I.N.H. Kontakt

Magazine Overview

This issue of I.N.H. Kontakt, number 3 from May 1998, is a 12-page bulletin from the association I.N.H. Évidence, dedicated to the study of Non-Human Intelligence manifestations. The bulletin is freely reproducible and distributable, but not for sale separately from the complete issue. It is sent to members and other ufological associations in France.

Editorial and Administrative Notes

The editorial team apologizes for the delay in publication, attributing it to printer issues. They explain that the bulletin will now be twelve pages long, with a slight price increase, though subscribers will still receive the number of issues they paid for. They clarify that I.N.H. Contact is not intended to be a full ufology review, a role filled by 'Univers OVNI'. They also address subscription matters, noting delays due to a change in ownership and requesting information about two subscribers whose addresses were lost by CERPA, and another subscriber who changed addresses. They emphasize that subscriptions to 'Univers OVNI' do not include 'I.N.H. Contact', which requires a separate subscription.

Alessandri vs. Velasco: The Trial!

This section details a defamation lawsuit filed by Mr. Velasco, director of SEPRA, against Robert Alessandri. Velasco claims an article in 'Univers OVNI' contained defamatory imputations and injurious expressions. Alessandri defends his use of terms like 'fumiste' (charlatan) to describe Velasco, arguing that Velasco's lack of expertise in his supposed field is undeniable. Alessandri is surprised that the CNES (French National Centre for Space Studies) chose to defend Velasco, whom he views as an 'ambulatory buffoon'. He notes that the CNES, through its Toulouse establishment director M. Trempat, has threatened legal action, accusing Alessandri of gravely damaging the reputation of both the CNES and Velasco. Alessandri asserts that Velasco's errors regarding atmospheric re-entries and other SEPRA domains reflect on the CNES as a whole, questioning his previous respect for the French space agency.

Reviews of Ufological Publications

Several ufological magazines and bulletins are reviewed:

• UFO LOG (No. 1, Sept. 97 & No. 2, Jan. 98): Praised for its forty pages of content, humor, and its aim to study UFOs serenely. Issue 1 covers UFO history, French cases, and sources of confusion. Issue 2 focuses on socio-psychologists and the 'conspiracy' aspect, mentioning Area 51 and Puerto Rico.
• Anomalies (No. 3): A fifty-page publication featuring a dossier on the Kenneth Arnold case, articles on 'Dark Skies', Nazi flying saucers, and a filmed abduction case in Switzerland. It also includes cryptozoology topics.
• Sentinel News (No. 7, Oct. 97 & No. 8, Jan. 98): Described as well-filled (50 pages), with improved presentation. Issue 7 includes translations from the German magazine 'Magazin 2000' on topics like the Varginha case, UFOs and Indian tribes, Philip Corso, and alleged biological warfare. It also covers 'orthoteny' and past spiritual 'remanence'. Issue 8 features articles on UFOs in Israel, the CSETI project, a Botswana landing case, UFOs in Scotland, meteorite threats, and the USAF's Roswell report.
• Tau Ceti (No. 40, June 97 & No. 42, Dec. 97): A large review (around 70 pages) that, like Sentinel News, covers UFOs, cryptozoology, and ancient civilizations. While containing interesting articles, it also includes dubious information from old books. Issue 40 discusses Kenneth Arnold, autopsy inconsistencies, 'conspiracy' theories about giant Saturnian craft, and UFO photos. Issue 42 delves into 'delirious' theories about Nostradamus, the Earth's axis shift, a Siberian explosion, and 'free energy'.
• Ufomania (No. 18, Dec. 97): A 20-page review with articles on a recent Mexico video, a Czech UFO article, crop circles, and the Varginha case.
• Urgence OVNI (No. 7, Jan. 98): Features an article on 'men in black' and governments, along with observations and case retrospectives (Arnold, Roswell, Villas Boas, etc.).
• L'Écho du CERPA (No. 1, Oct. 97 & No. 2, Mar. 98): Issue 1 includes an article on the possible presence of extraterrestrials from a scientific and theological viewpoint, and impressions on the 'Autopsy' film. Issue 2 is criticized for having little about UFOs, focusing instead on organic agriculture and human mutation.
• Ovni Presse (Nos. 15-17, Dec. 97 - Feb. 98): A small bulletin that has expanded to 6 pages, summarizing UFO issues and providing diverse information.
• Murmures d'Irem (No. 6 & 7): A substantial 'zinotérique' (around 130 pages) covering Egypt, paganism, Satanism, angels, runes, Templar survivals, and a summary of Gildas Bourdais' book 'Are They Already Here?'. Issue 7 includes articles on meditation, Akhenaten, New Age, magic, and astrology, as well as interviews. It also reviews Minitel servers dedicated to UFOs, criticizing some for paranoia or being overly focused on specific authors.
• Bulletin de la Cabine Télescope (No. 6, Sept. 97 & No. 7, Jan. 98): This bulletin has grown to 12 pages. Issue 6 features articles on the film 'Contact', artificial intelligence, and original ideas for space objects and extraterrestrial life. Issue 7 discusses messages to extraterrestrials, lunar exploitation, and the possible location of Atlantis.

