La ligne bleue survolee - No 03 - 1980

Magazine Overview

This document is issue number 3 of the bulletin "LA LIGNE BLEUE SURVOLEE" (The Blue Line Overflown), published in 1980 by the "CERCLE VOSGIEN LUMIERES DANS LA NUIT" (Vosgian Circle Lights in the Night). The cover features the title prominently, along with a stylized map of a region filled with repeated text, and a question mark, suggesting an investigative and questioning tone. The bulletin is based in Chavelot, France.

Table of Contents (Sommaire)

The table of contents outlines the articles and topics covered in this issue:

• A Rich Start to the Year in Observations
• In the Haut-Saintois Region
• Detection
• Pursued by a UFO?
• Symbology
• A Flying Disk at High Altitude Above Epinal
• Last Battles at La Croix de Virine
• Mistakes
• Catalogue 79
• Investigations

Cercle Vosgien 'Lumières dans la Nuit'

The bulletin provides the social headquarters address: 1, Rue des Cèdres Bleus, Chavelot, 88150 THAON LES VOSGES. It also details the membership conditions:

• Active Member: 50.00FF
• Active Student Member: 25.00FF
• Honorary Member: Starting from 20.00FF

Individuals wishing to join are invited to request a membership form and return it with their payment. Additionally, a club sticker is available for 5.00 FF to help promote the circle.

The circle emphasizes that the review "LA LIGNE BLEUE SURVOLEE" is sent to all members and also distributed as a press service to ufological groups. They are seeking feedback and suggestions from their readers.

Call to Action for Ufology Enthusiasts

The bulletin encourages passionate ufologists to participate in meetings and observation nights, read their "Special CNEGU" issue (10F) which includes a catalogue of 1978 observations in the Northeast, and contribute to archive research. Readers are also asked to save press clippings related to the phenomenon and participate in investigations, which are presented as the source of all research and explanation.

Article: A Rich Start to the Year in Observations

This section details numerous observations recorded at the end of January 1980, continuing into subsequent months. A specific report focuses on an event on February 15, 1980, in LE THILLOT (88160) at 20:35 local time.

Chronological Account of Facts Reported by Mme Cécile V.

Mme Cécile V. reported seeing a very bright, immobile, enormous star-like object in the sky towards Luxeuil (W-SW), about 10-15 degrees above the horizon. It was brighter than the full moon, though its apparent diameter was only about a third of it. Using 12x40 binoculars, she observed two "balls" attached together, one red and one white, within a larger, diffuse white sphere with visible points. The object was immobile but exhibited a slight, non-directional oscillation. After a few minutes, the positions of the balls inverted, and the phenomenon suddenly disappeared in place without a trace. No noise or TV interference was noted. The observation lasted about ten minutes and was reported to the gendarmerie. The accompanying article from "LIBERTE de l'EST" dated 17-02-1980 is cited.

A diagram illustrates the appearance of the luminous phenomenon: initially, a white "diffuse" appearance with small points, and after the "inversion," a red ball and a white ball.

Article: In the Haut-Saintois Region

This section details an investigation conducted by Jean Pierre Février and the Cercle Vosgien LDLN regarding an observation on March 14, 1978, by three witnesses in the Vallée de la Vraine. The investigation notes that other observations have frequently occurred in the same region, identified as Saintois or Xaintois, part of the Vosges and Meurthe et Moselle departments. The area is described as a plateau with narrow, deep valleys and wooded hills.

Investigation: Madame Henri Legros at Rainville

The investigators interviewed Madame Henri Legros in Rainville, who reportedly observed a luminous phenomenon that frightened her.

#### Observation on July 19, 1976, at Rainville

Madame Legros recounted that she was woken up by a large light, initially thinking it was a fire, but realizing it was too bright. She saw a "big ball," described as a "really red," piercing light, shining through the shutters. She felt it was so intense it might be seen through the shutters. The object was perceived as a large moon, but red and piercing. She later saw it as a large, round, red light, and then a white light. She stated it was not too high and seemed close, near the hill of Mont St Jean. She described the light as resembling fire and unlike anything she had ever seen. She did not check the time but estimated it was late at night. Earlier that day, she and a child had seen a light high in the sky, which she initially dismissed as an airplane.

