JUFOF - Issue 097 - 1995 01

Magazine Overview

This issue of the "JUFOF" (Journal for UFO Research), issue 1/95, published by the Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens e.V. (GEP), is dedicated to the serious investigation of UFO phenomena. The cover prominently features a catalog of UFO-related books and videos offered by KOPP VERLAG, alongside contact information for both entities.

Editorial and Letters

The "Liebe Leser" (Dear Readers) section addresses the public's reaction to a controversial ARD broadcast by Heinz Rohde, noting the increased interest in UFO research. It highlights ongoing investigations into the Greifswald case, with MUFON-CES and CENAP offering differing interpretations. The section also commends private broadcaster RTL 2 for airing an English UFO film with critical commentary. The editors acknowledge a pagination error in the previous issue and thank Dieter von Reeken for his work on the annual index.

GEP and UFO Definition

The GEP is described as Germany's largest non-profit scientific association focused on UFO research. They define a UFO as an object not explainable to witnesses at the time of observation. The GEP's methodology involves questionnaires, field research, and interdisciplinary analysis, with support from authorities. Membership benefits include the journal, access to literature, and tax-deductible contributions. The journal also provides a definition of a UFO in the narrower sense: an object whose appearance, trajectory, and behavior defy conventional explanation even after thorough investigation.

UFO Observations and Case Files

A significant portion of the journal is dedicated to detailed case files of UFO observations, often classified as NL/IFO (Natural/Identified Flying Object) or DD/IFO (Documented/Identified Flying Object). Many cases are attributed to known phenomena:

• Zeppelins: Several sightings, including those in Bous (1994) and Bottrop (1993), are identified as illuminated Zeppelins used for advertising, with one case noting the witness's claim of measuring high radiation.
• Meteors/Fireballs: A sighting in Hünfeld (1994) is identified as a likely meteor phenomenon or satellite re-entry.
• Light Effect Devices: Numerous cases, such as those in Krefeld (1994), Schiffweiler (1994), Möhringen (1994), Hattingen (1994), and Frammersbach (1994), are attributed to light effect devices, laser shows, or searchlights, often from events or advertising.
• Venus: A bright light observed in Krefeld (1994) was identified as the planet Venus.
• Model Hot-Air Balloons: A sighting in Siegen (1991) is suggested to be a model hot-air balloon.

Each case includes details like date, time, location, witness(es), classification, identification, and investigation status. Some cases include witness testimonies and evaluations by the journal's editors.

"UFOs - And They Do Exist" ARD Broadcast Analysis

Gerald Mosbleck critically reviews the ARD documentary "UFOs - And They Do Exist." He notes the broadcast's massive advertising campaign and high viewership. The film presented a video of a luminous object identified as a dirigible, followed by an "unidentifiable, red luminous object" from Puerto Rico, labeled as a "real" UFO. The Greifswald case was presented with an explanation of light bombs being dismissed in favor of the UFO hypothesis. The broadcast also featured a couple's sighting of "light rings" attributed to "Skytrackers" and an interview with MUFON-CES founder Illobrand von Ludwiger, who presented his classification system and theories.

Mosbleck criticizes the film for not including skeptical viewpoints and for promoting the idea of "real" versus "explained" UFOs. He argues that the Greifswald case could be explained by light ammunition, flares, or military exercises, citing testimony from former NVA soldiers and pilots. He also points out that the film's presentation of the Greifswald case ignored plausible explanations like light effect devices and atmospheric reflections.

The analysis extends to the internal ARD conflict, with physicist Jean Pütz protesting the film's methodology. The journal highlights the media's often sensationalized and uncritical reporting on UFOs, contrasting it with the GEP's more rigorous scientific approach.

The Greifswald Case Revisited

This section revisits the Greifswald case, acknowledging it as one of the best-documented UFO cases with video, photos, and witness statements. While acknowledging the complexity, the journal presents evidence suggesting the objects were likely light ammunition or flares used in military exercises, citing their burn times and the lack of corroborating evidence for advanced alien technology. The possibility of reflections from light effect devices is also considered.

