JUFOF - Issue 162 - 2005 06

Magazine Overview

This issue of JUFOF, the Journal für UFO Forschung, is dated 6/2005 (Heft 162, Nov/Dez) and is the 26th year of publication. It is published by GEP e.V. in Germany and costs €3.50. The cover features the main headline "UFO-Beobachtungen" (UFO Observations) and highlights articles on "Entführungen durch Aliens – Teil 1" (Abductions by Aliens – Part 1) by Danny Ammon and "X-Faktor UFO-Zeuge" (X-Factor UFO Witness) by Jochen Ickinger, along with sections on "Kurz notiert" (Briefly Noted) and "Literatur" (Literature).

Editorial and Publisher Information

The "Impressum" section identifies the publisher as Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens (GEP) e.V., founded in 1972. The editorial team includes Hans-Werner Peiniger (hwp) and Mirko Mojsilovic (mmo). The magazine states that contributions do not necessarily reflect the views of GEP and that unsolicited manuscripts and photos are not liable. JUFOF is published bi-monthly on a non-commercial basis, with no author honorarium typically paid. Reprints are allowed only with written permission from GEP and a copy of the publication. The subscription price is €21.00 for one year (6 issues), plus postage. GEP members receive JUFOF as part of their membership, which costs €35.00 per year and includes the "GEP-insider" newsletter. The GEP defines a UFO as an object or light observed that cannot be explained by conventional means.

The GEP is described as Germany's largest non-profit scientific organization dedicated to UFO research. They investigate reports using questionnaires, field studies, and background analysis, working with authorities and institutions. GEP members receive benefits such as the magazine, insider newsletters, assistance with case investigations, literature lending, and discounts on special editions. They can also deduct contributions and donations for tax purposes.

Letters to the Editor and Editorial Stance

In his "Liebe Leser Innen!" (Dear Readers!) letter, Hans-Werner Peiniger apologizes for the delay in publication, citing increased demands from professional and personal life. He announces that Danny Ammon will take over the compilation of the JUFOF's print layout starting in 2006 to streamline the process. He also notes that rising costs necessitate an increase in the subscription price to €25.50 per year starting in 2006. Peiniger observes that despite media coverage, public interest in UFOs remains relatively low, possibly due to the perception that information is freely available online. He argues that serious discussions still occur in print and that German-language websites often lack substantive information, with the exception of Werner Walter's CENAP, who is contemplating a "slow farewell to ufology." Peiniger expresses his view that the ufological worldview has not changed much in 30 years and that the GEP's role is not to convert skeptics or believers, but to provide adequate support and explanations to witnesses of unexplained aerial phenomena. He concludes by wishing readers a happy and successful year 2006.

Contents Overview

The issue includes "UFO-Beobachtungen" (UFO Observations) by Hans-Werner Peiniger, detailing three cases from August, July, and December 2005. "Entführungen durch Aliens – Teil 1" (Abductions by Aliens – Part 1) by Danny Ammon is presented as an overview of the phenomenon. "X-Faktor UFO-Zeuge" (X-Factor UFO Witness) by Jochen Ickinger is also featured. Shorter sections include "Kurz notiert" (Briefly Noted) and "Literatur + Software," listing reviews of books and software such as "UFO Crash in Brazil," "CUFOS UFO Archive II," "Abducted," and various GDATA security products.

UFO Observations - Case Studies

Schmutzteilchen oder UFOs? (Dirt Particles or UFOs?) by Hans-Werner Peiniger:
This case (Fall-Nummer: 20050818 A) from Klein Gaglow on August 18, 2005, involved a witness named Markus N. who noticed three points of light in a photograph taken with a mobile phone. The investigation concluded that these were dirt particles on the car's windshield. The photo was taken with a 2.0-megapixel camera.