She admitted to being afraid and not opening the shutters to look directly. She confirmed the light was not a fire. When asked if there was a heat emission, she couldn't recall. She stated the daytime light was much stronger than stars seen at dusk. She described the object as high, very high, and a large, brilliant white point. She confirmed she could distinguish its shape at night.

She explained her reluctance to open the shutters, fearing it was too close. She also mentioned that her husband had been ill, and she didn't want to wake him. She recalled that the event occurred the night before the second anniversary of her husband's death (July 20, 1976), suggesting a possible connection.

A road worker who was familiar with her husband mentioned that others had seen similar phenomena in Toul. Madame Legros was convinced it was not an airplane because it remained stationary for too long. She believes the event occurred around midnight or 1 AM.

Investigation Details and Hypotheses

The investigators noted that Madame Legros recalled the date precisely due to its connection with her husband's death. They hypothesize that the luminous phenomenon might have preceded her husband's death, drawing a parallel with theories on premonitions or manifestations from the afterlife, referencing Camille Flammarion. However, they caution against concluding that all UFO phenomena are explained by this, emphasizing this is a specific case analysis.

Madame Legros felt oppressed and almost unable to move during the observation. She could not recall any heat emission. She confirmed the light was much stronger than stars and appeared as a brilliant white point. She admitted to being scared and not opening the shutters, but stated the view through the shutters was very clear, as if there were no shutters.

#### The Chapelle Saint Jean

This is a geographical reference to a chapel on Mont St Jean, near Rainville, with historical and religious significance.

#### Observation in Autumn 1977, at Rainville

Madame Legros mentioned that Monsieur Tête had reported an observation by a couple, Monsieur and Madame Petit, living opposite the bakery in Rainville. The investigators interviewed them. This observation is described as a "banal" luminous point at high altitude, with little interest.

Monsieur and Madame Petit's Account

In September 1977, around 9 PM, the Petit couple observed a very high, bright star-like object that remained immobile for a long time before moving erratically and disappearing very quickly towards Vichey. Military aircraft were observed in the area at the time. The witnesses were reportedly very impressed by the "star's" bizarre behavior, though they did not retain the exact date.

#### Observation of an Airplane

An account from two young girls, Mlle Marie Andrée Jeanjean and her sister Marie Roberte, who observed a phenomenon on a Wednesday evening in February 1978, near Mirecourt. They were returning from Mirecourt around 7:30 PM when they saw a red point and a green point above a wood, near the Mirecourt-Juvaincourt aerodrome. They initially thought it was an airplane but were surprised by its lack of movement and non-flashing lights. They felt it was approaching them and became scared. They reported no effects on their vehicle or headlights.

Analysis of the Jeanjean Sisters' Observation

The investigators concluded that the Jeanjean sisters had mistaken an airplane for a UFO. The description of the phenomenon, the time, and the location (near the Mirecourt aerodrome) corresponded well with an airplane. The investigators noted that the sisters were likely influenced by press reports of other observations and that they did not observe carefully. They also commented on how secondary effects, like the tendency to report observations after hearing about others, can occur and are sometimes overlooked by investigators.

Article: Detection

This section discusses the compilation of various UFO observations and highlights recurring physical characteristics, particularly electromagnetic perturbations. These include engine stoppages, disruptions in radio and TV transmissions, and headlights turning off.

Measuring and Recording Electromagnetic Effects

An idea emerged to measure and record these physical effects, enabling 24-hour surveillance of a limited environment without fatigue, relying on current technology. Several types of "magnetic detectors" exist, differing in their operating principle and sensitivity.

Commercial Magnetic Detector

The bulletin introduces a type of magnetic detector widely available for the general public. Its principle of operation is simple: a magnetized compass needle on a pivot orients itself with the Earth's magnetic field. Any variation in its position, indicating a local magnetic field perturbation, is detected by a "photocoupler." This triggers a "buzzer" (alarm) for 15 seconds, followed by a luminous indicator (LED) that retains the information until the perturbation ceases. Unfortunately, no trace of the perturbation remains afterward.

