La Nave de los Locos - No 12

Magazine Overview

This issue of "LA NAVE DE LOS LOCOS", number 12, dated November 2001, is dedicated to a comprehensive dossier on UFO abductions, subtitled "Our Daily Bread: Chapter 1: The Cases." The editorial highlights the extensive work of compilation and selection, with the invaluable assistance of Spanish investigator Luis R. González Manso, presenting what is claimed to be the most extensive dossier on abductions ever published in Chile. The magazine aims to offer a critical perspective on the phenomenon, moving beyond the popular accounts of figures like Budd Hopkins, David Jacobs, Raymond Fowler, and John Mack, and exploring diverse theoretical approaches including ethnopsychology, skepticism, and psycho-sociology.

Editorial and Content

The editorial board expresses pride in presenting this special issue, emphasizing its commitment to providing a balanced view of abduction phenomena. They promise to cover a wide range of unpublished or rarely seen works in Spanish, ensuring that followers of ufology will not be disappointed. The magazine intends to present the 'critical face' of the abduction debate, analyzing various theories from Bertrand Méheust's ethnopsychology to Philip Klass's dismantling of claims, Martin Kottmeyer's psycho-sociology, Jenny Randles' agnosticism, Persinger's 'tectonic tension theory,' and John Rimmer's British skepticism. The goal is to allow readers to decide which perspective is most balanced.

The issue also continues with the 'demystifying saga' of Félix Ares de Blas, exploring how modern myths are born and grow, and features ongoing contributions from ufological novelist J. J. Benítez. Regular sections with surprises are also promised.

Key Articles and Cases

"¡Clásicos...! De las abducciones. Los casos que más repercusiones han tenido. Los que moldearon la ufología. Los clásicos, en definitiva."

This section, authored by Diego Zúñiga C., delves into the psychological and sociological aspects of UFO abductions. It introduces the first part of a four-part series that will cover classic abduction cases: Antonio Villas Boas (1957), Betty and Barney Hill (1961), Charles Hickson and Calvin Parker (Pascagoula, 1973), and Travis Walton (1975). The article frames these cases within their historical context and explores prosaic explanations. It notes that abduction stories have evolved, becoming more exotic over time, possibly to maintain reader interest. The Villas Boas case is presented as the entry point for abductions into ufology, initially resisted by ufologists seeking scientific recognition but later widely accepted, sometimes with illogical arguments.

The article draws parallels between modern abduction narratives and older folklore involving demonic or ethereal beings, with extraterrestrials now occupying the role of ancient 'raptors.' It mentions the connection to other popular UFO topics like the Bermuda Triangle and the rise of 'contactees' who received insubstantial messages. The text also includes a critique by Carl Sagan, who ironized about the vague and moralistic answers often provided by alleged extraterrestrials when asked specific, testable questions.

Bertrand Méheust's analysis of abduction stages is discussed: 'incubation' (1947-1966), 'marginal existence' (1966-1973), 'consolidation' (1973-1981), and 'invasion' (1987-present). Key events like the 1975 film "The UFO Incident" and Whitley Strieber's 1987 book "Communion" are cited as milestones. The article suggests that abduction stories have become more sinister, evolving from innocent adolescent fantasies to themes of violation, influenced by societal changes and paranoia, as noted by Nigel Watson and David Sivier.

The author expresses personal skepticism about abduction claims as presented, suggesting that the phenomena might be better explained by 'what's inside' rather than 'what's out there.' The article also points out the lack of anyone claiming Philip Klass's $10,000 reward for proof of alien abduction.

"Toma 1, caso Villas Boas: 'Anoche tuve un sexo de otro mundo'"

This article details the Antonio Villas Boas case, considered a pioneering abduction event. Villas Boas, a 23-year-old Brazilian farmer, reported a sexual encounter with an extraterrestrial female in 1957. The account includes prior sightings of a strange light. The alleged abduction involved being taken aboard a craft, subjected to a procedure involving a transparent liquid, and then having sexual intercourse with a female alien described as beautiful and blonde. The article notes that the case was initially kept secret and later revealed through a letter to the magazine 'O Cruzeiro.' It discusses the potential for the description of the alien to reflect Villas Boas's personal preferences or regional beauty standards. The narrative continues with a second sexual encounter, after which the alien allegedly extracted sperm. The article also touches upon the interpretation of the alien pointing to her belly as indicating pregnancy and Villas Boas's attempt to steal an object from the craft, which led to his discovery and the craft's departure. The encounter lasted approximately four hours.

"Próspera Muñoz: ¿Punto final?"

Authored by José Ruesga, this article examines the Próspera Muñoz case, a significant event in Spanish ufology. Ruesga expresses his personal involvement due to a sense of solidarity with the witness, while disagreeing with the way the case was investigated and publicized. The case gained prominence after Antonio Ribera presented it at a conference and later included it in his book "En el túnel del tiempo." The narrative recounts that Próspera, as a child, along with her sister Ana and uncle, witnessed a bright object land near their home in Jumilla, Murcia, in the summer of 1946 or 1947. Two men entered the house, and after they left, a bright light caused the sisters to lose consciousness. Later, Próspera recalled details of the event, including the presence of a metallic object and advice from visitors. Through hypnosis sessions in 1985, the account evolved into a full abduction narrative, involving a man in a diving suit and a woman with long hair.

