Magazine Summary

Klipp & Informasjonstjenste

Magazine Issue Klipprunden (Odd-Gunnar Roed) 1970s–1980s

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You’re on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

Summary

Overview

This issue of Klipp & Informasjonstjenste from March 1984 delves into UFO phenomena, primarily focusing on the Hessdalen case and related investigations. It includes a report on a suppressed 1975 Hessdalen sighting involving photographs and police involvement, which was later dismissed as a hoax. The publication also features witness accounts of strange lights and objects in Norway and discusses a controversial UFO report from Suffolk, UK. The editor announces the acquisition of a new copying machine and a price increase for the information service, aiming to expand its coverage across Scandinavia. Leif Havik, a key contact for UFO-Norge, expresses his exhaustion with the constant inquiries regarding Hessdalen and announces a temporary hiatus from UFO-related activities.

Magazine Overview

This issue of Klipp & Informasjonstjenste, dated March 21, 1984, is a Norwegian publication focused on UFO phenomena and related investigations. The editor, Odd Bunnar, provides updates on his information service and discusses recent UFO-related news and personal experiences.

The Hessdalen Phenomenon and a Suppressed Case

The issue prominently features the Hessdalen phenomenon. The editor recounts attending a lecture in Horten where a retired admiral shared a story about a witness who encountered a landed object of unknown origin in 1975. The witness reportedly photographed the object multiple times, even in the air, and police were called to the scene, documenting scorch marks. However, the case was allegedly suppressed and never made public.

Upon further investigation with the police chief, it was revealed that the 1975 case was considered a hoax, with the witness exhibiting signs of 'advanced madness.' This revelation was shocking to the editor, who is now attempting to verify the information through other channels and plans to obtain the photos for a 'forgery' file.

Leif Havik's Exhaustion and Hiatus

Leif Havik, a key contact for UFO-Norge, expresses his extreme fatigue and frustration with the overwhelming number of inquiries related to the Hessdalen project. He states that his phone has been ringing constantly for 14 days and announces that he is temporarily shutting down his phone and setting aside all UFO-related material. He hopes to forget the subject for at least a few months.

International UFO Reports and Investigations

The publication also touches upon UFO reports from outside Norway. An article discusses the UFO report from England, specifically the incident in Suffolk on December 27, 1980. It highlights discrepancies in dates and details, citing Ian Ridpath's report which suggests police were called on December 26th, not the 27th, and questions the existence of a witness named 'Art Wallace.' The article criticizes media for sensationalizing such events.

Public Opinion on UFOs

Page four features a section titled 'Hva mener du? Tror du på UFO'er?' (What do you think? Do you believe in UFOs?). It presents brief opinions from four individuals:

  • Jan Inge Standahl, Oksvoll: Believes UFOs are likely misinterpretations and people are easily fooled, but finds reading about them interesting.
  • Roar Larsen, Ørland: Believes there is 'something' but not necessarily spaceships, defining UFO as simply an 'unidentified flying object.' He suspects some UFO stories are deception.
  • Roar Sand, Rissa: Is skeptical, believing most UFO reports are nonsense and fabrications.
  • Morten Harøy, Oksvoll: Believes in flying objects that cannot be explained by conventional means and that UFOs exist, emphasizing the need to believe in oneself.

Other Sightings and News

  • Olav Brøste from Verma reported seeing a strange light in the sky on March 12, 1984, which formed a glittering smoke trail and moved northwest. He suggests it was likely a meteor or satellite rather than a UFO.
  • An unexplained light phenomenon was observed over Haugesund on March 10, 1984, described as resembling a comet with a long tail and aurora-like effects, lasting for about half an hour. The witness ruled out it being the moon or a plane due to its speed and lack of sound.

Operational Updates and Service Expansion

The editor announces the acquisition of a new, high-quality copying machine capable of producing excellent copies, including photos, on various paper sizes and transparencies. This investment leads to a price increase for the 'Klipp & Informasjonstjenste' service to 75 kroner per quarter, with the previous amount only covering postage. The editor aims to expand the service to cover all interesting events in Scandinavia on a weekly basis and requests readers to submit any information they believe might be of interest to others.

