Kosmologi - 1960 10

Magazine Overview

Title: Kosmologi
Issue Date: October 1960
Publisher: S.U.F.O.I. (Scandinavian UFO-investigation)
Country: Denmark

This issue of Kosmologi, a publication from S.U.F.O.I., delves into a range of profound topics including peace, religion, ufology, and the perils of nationalism. The cover art features a striking visual representation of a UFO, an unidentified elongated object, and a planetary system, setting a tone of cosmic and scientific inquiry.

Editorial: A Message from the Editor

The issue opens with a personal address from the editor, Gerda Rørbæk Nielsen. She shares news of a recent visit to Copenhagen by the English engineer and researcher, Mr. De la Warr. De la Warr presented a demonstration of his results achieved through 'thought-radiations,' which he uses to photograph the world behind atoms. While acknowledging the seemingly fantastic nature of this work, Nielsen emphasizes that De la Warr's experiments are strictly scientific and have been verified by leading physicians and scientists worldwide. The article mentions that Dr. Phil. Poul Goos has documented De la Warr's findings in a book titled 'Hinsides vor verden' (Beyond our world). A detailed report on De la Warr's visit will be featured in the next issue of Kosmologi, written by Lilli Christensen, aiming to introduce his groundbreaking discoveries to a wider audience.

Article: Fred på jorden (Peace on Earth)

This extensive article critically examines the concept of peace and the societal resistance to it. The author argues that advocating for peace, or even religion, often leads to ridicule and suspicion. Individuals who champion peace are labeled with derogatory terms like 'lukewarm,' 'bad patriot,' 'pacifist,' or 'communist,' and are accused of wanting foreign domination or even fascism. The concept of disarmament is dismissed as naive, with the pervasive propaganda from 'arms magnates' convincing the masses that weapon production is necessary to prevent unemployment. The article highlights the paradox of overflowing arms depots and continuous production, noting that these weapons are ultimately destined for destruction. It criticizes the arms industry for profiting from conflict and views the stockpiling of weapons as a 'bottomless saving' of national capital that serves no purpose other than destruction. The author laments that politicians are adept at manipulating public perception, leading to the vilification of peace advocates as traitors. The piece suggests that the deep-seated 'money and power lust' blinds people to the reality of this 'rot.' It criticizes the manipulation of 'fatherland love' to incite conflict and describes nationalism as a dangerous, sentimental feeling that can lead to destruction, citing the example of Nazi Germany. Albert Schweitzer is quoted, stating that the discussion of which nation bears the greatest guilt for war is meaningless, as nationalism itself is the direct cause of war. The article questions whether people will ever realize the absurdity of killing for the sake of the arms industry's profits and politicians' lust for power. It posits that if people refused to be 'puppets' of the unscrupulous, peace would naturally follow. The author laments that young men are sent to war, causing immense suffering to mothers, driven by false ideals and the fear of being labeled cowards, despite most not wishing to harm others. History is presented as evidence that war never solves problems but exacerbates them, leading to a future where war could result in the annihilation of humanity.

The article further explores the dark side of human nature, stating that war brings out the worst instincts, reminiscent of a 'jungle' mentality where the strongest prevail. Peter Clarke is quoted describing war as a descent into a primitive state, destroying beauty, brotherhood, and driving God from human hearts. Wars are seen as losses for all involved, including the victors, the living, the dead, and the nations themselves, who, through their 'social imbecility' and 'political incompetence,' resolve disputes with violence. The article contends that war falsely equates brutality with heroism, madness with manliness, and mass murder with patriotism. It has filled the world with envy, hatred, fear, and tears, resulting in widespread bloodshed, crippled individuals, and the threat of devastating thermobaric explosions that endanger future generations. War creates widows and orphans, destroys homes and hopes, and elevates murderers and warmongers above teachers and artists. It is depicted as organized power and cruelty that tramples on religion and the weak, with its only creed being 'might is right.' The author concludes this section by stating that the 'bloody monster' of war continues to demand more victims, even amidst the devastation.

