Klipprunden - 1995 10 10

Magazine Overview

This document is a compilation of clippings and updates from UFO-NORGE, presented in a newsletter format titled 'Klipprunden' (Clipping Round), dated 10.10.95. The editor, Odd-Gunnar Røed, apologizes for the delay, citing significant UFO-related activity and media attention, particularly concerning the 'Roswell Incident'. The newsletter aims to provide constructive UFO work despite frequent media inquiries.

Content Highlights

New Book: "Without Consent"

The newsletter strongly recommends the book "Without Consent" by Philip Mantle and Carl Nagaitis, describing it as a 'must' for anyone interested in UFO phenomena, especially 4th-degree close encounters. It is available for purchase through UFO-NORGE.

UFO Films

UFO-NORGE has amassed 47 UFO films, with "A-38" being highlighted for its coverage of the 1991 Mexico City solar eclipse, filmed from 17 angles and showing a large, rotating object. The Roswell films are also mentioned as particularly interesting. A film titled "A-40" is noted as being BUFORA's film based on lectures, featuring the editor among world leaders.

UFO-NORGE Merchandise

A new UFO-NORGE t-shirt is available, designed for both humans and dogs. The design, initially misunderstood, is clarified to be a photo taken in Hessdalen.

Upcoming Events and Operations

The next 'Klipprunde' will be sent from Tønsberg, with the old address serving as the reporting center. There are also plans for lectures on the North Sea, with Statoil as the client, targeting Gullfaks A, B, and C.

Publication Schedule

Issue number 3 of the journal will be a double issue (3/4) due to the editor's workload, to be released in mid-November. It will contain the promised 144 pages.

Discussion on Rauni Leena Luukanen

The newsletter addresses reader reactions to their treatment of Rauni Leena Luukanen, noting a divided opinion. The editor defends their critical stance, stating they would not criticize without good reason and aim to highlight issues like lack of sources and misinformation, referencing an article series by Ole Jonny Brænnes.

Field Researcher Manual

The 'Field Researcher Manual' is ready and priced at 50 kr. Those interested are encouraged to contact UFO-NORGE. A test will be administered to those who wish to become field researchers, with successful candidates receiving an ID card.

Crop Circle Hysteria in Norway

Norway has become the 37th country to experience crop circle phenomena. The 'Oppland Arbeiderblad' newspaper extensively covered the topic before two individuals confessed to creating them. The crop circles are described as not professionally executed, unlike the more precise English examples.

Film Analysis and Reviews

Several films are reviewed, including "A-23" which documents the creation of crop circles. The issue mentions a 'Roswell clip' and features Leif Normann Solhaug. It also references articles from 'Adresseavisen' in Trondheim, discussing UFOs.

Media Coverage of UFOs

Extensive media coverage of UFO cases is noted, with VG's 'X-tra-serie' and Glåmdalen's serials mentioned. The issue touches upon the 'puddelen' from Ullevålsveien and references various individuals involved in UFO research and reporting, including Ole Jonny, Rutt Mary, Åge Moe, Martin Aspås, Bjarne Lillevold, and groups from Østfold.

Unexplained Phenomena and Media Skepticism

An unexplained hole on the west coast and a videofilmed object are mentioned. The Roswell film is discussed, with the editor suggesting that skepticism often stems from a lack of prior knowledge and that the film deserves proper investigation beyond mere dismissal.

Internet and UFO Information

The internet is described as a source of rumors and claims without sources, operating under a 'divide and conquer' strategy.

X-Files Mention

The popular TV series 'X-Files' is briefly mentioned, with Ole Jonny Brænnes noted for his grounded approach to the show.

Film List

A comprehensive list of films available for rent from UFO-NORGE is provided, categorized by type (text or no text) and price. This list includes titles such as "UFOS ARE REAL", "MYSTERIES OF THE GODS", "THE CASE OF UFOS", "THE ROSWELL CRASH", "COMMUNION", and "INTRUDERS", among many others. The rental service emphasizes prompt return to avoid delays.

Roswell Film Analysis

The 'Roswell film' is described as a 30-minute interview followed by footage shown in slow motion for detail. The film is available for purchase for 350 kr, including postage from England. UFO-NORGE receives 50 kr for each film sold. A film analysis by Bob Shell confirms the film's 1947 origin, and the cameraman's account will be translated and published in the next issue.

Closing Remarks

Odd-Gunnar Røed signs off, promising to send the next clipping round more promptly. A humorous anecdote about a 'ray' found by Philip Mantle is also included.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, close encounters, the Roswell incident, crop circles, and the analysis of UFO-related films and books. The editorial stance, as expressed in the discussion about Rauni Leena Luukanen, is critical and evidence-based, emphasizing the importance of good reasons and sources before making claims. There is a clear effort to promote UFO-NORGE's services, including film rentals and merchandise, and to engage subscribers with updates and new materials. The publication also highlights the challenges of dealing with media skepticism and the spread of misinformation in the UFO field.

