Inforespace - No 45 - 1979

Magazine Overview

Title: Inforespace
Issue: No. 45
Date: May 1979
Volume: 8th year
Publisher: SOBEPS (Société Belge d'Etude des Phénomènes Spatiaux)
Type: Bi-monthly review

L'ufologie devant l'ONU (Ufology Before the UN)

This article details Jacques Vallée's address to the United Nations Special Political Committee on November 27, 1978. Vallée, born in France in 1939, had a background in computer science, working with NASA and at Northwestern University, where he met J. Allen Hynek. He has authored several books on UFOs and related topics.

Vallée presented the UFO phenomenon with three aspects:

1. Physical Manifestation: This aspect can and should be studied using existing scientific equipment. He referenced a report by Claude Poher to the French Government and the Spanish armed forces' release of UFO case files.
2. Psycho-physiological Aspect: Witnesses often experience disorientation, time distortion, partial paralysis, auditory and visual hallucinations, and long-term psychological effects. Vallée noted that while the UFO phenomenon is real and caused by an unknown physical stimulus, he has not found proof of extraterrestrial arrival.
3. Belief System: This is the aspect that most concerns the UN. Vallée argued that the belief in imminent contact with extraterrestrials is a new social movement, largely emotional, fueled by a lack of serious attention from scientific institutions. This belief is creating new religious, cultural, and political concepts. He stated that the belief in alien visitors is independent of the physical reality of UFOs and reflects a growing gap between the public and science. He also suggested that this belief could be interpreted as a desire for global peace but cautioned that how these emotions are handled will determine its positive or negative impact.

Vallée concluded by stating that scientists he is in contact with are eager to share data and ideas within any appropriate structure offered by the UN.

Nouvelles internationales (International News)

This section briefly touches on the importance of treating the UFO phenomenon as a potential opportunity for human knowledge rather than a threat. It also includes a note about changing addresses for subscription purposes.

OVNI et avion en Italie (UFO and Airplane in Italy)

This report details an incident on March 9, 1978, involving flight IH 662 between Rome and Treviso. Commander Luciano Ascione and his crew observed a small green light that rapidly grew and approached their aircraft at an altitude of 8500m. The object, described as enormous and globular with intense green light, was not identifiable as a standard navigation light or military aircraft. Air traffic control reported no other aircraft in the vicinity. Several other aircraft subsequently reported similar sightings. Commander Ascione stated that the object's behavior was intelligent and guided, unlike any known aircraft. He speculated it could be a secret military craft or something powered by unknown energy sources. The report also mentions a TV broadcast revealing a high number of UFO sightings in Italy during November 1978. The commander expressed a need for a serious, effective international organization to study UFOs, lamenting that witnesses are often dismissed as crazy.

Grande première en philatélie (First in Philately)

This section announces the issuance of a series of three postage stamps and a special block-feuillet by the island of Grenada, promoting UFO research. The initiative is attributed to its Prime Minister, Sir Eric Gairy. The price for the series and block-feuillet is listed as FB 350 (FF 50).

Quelques réflexions sur l'impopularité actuelle de l'hypothèse extra-terrestre (Reflections on the Current Unpopularity of the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis)

This article discusses the declining credibility of the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (HET) within ufological circles, contrasting it with the growing popularity of parapsychology. The author argues that while parapsychological phenomena are acknowledged, the HET is being sidelined. The article suggests that embracing parapsychology offers an easier intellectual path, as it avoids the need to reconcile UFO observations with established physics and astronomy, particularly concerning the constraints of interstellar travel imposed by relativity.

The author outlines several reasons for the disaffection with HET:

• a) Emphasis on Parapsychology: This approach is seen as more accessible to literary minds, bypassing complex physics and astronomy. It allows for more imaginative explanations without the burden of scientific constraints.
• b) Synthesis between Ufology and Parapsychology: While intellectually appealing, this synthesis is presented as lacking empirical support.
• c) Unconscious Psychological Benefits: Rejecting HET can lead to a sense of reassurance by making Earth the unique inhabited planet, thus avoiding the implications of advanced extraterrestrial civilizations.
• d) Ostentation of a Paradigm Shift: This approach aligns with a post-Enlightenment trend towards introspection and a focus on the 'Self', excluding external interventions.
• e) Lack of Hard Evidence: The persistent absence of irrefutable physical evidence (e.g., crash debris, alien artifacts) has led many researchers to focus on psychological and sociological aspects. The author posits that if such evidence existed, it would likely be suppressed by military authorities, creating an 'irreversible' situation.