Support and Future Publications

There is a mention of T-shirts, car stickers, and emblems being available soon with UFO-NORGE emblems. The editor also reminds readers to send in their slips for the blue support blocks and notes that material has been sent to Heikki Virtanen, who is traveling to the Soviet Union to visit UFO lodges.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, investigations, and public perception of these phenomena. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, presenting both witness accounts and skeptical viewpoints. The editor is actively involved in gathering and disseminating information, aiming to expand the scope of the service. There is a clear emphasis on the Hessdalen phenomenon, but also a recognition of the need for critical analysis and verification of reports. The personal toll of such investigations is highlighted through Leif Havik's statement.

Jeg har ingen formeninger om UFO'er. Jeg savner fortsatt bevis for at de eksisterer, og det beviset får vi vel aldri heller! Jeg tror mer på at det var en satelitt eller en meteor, som kom inn i atmosfæren og brant opp, sier Olav Brøste.

— Olav Brøste

Key Incidents

  1. 1975Hessdalen, Norway

    A witness reported seeing a landed object of unknown origin, photographing it multiple times, including in the air. Police were involved and took photos of scorch marks. The case was allegedly suppressed.

  2. 1984-03-13Hessdalen, Norway

    An admiral, recently retired, shared a story about a witness who encountered a landed object of unknown origin and photographed it.

  3. 1984-03-13Hessdalen, Norway

    The police investigation into the 1975 Hessdalen case concluded it was a hoax, with the witness exhibiting signs of advanced madness.

  4. 1984-03-12Vestnes, Norway

    Thorleif Malin reported seeing a strange celestial body with a glittering smoke trail moving northwest.

  5. 1984-03-12Verma, Norway

    Olav Brøste reported seeing a strange light in the sky that formed a glittering smoke trail, moving northwest.

  6. 1984-03-10Haugesund, Norway

    An unexplained light phenomenon, resembling a comet with a long tail and possibly aurora-like effects, was observed for nearly half an hour.

  7. 1984-03-10Suffolk, United Kingdom

    A discussion regarding the UFO report from England, specifically the Woodbridge incident on December 26, 1980, with police records contradicting the deputy base commander's memorandum.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of the 1975 Hessdalen UFO case?

According to the police investigation mentioned in the article, the case was deemed a hoax, and the witness exhibited signs of advanced madness.

Why is Leif Havik taking a break from UFO-related activities?

Leif Havik is overwhelmed by the constant barrage of phone calls and inquiries regarding the Hessdalen project, leading him to temporarily shut down his phone and set aside UFO material.

What is the new price for the Klipp & Informasjonstjenste service?

The price has been raised to 75 kroner per quarter, with the previous 50 kroner only covering postage costs.

What is the significance of the Woodbridge incident mentioned?

The Woodbridge incident, dated December 26, 1980, is discussed in relation to a UFO report from England, with police records reportedly contradicting official statements.

In This Issue

People Mentioned

  • Odd BunnarEditor/Publisher
  • Leif HavikContact person for UFO-Norge
  • AdmiralRetired Admiral
  • Thorleif MalinWitness
  • Olav BrøsteWitness
  • Jan Inge StandahlInterviewee
  • Roar LarsenInterviewee
  • Roar SandInterviewee
  • Morten HarøyInterviewee
  • Charles I. HaltDeputy base commander
  • Ian RidpathResearcher
  • Art WallaceAlleged pseudonym
  • +1 more

Organisations

  • Horten Rotaryforening
  • FFI
  • UFO-Sverige
  • UFO-NORGE
  • NORSKE ARGUS A-S
  • BYRÅET FOR AVISUTKLIPP
  • Fosna-Folket
  • Frisprog
  • Frostingen
  • Adresseavisen
  • NIVFO
  • ROMSDAL FOLKEBLAD
  • Haugesunds Avis

Locations

  • Hessdalen, Norway
  • Horten, Norway
  • Suffolk, United Kingdom
  • Woodbridge, United Kingdom
  • Ipswich, United Kingdom
  • Vestnes, Norway
  • Verma, Norway
  • Brøstdalen, Norway
  • Romsdalen, Norway
  • Haugesund, Norway
  • Porshaug, Norway
  • Soviet Union, Russia

Topics & Themes

UFO SightingsHessdalen PhenomenonWitness TestimoniesSkepticismInvestigationUFOHessdalenNorwayWitnessPolicePhotographsAdmiralLeif HavikOdd BunnarUFO-NorgeUFO-SverigeObjectScorched marks