JUFOF - Issue 253 - 2021 01

Magazine Overview

Title: Jufof
Issue: 01-2021 (Jg. 41, Nr. 253)
Date: January 2021
Publisher: GEP e.V. (Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens)
Country: Germany
Language: German
ISSN: 0723-7766
Price: 4,50 Euro

This issue of 'Jufof', the journal for UFO research, delves into various aspects of UFO phenomena, with a primary focus on documented sightings, their analysis, and the broader context of the 'UFO Mythos'. The editorial highlights the ongoing pursuit of unknown phenomena in 2021, referencing both historical encounters and contemporary investigations, including those potentially linked to Pentagon projects. It frames the issue's content as related to the 'UFO Mythos', which has shaped public perception through film, television, and literature.

Editorial

Danny Ammon, in his editorial 'Liebe Leser' (Dear Readers), sets the tone for the issue by discussing the persistent fascination with UFOs and the 'UFO Mythos'. He acknowledges the scientific aspirations of UFO research while emphasizing the need for an open-minded approach, free from preconceived notions about the causes of unexplained cases. Ammon introduces André Kramer's contribution, which discusses the status and future of methodologically sound UFO research, building on previous discussions in the journal. The editorial also points to the documentation of numerous UFO reports that could not be further investigated, as well as an article exploring the significance of 'Magonia' in UFO research, questioning its role as a purported origin for unusual airships.

UFO-Beobachtungen: Dokumentationen – Beurteilungen

This section presents several previously unpublished UFO cases from the GEP's archive, which were reported years after the actual events. Due to the passage of time and lack of precise details, these cases were classified as 'Insufficient Data' but are published to share interesting experiences.

19800200 A: Schleswig, Germany (February 1980)

A witness, then a conscript, reported seeing a 'grießelndes Gebilde' (grainy shape) in the form of a triangle with a rounded base, approximately 20-25 meters in diameter, colored blue-white. It hovered about 50 meters above a bus stop near a barracks for over 10 minutes before accelerating away at immense speed. The witness confirmed the observation with 14 other soldiers. The discussion notes the barracks no longer exist and the location of the bus stop was approximately 200 meters from the barracks entrance.

00000000 AN: Mannheim, Germany (1978-1980)

Two witnesses, aged 14-16 at the time, reported seeing a large, cigar-shaped, dark brown, metallic object with a glossy finish. It had no visible engines or cockpit and rotated slowly on its axis while flying over them and the autobahn. They estimated its height to be 100-200 meters. The object disappeared after they crossed under an autobahn underpass. The witness later compared the object's appearance to an e-cigarette.

00000000 X: Bremerhaven, Germany (1984/85)

A witness reported seeing a multi-colored light strip, estimated to be 50-100 meters long, hovering silently at a height of 50-150 meters near an old, disused gas station. The observation occurred late at night during windy and cloudy conditions. The witness could not discern the object's shape due to the darkness and clouds but was certain it was not a conventional aircraft and that there were no cranes or similar structures in the vicinity that could explain it. The sighting lasted approximately 25 minutes.

20140511 A: Ostia Antica, Italy (May 11, 2014)

A witness on a scientific trip to the ancient city of Ostia Antica discovered an unusual flying object in a photograph taken in 2014. The object, which was not noticed at the time of photography, appeared in a photo taken at 09:14 MESZ. The discussion and assessment suggest the object is likely a drone or quadrocopter, commonly used for aerial photography of archaeological sites. The witness had reviewed older photos in 2018 and noticed the anomaly.

Magonia: Der Herkunftsort der UFOs?

This article by Ulrich Magin explores the concept of 'Magonia' as a purported origin for UFOs, as discussed in 'folkloristic UFO research'. Magin investigates whether Magonia has been wrongly presented as a widespread origin for unusual airships and their occupants, based on extensive source research.

Der UFO-Mythos: Zu Paradigmenwechsel und ETH-Kritik

This section, featuring a contribution by André Kramer, likely delves into the 'UFO Mythos' and its relationship to paradigm shifts and critiques of Extra-Terrestrial Hypothesis (ETH) in UFO research. It aims to continue the discussion on the status and future of methodologically sound UFO research.

Literatur

This section includes reviews of current book titles related to UFO research. One entry, 'Auf Abfangkurs' (On Intercept Course), is listed.