"Tarts over Eupen" - A Critical Look at UFO Reporting

An article by Gero von Randow critically examines the media's handling of UFO phenomena, using the Eupen sightings as an example. He argues that many sightings, including those in Eupen, can be explained by conventional means such as experimental aircraft, light shows, or military exercises (like "Operation Tannenbaum"). Randow criticizes the tendency of UFO proponents to start with the least probable explanation (extraterrestrial visitation) and dismiss more likely conventional explanations. He also debunks the idea of a UFO conspiracy, noting that alleged secret documents often prove to be mundane or fabricated upon closer inspection. The article touches upon the classification systems used by UFO researchers and skeptics, highlighting the lack of truly unexplained cases ("Gufos" and "Bufos").

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The journal consistently promotes a skeptical yet open-minded approach to UFO research, emphasizing the importance of rigorous investigation and the elimination of known phenomena before considering extraordinary explanations. There is a clear critique of sensationalism in media reporting and the tendency to promote unverified theories. The GEP positions itself as a scientific organization dedicated to factual research, contrasting its methods with those of less rigorous groups and media outlets. The recurring theme is the need for critical analysis and the application of scientific principles to understand reported aerial phenomena.

This issue of the "JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG" (Journal for UFO Research), issue 97, dated 1/95, is a German-language publication from the GEP (Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens e.V.). The magazine focuses on UFO phenomena, providing critical analysis, reviews of books and videos, and news from the UFO research community.

Articles and Content

Media Criticism and UFO Documentaries

The issue begins with a critique of media coverage of UFOs, particularly a film by physicist Rhode. Several press reviews from German newspapers (Südkurier, Mannheimer Morgen, Die Rheintpfalz, Offenbach-Post, Berliner Zeitung, Neue Ruhr-Zeitung) are presented, largely criticizing Rhode's film for lacking critical discussion and presenting only UFO proponents' views. One review notes that while scientifically questionable, the film was professionally made and compelling.

A short note highlights a case where a "ghost driver" claimed to be pursued by UFOs and "black men" during a police chase, requiring psychological evaluation.

Video Reviews

"UFO-Video als 'Mogelpackung'" (UFO Video as a 'Rip-off') reviews a video from Creative Moments, criticizing it for repackaging older material from Stanton L. Friedman and Johannes von Buttlar, and presenting it as new information.

UFO Research Groups and Publications

"GAP-Germany" is introduced as a new UFO study group focused on 'contactees'. The revival of the publication "UFO-Nachrichten" is announced, with Werner L. Forster as the new publisher.

Travel and Ancient Civilizations

An article titled "AAS-Reise nach Indien" (AAS Trip to India) describes plans for a trip to the Deccan region of India to visit a temple similar to the Temple of Ezekiel, believed to be an ancient landing site for Rama and Sita.

The Billy Meier Case

"Billy Meier demnächst vor dem Kadi?" (Billy Meier Soon Before the Court?) discusses new information from the USA regarding the Billy Meier case. A company called "Underground Video" has concluded that the Meier case is a hoax, identifying miniature models and deceptive methods used to fake evidence. They intend to hand over their findings to the California Attorney General.

