JUFOF - Issue 197 - 2011 05

Magazine Overview

Title: jufof - Journal für UFO-Forschung
Issue: Jg. 32, Nr. 197
Date: 05-2011
Publisher: GEP e.V. (Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens)
Country: Germany
Price: 4,50 Euro

This issue of 'jufof' delves into various UFO phenomena, investigations, and related topics, featuring articles by GEP members. The editorial by Hans-Werner Peiniger touches upon ongoing discussions regarding a previously presented 'GOOD-UFO-Fall' and the re-evaluation of cases. He also highlights the magazine's commitment to transparency and supporting new analyses of cases. The editorial also introduces the theme of using lie detectors in UFO witness interviews, noting their inadmissibility in German courts, and mentions articles on 'Orthoteny' and Aimé Michel.

UFO-Beobachtungen: Dokumentationen – Beurteilungen

Fliegendes Dreieck über Aachen

This section details a UFO sighting on February 23, 2011, by Cagdas Y. (24) in Aachen, Germany. The witness described a large, silent, triangular object with three main lights and a smaller central light, which glided over Westpark towards Belgium/Netherlands for about 20 seconds. The witness contacted the police, who reportedly also observed the object and had no conventional explanation for it. Thomas Mertens, the investigator, analyzed the case and, using flight radar data from flightradar24.com, identified a TNT Airways Boeing 737 cargo plane flying at low altitude over Aachen around the time of the sighting. The visual characteristics, including the lights and flight path, matched the witness's description, leading to the conclusion that the object was likely this aircraft. The witness's initial theories included terrestrial experimental aircraft or extraterrestrial origin, but the investigation pointed towards a conventional explanation.

Riesige Lichtkränze über Nörten-Hardenberg

This case, reported by Mike F. (40) on August 0, 1996, in Nörten-Hardenberg, Germany, describes two large, counter-rotating light rings beneath a disc-shaped object. The object was observed for about 5 seconds before ascending vertically into the clouds. Investigator Hans-Werner Peiniger concludes that the phenomenon was likely caused by a 'light effects device,' such as a 'Skytracker' or 'Space Cannon.' These devices use powerful Xenon lamps to project beams into the sky, and their reflections on clouds or atmospheric conditions can create various visual effects, including rotating patterns. The description matches known effects produced by such equipment, which are often used at events and can be mistaken for UFOs.

Weitere Meldungen im Überblick – Teil 5

»Footballförmiges Objekt« über Freiburg

This report concerns a photograph submitted by Alexander L. of a dark, football-shaped object seen in Freiburg, Germany, on July 1, 2011. The object was only noticed upon later examination of the photo. The investigator, Hans-Werner Peiniger, suggests that the object is likely an insect, given its appearance and the context of the photograph.

Articles and Themes

Einsatz von Lügendetektoren...

This article, by Jochen Ickinger, addresses the use of lie detectors in UFO investigations, particularly in the USA. The author discusses the unreliability of such tests and their inadmissibility as evidence in German courts. The magazine's stance is that they do not endorse or utilize these methods for credibility assessment.

Ein Klassiker: Aimé Michels... »Flying Saucers & Straight Line Mystery«

Ulrich Magin examines the work of Aimé Michel, who in 1954 observed that many UFO sightings seemed to align along straight lines, a phenomenon he termed 'Orthoteny.' This article explores the origins and background of this concept.

Außergewöhnliche atmosphärische Erscheinung... ...im Jahre 1882 über Schwaben

This brief mention refers to an unusual atmospheric phenomenon reported over Swabia, Germany, in 1882, suggesting a historical case within the scope of unusual aerial observations.

Other Sections

Kurz notiert: Mentions the launch of a new internet portal, 'ufo-information.de'.

Literatur: Lists book reviews, including 'Atlantis - Dekonstruktion eines Mythos' and 'Investigating the Impossible'.

Impressum: Provides details about the publisher GEP e.V., editorial staff (Hans-Werner Peiniger, Danny Ammon), contact information, and subscription prices. It also notes that the magazine is published on a non-commercial basis.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include the detailed investigation of specific UFO sightings, the critical evaluation of evidence, and the pursuit of conventional explanations where possible. The GEP's editorial stance emphasizes transparency, scientific rigor, and a cautious approach to extraordinary claims, as evidenced by their rejection of lie detector tests and their focus on verifiable data. There is also an interest in historical cases and the broader implications of UFO research for understanding our place in the universe, as expressed in the witness statement from the Nörten-Hardenberg case.