The article mentions that the case was debated in "Cuadernos de Ufología," with opinions from various doctors, including Dr. Bueno Ortega and Petit Gancedo.

"LAS MISMAS Y MALDITAS DUDAS DE SIEMPRE"

This section revisits the Villas Boas case, exploring the doubts and criticisms surrounding it. Some Brazilian ufologists, like Claudier Covo and Ademar Gevaerd, suggest the story might be an erotic fantasy, possibly influenced by the close proximity of his brother's bedroom. However, they are criticized for lacking concrete evidence. The article also considers Antonio Ribera's theory that abductees are typically young, strong, and illiterate individuals, a generalization that is challenged by cases like the Hills. The possibility that Villas Boas was a 'repeater' (having seen UFOs before) is also mentioned. Doubts are raised about the consistency of Villas Boas's account and the similarity of the alien woman to the Venusians described by George Adamski. The article notes that the case was initially met with skepticism by organizations like APRO, but later gained traction.

"LA NOVIA ETERNA DE LOS UFÓLOGOS"

This piece speculates on the profound impact of the Villas Boas case on ufologists, suggesting that the detailed account of the sexual encounter with an extraterrestrial woman has influenced many researchers, particularly those who encountered it during their formative years. The author posits that this 'eternal girlfriend' of ufology might represent an unattainable ideal, influencing their lifelong search for similar experiences or beings.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO abductions, the analysis of classic cases, and the critical examination of ufological claims. The magazine adopts a stance that encourages skepticism and a balanced approach, presenting diverse viewpoints and questioning sensationalist narratives. It aims to provide readers with the tools to critically evaluate abduction accounts, contrasting prosaic explanations with more speculative theories. The editorial emphasis is on presenting a 'critical face' of ufology, moving beyond mere acceptance of extraordinary claims and encouraging a rational debate.

This issue of "Dossier Abducciones" is titled "LA NAVE DE LOS LOCOS" (The Ship of Fools) and is dated November 2001. It delves into complex and controversial cases of alleged alien abductions, focusing on the experiences of Próspera Muñoz and the investigation into Jason Andrews by Tony Dodd.

The Case of Próspera Muñoz

The article begins by detailing the initial investigation into Próspera Muñoz's abduction claims, initiated by Rubio Gordo and Manglano, and later taken up by Dr. Bueno Ortega and Antonio Ribera. Próspera's initial accounts were considered by some as unelaborated, leading to skepticism. However, the investigator's commitment to understanding the case, including consulting medical professionals and graphologists, is highlighted. A key event was Próspera's letter dated December 15, 1985, where she described a more detailed experience, including being transported by a "doll-like" figure and another who put her dog to sleep. She recounts entering a large vehicle, described as having a dome and a wing, with a size comparable to a two-story house. Inside, she saw screens displaying surveillance footage of the surroundings and beings operating controls. She was shown images of herself, her dog, and donkey, with a blue halo around them, which the beings explained was the cause of their visits as it allowed them to read their sentiments. Animals, however, did not have this halo. Próspera was then taken to a central staircase leading to a dome, where she ascended via a luminous circle, described as an elevator, to the wing of the craft. She describes a physical examination where she felt nothing, and the beings were surprised by her docility. The beings wore white jumpsuits, and some had transparent helmets. Her hands were noted to have four fingers and interdigital membranes.

Over the years, Próspera's accounts evolved. Initially, the beings were described as "completely normal" with black hair and eyes. Later descriptions became more elaborate, detailing beings of approximately 1.40 to 1.50 meters, wearing white jumpsuits, with very thin faces, large eyes, enormous skulls, and prominent veins. Her husband's drawings, based on her descriptions, are mentioned as a point of comparison. The article notes the increasing complexity and strangeness of her accounts over time, with variations in clothing and equipment described in different encounters.

Próspera's case gained public attention, leading to media appearances and discussions. The article mentions that some of the drawings accompanying her early accounts were not made by her but by her husband, who also expressed doubts about the reliability of tests conducted by his company. The author notes that Próspera has been subjected to constant media pressure, sometimes with the help of popular presenters and investigators like Ribera. Her husband's involvement in ufology also shaped her participation, making it more of an "interested party to interested party" dynamic.

Despite the lack of concrete physical evidence, the author expresses conviction in Próspera's sincerity, suggesting the complexity of her case stems from internal factors rather than external alien influence. The article touches upon the possibility of psychological explanations and the challenges of investigating such phenomena, especially when memories are recalled through hypnosis, which can sometimes reinforce existing beliefs rather than uncovering objective facts. The author acknowledges that while Próspera's story is conventional within abduction narratives, the process of memory recall is anomalous, appearing spontaneously rather than through blocked memories accessed by hypnosis.

