La Nave de los Locos - No 36

Magazine Overview

This document is the final issue, Number 36, of the magazine "LA NAVE DE LOS LOCOS" (The Ship of the Fools), dated October 2006. It marks the end of the publication's 7-year run. The magazine is dedicated to a rational debate on ufology, parapsychology, and other related topics.

Editorial

The editorial, titled "ESO ES TODO, AMIGOS," is written by Diego Zúñiga, the editor. He reflects on the magazine's delayed publication schedule, admitting that the October date is inaccurate given the September promise and the original July publication plan. Zúñiga explains that the time required for production has increased, making it difficult to meet deadlines amidst other commitments. He recalls past discussions with co-director Sergio Sánchez about reaching a certain number of issues, a goal that now seems ambitious. Several planned special issues, like those on the Valdés case, ufology's absurdities, astroarchaeology, and abductions, are mentioned as being stored on computer, while others were lost to a virus. Zúñiga recounts a memory of brainstorming new ideas for the magazine during a torrential rainstorm in Santiago. He describes the magazine's financial situation as a "scandal," with permanent losses that they eventually stopped tracking. Despite the challenges, Zúñiga expresses sadness at the closure but hopes the effort will contribute to new initiatives promoting critical thinking and doubt. He likens 'La Nave' to a "spoiled child" that deserves full attention, and since he can no longer provide that, he chooses to let it go peacefully, believing its mission has been fulfilled. He acknowledges that the skeptical community might not have welcomed the magazine due to its focus on ufology, a field many skeptics prefer to avoid, but he does not regret the work.

Articles and Contributions

Several authors contribute to this farewell issue:

• "La Nave, esa aventura..." by Sergio Sánchez R.: Sánchez describes the decision to end the magazine as difficult but necessary. He notes that producing each issue became increasingly challenging due to lack of time and excessive workload. The initial gratifications faded, leaving only costs. He reflects on the magazine's journey, the friendships made, and the shift in his own interests away from ufology towards more everyday concerns. He expresses pride in the magazine's role in promoting critical thinking and doubt, and hopes its legacy will inspire future initiatives. He concludes by stating that he is not bored by 'La Nave' itself, but by the lack of time to dedicate to it properly.

• "UNA NAVE QUE ME TRAJO MUY BUENOS AMIGOS" by Luis Ruiz Noguez (Mexico): Noguez humorously refers to Diego Zúñiga as a "contreras" (contrary one) for ending 'La Nave de los Locos', which he considers the best critical ufology magazine in Latin America, surpassing his own 'Perspectivas Ufológicas'. He recounts his initial contact with Sergio Sánchez in 1998 and his subsequent collaboration. He praises Sergio's critical thinking and human quality, citing his work "Pasaporte a ovnilandia" as impressive. Noguez also mentions receiving copies of 'La Nave' from Diego's mother in Mexico City, finding it a pleasant surprise and a continuation of 'Perspectivas Ufológicas'. He describes Diego Zúñiga as a "crazy" fan of his work, who was deeply influenced by his books on extraterrestrials.

• "RUMBO A LA HISTORIA" by Rodolpho Gauthier (Brazil): Gauthier met Diego Zúñiga in 2004 and appreciated 'La Nave's critical stance towards believing ufologists. He notes that 'La Nave' has influenced his own work, particularly his university thesis on the history of Brazilian ufology. He highlights the magazine's emphasis on critical thinking, humor, and the rejection of easy answers as its lasting legacy.

• "Y LA NAVE... VA" by Alejandro Agostinelli (Argentina): Agostinelli, a journalist, shares nostalgic memories of his early ufological investigations in Chile, including the case of Corporal Armando Valdés in 1993. He recalls meeting Sergio Sánchez in 1996 and later Diego Zúñiga, who he describes as a "youngster" at the time. He recounts conversations with Sergio and their shared interest in reviewing cases like the Putre incident. Agostinelli praises 'La Nave' for its critical approach, its coverage of topics like the Psycho-Social Hypothesis, and its publication of dense works by authors like Martin Kottmeyer and Pierre Lagrange. He sees the magazine as a vital resource for ufologists without a platform and a nightmare for charlatans. He notes that while the magazine is ending, the ideas and people involved have transformed, not disappeared.