This issue of the JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG, Ausgabe 5-2011, Nr. 197, presents a collection of analyzed UFO/UAP cases, photographic evidence, and a detailed examination of the use of polygraphs in witness credibility assessment.

Case Analyses

"Quallenkörperartige Objekte« über Teneriffa (Jellyfish-like Objects over Tenerife)

This case, dated December 15, 2010, involves a photograph submitted by a witness that, upon closer inspection, revealed three oval, jellyfish-like objects. Investigator Hans-Werner Peiniger determined that the objects were likely reflections in window glass or indoor lights, contradicting the claim that the photo was taken outdoors. The analysis points to dirt particles on the window and reflections of interior lighting as the most probable explanation.

»Unser Kind hat seitdem Angst und schrie« (Our Child Has Been Afraid and Screamed Since Then)

Reported on April 16, 2011, in Kleinbrembach, Germany, this case involves a witness, Ingrid A., who observed a luminous, cloud-like object moving erratically over her garage. The object was described as light-like, without sound, and its movement was unusual. The investigation, led by Hans-Werner Peiniger, classified it as IFO/V2, identifying it as a light effect device. The witness's child experienced fear as a result. The report also references a similar account from another couple, suggesting a possible prank involving a laser pointer.

»Rod« über Brüggen (Rod over Brüggen)

This case from August 22, 2011, in Brüggen (Leine), Germany, concerns a photograph taken by Volker N. After digital processing, a cigar-shaped object with three 'antennae' became visible. Investigator Hans-Werner Peiniger concluded that this object was most likely an insect captured in flight, appearing as a blurred streak due to the camera's shutter speed and the insect's movement. The phenomenon is explained as 'Rods,' which are artifacts created by the rapid wing movements of insects during photography.

Wolkenartiges Objekt in Fotofolge (Cloud-like Object in Photo Sequence)

On July 17, 2011, in Gleichen, Germany, photographer Michael H. captured a sequence of three photos showing a 'cloud-like' object moving at high speed. Investigator Hans-Werner Peiniger analyzed these images and concluded that the object was a bird in flight. The sequence of photos clearly shows the bird's wing movements and silhouette, demonstrating how such an object can be misinterpreted, especially when captured with high-speed photography.

Außergewöhnliche atmosphärische Erscheinung im Jahre 1882 über Schwaben (Extraordinary Atmospheric Phenomenon in 1882 over Swabia)

This historical account, published in a 1917 journal, details a sighting from around 1882 by an unnamed observer in Swabia, Germany. The phenomenon was described as a round, four-colored, moon-sized disc observed in clear skies. While the report suggests it was an atmospheric phenomenon, it notes that typical 'sundogs' (Nebensonnen) do not match the reported angular distance from the sun. The case is classified as an extraordinary atmospheric phenomenon and added to databases of unidentified flying objects prior to 1947.

Einsatz von »Lügendetektoren« bei der Glaubwürdigkeitsbeurteilung (Use of 'Lie Detectors' in Credibility Assessment)

Authored by Jochen Ickinger, this extensive article delves into the controversial use of polygraphs, commonly known as 'lie detectors,' in assessing the credibility of witnesses, particularly in the context of UFO experiences and alleged alien abductions. The article traces the history of polygraph use, citing famous cases like Betty and Barney Hill, and Travis Walton. It explains the technical principles of polygraphs, which measure physiological responses like heart rate, blood pressure, and skin conductivity. However, Ickinger critically examines the scientific validity and legal admissibility of polygraph results, highlighting that the measured reactions are not specific to deception and can be triggered by stress, nervousness, or fear of being falsely accused. The article discusses the limitations of laboratory and field studies, the subjective interpretation of results by examiners, and the potential for manipulation. It contrasts the widespread use of polygraphs in the USA with their inadmissibility as evidence in German legal proceedings. The author concludes that while polygraphs may offer some insights, their results are not definitive proof of truth or falsehood and are subject to significant methodological and interpretative challenges.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The journal consistently adopts a critical and analytical approach to UFO phenomena. The editorial stance emphasizes rigorous investigation, photographic analysis, and the consideration of conventional explanations (insects, reflections, atmospheric phenomena, birds) before accepting extraordinary claims. The journal also explores related topics, such as the psychological and technical aspects of witness testimony and the scientific scrutiny of evidence. The inclusion of historical cases and discussions on investigative tools like polygraphs indicates a broad scope within the field of UFO research.

