Intern Avis For NUFOC - 1977 no 04

Magazine Overview

This document is the internal newsletter 'Intern Avis for Nufoc' from Norsk UFO Center, dated June 30, 1977, identified as 'ÅRG 1, NR.4'. The cover features a collage of UFO-related imagery and the magazine's title. The newsletter is published by Norsk UFO Center and is in Norwegian.

Content Summary

The newsletter contains several articles and reports covering various aspects of UFO research and the organization's activities.

Editorial and Subscription Information

The newsletter is available via subscription for kr. 20 per year and can be ordered from Terje Hansen. A postgiro account number (395 396 5) is provided for payments. A crucial disclaimer states that all submitted articles are the sole responsibility of the sender and do not necessarily reflect NUFOC's official stance.

Table of Contents

• The issue includes:
• Comments on previous contributions (including a reference to 'Grunnlovsparagraf 14').
• An organizational report from a NUFOC ØST meeting.
• Discussion on the 'Global Section': development and financing.
• A question about systematic information dissemination to mass media.
• An inquiry into the possibilities offered by the internal newsletter.
• A commentary on a previous issue regarding 'BRUDD PÅ NUFOC'S GRUNNLOVSPARAGRAF 14'.
• An article titled 'KLIPPEGRUNNLAGET'.

Debate on Scientific Criteria ('KLIPPEGRUNNLAGET')

This section critically examines the stance of 'K.S.' regarding strict scientific criteria for UFO research. The author argues that K.S. has been overly zealous in trying to discredit 'sinners' within NUFOC and has misinterpreted or violated 'Grunnlovsparagraf 14' (likely referring to a principle of open-mindedness or due process within the organization). The author questions who has broken this 'paragraph' and what the consequences are. The article contrasts K.S.'s assertion that recent research makes the existence of other intelligent beings in the universe 'increasingly unlikely' with the view that current research actually supports the likelihood of finding extraterrestrial life, citing evidence of water in space and ongoing efforts by the US and Soviet Union to detect extraterrestrial communication. The author criticizes the dogmatic nature of established science, drawing parallels to historical instances where accepted scientific 'truths' were later overturned (e.g., heavier-than-air flight, the Earth being round, the importance of hygiene in hospitals). The piece argues that an over-reliance on established science can hinder progress and innovation, and that the concept of 'impossible' is not absolute in science, as the impossible is constantly being made possible.

'ROMSKIP KONTRA HUL JORD' (Spaceships vs. Hollow Earth)

This article, authored by Per Ottesen, offers a commentary on the 'unfortunate woman in the elevator in Paris' incident, suggesting it's a curiosity but also a sign of seriousness. Ottesen dismisses the 'hollow earth' theory, arguing that Paris's extensive underground infrastructure (sewers, tunnels) would make it an untenable location for such a civilization. He prefers to consider 'another dimension' as a more plausible, albeit speculative, explanation than 'trolls and goblins'. The author also touches upon the idea that UFO observations have not fundamentally changed character over time, but rather human interpretations have evolved. He defends the spaceship theory as a plausible, though not exclusive, explanation for UFOs, distinguishing between 'UFO is a spaceship' and 'UFO could be a spaceship'. Ottesen argues that while scientific skepticism is important, a rigid adherence to current scientific understanding can be limiting, especially when considering the potential advancements of hypothetical civilizations with thousands of years of development. He points out that millions have witnessed phenomena that cannot be explained by terrestrial origins, and that UFO sightings, even on the ground, are often termed 'landings', suggesting a focus on aerial phenomena. He also notes that historical accounts, such as those in the Bible, mention flying objects, indicating a long-standing phenomenon. Regarding claims of UFOs stopping car engines or scaring people, Ottesen suggests these are likely 'side effects' of their activities, possibly related to unknown forces like magnetism, rather than their primary purpose. He also humorously dismisses the idea of 'UFO-nauts' collecting stones and twigs in bags.