• "CUESTIONARIO DE AVISTAMIENTOS INCUESTIONABLES" (Questionnaire on Unquestionable Sightings): This section presents a detailed questionnaire filled out by an anonymous observer from Barcelona, Spain, who reports multiple sightings of a UFO starting in 2000. The object is described as lenticular square, rectangular, small externally, and made of fibrous material. It appeared in black and white, illuminating without emitting light. The observer reported seeing two humanoids, identified as Diego and Sergio, on the first occasions. The observer also claims to have visited the nave and communicated with its occupants.

• Other contributions include pieces by Manuel Borraz, Luis González, Diego Viegas, Luis Alfonso Gámez, César Parra, Matías Morey, Kentaro Mori, Manuel Carballal, Patricio Abusleme, Rubén Morales, Luis Eduardo Pacheco, Marcos González, Sixto Paz, Eric McMillan, and Marcelo Moya, covering various aspects of ufology, skepticism, and personal reflections on the magazine's impact.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The overarching theme of "La Nave de los Locos" is the promotion of rational debate and critical thinking within the field of ufology. The magazine consistently challenged unsubstantiated claims and charlatanism, advocating for a skeptical yet open-minded approach. The farewell issue emphasizes the importance of critical analysis, doubt, and the pursuit of truth, even in the face of financial difficulties and the inherent challenges of the subject matter. The editorial stance is one of intellectual rigor and a commitment to providing a platform for serious discussion, distinct from sensationalism or blind belief.

Title: La Nave de los Locos
Issue: 36
Date: October 2006
Type: Magazine issue

This issue of "La Nave de los Locos" (Issue #36, October 2006) marks the apparent conclusion of this Chilean publication after nearly seven years of operation. The magazine was dedicated to the critical and rational examination of ufology and paranormal phenomena, often challenging pseudoscientific claims and exposing frauds.

Editorial and Contributions

The issue features a collection of reflections and farewells from various contributors who have been associated with "La Nave de los Locos." The overarching theme is the magazine's significant impact on the field of ufology in Chile and Latin America, particularly its role in promoting skepticism and critical thinking.

Luis R. González M. reflects on his six-year involvement with the publication, likening it to joining a band of pirates navigating the "ocean of pseudoscience" under the banner of rationality. He highlights their "attack on Friendship Island" and their role in bringing the work of American ufologist Martin S. Kottmeyer to a Spanish-speaking audience. He also mentions collaborations with Milton Hourcade and his personal connection with editor Diego Zúñiga and "comodoro" Sergio Sánchez. González emphasizes the ephemeral nature of skepticism in public discourse, noting that while personal efforts to promote it may be limited by daily life, the spirit remains alive.

Diego Rodolfo Viegas (Argentina) laments the departure of "La Nave de los Locos," comparing it to the previous loss of "Ufo Press" and "Ufología Racional." He recalls his initial empathy with the publication, which he saw as a vital medium for an alternative, rational, and differentiated view of anomalous phenomena after the "neoliberal nineties." He praises "La Nave" for synthesizing this new perspective and for its coverage of topics like abductions, classic cases, the Belgian wave, and skeptical investigations. Viegas recounts an unfinished article he intended for "La Nave" concerning the connection between cattle mutilations in Argentina in 2002 and a popular awakening to the threat of foreign financial power, linking it to indigenous symbols and UFO sightings. He congratulates the editors for their work and expresses hope for future editorial ventures.

Luis Alfonso Gámez (Spain) describes the courage required to sustain a critical magazine on ufology, especially given the damage to the field's credibility from events like Roswell and the abduction phenomenon. He notes that "La Nave" ceases publication 40 years after the Betty and Barney Hill case, a pivotal moment in ufology. Gámez shares his personal experience of feeling orphaned after the disappearance of "Ufo Press" and his eventual subscription to "La Nave" due to its web content. He praises the magazine for its quality, humor, and for providing a platform for diverse viewpoints, even those contrary to the editors'. He expresses sadness at its closure but anticipates future collaborations.

César Parra (Chile) recounts his journey into ufology, starting with "Revelación" in 1999. He discovered "La Nave de los Locos" through a link from a discussion about a controversial image of the planet Jupiter captured by the Goes 8 satellite, which was later identified as the Moon. He was impressed by "La Nave's" critical approach and its editors' dedication. Parra details his initial collaboration, including a critique of Manuel Carballal's perceived lack of skepticism, which led to a period of strained relations with Diego Zúñiga. However, a subsequent reconciliation led to a strong friendship. He highlights key moments in their relationship, including an interview with Sergio Sánchez in "Revelación," "La Nave's" support for his book "Guía mágica de Santiago," and a panel discussion with Zúñiga. Parra also mentions his own contributions to the final issues of "La Nave," including an interview with parapsychologist Sergio Schilling.

