JUFOF - Issue 128 - 2000 02

Magazine Overview

This issue of "JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG" (JUFOF), Heft 128, Volume 21, dated March/April 2000, published by the Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens (GEP) e.V., focuses heavily on UFO sightings, their documentation, and critical evaluation. The cover prominently features "UFO-BEOBACHTUNGEN" (UFO Sightings) and lists several articles by various authors, including Hans-Werner Peiniger, Helmut Poppenborg, Illobrand von Ludwiger, Ralf Härtel, Uli Thieme, and Roland Gehardt. The issue also includes a lengthy editorial by Gerald Mosbleck addressing a controversy and a section on UFO cults.

New Publication: "Kontakte mit 'Außerirdischen' im Deutschen Sprachraum"

A new publication by Ulrich Magin, titled "Kontakte mit 'Außerirdischen' im Deutschen Sprachraum," is announced as a GEP special issue (Sonderheft 18). This comprehensive catalog contains over 350 entries detailing alleged contacts with extraterrestrial beings in German-speaking regions. It offers a critical analysis of reports, witness testimonies, and the social context of UFO beliefs, covering aspects from abductions to pre-astronautics. The issue includes a detailed bibliography and indexes, with 160 pages, available for DM 28.00 (DM 22.40 for GEP members).

Editorial: "Liebe Leser Innen!"

Gerald Mosbleck's editorial addresses a "Gegendarstellung" (counter-statement) published in JUFOF, which he notes is unusual. He discusses a dispute involving Illobrand von Ludwiger and a colleague, highlighting concerns about the use of "theatrical antics" and the potential for misrepresenting facts. Mosbleck criticizes the argument about "doctor-patient confidentiality" in the context of a hypnosis regression, suggesting it was used to protect the doctor rather than the patient. He also touches upon the recent mass suicide of a Christian sect, drawing a parallel to the potential dangers of UFO cults and the need for public education.

UFO Sightings: Documentation and Evaluation

This section presents several documented UFO sightings with detailed analysis:

• "Halbkreis aus Strichen" (Semi-circle of Lines) by Hans-Werner Peiniger: This case (Fall-Nummer: 19991225 A) from December 25, 1999, in Jüchen, Germany, involved witness Bianca S. She reported observing three lights that moved erratically and disappeared with clear skies, reappearing with clouds. Later, she observed a semi-circle of lines moving towards the center, with a sphere flying around it. Peiniger concludes that the phenomena were likely reflections from light effect devices (Lichteffektgeräte), possibly used for entertainment or advertising, and thus classified it as a NEAR IFO (Near Identified Flying Object).

• "Lichterformation über Dinslaken" (Light Formation over Dinslaken) by Hans-Werner Peiniger: This case (Fall-Nummer: 19991013 B) from October 13, 1999, in Dinslaken, Germany, involved witnesses Andreas J. and his brother. They observed nine objects that formed a formation and disappeared quickly. Peiniger suggests the objects might have been birds reflecting city lights, but the observation time was too short for definitive identification. It is classified as a NEAR IFO.

• "Kribbeln im Bauch" (Tingling in the Stomach) by Hans-Werner Peiniger: This case (Fall-Nummer: 19970606 B) from June 6, 1997, in Bad Laasphe, Germany, involved witnesses Janosch B. and Martin H. They reported seeing multiple UFOs during a camping trip. One object caused a tingling sensation and slight nausea. The objects were described as point-like to half-full moon in size, with sharp outlines and pulsating light. Peiniger notes the witness's familiarity with UFO literature and suggests that the reported effects might be due to the witness's psychological state rather than the objects themselves. The case is classified as a NEAR IFO.

Discussion and Evaluation of Cases

Across the documented cases, Peiniger emphasizes the importance of critical analysis. In the "Halbkreis aus Strichen" case, he dismisses the witness's belief that UFOs need no further proof, suggesting that the observed phenomena are consistent with known technology like light effect devices. For the Dinslaken case, the short observation time and the possibility of misidentification (e.g., birds) lead to a NEAR IFO classification. In the Bad Laasphe case, while acknowledging the witness's description, Peiniger leans towards a psychological explanation for the reported physical sensations and classifies it as NEAR IFO due to the lack of definitive anomalous characteristics.

"Weißes Licht in der Dunkelheit" (White Light in the Darkness) by Helmut Poppenborg

Poppenborg explores the phenomenon of the "white light" often reported in near-death experiences (NDEs). He connects this to themes of end-time beliefs, birth trauma, and the concept of a "light tunnel" leading to an eternal afterlife. He suggests that these experiences might stem from repressed memories or "engrams" from the embryonic stage, potentially manifesting as sightings of small, embryonal-like entities. Poppenborg discusses how such vague memories could be subconsciously reflected, leading to interpretations of demons or mythical beings in historical accounts. He also touches upon the psychological phenomenon of associating certain physical features (like a bald, egg-shaped head) with negative traits, a concept he links to "private logic" and borderline personality disorder. Furthermore, he discusses the prevalence of oval and round shapes in spacecraft designs, linking them to functional and aerodynamic advantages, and speculates that these shapes might be inspired by the natural efficiency of embryonic forms.