The article references works by John Rimmer, Leonard H. Stringfield, Pierre Guérin, Bertrand Méheust, and Schwartzman, among others, in its discussion.

Un réseau de surveillance du ciel (A Sky Surveillance Network)

This section, written by Jean-François Gille, a Doctor of Sciences and research fellow at CNRS, addresses the challenges of UFO observation. Gille notes that the sporadic and fleeting nature of UFOs discourages systematic observation. When witnesses do report sightings, they often struggle to react or find information, leading to a loss of valuable data. Many observations are dismissed as atmospheric phenomena, planets, or meteors. The article highlights that even with amateur astronomy experience, some observed phenomena remain unidentifiable.

SOBEPS frequently receives calls from people reporting strange aerial phenomena. While some reports are serious, many are difficult to classify due to lack of information or the phenomenon being later identified as conventional aircraft. Gille points out two main handicaps for witnesses: the difficulty in classifying observations and the tendency for the phenomenon to be misidentified as something normal. He suggests that if UFOs had crashed, especially near urban areas, the information would likely be suppressed by military or governmental entities, making it difficult for civilian researchers to access. He alludes to potential future discussions on information from military structures, referencing the concept of an "Enfer des Bibliothèques" (Hell of Libraries).

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently promotes the scientific and objective study of space phenomena. It encourages reader participation in reporting observations and emphasizes the importance of rational analysis over emotional belief. The editorial stance appears to be open to the reality of UFOs but critical of unsubstantiated claims, advocating for rigorous research and international cooperation. The issue highlights the growing interest in ufology while also noting the challenges and skepticism surrounding the extraterrestrial hypothesis, suggesting a shift towards psychological and sociological interpretations by some researchers.

This issue of Inforespace, published in French, focuses on ufology, with a strong emphasis on scientific analysis and critical examination of phenomena. It features articles discussing the Antônio Villas Boas case, the biological impossibility of extraterrestrial-human crossbreeding, the influence of science fiction on UFO reports, and a photographic case from Kempsey, Australia. The magazine also promotes a guide for UFO observers and discusses the formation of a sky surveillance network.

The Antônio Villas Boas Case and the Myth of Crossbreeding

The article "Les grands cas mondiaux: Le cas Antônio Villas Boas (6) Le mythe du croisement au risque de la biologie moléculaire" delves into the famous Antônio Villas Boas encounter. It begins by referencing a previous article that touched upon the symbolic aspects of the case. The author clarifies that the object's clock-like apparatus had a stationary hand, differing from some interpretations. While acknowledging symbolic interpretations, the article posits a technological explanation as more plausible. It argues that the extraterrestrial hypothesis is the most scientifically grounded explanation for any "external reality" in UFO phenomena, rejecting more speculative interpretations.

The core of this section explores the "myth of crossbreeding," tracing its roots in religious texts and ancient myths across various cultures, including the Judeo-Christian Genesis, the Book of Enoch, Greek mythology, and traditions from Iran, Tibet, and indigenous American cultures. These narratives often describe unions between celestial beings and mortals, resulting in heroes or demigods. Modern ufologists have interpreted these myths as evidence of planned genetic crosses between terrestrial pre-humans and advanced extraterrestrials.

The Villas Boas case is presented as fitting this myth, particularly the partner's gesture of pointing to her belly and then the sky, interpreted as a statement about carrying their child to her home planet. However, the article strongly refutes the biological possibility of such unions. It explains the fundamental principles of genetics, focusing on proteins and nucleic acids (DNA and RNA). The article highlights the universality of the genetic code across all terrestrial life forms, from microbes to plants and animals, including humans. This shared genetic code, with minor variations in amino acid sequences between species (e.g., human vs. chimpanzee, dog, pigeon, tuna, wheat germ), strongly suggests a common origin for all terrestrial life.

Given this biological reality, the article concludes that crossbreeding between different evolutionary lineages is impossible. It dismisses hypotheses involving secret societies or ancient advanced civilizations as lacking evidence. Instead, it proposes that the "sons of God" from ancient legends and modern UFO humanoid figures might be terrestrial beings who have collaborated with extraterrestrials for planetary exploration and surveillance. These terrestrial collaborators might be unwilling captives subjected to biological manipulation and mental conditioning, serving as obedient servants adapted to their tasks.