Matías Morey Ripoll (President of Fundación Anomalía) shares a dreamlike recollection of "La Nave de los Locos," initially mistaking its name. He recalls contributing a review to the magazine about Paolo Toselli's book on urban legends related to the 9/11 attacks. He clarifies that "La Nave" appeared after the event, not before, and discusses the difficulty of explaining the passage of time to non-human entities. He also mentions the magazine's coverage of the Vienna Philharmonic's performance of Strauss and the monoliths in Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" as potential presages.

Manuel Carballal (Spain) reflects on the launch of "La Nave de los Locos" in April 2000 amidst a period of millennial fervor and global events. He describes the magazine's journey as a "crazy" but rational endeavor, navigating the "ocean of mystery" against adverse winds. Carballal emphasizes the immense effort involved in producing an independent, non-commercial publication, including securing collaborations, editing, layout, printing, and distribution, often with personal time and resources. He laments the magazine's disappearance, viewing it as a loss of a "reasonable alternative" to more powerful, commercial publications, and praises its "passion" and "motivation."

Patricio Abusleme (Chile) expresses sadness at the impending closure of "La Nave de los Locos." Despite not being a regular subscriber, he considers it the best ufological medium in Chile and possibly Latin America, praising its quality, diverse contributions, and pluralistic approach. He notes that the magazine opened his mind to new ideas and researchers. Abusleme highlights the professionalism and extensive knowledge of editors Diego Zúñiga and Sergio Sánchez, who he admires greatly. He acknowledges their efforts in denouncing plagiarism and fraud while maintaining a healthy dose of humor, even when facing potential criticism. He concludes by expressing hope for "La Nave's" return in some form, whether print or digital.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the legacy of "La Nave de los Locos," its impact on critical thinking within ufology, and the challenges faced by independent, rational publications. The editorial stance consistently champions skepticism, evidence-based analysis, and a rejection of pseudoscience and charlatanism in the study of anomalous phenomena. The magazine is lauded for its commitment to pluralism, its willingness to publish diverse viewpoints, and its role in fostering a more discerning approach to the unexplained.

Specific Articles and Content

• "¿Efectos físicos en el entorno? ¿Huellas?" and "¿Efectos en la vegetación?": These short Q&A sections address potential physical effects of UFOs or entities, with one respondent noting a lack of physical traces but a possible increase in plant growth, akin to increased watering.
• "¿Desea añadir algo?": A brief section where Manuel Borraz humorously refers to the publication as "the ship of the sane" rather than "the ship of the crazy."
• "ABUNDANTES AVENTURAS..." by Luis R. González M.: A retrospective on his involvement with "La Nave de los Locos."
• "LA NAVE AL HANGAR 18" by Diego Rodolfo Viegas: A farewell to the magazine, reflecting on its importance and his unfinished article.
• "¡ESTOS CHILENOS ESTÁN LOCOS!" by Luis Alfonso Gámez: Gámez's reflections on the magazine's closure and the challenges of ufological journalism.
• "UN POLIZÓN EN LA NAVE" by César Parra: Parra's personal journey with "La Nave," detailing his discovery of the magazine and his evolving relationship with its editors.
• "PESADILLA DE UNA NOCHE DE VERANO (BOREAL)" by Matías Morey Ripoll: A more surreal and dreamlike contribution, touching on themes of memory, time, and the 9/11 attacks.
• "LA ÚLTIMA ALTERNATIVA RAZONABLE" by Manuel Carballal: Carballal's tribute to the magazine's dedication and its role as a rational voice.
• "LA SÁTIRA Y EL ESCARNIO" by Patricio Abusleme: Abusleme's appreciation for the magazine's quality, pluralism, and its editors' professionalism.
• "APUNTES DEL NAVÍO": A section with notes from the editorial team, including apologies for rushed translations, a mention of a cyberattack that lost data, and the magazine's average print run of 100 copies per issue.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue consistently emphasizes the importance of rational inquiry, skepticism, and critical thinking in the field of ufology. "La Nave de los Locos" is presented as a beacon of intellectual honesty, providing a platform for diverse voices and challenging unsubstantiated claims. The magazine's closure is lamented as a significant loss for those seeking a balanced and evidence-based approach to the paranormal. The editors, Diego Zúñiga and Sergio Sánchez, are widely praised for their dedication, professionalism, and commitment to the magazine's mission.