Orangerotes Licht über Gaggenau (Orange-Red Light over Gaggenau) by Hans-Werner Peiniger:
This case (Fall-Nummer: 20050715 B) from Gaggenau on July 15, 2005, involved witnesses Jörg F. and two others who observed an orange-red light in the sky. They initially considered it a plane or a hot air balloon but noted its unusual speed and behavior. The object was described as a disc-like shape with arbitrary color arrangements. After observing a jumbo jet, they noted the object crossed its path. The investigation classified it as a model hot air balloon (IFO / V2).

"Ding am Himmel" über Visselhövede ("Thing in the Sky" over Visselhövede) by Hans-Werner Peiniger:
This case (Fall-Nummer: 20051217 A) from Visselhövede on December 17, 2005, involved witness Marek O. who observed a red-orange light moving in the sky. It was described as round with a tail and appeared to be accelerating. The witness took a photo, but it was of low resolution. The investigation concluded it was likely a model hot air balloon (IFO / V2).

"Wie so 'ne Untertasse, so rund« ("Like a Saucer, So Round") by Rudolf Henke:
This case (Fall-Nummer: 20051023 A) from Reilingen on October 23, 2005, involved witness Ilona G., a 54-year-old bank clerk, who observed a round, yellow-orange light with a downward beam while driving. She described it as "like a saucer, so round." The object appeared to be moving with her. She took about 30 photos, but none showed the phenomenon. The witness has a strong interest in esotericism and conspiracy theories. The investigation considered a possible stimulus from a light effect device used at the Hockenheim Motodrom, given the proximity and the description of a beam. The case was classified as NL / IFO / V1 (Light Effect Device).

Discussion and Evaluation of Cases

In the Gaggenau case, the witnesses' descriptions, including the term "disc," and the object's behavior led to the classification as a model hot air balloon. The Visselhövede case also pointed towards a model hot air balloon, despite the witness's initial description of a "thing in the sky." For the Reilingen case, the witness's strong interest in esotericism and conspiracy theories led the investigator, Rudolf Henke, to approach the testimony with caution. Henke noted that the witness had difficulty distinguishing between absolute and apparent size and had incorrect astronomical knowledge (e.g., about Jupiter's visibility). He also highlighted that witnesses with a strong "pre-occupation" with certain themes might be less objective. The witness's personal history, including her emigration from the GDR and subsequent dissatisfaction, was also considered in the context of the "crisis theory" of UFO reports. The possibility of a light effect device from the Hockenheim Motodrom was investigated, with confirmation that such devices had been used, though not officially sanctioned.

Entführungen durch Aliens – Teil 1 (Abductions by Aliens – Part 1)

By Danny Ammon:
This article begins an examination of alien abduction phenomena, noting that cases have been reported for about 40 years. Ammon highlights a recent trend where aliens have entered the scientific mainstream, with studies conducted at Harvard University by Professor Richard McNally and his colleague Susan A. Clancy. Clancy's book on the subject has received significant media attention. The article aims to present known and unknown facts, opinions, and research findings on the abduction phenomenon as of 2005. Ammon explains that abduction research is important for UFO investigation because if these events are proven to be caused by extraterrestrials, it would address a core question of UFO research. Furthermore, the psychological impact on abductees, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, necessitates professional treatment, which would be aided by understanding the true cause of their experiences. The article also touches upon the connection between abduction reports and "normal" scientific fields.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently emphasizes a serious, research-oriented approach to UFO phenomena, distinguishing itself from sensationalism. The editorial stance is to provide a platform for detailed case studies, witness testimonies, and scientific investigations, rather than promoting specific beliefs or debunking claims outright. The GEP's mission is to offer support and explanations to witnesses. There is a recurring theme of caution regarding witness testimony, particularly when individuals have a strong pre-existing interest in esotericism or conspiracy theories, highlighting the importance of verification and critical analysis. The magazine also acknowledges the challenges of UFO research, including rising costs and the perceived abundance of information online, while asserting the continued relevance of print publications for in-depth discussion.

