La Nave de los Locos - No 11

Magazine Overview

Title: LA NAVE DE LOS LOCOS
Issue: N° 11
Volume: Año 2
Date: Septiembre 2001
Publisher: LA NAVE DE LOS LOCOS
Country: Spain
Language: Spanish
Price: $ 400

This issue of "La Nave de los Locos" delves into "Unofficial UFO Reports," presenting a critical and rational debate on ufology, parapsychology, and other related topics. The cover headline highlights the examination of the Sturrock Panel and the Cometa Report, suggesting a skeptical approach to these often-cited UFO investigations.

Editorial

The editorial, titled "EDITORIAL," addresses the recurring phenomenon of "pompous 'reports'" endorsed by scientists and military figures, which often generate excitement within the ufological community but ultimately fail to provide definitive answers. The editorial criticizes the tendency to elevate these reports to definitive truths, suggesting that many are flawed and do not represent accepted extraterrestrial spacecraft. "La Nave de los Locos" aims to present a balanced view, offering articles that question the validity of these widely accepted UFO reports, moving beyond mere speculation.

Summary of Contents (SUMARIO)

The issue features a comprehensive summary of its articles:

• Tras los OVNIS oficiosos (Sergio Sánchez) - 03
• El Panel Sturrock (Philip Klass) - 05
• Comentarios sobre el "Informe Cometa" (Claude Maugé) - 11
• El 'Informe Cometa' y el rol de los ufólogos (Pierre Lagrange) - 14
• De la bomba atómica a los platillos volantes (Félix Ares de Blas) - 17
• El mito de las sectas (Sergio Sánchez) - 21
• Generales después de la guerra (Rodrigo Fuenzalida) - 24
• Comentarios desafortunados (CIFOV) - 28
• ¿Es Benítez un ET camuflado? (Luis A. Gámez) - 31
• El fracaso de la invasión ET (Enrique Symms) - 32
• Cielos Antiguos (Mario Méndez) - 34
• Los Cuadernos de Saliano (Sergio Sánchez) - 37
• Recibimos (Diego Zúñiga) - 40
• Libros (Diego Zúñiga) - 42

Article: Tras los OVNIS oficiosos (By Sergio Sánchez R.)

This article introduces the dossier on "non-official ufological reports." It discusses the long-standing hope within the ufological community for a singular event or scientific consensus that would confirm the reality of UFOs. Sánchez critiques the "mythical components" of ufology, particularly the archetype of the "mad scientist" who is seen as a visionary battling a conservative scientific establishment. He argues that while scientific communities can have bureaucratic issues, the idea of a monolithic conspiracy is a caricature amplified by New Age and postmodern thought. The article also touches upon the concept of "parallel knowledge" or "forbidden history," suggesting that while we may not know everything about our past, this doesn't justify conspiracy theories.

Article: Panel Sturrock (By Philip J. Klass)

Philip J. Klass, a well-known skeptic, analyzes the "Scientific Review Panel" directed by Peter Sturrock. The panel, composed of nine scientists, concluded after reviewing cases presented by ufologists that "we are not convinced that any of the presented evidence implies the intervention of currently unknown physical processes or points to the participation of an extraterrestrial intelligence." The panel also noted that the rigor of current UFO research often falls short of established scientific standards. Klass highlights Sturrock's long-standing interest in UFOs and his efforts to promote their study through the Scientific Exploration Society (SSE). He points out that Sturrock selected ufologists who were proponents of the extraterrestrial hypothesis to present cases to the panel, excluding skeptics. Klass details the Mansfield, Ohio helicopter case, where a supposed UFO encounter was presented as evidence, but Klass claims to have found prosaic explanations for the reported phenomena, including issues with the compass and the pilot's actions. He criticizes the panel for not having access to his full investigation and for accepting the ufologists' accounts without sufficient scrutiny.

Article: The Cash-Landrum Case as an Example of Severe Physical Effects

This section details the Cash-Landrum incident from December 1980, where Betty Cash, Vicki Landrum, and her grandson Colby reported a diamond-shaped object emitting flames and heat. They claimed to have suffered various health problems, including burns and hair loss, which they attributed to gamma rays from the UFO. The article notes that an investigation of the car found no damage, and the author, Schuessler, questions the witnesses' prior health, mentioning Betty Cash had undergone bypass surgery and had lumps removed. Schuessler's own investigation into potential radiation yielded no results. The article suggests that the panel may have accepted Schuessler's claims of the witnesses' good health prior to the incident without sufficient verification.

Article: The Panel Was Impressed by French Efforts on UFOs, Especially the Trans-en-Provence Case

This section discusses the panel's impression of the French GEPAN (now SEPRA) agency's scientific approach to UFO investigation, particularly the Trans-en-Provence case. GEPAN, founded in 1977, received thousands of reports, but only a small fraction remained unexplained. The case involved Renato Niccolai reporting a disk-shaped craft landing and leaving marks. Analysis of soil and vegetation samples by Professor Michael E. L. Bounias suggested biochemical changes proportional to the distance from the landing site. However, the article notes that these findings were criticized by ufologists Eric Maillot and a Belgian botanist. The reduction in GEPAN's budget and activities in subsequent years is presented as a clear message from the French space agency CNES, indicating a lack of significant scientific breakthrough from their UFO research.

