Klipprunden - 1985 01 20

Magazine Overview

This issue of UFO-Norge, dated January 20, 1985, focuses on UFO activity and investigations in Norway, particularly in 1984. The magazine includes reports on sightings, organizational updates, and scientific analyses of alleged phenomena.

Content Summary

Editorial and Organizational News:
The issue begins with a personal note from the editor, mentioning the ongoing process of collecting mail and the increasing number of clippings. There's a mention of Hynek's upcoming visit and a call for more sponsors to support their efforts, noting that the monthly cost has decreased to 45 kroner. The editor expresses gratitude for new sponsors and welcomes Ilse Sandernes.

Hessdalen Report and Production:
A significant portion of the magazine details the production of the "Hessdalen Report Part 1." Gøran Granath from Oslo spent two evenings copying 64 pages into 300 copies, totaling approximately 19,200 pages. The process involved sorting reports and dealing with large quantities of paper. The report includes photos and will be professionally bound. The cost of printing is partially covered by a deal with OCE, providing 20,000 sheets for a low price and free use of machines. The editor humorously refers to the effort as "Help to self-annihilation" rather than "Help to self-help," acknowledging the difficulty of the venture.

The report, compiled by Erling Strand, has undergone extensive revisions. It will be sold for 60 kroner, which is presented as a good value compared to a thinner report from NIVFO priced at 145 kroner. Some individuals, including members of the Advisory Committee and professors, will receive the report for free to further their cause.

Product Updates:
There's an update on the "light pens" (kulepenner med lys), with the self-adhesive name labels expected soon, after which they will be sent to direct purchasers.

UFO-Rama and Auction:
UFO-Rama plans to purchase a fur hat for Hynek in Hessdalen, have him sign it, and offer it in the next issue's journal as an auction item, with bids accepted from now on.

Clippings and Case Reports:
The magazine includes several clippings from various Norwegian newspapers detailing UFO sightings and investigations:

• Tromsø (January 8, 1985): Reports on the "UFO-Norge" annual report for Northern Norway, stating that 1984 was a poor year for UFO sightings with only 10 observations, compared to 45 in 1983. Two cases are highlighted: one in Saltdal involving a pulsating yellow-orange object, and another in Tysfjord with a dark object and lights. UFO-Norge's Northern Norway branch has adopted computer systems for investigations.
• Sørlandet (January 9, 1985): A letter from "G.M." dismisses UFO hysteria, attributing sightings to aircraft or helicopters and suggesting focusing on more pressing issues like nuclear weapons.
• Vesterålen (January 8, 1985): A report from UFO-Norge avd. Nord-Norge reiterates the low number of sightings in 1984 and highlights the two interesting cases from Saltdal and Tysfjord.
• Fremover (January 8, 1985): A brief report on the UFO-Norge year-end overview, mentioning the use of data for investigations and highlighting the Tysfjord sighting.
• Dagbladet Sørlandet (January 3, 1985): "Seks ungdommer observerte UFO" (Six youths observed a UFO) details an observation by six young people in Slettheia on January 1st, describing a large, yellow object with black and red fields and a flame-like emission.
• Harstad Tidende (January 7, 1985): "Laber UFO-aktivitet i Nord-Norge i fjor" (Poor UFO activity in Northern Norway last year) echoes the findings of UFO-Norge's report, detailing the Saltdal and Tysfjord cases.
• Nordlands Framtid (January 7, 1985): "1984 ble et dårlig UFO-år" (1984 became a bad UFO year) summarizes the UFO-Norge report, noting the decrease in sightings and the ongoing investigation efforts.
• Glåmdalen (January 7, 1985): "UFO over Holtberget" describes a sighting by a couple of a long, luminous object near Holtberget, suggesting it might be a satellite.
• Nordlandsposten (December 29, 1984): Reports on freelance journalist Arne Wisth taking a youth club to Hessdalen to study the phenomenon.
• Firdaposten (January 5, 1985): "UFO over Svelgen?" recounts a report of a strange, cigar-shaped object seen near Florø.
• Kinnmark (January 5, 1985): "UFO i Havøysund?" describes a sighting by three boys and a teacher of a sharp light followed by a dark, spherical object.
• Dagbladet Sørlandet (January 4, 1985): "Så UFO også onsdag kveld" (Saw UFO also Wednesday evening) features Marianne Myrene's account of a flying object observed over Kristiansand, which moved, stopped, shook, and emitted a red flash.
• Dagbladet Sørlandet (undated): "Vakthavende flyleder på Kjevik: Folk kan se rart i skarp luft" (On-duty flight leader at Kjevik: People can see strange things in sharp air) quotes Rasmus Morvik, who states that clear, cold air can lead to unusual aerial observations, but notes that UFOs are rarely registered on radar.
• Dagbladet Sørlandet (undated): "Intet mystisk på militærets radar: Alt har sin forklaring" (Nothing mysterious on military radar: Everything has an explanation) quotes Major Per Stensland from Måkerøy Radar, who confirms no unusual or unexplainable activity in the airspace over Kristiansand and states that all phenomena observed within their range have had natural explanations.
• Dagbladet Sørlandet (undated): "Var det «besøk»?" (Was it a "visit"?) tells the story of Eva Aklestad and her son who observed a cone-shaped object with lights, moving silently over their farm.

