JUFOF - Issue 224 - 2016 02

Magazine Overview

Title: jufof
Issue: 02-2016, Jg. 37, Nr. 224
Date: February 2016
Publisher: GEP e.V.
Price: 4,50 Euro
ISSN: 0723-7766

This issue of 'jufof,' the journal for UFO research published by GEP e.V., focuses on the phenomenon of 'Strangeness' in UFO sightings, exploring the classification and investigation of unusual characteristics. The cover features a striking image of a red and yellow object hovering over a field.

Editorial

The editorial, written by Hans-Werner Peiniger, addresses reader requests for more transparency regarding the work of the GEP board. It announces the dissolution of the internal GEP-Aktiven email list and the migration of discussions to the GEP-Mitglieder email list. Upcoming topics for discussion include the next members' meeting, workshop design, the 'PROBLEMATIC UFO' project, refining the Hendry classification, and developing a club mission statement. The editorial also highlights the continuation of a discussion initiated by André Kramer regarding UFO classifications, with Danny Ammon contributing insights into previous international efforts on the topic. Readers are encouraged to participate in these discussions.

UFO Observations: Documentations – Appraisals

This section presents several case studies of UFO sightings, with detailed analyses and conclusions:

UFO over Gebenstorf, Switzerland, turns out to be a publicity stunt

• Date: October 8, 2015
• Location: Gebenstorf, Switzerland
• Witness: Andreas R.
• Classification: CE I
• Appraisal: IFO / V1
• Identification: Balloon-Object

A witness observed a larger object hovering silently over a tree line. Initial photos were of poor quality. Further investigation revealed that the object was a promotional stunt by the 'Häxeschränzer Gäbistorf' group to advertise their carnival ball. The stunt involved large helium-filled balloons and was documented on video and reported in local media, including a TV report by Tele M1 which initially ruled out aircraft but suggested a sky lantern, while the GEP investigation identified it as a promotional balloon construction.

"Phenomenon" photographed during a flight to Tunisia

• Date: April 1978
• Location: Over the Mediterranean Sea
• Witness: Norbert W.
• Classification: DD
• Appraisal: IFO / V1
• Identification: Condensation drops on aircraft window

A passenger on a flight to Tunisia took photos from the aircraft. Upon developing the photos, an object was discovered that the witness described as a "phenomenon." The investigation concluded that the object was condensation drops on the aircraft's window, with a dark smudge on the scanned image not present in the original.

"Strange Objects" discovered in a photo

• Date: July 5, 2007
• Location: Pforzheim – Haidach, Germany
• Witness: Evelyn U.
• Classification: DD

A couple submitted a photograph taken from their vehicle, which revealed two "strange objects" upon closer inspection. The investigation determined these objects to be insects or birds in flight, appearing as blurred "streaks" due to their speed during the exposure. The case was considered resolved.

From the Archive

This section revisits older cases or documents:

Horse UFO photographed with

• Date: July 8, 2006
• Location: Schashagen – Merkendorf, Germany
• Witness: Nicole K.
• Classification: DD
• Appraisal: IFO / V2
• Identification: Insect (possibly bird)

A photograph taken of horses inadvertently captured an object in the background. The witness stated they were not expecting to photograph a UFO but noticed something unusual upon reviewing the images. The investigation concluded that the object was likely an insect or bird in flight, appearing as a blur due to its movement. The witness accepted this explanation.

Unusual object discovered in a landscape portrait

• Date: August 16, 2007
• Location: Tamsweg, Austria
• Witness: Michael K.
• Classification: IFO / V2
• Appraisal: IFO / V2
• Identification: Insect (possibly bird)

While photographing a church near a holy spring, a witness captured an object in the landscape. The witness did not notice the object at the time of photography. Upon reviewing the photos later, the object was discovered. The investigation identified it as an insect or bird in flight, with the blurred appearance attributed to wing motion. The case was considered resolved.

Saarbrücken 1826

This article presents a historical UFO case from April 1826, near Saarbrücken, Germany, described as a "strange meteoric phenomenon." The report is attributed to E. F. F. Chladni and was shared by Herr Steininger, a teacher of physics and mathematics.

The Riddle of "Strangeness"

This article, starting on page 52, delves into the classification and investigation of unusual characteristics observed in UFO sightings, expanding on the cover's theme.

Literature

This section lists books related to UFOs, including "UFOs - The Final Countdown" and "Lichtphänomene" (Light Phenomena).