Sturrock Tries to Present the Best Face of the Panel's Skeptical Conclusions

This part of the article suggests that Peter Sturrock was surprised by the panel's skeptical reactions to the ufologists' presentations. While the panel acknowledged that some reported incidents might involve unusual phenomena, they found no convincing evidence for extraterrestrial intelligence. The article highlights the panel's conclusion that a few reported incidents might involve rare but significant phenomena, but no evidence points to unknown physical processes or extraterrestrial involvement. They also stated that while studying unexplained observations could be beneficial, credible evaluations require objectivity and consideration of alternative hypotheses, with physical evidence being key.

Carl Sagan Learned, Peter Sturrock Did Not

This section contrasts the learning process of the late Dr. Carl Sagan with Peter Sturrock. It notes that Sagan, initially open to the possibility of UFOs being extraterrestrial craft in the 1960s, became increasingly skeptical over the years as he learned more about ufology. In contrast, Sturrock, despite his panel's conclusions aligning with Dr. Edward Condon's 1968 assessment that there was no convincing evidence for extraterrestrial visitation, appears to be slower to learn, as demonstrated by his continued efforts to promote UFO study. The article concludes by referencing Condon's prediction that further study of UFOs would not yield significant scientific benefits, a prediction that, according to the authors, has been borne out by decades of ufological research.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critical examination of UFO phenomena and the scientific community's response. The magazine adopts a skeptical stance, emphasizing the importance of rigorous scientific methodology, objective analysis, and the consideration of prosaic explanations over sensational claims. It challenges the notion of a scientific conspiracy or cover-up, instead highlighting the inherent skepticism within science and the need for credible evidence. The editorial stance is clearly one of rational inquiry, aiming to debunk unsubstantiated claims and promote a more grounded understanding of UFO reports, distinguishing between genuine scientific investigation and speculative ufology.

This issue of "La Nave de los Locos" (The Ship of Fools) from September 2001, issue number 11, features a critical examination of the "Informe Cometa" (Comet Report) and its role in ufology. The magazine adopts a skeptical stance towards sensationalist claims and aims to provide a more grounded perspective on UFO phenomena.

Comentarios sobre el "Informe Cometa"

This section, authored by French ufologist Claude Maugé, directly addresses the "Informe Cometa." Maugé questions the claims that the report is an "official" or "almost official" document from France, published under the auspices of institutions close to the Ministry of Defense. He argues that these assertions are part of a publicity stunt, particularly noting how the magazine VSD presented it. Maugé cites statements from French institutions, including the Elysée and Matignon, which indicate that the report was unsolicited and not requested by official bodies, suggesting the term "Report" on its cover might be a misrepresentation.

He highlights that the IHEDN (Institut des Hautes Etudes de la Défense Nationale) explicitly distanced itself from the report, stating that any actions by its authors after leaving the institute were their own responsibility and not related to IHEDN. The article also mentions that the report was published by GS Presse, not officially by a magazine, and that Cometa itself is not responsible for errors in its presentation.

Maugé criticizes the "Informe Cometa" for failing to address significant aspects of contemporary ufology, such as abduction cases, and for only superficially mentioning physical effects. He notes the lack of statistical analysis and information on different types of alleged alien beings. When the report speculates on the motivations of "visitors" and the implications for defense, Maugé finds the ideas confused and superficial, overlooking previous work. He also points out the report's critical stance on US UFO policy, which seems counterproductive if the goal is collaboration with American authorities.

The article further notes that the report is accused of unfairly attributing progress in ufology solely to US military and a few organizations, ignoring others like Gepa, LDLN, Sobeps, etc.

El "Informe Cometa" y el rol de los ufólogos

Authored by Pierre Lagrange (France), this piece analyzes the "Informe Cometa" from a sociological perspective. Lagrange notes that serious and reputable individuals delving into UFO enigmas often adopt a skeptical approach. He discusses the VSD special issue dedicated to the "confidential" report, which was allegedly sent to the President and Prime Minister of France. The report, compiled by engineers and auditors from IHEDN under the "Cometa" association, was titled "Los OVNIS y la Defensa: ¿Para qué debemos prepararnos?" and included a preface by former CNES president André Lebeau and an introduction by former IHEDN director General Norlain.

Lagrange points out that the report's discussion of international work, particularly in the United States, includes claims about technological benefits derived from the Roswell crash and contact with extraterrestrials. It even suggests that religious traditions might stem from misinterpreted visits by extraterrestrials. The report advocates for a state/military structure to centralize European UFO archives, establish a defense policy against extraterrestrials, and compel the US military to release Roswell secrets. Lagrange likens it to a blend of "The X-Files," "Independence Day," and "Men in Black," written by a polytechnician.

The article quotes the report's explanation of two forms of disinformation: the reductive approach (explaining UFOs as weather balloons or Venus) and the broader approach (spreading rumors about alien bases or falsifying documents like the Roswell autopsy). The authors of the "Informe Cometa" are accused of using the latter to desinform the public, aiming to ridicule the UFO topic.

