JUFOF - Issue 031 - 1984 01

Magazine Overview

This issue of the 'JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG' (Journal for UFO Research), published by GEMEINSCHAFT ZUR ERFORSCHUNG UNBEKANNTER PHÄNOMENE e.V. (GEP), is Volume 5, Issue 1, dated January/February 1984. The cover price is DM 4.00. The main cover headline is 'Rätselhaftes Luftschauspiel: Ufos über Elbe?' (Enigmatic Air Play: UFOs over the Elbe?), highlighting a significant UFO event. The magazine features articles on UFO phenomena, including detailed reports from Germany, Canada, and Norway, alongside theoretical discussions and book reviews.

UFO-Klassifikationen (UFO Classifications)

An advertisement by Lothar Richter presents a brochure titled 'UFO-Klassifikationen'. This 40-page publication, with over 100 illustrations, aims to help hobby UFO researchers classify the wide variety of UFO shapes, formations, flight maneuvers, and behaviors observed. It is available for DM 8.00 (DM 6.40 for GEP members).

Anatomie eines Extraterrestrischen (Anatomy of an Extraterrestrial)

Another advertisement by Lothar Richter promotes a brochure on the anatomy of extraterrestrials. This 44-page booklet, with 24 illustrations, addresses questions about intelligent life in the universe, the physical characteristics of aliens, potential locations, and the possibility of contact. It is priced at DM 10.00 (DM 8.00 for GEP members).

Luftphänomene über Hamburg (Air Phenomena over Hamburg)

This section, authored by H.W. Peiniger and S. Steuer, details UFO phenomena observed over Hamburg. It includes a report on a 'sensational' UFO photo, a case of an 'abduction' in Toronto, and general UFO phenomena. The article also features book reviews and GEP news.

Rätselhaftes Luftschauspiel: Ufos über Elbe? (Enigmatic Air Play: UFOs over the Elbe?)

Authored by Wolfgang Schrich, this article investigates a puzzling aerial display over the Elbe river. The report details multiple sightings and describes various objects, their movements, and color changes. The article notes that initial explanations by astronomers as atmospheric phenomena were rejected by witnesses.

Beobachtung 2 (Observation 2)

• Date: February 20, 1983
• Time: 17:25 - 17:50 MESZ
• Location: A walking path along the Elbe between Rissen and Wedel.
• Witnesses: Dipl. Ing. Richard Kasulke (43), his wife, and their friend.
• Reliability Index: 98.4%
• Objects: 4

Mr. Kasulke and his companions observed four objects. Initially, one object was mistaken for a flock of birds, but it maintained its shape and color while moving. A third object appeared suddenly and then disappeared. Objects 1 and 3 moved towards each other, with Object 3 becoming stationary before vanishing. Object 1 then changed its orientation and colors before disappearing. A second object, described as sickle-shaped, appeared and disappeared in the direction of the setting sun. A fourth object, also sickle-shaped and black, appeared later and moved in the same direction.

Mr. Kasulke created a protocol and a sketch of the observation, which was published in the 'BILD' newspaper. The sketch is explained with details about the objects' angles, colors, and movements. Object 1 was described as changing color from black to red, orange, and yellow, then white. The objects were estimated to be the size of a 50-Pfennig coin at arm's length.

Beobachtung 3 (Observation 3)

• Date: February 20, 1983
• Time: 17:30 - 17:35 MEZ
• Location: Etz, near Pinneberg.
• Witnesses: H.B. (commercial employee), his brother, and his two nieces (7 and 10 years old).
• Reliability Index: 99.23%
• Objects: 1

Mr. B. and his companions observed a single object. The object was described as a massive, solid black 'strip' that appeared to bend like rubber. It had a size of approximately a 2 DM coin at arm's length and was observed at an azimuth of 250° and an altitude of 30°.

Beobachtung 4 (Observation 4)

• Date: February 20, 1983
• Time: 17:30 - 18:00 MEZ
• Location: Jenfeld.

No details provided for this observation in the scanned pages.

Beobachtung 5 (Observation 5)

• Date: February 20, 1983
• Time: 17:42 - 17:49 MEZ
• Location: Iserbrook.
• Witnesses: Stephan Steuer (18), Heinz Steuer (48), and Brunhilde Steuer (48).
• Reliability Index: 98.75%
• Objects: 1

Stephan Steuer observed a black, elongated object hovering vertically in the air. It then bent and changed its position to horizontal. The object was transparent and disappeared. The witness described it as having the approximate length of a matchstick at arm's length.

Beobachtung 6 (Observation 6)

• Date: February 20, 1983
• Location: Near Pinneberg.