Short Notes

• MUFON-CES-Tagung 2015 mit GEP-Vertretern: A brief mention of GEP representatives attending the MUFON-CES conference.
• Albert Bender gestorben: Announcement of the death of Albert Bender.
• "UFO-Detektor-Software" für Webcam: A note about UFO detection software for webcams.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the rigorous investigation and classification of UFO sightings, often leading to mundane explanations. The GEP e.V. maintains a stance of scientific inquiry, seeking to demystify UFO phenomena through detailed analysis and historical research. The editorial emphasizes transparency and member participation within the organization. There's a clear effort to differentiate between genuine unexplained phenomena and misidentifications or hoaxes, as seen in the Gebenstorf case. The journal also promotes discussion and the sharing of knowledge within the UFO research community.

This issue of JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG (2-2016, NR. 224) presents a mix of case analyses, historical investigations, and technological developments in the field of UFO research. The magazine features detailed reports and discussions on various sightings and related topics.

Case Analyses

Hamburg Sighting (2007)

The issue details a case from Hamburg, Germany, involving a photograph of a strange light phenomenon. The witness, Michael K., initially noticed the anomaly upon reviewing photos taken with a Canon Powershot camera. He describes the object as having structures, including a central circle and 'struts,' and expresses skepticism towards UFO esotericism, requesting a serious analysis of the photo. The investigation, led by Hans-Werner Peiniger, classified the case as IFO (Identified Flying Object) / V1, identifying the phenomenon as a reflection, possibly from an insect, dust, or water droplet. The object was not visible at the time of photography and disappeared in subsequent shots. The case is considered resolved.

Rhön Sighting (2008)

Another case analyzed is from Geisa, Rhön, Germany, where witness Horst B. captured two photos of a 'flying object.' Hans-Werner Peiniger investigated this case, which was classified as IFO / V2, identifying the objects as likely insects or possibly birds. The EXIF data from the Canon PowerShot S50 camera indicated that the camera's flash had fired, causing a pre-flash to prevent red-eye effects. The investigation concluded that the round object was a small particle (insect, water droplet, or dust) in the camera's near-field, which was out of focus and appeared blurred into a circular shape. Similar structures were noted in other photos, reinforcing the identification. This case is also considered resolved.

Saarbrücken 1826: A Classic Case

Ulrich Magin contributes an article on the Saarbrücken 1826 event, described as a significant, albeit largely unknown in Germany, UFO incident. The phenomenon was reported on April 1, 1826, near Saarbrücken. Charles Fort documented it as a 'grayish object' about three and a half feet long, rapidly approaching and expanding like a sheet, accompanied by thunder-like sounds. The report is traced back to sources like the American Journal of Science and the Quarterly Journal of the Royale Institute. The article highlights that the most important scientific source is an essay by physicist Ernst Florens Friedrich Chladni, who is known for proving that meteorites originate from outer space. Chladni reported the event based on information from Herr Steininger, a teacher in Trier, who received it from Herr Landrath Dern in Saarbrücken. The account describes a strange object seen by Johannes Becker, a witness, which made a loud crashing and rolling sound, appearing like a 'wonderful thing' that rolled and flew like a roller before expanding like a sheet. The event was accompanied by a strong wind and a sulfurous smell reported by one witness. Chladni considered the phenomenon to be either a whirlwind or a 'gelatinous meteor' (a type of meteor not recognized by modern science). Other scholars suggested it might have been an aurora, noting similar atmospheric phenomena reported in the Saarbrücken area on the same date, involving a rolling sound and a gray object in the air. The article notes that while the event is a 'true classic' in international UFO literature, it remains practically unknown in its country of origin.

Conference and Technology Reports

MUFON-CES Conference 2015

The magazine reports on the MUFON-CES conference held in Großheirath from November 13-15, 2015, which also included representatives from GEP. Gerhard Gröschel presented on current developments in instrumental UFO research, including his automatic camera station that captured unexplained light objects. He also discussed the challenges of developing affordable, high-resolution, and sensitive night-vision cameras for UFO surveillance systems, noting that mobile systems can cost around €3,000.

Wolfgang Stelzig, MUFON-CES Chairman, presented a new automatic UFO registration station based on the Raspberry Pi computer. The goal is to create a low-cost system for all-sky monitoring, video recording of flying objects, and data registration. The basic model covers a portion of the sky, with modular expansion possible.