Book Reviews

Several books are reviewed:

• "UFOs AUF DER SPUR: Wahrheit, Schwindel oder Einbildung?" (UFOs on the Trail: Truth, Deception, or Imagination?) is a condensed version of an English text, offering a factual and critical overview of UFO phenomena, including explanations for sightings and psychological aspects. It is recommended as an introduction for interested laypeople.
• "DAS BERMUDA-DREIECK Und andere rätselhafte Orte und Ereignisse" (The Bermuda Triangle and other mysterious places and events) is also mentioned as part of the same series, touching on topics like the "Philadelphia Experiment" and the "Mary Celeste" disappearance, with a brief mention of UFOs.
• "PLANETOLOGIE: EINE EINFÜHRUNG" (Planetology: An Introduction) by Prof. Dr. Ludolf Schultz is a scientific overview of the solar system, planets, and moons. It discusses the possibility of extraterrestrial life, concluding that Earth might be the only planet in our galaxy with intelligent civilization.
• "DIE WEISSE PYRAMIDE: Außerirdische Spuren in Ostasien" (The White Pyramid: Extraterrestrial Traces in East Asia) by Hartwig Hausdorf explores ancient Chinese history, suggesting a connection to extraterrestrial visitors and discussing phenomena like the "Chi-Handchrift," the "White Pyramid," and ancient Japanese myths.
• "SIGNALE OHNE ANTWORT? DIE SUCHE NACH AUSSERIRDISCHEM LEBEN" (Signals Without Answer? The Search for Extraterrestrial Life) by Emmanuel Davoust critically examines the origins of life on Earth and the search for intelligent life in the universe. It discusses the social and cultural impact of potential contact with extraterrestrials.
• "ALIENS: THE REAL STORY" by Jenny Randles is criticized for lacking originality and analytical depth, with the reviewer suggesting older books by Charles Bowen and Jacques Vallée are superior.
• "THE UFO MYSTERY SOLVED" by Steuart Campbell presents a theory that many UFO phenomena can be explained by atmospheric and optical effects, such as planetary stimuli and mirages. The reviewer finds the theory interesting but not entirely convincing.
• "ALLERGIES AND ALIENS: The Visitation Experience: An Environmental Health Issue" by Albert Bullen proposes that electromagnetic smog can cause people to have alien-like hallucinations. The reviewer finds this to be a rehash of older "earthlight" theories.
• "DARK WHITE: Aliens, Abductions, and the UFO Obsession" by Jim Schnabel offers a personal account of abduction stories, interviewing key UFOlogists. Schnabel suggests the "Münchhausen syndrome" as a possible explanation for some abduction claims.
• "TAKEN: Inside The Alien-Human Abduction Agenda" by Karla Turner collects abduction stories, focusing on gynecological experiments and other experiences. The reviewer notes similarities to Hopkins' work but highlights Turner's unique findings.

Software Review

"PhotoMorph 2.0" is reviewed as an affordable and professional graphics animation program. While useful for creating morphing animations, its application to UFO photo analysis is deemed limited, as it assumes linear movement and can create misleading results.

Letters to the Editor

• Ranga Yogeshwar (WDR-Köln) writes about the polarized reactions to his stance on UFO phenomena, emphasizing the need for clear definitions and criticizing the media's exploitation of public fear and skepticism for commercial gain.
• Roland Horn praises the issue, noting the increase in "problematic UFO" cases and the article on the "End of Hypnosis." He suggests ignoring abduction claims derived from hypnosis.
• Uli Thieme criticizes Hans-Werner Peiniger's review of Michael Hesemann's book "Geheimsache UFO," arguing that Hesemann's work is not a balanced presentation but rather a commercial effort to market debunked material and hoaxes.

GEP Information

New members are welcomed, and information about a GEP work meeting in October 1994 is provided, highlighting successful discussions between representatives of various German UFO research groups.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The journal consistently adopts a critical and analytical stance towards UFO phenomena. While acknowledging the existence of unexplained events, it emphasizes the need for rigorous scientific investigation and is highly skeptical of sensationalism, commercial exploitation, and unsubstantiated claims. The editorial stance favors evidence-based research and critical evaluation, often debunking popular theories or highlighting their limitations. There is a strong emphasis on distinguishing between genuine UFO phenomena and misidentifications, hoaxes, or psychological explanations. The journal also critiques media coverage and the way UFOs are presented to the public, advocating for responsible journalism and a more informed public discourse.