The Case of Jason Andrews and Tony Dodd

The issue then shifts to the case of Jason Andrews, a 14-year-old boy whose alleged alien abductions were serialized in The Sun newspaper and covered by James Dalrymple in the Daily Mail. The book "Abducted: The True Story of Alien Abduction in Rural England," co-authored by Jason's mother, Ann Andrews, and Jean Ritchie, is presented as a key source. The author, Kevin McClure, expresses concern about the book's potential to spread the abduction myth and its cult-like aspects. He questions the claims made by Tony Dodd, who appears to be a significant influence in the public perception of abductions and mutilations.

Dodd's beliefs, as expressed in a letter to Omar Fowler, suggest a coordination between terrestrial and extraterrestrial races, with some aliens being benevolent and others malevolent. He also believes in government cover-ups regarding alien activities. Dodd's work with abductees, including Jason, is described as offering spiritual comfort, particularly to patients in hospices. The article highlights Dodd's belief that Jason was chosen to transmit messages of peace and cosmic understanding, with these messages appearing in his mind.

McClure raises serious doubts about the veracity of the Andrews family's claims, particularly concerning Jason's alleged expulsion from school, hospital visits, and mysterious circular marks. He notes significant discrepancies between different versions of the story, including the age at which Jason's experiences began and the details surrounding alleged animal mutilations. The article suggests that the family, influenced by Dodd and ufological literature, has come to believe that Jason's behavioral problems stem from alien abductions. The mother even believes she herself has been abducted, explaining a past miscarriage as an alien intervention.

McClure criticizes the lack of independent corroboration for the claims and points out that the narrative seems to fit Dodd's established framework for abduction experiences. He expresses concern that Jason, like other abductees, may be manipulated, and that the focus on alien abductions distracts from potential psychological issues. The article concludes by questioning why Dodd does not report alleged animal mutilations or child abuse to the authorities, suggesting that he may see these events as part of a larger alien agenda. The author expresses concern about the dangerous influence of such beliefs on vulnerable individuals, citing a passage where Jason contemplated suicide.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue consistently explores the theme of alien abductions, presenting detailed witness testimonies alongside critical analysis. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious skepticism, questioning the veracity of claims, highlighting inconsistencies, and exploring potential psychological and social factors that may influence witness accounts. The magazine emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and independent verification when examining paranormal phenomena. The cases of Próspera Muñoz and Jason Andrews serve as focal points for discussing the complexities of memory, belief, and the influence of investigators and media on alleged abduction experiences.

Title: La Nave de los Locos
Issue: 12
Date: November 2001
Main Cover Headline: El problema de las abducciones múltiples (The problem of multiple abductions)

This issue of "La Nave de los Locos" focuses on the complex and often controversial topic of alien abductions, exploring the challenges in verifying witness accounts, the role of memory, and the potential for manipulation.

Article 1: The Problem of Multiple Abductions

Author: Luis R. González Manso (Spain)

This article critically examines the phenomenon of multiple alien abductions, questioning the reliability of evidence presented by ufologists. González Manso begins by highlighting the serious implications of encouraging children to believe in abduction scenarios, suggesting that such beliefs could be harmful and require societal intervention. He argues that the context of alien abduction beliefs should not be treated with less seriousness than other potentially harmful ideologies.

The author emphasizes the need for rigorous investigation, starting with identifying inconsistencies and contradictions in witness testimonies. He points to the case of Tony Dodd's investigation into alleged abductions, noting that discrepancies between Dodd's 1996 UFO Magazine article and his 1998 book diminish the credibility of his findings. González Manso has contacted the publishing company for clarification on specific points, including the organization of a suicide, the decision not to report Jason's disappearance to the police, and the lack of reporting for unexplained deaths and aggressions against domestic animals.

He raises the question of how and to whom such matters should be addressed, noting that this situation is unprecedented in the Atlantic region and calls for proactive measures to prevent its recurrence.

Article 2: I Think I Saw a Cute Bunny

Source: Magonia Supplement N° 37, October 5, 2001
Translator: D. Zúñiga

This piece discusses a study from the University of Washington that demonstrates the malleability and unreliability of past memories. The study, conducted by Jacquie Pickrell and Elizabeth Loftus, showed that over 30% of participants who saw an image of Bugs Bunny shaking hands with Disney World characters later recalled meeting Bugs Bunny during their childhood visits to Disney, despite Bugs Bunny not being a Disney character and never appearing at Disney World.

This phenomenon highlights how people can be convinced they experienced events that never occurred. The article notes the implications for advertisers and marketers, citing an example of a brewery that used "old scenes" on its bottles, leading adults to recall drinking the product in their childhood, even though it wasn't available until the 1990s.

In the context of ufology, this research has profound implications. The article suggests that many reported UFO sightings and alien encounters from childhood might be influenced by suggestion or false memory. It also points to cases of "flying saucers" sighted before 1947 but reported years later, raising questions about the accuracy of such recollections.

Article 3: The Problem of Multiple Abductions

Author: Luis R. González Manso (Spain)

This article delves into the "Allagash Abductions" case, reviewing Raymond E. Fowler's book "The Allagash Abductions: Undeniable Evidence of Alien Intervention." The case involves four individuals—Jim Weiner, Jack Weiner, Charlie Foltz, and Chuck Rak—who claimed to have been abducted by aliens during a canoe trip in Maine in 1976.