Impressum

The 'Impressum' section details the publisher, Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens (GEP) e.V., founded in 1972, with contact information and bank details. It also lists the editors responsible for the content as Hans-Werner Peiniger and Danny Ammon. The journal is published bi-monthly on a non-commercial basis, with contributions being honorarium-free. Information for authors is available on the GEP website. Subscription prices and advertising rates are also provided.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the meticulous documentation and analysis of UFO sightings, the distinction between the 'UFO Mythos' and empirical research, and the historical context of UFO phenomena. The editorial stance, as articulated by Danny Ammon, emphasizes a commitment to scientific rigor, open-mindedness, and a critical examination of evidence, while acknowledging the enduring fascination and complexity of the UFO subject. The journal aims to foster methodologically sound research and present a diverse range of cases and perspectives within the field.

This issue of the "JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG" (Journal for UFO Research), dated 1-2021, issue Nr. 253, features several detailed investigations into reported UFO and UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) sightings, primarily from Germany and Switzerland. The publication includes photographic analysis, witness testimonies, and discussions of potential explanations, ranging from mundane objects to historical interpretations of aerial phenomena.

Case 1: Rüeggisberg, Switzerland (20150802 C)

This case, reported on August 2, 2015, involves a photograph taken by Richard B. (42) near Rüeggisberg, Switzerland, showing the Gantrisch mountain. Upon closer inspection, an elongated object was discovered in the photo, near the mountain massif. The investigator, Hans-Werner Peiniger, notes that the witness did not observe any airborne object or hear any sound at the time of the sighting. A subsequent photo taken moments later showed no object. Potential explanations discussed include a basejumper, a wingsuiter, a drone, a bird (specifically a bird of prey), and an insect. The investigator leans towards the insect explanation, noting that while a bird might have been visible, its appearance in the photo doesn't quite match the observed characteristics. The object's appearance as a blurred streak is attributed to the camera's high shutter speed (1/256 sec.) and the object's movement. The vertical blur is considered unusual but not impossible, especially if the movement was diagonal downwards. The investigator concludes that while the object might be interpreted as an insect, the photo's impression of distance is somewhat misleading.

Case 2: Schönebeck, Germany (20090000 E)

Reported in November 2019, this case dates back to October/November 2009, when Toni K. (18) was riding his bicycle near Schönebeck, Germany. He reported seeing a large, bright, white light sphere hovering silently at an estimated altitude of 50 meters. The object was described as having the intensity of a spotlight and remained motionless for a period before ascending vertically at high speed. The witness was unable to identify the object and was hesitant to speak about it for a long time. Due to the time elapsed, the investigation was classified as having "insufficient data."

Case 3: Winterberg, Germany (20060710 A)

This case from July 10, 2006, involves Klaus S. and his partner photographing the moon near Winterberg, Germany. They observed a bright light source moving in a wide arc. A bright spot in one of their photographs was initially thought to be a photographic artifact but was later described by the photographer as a "physical object of unknown origin." The investigation was initially not pursued due to a lack of perceived anomalous characteristics, with possible explanations including an aircraft's landing light or a sky lantern. However, a closer examination of the photo suggested it might be a small insect that flew through the frame during the exposure, illuminated by the camera's flash. The investigator notes that the flash was accidentally activated.

Case 4: Merseburg, Germany (20140218 C)

Reported by Sybille B. (39) on February 18, 2014, this case involves photographs taken during a full moon. The witness described an "invisible, probably elongated object" ascending vertically and slightly diagonally from below the moon. The photographs show a faint trail near the moon. The investigation considered various explanations, including a condensation trail from an aircraft, which is deemed the most probable explanation. The trail's appearance is attributed to the moon's brightness overexposing the condensation trail, creating a perceived division. Other possibilities like a model rocket or a deliberate hoax were also mentioned but dismissed. The witness initially provided an incorrect time for the sighting, which was later corrected based on astronomical data and EXIF information from the photos.

Magonia: The Origin of UFOs?

This section, authored by Ulrich Magin, delves into historical accounts of aerial phenomena, specifically referencing the concept of "Magonia." This mythical land, mentioned in medieval texts, is proposed by author Jacques Vallée as a possible origin for phenomena now identified as UFOs. The article traces the origin of the Magonia legend to Bishop Agobard of Lyon (c. 769–840 AD), who wrote about various beliefs and superstitions of his time. Agobard, described as a learned and rational bishop, addressed phenomena like hail and thunder, attributing them to natural causes rather than demonic influence. He also rejected beliefs in witchcraft and sorcery. The article discusses Agobard's treatise "On Hail and Thunder," where Magonia is mentioned, and his rational approach to understanding natural events. The author highlights Agobard's opposition to superstitious beliefs and his efforts to promote a rational understanding of the world.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout this issue is the rigorous investigation and analysis of reported anomalous aerial phenomena. The journal consistently seeks to identify the cause of sightings, often favoring conventional explanations such as aircraft, natural phenomena, or misidentified objects over exotic or extraterrestrial hypotheses. The editorial stance emphasizes a scientific and evidence-based approach, meticulously examining photographic evidence, witness accounts, and historical context. The journal aims to document cases, provide thorough explanations, and contribute to a rational understanding of UFO phenomena, while also exploring historical and cultural perspectives on aerial sightings.