Lagrange argues that the report's attempt to ridicule UFOs is unlikely to succeed, comparing it to the US Air Force's inability to do so over twenty years. He emphasizes that UFOs are not a trivial subject to be dismissed by academic culture or confiscated by conspiracy theorists. He quotes philosopher Isabelle Stengers, who suggests that invoking hallucination and irrationality can be a rhetorical tool to mask difficulties or avoid addressing problems.

Lagrange presents three key ideas: 1) Experts, whether rational or from VSD, err by assuming others are equally credulous. 2) Anthropologists have shown that "savages," children, or UFO witnesses are not inherently magical thinkers. 3) The idea that scientists are neutral observers is false; they construct nature within specific cultural contexts, like laboratories. He argues that when scientists observe the sky, they are no less influenced by their cultural frameworks than UFO witnesses.

He further contends that the idea of UFO enthusiasts being simpletons is also flawed. While acknowledging the existence of rigorous researchers, he notes that public discourse often focuses on conspiracy theorists from "The X-Files" rather than serious investigators. He praises the work of amateur groups like Gepa and Sobeps.

Lagrange discusses how UFOs challenge democratic regimes, posing questions about society's ability to respond to problems that reflect impotence and rejection. He suggests that ufologists have created new ways to engage the public, attracting those "avid for wonders" and scientists who may not account for such phenomena within their laboratories or military strategies.

Breves (Short News)

Cardeñosa Molesto con NL

Spanish ufologist Bruno Cardeñosa expresses annoyance that "La Nave de los Locos" did not publish a retraction regarding an article about his TV appearance. The article, "Tres hombres, un bebé y el fantasma de Bruno Cardeñosa," by Zenón Sanz, is contested by Cardeñosa. The magazine states that Cardeñosa himself was given the opportunity to issue a denial, which he has not done. They also possess video transcripts where Cardeñosa defends the veracity of a "ghost" appearing in a film, putting him in a difficult position.

Por Favor, ¡Cordura por un Día!

This piece strongly criticizes individuals who, in the wake of the September 11th attacks, focused on searching for UFOs in televised footage of the event. It specifically calls out Gustavo Fernández, an Argentine ufologist, for publishing claims of UFOs in the 9/11 footage, deeming it sensationalist and opportunistic.

El CAIRP No Va Más

A lamentable piece of news from Argentina: the Centro Argentino para la Investigación y Refutación de las Pseudociencias (CAIRP) has decided to disband after ten years. Despite its declining activity, CAIRP was feared by deceivers and fraudsters in the paranormal world. It published "El Ojo Escéptico" and produced videos and investigations that led to legal action against psychics and mentalists. Fortunately, some former CAIRP members have founded a new association to continue their work in demystifying fraud.

De la bomba atómica a los platillos volantes: el mito del cover-up, 2

This article by Félix Ares de Blas (Spain) continues a discussion on the origins of UFO myths, linking them to the atomic bomb and the concept of a "cover-up." It begins by recounting the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, detailing the B-29 bombers, the atomic bombs "Little Boy" and "Fat Man," and the devastating impact. The article notes the official death tolls and the destruction caused.

It then transitions to the post-war era, mentioning the establishment of the 509th Bomb Group, the first atomic bombing unit. The article highlights Emperor Hirohito's announcement of Japan's surrender, citing the "cruel and incalculable" power of a new bomb as the reason for accepting the Allied declaration. This marked the end of World War II and the beginning of the Cold War, with the Soviet Union becoming the new perceived enemy.

The narrative then shifts to the "Roswell Incident" in July 1947, where a spacecraft allegedly crashed in the New Mexico desert. The article states that military personnel recovered the wreckage and bodies of the occupants, with rumors of survivors. It suggests that the Roswell incident is a key theme for those who believe in extraterrestrial visits and that studying it could shed light on the development of mythological thought and religion.

The article touches upon the continued relevance of Los Álamos and Alamogordo after the war, with ongoing atomic bomb construction and missile tests. It describes a triangle formed by Alamogordo, White Sands, Roswell, and Los Álamos, noting rumors and an atmosphere of secrecy in the region.

La paranoia anticomunista

This subsection delves into the post-war anti-communist sentiment in the United States. It describes a truce between unions and workers during the war for military production, which broke down afterward, leading to widespread strikes in 1946. In 1947, Congress passed a law limiting union prerogatives, and a climate of suspicion and persecution emerged, foreshadowing McCarthyism. The article quotes Martinelli on the growing anti-Soviet sentiment and the fear of a "dangerous force" hidden within the country.

It details Truman's 1947 initiative to screen federal employees for political affiliations, involving questionnaires and the dismissal of a few thousand employees. The pervasive "communist under the bed" fear is described as a source of anxiety for millions. The film "The Manchurian Candidate" is mentioned as reflecting this era, and the article notes that the director, screenwriter, and some actors involved in it were on McCarthy's "blacklist."

