LDLN - No 263-264

Magazine Overview

This issue of "LUMIÈRES DANS LA NUIT" (Lights in the Night), dated May-June 1986, is the 29th year of publication and issue number 263-264. The cover headline proclaims "MYSTERIEUX OBJETS CELESTES ET PROBLEMES CONNEXES" (Mysterious Celestial Objects and Related Problems). The magazine is published in France and is dedicated to the passionate search for truth regarding unexplained phenomena.

Article 1: "... Jusqu'où ne pas aller trop loin !" Reflections on Conclusions from the Years of Hope in Ufology by Gilbert Cornu

This lengthy article reflects on the history and evolution of ufology, particularly during what the author terms the "years of hope." Cornu, co-authoring with Monsieur Chaloupek, aims to recall significant UFO cases from that period, presenting them chronologically. He acknowledges that while rigor was not the primary goal, historical truth was considered, and dubious cases were flagged. The author emphasizes that the immediate impact and perception of a case at the time of its occurrence are historically significant, even if it is later revealed to be a hoax, drawing a parallel to the Ems Dispatch incident.

Cornu criticizes certain contemporary ufological trends, particularly the "loufoquerie" (absurdity) of "confidential documents" disseminated by groups with unclear motives. He references Jacques Vallée's alarmist book, suggesting it aims to clarify the situation. The author laments that ufology has become a chaotic "auberge espagnole" (Spanish inn) where various, often conflicting, viewpoints exist.

He categorizes different types of ufologists: the "Monsieur Tout-le-monde" who are influenced by media and science fiction, leading to a distorted perception of UFOs; the "typically Parisian" salon ufologists who engage in gossip rather than serious research; and the "brave and genuine" provincial ufologists who, while dedicated, may lack critical analysis. Cornu also highlights serious ufological groups that meticulously re-examine cases, citing the Cergy-Pontoise case as an example of a mystification that fooled the media. He also praises groups cataloging regional UFO sightings, emphasizing the urgency of interviewing older witnesses.

Cornu expresses concern about a new wave of "iconoclasts" within ufology who engage in "hyper-criticism" based on rationalist principles, often discrediting witnesses and cases without sufficient proof. He argues that this approach, by trying to fit phenomena into pre-defined rational frameworks, misses the true nature of the UFO problem. He provides examples of cases being dismissed based on rumors about witnesses' personal lives, such as the Trénal and the Renève priest cases, arguing that such insinuations are damaging and lack evidentiary value.

He concludes that while the UFO phenomenon is complex and often irrational by human standards, it is important to avoid excessive skepticism and to analyze cases critically, relying on evidence rather than unsubstantiated claims. He suggests that the current state of ufology is difficult but not hopeless, and that a clearer understanding requires looking at the broader historical context and avoiding the pitfalls of sensationalism and unfounded dismissal.

Article 2: "Nuts-and-boltique" et "Papouisme" by Charles Gouiran

This article delves into the question of extraterrestrial life and the nature of UFOs. Gouiran begins by discussing the scientific perspective on the formation of life, noting that early scientific consensus was that life was unique to Earth due to the specific conditions required. However, he references experiments like Stanley Miller's, which demonstrated the possibility of forming organic molecules under simulated early Earth conditions, suggesting that the building blocks of life might be common in the universe.

He then touches upon astronomical concepts, explaining the Earth-Moon system's orbit around a common center of gravity and how this applies to other star systems. Gouiran discusses Laplace's theory that stars form planetary systems and how the rotation of stars can indicate the presence of planets. He highlights that most stars exhibit slow rotation, suggesting they possess planetary systems.

The article then returns to the conditions for life's appearance, noting the complexity involved but also the positive results of experiments that vary energy sources and atmospheric compositions, consistently yielding organic compounds. This suggests that life might be a common phenomenon throughout the cosmos.

Gouiran addresses the "nuts-and-bolts" versus "Papouisme" (or spiritual/non-physical) debate in ufology. He criticizes those who dismiss physical UFOs and extraterrestrial visitors, labeling them "nuts-and-bolts" proponents. He argues that this reductionist approach fails to account for the alleged characteristics of UFOs, such as their ability to change shape, penetrate objects, and disappear instantly. He suggests that a truly rational approach in the future might be able to explain these phenomena, implying that current rationalism is insufficient.