'OPERASJON BØRCKE' (Operation Børcke)

This section discusses a dispute involving someone named Børcke, whose 'postscript' is described as a simple insertion into an old feud. The author suggests that giving Børcke more publicity through continued debate is counterproductive. The article mentions that NUFOC has support from active UFO organizations and can demonstrate its publication activities and international contacts to counter Børcke's claims. The author proposes that 'Operation Børcke' be archived and Børcke himself be ignored until further notice.

Organizational Matters (NUFOC ØST Meeting)

• A report from a NUFOC ØST meeting held on May 7, 1977, in Lillestrøm details discussions among representatives. Key points include:
• Improving contact between representatives and between leadership and representatives.
• A proposal for a survey to gauge member interest in active UFO work.
• Plans to establish a telephone alert network.
• Agreement to organize a 'realistic' exercise in the autumn involving aircraft and standard observation/reporting procedures.
• Confirmation of zone boundaries between departments.
• Under 'eventually', proposals for the upcoming national meeting (Landsmøtet) were discussed:
• A tiered membership fee structure: kr. 75 for A-members (active) and kr. 50 for B-members (less active).
• A kr. 25 establishment fee for new members.
• A discussion about merging the two NUFOC publications was raised, with a majority favoring a merger in the longer term, though short-term difficulties were acknowledged. The idea of a joint public magazine was dropped due to high costs and low profit margins.
• A proposal to make contributors solely responsible for the content of their articles in the internal newsletter to protect NUFOC from potential misuse of information outside its official policy.
• A suggestion to limit internal newsletter articles to a maximum of 2 pages.
• A decision to prohibit alcohol at NUFOC national meetings due to the risk of misuse and negative consequences for NUFOC.
• A discussion on the necessity of an 'emergency response section', concluding that it is rarely needed except for major cases, as local members usually respond to observations.
• Proposals for meeting leaders for the next national meeting: Alf Thomassen and Finn W. Kalvik.

Global Section Development and Financing

• This section outlines proposals for the development of the Global Section, including:
• Distribution of correspondence and responsibilities within the section, assigning specific individuals to handle contacts with organizations like MUFON, APRO, NICAP, and CUN, as well as translations for Italian and German materials.
• The NUFOC VESTLANDET section will handle translations of regular Norwegian reports into English.
• Other Norwegian/English translations will be distributed among designated individuals.
• A list of subscribed periodicals is provided: INTERNATIONAL UFO REPORTER, APRO BULLETIN, THE UFO INVESTIGATOR, SKY LOOK, NOTIZARIO.UFO, and Flying Saucer Review.
• The goal is to establish a broad network of contacts in various countries to secure current and relevant material for NUFOC.
• The financing of the Global Section is discussed, with an emphasis on individual responsibility for their functions, particularly covering postage for correspondence. Larger expenses for subscriptions might be covered by a contribution from periodicals and the main fund.
• An example is given of the significant cost of copying materials, with Anton Lidstrøm having spent kr. 500 on copying a single batch of material from the Rapportsentralen, highlighting the financial burden on individuals within the organization.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The newsletter reflects a strong internal debate within NUFOC regarding the scientific approach to UFO research, with a segment of the organization advocating for broader, less dogmatic inquiry, while others (represented by 'K.S.') emphasize strict scientific validation. There is a clear focus on organizational development, communication strategies (both internal and external via media), and the financial sustainability of the group's activities. The editorial stance appears to be one of promoting open discussion and a proactive approach to UFO investigation, while also managing internal disputes and ensuring the organization's public image and operational integrity.

Title: UFO-Forum
Issue: nr. 3/77
Date: 1977
Publisher: NUFOC
Country: Norway
Language: Norwegian
Price: Kr. 5,-

This issue of UFO-Forum focuses on organizational matters, information dissemination strategies, and updates on internal NUFOC activities. It highlights the need for improved communication and systematic approaches to engaging with the public and the media.