This document is the final issue, number 36, of the Chilean ufology bulletin 'La Nave de los Locos', dated October 2006. It is a 30-page publication that has been edited independently and without profit motives. The issue features a collection of articles, reflections, and interviews that bid farewell to the publication and discuss the state of ufology, skepticism, and the media's role in reporting on paranormal phenomena.

Editorial Content

Farewell and Reflections

The issue opens with reflections on the closure of 'La Nave de los Locos'. Jordi Ardanuy laments the disappearance of print publications like 'La Nave' and 'Papers d'Ovnis', contrasting them with the fragmented and often superficial nature of online blogs. He emphasizes the value of print in fostering conciseness and commitment from authors, and expresses regret over the loss of a publication that provided valuable information and was a source of intellectual engagement.

Rubén Morales also bids farewell, likening the cessation of the publication to the sinking of the Titanic. He highlights 'La Nave's' historical significance in the field of ufology and anticipates that it will be consulted by future students of human sciences, though he also foresees it becoming a mere collectible.

Luis Eduardo Pacheco expresses envy for 'La Nave's' ability to publish, stating it was the kind of magazine he always wanted to create. He credits the publication with influencing his own rational and dispassionate approach to ufology and introducing him to key figures in the field. Pacheco particularly praises the bulletin's HONESTY and HUMOR, noting how humor served as a crucial element in navigating the often-insipid landscape of ufology. He also touches upon the frustration of dealing with 'ufologists' who manipulate information and engage in ad hominem attacks rather than substantive debate.

Marcos González, from Agrupación Canopus, describes 'La Nave's' appearance as a turning point in Chilean ufology, challenging the established pro-ET discourse and promoting critical thinking. He acknowledges the bulletin's role in publishing his early articles and fostering his rational thought process, calling it the 'authentic and unique mother of Chilean critical ufology'.

Critical Perspectives on Ufology

Martín Fragoso contributes an article titled 'UN ENFOQUE DISTINTO CONTRA LOS TRAFICANTES DE MISTERIOS' (A Different Approach Against the Traffickers of Mysteries). He expresses frustration with credulous ufologists who present information selectively, and with those who fail to ask fundamental questions. Fragoso advocates for a different approach to ufology, one that questions charlatans and presents a more critical perspective. He also mentions the possibility of 'Perspectivas' resuming publication and expresses his willingness to collaborate on new projects.

Diego Zúñiga interviews Arturo Gómez, an astronomer who is critical of ufologists. Gómez argues that there is a significant commercial interest within ufology and that many UFO sightings are misinterpretations of natural phenomena. He recounts his childhood experience of mistaking Venus for a UFO and emphasizes the importance of scientific rigor. Gómez also discusses his discovery of a nebula named 'La gran hamburguesa Gómez' and his role in debunking UFO claims in Chile.

Media and Skepticism

Marcos González also reports on Sixto Paz's television appearances in Chile. Paz, a contactee turned ufologist, continues to present his experiences of psychographic communication and his 'Morlen' colony. The article critically examines Paz's 'evidence', such as satellite photographs of alleged large oval objects, suggesting they might be misinterpretations of the Moon. It also discusses the 'thermal UFOs' video from the Gulf of Mexico, which the author suggests were related to oil platform flares. The article concludes that Paz remains popular due to his ability to generate mystery and appeal to television ratings, rather than providing serious information.

Another article by Diego Zúñiga features Hernán Martínez, author of 'Las matanzas de Jehová, el extraterrestre'. Martínez discusses his book, which explores biblical passages in relation to extraterrestrial themes. He recounts his background in boxing and martial arts, and his journey into esotericism. Martínez expresses a critical view of organized religion and states he does not seek followers. He also briefly mentions his challenge to fight Muhammad Ali in 1970.