Raymond E. Fowler presented the case at the PSI Symposium in 1988. Jim Weiner, who had a history of temporal-limbic epilepsy, recounted disturbing nocturnal experiences. These experiences were potentially linked to a UFO sighting in 1976 involving him, his twin brother Jack, and two friends. The group had been on a canoe excursion in the Allagash Waterway when they encountered a luminous sphere.

Fowler's investigation, which began 13 years after the event, involved extensive hypnosis sessions with the witnesses. The article details the hypnosis sessions and the varying accounts provided by each individual. Key discrepancies are noted in their descriptions of the UFO's interior, the appearance of the beings, and the sequence of events during the alleged abduction.

For instance, Jim and Chuck described the beings as having three fingers, while Jack mentioned four opposable fingers. The interior of the craft and the examination procedures also varied in their accounts. The article presents comparative tables detailing the hypnosis dates, order of hypnosis, descriptions of the UFO, mode of access, and medical examinations for each witness.

Despite the claims of independent witnesses and the extensive investigation, the article concludes that the inconsistencies between the witnesses' accounts make it difficult to consider the case as strong evidence for alien intervention. The author suggests that the phenomenon of multiple abductions, like the 'implants' discussed previously, lacks convincing evidence.

Article 4: The Refutation is Healthy

Author: Rodolfo Tassi* (Argentina)

Rodolfo Tassi, a collaborator with "La Nave de los Locos," shares his experience with a psychiatric patient named Eliana who believed she was abducted by aliens. Tassi, an Argentine ufologist, expresses his skepticism towards certain ufologists whom he accuses of distorting natural phenomena or misidentifying aircraft like the F-117 to gain direct profit from their readers.

He recounts how Eliana, a young woman from a well-off family, was brought to him due to her obsession with "martians." Tassi spent two months in exhaustive therapy sessions with her. He notes that Eliana's writings and conversations revolved around aliens and extraterrestrial encounters.

During one session, Eliana became emotional and pointed to the movie "Close Encounters of the Third Kind." Tassi agreed to watch the film with her, using it as an opportunity to analyze her reactions and expressions. He later visited Eliana's home, observing her room filled with posters of alien-themed movies and her own drawings depicting alien abductions.

Tassi identified Eliana's desire for a sexual contact with an extraterrestrial as a driving force behind her obsession. He criticizes the media, including the TV series "Star Trek: The Next Generation," for potentially implanting subliminal ideas that contribute to such obsessions. He contrasts this with J.J. Benítez's book "Caballo de Troya," which he suggests is presented as factual but is, in reality, a novel based on "The Urantia Book."

Tassi concludes that ufological narratives often cater to a public seeking magical solutions, likening it to a poisonous bacteria that impairs rational thinking. He states his skepticism and calls for concrete evidence, such as an alien artifact, rather than relying on anecdotal accounts or speculative theories.

Article 5: Has the Hour Come for J. J. Benítez?

Author: Javier Cavanilles (Spain)

This article discusses the growing criticism and problems faced by Spanish ufologist Juan José Benítez, particularly concerning his book "Caballo de Troya" (Trojan Horse). Benítez, known for his work on the Shroud of Turin and conspiracy theories, is facing a "rebellion" from some of his followers due to three main issues: the veracity of "Caballo de Troya," its connection to "The Urantia Book," and his decision to charge followers for access to his website.

Many readers believed "Caballo de Troya" to be entirely true, as Benítez had previously presented his work as factual. However, an epilogue discovered in early editions of the book in Colombia revealed that while some parts were based on real events, the book was essentially a novel. Benítez stated that "Caballo de Troya" was his first essay in novelistic creation, where the plot was fictionalized, but the documentation regarding Jesus of Nazareth's last eleven days was authentic.

This revelation led to significant backlash on Benítez's website forum. The article also notes that "Caballo de Troya" has not been published in the United States, which is seen as suspicious by some, given the alleged involvement of the FBI, Army, and secret services in a conspiracy against Benítez. There is also a lack of independent research on the book by North American ufologists.

The article briefly introduces "The Urantia Book" as a compilation of texts purportedly "transmitted" to a person.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of alien abduction claims, the psychological aspects of memory and belief, and the scrutiny of prominent figures in ufology. The magazine adopts a skeptical yet open-minded stance, encouraging critical thinking and demanding verifiable evidence rather than accepting anecdotal accounts or unsubstantiated theories. There is a clear emphasis on distinguishing between factual investigation and speculative narratives, particularly in the context of sensationalized UFO literature.

Title: La Nave de los Locos
Issue: N° 12
Date: November 2001

This issue of "La Nave de los Locos" delves into various aspects of ufology, skepticism, and the debunking of paranormal claims. It features articles on controversial figures, historical UFO cases, and the ongoing debate between scientific inquiry and pseudoscientific beliefs.

J.J. Benítez and the Urantia Foundation

The issue begins by discussing the influence of the Urantia Foundation's texts on the work of writer J.J. Benítez. Benítez, who has denied direct links between his work and the LU (Urantia), nevertheless thanked the foundation for allowing him to consult their texts. His readers suggest that the Urantia book influenced his works such as "Sueños," "La Rebelión de Lucifer," "Mágica Fe," and "A 33.000 pies."