Interpretations of UFO Encounters and "Induced Dreams"

Another section discusses interpretations of UFO encounters, particularly the concept of "induced dreams." It notes a growing trend among ufologists, influenced by figures like Pierre Guérin, to consider that a significant portion of details reported by witnesses of close encounters might be illusory, stemming from "induced dreams" within the witness's mind. This perspective suggests that the presence of a UFO might trigger a release of the subconscious, leading to symbolic components in the narrative. Franck Boitte's earlier work on the José Antônio da Silva case is cited as an example where symbolic components were evident.

The article also touches upon a psychoanalytic interpretation of UFO abductions by Josiane and Jan d'Aigure, who liken the experience to a regression into the maternal womb. They suggest that the physical contact and cleansing described by Villas Boas could be a reenactment of infantile experiences. While acknowledging the interest of this interpretation, the authors critique its over-reliance on Freudian theories, which are considered somewhat outdated. However, they concede that such interpretations do not negate the UFO phenomenon itself, but rather suggest that UFOs might act as "triggers of subjectivity," inducing false perceptions of a purely subjective origin.

Michel Monnerie is mentioned as potentially observing that these "triggers of subjectivity" could also be produced by known phenomena that the witness fails to recognize. The article notes that these second-degree interpretations, while offering explanations for modern inter-planetary sexual relations, do not fully account for the ancient myths of crossbreeding. Franck Boitte suggests that the universal concordances in these legends might stem from humanity's tendency to populate the heavens with supernatural beings, with sexual and romantic themes naturally leading to similar narratives across diverse civilizations.

Ultimately, the article reiterates the certainty of the biological impossibility of any crossbreeding between beings from different evolutionary lineages.

The Kempsey, Australia UFO Sighting (July 21, 1975)

This section presents a photographic case study from Kempsey, Australia, on July 21, 1975. Glen and Jennifer Waters reported observing a large, bright object hovering over the countryside. The object, initially white, changed to red and then a brilliant yellow, exhibiting pulsating movements. It remained stationary for about ten minutes before ascending vertically and disappearing. The witness managed to take three photographs of the object. The report notes that the area around Kempsey is known for frequent UFO sightings, with mentions of possible landings in 1971, 1972, and 1973. The article concludes that further information on this case is awaited.

Review of Bertrand Méheust's "Science-fiction et soucoupes volantes"

The issue includes a critical review of Bertrand Méheust's book, "Science-fiction et soucoupes volantes." The reviewer acknowledges the book's originality and the author's talent but expresses reservations about fully endorsing its conclusions. Méheust's central thesis is that many UFO characteristics and humanoid descriptions found in contemporary reports already existed in science fiction prior to 1947. The review highlights Méheust's comparison of UFO witness accounts with pre-war science fiction novels, noting the striking similarities.

The article explains Méheust's argument that UFOs operate within a framework of myths, with common shapes like spheres and discs representing "machine-mandalas" and circular craft symbolizing the intrusion of another world. He suggests that these themes resonate deeply with the human subconscious. However, Méheust also acknowledges the physical evidence associated with UFOs, such as traces and radar confirmations, indicating that the phenomenon is not purely imaginary.

The review discusses Méheust's refutation of various objections, including the idea that science fiction could have accidentally predicted UFO characteristics. Méheust argues that science fiction predictions are usually approximations and that real-world technological advancements (like the moon landing) often differ significantly from fictional portrayals. He concludes that science fiction could not have foreseen the specific manner in which an extraterrestrial technology would manifest.

The "Observer's Guide" and Sky Surveillance Network

The magazine promotes the acquisition of a new guide, "Le Guide de l'Observateur," published by SOBEPS. This guide, approximately forty pages long and richly illustrated, provides practical advice for participating in observation evenings organized by various European groups. It covers the initial phases of UFO observation: confronting the witness with the sky and identifying an unusual phenomenon, and observing and classifying the phenomenon.