This issue of the JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG (Journal for UFO Research), Ausgabe 5-2011, Nr. 197, features a critical examination of various topics related to UFO phenomena, historical mysteries, and the reliability of investigative methods.

Polygraph and Lie Detection

The issue begins with a critical assessment of the polygraph, also known as a lie detector. It highlights that the current method does not meet the necessary conditions for reliable control question procedures. The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) conducted a comprehensive study in 2003, concluding that the polygraph's accuracy is only slightly better than chance and far from perfect. Stephen E. Fienberg, chairman of the NAS investigative committee, stated that national security is too important to rely on such a blunt instrument and that more effective alternative methods are needed. A study from Germany by the Institut für Präventionsforschung und Sicherheitsmanagement is also cited, which found that the crime-preventive effectiveness of lie detectors tends towards zero. Researchers were able to arbitrarily mislead experienced users without them noticing, suggesting the method is easily manipulated and lacks criminal-preventive reach.

Two prominent cases are mentioned where the reliance on lie detectors led to harm: Aldrich Ames, a CIA employee who spied for the Soviet Union, passed two polygraph tests despite his espionage, leading to the compromise of numerous operations and the execution of informants. Melvin Foster, suspected in a serial murder case in 1982, failed a polygraph test and was publicly suspected for years until DNA evidence exonerated him and implicated Gary Ridgway, who had initially passed polygraph tests and continued his killing spree, confessing to 48 murders.

The article concludes that in most cases, independent investigators cannot afford to conduct polygraph tests themselves. However, it aims to equip readers with the critical thinking skills to question the use of such methods in investigations. It suggests alternative methods like professional interviews and statement reduction techniques.

Aimé Michel's "Flying Saucers and the Straight Line Mystery"

This section reviews Aimé Michel's classic 1958 book, "Flying Saucers and the Straight Line Mystery." The author, Ulrich Magin, praises the book for its well-thought-out, excellently documented, and refreshingly precise style. Michel's starting point was to find a way to scientifically analyze eyewitness accounts of UFOs, which are often dismissed due to their non-repeatable nature. He recognized that scientific investigation requires generalization, and isolated phenomena that evade systematic experimentation and observation cannot be scientifically studied.

Michel collected reports from the 1954 wave of sightings in France. He identified that some 'flying saucers' were actually IFOs (Identified Flying Objects) such as aircraft, balloons, and meteorites. His novel idea was to move beyond individual sightings and look for quantitative correlations in the data. He focused on the date and location of sightings as 'facts.' Jean Cocteau suggested searching for geographical patterns. Michel's method involved plotting sightings on a map. He discovered 'orthoteny' – straight lines connecting sightings from a single day. He initially believed these lines represented flight paths, but later realized they were not necessarily chronological and could connect different types of UFOs.

Michel's concept of orthoteny aimed to bypass subjective evaluation criteria. He reasoned that if UFOs were a real phenomenon and their patterns could be identified, distinguishing them from IFOs would become simpler. He proposed that sightings on a line, even if mistaken for balloons or meteors, must be genuine UFO reports. This method would allow for the identification of genuine UFO reports without subjective assessment.

However, Michel's orthoteny method faced challenges. He found that these networks only existed for specific periods, such as in France from September 17 to October 16, 1954. He attributed this to the data becoming contaminated by a massive influx of IFOs after that period, as the public, alerted by the earlier wave, began seeing UFOs everywhere. He acknowledged that many later reports were likely misidentifications of known phenomena like meteors and weather balloons.

The review notes that Alexander Mebane, in the American edition of Michel's book, analyzed the 1957 US sighting wave and could not confirm Michel's findings. Mebane also proposed conventional explanations for several sensational American reports that Michel considered authentic. Both Michel and Mebane are described as having a skeptical yet naive mindset, leaning towards accepting UFOs as real rather than explaining them away, but without resorting to complex rationalizations.