The author also discusses the vastness of the universe and the potential for life on numerous planets, citing calculations by Pierre Guérin and Carl Sagan. He explores the concept of time dilation due to relativistic speeds, suggesting that interstellar travel might be feasible within a human lifetime. He also touches upon the speculative idea of "black holes" as potential shortcuts through spacetime, possibly used by advanced civilizations.

Gouiran questions the human tendency to view advanced technology as magic, using the example of indigenous peoples' reactions to modern technology. He argues that if a few decades' technological gap can create such a perception, then the gap between human civilization and that of advanced extraterrestrials could be immense, making their technology appear magical.

He concludes by emphasizing that the universe is likely teeming with life, and that humanity may be only partially evolved compared to potential extraterrestrial civilizations. He advocates for a more open-minded approach to ufology, one that considers the possibility of advanced physical craft and beings, rather than dismissing them outright based on current scientific limitations.

Other Content

The issue also includes sections on "Elements useful to the observer and investigator" (providing tables for estimating distances and calculating horizon distance), a "Francat Catalogue of close encounters in France (Listing 800 - 1982) (Part 5)" listing numerous sightings with dates, locations, and credibility assessments, and a section on "Our Activities" detailing reader services, research initiatives, and archival efforts. There is also a note on the magazine's editorial line, emphasizing constructive debate and avoiding personal attacks.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently promotes a rigorous, evidence-based approach to ufology, while also acknowledging the limitations of current scientific understanding and the potential for phenomena to appear irrational. There is a clear stance against unsubstantiated claims and sensationalism, advocating for careful investigation and critical analysis. The editorial line emphasizes open-mindedness and constructive debate, encouraging readers to contribute their observations and research. The issue reflects a concern about the fragmentation and internal conflicts within the ufological community, urging for a more unified and rational approach to understanding the UFO phenomenon.

This issue of "L'Écho des OVNI" (The Echo of UFOs), published in 1985 as issue number 25, is a French magazine dedicated to the investigation and reporting of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). The cover features a headline about a sighting near Mauriac (Cantal) and includes a photographic montage with a map inset. The magazine's price is listed as 25 French Francs.

Key Articles and Reports

Près de Mauriac (Cantal)

This detailed report, investigated by Christian Caudy, describes an encounter on August 15, 1984, near Momanange, Cantal. Witnesses Marie-Sylvie Périé and Eric Borie observed three luminous yellow-orange rectangular panels, inclined inwards to form a pyramid shape, with a series of red lights above. The phenomenon was immobile and silent. The report notes the proximity to a fish pond and the Mars river, suggesting a possible correlation between UAPs and water bodies. The witnesses were not harmed, but were frightened. The tracto-pelle belonging to M. Hébert, a pisciculturist, experienced battery discharge after the event, which later resolved itself.

Investigations and Case Files

The magazine presents a comprehensive catalog of UAP sightings, primarily from France, with detailed entries for each case. These entries include:

• Case Number: Sequential numbering (e.g., 958, 959, etc.)
• Date and Time: Specific date and time of observation.
• Location: Town, department, and sometimes coordinates.
• Duration: Length of the observation.
• Type: Classification of the sighting (e.g., 'CE1' for close encounter, 'CE2' for aerial object, 'CE3' for humanoid).
• Witness(es): Name(s), profession(s), age(s), and sex.
• Direction and Displacement: Direction of observation and movement of the object.
• Distance: Estimated distance from the witness.
• Shape and Color: Description of the object's form and hue.
• Apparent Dimension: Estimated size in the sky.
• Altitude: Estimated height.
• Evolution: Description of the object's movement and behavior.
• Environment: Description of the surroundings.
• Weather Conditions: Meteorological details.
• Brief Account (Récit bref): A summary of the witness's experience.
• Source of Information: How the case was reported (e.g., newspaper, investigator, direct witness).
• Investigator(s): Name(s) of the individuals who compiled the report.

Notable cases detailed include sightings in Feignies, Coudekerque-Branche, Guipavas, Ingré, Darney, Petit-Landau, Habsheim, Laxou, Grandval, Tours-sur-Meymont, Saint-Hilaire de Lusignan, Buzet-sur-Baïse, Bourdettes, Nay, Sommerécourt, Sainte Anne sur Gervonde, Le Luc, Toulon, Villeneuve-sur-Lot, Valensole, Saint-Souplet, Plouay, Xanton et Chassenon, Nantes, Lucerat, Jonzac, Flavigny-sur-Ozerain, Berru, Neuilly-sur-Suize, Montlandon, Gâvres, Darmannes, Royère, Bourganeuf, Menton, Laubressel, Saint-Cirgue de Malbert, Plestan, Ferrières sur Sichon, Lessay, Brazis, Lavour, Méditerranée, Chouvigny, Cannes-la-Bocca, Outreau, and many others across various French regions.