This issue of the JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG (Issue 162, June 2005) focuses on the complex topic of UFO abductions and the methodology of interviewing witnesses. It features in-depth articles that explore psychological interpretations of abduction claims and the scientific approach to gathering witness testimony.

Article 1: Susan Clancy's Research on UFO Abductions

The issue critically examines the work of Susan Clancy, a researcher from Harvard University's psychological faculty, who investigates the phenomenon of alleged alien abductions. Clancy's research centers on the concept of repressed memories, particularly in the context of sexual abuse, and extends this to abduction experiences. She posits that individuals who claim to have been abducted by aliens often cannot recall the events without hypnotic regression. This phenomenon is linked to the broader debate surrounding 'repressed memories,' which includes cases of alleged sexual abuse, satanic rituals, and other traumas.

Clancy's work suggests that the belief in alien abductions arises from a need to explain a series of unexplained life events, such as missing time, 'paranormal' occurrences, difficult childhoods, or unusual psychological states like feeling like an outsider. Hypnotherapy, often used to access these memories, can lead individuals to interpret their experiences as alien abductions. Clancy views this belief as an attribution that provides meaning to otherwise inexplicable events, giving them a sense of profound significance.

From a scientific standpoint, Clancy considers abduction experiences to be anecdotal evidence that does not suffice to prove the extraterrestrial hypothesis. She finds the idea of aliens being responsible for these experiences highly improbable, citing their seemingly clumsy behavior and the unlikelihood of their existence and activity on Earth. She argues that the ETH (Extraterrestrial Hypothesis) as an explanation for abductions is neither proven nor sufficient.

Clancy's research also highlights potential flaws in the methodology of some abduction researchers. She points out that many abduction claims are not falsifiable and that the consistency of descriptions of aliens and their craft can vary significantly. She criticizes the reliance on hypnosis, suggesting it can create false memories, and notes that emotional reactions during recall are not proof of authenticity. Clancy's work is presented as a skeptical approach, drawing heavily from sources associated with organizations like CSICOP, which aim to combat 'pseudoscience.'

However, the article also points out limitations in Clancy's own research. It suggests that her work may suffer from confirmation bias and methodological flaws, such as circular reasoning. The article questions whether her focus on psychological explanations overlooks potential evidence for genuine extraterrestrial encounters. It also notes that Clancy's research is primarily based on individuals who already believe in alien abductions, potentially skewing her findings.

Article 2: X-Faktor UFO-Zeuge: Methodik der Zeugenbefragung (X-Factor UFO Witness: Methodology of Witness Interviewing)

Authored by Jochen Ickinger, this article focuses on the critical role of witness testimony in UFO investigations and advocates for a structured, scientific methodology for interviewing witnesses. Ickinger emphasizes that eyewitness accounts are often the primary, if not the sole, source of information about dynamic and chronological UFO events, especially when physical evidence is scarce.

The article draws parallels with forensic methods used in criminal investigations, highlighting the importance of systematic questioning to gather reliable information and assess the credibility of the witness. Ickinger argues that the 'X-Factor' in UFO sightings is the witness themselves, who is both crucial and inherently uncertain. He stresses that witness interviews are not mere conversations but require a methodical and goal-oriented approach.

• Key characteristics of UFO sightings that underscore the need for careful interviewing include:
• Non-replicability: Sightings cannot be reliably repeated under controlled conditions.
• Time-limited: Most sightings are brief, lasting seconds to minutes.
• Uniqueness: Each sighting is unique, though some may resemble astronomical phenomena or other known events.
• Limited objective evidence: Physical evidence like photos or recordings is often scarce, making witness accounts paramount.
• Retrospective reconstruction: Investigators typically learn about sightings after they have occurred, requiring reconstruction of events.
• Witness testimony as the primary basis: The witness's account is the fundamental source for establishing facts.