Scientific and Explanatory Content:
Page 4 features a report by Jan S. Krogh for Norsk Institutt for Vitenskapelig Forskning og Opplysning (NIVFO), titled "Hessdalsrapporten." It concludes that observed light phenomena in Hessdalen can be explained by natural causes, including planets (Mars, Venus, Jupiter), weather balloons, satellites, meteors, and geological discharges. It dismisses the idea of extraterrestrial spacecraft. The report also mentions potential explanations like deception, exaggeration, imagination, and religious reasons for some sightings. It notes that airborne pollutants might also play a role.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance:
The magazine consistently reports on UFO sightings across Norway, often highlighting the efforts of UFO-Norge in documenting and investigating these events. There's a recurring theme of trying to find rational explanations for sightings, with contributions from scientific institutions like NIVFO and military radar operators emphasizing natural causes. However, the magazine also provides a platform for eyewitness accounts, suggesting that some phenomena remain unexplained or intriguing. The editorial stance appears to be one of open investigation, balancing skepticism with a willingness to report on unusual occurrences, while also promoting their own publications and research efforts.

This document appears to be an issue of a magazine or newsletter focused on UFO phenomena, specifically referencing "PROJECT HESSDALEN 1984" and a "FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT PART ONE" by siv. ing. Erling Strand. The cover story details a personal sighting by Eva Aklestad.

Witness Account: Eva Aklestad's Sighting

The main narrative recounts a UFO sighting experienced by Eva Aklestad and her son on a November evening in 1984 near Røymo, Norway. Aklestad, described as not prone to fantasy and initially skeptical, recounts the event with detailed observations. The sighting lasted approximately 12-13 minutes.

Object Description and Behavior

The object was described as approximately six meters long with a diameter of about three meters, and had a cone-like shape. It hovered silently about 50 meters above the farm. From the rear, it resembled a trailer with lights, and it emitted what Aklestad described as "light-orbs" (lys-ker) about 3-4 times, comparing them to small glass domes. The object moved silently, with "even stops" (jevne stopp), moving down towards Svisdal. It also swung and turned, which particularly frightened her son.

The TV Interference

Coinciding with the sighting, the family's television experienced severe interference. The screen became erratic, with static and crackling sounds. Aklestad initially attributed this to the northern lights and wind, common causes for poor TV reception. However, the unusual nature of the interference, which stopped when the object disappeared, led her to believe it was connected to the UFO.

Location and Progression

After hovering over Aklestad's farm, the object moved towards Grøvudalen, then descended towards Skålvoll, where it hovered again for a time. It continued its descent towards Hafsås, and Aklestad was able to see its outline from behind. Finally, it disappeared further down towards Svisdal.

Aklestad's Perspective and Beliefs

Eva Aklestad states that she cannot find any natural explanation for the episode. Her nine-year-old son was so traumatized that he is now afraid to go outside after dark. When asked about the possibility of other witnesses, she noted that she had never heard of similar observations in the area before. She believes the TV interference was directly related to the object. While initially hesitant to speculate, when pressed, she expressed a belief in life beyond Earth, stating, "I can't find any other explanation for this than that it must have been an object from another planet." Her husband, Martinus Røymo, also found no natural explanation.

The Hessdalen Connection

The issue also prominently features "PROJECT HESSDALEN 1984" and advertises a "FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT PART ONE" by siv. ing. Erling Strand. This suggests that the magazine is connected to or reporting on the ongoing investigations into the Hessdalen phenomena, a well-known area in Norway for unexplained aerial sightings.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The primary theme is a first-hand account of a UFO sighting, emphasizing the witness's credibility and the unusual nature of the event, including physical effects like TV interference. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious investigation into unexplained phenomena, as evidenced by the promotion of the Hessdalen technical report. The magazine seems to validate such experiences, presenting them as credible and worthy of attention, while acknowledging the skepticism such claims often face.