Bombas atómicas, radares y globos

This section discusses the transfer of atomic bomb knowledge from Britain to the United States, noting Britain's lack of resources for solo development. It also highlights the importance of radar, invented by Alexander Watson-Watt, and its transfer to the US for further refinement. The American fear of the Soviet Union developing the atomic bomb led to projects like Mogul, which used large balloons equipped with detectors to identify Soviet nuclear explosions. These balloons were disguised as meteorological equipment.

Los platillos volantes entran en escena: Arnold les da un nombre

This part recounts the famous sighting by Kenneth Arnold on June 24, 1947. While flying near Mount Rainier, Arnold observed several unidentified objects flying in formation. He described their appearance as flat, like pie pans, and their movement as erratic and fast, reflecting sunlight. Arnold estimated their size as slightly smaller than a DC-4 and their speed at 1930 km/h, though the article notes this speed seems inconsistent with his description of the observation duration. Arnold's description led to the popularization of the term "flying saucer."

The article notes that Arnold's official report differs from a more fantastic account he later published in Fate Magazine. The news of his sighting spread rapidly, leading to increased public interest and numerous other UFO sightings being reported across the country and internationally, including in England and other European countries.

The article points out that the term "flying saucer" evolved to signify "extraterrestrial spacecraft." It also touches upon the concern that some sightings near the Iron Curtain might be related to Soviet activities, given the prevailing anti-Russian paranoia in the US. Some sightings were linked to Peenemunde, a former German rocket research center now under Soviet control, which was considered unsettling.

La Nave Aterriza en el CEFAA Antes que el OVNI de Paihuano

This news brief reports on a lecture given by Sergio Sánchez of "La Nave de los Locos" at CEFAA, where he presented a psychosociological hypothesis about UFOs. The audience, largely expecting confirmation of their beliefs, reacted with skepticism and demands to exclude science from ufology. Sánchez ironically suggested they go to Elqui Valley to await space beings. The brief also mentions a lecture by ufologist Patricio Díaz on the Paihuano case, which is described as lacking concrete evidence and leaning towards pro-alien speculation.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently adopts a critical and skeptical stance towards sensationalist claims in ufology. It emphasizes the importance of scientific rigor, sociological analysis, and critical thinking when examining UFO phenomena. The editorial stance appears to be that many UFO claims are either misidentifications, products of cultural influences, or deliberate disinformation, rather than evidence of extraterrestrial visitation. The magazine aims to debunk pseudoscientific claims and promote a more rational understanding of the subject, often contrasting its approach with more commercially driven or uncritical ufological publications. There is a recurring theme of questioning the motives behind UFO reports and the organizations that promote them.

Title: La Nave de los Locos
Issue: 11
Date: September 2001
Country: Chile
Language: Spanish

This issue of "La Nave de los Locos" delves into two primary themes: the nature and impact of religious sects, and the ongoing debate within ufology, particularly concerning specific UFO sightings and interpretations.

El mito de las sectas (y III) by Sergio Sánchez R.

Sergio Sánchez R. continues his critical examination of religious sects, focusing on their apocalyptic tendencies and their impact on family structures. He argues that religions, especially those with an apocalyptic outlook like Christianity and inspired neo-religions, often foster a sense of urgency, devaluing worldly concerns and personal relationships. Sánchez references Jesus's teachings about prioritizing the divine call over family ties, noting that this divisive aspect was one of the early reasons for Roman intellectuals' antipathy towards Christianity. He posits that the Roman view of Christians as fanatical, proselytizing sectarians who rejected worldly norms and claimed exclusive possession of truth, saw the surrounding civilization as lost and in error.

Sánchez highlights the concept of "common sense" as described by Voltaire, suggesting that fear can lead individuals to accept irrational beliefs, such as Mahomet placing half the moon in his sleeve. He argues that fear plays a crucial role in binding adherents to a sect, a theme he sees as rooted in ethical monotheism. The author concludes that the world itself can be viewed as a sect, questioning the precise definitions of sects and suggesting that many characteristics attributed to sects can also be found in traditional religions. He asserts that the primary differences are doctrinal and should not lead to legal persecution or parliamentary intervention. Sánchez criticizes the legitimacy of certain churches and politicians in defining "dangerous sects," pointing out the lack of scientific rigor in their definitions and the invasive nature of proposed measures, such as legislation against "mental control," which he likens to an unfortunate French law.

He supports Massimo Introvigne's view that existing common legislation should suffice for cases involving illegal activities like human trafficking, sexual abuse, incitement to suicide, or kidnapping. He criticizes the tendency to legislate based on vague prejudices and sensationalism, often driven by electoral motives or competition for followers.

Sánchez also references René Guénon, a French traditionalist, who viewed modern spiritual novelties as superficial and fraudulent, mere adulterations of the primordial Tradition. Guénon believed that external differences between traditional religions are contingent and secondary, with their essence lying in their fidelity to Tradition. Sánchez, however, finds this view authoritarian and rigid, arguing that esoteric knowledge has often been a source of heterodoxy and a challenge to priestly bureaucracies. He suggests that a more phenomenological approach is needed to understand mystical phenomena and divine experiences, which many sects offer as direct, palpable experiences of God, a contrast to the often-suppressed spiritual experiences in official churches.