Publications and Documents Received

• 'On reparle des ovnis à l'O.N.U.!': Reports that the Saint-Marin congress decided to appeal to the UN to study the UFO question, with a proposed commission including international ufologists.
• 'Ça existe numéro 1': A Belgian bulletin from Espace-Terre-Paix, linking UFOs and ecology with a New Age vision.
• 'Cuadernos de Ufologia': Described as the main and most serious Spanish ufology review, covering pilot observations and extensive dossiers on Kenneth Arnold and Roswell.
• 'Henri Chaloupek: Les Débuts de l'ufologie en France': A 60-page text tracing the golden age of French ufology (1950s-70s).
• 'Numéro Spécial de Lumières dans la Nuit': A special issue on UFOs, possibly related to a Canal+ program.
• 'Collectif: Sont-ils parmi nous ?': A book published by Gallimard, summarizing UFO phenomena and history.
• Marc Hallet's works: Reviews of two books by Marc Hallet: 'Critique historique et scientifique du phénomène OVNI' (historical and scientific critique of the UFO phenomenon) and 'La Vague ovni belge ou le triomphe de la désinformation' (the Belgian UFO wave and the triumph of disinformation), which criticizes the SOBEPS.
• 'Les Films de science-fiction et l'ufologie': A book by Marc Hallet analyzing films that may have influenced the UFO myth.
• 'Les OVNI, laboratoire du futur': A book by Michel Picard.
• 'La Terre, mémoire et instrument des civilisations galactiques': A book by Valérie Furstenberger and Rosanna Narducci-Baux.
• 'Vidéos en tous genres': Information about Éternel diffusion, a company specializing in UFO videos.
• 'Bibliothèque ufologique': Announcement of a thematic library on UFOs established by SCEAU/Archives OVNI in Metz.
• 'Associations: U.H.N.': Introduction to the Union ufologique de l'hémisphère nord, presented as a free union for exchanging ideas and information.

The Disinformation According to Jean Sider

This extensive section is a strong rebuttal by Robert Alessandri against Jean Sider's book 'OVNI: le Secret des Aliens'. Alessandri accuses Sider of misrepresenting his arguments, ignoring his evidence, and presenting a biased and dishonest view of the November 5, 1990, UFO wave. Alessandri systematically debunks Sider's claims that the phenomena were atmospheric re-entries of rocket stages. He uses physics principles, witness testimony analysis, and logical reasoning to counter Sider's points regarding object speed, altitude, luminosity, and perceived dimensions. Alessandri criticizes Sider for selectively using information, ignoring contradictory evidence, and resorting to personal attacks. He highlights Sider's alleged misinterpretations of data from NASA, SEPRA, and Russian sources, and accuses him of fabricating evidence and resorting to 'debunking' tactics rather than objective investigation. Alessandri also addresses Sider's accusations of his own dishonesty and attempts to silence him, presenting correspondence and detailing Sider's alleged attempts to prevent the publication of articles critical of his views.

BH. Evidence: The Lawsuit

This section details a separate incident involving Ismaël Belal of GEPS, who ordered ten copies of 'Univers OVNI'. Belal initially expressed satisfaction and offered to distribute the magazine, but later sent a strongly worded letter threatening legal action if the order was not fulfilled quickly, citing a similar negative experience with CERPA. Alessandri responds by explaining that he fulfilled the order promptly and that any issues Belal had were with CERPA, not him. He also addresses Jean Sider's claims that Alessandri had previously demanded a refund from CERPA for undelivered issues of 'Univers OVNI', stating that Sider's accusations are baseless and that Sider himself has refused to communicate directly with Alessandri.

Come-Back

• 'Retour sur Aurena': Robert Alessandri clarifies his position regarding Jeanine Derel (alias Aurena), a contactee from Marseille. While Alessandri does not fully believe in the reality of her 'contacts', he defends her and her group against a disparaging article by Renaud Marhic in 'Phénomèna', accusing Marhic of spreading false information and misrepresenting Derel's affiliations.
• 'Cassette UMMO: Attention, erreur!': An announcement regarding a correction to the advertised duration of the UMMO cassette video. The cassette is 45 minutes long, not 90 minutes as previously stated. The publisher offers refunds to unsatisfied customers. The content of the cassette is described as interviews with personalities related to the Ummo affair, including Jean-Jacques Pastor, Jean-Pierre Petit, Antonio Ribera, and Boris Chourinov.

Small Ads

This section contains classified ads from readers seeking information on specific UFO cases and offering books, magazines, and videos for sale.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of ufological claims, the debunking of skeptical explanations when deemed flawed, and the defense of investigative journalism against personal attacks and censorship. The editorial stance is clearly one of critical inquiry, valuing evidence and reasoned arguments over dogmatic beliefs or dismissals. The magazine actively engages with other ufological publications, offering reviews and commentary, and is unafraid to confront controversial topics and individuals within the field. There is a strong emphasis on distinguishing between genuine scientific inquiry and what the editors perceive as misinformation or 'conspiracy' thinking within ufology itself. The issue highlights the challenges of maintaining integrity and accuracy in a field often prone to sensationalism and personal vendettas.

This document appears to be a scanned magazine issue. However, the provided images are entirely blank, and the OCR output for both pages is empty. Therefore, no information about the magazine's title, content, date, publisher, or any other details can be extracted. The document is effectively unreadable.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

Due to the complete lack of readable content, it is impossible to determine any recurring themes or the editorial stance of this magazine issue.