Special Reports and Features

• "Apparitions Mariales ou Apparitions d'Humanoïdes?": This section discusses cases related to Marian apparitions or humanoid sightings, specifically focusing on "Bouxieres-aux-Dames."
• "Années Non Connues": A table listing UAP cases from unknown years.
• "Répartition Annuelle du Nombre de Cas de RR3 en France": A statistical breakdown of 'Rencontre Rapprochée' (Close Encounter) cases in France by year, from 1950 to 1984, showing the number of cases categorized by 'B' (Bons - Good), 'NI' (Non Identifiés - Unidentified), 'RS' (Renseignements Succints - Succinct Information), 'P' (Presse - Press), 'E' (Élucidé - Elucidated), 'TD' (Très Douteux - Very Doubtful), and 'D' (Douteux - Doubtful).
• "Hors Classement": A section for cases that do not fit into standard chronological or categorized lists, including those from pre-1950s and specific dates like 25.02.1974.
• "Lumières dans la Nuit": An appeal from the LDLN Surveillance Network for new subscribers and collaborators, outlining their activities such as night vigils and experimental research.
• "Enquête de Joël Ambiehl, Daniel Cortese, et Christine Possner": A report on a sighting in Wittelsheim (Haut-Rhin) on December 11, 1980, involving a bright, constant yellow-orange light observed by a family.
• "Enquête de Joël Ambiehl": A report on a sighting near Langres (Haute Marne) on August 11, 1982, involving a luminous ball observed by Mr. F.J.
• "Palmarès des observations dans l'Eure (3 - Suite et fin)": Continues a series of UAP reports from the Eure department, detailing sightings in Gravigny, Brosville, Les Andelys, and other locations.
• "Palmarès": Further reports from the Eure department, including cases in St André de l'Eure, Pinterville, Manneville-le-Réoult, and Orgeville.
• "Source d'informations: enquêteur ami du témoin": A note indicating that some information was provided by an investigator's friend.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently emphasizes the importance of detailed, objective reporting and investigation of UAP phenomena. There is a clear effort to collect and catalog sightings systematically, providing extensive data for each case. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, encouraging scientific study while acknowledging the challenges of classification and verification. The publication highlights the role of witness testimony, investigator reports, and media coverage in documenting these events. The recurring theme of UAPs being observed near water bodies is also noted, suggesting a potential area for further research. The magazine also includes statistical analyses and appeals for reader participation, indicating a community-driven approach to UAP research.

This issue of "Lumières dans la Nuit" presents the second part of a retrospective catalog of UFO cases from 1954 in the Vosges region of France, titled "Catalogue rétroactif 1954 des cas vosgiens (2 - suite)". The magazine focuses on detailed accounts of sightings, providing witness testimonies, dates, times, and locations, often referencing local press articles as sources.

Case Studies from 1954

The catalog meticulously documents numerous sightings, categorizing them by case number and date. The cases span September and October 1954, with a few extending into late October and early November.

Case 13 (September 5, 1954, Gerardmer): Paul and Micheline D. observed a strange, ash-grey object resembling a cigar or a part of the Milky Way for nearly half an hour. Luminous points, like slow-moving shooting stars, emanated from it. The object made no sound and showed no change in color. Claude Fleurance's note indicates Micheline D. was reluctant to discuss the observation due to the distant memory and lack of interest.

Case 14 (September 19, 1954, Epinal): Jacques Toilot, a 14-year-old, reported seeing a "saucer like Saturn" on the evening of September 19th. He described it as a large, yellow sphere surrounded by a pale yellow halo, moving at high speed towards the castle. He firmly stated he saw it for about a minute before it disappeared.

Case 15 (Late September 1954, Raon l'Etape): Notables of the town reported a flying saucer evolving above the 'côte de REPY'. A photo was reportedly taken, but its result was not communicated to the press. The article notes that there was no follow-up in the press.

Case 16 (October 1, 1954, Saint-Michel-sur-Meurthe): Paul Cloarec and René Mathis witnessed a flying saucer between 8:30 PM and 8:45 PM. Cloarec described it as an elongated oval shape with bright white lights that flickered like arc welding. The object moved silently towards the north and disappeared. The phenomenon was reportedly repeating at a fixed hour for several days.