He mentions the Sufi mystic Al-Hallaj, executed for his intense spiritual ardor, as an example of how profound spiritual experiences can clash with orthodoxy.

Malleus Maleficarum Sectarium (Manual for Sect Hunters)

This section provides a satirical, "how-to" guide for identifying and combating sects, presented as a series of "rules" for those who wish to be "sect hunters."

• Rule 23: Distinguish between "dangerous sects" and others to avoid being labeled "intolerant."
• Rule 24: Confuse destructive sects with all others, generalizing their negative traits (ritual suicide, economic exploitation, human trafficking) to all groups, regardless of their actual nature.
• Rule 25: Amplify rumors, regardless of their veracity, as accountability for denials is minimal.
• Rule 26: Interpret any denial of being a sect as proof of guilt, and silence as an attempt to hide something.
• Rule 27: When accused of hypocrisy by pointing out the historical practices of mainstream religions, dismiss the argument by appealing to authority and using emotional appeals, such as the story of a desperate mother.
• Rule 28: Target members of sects, their relatives, critics of sects, and even those who criticize sects but not with sufficient fervor.
• Rule 35: Emphasizes that the "Crusader" is guided by Faith, not reason.

Generales después de la guerra by Rodrigo Fuenzalida (Chile)

Rodrigo Fuenzalida responds to an article by CIFOV (a ufology group) that criticized his work. He defends his position in the ufological community and clarifies his views on various UFO cases.

Fuenzalida begins by acknowledging that his involvement in public discourse, particularly in ufology, invites commentary and criticism. He states that CIFOV's article aimed to define "critical" or "rational" ufology, which he argues is flawed. He believes that even supposedly rational approaches can be influenced by emotional and partisan biases, similar to political or religious militancy.

He criticizes CIFOV's definition of critical ufology, which emphasizes reason and rigor over emotional affinities. Fuenzalida contends that emotional factors can still influence judgments even within a critical framework. He asserts that rigor stems from experience, not mere affiliation with a particular stance. He points out that some ufologists who claim to be "critical" have not produced substantial research or analysis.

Fuenzalida addresses specific points raised by CIFOV:

• Ufologists Klass and Sheaffer: He notes that while CIFOV cites them as examples of critical ufologists, he believes they have become militant in their views, despite their contributions to ufological thought. He also points out that Klass and Sheaffer do not acknowledge the existence of original phenomena, unlike Vicente Juan Ballester Olmos.
• Media Appearances: He defends his media appearances, explaining that the limited time (often 10 minutes) on talk shows makes it difficult to delve into complex aspects of ufology. He highlights his successful TV series "OVNI" as an effort to provide more in-depth coverage.
• The "Romboidal" UFO Incident: Fuenzalida clarifies that a video shown on TVN, initially presented as a UFO, was actually an airplane due to an editing error. He states he personally explained this distortion, which is caused by the camera's diaphragm, using examples from Sebastopol and Northfolk, England.
• The "Russian Rocket" Hypothesis: He discusses the case of an object filmed in Reñaca and Quilpué in February 1997, which split into three. He initially hypothesized it was a Russian rocket. He later refined this hypothesis in 1998 after analyzing the object's structure, suggesting it might be a Russian mission from Baikonur. He notes that CIFOV later reached similar conclusions, implying they may have plagiarized his work without proper attribution.
• The Sebastopol UFO: Fuenzalida reiterates that the rhomboidal shape was a camera artifact, despite claims from others, including Boris Chourinov, that the case was authentic and involved non-conventional phenomena.
• Düsseldorf UFO: He explains that this case was likely a blimp, a hypothesis he presented in 2000, supported by analysis of similar videos from various countries.
• "La nave de quinientos kilómetros" (The 500-kilometer ship): Fuenzalida defends his hypotheses regarding satellite photos, stating they were based on expert opinions, not his own arbitrary interpretations. He criticizes CIFOV for selectively quoting an interview without providing adequate context, particularly regarding the complexity of satellite photo analysis.

Fuenzalida concludes by listing several UFO cases he has clarified or investigated, including the "Venus wave" of 1995, sightings in Santiago, and the alleged abduction of Claudia Fuentes, which he deemed false. He emphasizes the importance of a critical interaction and mature debate in ufology, requiring thorough investigation of reports and data.

Comentarios desafortunados (Unfortunate Comments) by CIFOV (Chile)

CIFOV responds to Rodrigo Fuenzalida's critique of their article, defending their position and clarifying their stance on his work.

CIFOV begins by stating that they will respond to Fuenzalida's comments for the first and last time, as the exchange has become a polemic lacking evidence. They quote Fuenzalida's initial response to a query from "Afrodita," where he stated he had not read their article and therefore could not critique it, but would rebut any inaccuracies or prejudices disguised as research.