Ickinger discusses two main types of interviews: indirect (written questionnaires) and direct (face-to-face or telephone). Direct interviews are favored for their ability to elicit more comprehensive information and allow for better control and assessment of the witness. He outlines different direct interview formats: free conversation, structured interviews, and standardized interviews (questionnaires).

Furthermore, the article details essential qualities for interviewers, including patience, communication skills, tact, objectivity, and a scientific mindset. It warns against the potential for flawed investigations to cast doubt on their results.

The article also touches upon the demographic diversity of the UFO scene, noting that witnesses come from all age groups and professions. This heterogeneity underscores the need for interviewers to possess specific qualifications and employ rigorous methodologies, as there is no self-regulation or recognized standard within the UFO research community.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue presents a dichotomy in the approach to UFO phenomena: one side, represented by the critical analysis of Susan Clancy's work, leans towards psychological explanations for abduction claims, emphasizing the unreliability of anecdotal evidence and the potential for memory distortion. The other side, exemplified by Jochen Ickinger's article, advocates for a rigorous, scientific methodology in investigating UFO sightings, treating witness testimony as a vital but complex data source that requires careful and systematic handling. The overall stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, encouraging a scientific approach to understanding UFO phenomena while acknowledging the limitations of current research and the need for robust methodologies.

This issue of JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG, identified as Heft 162 and dated 6/2005, delves into the critical aspects of UFO investigation, with a strong emphasis on the methodology of interviewing witnesses and analyzing their accounts. The content is primarily in German, reflecting its origin in Germany.

Investigation Methodology

The magazine dedicates significant space to outlining effective methods for conducting UFO investigations. It categorizes interview types into indirect (written, e.g., questionnaires), direct (telephone), and oral (face-to-face) methods. Each type is analyzed for its characteristics, advantages (e.g., cost-effectiveness, control over the process), and disadvantages (e.g., low response rates, potential for third-party influence, interviewer bias).

Preparation for Investigation

A crucial section emphasizes the necessity of thorough preparation before interviewing a witness. This includes gathering preliminary information from press or police reports, understanding the location of the sighting (including proximity to airfields), researching the witness if possible, and consulting astronomical and meteorological data to cross-reference witness accounts. A pre-interview, often conducted by phone, should be brief and focused on generalities, avoiding discussions of explanations or theories, which are reserved for the main interview.

The Witness Report (Zeugenbericht)

The process begins with the witness's free, unprompted account. This free narrative is considered vital for obtaining relevant and accurate information, ideally recorded at the sighting location and following a chronological order. The article stresses the importance of obtaining the witness's consent for audio recording.

The Interview (Die Befragung)

Following the free report, the structured interview phase begins. This should occur in an undisturbed environment, ideally with multiple witnesses interviewed separately to prevent mutual influence. The interviewer has the opportunity to ask clarifying and precision questions. Questions should be concise, clear, and adapted to the witness's language level. The article highlights the danger of suggestive influences, both from the interviewer (e.g., leading questions, expressing opinions) and the witness's environment (e.g., family, media).

Active Listening (Aktives Zuhören)

A key technique discussed is 'Active Listening' or 'person-centered listening.' This involves giving the speaker full attention, not interrupting, avoiding additions, and carefully interpreting what is said. Paraphrasing and verbalizing are presented as tools to confirm understanding and identify potential contradictions or fabrications. The article differentiates between paraphrasing during the report phase (where it should be avoided) and during the interview phase (where it is beneficial).

Communication Filters

The text explains that communication is an interactive process influenced by 'filters.' The sender conveys what they deem important, while the receiver perceives what they find relevant. This can lead to projective or selective understanding. The concept of 'communicative interface' (kommunikative Schnittmenge) is introduced, representing the shared understanding between participants. The article advises interviewers to adapt their language to the witness's level, avoiding jargon and technical terms.

Types of Questions

Open-ended questions (W-Fragen: what, how, who, when, where, why) are encouraged for free responses, while closed-ended questions (yes/no) are best used for follow-ups. Suggestive questions are strongly discouraged.