Practical Advice for Skeptics

Chapter VII, 'ELLOS DICEN, USTED LES RESPONDE' (They Say, You Respond), by Eric McMillan, offers practical advice for skeptics on how to respond to believers in paranormal claims. It provides a guide on how to counter common arguments, such as 'I know it's real because I lived it' or 'Many people have seen it, they can't all be wrong.' The advice emphasizes seeking external evidence and understanding that subjective experiences can lead to perceptual errors. It uses examples like David Copperfield making the Statue of Liberty disappear and historical accounts of people seeing mermaids to illustrate how collective belief does not equate to objective reality.

Specific UFO Cases and Debunking

Arturo Gómez is featured again, discussing his efforts to debunk UFO claims in Chile. He mentions the 'marcianito' case in Parque Forestal, Santiago, which turned out to be a dog, and the alleged UFO sightings in Cajón del Maipo. Gómez reiterates that many UFO phenomena are explainable, citing atmospheric conditions, satellite reflections, and misidentification of celestial bodies like Venus.

The Legacy of 'La Nave de los Locos'

The publication's final pages include acknowledgments and a sense of closure. The editors express their gratitude to collaborators and readers, emphasizing the bulletin's commitment to independent, non-profit publication. The overall tone is one of pride in their work and a hopeful outlook for the future of critical inquiry in ufology, despite the end of their publication.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of ufology, the importance of rational and scientific thinking, the critique of media sensationalism regarding paranormal topics, and the challenges faced by independent publications in the digital age. The editorial stance is clearly skeptical, advocating for evidence-based reasoning and debunking pseudoscientific claims. The publication consistently promotes a rational approach to understanding unexplained phenomena, distinguishing between genuine mystery and misinterpretation or commercial exploitation.

Title: La Nave de los Locos
Issue: 36
Date: October 2006
Content Type: Magazine Issue

Introduction to Skepticism

This section, authored by Eric McMillan, provides a foundational argument for skepticism, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence to support extraordinary claims. McMillan addresses common arguments used by believers, such as the idea that a large volume of anecdotal reports can constitute proof, likening it to collecting many empty bottles and assuming they can't all be empty. He stresses that individual cases should be judged on their own merits.

McMillan distinguishes between phenomena that are genuinely rare but real (like frog rain, which has been scientifically proven) and unsubstantiated claims. He argues that skeptics do not dismiss phenomena as impossible but rather challenge the uncritical acceptance of beliefs. The article debunks the myth that Christopher Columbus proved the Earth was round, stating that its sphericity was accepted knowledge since at least the 3rd century BCE, and Colón's goal was to find a route to the East, which he failed to do.

The author highlights the fallacy of believing that because some great ideas were initially rejected, current rejected ideas must also be great. He also points out that many believers in paranormal phenomena lack specific studies or evidence to support their claims, often resorting to vague statements like 'I heard about it'.

McMillan advocates for a critical approach, urging readers to question the sources of information and the reliability of publications that are not rigorously peer-reviewed. He suggests that when presented with claims of scientific backing, one should press for specific details like publication dates or issue numbers.

The Burden of Proof

The article asserts that the burden of proof lies with the person making the extraordinary claim. It addresses the accusation of being 'closed-minded' by stating that while open-mindedness is important, it should not extend to accepting claims without sufficient evidence. The author suggests a balanced approach: critically evaluating claims but remaining open to new evidence that might change one's beliefs.

McMillan also tackles the misconception that all beliefs are equally valid, distinguishing between the right to hold an opinion and the weight of that opinion based on evidence. He encourages continued dialogue, suggesting that even if immediate conviction isn't achieved, the presented arguments might lead individuals to reconsider their beliefs privately.

Scientific Principles and Misinterpretations

The issue delves into the misapplication of scientific principles by paranormal proponents. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, a concept from quantum mechanics, is discussed. McMillan explains that this principle, which states that one cannot simultaneously know the precise position and momentum of a subatomic particle, is often misused to argue that logic and evidence do not apply to paranormal phenomena. He clarifies that Heisenberg's principle is confined to the subatomic realm and does not extend to macroscopic observations or everyday reasoning.

Albert Einstein is mentioned as having argued against the Principle of Uncertainty. The article also addresses the popular misattribution of the quote "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy" to Shakespeare himself, noting it is from Hamlet and its interpretation can be debated. A quote from Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, "The fault, dear Bruto, is not in our stars, but in ourselves," is offered as a counterpoint to astrological beliefs.