CIFOV then addresses Fuenzalida's points:

• Personal Stance: They acknowledge Fuenzalida's desire not to be pigeonholed by labels but question his criticism, given he had not read their article. They also note that while they had sought AION's support for projects, they received no concrete response, despite CIFOV members attending AION's conferences for free.
• Experience vs. Criticism: CIFOV refutes Fuenzalida's implicit suggestion that one needs extensive experience to offer criticism. They argue that they have conducted objective and constructive critiques without needing "medals" in ufology.
• "Chaquetear" (To criticize harshly): CIFOV interprets Fuenzalida's use of the term "chaquetear" as meaning to call things by their name, praise the positive, and criticize the negative. They embrace this label, stating that if this is what it means, then they are indeed "chaqueteros."
• "Russian Rocket" Case: CIFOV claims that Fuenzalida's hypotheses about new Russian projects were copied verbatim from various news outlets without proper source attribution, including his own errors. They state this is a known issue with him.
• Plagiarism Allegation: CIFOV challenges Fuenzalida to provide irrefutable proof of plagiarism, demanding specific evidence like news recordings or articles, rather than vague coincidences.
• Debate Level: They reiterate the need to raise the level of debate and demand proof and evidence from all involved, warning against accepting opinions solely based on an individual's reputation as an "expert."

CIFOV also addresses a specific case where Rodrigo Fuenzalida claimed a "glovin" (a type of balloon) was seen, but later, the CEFAA concluded it was a MIR balloon. CIFOV questions whether this constitutes plagiarism by CEFAA, given the similar results obtained with a time difference.

UFO Sightings in Viña del Mar

This section details a significant UFO sighting that occurred in Viña del Mar, Chile.

• The Event: Approximately forty silver-white, balloon-like objects were observed in the sky for nearly two hours, between 16:30 and 18:30. The objects moved in a perfect formation, ruling out birds. Some observers initially thought they were propaganda balloons from a children's event, but the timing and independent movement of the objects contradicted this.
• Observer Reactions: The phenomenon caused a mix of excitement, disbelief, and fear among local merchants, some of whom closed their shops.
• Expert Analysis: Enrique Silva, coordinator for the Quinta region of AION, stated that the objects were clearly UFOs or "unidentified flying objects" due to their characteristics and movements. He consulted with the Directorate of Civil Aeronautics and the Air Force, who had no official knowledge of the event, though they had received witness reports.
• Object Characteristics: The objects formed geometric shapes like squares and triangles, indicating independent movement. At one point, eight objects were seen, which then merged. Later, up to forty objects were counted. They disappeared simultaneously, which was considered extraordinary.
• Possible Explanations: Silva suggested that such appearances are often linked to social or natural crises, referring to them as "causal UFOs." He noted similarities to sightings in Mexico prior to a solar eclipse and recent strange phenomena reported in various Chilean cities following an earthquake in Iquique.
• Further Investigation: A subsequent sighting on November 27 involved a silver object, approximately 30 meters in diameter, filmed on the road to La Pólvora.
• Meteorological Consultation: The local newspaper contacted the Navy's Meteorology Service and Naval Aviation, who reported no official complaints or inquiries about the sightings, except for those reported in the news.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently adopts a critical and analytical stance towards both religious sects and ufological phenomena. It questions established narratives, encourages rigorous investigation, and highlights the importance of evidence-based reasoning. The editorial team appears to favor open debate and the presentation of diverse viewpoints, even when they are critical or controversial. There's a clear emphasis on distinguishing between speculation and well-supported research, particularly in the complex field of ufology. The magazine also seems to champion the idea that mainstream religious institutions may not always hold the complete truth and that alternative spiritual experiences, often found in sects or through direct mystical encounters, hold significant value, even if they are not always conventional or easily explained.

Title: LA NAVE DE LOS LOCOS
Issue: N° 11
Date: Septiembre de 2001
Theme: The magazine explores the intersection of science, religion, and skepticism, particularly concerning UFO phenomena and ancient mysteries.

¿Es Benítez un extraterrestre camuflado? by Luis Alfonso Gámez

This article critically examines the work of ufologist Juan José Benítez, author of 'Mis ovnis favoritos'. Gámez, a self-proclaimed skeptical ufologist, argues that Benítez's latest book is merely a collection of blurry UFO photos and simplistic answers to children's questions, demonstrating a lack of serious evidence. Gámez suggests that Benítez's character has become so ingrained that he may be a 'camouflaged extraterrestrial' himself, or that his 'open mind' has allowed an alien entity to influence him. The article also touches upon Benítez's claim that the Moon landings were hindered by radioactivity and that advanced aliens can create perfect human replicas. Gámez posits that Benítez's reluctance to present concrete proof, despite claiming to have it, is part of a strategy to maintain his public persona and financial success.

El fracaso de la invasión extraterrestre by Enrique Symms

Enrique Symms, writing for a Chilean newspaper, explores the idea that the concept of extraterrestrial invasion is a modern manifestation of ancient human desires to find meaning and companionship in a vast universe. He argues that as religion waned, science became the new framework for explaining the unknown, leading to the creation of metaphysical entities and visitors. Symms suggests that the failure of extraterrestrials to 'invade' Earth has led them to manifest through television and the work of ufologists, who act as their 'ambassadors'. He posits that the human need to avoid existential solitude drives the projection of gods and extraterrestrials onto the cosmic screen, a process he views as a degradation of our own enigmatic existence.