Discussion on the "White Light" Phenomenon

Poppenborg further delves into the psychological and physiological aspects of the "white light" phenomenon. He discusses how dying individuals might perceive a tunnel of light due to oxygen deprivation affecting the brain. He also notes that near-death experiences can evoke feelings of bliss or terror, often leading to religious interpretations. He critiques the tendency towards magical thinking and the potential for manipulation through mysticism, advocating for education as the best defense against irrational beliefs. He also touches upon experimental induction of levitation and the psychological confabulation that can occur in severe illness or injury.

Controversy: "Heiligt der Zweck jedes Mittel?" (Does the End Justify the Means?)

This section features a heated exchange and counter-statements regarding the investigation of a UFO witness (Mr. S.) using hypnosis regression. Illobrand von Ludwiger defends his actions and criticizes Dr. Helmut Lammer's portrayal of the events. Ludwiger denies recommending hypnosis regression himself, stating he merely suggested consulting a doctor in Munich. He accuses Lammer of misrepresenting the situation and using information from a "suspicious source." Ludwiger insists that MUFON-CES did not employ a "medium" and that the investigation was not a "MUFON-CES action." He also criticizes Lammer's association with unconventional methods and the potential for leading individuals into UFO cults.

Dr. Helmut Lammer responds to Ludwiger's counter-statement, clarifying his perspective. Lammer asserts that Ludwiger arranged the investigation with the doctor in Munich, who he claims used unconventional methods, possibly including a medium. Lammer states that he, along with Mr. Stummer and the witness Mr. S., believed a competent hypnosis regression and psychological evaluation were necessary. He expresses concern that Ludwiger is not distancing himself from the doctor despite the controversial methods. Lammer also points out that Ludwiger's own MUFON-CES statutes warn against esoteric or spiritual circles, questioning why Ludwiger would facilitate such a process.

Oliver Stummer provides a separate account of the events surrounding Mr. S.'s case. He explains that he was initially asked to examine a sighting from 1980. While he found no post-traumatic stress, he agreed to help find a therapist for a regression hypnosis, which he viewed as a last resort for Mr. S. to understand the event. Stummer states that he recommended Dr. O. in Munich, who was known for uncovering repressed memories. He clarifies that he did not personally arrange the session and was unaware of the exact cost or the methods used until later. Stummer expresses regret for the situation and believes Ludwiger also regrets the outcome.

"UFO-Sekten" (UFO Cults) by Ralf Härtel

Ralf Härtel discusses the rise of UFO cults and esoteric groups, particularly around the turn of the millennium, which predicted the end of the world. He highlights the internet as a platform for spreading apocalyptic prophecies and beliefs in extraterrestrial saviors. Härtel warns that these groups can be dangerous, especially for young people who may be drawn in due to their lack of critical thinking and a desire for meaning. He emphasizes the importance of intensive public education within the UFO research community to counter irrational beliefs and prevent individuals from falling prey to such cults.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include the detailed documentation and analysis of UFO sightings, the critical examination of research methodologies (particularly hypnosis regression), and the societal implications of UFO beliefs, including the dangers of cults. The GEP, as the publisher, maintains a stance of scientific inquiry, aiming to critically evaluate phenomena while acknowledging the limitations of current understanding and the potential for misinterpretation or psychological factors. The journal actively engages in debates within the UFO community, as evidenced by the extensive counter-statements and discussions on controversial cases and methods.

This issue of the "JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG" (Journal for UFO Research), dated 2/2000, delves into various aspects of the UFO phenomenon, with a particular focus on the Roswell incident, alien abductions, and critical analysis of research claims. The magazine presents a mix of articles, book reviews, and reader letters, reflecting a community engaged in serious, albeit sometimes contentious, investigation.

Articles and Features

UFO Postage Stamps Roland Gehardt introduces a new set of six UFO-themed postage stamps issued by Tanzania. He notes that this is the second time a nation has issued such stamps, following Grenada in 1978. The Tanzanian stamps feature various UFO types and include details about their alleged sightings. Gehardt suggests that these stamps might become sought after by collectors.

Book Review: "Unidentified Flying Objects over Europe" by Illobrand von Ludwiger This section reviews Illobrand von Ludwiger's book, which examines UFO sightings over Europe, particularly Germany. Ludwiger, a systems analyst in the aerospace industry and head of MUFON-CES, argues that UFOs are physical, manned objects and considers time travel a plausible explanation. The reviewer, however, expresses skepticism about Ludwiger's methodology, citing the "Fehrenbach case" as an example where a photographic analysis was flawed due to the use of a toy model. The reviewer criticizes Ludwiger for not adequately addressing psychological factors in UFO sightings and abduction experiences, suggesting that this oversight leads to classifying too many cases as 'unexplained'.