This observation is based on a note from Mr. Kasulke, stating that Mrs. S. called him and confirmed his observation in all details. Further details are not provided.

UFO-Phänomene bei Alta, Norwegen (UFO Phenomena near Alta, Norway)

Authored by Elbjørg Fjeldberg, this report details a sighting on October 14, 1982, near Alta, Norway. The witnesses were Ulf Kivijaervi, John E. Hegge, Hegge senior, and Villy Selnes.

• Date: October 14, 1982
• Time: Between 2:00 and 2:30 AM
• Location: Alta, Norway
• Witnesses: Ulf Kivijaervi, John E. Hegge, Hegge senior, Villy Selnes.
• Sighting Type: Three light points emitting beams, forming a radiant ellipsoid.

Three light points appeared over the mountains south-southeast of Alta. Each point consisted of multiple smaller lights. They moved at high speed (estimated 70-80 km in 5 seconds, approx. 55,000 km/h) in a northerly direction. The diameter of each light point was about 1/3 of the full moon's diameter. The objects came to a standstill northeast of Alta, then simultaneously emitted light beams that fell towards the ground in a cone shape with a 15-degree angle. The colors were white with a bluish tint. After 20-25 seconds, the beams widened, and within 2-3 seconds, they transformed into an 'ocean' of light. The lights then extinguished one by one. Immediately after, an ellipsoid object appeared, described as having a solid appearance with shadows. It was estimated to be about 30 km away. The witnesses felt a strange, 'dead' calm during the sighting.

A commentary by an unnamed author suggests that if the distance was 30 km, the objects' diameter would be approximately 90 meters. The ellipsoid's size was estimated at 10-12 degrees, implying a diameter of about 6 km. The report concludes that this observation remains unidentified.

Astronomen sahen Leuchtobjekt (Astronomers Saw a Light Object)

This article by Miloš Krmelj reports on a sighting by nine amateur astronomers in Split, Yugoslavia, on October 3, 1983. They observed an object for 10 minutes using telescopes and other devices. The object was described as more oval than circular, emitting a blue-white light that varied in intensity. It appeared to stop near the constellation 'Ursa Major'. The astronomers ruled out conventional explanations like satellites or aircraft.

They noted that smaller, strongly orange-colored objects were circling the main object. The main object's intensity changed, turning red before disappearing behind the Marjan mountain. The article mentions that other inhabitants in the vicinity also saw the object. Later that evening, another smaller, orange-glowing object was seen moving north.

The article refutes explanations of atmospheric phenomena, stating that the observed object was oval and white-bluish, unlike the appearance of glowing balls, and that it remained visible for an unusually long period.

Kugelblitz sauste durch Flugzeug (Ball Lightning Rushed Through Aircraft)

This brief report from Leningrad (dpa) via TASS describes an incident where a ball lightning phenomenon passed through a Soviet aircraft without causing damage. The ball lightning appeared in front of the pilots, then moved through the cabin and exited through the rear of the plane. The aircraft made an emergency landing due to instrument failure, and holes were found in the nose and tail sections.

Lawrence Fenwick: Entführungsfall in Toronto, Kanada (Abduction Case in Toronto, Canada)

This article by Lawrence Fenwick details a series of UFO sightings in Toronto, beginning on the evening of August 2, 1979. The case was investigated by the Canadian UFO Research Network (CUFORN).

2.08.79., 21.50 UHR

Sarah Hines (14) and her friends Cathy and Jackie were playing when they saw two lights near high-voltage lines. One light moved south, the other north. Cathy's father also saw one of the lights. Two minutes later, Cathy saw two arrow-head shaped objects moving backward from the northwest. A black, cigar-shaped object with bright lights and a green light appeared, making a sound like a slow generator. It was followed by an arrow-head object. An oval object appeared at 21:55, with a greenish mist and four bent 'legs'. It had red and yellow lights and hovered over the roof of a school. It disappeared at 22:05.

3.08.79., 21.50 UHR

The same individuals, plus Cathy's mother and a friend named Bill, went to a different field. The usual sounds of life were absent. Bill and Jackie's brother saw two arrow-head shaped objects. One object appeared to explode silently, with its parts separating. Sarah reported an urge to go to another field, where she saw four bright lights hovering. She returned home and slept for twelve hours.