The article also touches upon Benítez's controversial stance on charging for access to his website, which began in September 2000. After facing criticism, he announced free access and refunds. However, his response to critics, particularly his question "¿ESTÁN LOS IGNORANTES Y MALINTENCIONADOS DISPUESTOS A REGALARME 200.000 DÓLARES?", further inflamed the situation. He argued that writers receive only a small percentage of book sales, which must cover research and living expenses. A reader's calculation showed that 10% of sales from one of Benítez's books would amount to a substantial sum, questioning his financial needs.

Following this controversy, Benítez announced a temporary suspension of his website's updates for an investigation trip to various international locations, including Israel, Jordan, Algeria, Libya, Mali, USA, Central and South America, the Azores, France, and Italy. This move was seen by some as an attempt to disappear from the public eye.

The Maury Island UFO Incident: A Hoax Exposed

Félix Ares de Blas (Spain) contributes an article detailing the Maury Island UFO incident. Initially, the case involved reports of "nocturnal flying saucers" and subsequent hoaxes. Fred Chrisman and Harold A. Dahl claimed to have seen six discs near Maury Island, Washington, with one disintegrating. They attempted to sell their story to a magazine. Later, they met with investigators Kenneth Arnold and Captain Emile J. Smith. During the investigation, Dahl presented fragments allegedly from the 'saucer.' Tragically, the plane carrying two intelligence officers who took the fragments for analysis crashed, killing them. Anonymous calls suggested the plane was shot down, but the official cause was a fire in the exhaust tube.

Analysis revealed the fragments were merely unusual rock formations from the island. Under interrogation, Dahl's wife confessed that the story was fabricated for publicity to sell their article. Despite this, the case was long considered a genuine enigma and evidence of a government cover-up. The article notes that the government chose not to prosecute the individuals, deeming it a prank that had escalated, but the incident nonetheless fueled conspiracy theories.

The Roswell Incident and the Martian Hypothesis

The article briefly mentions the Roswell incident in July 1947, where military personnel allegedly recovered wreckage and occupants from a crashed spacecraft. This event is cited as a key element in theories about extraterrestrial visitation.

It then discusses the emergence of the Martian hypothesis for UFOs, popularized by Donald Keyhoe's 1950 book "The Flying Saucers Are Real." Before this, "flying saucer" was a vague term for unexplained aerial phenomena, often linked to potential Soviet military activity.

Explaining the Unexplained: The Kenneth Arnold Sighting

The article addresses the Kenneth Arnold sighting, which gave rise to the UFO mythology. It argues that "unexplained" does not mean "inexplicable," as natural causes can often account for sightings. Several hypotheses are presented for Arnold's sighting, including atmospheric phenomena. One detailed explanation, drawing from the author's personal experience, describes how wind blowing snow off the slopes of Mount Rainier can create reflections that appear as luminous objects, especially when viewed at certain angles. The synchronized movement and apparent 'jumps' of the objects can be explained by wind gusts affecting different peaks simultaneously.

Betty Cash and the "Irradiated" Encounter

A brief note corrects an omission in a previous issue regarding Betty Cash. The article clarifies that Betty Cash, who was allegedly "irradiated" by a UFO, died in December 1998 in Alabama from cancer-related complications.

Rodrigo Fuenzalida and the "Grey Alien" Encounter

Another section discusses Rodrigo Fuenzalida, a ufologist who appeared on the Mega program "Combinado Nacional" alongside a "grey alien." The article suggests that such programs are designed for entertainment rather than serious debate, often sensationalizing UFOs. Fuenzalida's appearance with a grey alien is presented as a risk inherent in participating in such shows.

Enrique Márquez: Skepticism and the Fight Against Pseudoscience

An interview with Enrique Márquez, former head of the Argentinian skeptical association CAIRP (Centro Argentino para la Investigación y Refutación de la Pseudociencia), is featured. Márquez, a psychologist and illusionist, discusses his views on the development of pseudoscience in Argentina. He highlights CAIRP's role in exposing fraudulent claims and providing critical information to the public. Márquez believes that "magical-irrational" thinking is pervasive and unlikely to be eradicated. He finds amusement in the reactions of pseudoscientists to his critiques and advises those new to active skepticism to treat it as a hobby.

He also discusses the influence of figures like James Randi and Martin Gardner in the field of active skepticism. Márquez expresses a pessimistic outlook for the future of parapsychology, suggesting it will likely remain commercialized rather than achieve scientific rigor.

"Puede Fallar" and the Persistence of Pseudoscience

The article "¿Crees que ha surtido efecto esta suerte de vigilancia que ejercieron entre los charlatanes y mercaderes de la pseudociencia?" (Did this surveillance of charlatans and merchants of pseudoscience have an effect?) explores the impact of critical efforts. It notes that before CAIRP, there was less critical journalism on paranormal topics. Today, the media is more open to counter-opinions, and journalism is more likely to raise suspicions about alleged paranormal events. The book "Puede Fallar" (It Can Fail), co-authored by Márquez and Alejandro Borgo, compiles failed prophecies of astrologers, psychics, and mentalists in Argentina. The article acknowledges that while the book might not have been a bestseller, it contributed to the critical discourse.

