JUFOF - Issue 018 - 1981 06

Magazine Overview

Title: JOURNAL FÜR UFO-FORSCHUNG
Issue: No. 6, 1981
Volume: 2nd Year
Price: DM 3.50

This issue of the 'Journal für UFO-Forschung' (Journal for UFO Research) from 1981, published by the GEP (Community for the Research of Unknown Phenomena), focuses on scientific approaches to UFO investigation, including the use of questionnaires and theoretical discussions on extraterrestrial life.

GEP's Mission and Approach

The GEP, a team active since 1972, aims to investigate UFO phenomena from a 'pre-scientific' basis, striving for a scientific approach. Their work involves data collection at the scene, including witness interviews, trace evidence, and measurements with specialized equipment. They publish their findings in the 'Journal für UFO-Forschung'. The GEP believes that UFO phenomena should be approached from a natural science perspective, with a particular interest in electromagnetic effects. They are cautious about the extraterrestrial hypothesis, considering 'contactee' reports to be largely fictional.

Letter to the Editor: Critique of Reich's Work

A translated letter from Jerome Eden of the Planetary Professional Citizens Committee, Inc., USA, criticizes a Mr. Mosbleck for dismissing the work of Wilhelm Reich as 'pure speculation' without providing scientific evidence. Eden argues that criticism should be based on scientific refutation, not slander, and challenges Mosbleck and the GEP to present their evidence.

The GEP's response notes that Mr. Mosbleck will clarify his position and acknowledges that the brief nature of the correspondence limits scientific detail. They also observe similarities in the communication style to that of 'fanatical ufologists', characterized by personal attacks and intolerance.

UFO Investigations with Questionnaires by Hans-Werner Peiniger

This section details the methodology and considerations for using questionnaires as a diagnostic tool in UFO research. It outlines the need for clear evaluation criteria and a structured schema to classify responses. The author discusses the possibility of using factor analysis (FA) for further research, which can eliminate the need for a rigid evaluation schema. The importance of ' Eichung' (calibration) for establishing test norms is also mentioned, though the author notes that raw scores might suffice in some cases.

Interpretation is presented as the crucial step, where findings are translated into meaningful judgments. Examples are given, such as a case being 'not evaluable' due to insufficient answers, or an object being classified as a 'UFO' based on specific criteria. Potential judgment categories include 'not evaluable', 'conventional physical appearance', 'UFO', and 'psychological phenomenon'. For broader research aiming to establish general ufological laws, pre-defined interpretation aids are less feasible, with FA being a more suitable method.

Donald Keyhoe's Audacious Theory

This article presents Donald Keyhoe's theories on UFOs, originally published in 1950. Keyhoe, a former naval major and aviation specialist, was a director of NICAP (National Investigation Committee On Aerial Phenomena). His theory posits that UFOs are extraterrestrial craft, advanced beyond current human technology. He describes three types of 'Flunts' (Flying Saucers): Type I (small, disk-shaped, unmanned), Type II (larger, helicopter-like rotor), and Type III (rocket-like, wingless). He details the advanced, alien construction of these craft, noting unusual materials and assembly methods. Keyhoe suggests that these craft are not from Earth and that Earth has been under observation by intelligent extraterrestrial beings for at least 175 years, with increased activity in recent years, particularly in American airspace.

The article includes illustrations of UFO shapes and flight patterns, as well as diagrams of projected craft. It discusses the possibility of UFOs originating from Jupiter's moon Ganymed, based on symbols found on wreckage. Keyhoe's theories are presented as groundbreaking for their time, influencing military interest and research into UFO phenomena.

Search for Life in the Universe by Dr. Reinhard Breuer

This section shifts to a scientific perspective on the search for extraterrestrial life. Dr. Breuer discusses the scientific basis for speculating about life beyond Earth, moving beyond mere speculation to present new findings from various scientific fields that narrow down the possibilities.

He addresses the question of humanity's place in the universe: are we alone, or are there others? He explores the conditions under which life arises, the nature of life and intelligence, and the potential consequences of contact with alien civilizations.

The article highlights three key scientific disciplines contributing to this search: astrophysics (in conjunction with geophysics and climatology), biochemistry and the theory of the genetic code, and astronomy.

The Ecosphere of the Sun: The article explains the concept of an 'ecosphere' as the region around a star where conditions are suitable for life. It notes that while planets are prime candidates, the interstellar medium can also host the synthesis of organic molecules over vast timescales. Higher life forms, however, require more stable environments, such as planetary surfaces with suitable stellar energy, atmospheric protection, and liquid water.

Atmospheric Evolution: The development of Earth's atmosphere is discussed, referencing Michael H. Hart's computer model. This model suggests that Earth's early atmosphere, rich in carbon dioxide, created a greenhouse effect that kept the planet warm enough for life despite a weaker young sun. A significant climate shift occurred about two billion years ago when carbon dioxide levels dropped, leading to a substantial temperature decrease. The article emphasizes the narrowness of the habitable zone around the sun, with slight variations potentially leading to global freezing or a runaway greenhouse effect like Venus.