Title: Arbeiderbladet
Issue Date: August 23, 1995
Volume: 72
Issue Number: 193
Price: Kr. 10.00

This issue of Arbeiderbladet delves deeply into the world of UFO phenomena, featuring a prominent cover story on 'UFO tracks in fields' and revisiting the enduring mystery of the Roswell incident. The magazine explores recent crop circle formations in Norway and examines the claims surrounding the alleged crash of an extraterrestrial spacecraft in New Mexico in 1947.

UFO-spor i åker: Er det bare en spøk?

The lead article, 'UFO-spor i åker: Er det bare en spøk?' by Martin Gray, discusses the appearance of large, geometric crop circles in Norwegian fields, specifically at Elton gård near Raufoss and at Hvam on Romerike. These formations, characterized by flattened crops arranged in precise patterns, have sparked public curiosity. However, Ole Jonny Brænne from UFO Norge dismisses them as a 'guaranteed hoax,' suggesting they are likely created by pranksters rather than extraterrestrial visitors. He notes that while such phenomena are rare in Norway, they have been extensively debunked in England. The article details how the crops are broken at the root, indicating human intervention, and questions the motive behind such elaborate pranks.

UFO-spor i åker er garantert bløff!

This section reiterates the skepticism surrounding the crop circles. UFO expert Ole Jonny Brænne of UFO Norge suggests that the circles could be the work of tourists or pranksters, drawing parallels to cases in England where many such incidents have been exposed as hoys. He emphasizes that while UFO Norge investigates all reports, these specific crop formations do not appear to be genuine UFO evidence. The article notes that the crops are broken at the base, a sign of manual manipulation, and that the patterns are too precise to be natural.

UFO-sjefen på Fredvang

An article by Lars Antonsen profiles Leif Normann Solhaug, who heads UFO Norge's Northern Norway department. Solhaug, a farmer from Fredvang, has amassed an archive of approximately 200 unexplained UFO cases from the region. He defines UFOs broadly as unidentified aerial phenomena, not just 'spaceships and green men.' Solhaug's interest began in 1979 after visiting Hessdalen, a known UFO hotspot. He believes that many people who witness UFOs are afraid to report them for fear of not being believed. UFO Norge aims to find explanations for these phenomena, whether natural or otherwise, and guarantees anonymity for those who come forward.

UFO-Norge: A National Organization

This brief section explains that UFO Norge is a nationwide organization founded in 1973 with 900 members. Its Northern Norway chapter covers Nordland, Troms, and Finnmark counties. The organization collects, processes, and studies UFO information, applying scientific principles to its investigations. UFO Norge is known for its involvement in 'Project Hessdalen' and considers various theories, including extraterrestrial visitation, parapsychology, and unknown natural phenomena.

Letters to the Editor and Commentary on UFOs

Several letters and commentaries discuss the nature of UFOs:

• 'Hva er UFO?' (What is a UFO?): A commentary by Odd-Gunnar Røed argues that UFOs are simply unidentified phenomena, and that people should not hide behind the term when they can identify something. He stresses the importance of seeking knowledge over blind belief.
• 'UFO og rusmisbrukarar' (UFOs and drug abusers): Helge Restum, L. A. Bakken, and Frode Grønning suggest that reported UFO sightings are linked to increased drug use, citing a correlation between the rise in reported sightings and drug consumption. They dismiss claims of extraterrestrial visitors as baseless.
• Commentary by Pål Kristian Vaag: Vaag critiques the idea of government cover-ups regarding UFOs, referencing the Roswell incident and suggesting that alleged 'flying saucers' were actually military balloons. He later implies that UFOs may be connected to human origins and the universe's concerns about humanity's treatment of Earth.
• Commentary by K. Stenødegård: Stenødegård debunks claims about UFO wreckage from Roswell, identifying it as a military balloon project ('Project Mogul'). He also discusses a case where Pål Kristian Vaag admitted to faking a UFO photograph to test ufologists.
• Commentary by Anders Lyngstad: Lyngstad argues that while many UFO sightings can be explained naturally, the remaining percentage, which he estimates at 10-20%, are significant and warrant further investigation. He criticizes the idea that UFOs are solely linked to drug use.
• 'Juks med UFO' (Cheating with UFOs): Ulf Fredrik Olsen recounts a student prank from the early 1980s where they launched homemade hot air balloons, which were then mistaken for UFOs by the public and reported in the newspaper.