It questions whether a fertile ground exists for widespread rationality, concluding that "magical-irrational" thoughts are deeply ingrained in all aspects of life. The article suggests that scientific research is attempting to understand magical-religious thought, but eradicating it is unlikely. It also touches upon the persistence of charlatans, citing the axiom that "a new fool is born every day," and the tendency for "trash to always recycle."

Antonio Ribera: A Tribute to a Ufologist

Sergio Sánchez writes a tribute to the late Antonio Ribera, described as the "dean of Spanish ufology." Ribera, who passed away at 81, was a prolific author whose books were widely consulted by the "old guard" of Ibero-American ufologists. The author recounts his personal experience of discovering ufology through Ribera's books, starting with "Platillos volantes" at age eleven. While acknowledging that Ribera's work sometimes contained gratuitous speculation and fantasy, Sánchez praises his common sense, good faith, humor, and literary quality. Ribera's role as a translator also introduced Spanish readers to key works in classic ufology, such as those by Jacques Vallée and Aimé Michel.

The article contrasts Ribera's approach with that of contemporary ufologists like J.J. Benítez and Ramírez Reyes, whose work is sometimes characterized by less rigorous investigation and a focus on field work and blurry videos. Ribera is remembered for his belief in the extraterrestrial hypothesis, even in his science fiction novels, but also for his humanistic perspective. The author notes that Ribera did not become wealthy from his work and died in precarious financial circumstances, demonstrating that writing about ufology does not equate to living from it. The tribute concludes with a poetic wish for Ribera's spirit to find peace in a universe of beautiful seas and unusual creatures.

Confusion Surrounding Bruno Cardeñosa

Diego Zúñiga C. investigates a controversy involving Bruno Cardeñosa, a Spanish journalist known for his work on paranormal topics. The article addresses a claim that Cardeñosa defended the ghostly origin of a scene in the film "Tres solteros y un biberón" (Three Men and a Baby) on the TV program "Otra Dimensión." Cardeñosa denied ever appearing on that program or making such a statement. "La Nave de los Locos" asserts it has proof, including a video transcription, that Cardeñosa did indeed defend the paranormal interpretation of the scene. The article presents the transcription and suggests Cardeñosa is attempting to deny something that is clearly on record.

CIFOV's Response to Pedro Muñoz and UFO Sightings in Chile

CIFOV, a Chilean ufological group, provides their opinion on the work of geographer Pedro Muñoz. They refute claims about Muñoz's involvement in the "ruta OVNI" (UFO route) as presented in a previous article. CIFOV clarifies that Muñoz was asked by the production company Nueva Imagen to map recorded UFO cases for the program "Ovni en Los Andes." They state their analysis of the documentary was based solely on the televised material.

The article details the "Ovni en Los Andes" program's introduction, mentioning a UFO wave in February 1997 and showing footage from Quilpué. It notes Muñoz's connection to the "ortotenia" controversy and his attempt to map the February 1997 UFO wave. CIFOV criticizes Nueva Imagen for its handling of Pedro Muñoz and suggests that Rodrigo Fuenzalida, who allegedly investigated cases with the production company, needs to improve his critical filtering.

CIFOV concludes that their scientific analysis of the 1997 and 2000 sightings points to conventional explanations, likely related to space rockets passing over the Pacific Ocean off the coast of Chile. They presented their findings to CEFAA (Comité de Estudios de Fenómenos Aéreos Anómalos) and continue their study to identify the responsible rockets. The article anticipates that some ufologists will still claim these were camouflaged flying saucers.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFO phenomena, the debunking of paranormal claims, and the distinction between scientific investigation and pseudoscience. The magazine consistently adopts a skeptical stance, seeking rational explanations for reported events and exposing hoaxes and fraudulent claims. There is a strong emphasis on evidence-based reasoning and a critique of sensationalism in ufology. The editorial stance clearly favors critical thinking and scientific methodology over unsubstantiated beliefs and conspiracy theories.

This issue of "La Nave de los Locos" (The Ship of Fools), number 12 of Year 2, dated November 2001, is a Spanish-language bulletin from Santiago, Chile. It is edited independently and without profit. The directors are Sergio Sánchez and Diego Zúñiga, with design by Diego Zúñiga and drawings by Cristina González, Juan Palma, and Diego Arandojo.

Film Analysis: 'La Nave de los Locos' Scene

The issue opens with an analysis of a scene from a film, possibly "Tres solteros y un biberón" (Three Bachelors and a Bottle), where a child and a rifle appear in a window. The narrator suggests this might be a psychic imprint of a dramatic event that occurred in the house where the film was shot, specifically the accidental shooting death of a child of the owners. Film critic Jesús Palacios offers a more rational explanation, suggesting it was a filming error or a child sneaking onto the set. However, the article points out that no rifle was present during filming, and for parapsychological experts, the rifle and child are a psychic trace of a dramatic event, with the camera acting as a silent witness. Bruno Cardeñosa emphasizes that cinema cameras can capture presences invisible to the human eye.