Habitable Zones and Stellar Types: Hart's research extended to other stars, indicating that sun-like stars with masses between 0.8 and 1.2 solar masses are the most likely candidates for hosting planets with advanced life. Cooler stars have narrower ecospheres, while larger stars, though having wider habitable zones, have shorter lifespans and emit more harmful radiation.

Radio Astronomy and Communication: A graph illustrates the radio spectrum, showing noise levels from Earth's atmosphere and the Milky Way. A 'quiet' window between 1 and 10 GHz is identified as suitable for radio astronomy and potential communication, notably including the hydrogen line at 21 cm wavelength.

Bibliography of Extraterrestrial Intelligence (1980)

This section provides a bibliography of literature published in 1980 related to extraterrestrial intelligence. It lists books by authors such as Charles Berlitz, William L. Moore, Johannes von Buttlar, Erich von Däniken, and includes works co-authored by Axel Ertelt, Hans-Werner Peiniger, and Johannes Fiebag, covering topics like the Roswell incident, UFO phenomena, and ancient astronaut theories.

Short Reports

Photo Analysis: A photo is presented with a claim of showing an extraterrestrial occupant from a 1948 crash in Mexico. However, the report suggests it is likely an earthly corpse due to the presence of eyeglasses and the material of the 'UFO' wreckage appearing to be of terrestrial origin.

Project Saucer is Serious: This report indicates that the topic of 'Flying Saucers' is being taken more seriously by military and governmental bodies worldwide. A US Air Force committee has studied numerous witness reports, finding that only 30% could be dismissed as hallucinations, leading to the possibility that extraterrestrial visitors are a reality.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The journal consistently promotes a scientific and analytical approach to UFO phenomena, distinguishing itself from sensationalist or purely speculative accounts. There is a clear emphasis on empirical evidence, data analysis (particularly through questionnaires and factor analysis), and the investigation of physical and electromagnetic aspects of sightings. The GEP expresses skepticism towards 'contactee' narratives, favoring a more grounded, natural science perspective. The inclusion of articles on astrophysics, astrobiology, and atmospheric science reflects a broader interest in the scientific context of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, framing UFOs within a larger cosmological and biological framework. The editorial stance is one of cautious inquiry, seeking verifiable data and rational explanations while acknowledging the profound implications of potential extraterrestrial contact.

This issue of the "JOURNAL FÜR UFO FORSCHUNG" (Journal for UFO Research), published by GEP, is the second volume of its second year, dated 1981. It serves as a platform for disseminating research and news within the ufology community, with a particular focus on German-speaking organizations and publications. The issue includes a significant section on book reviews, detailing numerous German-language publications on UFOs, ancient astronauts, and related topics, providing summaries, publishers, and page counts.

Book Reviews

The journal presents an extensive list of reviewed books, offering insights into various aspects of UFO research and alternative history. Among the reviewed works are:

• Johannes Fiebag's "Die Gesandten des Alls" and "Der Zukunftsdenker. Leonardo da Vinci – das größte Genie der Menschheitsgeschichte."
• Hans-Werner Sachmann's "Himmelskräfte. Karl der Große, das 'Lichtphänomen' an der Sigiburg im Jahre 776 n.Chr. und der Heilige Reinhold..."
• Gisela von Frankenberg's "Nommo. Der wiederkehrende Sonnenmensch."
• Sergius Golowin's "Götter der Atomzeit."
• Reinhard Habeck's "Habecks Cartoons."
• Helmut Höfling's "UFOs, Urwelt, Ungeheuer."
• Hermann Ilg's "In kosmischen Bahnen denken."
• Hans Jacob's (Hrsg.) "Geistige Schule von Borup."
• Peter Krassa's "Erich von Däniken, der Besessene" and "Phantome des Schreckens."
• Peter Krassa's "Feuer fiel vom Himmel. Die Tunguska-Katastrophe."
• Gloria Lee's "Warum wir hier sind."
• Ernst Meckelburg's "Besucher aus der Zukunft."
• Joseph Plassmann's "Ist Mars ein bewohnter Flanet?"
• Carl Sagan's "Signale der Erde."
• Siegfried Schöpfer's "Fliegende Untertassen – Ja oder Nein?"
• Erich Schulte Berge's "Flugmaschinen der Götter" and "Bilder vom Besuch der Götter."
• Frank Stranges and Michael Hesemann's "Der Fremde im Pentagon."
• John Weldon and Zola Levitt's "UFOs und Okkultismus."

Each review provides a brief description of the book's content, format, and sometimes its origin or significance.