The Roswell Incident: A Deep Dive

Several articles focus on the Roswell incident:

• 'Er dette et romvesen?' (Is this an alien?): This article presents claims by the British company Merlin Group that they possess authentic footage of an alien autopsy from the Roswell crash in 1947. The footage allegedly shows a small, grey-skinned humanoid with large, almond-shaped eyes and six fingers. The article discusses the skepticism surrounding the film's authenticity, with experts suggesting it could be a hoax or, if genuine, a significant historical event.
• 'VG så obduksjonsfilmen' (VG watched the autopsy film): This piece describes the content of the alleged Roswell autopsy film, detailing the appearance of the alien being and the procedure performed by individuals in protective suits. Pathologist Christopher Milroy offers his analysis, suggesting the body might be human with severe abnormalities or an extraterrestrial being, but leans towards the latter. The film's technical quality and potential dating are also discussed.
• 'Skriver bok om Roswell-mysteriet' (Writing a book about the Roswell mystery): This article features Willy Ustad, an author and former military officer, who is writing a book about the Roswell incident. Ustad believes the government's secrecy is driven by political, psychological, and religious motives. He dismisses the official explanation of a weather balloon as a cover-up and suggests the crashed object was a highly advanced craft, possibly influencing American aerospace technology.

Local UFO Sightings and Encounters

• 'EG SÅG UFO!' (I Saw a UFO!): Sylfest Haugen from Nordberg recounts seeing a red, disc-shaped object moving at high speed across the sky. He describes it as unlike any aircraft he knows and suspects it was a UFO. He has created a model of the object.
• '3. grads kontakter' (3rd degree contacts): This section details reports of close encounters with UFOs. It includes the story of two sisters in Mosjøen who claimed to have met a 'space man' and seen his flying saucer in 1954. Another account describes a UFO sighting and landing near a cabin in Reinsnos in 1992, with two small, human-like figures emerging.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine adopts a stance of cautious investigation, presenting various perspectives on UFO phenomena. While acknowledging the public's fascination and the persistence of the Roswell mystery, it also highlights skepticism and rational explanations, particularly regarding crop circles. The editorial approach seems to be to present the evidence and claims, allowing readers to draw their own conclusions, while also providing expert opinions and debunking efforts. There's a clear interest in both international UFO cases like Roswell and local sightings in Norway, reflecting a broad engagement with the subject. The recurring theme is the tension between unexplained phenomena and the human desire for rational explanations, often complicated by alleged government secrecy and the potential for hoaxes.

Title: VG (Verdens Gang)
Issue Date: Monday, July 10, 1995
Volume: 88, Issue 41
Publisher: VG
Country: Norway
Language: Norwegian
Cover Headline: JEG SÅ UFO'en (I SAW A UFO)

This issue of VG, a Norwegian newspaper, prominently features several articles and eyewitness accounts related to UFO sightings and unexplained aerial phenomena in Norway.

Eyewitness Account: Hjørdis Hokstad

The lead story on the cover details the experience of Hjørdis Hokstad, a 74-year-old woman from Hell, Norway. On July 25, 1981, at approximately 7:30-8:00 AM, she claims to have witnessed a metallic, cigar-shaped craft land in a field near her home. She describes seeing a small, humanoid figure, about 1.20-1.30 meters tall with long arms, dressed in a brown jumpsuit, walking with a waddling gait similar to astronauts on the moon. The figure entered the craft, which then took off silently, first slowly and then with increasing speed. The object became round when airborne and flew directly over her head. She noted a reddish mark on it. The craft moved from southwest to northeast at a very high speed. Hokstad believes she had a 'third-degree encounter' and that the craft and figure were from another planet. She states the area where the craft landed was burnt, but the grass was not scorched, and she found no physical traces or impressions.

Eyewitness Account: Gullbjørg Rosseland

Another significant report features Gullbjørg Rosseland (48) from Mandal, who claims her jewelry was damaged during a frightening experience in 1990. She and a friend were at a cabin near Skjernøysund when they experienced strange lights. Rosseland describes her jewelry—a 24-karat gold ring, a smaller ring, an earring, and an 18-karat gold necklace and bracelet—tearing and melting. A jeweler noted the unnatural breaks, and a specialist questioned if she had been exposed to something unusual. The jewelry could not be repaired. Rosseland also recounts seeing strange lights and a boat-like object with unusually large lights in the fjord in subsequent years, which she believes were UFOs.

Pilot's UFO Alarm

An article titled 'Widerøe-pilot i 15 000 fot slo UFO-alarm' (Widerøe Pilot at 15,000 Feet Sounded UFO Alarm) reports an incident on Tuesday, July 11, 1995. A Widerøe flight, en route from Fornebu to Brønnøysund, encountered an unknown flying object about 80 miles north of Trondheim. Captain Erik P. Risan and co-pilot observed an object to the right of their aircraft that lacked wings or a tail. The object moved silently and disappeared. They reported the sighting to the air traffic control tower at Værnes, but no military aircraft were in the area, and radar did not detect any unusual signals. The co-pilot was reportedly reluctant to discuss the incident further.