The author then reflects on individual and collective power to change destiny, particularly concerning war. The idea of an 'invisible mark of Cain' on humanity's forehead is introduced, suggesting a predisposition to hate and engage in fratricide, possibly stemming from participation in past wars. The question is posed whether humanity was born in this era specifically to face the threat of annihilation by the hydrogen bomb. Despite the uncertainty, the article stresses that individuals have the power to avert this fate through positive thoughts, words, and actions, creating a chain reaction of love. The Earth is called 'the planet of darkness,' but the author expresses hope that it can be transformed into a 'planet of peace, happiness, and beauty.' This transformation requires a broader perspective, expanding one's love from their country to humanity and then to the entire solar system.

Article: Religion, videnskab og ufologi (Religion, Science, and Ufology)

This article examines the complex relationship between religion, science, and ufology in contemporary society. The author notes that the word 'religion' has become almost taboo in modern, 'perverted' societies, questioning how a concept once held in deep reverence has fallen into disrepute. The article posits that religion has become a subject of interest only to theologians and a few zealous sects.

Ufologists are presented as being divided into two camps: one that strictly rejects any religious significance in extraterrestrial visitations, and another that attempts to fit UFOs into a narrow, sectarian framework. The author criticizes both approaches as misguided and indicative of conceptual confusion. While acknowledging the tragic nature of this division, the author finds it somewhat amusing to hear the 'downright insane,' sectarian interpretations attributed to 'space people.' However, the potential damage to UFO research is not to be underestimated. The article suggests that as UFO research matures, it will become more normalized, with most ufologists becoming healthy, rational individuals, while the extreme sects will fade away.

A more serious concern arises when 'sober' ufologists dismiss any connection between UFOs and religion. The author argues that this indicates a profound ignorance, not only of what UFOs represent (which is understandable ignorance) but also of the nature of religion itself (which is less excusable ignorance). These 'sober' ufologists are characterized as being detached from public perception, a common phenomenon where the majority is often wrong. They are described as recognizing only matter, having forgotten that matter and spirit are two sides of the same coin. By focusing solely on the physical aspects of UFOs, they exclude themselves from the truth.

The article advocates for a holistic approach in UFO research, where spirit and matter are considered together, offering a slim hope of finding genuine truth. It suggests that ufologists who only acknowledge the physical aspects of UFOs are denying life itself, as life is spirit manifesting in matter. These ufologists are urged to look within themselves and recognize their own consciousness, which creates, governs, and shapes the material world. Without consciousness, the physical world would become inert. Consciousness is described as the most real aspect of existence, yet it is purely spiritual, intangible, and immeasurable. It is present in all humans to varying degrees, and its departure leaves behind only a lifeless body.

The author extends this concept of consciousness to the universe, suggesting that the 'consciousness of space,' or the 'spirit of space,' forms a unified whole – the sacred and mysterious life itself. This understanding is presented as a direct path to 'the gates of God,' which is religion. The existence of physical beings from space, similar to humans, is seen as evidence of the divine harmony in the universe's creation and growth, which is also religion. The advanced technical capabilities of 'space people' are linked to their high spiritual development, indicating a continuous evolution towards higher states of being. Recognizing this connection is presented as religion.

In essence, the article argues that the moment a ufologist acknowledges the presence of consciousness behind UFO sightings, they are, consciously or unconsciously, admitting that religion is intrinsically linked to the UFO phenomenon. Therefore, UFO research inevitably leads to religion, and many honest individuals involved in this field understand this connection without needing to force it out of view.

Article: Tolerance

This article defines tolerance not as passive acceptance or agreement with everything, but as an active effort to understand the innermost being of individuals, regardless of their opinions or interests. The author distinguishes tolerance from mere indifference, emphasizing that true tolerance involves understanding and empathy.

Fordomsfrihed (freedom from prejudice) is presented as a close relative of tolerance. A person free from prejudice does not become easily offended. Offense is described as a tool of hypocrisy, causing irreparable harm throughout history. Intolerance, conversely, celebrates dubious triumphs in a world characterized by egoism, intolerance, hatred, and discrimination.