Magin concludes that Michel's book is a literary work that offers insights into UFO history and how unconventional approaches can reveal aspects of potential real phenomena. Michel was the first to propose a method for scientifically quantifying UFO reports, which were anecdotal. His failure to fully prove his hypothesis does not diminish the historical significance of this step. The book is praised for its elegant writing style, comparable to Jacques Vallée's "Passport to Magonia."

Horst Bohse's "Atlantis – Dekonstruktion eines Mythos"

This section reviews Horst Bohse's two-volume work, which critically examines the myth of Atlantis and the field of fringe science. Bohse, a sociologist and author, has participated in numerous German-language online forums discussing fringe topics like pre-astronautics and Atlantis.

Volume 1, "Bastelstube Atlantis – Kritik der Grenzwissenschaften" (Atlantis Workshop – Critique of Fringe Sciences), aims to deconstruct the Atlantis myth and critique fringe science. Bohse describes the protagonists of the fringe science scene, analyzes discussions in online communities (which he considers more influential than books), and examines the work of fringe science authors. He argues that these discussions often lead to the development of complex, monstrous world-explaining models. In the final part of Volume 1, he analyzes the methods of fringe science writers, tracing their ideas back to conventional publications.

Volume 2, "Jenseits von Atlantis – Auf der Suche nach einer frühen Hochkultur" (Beyond Atlantis – In Search of an Early High Culture), focuses on the possibility of an early high culture that perished. It includes discussions from forums and a fictional account of the author's future utopia.

Bohse's central thesis is that speculations about lost cultures like Atlantis are projections of modern desires to escape alienation. He argues that UFOs are not extraterrestrial but are 'projected ideas in the sky.'

He delves into historical accounts, including the Sea Peoples' war mentioned in Egyptian texts, and discusses its potential connection to Plato's account of Atlantis. Bohse questions direct links between the Atlantean wars and the Sea Peoples' wars, particularly regarding their origins and timing. He also examines the biblical story of Sodom and Gomorrah as an example of a city destroyed due to moral decay, drawing parallels to the potential destruction of Atlantis.

Bohse's work is characterized by a critical approach, often polemical, towards fringe science and its proponents. The review notes that while Bohse aims for a socio-scientific study, his writing style incorporates essayistic and metaphorical descriptions, making it deviate from a purely academic format. The review also points out some conceptual ambiguities and contradictions in Bohse's use of terms like 'fringe science,' 'esotericism,' and 'metaphysics.'

Current Notes and New Releases

The issue includes a section titled "Kurz notiert" (Briefly Noted) which announces the launch of a new German-language portal, "ufo-information.de." This portal aims to create a unique collection of information material on the UFO phenomenon, operating independently of existing German UFO organizations. It seeks to unite knowledge about scientifically critical approaches to the UFO topic and invites contributions from authors and archive owners.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around critical analysis of popular beliefs and investigative methods. The journal consistently questions claims made within the UFO community and fringe science, advocating for rigorous scientific scrutiny. There is a clear editorial stance favoring skepticism towards unsubstantiated claims, while still acknowledging the historical significance of certain research efforts, like Aimé Michel's pattern analysis. The journal also highlights the importance of clear definitions and logical argumentation in scientific discourse, as evidenced by the critique of Horst Bohse's work for its conceptual ambiguities.

This issue of the JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG (Journal for UFO Research), AUSGABE 5-2011, NR. 197, delves into historical mysteries, fortean phenomena, and the scientific approach to UFO research.

Lost Cities: Rungholt and Vineta

The issue begins by examining the historical accounts and archaeological evidence surrounding the lost settlements of Rungholt and Vineta. Rungholt, a settlement in North Frisia, is discussed in the context of the devastating Marcellusflut in 1362, which submerged coastal lands. The article notes that while the cause of its demise was a natural disaster, the exact location remains a subject of debate, with ethnologist Hans-Peter Dürr having conducted unauthorized excavations.

Vineta, referred to as the "Atlantis of the Baltic Sea," is presented as another example of how legends of sunken cities emerge. Early descriptions by Adam of Bremen around 1075 depict it as a prosperous city named Jumne at the mouth of the Oder River, serving as a vital trading hub. Later, Helmold of Bosau's account from around 1170 suggests the city was destroyed by a Danish king between 1075 and 1170. A common theme in the legends of both Vineta and Atlantis is the moral decay of the inhabitants, leading to divine retribution.