This issue of the "JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG" (Journal for UFO Research), issue 1-2021, number 253, delves into the complex topic of the "UFO Myth." It explores the historical roots of UFO beliefs, the challenges in researching the phenomenon, and the role of psychology and language in shaping our understanding.

The Magonia Legend and its Origins

The article begins by examining the historical context of beliefs surrounding Magonia, a supposed land from which "cloud ships" would descend to steal harvests, particularly in the context of medieval France. Archbishop Agobard of Lyon is cited as a primary source, recounting an incident from around 810 AD where individuals were accused of being pilots of these cloud ships and were nearly stoned. Agobard viewed these beliefs as superstitious and a sign of the era's "madness."

The text clarifies that many popular accounts of Magonia, particularly those found in later UFO literature by authors like Jacques Vallée and Johannes Fiebag, are not based on original historical sources but rather on a fictional occult novel, "Comte de Gabalis" (1670), by Abbot Nicolas-Pierre-Henri de Montfaucon de Villars. This novel greatly expanded upon the brief mentions by Agobard, weaving a fantastical narrative.

Further historical context is provided by the philologist W. Mannhardt, who in 1859 explored potential Celtic or Germanic origins for the name "Magonia," linking it to solar deities. However, more recent theories, like that of Jean-Louis Brodu, suggest a connection to the ancient name of Menorca's capital, Mago, from which storms were believed to originate, thus linking "Magonian ships" to the destructive forces of nature.

The UFO Phenomenon: A Myth or Reality?

The article then transitions to a discussion of the broader UFO phenomenon and the challenges in researching it. It critiques the tendency in popular UFO literature to selectively present data that supports the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH), while ignoring contradictory or absurd elements. This selective approach, it is argued, leads to an inconsistent and potentially misleading picture.

André Kramer's article, "Der UFO-Mythos," engages with contributions from Danny Ammon and Dieter Sträuli, questioning whether a paradigm shift towards purely subjective UFO research is necessary and if the ETH is inherently flawed due to the phenomenon's inconsistencies.

Kramer highlights that the term "UFO" itself is a broad catch-all term for unexplained aerial phenomena. He discusses how the mythos surrounding UFOs has been constructed over decades, often through sensationalized accounts of crashed spaceships, government cover-ups, and alien abductions.

Psychoanalysis and the Construction of UFO Beliefs

The role of psychoanalysis in understanding UFO phenomena is explored, referencing the work of Carl Gustav Jung, who interpreted UFO sightings as symbols of the subconscious. Dieter Sträuli's perspective is discussed, which views the UFO as a cultural phenomenon of its time, shaped by the interplay of subject, object, and language. Sträuli's approach, while valuable for analyzing the cultural construction of the UFO myth, is critiqued for treating all UFO reports equally, regardless of their quality or verifiability, potentially overlooking objective reality.

Kramer argues that by treating UFOs as a defined object rather than a class of unexplained phenomena, researchers can fall into similar traps as those found in popular UFO literature. He emphasizes the need for a more rigorous, less pre-conceived approach to research.

Ball Lightning as a Comparative Case

A significant portion of the discussion is dedicated to ball lightning, presented as a phenomenon that shares characteristics with UFO sightings. Ball lightning is described as unpredictable, often appearing during thunderstorms, and its nature remains largely unexplained, with various theories and anecdotal reports existing. The article draws parallels between the research challenges of ball lightning and UFOs, noting that both phenomena are often relegated to "other realities" due to their unusual nature and lack of clear conventional explanations.

The article suggests that phenomena like ball lightning, which are difficult to categorize and explain, could be considered part of the broader UFO spectrum if viewed through a lens that acknowledges the limitations of current scientific understanding and the subjective nature of observation.