Mysterious Lights Over Oslofjord

Several reports describe unexplained phenomena over the Oslofjord on the night of July 20-21, 1995. Witnesses from Notodden to Son reported seeing intense yellow and white lights moving at high speed. Aleksander Ørum and Morten Sundstrøm from Holmestrand described two yellow lights moving parallel at high speed, emitting a faint humming sound. They estimated the objects covered 7-8 kilometers in 2-3 seconds. The Meteorological Institute also received around twenty phone calls about similar sightings, with employees witnessing oval, luminous objects moving at high speed. The Astrofysisk Institutt could not provide an explanation. The Norwegian Armed Forces stated they had no record of aircraft activity in the area at the time.

UFO Photograph from 1953

Esther Wilberg from Oslo submitted a photograph taken in Hemsedal in the spring of 1953. She claims to have captured a round, luminous object that emerged from the clouds. The object was described as being the size of the sun and emitting a reddish glow. A photographer initially suggested it might be a water droplet on the film but later confirmed it was a genuine, unexplained phenomenon. Wilberg also reported observing a silver, metallic object in 1985 or 1986.

UFO Sighting in Finnmark

Kjell Ivar Simensen, a 15-year-old amateur photographer, captured an unusual, blurry spot on a landscape photo taken near Lakselva in Finnmark on July 15, 1995. The object appeared to have towers and was in motion. The photo was examined by VG's photo department, and the magazine appeals to readers for possible explanations.

UFO-Norge and Investigations

The magazine features an interview with Ole Jonny Brænne from UFO-Norge, an organization dedicated to investigating UFO phenomena. Brænne explains that UFO-Norge receives numerous reports and attempts to find natural explanations, such as aircraft or weather phenomena. He states that they have over 3,000 reports in their archives that lack natural explanations. Brænne discusses the process of investigating landing reports, involving field researchers collecting samples. He mentions the case of the Øydeskyvatn tracks in 1991, where snow analysis revealed a lack of bacteria in the tracks. Brænne expresses a belief that life may exist elsewhere in the universe but is skeptical of 'contactee' claims and the idea of government cover-ups.

Other Accounts

Brief accounts include Solbjørg Aasbrein's experience of an intense yellow-orange light filling her room in Oslo in 1955, and Knut Sørensen's reports of loud bangs and thuds in an old house in Vestfold between 1969-1970. Kjell Martinussen recounts seeing a black, oval object over the Atlantic Ocean in 1958.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout the issue is the prevalence of unexplained aerial phenomena in Norway and the public's interest in them, drawing parallels to the TV series 'The X-Files'. The newspaper actively solicits reader accounts of strange experiences. The editorial stance appears to be one of open investigation, presenting eyewitness testimonies and expert opinions (or lack thereof) without definitively concluding that the phenomena are extraterrestrial, while acknowledging the possibility of unknown causes. The articles highlight the efforts of organizations like UFO-Norge in documenting and researching these events.

This issue of Glåmdalen, dated Friday, July 28, 1995, with issue number 103, delves into the intriguing world of UFOs and unexplained phenomena. The cover headline, "På sporet av den nye tid" (On the trail of a new era), suggests a forward-looking exploration of mysteries. The magazine features a series of articles, including a report from Evje, a deep dive into the Hessdalen Phenomenon, and a revisit to the controversial Roswell incident.

UFO på Evje?

The first article, dated July 25, 1995, from Setesdalen, reports on a sighting near Evje, Norway. Elisabeth Andreassen from Stavanger claims to have seen an unidentified flying object (UFO) south of Evje on a Thursday. She and four adults and two children in two cars are certain it was a UFO. Andreassen described the object as a "huge, silver-white cigar" that hovered silently and had no wings. At one point, a flash of light was seen before the object disappeared behind a mountain. Andreassen attempted to film the object but was unsuccessful. She admits that before this experience, she did not believe in UFOs, but now she does.

Roswell-papirer BRENT

This section, datelined Albuquerque (AP/VG), discusses the Roswell mystery. It reports that important military documents concerning the alleged 1947 Roswell UFO crash have been destroyed without authorization. US Congressman Steve Schiff stated that a new report on the case revealed that crucial documents were lost or destroyed over 40 years ago. The US Air Force maintains that the wreckage was likely part of a top-secret government project called Project Mogul, designed to detect Soviet nuclear weapons. The report indicates that only two public documents about the crash near Roswell Army Air Force Base now exist. The debate and speculation about the events in the New Mexico desert continue, with UFO enthusiasts believing the US government has tried to conceal the truth. The report also notes the destruction of administrative protocols and outgoing messages from the Roswell base between 1945 and 1949, which could have shed light on how the military handled the case.

Bløff eller et virkelig bilde?