4.08.79., 21.50 UHR

Teenagers, accompanied by Jackie's father, returned to the field. Jackie's mother saw an arrow-head shaped object moving north at about 20 mph, about 2 feet above the road. Later, two arrow-head shaped objects were seen hovering in the field. They then rapidly accelerated eastward. Sarah again felt compelled to go to the northeastern field, where she saw four bright lights.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are detailed eyewitness accounts of UFO sightings, analysis of object characteristics (shape, color, behavior, speed, altitude), and attempts to classify these phenomena. The magazine consistently presents these sightings as unexplained and often dismisses conventional explanations. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry into UFO phenomena, encouraging detailed reporting and investigation by its readers and researchers. The inclusion of theoretical articles on extraterrestrials and UFO classifications suggests a broader interest in the implications of these sightings.

This issue of the German-language publication "JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG" (Journal for UFO Research), identified as issues 18-21 from 1984, delves into various UFO-related phenomena, including alleged encounters, physical evidence, and book reviews. The magazine, published by GEP, presents a range of cases with a focus on detailed witness accounts and scientific analysis where available.

Sarah's Encounter and Hypnotic Regression

The central narrative revolves around a witness named Sarah, who recounts an experience on August 7, 1979. She describes seeing an arrowhead-shaped object and four 'shadow-like' figures emerge from it. Following this, she experienced missing time, waking up on the ground approximately 15 feet from where she last remembered being. Her mother noted that Sarah's face was highly flushed and her eyes were wide. Physical marks, including a 'needle-like puncture' on her index finger and a scratch on her thumb, were observed. These marks reportedly healed within five days without medical treatment.

Investigating the site, Sarah and her brother, accompanied by Joe Muskat, found a patch of flattened, pale-grey grass, suggesting chlorophyll had been extracted. Radiation tests conducted on August 8th in the area revealed levels of 1.6-1.7, higher than normal background radiation. Further analysis of soil samples on August 17th by the 'Radiation-Protection Laboratory' in Toronto indicated elevated levels of Radon daughters and Cesium 137.

Sarah underwent three hypnosis sessions in October 1979, conducted by a Toronto-based medical doctor specializing in parapsychology. During these sessions, Sarah described being taken inside a brightly lit UFO. She perceived a smell of chicken and noted that her hands could pass through most objects, except for a cat that was apparently being 'raised' on board. She described seven 'shadow-like' beings, 4 feet tall, with a crystalline structure and different colors. These beings communicated telepathically, explaining they needed to study humans to determine the composition of humanoids and stated they had been on Earth before and would return when she was 25. Sarah felt as if she had been on board for a year.

In a subsequent session on October 10, 1979, Sarah described the beings as long and oval, like American footballs, with a crystalline structure. She also mentioned seeing a cat on board that was allowed to roam freely. She was told that they would release her and the cat. She felt as though she had been on board for a year.

On October 18, 1979, Sarah described physical examinations, including an instrument inserted into her mouth and lights shone on her thumbs and index fingers, causing a small hole from which blood was drawn. A machine was placed on her head to ascertain her knowledge. She interacted with a 'normal-looking' humanoid on board who identified himself only by a name starting with 'A'. This individual claimed to be from Earth but not from the immediate vicinity. He mentioned that Sarah was brought aboard first, and he arrived later. He also stated that Sarah would be released, and he would be released later as well. Sarah speculated he might be Canadian.

Sarah also described the presence of various plants and computers on board the UFO. She recounted leaving the UFO through a door that was not distinct, describing it as a small hole in the wall. She was then put to sleep and woke up outside on the ground. She felt the experience was real and not a dream, and that the beings were 'good people' and 'good beings'.

In an interview on October 24, 1979, Sarah described encountering a tall, thin man with unusual shoes who asked her to distance herself from her friends. This man claimed to have partners everywhere and threatened her with persecution if she reported her UFO experience. Sarah perceived his 'thoughts' as stronger than her own desire to call for help. She reported her UFO experiences to him, and he seemed satisfied, though surprised about the mention of computers. He also seemed aware of the other man on board.

The 'Man in Black' (MIB) Incident

Sarah also reported an encounter with a 'Man in Black' (MIB) on October 12th. This individual was described as 6 feet tall, looking like a corpse, with a grey-tinted face and slit-like eyes. He wore a black suit and had a sinister grin. His nose was very long, and his fingers were long with pointed nails. His feet were angled at 90 degrees outwards, and he wore shoes with 3-4 inch heels.

Medical and Psychological Background

It was noted that Sarah had been in psychiatric treatment a few months prior, with the primary reason being school-related problems. A psychiatrist had diagnosed her with a lively imagination. She had previously claimed to have seen a bizarre-looking ghost and had developed a strong interest in occult matters in recent years, although her mother stated she did not have much interest in UFOs.