Editorial Stance and Debate

An editorial note acknowledges Bruno Cardeñosa's position but states a disagreement with his arguments, inviting texts in his defense. "La Nave de los Locos" is presented as a space for open debate. Zenón Sanz is mentioned as promising a rebuttal article to Cardeñosa.

Events and Lectures

Friendship Case at CEFAA: The issue reports on a well-attended lecture at CEFAA on October 25th by the group GOFA2, focusing on the "Friendship" case. The event was described as exciting, and a future discussion on November 29th, titled "Friendship: The Whole Truth?", is announced.

'Reprobados' (Failed/Disapproved): This section criticizes the involvement of Cristián Riffo with the Universidad Diego Portales, where he allegedly presented himself as a "scientific journalist" and writer. The authors express surprise that a university would provide a platform for what they consider "delirious ufologists" to discuss topics that are hindering the serious consideration of ufology. They believe that such presentations would likely alienate academics from the subject.

Book Reviews

1. 'The Encyclopedia of Extraterrestrial Encounters' by Ronald Story

This review discusses a 2001 encyclopedia edited by Ronald Story, featuring contributions from prominent figures in ufology like Stanton T. Friedman and Carl Sagan. The reviewer highlights the extensive contributions of Martin S. Kottmeyer and Alvin H. Lawson. The book aims to provide the core of psychosocial thought regarding UFOs for an American audience. It includes biographies of investigators, their stances on UFOs, contact information, and references to internet pages and related books/films. The selection of cases is noted as varied, including alleged frauds and well-documented encounters. The review mentions the inclusion of material from Scott Corrales on Hispanic-American cases, with a sensationalist tone, and the UMMO case from Spain, described as a fraud. The 1995-96 Galician UFO wave is called one of the most documented of the decade. Despite the inclusion of some credulous material, such as a lengthy entry defending Eduard Meier, the overall tone is described as skeptical and impartial, though not always consistently so. An example is given of the differing treatment of UFO sightings by astronauts (James Oberg's skeptical explanations for US astronauts) versus cosmonauts (Michael Hesemann's lack of skepticism for Russian cosmonauts). The review notes that some material may be outdated due to the lengthy production process.

2. 'Alien Abductions: Creating a Modern Phenomenon' by Terry Matheson

This book is described as a guide on how to write a "best-selling" ufological work. The author, Terry Matheson, a literature professor, analyzes the proliferation of abduction narratives in the United States and how this material is presented to the public. He examines key books on the subject, from John G. Fuller's "The Interrupted Journey" about the Hill case to John Mack's "Abduction." Matheson dissects the tactics and stratagems used by authors to make increasingly fantastic stories believable. The review notes that Matheson points out controversial aspects of cases and suggests new avenues of exploration. For instance, he posits that the Hill's abduction story might have masked racial issues, given Barney Hill was a mixed-race couple during a time of racial tension. He also finds similarities between Betty Andreasson's account and "The Wizard of Oz." The reviewer concludes that this is a distinct approach to the abduction phenomenon worth considering.

Television and Ufology

'¿SE ACUERDAN?' (Do You Remember?): Chilean TV Series

This section critiques a Chilean TV series, "Borrón y cuenta nueva," for its weak plot, which was only saved by the actors' performances. The series featured a character who was abducted by aliens, but the plot focused more on romantic drama, with the abduction being a secondary concern. The reviewer finds the final episode particularly ridiculous, where the protagonist, fresh from an alien encounter, prioritizes his romantic relationship over discussing the abduction. The piece also mocks a ufologist character in the series who constantly talked about UFOs and "greys," calling him an "authentic bore" and suggesting Philip Klass would resort to a beating if he met him.

Book Review: 'OVNIS, EXTRATERRESTRES Y OTROS EN CHILE' by Jorge Anfruns Dumont

This review is highly critical of Jorge Anfruns' book, "OVNIS, EXTRATERRESTRES Y OTROS EN CHILE." The reviewer describes Anfruns as a Chilean J. J. Benítez, characterized by egocentrism and a lack of critical analysis. The book is accused of presenting anecdotal evidence as confirmed cases without rigorous investigation. Anfruns is criticized for his uncritical acceptance of witness testimonies and his belief that he can anticipate alien events, as suggested by a quote about his predictive abilities. The reviewer highlights Anfruns' claim to be the "number 1 ufologist in the Nation" and his tendency to fuse speculation with personal experience. The book is characterized as a disorganized collection of "primary ufology," lacking internal cohesion and intellectual respectability, relying on "citable quotes" to appear credible. The reviewer quotes Salvador Freixedo, who described such works as reheated old broth with modern seasonings that still retain the unpleasant taste of the old dogma. The review also points out Anfruns' belief that alien entities are watching him and that he is a frequent subject of strange occurrences. The reviewer questions the credibility of Anfruns' methodology, which relies on vague details and lacks proper documentation, suggesting that such compilations should be considered fiction until they meet minimum research requirements.