This article, from Tuesday, July 25, 1995, explores the question of whether a film allegedly showing the autopsy of two alien beings is real. Ole Jonny Brianne from UFO-Norge is shown holding an image of the 'alien' retrieved from the internet. The article notes that since ancient times, humans have looked to the sky with wonder, perhaps seeking answers about their existence. It suggests a natural human curiosity drives people to see strange things in the sky, often interpreted as omens or visits from other planets. The article mentions alleged UFO crashes in Norway and the USA and the ongoing debate about the authenticity of the American film. UFO-Norge, founded in 1981, has over 3,000 UFO reports in its archives, with some sightings dating back to 1563. It highlights historical cases, including those reported by priest Absalon Pederssøn Beyer in Bergen in 1563, 1564, 1568, and 1569, which he interpreted as signs of death, plague, and misfortune. The article also touches upon the concept of 'UFO crashes,' with the Roswell incident being the most famous. It mentions that the US military initially admitted to finding a flying saucer but later claimed it was a weather balloon. The article concludes by referencing a new film purportedly showing the autopsy of two aliens from a 1947 crash, obtained by Englishman Ray Santini.

Da Hessdalen sa lyset

This extensive report, spanning pages 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, details the Hessdalen Phenomenon in Norway. It begins by describing the initial sightings in December 1981, which involved lights of various colors and shapes appearing over the Hessdalen valley. The phenomenon attracted significant media attention and public curiosity, with over 3,000 people visiting the valley in December 1983 after a psychic claimed an explanation would be revealed. The article notes that while some media coverage was negative, the phenomenon also brought international researchers to the area. Witnesses like Bjarne Lillevold describe seeing lights that could be red, orange, or blue-green, appearing in various shapes such as cigars, spheres, or triangles. The lights could hover for up to an hour and move at speeds exceeding 30,000 kilometers per hour. The article discusses the formation of "Prosjekt Hessdalen" (Project Hessdalen) in 1983 by five friends who wanted to conduct scientific investigations into the phenomenon. Civil engineer Erling Strand led the project, which involved using instruments like seismographs, magnetometers, and Geiger counters. In 1984, they conducted field studies and recorded 188 observations, with 53 remaining unexplained, four of which were characterized as highly remarkable. Strand concludes that the Hessdalen Phenomenon is a physical phenomenon that defies current scientific understanding. The project has also involved students from Østfold University College in developing advanced tracking equipment. The article also addresses the skepticism surrounding the phenomenon, with some suggesting natural explanations like ball lightning or car lights, which are largely dismissed by researchers. It mentions similar phenomena reported in England, Australia, USA, and Switzerland, but Hessdalen's notoriety stems from its prolonged activity and serious investigation efforts. The article also touches upon the local humor, with a UFO model placed outside a kindergarten.

Undring over hull

This article, dated August 24, 1995, reports on strange occurrences in the Rogaland district of Norway. On Borestranden, a mysterious crater was discovered that could not be explained as dug or blasted. No one in the neighborhood heard any explosion. Additionally, on the night before Sunday, the control tower at Sola received a report of a strange light phenomenon in the sky. On Friday, two inexplicable sightings of objects in the sky were made, one of which was filmed with a video camera in broad daylight. Aftenbladet viewed the footage, but no logical explanation could be provided. The article also mentions a sighting by Tor Aanonsen and friends near Stavanger, who saw two luminous spheres with intense white light moving in the sky at midnight. They described the spheres as being as large as the moon and moving silently before dissolving. Jan Egil Mæland from Stavanger reported a similar phenomenon observed from his cabin. Berit Dahl also reported seeing a bright, stationary light over Stavanger. Per Oseland, a civil engineer and associate professor at the University of Stavanger, believes these are UFOs and suggests that such phenomena may have originated on Earth, though science cannot yet explain how. He also discusses the Borestranden crater, noting its depth and diameter, and comparing it to similar craters found in Oregon, USA, where the displaced sand was found hundreds of meters away. Oseland dismisses the possibility of a meteorite impact.

UFO i Lakselv???

This brief report from Finnmark Dagblad, dated August 21, 1995, describes Kjell Ivar Simensen's experience while photographing near the mouth of the Lakselva river in Lakselv. After developing his photos, Simensen noticed a black, round object with what appeared to be an antenna moving in the sky. He stated that the autofocus captured the object, even though his eye did not register it. Simensen plans to investigate if there is a natural explanation for this midsummer night sighting.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around unexplained aerial phenomena, UFO sightings, and the scientific investigation of these events. The magazine presents a balanced approach, featuring witness accounts, expert opinions, and scientific data, while also acknowledging skepticism and the possibility of hoaxes. The editorial stance appears to be one of open-minded inquiry, encouraging readers to consider the evidence and the ongoing search for answers to these mysteries. The articles highlight the persistent human curiosity about the unknown and the challenges faced by researchers in a field often met with disbelief.

This issue of STAVANGER AFTENBLAD, dated Monday, August 21, 1995, features a prominent headline about a potential UFO sighting over Madlatua, alongside articles on a mysterious beach phenomenon, the enduring Roswell incident, and the popular TV series 'X-Files'. The publication also touches upon the Hessdalen UFO phenomenon.

UFO over Madlatua?