UFOs: The Massive Return (Part II)

This article, by Marcos González of Agrupación Canopus, Chile, details a significant UFO sighting that occurred on October 30, 2005, around 10:30 PM in Viña del Mar, Chile. Rodrigo Garrido, a professional photographer, and his daughter witnessed a bright, silent, and seemingly static white light in the sky, which they initially dismissed as conventional. As they observed, the light began to move slowly.

Garrido then proceeded to take 26 photographs of the phenomenon with his professional camera. One of these photographs was published in El Mercurio de Valparaíso on November 1, 2005. Weeks later, the author visited the witnesses to interview them and inspect the location from which the photos were taken.

The witnesses recounted the events, and the author and his companions were taken to the rooftop where the observation occurred. The article includes images of the phenomenon, described as a bright light that appeared to be a balloon or a similar object, possibly a Chinese lantern, due to its slow movement and the absence of conventional aircraft characteristics. The investigation also touched upon a previous incident from December 1, 2004, involving a student's report of a possible UFO in Viña del Mar.

The article also references an investigation by Larry Robinson into a similar phenomenon involving a bright light and a balloon, suggesting that such sightings can be explained by conventional means, such as hot air balloons or lanterns, especially when combined with atmospheric conditions and photographic limitations.

The Role of Media and Skepticism in UFO Investigations

The article critiques the media's role in sensationalizing UFO cases and highlights the lack of rigorous investigation in many instances, quoting Philip Klass: "Many UFO cases seem enigmatic and inexplicable because those who have investigated them have lacked sufficient rigor." It points out that publications like Fate, Enigmas, and Conozca Más are not considered reliable sources for scientific evidence.

It also touches upon the investigation of a case by Enrique Silva Moyo, director of Agrupación Canopus, who interviewed witnesses and examined photographic evidence. The article suggests that while some UFO cases may appear unusual, they often have rational explanations when investigated thoroughly, contrasting the sensationalist approach with the scientific method.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The overarching theme of this issue is the promotion of critical thinking and skepticism in evaluating extraordinary claims, particularly those related to the paranormal and UFOs. The magazine advocates for evidence-based reasoning, the scientific method, and the debunking of misinformation and logical fallacies. The editorial stance clearly favors a rational and scientific approach to understanding phenomena, encouraging readers to question unsubstantiated beliefs and to demand rigorous proof for any assertion.

Title: LA NAVE DE LOS LOCOS
Issue: 36
Date: October 2006
Country: Chile

This issue of 'La Nave de los Locos' marks a significant point, reflecting on the magazine's journey and the broader landscape of ufology. It features a mix of investigative articles, personal reflections, and book reviews, all within the context of critical analysis and rational debate.

Key Articles and Features

"OVNIS PUBLICITARIOS" by Marcelo Moya

This article debunks a widely reported UFO sighting in Santiago, Chile, on August 11, 2006. Initially, a news report on Chilevisión by Alejandro Guillier announced a UFO sighting, leading to public speculation. However, an investigation by a camera crew revealed the object to be a Duracell advertising blimp. Moya explains the nature of these blimps, their characteristics (approximately 12 meters long, 2.5 meters wide, weighing six kilos, with internal rotors and lights), and how they are operated remotely and regulated by the DGAC. He notes that this form of advertising has been used since the 1920s, evolving to include lights for night visibility. The article highlights how such aerial advertisements, especially when viewed from a distance or under confusing circumstances, can be easily mistaken for UFOs, leading to misinterpretations and fueling the ufology phenomenon. Moya expresses concern that this trend will continue, with more sightings being misinterpreted as UFOs unless researchers educate the public on these new forms of advertising.

"TRES FANTASMAS EN LA TV" (Three Ghosts on TV)

This section chronicles the magazine's appearances on television. The editors of 'La Nave' recount three instances where they were featured:

• Canal: Infinito, May 8, 2001: Diego Zúñiga appeared on the program 'Zona Infinito' to discuss the chupacabras. The segment also involved other contributors like Jorge Alfonso Ramírez and Rubén Morales. Despite the critical approach intended, the host Horacio Embón reportedly called Zúñiga an "incredulous" guest off-air.
• Canal: Mega, July 5, 2001: Sergio Sánchez represented 'La Nave' at an event called "Ovnis animatronics," featuring supposed alien implants. His appearance on the program "Combinado nacional" was brief, lasting only about 13 seconds before the host shifted focus to another guest.
• Canal: Mega, November 22, 2001: Diego Zúñiga and Sergio Sánchez participated in a segment of the investigative program "Aquí en vivo" discussing the paranormal. However, only six seconds of Zúñiga's statement about scientific evidence were aired, with the rest of the program focusing on ghosts and communication with the dead. The recording for the magazine's archive was also of poor quality.