UFO Detection Systems

Alexander Bärnthaler showcased an advanced surveillance system also based on Raspberry Pi, which is now available. This system aims to provide a cost-effective solution for witnesses, allowing remote monitoring and data control by UFO investigators. For simpler optical surveillance, the Brinno TLC200Pro camcorder is mentioned as a viable option for around €200.

Danny Ammon, GEP Vice Chairman, gave a presentation on anomalistics and UFO research, discussing relevant topics and publications. He also touched upon the Interdimensional Hypothesis (IDH), an alternative to the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (ETH), which suggests that UFOs might be vehicles for travel between dimensions. Dr. Ingeborg K. presented on life in a multidimensional world.

UFO Detector Software

The issue discusses software that turns a USB webcam into a 'UFO detector.' This software, initially available in 2015 and later released as UFOID with open-source code, automatically detects changes in the camera's field of view and records video. The algorithm is trained to ignore common objects like planes and birds. The article questions the software's ability to reliably detect truly unknown objects given the limitations of webcams and the prevalence of conventional stimuli, but acknowledges that it could create new work for UFO researchers in analyzing the resulting footage.

CE-5 Training and Polish UFO Activities

A presentation by Dr. Steven Greer's CE-5 training is mentioned, where participants attempt to contact extraterrestrial intelligence. The presenter shared her experiences from a training session in Florida, describing two bright lights seen over the sea. The article speculates on the possibility of pyrotechnic flares being used to simulate such sightings, given the cost of the training. Rafal Nowicki, a Polish UFO researcher, reported on UFO activities in Poland, including a case where a witness observed a UFO that was also monitored by a secret military unit. Some attendees suggested this might have involved drone testing.

Other Mentions

Albert K. Bender

The death of Albert K. Bender, the man who popularized the concept of 'Men in Black,' is noted. Bender, who founded the International Flying Saucer Bureau (IFSB) in 1952, reportedly received visits from 'Men in Black' who urged him to cease his UFO investigations, leading to the dissolution of the IFSB. His books, 'They Know Too Much About Flying Saucers' and 'Flying Saucers and the Three Men,' are mentioned.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The journal consistently adopts a skeptical yet open-minded approach to UFO phenomena, emphasizing rigorous investigation and scientific analysis. Cases are often resolved by identifying natural explanations, camera artifacts, or misidentifications. The editorial stance appears to favor empirical evidence and instrumental research, as seen in the coverage of surveillance technology and conference proceedings. There is a clear distinction made between 'UFO esotericism' and serious research. The publication also highlights historical cases and their documentation, contributing to the broader understanding of the UFO phenomenon's history and evolution.

This issue of "JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG" (Journal for UFO Research), dated 2-2016 (Issue No. 224), published by GEP, focuses on the complex topic of 'Strangeness' in UFO research. The cover features a historical snippet from "Zeitung für die Elegante Welt" from January 1833, discussing a phenomenon associated with the Northern Lights and a strange noise.

The Riddle of 'Strangeness': Classification and Investigation of Unusual Characteristics of UFO Sightings

The main article, authored by Danny Ammon, delves into the concept of "Strangeness" as a key factor in UFO research. It builds upon previous discussions within the journal regarding the need for improved methodologies in classifying and evaluating UFO reports. The article highlights that the core reason for investigating unidentified flying objects (UFOs) is their anomalous, unexpected properties, which prevent conventional identification and lead to their classification as UFOs.

Defining Strangeness

The concept of "Strangeness" was notably introduced by J. Allen Hynek, who described UFOs as a "global phenomenon... so strange and foreign to our daily terrestrial mode of thought that it is frequently met by ridicule and derision by persons and organizations unacquainted with the facts." The article explains that when a witness reports a UFO sighting, they have already made a preliminary assessment of its unusual characteristics, deeming it unidentifiable and thus a UFO.

However, the journal acknowledges that in over 90% of cases, witness assessments are incorrect, and the object is eventually identified as conventional. The article distinguishes between genuine strangeness and "apparent strangeness" (Schein-Strangeness), which arises from misinterpretation due to poor observation conditions or lack of knowledge.

Methodologies for Classification and Quantification

The article extensively reviews various attempts to define, classify, and quantify UFO strangeness. It discusses the work of J. Allen Hynek, who proposed assigning numerical values (1-10) for both Strangeness and Probability. However, Hynek's criteria were largely subjective.