The article questions the timeline of these events, particularly in relation to Plato's Atlantis. It touches upon the idea that the 'downfall' might not always mean physical destruction but could refer to the decline of a culture. The text also critiques the use of Egyptian calendars by some Atlantis researchers, such as Jürgen Spanuth, suggesting misinterpretations of historical sources like Diodorus Siculus regarding lunar calendars and time calculations.

Review: Investigating the Impossible by Ulrich Magin

Ulrich Magin, a known contributor to UFO and fortean research, is featured for his book "Investigating the Impossible: Sea-Serpents in the Air, Volcanoes that Aren't, and Other Out-of-Place Mysteries." The book compiles articles, many originally published in journals like 'Fortean Times' and 'The Anomalist,' covering a wide range of fortean phenomena. Magin's research spans decades, collecting information on occult, paranormal, and seemingly supernatural occurrences.

The book is structured around Empedocles' four elements: Air, Earth, Fire, and Water. The 'Air' section includes topics like the 1561 Nuremberg 'UFO' pamphlet, a 1922 winged sea serpent sighting over the Mediterranean, 'Airships' from the early 20th century, a USO in 1959, and a Mothman-like creature sighting in 2005. The 'Earth' section covers sacred sites, ghosts, and crop circle precursors. 'Fire' discusses forgotten volcanoes and volcanic eruptions interpreted as sea monsters, as well as meteors and submerged objects. The 'Water' section examines sea serpents, including the Loch Ness Monster and creatures reported in various rivers and lakes.

Magin's work is characterized as "soft science," focusing on the interpretation of unusual phenomena and the human element behind them, rather than presenting definitive proof. The book is noted for its extensive historical and current sources, though it lacks illustrations, requiring readers to seek out visual references themselves. The Nuremberg woodcut from 1561 is reproduced in the article as an example.

Review: Über die Wissenschaftlichkeit der UFO-Forschung der GEP e.V. by Olaf Fritz

Olaf Fritz's study examines the scientific validity of UFO research conducted by the Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens e.V. (GEP e.V.), a prominent German UFO research organization. Fritz concludes that GEP e.V.'s research is characterized by a clear focus, a systematic and verifiable methodology, and is reproducible, controllable, and open to criticism. Their findings are regularly published in the 'jufof'. The book is 125 pages and available from Books on Demand.

Ulrich Magin: Kontakte mit »Außerirdischen« im deutschen Sprachraum

Another work by Ulrich Magin, "Kontakte mit »Außerirdischen« im deutschen Sprachraum" (Contacts with 'Extraterrestrials' in the German-Speaking World), is presented. This comprehensive catalog contains over 350 entries of alleged contacts with beings from space or other dimensions, analyzed critically alongside the Zeugen's backgrounds and the social context of UFO beliefs. It covers aspects from abductions to pseudo-archaeological claims and includes a bibliography and indexes. This GEP special issue is 160 pages and priced at €14.00 (€11.20 for members).

GEP and 'jufof' Information

The magazine provides information about the GEP e.V., described as the largest non-profit scientific association for UFO research in Germany. They investigate UFO reports using questionnaires, field research, and background information, working interdisciplinarily with support from authorities and institutions.

The 'jufof' (Journal für UFO-Forschung) has been published since 1980, offering a critical and factual approach to the UFO phenomenon. Each issue documents incoming sighting reports, their classification, and case investigations. The second part features scientific and methodical expert reports, case studies, and international analyses, rounded off by reviews and reader letters.

UFO Definition and Reporting

A definition of a UFO is provided: a perceived object or light in the sky or on land whose appearance, trajectory, and behavior are not logically explainable and remain unidentified after thorough investigation by qualified individuals. The magazine encourages readers who have witnessed a UFO to report it via telephone (0 23 51 / 2 33 77) or through their websites (www.ufo-forschung.de, www.jufof.de), web forum, or email ([email protected]).

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the investigation of historical enigmas, particularly lost cities and their associated myths, and the broader field of fortean phenomena. There is a clear emphasis on presenting research with a critical and scientific approach, as exemplified by the reviews of Magin's and Fritz's works. The editorial stance supports rigorous investigation and documentation of UFO sightings and related unexplained events, encouraging public participation in reporting and research through the GEP e.V. and its publications.