Book Review: "Georgia's Aerial Phenomenon 1947-1987" by Michael D. Hitt Michael Hitt, a former police officer, compiled 234 UFO sightings from the US state of Georgia between 1947 and 1987. The review notes that most reports are from 1973 and that Hitt ends his overview in 1987, believing later reports were influenced by cultural factors like science fiction. The review highlights that many sightings are similar to contemporary ones and that 29 cases involved physical effects. However, the reviewer points out that the book does not critically evaluate all cases, including potential misidentifications (IFOs).

Book Review: "Reaching for Reality: Seven Incredible True Stories of Alien Abduction" by Constance Clear This review discusses a book focusing on 'good' aliens and abduction experiences, presented from a New Age perspective. The reviewer finds the stories lack critical evaluation and often rely on unverified hypnotic regression. The book presents seven abduction accounts, some starting from infancy, describing interactions with benevolent aliens and 'Greys'. The reviewer notes the absence of hypnotic session transcripts and the fragmented nature of the memories, questioning the coherence and reliability of the accounts.

Book Review: "Sternbilder" (Constellations) by Eckhard Slawik and Margit Röser This review covers a book by Eckhard Slawik and Margit Röser that presents a photographic method for depicting the night sky. The book aims to provide a realistic view of constellations, aiding UFO researchers who often encounter astronomical references in witness reports. It includes detailed photos, astronomical explanations, and historical images.

Book Review: "The Milky Way" by Eckhard Slawik This is a review of a large-format poster of the Milky Way galaxy by Eckhard Slawik, offering a panoramic view that includes constellations and celestial objects.

Book Review: "UFO Archive 1" (CD-ROM compilation) This section reviews a CD-ROM containing three classic works: Mark Rodeghier's "UFO Reports Involving Vehicle Interference" (1981), Ted Phillips' "Physical Traces Associated with UFO Sightings" (1975), and Dave Webb's "1973 Year of the Humanoids" (1976). The compilation makes these previously out-of-print works accessible. Rodeghier's work analyzes electromagnetic effects on vehicles, Phillips focuses on physical traces of UFO landings, and Webb examines UFO occupant sightings from 1973, noting the evolution of the 'Grey' alien phenomenon.

"Roswell News: New Disinformation, Part 2" by Uli Thieme This article critically examines claims made by Bill McDonald and Don Schmitt regarding the Roswell UFO. Thieme argues that their 'Roswell-UFO' model is based on futuristic drawings from the 1980s, particularly a 1981 illustration of a stealth aircraft, suggesting 'idea theft'. He questions why McDonald and Schmitt link their UFO model to the Testors company, revealing that Testors produced a model kit of their 'Roswell-UFO'. Thieme also refutes claims made by Michael Hesemann regarding the Roswell incident, particularly concerning the identity of individuals present and the alleged "Hangar 18" at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Thieme provides detailed counter-arguments, citing interviews and documents from other researchers.

Reader Letters

• Uli Thieme's response to M. Hesemann: Thieme strongly criticizes Michael Hesemann's interpretation of the Roswell incident, calling his claims "ignorance = high embarrassment." Thieme refutes Hesemann's assertions about "Hangar 18" and the presence of specific military personnel at Roswell, citing evidence from interviews conducted by Kevin Randle and Don Schmitt. Thieme accuses Hesemann of fabricating dialogues and spreading misinformation, particularly in relation to the M2000 magazine.
• Michael Hesemann's response to Uli Thieme: Hesemann defends his reconstruction of the Roswell crash, stating that he used eyewitness accounts and photos. He criticizes Thieme's "thematic ignorance" and defends his work, accusing Thieme of "malicious insinuations." Hesemann also clarifies his involvement with the Testors company and the development of UFO model kits, mentioning Bob Lazar.

Book Review: "Von Ufos entführt" (Abducted by UFOs) by Ulrich Magin This review discusses Ulrich Magin's book, which explores the phenomenon of alien abductions. Magin categorizes these experiences as a form of belief system in the technological age. The review notes that the book presents stories of 'abductees' and attempts to explain them within a psychological framework.

GEP Special Issues and Info-Paket This section lists various special publications and an information package available from GEP (Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens e.V.), covering topics like UFO research, bibliographies, and historical UFO reports.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFO claims, the distinction between serious research and sensationalism, and the ongoing debate surrounding the Roswell incident. The editorial stance appears to favor rigorous investigation and skepticism towards unsubstantiated claims, as evidenced by the detailed refutations of Hesemann's assertions and the critical reviews of books that lack methodological rigor. There is a clear emphasis on distinguishing between scientific inquiry and what the journal perceives as pseudo-scientific or cult-like approaches to UFO research.