CUFORN Commentary and Analysis

The CUFORN (Community for UFO Research) researchers had asked Sarah to remain silent about her experience, suggesting that abductions were not uncommon and that any side effects would pass. This approach was linked to a presentation by John Musgrave on 'The UFO Investigator as Counsellor and Healer'.

The hypnotist explained that statements made under hypnosis are not always truthful. However, the doctor noted Sarah's surprise upon hearing the recordings, suggesting she was not fabricating the account. The article also references Dr. Alvin Lawson's work on imaginary abductions, stating it's impossible to lie under hypnosis.

Fenwick inquired about comparing Sarah's physical electrical field before and after hypnosis, a technique suggested by Dr. Harold A. Chan to distinguish true UFO experiences from false ones. The doctor declined, citing the unreliability of the method and his lack of experience with the equipment. The hypnotist suggested ending the sessions due to Sarah's father's recent death and her depressive state.

The article speculates that the true reason for ending the sessions might have been the fear of the 'MIB' who threatened Sarah. It is suggested that deeper hypnosis might have yielded more information. The article points out that the doctor's written summary omitted details about the MIB description, the cat on board, and the dilated pupils Sarah's mother observed for nearly 12 hours. The summen and beeping sounds Sarah heard under hypnosis were also not on tape.

CUFORN concluded that both abductions were genuine, despite the doctor's cautious statement that a definitive judgment could not be made at that time.

Other Cases and Book Reviews

The Pascagoula Abduction: The issue features a review of the book "UFO contact at Pascagoula" by Charles Hickson and William Mendez. This case, occurring on October 11, 1973, involved Calvin Parker and Charles Hickson, who reported being abducted by alien beings while fishing. The book details the event, including investigations by J. Allen Hynek and further research by Mendez.

The Paltsev UFO Incident: A report details an encounter on June 20, 1982, involving Wladimir and Alexander Paltsev in Russia. They witnessed a pancake-shaped UFO, and Alexander was struck by a laser-like beam, resulting in severe injuries. The incident was investigated by the military, who found the area to be highly radioactive and noted that the UFO's spotlight had destroyed insect life.

Book Review: 'The Stairway to Heaven' by Zecharia Sitchin: This review discusses Sitchin's work, which examines the Exodus from Egypt and proposes that the Sinai Peninsula was a land of the gods. It also covers topics like the Pyramids of Giseh and the Sphinx, drawing on ancient texts.

Book Review: 'Handbook of Unusual Natural Phenomena' by William R. Corliss: This comprehensive handbook is described as a compilation of various unusual natural phenomena, including luminous phenomena, atmospheric anomalies, and seismic events. The review highlights the chapter on luminous phenomena as particularly relevant for UFO researchers.

Book Review: 'Die Spitze des Eisbergs' (The Tip of the Iceberg) by J.J. Benítez: This book is presented as a documentary collection of thousands of testimonies about the existence of extraterrestrials, focusing on CE-2 and CE-3 cases in Spain. The review notes its detailed examination of witness credibility and the potential for manipulation.

Book Review: 'UFOS - The Case for Scientific Media' by Stan Seers: This book is presented as an analysis of UFO research from a scientific perspective, criticizing the established scientific community's dismissal of the phenomenon. It aims to provide a scientific short-sightedness of Stan Seers.

MUFON-CES Reports: Several MUFON-CES (Mutual UFO Network - Center for Experiential Studies) research reports are listed for purchase, covering topics such as unexplained aerial phenomena, radiation effects of UFOs, unusual properties of unidentified flying objects, automatic registration of UFOs, and official Soviet and American UFO investigation reports.

Book Review: 'UFO Dynamics' by Berthold E. Schwarz, M.D.: This book is reviewed as a detailed examination of the psychiatric and psychic aspects of the UFO syndrome, exploring the health consequences and causes of UFO experiences. The reviewer notes that Schwarz does not definitively conclude whether contactees are healthy or mentally ill, and also touches upon parapsychological aspects.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are detailed accounts of alleged UFO encounters, abductions, and sightings, often supported by physical evidence or witness testimony. The magazine emphasizes the importance of scientific investigation, even when dealing with controversial topics. The editorial stance appears to be open to the possibility of genuine UFO phenomena, encouraging further research and discussion, while also acknowledging the need for critical evaluation of evidence, as seen in the commentary on Sarah's case and the reviews of various books and reports.

The publication also highlights the challenges in UFO research, including the difficulty of verifying witness accounts, the potential for psychological factors, and the need for rigorous methodology. The inclusion of book reviews and summaries of research reports indicates a commitment to providing readers with a broad overview of the UFO field and related scientific and pseudoscientific inquiries.