Avoiding Bias

Influences on the interview can stem from the interviewer's preconceived notions, emotional stance towards the witness, or the witness's own opinions and motivations. The article warns against 'self-fulfilling prophecies' and the tendency to confirm one's own biases.

Concluding the Interview

The final stage may involve a 'case discussion,' which can be critical if the interviewer identifies a potential explanation for the sighting. The article cautions against getting drawn into arguments or making value judgments about the witness or their testimony. If a clear explanation cannot be found, the interviewer should avoid speculation and suggest further research. The goal is a comprehensive interview that gathers all possible information.

Key Cases and Literature

Several specific cases and publications are highlighted:

• UFO Crash in Brazil: A review of Dr. Roger K. Leir's investigation into an alleged UFO crash near Varginha, Brazil, on January 20, 1996. The incident involved reports of a mysterious creature and unusual military activity. The review notes the difficulty in objectively evaluating the witness testimonies but deems the case interesting.
• The Grays: Mention is made of a film adaptation of Whitley Strieber's novel 'The Grays,' focusing on an extraterrestrial race. The casting is still undecided.
• Taiwan UFO Research Center: A report on plans by a Taiwanese company to establish a UFO research center in Guiyang, China, following reports of unusual phenomena in 1994.
• CUFOS UFO Archive II: This section reviews a CD-ROM from the J. Allen Hynek Center for UFO Studies containing three significant works: Ted Bloecher's 'Report on the UFO Wave of 1947,' Isabel Davis and Ted Bloecher's 'Close Encounter at Kelly and Others of 1955,' and a paper on using UFO studies in education.
• Abducted: How People Come to Believe They Were Abducted by Aliens: A review of Susan A. Clancy's book, which explores the psychological reasons behind abduction claims, drawing on research from Harvard University.

Literature References

The issue includes a bibliography of relevant works on interrogation psychology, witness testimony, and communication, including titles by F. Arntzen, K. Behrens, J. Fischer, and F. Schulz von Thun.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the scientific and psychological rigor required for credible UFO investigations. The editorial stance clearly favors a methodical, evidence-based approach, drawing parallels with forensic investigation techniques. There is a consistent emphasis on critical thinking, avoiding bias, and the importance of accurate communication and documentation. The magazine promotes a serious, academic approach to ufology, distinguishing it from mere speculation.

This issue of the JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG (Heft 162, 6/2005) delves into various aspects of the UFO phenomenon, with a particular focus on psychological interpretations and the critical examination of evidence. The magazine features reviews of books and software, alongside reader contributions that spark debate on historical and contemporary cases.

Book Review: 'Abducted' by Susan Clancy

The issue begins with a review by Danny Ammon of Susan Clancy's book, "Abducted". Ammon acknowledges the book's methodological clarity and accessibility, despite the reviewer's reservations about some of Clancy's hypotheses. The book is structured into six chapters, addressing core questions such as the rationale for studying abduction reports, the reasons behind belief in these experiences, the origin of memories when events may not be real, the consistency of reports, the profile of abductees, and their desire to believe in the reality of their experiences. Clancy proposes a synthesis of psychological explanations for these phenomena, attempting to explain the willing acceptance of the 'alien abduction' theory. The reviewer notes Clancy's engaging writing style, which balances complex and sometimes disturbing themes with humor and readability.

Clancy's work suggests that abductees are not 'crazy' and that studying their experiences is valuable, potentially elevating abduction research to a significant area of human knowledge. The reviewer concludes by urging that these suggestions be pursued to further clarify the questions raised by these reports.

Software Reviews

Two software products from G DATA are reviewed. The first is G DATA PowerInfo 2006, a comprehensive telephone directory for Germany. It includes a nationwide database with approximately 34 million entries, offering reverse search functionality to identify callers by phone number and forward search criteria such as name, address, and profession. The software also features phonetic search and a radius search. Its features are presented as a valuable research tool for personal use.