The article acknowledges the vast diversity of people, making the concept of a 'modern, conformist human' seem almost laughable. However, it identifies a form of passive tolerance that stands in stark contrast to the 'aggressive world' that appears more immediate and vocal. This conformist individual, while seemingly harmless, is characterized by a lack of self-awareness regarding their own comfort at the expense of others and a significant erosion of their independence, which could lead to personal and societal downfall.

The true, tolerant person is described as awake, clear-sighted, and action-oriented. Genuine tolerance manifests as a clear stance on issues, but without judgment. While it may be easy to be tolerant when not engaging with serious problems, the article emphasizes the importance of delving into the root causes of the world's societal ills. The true tolerant individual seeks to understand these problems, yet remains capable of navigating them with a clear mind and heart, ready to fight for life and the future of Earth. This fight must be waged without intolerance, greed, or a desire for personal gain or high social status. This, the author concludes, is the spirit of the true, selfless, and tolerant human being.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of Kosmologi consistently promotes a worldview that transcends narrow nationalistic perspectives and embraces a broader understanding of humanity and the universe. The editorial stance is critical of nationalism, viewing it as a primary driver of conflict and a significant obstacle to peace. The magazine advocates for a holistic approach to understanding phenomena, particularly in the realm of ufology, urging readers to integrate scientific inquiry with spiritual and religious perspectives. Tolerance is presented as a virtue essential for societal progress and individual growth, contrasting it with the divisiveness of intolerance and prejudice. The overarching message is one of interconnectedness, urging readers to expand their consciousness beyond self-interest and national boundaries towards a universal perspective.

Title: KOSMOLOGI
Issue: Ræserforum
Date: Not specified

This document is a letter from Per Borgaard to Kai Neumann, published in the reader forum of 'Kosmologi'. It addresses philosophical and existential themes, particularly concerning human potential, the nature of reality, and the path to progress.

Letter from Per Borgaard to Kai Neumann

Per Borgaard begins by responding to Kai Neumann's apparent view that he is a pessimist. Borgaard states that he has brought up some unpleasant points in the 'Kosmologi' reader forum, leaving it to others to judge his perspective.

He then discusses the idea that our thoughts can only engage with what we can achieve or obtain. While acknowledging this as a pleasant theory, Borgaard asserts that the three-dimensional world is different. He argues that training oneself to think only in positive ways can influence others, but it is not enough. The quantity of negative thoughts is seemingly as large as positive ones, and more tangible things are needed to truly influence development.

Borgaard contrasts past methods of problem-solving, which involved wars, with the present. He warns that using war as a method today would be a death sentence for humanity. He also addresses the idea of loving one's neighbor, suggesting that while people may not fully understand the concept, they do feel a degree of this love towards their closest relatives, and this feeling simply needs to be cultivated.

Challenging Kai Neumann's assertion that humans are perfect, Borgaard states that he himself is not perfect, nor has he ever met a perfect person, despite encountering many fine individuals. He references Adamski's book "Inside the Spaceships" (Ombord i rumskibe), which reportedly states that even space people are not perfect. Borgaard interprets Neumann's idea of perfection as being created in God's image. He hopes this is true but notes that a copy, however detailed, is never as perfect as the original. He questions how limited, material beings like humans could be perfect when compared to an infinite, spiritual being.

Borgaard suggests that creating perfection is easy in an ideal world by ignoring difficulties, but the real world presents a different scenario. He stresses the importance of keeping a long-term perspective on development, but also emphasizes that to reach the level of 'space people,' significant work must be done in the present.

He clarifies that 'space people' are not fantasy beings living in an escapist world but are real people who have dared to face reality and change it. Their success, he argues, does not make their world less real.

In conclusion, Borgaard asserts that it is not thoughts but deeds that are required today. People must decide their direction and work towards it. He advocates for open minds and an understanding of how best to benefit fellow human beings and, consequently, themselves, rather than resorting to oriental fatalism.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The main themes explored in this letter are the limitations of positive thinking without action, the nature of human perfection, the contrast between ideal and real worlds, and the necessity of practical deeds for progress. The editorial stance, as represented by the publication of this letter in 'Kosmologi', appears to be open to philosophical discussions on human potential, spirituality, and the implications of encounters with non-human intelligence, encouraging a grounded, action-oriented approach to self-improvement and societal development.