#### Advantages:

• Simplicity and high reliability.
• Long autonomy (4 x 1.5V batteries).
• Affordable (100-200 FF).
• Available as a kit or fully assembled.

#### Disadvantages:

• Requires horizontal positioning and specific orientation.
• Must be isolated from mechanical shocks and vibrations.
• No information memory.

The address for "Ets RADIO MJ," the supplier, is provided (19, rue Claude Bernard 75005 PARIS). The bulletin advises consulting the C.V.L.D.L.N. for further information.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around UFO sightings, investigations, and the analysis of witness testimonies. The editorial stance is one of diligent inquiry, seeking to document and understand these phenomena. There is a clear emphasis on methodical investigation, data collection (including witness accounts, chronological reports, and even attempts to measure environmental effects), and critical analysis, as seen in the debunking of the Jeanjean sisters' sighting. The circle actively encourages public participation in observations and research, positioning itself as a hub for ufological information in the Vosges region. The inclusion of membership details and a call for feedback indicates a community-oriented approach to ufology. The connection drawn between a UFO sighting and a witness's husband's death, while presented cautiously, highlights a willingness to explore unconventional interpretations within the broader context of unexplained phenomena.

This issue of ELECTRONIQUE PRATIQUE, extracted from pages 160 and 161, focuses on the topic of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) and related phenomena. It includes a detailed case study of a UFO pursuit, a comprehensive system for classifying and mapping UFO sightings, and several witness accounts.

UFO Pursuit Case Study: Raon-aux-Bois to Epinal (VOSGES)

The main article, "POURSUIVI PAR UN O.V.N.I ? DE RAON-AUX-BOIS A EPINAL (VOSGES)", recounts an incident that occurred on January 28, 1980. At 4:15 AM, a man named M. was driving to work when he observed a luminous orange 'bean' surrounded by a clearer orange halo, with a diffuse zone above it, at an estimated altitude of 30 meters. The phenomenon appeared to follow his car at a constant speed and altitude. M. stopped his car to observe the object, which had stopped near a bush about a hundred meters to his right. Feeling uneasy, he drove away, and the phenomenon resumed its pursuit. The object stayed to his left, sometimes disappearing behind terrain. It eventually overtook him, crossed the road, and flew over a house. The observation lasted about 20 minutes and covered approximately 15 kilometers of a winding route. The object's shape was estimated to be about 4 meters wide and 3 meters high. No noise or other effects were reported by the witness, and the weather was clear.

Another sighting is detailed from July 30, 1980, in Epinal. Sylviane Golczewsky, an amateur astronomer, observed a luminous point moving from south to north, with an intensity similar to Venus. Using binoculars (7x50), she identified a clear, blue-white, lenticular object. Her husband, Robert, also observed it. The object briefly appeared to become circular before returning to its initial profile, as if a disc had rotated. It then moved away, disappearing from Sylviane's view but briefly visible to Robert with his binoculars. The observation lasted one to two minutes, with constant luminosity and a seemingly rectilinear trajectory. The weather was partially cloudy, with medium visibility, and no secondary effects were noted.

Symbology for UFO Phenomena

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to a proposed symbology for representing UFO phenomena on maps. Developed by Michel Sorgues and the CNEGU (Centre National d'Études et de Recherches sur les OVNIs), this system was first diffused in February 1978 and later improved. The goal is to create a common representation that is simple to use and does not distort the reported ideas of the phenomenon. The symbology is based on four criteria:

1. Classification of Observation and Situation: This involves representing the observation point with a circle. The circle can be empty (passage at altitude), semi-filled (low altitude or near ground without landing), or filled (landing). Specific symbols are used for water immersion/emersion and for altitude classification.
2. Evolution of the Phenomenon: This category uses vectors attached to the main symbol to indicate the phenomenon's direction of origin and departure. Unflashed vectors show the origin, flashed vectors show the departure direction, and bi-flashed vectors indicate a return to the origin. The absence of vectors signifies uncertainty about provenance or direction.
3. Importance of the Phenomenon: This is represented by secondary indicators on the vectors or symbols, such as vertical lines for single objects, triangles for five objects, squares for ten, and filled squares for fifty objects. If the phenomenon splits, its importance is indicated for each direction.
4. Presence of Entity and Contact: This category uses letters to denote occupants or entities. 'K' symbolizes a human-like form (body, head, limbs), and 'V' symbolizes an undefined form originating from the sky. A contact on the ground is represented by a filled circle within a concentric circle, followed by the entity symbol. Sightings of entities without a craft are also symbolized.

The symbology is noted to be inspired by meteorological mapping systems and emphasizes the importance of correlation between technical detection (radar, etc.) and visual observation. It advises against overcomplicating the system and suggests using existing symbols composed logically for unique cases.

Other Witness Accounts

The issue also includes several shorter reports of UFO sightings:

• Jarménil (April 14, 1979): Four witnesses in a car reported seeing an object composed of five balls (one red, four white) near the ground. The object rapidly moved towards their car, causing panic, before 'turning off' at a close distance without sound.
• Docelles (April 14, 1979): A witness observed a large red ball descending regularly in the sky and disappearing behind the horizon. This sighting is noted as being related to the Jarménil case.
• Saint-Ame (April 22, 1979): Three men observed three luminous phenomena in the sky, described as red, green, or white.

Misconceptions

A section titled "MEPRISES OU CHERCHEZ LES RESSEMBLANCES!" (Misconceptions or Look for Similarities!) presents a series of comic panels that humorously suggest alternative explanations for UFO sightings, such as collective hallucination, effects on animals, psychological issues of witnesses, or even traces left by extraterrestrials. It also humorously suggests that ground traces might be from moles.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently focuses on UFO phenomena, presenting witness testimonies, investigative reports, and analytical frameworks. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious inquiry into UFO sightings, encouraging the sharing of ideas and suggestions from readers. The development and promotion of a standardized symbology for UFO reports indicate a desire for more rigorous and systematic data collection and analysis within the UFO research community.

This document, likely an issue of "L'Écho des Mystères," focuses on a compilation of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) sightings reported in France during 1979. The content consists of detailed case reports, each assigned a unique identifier (e.g., F/98/88790424), detailing the date, location, witnesses, investigators, and descriptions of the observed phenomena. The magazine appears to be a specialized publication dedicated to investigating and documenting such events.

Detailed Case Reports

Mossoux Region (April 24, 1979): A farmer and his family observed several lights resembling 'tracer bullets' in the sky. The lights were divided into two groups: one with four red, slightly oval balls moving north, and another with five elements (three red, two green) moving west. They left behind a 'haze' of grey or white. The sky was cloudy with scattered stars. An airplane was heard afterward. The case was reported in the local press and investigated by the gendarmerie.

Epinal Region (July 3, 1979): A welder observed two distinct luminous effects within a three-minute interval. The first was a non-uniform white circle, similar to a firecracker burst, lasting about one second. The second was a rapid, incandescent streak, described as a 'kick in the embers,' also lasting about one second. The witness stated he was not interested in UFOs.

Val-d'Ajol Region (August 7, 1979): Members of the CVLDLN observed a phenomenon in the Cassiopeia constellation, initially mistaken for a variable artificial satellite. At 22:56, a luminous point appeared in the northeast, moving rapidly and increasing in brightness, leaving a persistent trail. The object's apparent size increased, which some witnesses attributed to an optical effect.

Cornimont Region (October 20, 1979): A retired man observed a luminous form, described as a flattened sphere or 'bowl,' brighter than the full moon. It was located about 300m away and moved slowly, descending along a mountainside before ascending vertically and disappearing towards the southeast. The witness estimated its speed at about 20 km/h. Other observations were reported in the region the following day.

La Bresse Region (October 20, 1979): A woman observed a flashing light of abnormal aspect through her window, appearing distant.