The second review covers G DATA InternetSecurity 2006. Hans-Werner Peiniger highlights the critical importance of protecting computers and data from online threats, especially given the prevalence of email communication and online activities like banking and information gathering. This security suite offers robust virus detection using dual scanners, rapid blocking of new viruses through OutbreakShield technology, and protection against spyware, dialers, and Trojans. It also includes a personal firewall, an anti-spam filter compatible with various email clients, a customizable parental control feature, a web filter to block phishing and malicious websites, and a privacy tool to erase cookies, cache, and browsing history. The review praises the software's comprehensive protection, ease of installation, detailed manual, and year-long support with updates, concluding that it is a worthwhile investment.

Reader Letters: Hildegard von Bingen's Visions

Several reader letters engage with Ulrich Magin's article on Hildegard von Bingen's visions. Rudolf Henke argues that those prone to interpreting unusual perceptions as 'ufological' will resist other explanations, such as the extraterrestrial hypothesis. He posits that while Magin's article raises questions about the origin of these visions, it doesn't explain how they arise in the brain. Henke suggests that Hildegard's visions are best explained as neuropathological phenomena, specifically migraine auras, citing the work of Oliver Sacks. He criticizes Magin for equating 'hallucination' with 'vision' and questions whether Hildegard herself used the term 'hallucination' in the modern sense, given her belief that her visions came from God.

Jutta Behne offers a different perspective, suggesting that whether Hildegard's experiences fit the UFO phenomenon depends on one's definition of UFOs. If UFOs are seen as alien spacecraft, her experiences don't fit. However, if UFOs are viewed as phenomena influencing the psyche, then her experiences could be relevant. Behne finds Hildegard's description of feeling external warmth during a vision potentially linked to an external influence.

Ulrich Magin responds to the reader letters, clarifying that his original note was not about the causes of Hildegard's visions but about how her texts should be interpreted. He emphasizes that Hildegard wrote for an audience with a religious background and structured her accounts to convey a message about God's relationship with the world. Magin acknowledges that while Sacks' theory of migraine auras is plausible, the exact nature of Hildegard's visions and how they were recorded and translated remains uncertain. He notes that Hildegard herself referred to her experiences as 'Schauen' (visions) that occurred internally, which in modern terms could be considered hallucinations, but she believed they were divine revelations.

Publication Information and Offers

The magazine also includes advertisements and information about publications from GEP e.V. This includes special issues (Sonderhefte) on various UFO-related topics, photomechanical reprints of older articles, and an "INFO-Paket" offering a collection of introductory materials on UFO research. A significant offering is the "JUFOF 1980-2000 DVD", which provides the journal's archives in PDF format for a substantial period, making 20 years of research accessible. Information on subscriptions to the "Journal für UFO-Forschung" and ordering procedures is also provided.

Book Feature: 'Im Reiche des Poseidon' by Christian Brachthäuser

A brief feature introduces Christian Brachthäuser's book, "Im Reiche des Poseidon: Spuren einer versunkenen Zivilisation in Westafrika?". The book explores the Atlantis hypothesis, focusing on the work of ethnologist Leo Frobenius and his expedition to Nigeria. It promises an adventurous journey into the relics of a legendary high culture believed to have sunk into the ocean thousands of years ago.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of "Journal für UFO-Forschung" demonstrates a commitment to critically examining the UFO phenomenon. It balances the presentation of controversial topics like alien abductions with rigorous analysis, drawing on psychological and neurological perspectives. The magazine actively encourages reader participation, as evidenced by the extensive letters section discussing historical cases. The editorial stance appears to favor a scientific and evidence-based approach, while remaining open to exploring unconventional hypotheses. The inclusion of software reviews suggests an interest in practical tools that may aid researchers or the general public in information management and security, indirectly related to the broader themes of information and investigation.