The lead story details an encounter by Kjell Aksdal, who claims to have witnessed and filmed a strange object in the sky over Madlatua on Friday morning. Aksdal described the object as avlang and cylinder-shaped, moving erratically with varying speed and changing appearance. He initially doubted his senses, attributing it to medication, but the video evidence prompted him to share his experience. Aksdal is hesitant to speculate on the object's nature, leaning towards a strange natural phenomenon rather than a flying saucer. Jan Lustrup of UFO Rogaland, however, identifies it as a UFO, noting the rarity of daylight UFO footage and estimating the object's length at around 40 meters. Lustrup suggests sending the video to the USA for analysis. He also shares his own recent UFO sightings, emphasizing their speed and intense light, ruling out satellites. Air traffic control at Stavanger Airport reported no radar anomalies, though they have received similar reports in the past. The Meteorological Institute could not provide an explanation, suggesting a possible weather balloon, but the Sola weather station denies launching any balloons that could match the description.

Mystisk hull på stranden (Mysterious hole on the beach)

An article by Kjell Arne Knutsen and Jonas Haarr Friestad reports on a mysterious hole discovered on Borestranden near Klepp. Inge Geir Stangeland, a local resident, believes the hole, approximately 1.5 meters deep and nearly 1 meter in diameter, could not have been made by humans. He speculates it might be from a meteorite-like object that bored into the sand. No one heard or saw anything unusual. Stangeland dismisses theories of digging or blasting, noting the hole's clean edges and lack of displaced sand. He observed signs of significant rotation on the sides, suggesting a drilling action. Stangeland is concerned about the proximity of the hole to his summer house, fearing a direct meteorite impact. He estimates the hole was created between Wednesday and Friday of the previous week, during which time his family was away.

Så UFO i Råde (Saw UFO in Råde)

This section reports on Britt Kirsten Pedersen's claim of seeing a UFO near Spareland in Råde on Saturday night. Her account is corroborated by two friends who were with her in the car. They describe the object as cylinder-shaped with small, pointed wings, and either golden/copper-colored or metallic. Britt Kirsten mentioned lights along the wings, which the others did not see. They also noted the car's headlights weakening before the sighting and a strange humming sound. The three women insist they were sober and are convinced they saw a real UFO, not a hallucination. They also experienced a significant time discrepancy, with a journey that normally takes about half an hour taking two and a half hours.

På TV 2 i kveld: Unike bilder (On TV 2 tonight: Unique images)

This segment announces a TV 2 documentary about the 'Roswell incident' scheduled for that evening. The film reportedly features unique images of 'beings from outer space' and details the events of July 2, 1947, when a UFO allegedly crashed in Roswell, New Mexico. The documentary is said to include footage from the crash site, interviews with witnesses, and images from the autopsy of four 'humanoids' or 'human-like robots' found in the wreckage. The article notes that some witnesses claimed to have been threatened by the US military for revealing what they saw. It mentions that the base commander at Roswell Army Air Field initially issued a press release stating a flying saucer had crashed, but was later ordered to retract it and claim it was a weather balloon. The US Air Force officially corrected this narrative in 1994, calling it a top-secret spy balloon. The segment highlights the enduring public interest in the Roswell mystery, even referencing an 'X-Files' episode on the topic. The sensational images are attributed to a retired film photographer who worked for the US Air Force from 1942 to 1952. Experts have reportedly examined the footage and concluded it is genuine, with medical experts agreeing the beings are not human, though the possibility of a sophisticated hoax is acknowledged.

Tror på historien (Believes the story)

Ole Gunnar Røed of UFO Norge expresses belief in the story told by the three women from the Moss district. He offers them hypnosis to help recall details, emphasizing that participation is voluntary. Røed notes that discrepancies in witness accounts are common in stressful situations. He also mentions that reports of humming sounds and malfunctioning lights in cars are consistent with other UFO sighting reports. Røed stresses the importance of letting the witnesses decide how to proceed.

Bløff eller ekte? (Hoax or real?)

This section delves deeper into the Roswell incident, featuring opinions from various experts. Odd Gunnar Røed (44), head of UFO Norge's report center, is more convinced of the film's authenticity after seeing it. He believes it depicts an autopsy from 1947 of a non-human being. Røed attended a conference in Sheffield where the footage was shown, noting the mixed reactions from the press. He points out that the beings in the film lacked human characteristics like navels or nipples and appeared androgynous. He suggests the footage might show evidence of genetic manipulation or cloning, given the existence of recordings of two different beings. Røed hopes the documentary will encourage witnesses to come forward with definitive proof. He vouches for the credibility of the retired photographer, Jack B., who claims to have filmed the events and kept a diary, stating he had no prior interest in UFOs. Røed also mentions a piece of wreckage with a six-fingered handprint and strange symbols, which the British UFO Research Association sought to decipher.

Ler bevis? (Is it proof?)