'Gorbachov a la chilena' (A Chilean Gorbachov): The Gaspar Case

This section details a case from Anfruns' book involving a witness named Gaspar, who claims to have had an encounter with a non-terrestrial female in a spacecraft. Anfruns' questioning is described as leading and designed to elicit specific responses, such as the nature of the alien's appearance and the possibility of a sexual relationship. The case is compared to the Villas Boas incident, with the reviewer noting the similarity of the alien entities. Gaspar claims improved eyesight and a mark on his head resembling Gorbachov's. The review also mentions a visit from Japanese individuals who photographed Gaspar multiple times. Anfruns' methodology is questioned again, particularly his inquiry about detecting extraterrestrials among humans, to which Gaspar replies, "Only by their gaze. They look deeply, as if they see through you."

Olga and Paranormal Powers

Anfruns' book also includes an account of Olga, a woman with paranormal abilities and a friend of Anfruns, who claims that Gorbachov's absence was a fabrication and that he was taken aboard a spacecraft. Anfruns' reaction to Olga's story is described as taking it seriously, attributing it to his "open mind" (which the reviewer contrasts with a lack of critical thinking). Olga's worldview, as presented by Anfruns, includes genetic manipulation, hybridization, and alien insemination, which the reviewer labels as "demonic topics of contemporary ufology."

Anfruns' Presentation and 'Invisible Powers'

The review recounts Anfruns' experience giving a presentation on Chilean ufology. He describes feeling a great responsibility and the weight of the Chilean flag behind him. He mentions unexpected "special effects" from the slide projector and accidental photographs taken during the conference. Anfruns interprets these events as orchestrated by "Invisible Powers" who feared his message. He then recounts a conversation with Olga, who perceived "energetic formations" around his head, signifying the presence of a "very high entity" or extra-dimensional beings who were observing his presentation. Anfruns reflects on vanity and the belief that humans are the sole inhabitants of the universe, suggesting that "Invisible Powers" are actively fostering disbelief, which paradoxically benefits the popularity of mystery divulgators like J. J. Benítez and Erich von Däniken.

Chauvinism and Conclusion

This section criticizes the notion that Chile is a privileged country for UFO visits, attributing this idea to national inferiority complexes and chauvinism. The reviewer dismisses claims of Chile being a "favorite" or a "passageway" for extraterrestrials as "small-country" megalomania. Anfruns is cited again, claiming Chile's varied nature and low population density make it ideal for UFOs and extraterrestrial landings. The reviewer concludes that Anfruns' books are characterized by egocentrism, lack of method, and paranoia, with this first book setting the tone for subsequent ones. The review serves as a call for ufologists to critically re-evaluate Anfruns' work. The section ends with a quote from Anfruns stating that UFOs have visited and will continue to visit Chile until another space race demonstrates humanity's past correctness in believing Chile was a preferred location for UFOs. The reviewer reiterates that an investigator's role is to anticipate events.

"PENAN" EN EL "TITANIC" (Penance on the Titanic)

This brief report mentions an exhibition in Chile of the "Titanic" wreckage. Security guards at the exhibition reportedly refuse to do night rounds, claiming to have witnessed inexplicable noises, ghost apparitions (the captain and a woman in white), and objects mysteriously changing position. The beds in the exhibit were found disordered in the morning. The article humorously notes that the guards' wives are not subscribers to the Skeptical Inquirer.

NEW ISSUE OF EJUFOAS

This short note announces the release of Volume 2 (2) of the European Journal of UFO and Abductions Studies (EJUFOAS), edited by Craig Roberts. It includes articles on psychological aspects of UFO experience, the Cold War connection to flying saucers, and case studies. The cost for Europe is £5.75.

IMPERDONABLE OLVIDO (Unforgivable Omission)

This personal note from the reviewer expresses regret for not being able to include a participation in Eric Bellido's "Animatronics" event at Estación Mapocho due to the magazine's deadline. The reviewer acknowledges Bellido's open-mindedness in inviting them despite their critical stance on ufological spectacles, praising his respect for differing opinions and his pluralism.

Errata and Next Issue

Errata N° 11: The previous issue incorrectly announced two articles. "OVNIS EN LA HISTORIA DE CHILE" was postponed due to space, and "LA NAVE SE DEFIENDE DE ATAQUES ARTEROS" was published online.

Next Issue (N° 13 - January 2002): The upcoming issue will feature "The Hill Case / Interview with Betty Hill," "We Will Take Measures Against Abductions," and the fourth and final part of "The Myth of the Cover-up," along with other content.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of "La Nave de los Locos" consistently adopts a critical and skeptical stance towards ufological claims, particularly those presented without rigorous methodology or evidence. The magazine champions rational explanations and investigative integrity, often contrasting them with what it perceives as sensationalism, egocentrism, and unsubstantiated beliefs within the ufology community. The editorial stance is one of promoting critical thinking and open debate, while firmly challenging what it deems to be pseudoscientific or irrational interpretations of phenomena. There is a clear distinction made between serious investigation and what the publication views as uncritical acceptance of anecdotal evidence and speculative theories. The magazine also engages with popular culture, analyzing how UFO phenomena are portrayed in film and television, often with a critical eye.