Cornimont Region (October 20, 1979): A man walking his dog observed a silent light moving from west to east at an estimated altitude below 1000m. It consisted of two regular blinking lights that became asynchronous and changed color from electric to pale blue and violet. The phenomenon exhibited abrupt and irregular changes in direction and speed, stopping momentarily. The witness used binoculars and alerted others. The object moved south, then described a jerky, saccadic trajectory with vertical 'jumps' before disappearing towards Saulxures-sur-Moselotte/Baudimont. No sound was perceived.

Masevaux Region (October 20, 1979): A forest district chief observed a matte orange light moving rapidly from northwest to southeast at a high altitude. It was accompanied by a blue-tinged violet trail and suddenly executed a sharp turn, reversing direction. The observation lasted only a few seconds. The witness reported the event to the gendarmerie and the Bâle-Mulhouse aerodrome. Perturbations in German radio-television emissions were later reported.

Cornimont Region (October 26, 1979): An investigator from CVLDLN visited the site of previous observations from October 20th. Despite searching, no clues were found. Later that evening, a witness reported seeing a luminous ball again, but it had disappeared upon the investigator's arrival.

Epinal Region (Late October 1979): Two witnesses observed a luminous 'star' that initially moved in a straight line before abruptly changing direction and accelerating brutally four times. The observation lasted about four seconds.

Igney Region (November 11, 1979): A witness observed a white light, comparable in size and brilliance to a satellite, moving sinusoidally from left to right, then disappearing into a cloudy band.

Epinal Region (November 14, 1979): Two luminous forms, described as resembling a 'dragée' or a 'swollen cigar,' moved south to north at an apparently supersonic speed, at an altitude not exceeding 2000m. They were pinkish-white, very luminous, with precise contours, and disappeared rapidly, leaving a trace of smoke. The observation lasted about 50 seconds.

Epinal Region (November 14, 1979): At 'Plateau de la Vierge,' two oval luminous forms, described as 'small whitish clouds in the shape of cigars,' appeared high in the sky. They moved south to north, stopped, and then disappeared rapidly. A third blinking light, identified as an airplane, was also observed.

Epinal Region (November 14, 1979): A witness observed two luminous 'objects' near the old hospital. Before their appearance, two violent explosions were heard. The objects were observed for two to three seconds before disappearing suddenly.

Epinal Region (November 14, 1979): A 10-year-old boy and his mother saw a white, not very luminous ball, followed by two airplanes. As the airplanes approached, a strong explosion occurred, and the ball disappeared rapidly towards Thaon, leaving a white trail. The observation lasted less than 20 seconds. The mother refused to make a statement.

Epinal Region (November 14, 1979): A 16-year-old girl observed two orange luminous balls that described similar but inverted trajectories before rejoining and disappearing side-by-side. This lasted 5-6 seconds. Later, she observed two identical balls again, with rectilinear trajectories until their 'junction,' lasting about 3 seconds.

Epinal Region (November 14, 1979): A resident observed a strong white light, intensely bright, located about 300-400m above trees. The light appeared and disappeared at regular intervals of 5 to 10 minutes for about an hour.

Dompaire Region (November 14, 1979): A witness described a 'jet of light' that blinked rapidly, changing between green and orange, and remained stationary high in the sky, heading west.

Dompaire Region (November 14, 1979): A driver observed two immobile orange balls in the sky, estimated to be about 6mm in diameter at arm's length. They crossed the road, stopped, and then moved towards Epinal, becoming white and blinking. The phenomenon disappeared towards Darnieulles.

Girmont Region (November 14, 1979): Two luminous points, described as important and red with an orange halo, were observed. One seemed fixed, while the second moved rapidly towards the first and merged into it. No sound was perceived, and the car radio functioned normally. A detection center reported no detected activity.

Fays Region (November 25, 1979): An oval, green, immobile object was observed for over 45 minutes. Its diameter varied between 12 and 25 cm at arm's length. The gendarmerie investigated.

Fays Region (November 26 or 27, 1979): The same witness, accompanied by his nephew and sister, observed an immobile 'cigar' shaped object, greenish and extremely bright, for about half an hour.