This article reiterates the TV 2 documentary's focus on the Roswell case, presenting it as potential evidence of extraterrestrial visitation. It notes the widespread sale of copies of the alleged footage. The article mentions that the incident occurred near Roswell in July 1947, involving an unknown object and four 'humanoids'. It highlights the initial military confirmation of a 'flying saucer' crash, later retracted. The Roswell mystery is described as a classic UFO story, with around 300 people having shared their experiences. The article also references a 1994 US Air Force report that identified the crashed object as a top-secret spy balloon, following pressure from Congress. Experts like Arne Pedersen, a film restorer, are skeptical, stating the film quality and lack of dated elements make it difficult to authenticate. He suggests it could be a doll or a misformed human, given the expertise in 'special effects' in the US. Pedersen maintains an open mind but leans towards the possibility of a military experiment gone wrong. Sivilingeniør Erik Tandberg is highly skeptical, calling the documentary 'thin stuff'. He finds the initial retraction of the UFO report plausible but doubts the possibility of keeping such a large event secret for so long. He also questions the discrepancy in witness accounts regarding the number of fingers and the sudden appearance of the object without prior radar detection. Researcher Terje Wahl dismisses the satellite theory, noting that satellites were not developed until much later. He calls the documentary an interesting popular program. Odd Gunnar Røed remains cautious, awaiting laboratory analysis of the film. He finds the documentary's commentary lacking and misses footage of a second autopsy. Professor Inge Morild, a forensic pathologist, believes the film is a forgery, citing inconsistencies in witness testimonies and the lack of clear evidence in the brief footage. He suggests the bodies might show signs of genetic deformities but finds them too adult-like for cloning. He acknowledges the possibility of something unusual happening at Roswell but leans towards a hoax.

Tre av vesenene var i live (Three of the beings were alive)

This section presents an account from a retired film photographer, identified only as Jack B., who claims to have witnessed three live beings at the Roswell crash site in 1947. He describes the beings as screaming and protecting boxes they held. Jack B. was ordered by generals to film the site, which he describes as a large, disc-shaped object radiating heat. He notes the beings were eventually moved, and the wreckage was taken to Wright Patterson for analysis. Jack B. claims to have filmed three autopsies, the first two in July 1947 and the third nearly two years later. He also mentions finding wreckage with a six-fingered handprint and strange symbols.

«X-Files» er FRI FANTASI ('X-Files' is FREE FANTASY)

This article reviews the TV series 'X-Files', which features FBI agents Fox Mulder and Dana Scully investigating unexplained phenomena allegedly drawn from FBI archives. The article quotes three Norwegians who follow the series: Ole Johnny Brænna of UFO Norge, who finds the show's credibility to be 'null' and believes it uses UFO folklore without much connection to reality, though he watches it for entertainment. May Grethe Lerum, author of 'Livets døtre', enjoys the psychological aspects of the episodes but is not convinced about aliens. She finds 'X-Files' to be well-made entertainment. Olav Brennsund of the Norwegian Society for Parapsychology finds the paranormal phenomena in 'X-Files' to be overly dramatized for entertainment purposes.

Hallo - Er det noen der ute? (Hello - Is anyone out there?)

This piece focuses on the Hessdalen UFO phenomenon, interviewing Leif Havik, author of 'UFO-fenomenet'. Havik describes the Hessdalen UFOs as appearing in various forms (flaming balls, luminous spheres, cigars, eggs, triangles, even resembling Norwegian rye bread) and being visible in all weather conditions, times of day, and seasons. They can hover or disappear with incredible speed, often extinguishing lights when approached by aircraft or when targeted with lights. The objects have been registered on radar and photographed. Havik dismisses mundane explanations like aircraft lights, ball lightning, or mirages, stating that UFOs do not fly backward or erratically along valleys without sound. He believes there is intelligent control behind the phenomena, citing instances where lights were dimmed or extinguished when he directed lights or instruments towards them. Havik suggests the beings might not be from another planet but from another time, possibly existing in a state of dematerialization. He recounts personal experiences of observing the same UFO with multiple groups simultaneously and his dog showing fear. He also mentions other alleged close encounters in Norway and the Roswell incident. While acknowledging the possibility of mass suggestion, Havik dismisses it after his own observations. He notes that while UFO sightings in Hessdalen have decreased, people are becoming better at distinguishing explainable phenomena. He concludes by stating his primary interest is understanding the 'why' behind these occurrences.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue consistently explores the unexplained, with a focus on UFO sightings and the Roswell incident. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious inquiry, presenting witness accounts and expert opinions, but often leaning towards skepticism regarding definitive proof, particularly concerning the Roswell footage. The articles encourage critical thinking and investigation while acknowledging the public's fascination with these topics. The inclusion of the TV series 'X-Files' reflects the contemporary cultural interest in UFOs and the paranormal.