Organizational Matters and Dr. Haines' Document

The issue begins by referencing a document previously mentioned in UFO-Forum nr. 1/77 and nr. 2/77, which was exclusively received from Dr. Richard F. Haines, USA. The organization encouraged its field researchers to contribute Kr. 5,- in stamps to help cover postage and printing costs for this document. It notes that only one person has so far requested the document, questioning whether the small contribution or a superficial reading of UFO-Forum has deterred interest. The text emphasizes that this is an isolated incident and not a criticism of 'stinginess.' The organization expresses admiration for those who have supported the initiative. It also points out the surprising nature of Dr. Haines' document, suggesting that it is something every field researcher should examine.

Information Manual and Media Relations

A manual titled "INFORMATION MANUAL - GUIDANCE FOR INFORMATION ACTIVITIES IN NUFOC" is ready. However, due to significant postage costs and the approaching National Meeting, it is deemed best to distribute a portion of it. Departments have already received their copies. The section "SYSTEMATIC INFORMATION TO THE MASS MEDIA?" raises the question of how to approach this systematically. The current information dissemination has been sporadic, often depending on the extent to which newspapers have been willing to write about cases. The text notes that certain newspapers are consistently featured, which may be due to local contacts who have worked on these papers, citing examples from Østlandet, Bergen, Sørlandet, and Trondheim, as well as local papers in Nord-Trøndelag where Anton Lidstrøm's efforts have been notable. This suggests a reflection on NUFOC's own efforts in this area. The idea of a more systematic information dissemination has been raised before but has stalled due to lack of funds and capacity.

Towards a Scandinavian UFO Center and Information Strategy

The possibility of establishing a Scandinavian UFO Center is discussed as a way to improve the practical handling of UFO matters. Thorvald Berthelsen had previously suggested this during a meeting in Sundsvall on May 7th, proposing an internal information system within the Nordic countries to launch synchronized, systematic campaigns to the press. This would involve selecting suitable material for newspapers and distributing it to as many papers as possible across the Nordic region as it becomes available. This approach aligns with the ideal guidelines set forth by Dr. Jacques Vallee in his open letter to UFO-logues in the late 1960s: 1. Register all cases, 2. Get them documented, and 3. Make them public as soon as possible. The article urges a wholehearted commitment to this goal and to initiating systematic information dissemination to newspapers, including foreign cases if they are of interest. Such measures are presented as potentially revolutionary for UFO work and not particularly costly.

Utilizing Newspaper Opportunities and Internal Communication

The section "LET US UTILIZE THE OPPORTUNITIES PROVIDED BY NEWSPAPERS" emphasizes the importance of leveraging media platforms. The issue notes that the fourth number of the internal newspaper has been released. It observes that only a few contributors have utilized its columns for information, communication, and discussion as intended. While acknowledging that this may improve over time, the article reminds readers of the newspaper's significance in this context.

Suggestions for NUFOC Activities and Personnel

The issue includes a section with suggestions for active persons within NUFOC, implying that many individuals have matters they wish to address. Specific suggestions include:

• Kåre Elvik providing an orientation on the telephone warning system, which was highlighted as significant in Sundsvall with ongoing development.
• The new leadership of the Rapportsentralen, operating for about half a year under section leader Egon Nielsen and department leader Kalvik, being asked to provide a brief report on the surprisingly low number of reports in 1977 compared to previous years.
• NUFOC Sør being asked to give a brief overview of its current operations and its potential contributions to the Global Section.
• A note that section leader Odd Bjørn Rørendal, who manages his position excellently, will be able to print in color in UFO-Forum, which is considered a significant advancement for the magazine.
• Kalvik being asked to share his situation after being relieved of his duties with the Rapportsentralen, now managed by Egon Nielsen, and what this means for Kalvik's capacity, particularly concerning the new Global Section.

These points are signed by K. Stenødegård.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the organizational structure and operational efficiency of NUFOC. There is a strong emphasis on the need for systematic information dissemination to the media and the public, moving beyond sporadic efforts. The potential for collaboration, such as the idea of a Scandinavian UFO Center, is explored. The editorial stance appears to be one of encouraging active participation from members, improving internal communication through publications like the internal newspaper, and strategically leveraging external media opportunities. The issue also highlights the importance of documenting and publicizing UFO cases, echoing established principles in the field.