ESTUDIOSOS DE LA NADA

This section critiques ufologists for studying phenomena that lack credible evidence. It highlights Mexican journalist Jaime Maussán's claims about alien signals and Ecuadorian ufologist Jaime Rodríguez's assertions about UFOs in Ecuador. Symms argues that while UFO sightings exist, there is no credible testimony to determine their origin or nature. He introduces Carl Gustav Jung's concept of 'cognitive superposition,' where observers project their expectations onto what they see, invalidating objective observation. Symms criticizes the manipulation of these beliefs by self-proclaimed ufologists, turning the phenomenon into a spectacle of debate and controversy.

SE VENDE UN ET AUTOGRAFIADO

A brief note about an autographed alien figure signed by Betty Hill, a famous abduction witness, being sold for $950.

¿OVNI? ¡JA! ¡ERA VENUS!

This section clarifies that a previously reported UFO sighting at a supermarket was actually the planet Venus, a conclusion also reached by the German UFO group CENAP.

INGENIEROS DE LA ANTIGÜEDAD by Mario Méndez Acosta

This article critically examines claims of 'ancient astronauts' and extraterrestrial involvement in the construction of ancient monuments. Acosta, an engineer, argues that human civilization developed through a long process of learning and innovation, spanning millions of years. He refutes the idea that ancient peoples lacked the intelligence or capability to achieve feats like calculating astronomical movements or building complex structures. Acosta emphasizes that the evidence points to a gradual evolution of human ingenuity, from basic tools to sophisticated architecture, and that attributing these achievements to aliens is a misinterpretation of the vast timescale of human development.

Los atlantes de Tula, ¿con armas al cinto?

A caption under an image suggests that the Atlanteans of Tula might have possessed advanced weaponry.

This section details the engineering and construction methods of ancient civilizations, particularly Egypt. Acosta discusses the development of tools, irrigation, and astronomical knowledge. He addresses the 'sudden' appearance of civilizations like Egypt, explaining it as a result of thousands of years of consolidation rather than an instantaneous event. He argues that the origin of engineering is lost in time but not inherently mysterious, emphasizing the long learning process involved.

CIELOS ANTIGUOS

This section aims to critically address claims about 'ancient astronauts,' lost continents, and humans coexisting with dinosaurs, without dismissing the potential for genuine mystery in the remote past.

The Pyramids of Egypt

Acosta argues that the pyramids of Egypt are a testament to human evolution and gradual development, not alien intervention. He describes the process from mastabas to stepped pyramids, highlighting the trial-and-error involved in construction. He refutes the idea of alien technology, stating that the pyramids were built using relatively primitive tools and techniques available at the time. He explains the quarrying and transportation of materials, including limestone and granite, and the use of wooden wedges, copper chisels, and abrasives. Importantly, he notes that the labor was voluntary, not slave labor, as often claimed.

Sai Baba: pequeños milagros, grandiosas pretensiones by Sergio Sánchez R.

This article provides a critical look at the spiritual guru Sai Baba. The author's friend visited Puthapartti, Sai Baba's city, and observed his followers. The author expresses astonishment at Sai Baba's global success, suggesting his charisma is the primary factor, as his teachings are seen as derivative of other spiritual figures. The article criticizes Sai Baba's physical appearance as not particularly spiritual and questions his 'divine incarnation' status. It highlights the extensive propaganda surrounding Sai Baba and notes the lack of acknowledgment of accusations circulating on the internet, particularly concerning alleged sexual misconduct with male devotees.

"Humano, demasiado humano"

This section introduces the author's friend's experiences in India and her visit to Puthapartti, noting her lack of a private audience with Sai Baba.

The 'Miracles' of Sai Baba

The article details accusations of Sai Baba's sexual abuse, where he allegedly 'fixed' devotees' Kundalini. It also discusses his alleged 'miracles,' such as materializing divine ash (vibhuti) and gold watches. The author dismisses these as trivial and materialistic, especially in the context of widespread poverty in India. The article mentions the Union Rationalist India's investigation, which allegedly exposed Sai Baba as a fraud, even on Indian television. Despite this, his followers remain devoted, prioritizing his 'message' over the alleged deception.

MURIÓ FRED HOYLE

This section pays tribute to Sir Fred Hoyle, an astrophysicist, novelist, and polemicist. It highlights his scientific contributions, including demonstrating how stars produce elements and his work on the origin of life, which he believed came from outer space (panspermia). Hoyle was a staunch opponent of the Big Bang theory, coining the term ironically. He advocated for a continuous creation model of the universe. The article notes that Hoyle eventually conceded some points due to evidence like the cosmic microwave background radiation, proposing a 'little bangs' theory before his death.

Recibimos: EL OJO CRÍTICO Nº 32/33

This is a review of the publication 'El Ojo Crítico' (EOC), edited by Manuel Carballal. The reviewer notes a self-referential tendency in EOC, with articles and interviews focusing on Carballal himself and his book 'Los expedientes secretos del CESID.' The review mentions articles by Rafael Cabello and José Manuel García, who are described as well-intentioned but overly credulous ufologists. The reviewer also criticizes the publication's writing and spelling errors, which detract from its appeal.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently adopts a skeptical and critical stance towards claims of extraterrestrial visitation, pseudoscientific theories, and spiritual gurus. It emphasizes scientific reasoning and evidence-based analysis, often debunking popular myths and exposing alleged frauds. The editorial stance appears to favor rational inquiry and critical thinking over blind faith or sensationalism, particularly in the realm of ufology and paranormal phenomena.