"PREMIO CUADERNOS DE UFOLOGÍA"

The editors of 'La Nave' proudly received the 'Cuadernos de Ufología' award in 2001, recognizing their work in disseminating information about ufology. This award placed them among prestigious publications like Magonia and Anomalía. Two years later, Diego Zúñiga received a special mention from the same foundation for his work on the role of the press in spreading popular beliefs.

"JUSTO RECONOCIMIENTO" (Just Recognition)

This section highlights Cristina González, the primary illustrator for 'La Nave de los Locos'. Her role was crucial in visually representing the magazine's content, including the iconic grey aliens on its covers. The text notes that she worked independently, translating the editors' ideas into masterful artwork, and also contributed to Sergio Sánchez's book "Pasaporte a Ovnilandia".

"SÓLO QUEDAN LOS LOCOS" (Only the Crazy Ones Remain) by Jorge Alfonso Ramírez

Ramírez expresses his sadness at the magazine's final issue, reminiscing about his enjoyment of its content, which blended information with humor. He praises the magazine for its rigorous yet witty approach to ufology and its role in fostering a space for critical thinking. He laments the loss of such a publication in an era dominated by sensationalism and banality, emphasizing the value of 'La Nave' as a unique resource.

Book Reviews:

• "El libro marrón de Dios" (The Brown Book of God) by Ronnie Johanson: This review critiques the book for compiling "incredible verses from the Bible," deeming it unsuitable for dogmatic Christians. The reviewer highlights passages that portray a misogynistic, slavery-approving, and genocidal deity, questioning the humanistic portrayal often associated with Christianity. The review also touches upon Michel Onfray's thesis that Jesus may not have existed, suggesting a historical creation by a figure like Paul of Tarsus.
• "El secreto de los dioses" (The Secret of the Gods) by Manuel Carballal: This review praises Carballal's book as a "delight" for lovers of adventure, past mysteries, and critical analysis of legends. The book is described as a blend of travelogue and investigation, covering diverse locations and debunking pseudoscientific beliefs, particularly in astroarchaeology. It also includes biblical citations that challenge religious dogma. The reviewer notes that Carballal's personal accounts of his volunteer work with the elderly reveal a deeper dimension to his character than his investigative pursuits.

"NO SÉ CUÁNDO VI LA NAVE POR PRIMERA VEZ..." (I Don't Know When I Saw The Ship for the First Time...) by Juan De Gennaro

De Gennaro reflects on his early engagement with 'La Nave de los Locos', starting around late 2002. He highlights the magazine's role in fostering rational debate about ufology and its attention to skepticism. He mentions his incorporation as a collaborator in March 2004. De Gennaro praises the magazine's six-year run, acknowledging the challenges faced, such as discouragement, criticism, and economic pressures, but emphasizes the support from readers and contributors. He describes 'La Nave' as an inclusive and generous project, a valuable repository of information in an era he perceives as the "exhaustion of ufology."

"GRACIAS A LA NAVE" (Thanks to The Ship) by Elizabeth Ramírez

Ramírez expresses her sadness at the magazine's final issue, recalling the blend of information and humor that characterized its content. She thanks the publication for its rigorous information, broad perspective, and for maintaining its stance against skepticism. She believes everyone has a role to play and that 'La Nave' has left a significant legacy.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

Throughout this final issue, the editorial stance of 'La Nave de los Locos' is clear: a commitment to critical thinking, rational analysis, and the debunking of sensationalism, particularly within the field of ufology. The magazine consistently promoted a skeptical yet open-minded approach, encouraging readers to question claims and seek evidence. The articles highlight the importance of media literacy, showing how news reports and popular culture can shape perceptions of unexplained phenomena. The reviews of books by authors like Manuel Carballal and Ronnie Johanson further underscore the magazine's interest in exploring controversial topics from a critical and often iconoclastic perspective. The overall tone is one of intellectual rigor combined with a touch of ironic humor, a hallmark of the publication's identity.