. The index is the result of extensive work and has been computerized, allowing for various printouts and data arrangements. It enables users to access information chronologically, demonstrating the evolution of UFO literature. Notably, the review points out that the last use of the phrase 'flying saucer' in a Fate title occurred in January 1963, preceding the first abduction report in June of the same year. The guide includes alphabetical listings by author, subject, and title, as well as samples of photographs, illustrations, and advertisements. The compilation is considered a well-produced and useful tool for serious researchers seeking access to information from a key UFO source, enhanced by an informative and humorous introduction by Gray Barker.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this section of MAGONIA revolve around critical analysis of UFO research organizations and publications. There is a clear skepticism towards overly uncritical or biased historical accounts, particularly concerning organizations like the SPR. The editorial stance appears to favor rigorous examination, questioning the motives and methodologies of both proponents and critics within the UFO field. The value of comprehensive indexing and archival work, as exemplified by the 'UFO Guide to Fate', is also emphasized, suggesting an appreciation for systematic research tools. The overall tone is analytical and critical, encouraging readers to approach the subject matter with discernment.