Case 17 (October 3, 1954, Remiremont): Around 100 people observed what they believed to be a flying saucer in the Champ de Mars exhibition area. It left a trail of smoke and moved in a circular pattern around the sun before disappearing after about ten minutes.

Case 18 (October 16, 1954, Bouxurulles): Mme Céline Voirin reported seeing a large luminous ball moving rapidly, leaving a luminous trail. She expressed concern that her family did not believe her and worried if others had the same experience.

Case 19 (October 16, 1954, Racecourt): A farmer and his family observed a red object moving at high speed towards the west, described as larger than a football and different from a shooting star.

Case 20 (October 16, 1954, Bruyeres): M. MOUGELLE and M. FEINTRENIE reported seeing a disc with green and red reflections moving at high speed, leaving a similar trail.

Case 21 (October 18, 1954, La Bure): Mlle Thérèse Grandemange and Mlle Claudine Leconte observed a mysterious object described as a small sun, which moved at high speed, changed colors, and hovered for about fifteen minutes. Several other people, including M. Rémy Marcel, also witnessed the phenomenon.

Case 22 (October 18, 1954, Velotte): M. Wucherier saw a fireball moving across the sky, emitting blue, white, red, and orange lights.

Case 23 (October 20, 1954, Saint-Remy): Louis Ujvari, a former legionnaire, reported a close encounter with a humanoid figure and a landed flying saucer. The figure, speaking an unknown language, questioned Ujvari about locations and time before Ujvari was instructed to move on. The saucer was described as two large plates joined together with a dome and antenna, making a whistling noise as it ascended vertically and disappeared.

Case 24 (October 21, 1954, Adoncourt/Giranourt): Dozens of people reported seeing a flying cigar at the Giranourt train station. It was described as a cylindrical object in a vertical position, appearing to be multi-colored (red, yellow, blue, orange) and moving silently towards Dompaire.

Case 25 (October 27, 1954, Moussey): Guy Cuvillier, 13, and his mother reported seeing a circular object, about 4-5 meters in diameter, landed in a field. A red light suddenly rose from it. Triangular traces were found on the ground, and the dog became agitated.

Case 26 (October 29, 1954, Epinal / Saint-Laurent): M. Albert Pochon and M. Ernest Frenot observed a "small sun" with a luminous white trail, moving at high speed in an elliptical trajectory around the Saint-Laurent church steeple. The phenomenon lasted five minutes, and the trail persisted for four minutes.

Other Sections

Catalogue des observations en Seine-Maritime: This section announces a 130-page catalog of observations compiled by the LDLN group over six years in the Seine-Maritime department, available for 53 Francs.

Information reçue par F. Lagarde - Que se passe-t-il à Castelmauroux? (Hte Garonne): This section details phenomena occurring in Castelmauroux since February 1986, including whistling sounds, four ground-directed flames, and flashes of light. Associated phenomena include agitated dogs, chickens laying shell-less eggs, and sheep deaths, though a direct correlation was not established.

Le Forum de nos Lecteurs: This section features reader questions and responses.

• Question 24: Asks for information regarding the use of shape and direction to produce energy, referencing "Les Anciens Astronautes".
• Question 25: Seeks information on the deaths of Professor Morris K. Jessup and physicist James E. Mac Donald, suggesting their deaths might be related to their research on UFOs.
• Question 26: Inquires about "the man" with a black pearl on his forehead.
• Response to Question 20 (Uri Geller): Discusses Uri Geller's career, suggesting he was a victim of his ambition and potentially a fabricator, citing his involvement in psi-spectacles and alleged fraud during scientific tests.

Livre lu - "Carnac, légendes, traditions, coutumes et contes du pays": This section reviews a book by Zacharie Le Rouzic, highlighting its folklore content and mentioning "PAOTRED" (entities believed to guard places) and their potential connection to UFO phenomena.

Sur la route des vacances n'oubliez pas votre MACARON L.D.L.N.: An advertisement for a LDLN badge.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout this issue is the systematic cataloging and investigation of UFO sightings. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious inquiry, aiming to collect and verify data from various sources, including witness accounts and local press. The magazine encourages reader participation through its "Forum de nos Lecteurs" section, seeking to build a comprehensive understanding of the UFO phenomenon. There is a clear emphasis on factual reporting and the pursuit of reliable information, even when dealing with potentially controversial or difficult-to-verify cases like the humanoid encounter or the deaths of researchers.