Conclusion and Future Directions

The issue concludes by reiterating that the UFO phenomenon, as a collective term, encompasses a wide range of unexplained events. It suggests that the focus should shift from finding a single explanation for "the UFO phenomenon" to investigating various unexplained aerial phenomena through comparative methods. While the ETH remains a possibility, it is not definitively proven, and other explanations, including psychological and cultural factors, must be considered. The article advocates for a critical UFO research that proceeds without preconceived notions, acknowledging the potential for both objective reality and subjective interpretation.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the historical evolution of UFO beliefs, the critical analysis of research methodologies, and the influence of psychological and cultural factors on the perception of unexplained phenomena. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, advocating for rigorous, evidence-based research that avoids sensationalism and acknowledges the complexities and ambiguities inherent in the study of UFOs. There is a clear emphasis on distinguishing between historical accounts, fictional embellishments, and scientific investigation, while also being open to the possibility of genuinely unexplained events.

This issue of the "JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG" (Journal for UFO Research), issue number 253, dated 1-2021, published by GEP (Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens) in Germany, focuses on historical and contemporary UFO research. The cover prominently features a compilation of works on "Luftschiffe und Aeronauten" (Airships and Aeronauts) from 1896 to 1915, edited by Ulrich Magin.

Editorial and Main Articles

The editorial section, likely written by a GEP representative, emphasizes the need for an open-minded and phenomenological approach to UFO research. The author stresses that while 100% certainty is rare and subjective expectations play a role, it is premature to dismiss the possibility of unidentified phenomena. The author advocates for comparative methods, similar to the ongoing research into ball lightning, which has made more progress in replication and testing than classical UFO research. The article concludes that while many things are possible, nothing is certain in UFO research.

Book Review: "Auf Abfangkurs - Die UFO-Task-Force des Pentagon"

This section reviews the book "Auf Abfangkurs" by Grazyna Fosar and Franz Bludorf. The reviewers describe the authors as known figures in fringe science literature, active in the "Matrix 3000" magazine. While acknowledging their ability to present complex topics understandably and to stimulate reader thought, the reviewer notes a tendency towards pseudo-scientific, conspiracy-theory, and esoteric content, often masked by a scientific veneer. The book reportedly covers the Nimitz incident and official Pentagon UFO videos, detailing the AATIP project (funded by $22 million) and its objectives, which included investigating potential alien technology and propulsion systems. The review highlights that the book summarizes information about AATIP, including its theoretical underpinnings for interstellar travel and the possibility of warp drives. Despite the lack of sensational revelations, the reviewer found the compilation of information and summary of the AATIP project to be valuable for those wishing to avoid extensive research.

Book Review: "Luftschiffe und Aeronauten (1896-1915)"

This section reviews the edited volume "Luftschiffe und Aeronauten" by Ulrich Magin. The book provides a historical look at airship sightings and observations from 1896 to 1915, particularly on the American West Coast. The review notes that these sightings, involving steerable balloons, sparked speculation about human inventors and even extraterrestrial spacecraft. The editor, Ulrich Magin, is presented as a UFO researcher who believes these historical observations are connected to the modern UFO phenomenon. The table of contents includes contributions from Jerome Clark on airships, Loren E. Gross on UFOs from 1896, Nigel Watson on "Zeppelins of Fear," and Ulrich Magin on "Airships - A 'modern' saga," along with an appendix on airship sightings in Germany in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The book is described as a historical examination of the airship phenomenon, with a significant portion of UFO researchers believing it relates to modern UFOs. The publication is available from GEP and Michaels Verlag.

GEP and UFO Information

The journal also provides information about the GEP, describing it as Germany's largest non-profit scientific organization dedicated to UFO research. The GEP conducts interdisciplinary investigations using questionnaires, interviews, and background analysis, supported by various authorities and institutions. The "jufof" journal, in publication since 1980, is presented as a critical and factual publication that documents UFO reports, classifications, and case studies, alongside scientific articles and international analyses. It also includes a section for reviews and reader letters.

Defining a UFO

The journal offers a definition of a UFO: an object or light perceived in the sky or on land whose appearance, trajectory, and behavior defy conventional explanation and remain unidentifiable after thorough technical examination. The definition emphasizes that such identifications are made by technically capable individuals.

Reporting UFO Sightings

Information is provided on how to report UFO sightings. Interested individuals can contact a 24/7 hotline, send an email to [email protected], or visit the GEP's websites (www.ufo-forschung.de and www.jufof.de), which also offer a web forum and chat.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the historical context of UFO sightings (airships), contemporary UFO investigations (Pentagon's UFO Task Force), and the methodology of UFO research. The editorial stance, as expressed in the main article, advocates for a rigorous, open-minded, and phenomenological approach, acknowledging the uncertainties inherent in the field while remaining open to the existence of unidentified phenomena. The GEP's role as a scientific, interdisciplinary research body is also a prominent theme.