MUFON-CES Report

A significant portion of the journal is dedicated to the MUFON-CES (Mutual UFO Network – Center for European Studies) report, specifically their eighth report, edited by Dipl.-Phys. I. Brand. This report is highlighted as the most impressive publication in UFO research for the year, spanning over 400 pages. Key findings from the report include:

• An investigation into the "Ingoldstadt" case (September 16, 1979), where MUFON-CES refuted the Bavarian Ministry of the Interior's explanation of 'mirages,' citing Professor Kaminski's assertion that the UFO was the star Sirius.
• An analysis of UFO phenomena in the USSR, based on translated Soviet Samizdat manuscripts, detailing the Soviet authorities' efforts to suppress UFO reports and prevent their publication.
• A critique of the US Air Force's "Blue Book" material, concluding that the investigations were insufficient for accurate assessment and that the material is suitable for supporting 'any hypothesis.'
• Reports on animal behavior in the vicinity of UFOs, suggesting that such observations can make sighting reports more reliable.
• Professor Dr. H. Beck's discussion on "Kugelblitztheorien" (ball lightning theories) and their potential relevance to UFO sightings.
• Corrections and commentaries on previous reports, acknowledging that MUFON-CES is not infallible.
• A report on a "Man-in-Black" (MIB) incident in Langenargen, suggesting it might be a psychic projection.
• A catalog of 1165 UFO cases with electromagnetic and gravitational interactions from 1930 to 1981, coded according to CODAP II.

The MUFON-CES report is praised for being understandable to laypeople and for emphasizing the need for researchers to maintain a certain form to be taken seriously, avoiding unobjective statements and personal attacks.

GEP News and Events

The journal also features news from GEP (Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens – Society for the Investigation of UFO Phenomena), including reports on their participation in events:

• CENAP Meeting in Syrgenstein (September 18-20, 1981): GEP representatives attended this meeting, which was intended to be an international convention but saw cancellations from several countries. The event included a presentation by Werner Walter of CENAP on their work, a critique of the "Fall-Speyer" published in "UFO-Nachrichten," and a discussion on the New Zealand UFO film, deemed a forgery. Presentations were also given on SUFOI, natural phenomena like auroras, and GEP's specific role. Klaus Weber presented UFO films and a film on lens reflections, discussing cases like "Mister X" and the NAGORA series. The event concluded with the launch of three hot air balloons, which created the impression of an unusual phenomenon.
• MYSTERIA Congress in Holzhausen (October 23-25, 1981): GEP was also represented at this congress. Despite a larger expected attendance, only 13 people participated. The program included a film on megalithic graves, a presentation by Hans-Werner Sachmann on "gods" and "culture bringers" using stab-like weapons, and lectures by the Fiebag brothers on myths and the solar system, including the "face on Mars." Rudi Weilmünster discussed "Pyramid Energy" generators. A significant aspect of the congress was a discussion with a female attendee who claimed to have medial contact with extraterrestrials, described as descendants of ancient Earth expeditions from a mysterious continent. She also claimed that current UFOs are piloted by humans from this continent and that she receives signals via a self-constructed antenna.

GEP's History and Future

The journal provides a detailed account of GEP's history, starting from its origins as the "UFO-Jugendclub Lüdenscheid" (UJCL) in 1972, founded by H.W. Peiniger and G. Mosbleck. Initially influenced by DUIST, the group evolved, changing its name to GEP and shifting its focus from a strictly extraterrestrial origin hypothesis to considering it an "exoterrestrial working hypothesis." GEP has become a recognized organization, with an office in Lüdenscheid and a growing membership. They publish the "Journal für UFO-Forschung" and have been members of MUFON-CES. The journal announces that GEP has officially registered as an "e.V." (eingetragener Verein – registered association) on September 16, 1981, with elected board members: Hans-Werner Peiniger (1st Chairman), Gerald Mosbleck (2nd Chairman), Reinhard Kloth (Secretary), and Uwe Viola (Treasurer). GEP expresses optimism for the future, aiming to deepen contact with authorities and collaborate with related organizations.

Our Staff

The issue features photos and brief descriptions of key GEP staff members, including Hans-Werner Peiniger and Gerald Mosbleck, highlighting their involvement in field research and equipment preparation.

Editorial Notes

The editorial section announces the end of the second year of the journal and hints at changes for the next issue, including a potential cover redesign, the removal of advertising pages, and the addition of a fixed cover and 'page cut' for improved visual presentation. They also offer free spine labels for DIN A5 binders.

Next Issue Preview

Topics for the upcoming issue include the reliability index of witness reports, contact attempts with extraterrestrial civilizations, "extraterrestrials" and statistics, and the "Silkeborg-Fall."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFO reports and official explanations, the exploration of ancient astronaut theories, and the detailed reporting on the activities and development of UFO research organizations like MUFON-CES and GEP. The editorial stance appears to be one of rigorous investigation, a willingness to question established narratives, and a commitment to providing detailed information to the ufology community. There is an emphasis on scientific methodology where possible, but also an openness to phenomena that challenge conventional understanding. The journal promotes a serious and organized approach to UFO research, as evidenced by the detailed reports and the formalization of GEP as a registered association.