This issue of VI MENN, dated September 19, 1995, number 38, is a special edition focusing on popular science, particularly the topic of extraterrestrial intelligence and the controversial Roswell incident. The cover features a striking headline in Norwegian, 'Intelligent extraterrestrial beings: DO THEY REALLY LOOK LIKE THIS?', accompanied by an artistic rendering of an alien. The magazine explores scientific and fictional ideas about alien appearances, delves into the details of the Roswell incident, and includes an analysis of alleged film footage.

Intelligent Extraterrestrial Beings: Appearance and Evolution

The article "Intelligente utenomjordiske vesener SER DE VIRKELIG SLIK UT?" (Intelligent extraterrestrial beings: DO THEY REALLY LOOK LIKE THIS?) by Nils P. Thuesen, discusses the diverse ways intelligent aliens might be imagined. It contrasts the familiar, human-like E.T. with the terrifying aliens from the film 'Alien'. The piece highlights that while many imagine aliens as somewhat human-like, especially if they inhabit Earth-like planets, this is not the only possibility. Stephen Jay Gould is quoted, emphasizing that evolutionary history is shaped by 'accidents' like asteroid impacts, suggesting that life's development can take vastly different paths. The article posits that there could be millions of planets with conditions suitable for advanced civilizations within our own Milky Way galaxy alone.

It acknowledges the influence of science fiction on public perception of aliens. The core question is how to imagine them, given the vast possibilities. The article presents two main schools of thought among researchers: 'anthropofuges' who believe no aliens will resemble humans due to unique evolutionary events on Earth, and those who believe similarities are likely due to shared fundamental elements like chemistry, DNA, and reproduction, leading to features like eyes, mouths, and limbs.

Advanced alien civilizations might have evolved far beyond human capabilities, potentially using different energy forms and traveling faster than light. The article also touches upon the philosophical and ethical considerations, such as whether such beings would have religions, morals, or have overcome warfare.

The Roswell Incident and Film Analysis

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the Roswell incident of July 2, 1947. The article "MYSTERIET" (The Mystery) discusses the alleged crash of a UFO near Roswell, New Mexico, and the subsequent recovery of four humanoid beings. It references a film that purportedly shows these beings and an autopsy. Experts are cited as believing the film is genuine and consistent with the 1947 era, based on its quality and the depicted environment. The film was reportedly shot by a former US Air Force photographer.

Page 3 features a detailed "Filmanalyse Roswell" (Film Analysis Roswell) by Bob Shell. Shell, a film expert, analyzes the physical characteristics of the film stock used for the alleged Roswell footage. He identifies the film as Cine Kodak Super XX High Speed Panchromatic Safety Film, manufactured in the early 1940s and discontinued in 1956-57. His analysis of the edge code markings and film base (acetate propionate) strongly suggests it is consistent with film manufactured, exposed, and processed around 1947. He dismisses the possibility of faking such footage with old film today due to degradation and cosmic radiation.

The Cameraman's Story

Page 4 presents "THE CAMERAMAN'S STORY" by an unnamed individual who claims to have been a cameraman involved in the Roswell incident. He states he joined the forces in March 1942 and left in 1952, and his background in photography, aided by his father's expertise, allowed him to serve in specialized roles. He recounts being assigned to Intelligence and filming tests at White Sands, including the Manhattan Project and Trinity tests. He describes receiving orders from General McMullan and Tooey for a special assignment to film a crash site south-west of Socorro, initially told it was a Russian spy plane. He was flown to Roswell and then transported to the crash site, which he describes as a large, disc-shaped 'Flying Saucer' lying on its back, radiating heat. He notes the presence of 'Freak creatures' that were injured and crying, protective of boxes they held. He details the collection of debris and the subsequent filming of autopsies, stating he filmed three autopsies, the first two in July 1947. He expresses frustration that the footage he processed was never collected by Washington and has remained with him ever since.

Additional Sightings and Video Offer

Page 2 includes brief reports of UFO sightings in Norway: one in Repvåg on a Sunday afternoon around 4 PM, where witnesses saw an oval object with fire and lights, and another in Rømskog involving a mysterious balloon that disappeared in a smoke cloud, with police suspecting no human occupants.

Pages 5 and 6 are advertisements for a video release titled 'ROSWELL' - The Original Uncut Raw Footage. It is available via mail order and is described as containing all viewable material from the reels received from the alleged Roswell cameraman. The tape is protected by Macrovision and not for broadcast quality. The advertisement provides pricing for UK and overseas orders, payment methods, and contact information for ordering.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the intersection of popular science, mystery, and the unexplained. The editorial stance appears to be one of presenting evidence and analysis, particularly concerning the Roswell incident, while acknowledging controversy and encouraging readers to draw their own conclusions. The inclusion of a cameraman's personal account and a detailed film stock analysis lends a sense of investigative journalism to the topic. The magazine also shows an interest in UFO phenomena beyond the Roswell incident, as evidenced by the inclusion of Norwegian sightings. The overall tone is informative and speculative, aiming to engage readers with intriguing subjects from the realm of the unknown.