Fays Region (November 28, 1979): The witness observed a brilliant green ovoid object moving very low, less than 100m from him, followed by a white 'drape' twice its length. Afterward, an unpleasant acidic odor was noted. Later, a yellow-orange 'star' emitted an curved flash.

Epinal Region (November 29, 1979): A luminous 'object,' the size of a star, which seemed to emit flashes, remained immobile for five minutes before moving slowly and disappearing.

Viménil Region (November 29, 1979): A couple observed a luminous 'object' surrounded by reddish halos, moving with jerky movements. The distance was estimated at over 3km. The object resembled a bright helicopter image hovering.

Corcieux Region (December 2, 1979): A strange light, oscillating between fiery red and orange, described as a 'neon tube,' was observed at about 1 km altitude. It remained stationary for two to three minutes.

Lanobre Region (Date not specified, but likely late 1979): Witnesses observed a light that moved rectilinearly. Its color was pale, and it disappeared over the horizon in less than ten seconds. The phenomenon traversed the sky, passing in front of the Big Dipper. Its color was described as diffuse blue by one witness and yellow-cream by another.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this compilation are the diverse visual characteristics of the observed phenomena (shape, color, size, movement) and the consistency of witness reports across different regions and dates. The publication appears to adopt a neutral, investigative stance, meticulously recording witness accounts and noting the involvement of official bodies like the gendarmerie. The emphasis is on presenting the raw data of sightings, allowing readers to draw their own conclusions. The detailed case files, including investigator names and specific times, suggest a systematic approach to documenting these events. The presence of multiple sightings on the same dates in different locations hints at potential coordinated or widespread phenomena. The publication seems to aim at providing a comprehensive record of UAP activity in France during 1979.

This document, titled "ENQUETES" (Inquiries/Investigations), is a French publication dated October 1, 1980. It functions as a form or newsletter for a UFO investigation group, likely the "CERCLE VOSGIEN" (Vosges Circle).

Key Personnel and Contact Information

The publication lists Gilles MUNSCH as the "Responsable" (Responsible person) with an address in Cornimont (10, rue Charlemagne N° 27, 88310) and a telephone number (61-43-88). An alternative address for Mr. MUNSCH is provided for Remiremont (Appt 138, Tour de Neuvillers, le grand Rhumont, 88200), noted as "Toujours valable" (Always valid).

Jean-Marc PARMENTELAT is listed as the "Suppléant" (Substitute/Deputy) with an address in Epinal (8, rue de la 2ème D.B, 88000).

Call to Action and Networking

A significant part of the document encourages readers to "Multipliez vos chances d'observation! Rejoignez le Réseau National téléphonique ARIANE de L.D.L.N." (Multiply your observation chances! Join the ARIANE National Telephone Network of L.D.L.N.). This suggests a network for reporting and discussing UFO sightings.

Rebus Puzzle and Support

The document features a "RÉBUS" (rebus puzzle) with various symbols and letters, including "L'", "ZU", "goi", a depiction of a UFO, "CE", a mountain with a figure, "POUR", "DU 88", a house, a dice, "vous A", a heart symbol, "LE", a circle, "H", a drawing of people looking up at the sky, "L'", a car, "42 MOIS", "DU", and "F.".

Below the rebus, a "SOLUTION" is provided: "Les U.F.O. n'ont pas de secret pour les membres du CERCLE VOSGIEN." (UFOs hold no secrets for the members of the VOSGES CIRCLE.) This is followed by a call to action: "Aidez nous à faire vivre le cercle en achetant l'autocollant: 5,00F" (Help us keep the circle alive by buying the sticker: 5.00F).

Document Type and Themes

This document is not a typical magazine issue but rather a form or flyer related to a UFO investigation group. The primary themes are UFO investigation, networking, and community support.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The editorial stance is clearly pro-UFO investigation and community engagement. The "CERCLE VOSGIEN" positions itself as knowledgeable about UFOs and seeks active participation and financial support from its members and the public. The emphasis on a telephone network suggests a desire for rapid information sharing and a structured approach to collecting observation data.