• Subsequent researchers have proposed refinements:
• Don Berliner (1987) offered more concrete criteria for assigning strangeness values from 1 to 10, ranging from identified objects to complex phenomena like CE III encounters with occupants.
• Isaac Koi noted that some modern interpretations, like those found on YouTube, can receive high strangeness ratings, potentially skewing the significance of cases.
• Jim Speiser (founder of "ParaNet") developed a 5-point scale (S1-S5) for "Strangeness Factor," focusing on the degree of explainability, from fully explained to highly unusual and indicative of intelligent control.
• Dr. Claude Poher, former head of the French UFO organization GEPAN, also proposed credibility and strangeness criteria, including a 0-5 scale for "Possible Explanations" (P) based on how much modification of data would be needed for a natural explanation.
• David A. Saunders and Jenny Randles are mentioned for their contributions. Saunders developed a matrix for the Condon Report, correlating various observational factors with "increasing objectivity" and "increasing strangeness." Randles, a prominent British UFO researcher, has emphasized the importance of a "title page" for case files, summarizing key information and recommending the use of strangeness and probability ratings, while also acknowledging their subjectivity.

BUFORA and Vallée's Approaches

The article also touches upon the classification system used by the British UFO organization BUFORA, which employed a 3-criteria system for case priority: number of qualified observers, number of independent observers, and observation class. The observation class itself was based on the presence of anomalous characteristics, with points awarded for physical traces, temporary physical effects, close observations of unusual objects, and distant sightings.

Jacques Vallée's SVP (Skeptical, Valid, Probable) classification is presented as a reliability index where 'P' stands for Probability, indicating the likelihood of a natural explanation. Vallée's system focuses on the effort required to find a natural explanation rather than directly measuring anomalous features.

Further Systems and Challenges

Other systems mentioned include Mark Moravec's five-factor system and a system from the Spanish book "Los OVNIS y la Ciencia" by Ballester Olmos and Miguel Guasp, which includes a "Strangeness Index" with points for anomalous appearance, movement, and other factors.

The discussion highlights the inherent difficulty in objectively defining and categorizing "anomalous characteristics." The article points out the risk of "researcher bias" (Forscher-Bias) when hypotheses influence the interpretation of anomalous features. The problem of UFOs being defined as a residual category (a "negative definition") is also discussed, meaning a case is labeled a UFO simply because it cannot be explained by conventional means.

The Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (ETH) and Future Directions

The article questions the assumption that Earth is visited by extraterrestrials, noting that attempts to formulate a scientific hypothesis for the ETH have been hampered by a lack of consistent data regarding the appearance, behavior, and origin of alleged alien beings. Researchers like Vallée and Johannes Fiebag have sought alternative explanations for UFO phenomena, but the falsifiability of these alternatives is also a concern.

The author concludes that replacing "Strangeness" with the term "anomaly" and providing a more precise definition and categorization of anomalous features is a crucial step towards a more transparent and intersubjectively comprehensible case evaluation. This process is seen as essential for advancing the understanding of the UFO phenomenon.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout this issue is the critical examination and methodological refinement of UFO research. The journal advocates for a more rigorous, objective, and transparent approach to analyzing UFO reports. There is a clear emphasis on moving beyond anecdotal evidence and subjective interpretations towards quantifiable data and verifiable classifications. The editorial stance appears to be one of scientific inquiry, seeking to understand anomalous phenomena through systematic investigation and the development of robust analytical tools, while acknowledging the inherent challenges and potential biases in the field.

This issue of the "JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG" (Journal for UFO Research), Ausgabe 2-2016, Volume NR. 224, published by GEP e.V. in Germany, focuses on literature reviews related to UFO research and related fringe topics. The issue, dated February 2016, features reviews of several books, including "UFOs - The Final Countdown" by Roland M. Horn, "Lichtphänomene" by Claudia and Wolfgang Hinz, "Vorsicht Verschwörung!" by André Kramer, and "GOOD UFO" by Sebastian Hartmann.