Title: LA NAVE DE LOS LOCOS
Issue: Nº 11
Volume: Año 2
Date: Septiembre de 2001
Publisher: LA NAVE DE LOS LOCOS
Country: Chile
Type: Bi-monthly bulletin, independently edited.

Editorial Content

El Ojo Crítico Review

The issue opens with a critical review of 'El Ojo Crítico,' a publication that is seen as deviating from journalistic objectivity and embracing trends from the Vatican, while also being accused of spreading falsehoods. The reviewer, Diego Zúñiga C., notes that while 'El Ojo Crítico' has improved in format, its recent editions show a regression, potentially hindering diverse opinions in the paranormal debate. The reviewer hopes this is a temporary setback.

Received Publications

• A list of other publications received includes:
• Magonia N° 75 (July 2001) - featuring articles on UFO photo authenticity and experimental UFO hoaxing.
• Magonia Supplement N° 36 (June 30, 2001) - covering UFO crashes.
• Suplemento Internacional CdU, N° 7 (2001) - discussing UFO monsters, dark ages, and the 'Martian' face.
• Ufología Racional (Argentina) - issues 1, 2, and 3/4.

Breves: ¡Sorpresa! Sims Mintió

This section addresses claims made by American abductee Derrel Sims during a visit to Chile. Sims asserted that metallic fragments attributed to aliens were being analyzed by NIDS. However, Gustavo Rodríguez of CEFAA contacted NIDS, who confirmed that in 1996 they analyzed a supposed implant and found no unusual metallic samples or evidence of extraterrestrial origin. NIDS stated that Sims' information is false. The article provides a link to the NIDS analysis for readers to draw their own conclusions, framing it as a contribution from CEFAA to critical ufology.

Debate sobre Sectas en los "Animatronics"

An account of a debate held on July 29th at 'Animatronics' in Estación Mapocho, Santiago, concerning 'sectas platillistas' (UFO cults). The panel included Juan Guillermo Prado, Humberto Lagos, Rodrigo Fuenzalida, and the author (S.S.). The author expresses disagreements with the approaches of Prado and Lagos, while Fuenzalida maintained a more equidistant position. Despite deep divergences, the debate was respectful, fostering an exchange of information and a desire to repeat the event with a broader audience.

Book Review: "Expedientes insólitos" by Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos

This extensive review by Diego Zúñiga C. discusses the book "Expedientes insólitos" (Unusual Files) by Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos, published in 1995. The reviewer questions the relevance of a six-year-old book but concludes it is highly valuable, especially for critical ufology. Ballester is presented as a prominent Spanish ufologist, known for his rational approach and work with the 'Valencian School of Ufology.' The book is described as a compilation of articles, updated by the author, focusing on cases investigated by the Spanish Air Force. It is positioned as a rational response to speculative works like Juan José Benítez's "Materia Reservada." The review highlights that Ballester clarifies many 'mysteries,' often attributing them to confusions, meteorites, Venus, or outright lies, rather than extraterrestrial phenomena. The book also includes basic premises for researchers, an overview of Spanish ufology, and a section on the work of psychologist Richard Haines, with an epilogue by Jacques Vallée. The reviewer recommends the book for those seeking a clear and honest view of the declassification of Spanish UFO files, cautioning against it for those who prefer enigma and absurd mystery.

Lo Prometido: ¿Qué Pasó en los Animatronics?

This section provides a more detailed report on the I International Ufology Encounter held at Estación Mapocho in July. The event, described as having more lows than highs, featured Mario Dussuel discussing esoteric speculation and 'foo fighters.' Sergio Sánchez of La Nave questioned Dussuel's claims and the role of ufologists in creating UFO myths. Fabián Sáez of AION offered a general scientific perspective. The organizers controversially included Antonio Ramírez, who presented alleged UFO metal fragments without justification. Derrel Sims concluded the event with a presentation on 'extraterrestrial implants,' which the author found to be more show than substance. The report suggests the event revealed the true level of some ufologists.

Erratas and Next Issue Preview

An errata corrects a typo on page 41 ('fenóimeno' to 'fenómeno'). The preview for the next issue (Nº 12, November 2001) announces a special dossier on abductions, along with articles on UFOs in Chilean history and a response from CIFOV to Pedro Muñoz.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

La Nave de los Locos consistently promotes a critical and rational approach to ufology. The magazine distinguishes between rigorous investigation and speculative or commercially driven paranormal content. It actively debunks unsubstantiated claims, as seen in the reporting on Derrel Sims and the critique of 'El Ojo Crítico.' The publication values objective analysis and the declassification of official UFO files, positioning itself as a source for serious researchers rather than those seeking sensationalism. The editorial stance emphasizes intellectual honesty and a commitment to discerning fact from fiction within the field of ufology.