Literature Reviews

UFOs - The Final Countdown by Roland M. Horn

This review discusses Roland M. Horn's book, which delves into the theories of American UFO researcher Jacques Vallée. Horn's book examines Vallée's work from the 1980s and 1990s, which was previously published in Germany as a trilogy but is now out of print. The review highlights Vallée's three main hypotheses for explaining UFO phenomena: a conscious deception by humanity, an occult phenomenon, or a control mechanism manipulating reality. Similarities are noted with John A. Keel's "Superspectrum Theory," particularly the idea that the phenomenon communicates with human consciousness. The reviewer expresses skepticism about Vallée's deep engagement with contactees and cultic phenomena, suggesting it might be an over-interpretation. Horn also addresses animal mutilations, finding a connection to UFO sightings but concluding that the phenomenon remains largely unexplained. The review touches upon Vallée's concept of "Vertuschung" (cover-up) and the Roswell incident, where Horn suggests the military presented weather balloon debris to conceal the secret MOGUL project. Nick Redfern's research is mentioned, proposing a more disturbing explanation. Horn then shifts to other topics like Phoenix lights, McMinnville photos, Betty and Barney Hill, Nazi flying saucers, UFOs in the Bible, and time travel, illustrating the multifaceted nature of the UFO phenomenon. Vallée's theory that the UFO phenomenon is Earth-based, a physical manifestation of a consciousness form alien to humans, is presented as an alternative to extraterrestrial hypotheses. The reviewer, Hans-Werner Peiniger, finds this explanation to be a sign of a lack of willingness to explore more mundane explanations. He concludes that Horn's book offers an interesting and factual summary of Vallée's theses, presenting a perspective less commonly seen in the German UFO scene, and emphasizing that the UFO phenomenon is complex.

Lichtphänomene (Light Phenomena) by Claudia and Wolfgang Hinz

This review covers the book "Lichtphänomene: Farbspiele am Himmel" (Light Phenomena: Color Play in the Sky) by Claudia and Wolfgang Hinz. The book aims to provide an overview of atmospheric phenomena that can be mistaken for UFO sightings. The authors, who have years of experience in meteorology and astronomy and founded the "Arbeitskreis Meteore e.V.", specialize in colorful atmospheric and meteor phenomena. The review emphasizes the importance for UFO investigators to understand these natural occurrences. The book explains phenomena such as halos, sun dogs, rainbows, glories, mirages, iridescent clouds, and noctilucent clouds, often accompanied by impressive photographs and illustrations. The authors explain how these phenomena occur and the underlying physical processes in an easily understandable way. The reviewer, Hans-Werner Peiniger, notes that some phenomena, like "shadows of contrails," have appeared in his own UFO investigation work. He highlights the book's value in providing background knowledge that helps observers identify and understand these natural displays. The book is recommended for both interested laypeople and those seeking to deepen their understanding of atmospheric phenomena and potentially sharpen their observational skills.

Vorsicht Verschwörung! (Beware of Conspiracy!) by André Kramer

This book review introduces André Kramer's work, which addresses and debunks right-wing extremist conspiracy theories, particularly those related to UFOs, Atlantis, and Paleo-SETI. The book examines questions such as whether UFOs and abductions are linked to Nazi "breeding programs," if ancient gods were "Aryan astronauts," the reality of "Reichsflugscheiben" (Nazi flying saucers), and the continuation of World War II in the context of conspiracy theories. It also explores the success of such theories and their origins. The book is described as a current presentation and refutation of these theories within the context of right-wing extremist infiltration of fringe science topics.

GOOD UFO by Sebastian Hartmann

This review highlights Sebastian Hartmann's book, "GOOD UFO: Observations of Interesting Unidentifiable Flying Objects." Hartmann, a GEP member and media design student, created this book as his Bachelor's thesis. It presents interesting UFO cases through witness reports, sketches, images, infographics, and evaluations from UFO research groups. The material is sourced from the GEP archive and through direct communication with the organization. The book is a limited edition offset print with extensive design work, offering a comprehensive look at UFO cases.

GEP and Jufof Information

The issue also includes information about the GEP (Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens), described as the largest non-profit scientific UFO research organization in Germany. It details the GEP's methods, including questionnaires, on-site interviews, and background research, and mentions their interdisciplinary approach supported by various authorities and institutions. The "jufof" (Journal für UFO-Forschung) is presented as a publication that has critically covered the UFO phenomenon since 1980. Each issue includes documentation of sightings, their classification, and case investigations, along with scientifically written expert reports and international analyses. A review and reader letter section also features in the journal. Contact information for reporting UFO sightings to the GEP is provided, including phone, email, and website details.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around critical analysis of UFO phenomena, differentiating between genuine sightings and misidentifications of natural or man-made objects, and debunking conspiracy theories, particularly those with extremist ties. The editorial stance appears to be one of rigorous, scientific investigation, emphasizing the need for thorough research and a critical approach to claims within the UFO field. There is a clear emphasis on understanding atmospheric phenomena as a potential source of misidentification and on dissecting the psychological and societal aspects of belief in conspiracy theories. The journal promotes a methodical and interdisciplinary approach to UFO research.