Furthermore, the article announces the intention to establish a sky surveillance network in Belgium, in collaboration with the French Société Varoise d'Etude des Phénomènes Spatiaux (S.V.E.P.S.). This initiative aims to organize sky observation evenings, inviting amateur astronomers and anyone interested to dedicate time to observing the sky. The network seeks to gather data and potentially organize information and training sessions. Participation is encouraged, with contact information provided for the SOBEPS secretariat.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of Inforespace adopts a critical and analytical stance towards ufology. It emphasizes scientific rigor, particularly in biology and genetics, to debunk the myth of extraterrestrial-human crossbreeding. The magazine explores the psychological and symbolic dimensions of UFO encounters, including the concept of "induced dreams" and psychoanalytic interpretations, while maintaining a skeptical perspective on purely subjective explanations. The influence of science fiction on UFO reports is a significant theme, suggesting a deep connection between collective imagination and perceived phenomena. The publication actively promotes structured observation and data collection through its "Guide de l'Observateur" and the proposed surveillance network, indicating a desire to move ufology towards a more systematic and evidence-based approach. The overall editorial stance appears to be one of cautious inquiry, seeking rational explanations while acknowledging the persistent and intriguing nature of UFO reports.

This issue of "Chronique des OVNI" (Chronicle of UFOs) focuses on a critical analysis of Bertrand Méheust's work, particularly his book which explores the relationship between UFO phenomena and science fiction. The article, titled "1883: une vague de faits insolites" (1883: a wave of unusual facts), delves into historical UFO cases and scrutinizes Méheust's arguments and methodology.

Analysis of Bertrand Méheust's Thesis

The article begins by examining Méheust's dismissal of hypotheses suggesting that science fiction authors predicted UFOs through precognition or external influence. Méheust posits that the imagery of flying saucers is sufficiently ingrained in human imagination to not require an external source. The author of the article, however, questions this, suggesting Méheust's own culture in science fiction is limited.

Méheust rejects the idea that UFOs can be reduced solely to human psychology, arguing that the phenomenon is not bound by the logic of the human psyche and exhibits an 'obsessive, hyperspecialized dream' confined to a narrow range of forms. He also highlights the elusive and absurd nature of UFO encounters, noting a disconnect between the 'base panoply of flying saucers' and the phenomenon's global structure.

The article then explores Méheust's concept of the UFO phenomenon as 'mythico-physical,' suggesting it is a materialization of classic human myths and symbols, akin to parapsychological phenomena that demonstrate the influence of consciousness on matter. However, it differentiates UFOs by their greater scale and the total evasion of experimentation.

Méheust also proposes that UFOs are 'thematic-plastic,' adapting their themes to contemporary beliefs and modes of thought, making the observer's psyche crucial. He avoids the term 'mimicry,' as it implies intent from an external entity.

Coincidences and Discrepancies between SF and UFOs

The article dedicates significant space to evaluating the coincidences between science fiction and UFO reports, as presented by Méheust. While acknowledging the existence of numerous parallels, the authors question the depth and significance of these connections. They argue that Méheust's analysis is flawed by a lack of quantitative data on the frequency of these themes in SF literature and a failure to account for 'non-coincidences' – themes present in UFO reports but absent in SF, and vice versa.

• Key discrepancies highlighted include:
• Object Shapes: While Méheust focuses on spherical, discoidal, and cigar-shaped objects, the article points out the existence of rectangular plate-shaped UFOs, which are less common in SF.
• Appearance and Disappearance: SF often depicts abrupt appearances and disappearances, but UFO reports include more varied and sometimes bizarre modalities, such as disintegration and reassembly of objects.
• Physical Traces: Méheust acknowledges that ground traces (flattened grass, holes) are rare in fiction. The article emphasizes that UFO ground traces are often associated with mysterious forces or monsters, not specifically with landing craft, and that many common UFO trace phenomena (chemical changes, soil heating) are absent in SF.
• Physiological Effects: While paralysis is found in SF, other reported effects like torpor, temporary blindness, and digestive issues are not.

The authors contend that the most frequent elements in SF, like abductions, are less common in UFO reports, suggesting an inversion of frequency for certain analogous details.

Critiques of Méheust's Ufological Knowledge

A substantial portion of the article is dedicated to identifying what the authors perceive as "regrettable errors" and "neutral errors" in Méheust's ufological culture. They argue that his bibliography, while extensive, is heavily skewed towards SF and parapsychology, with a limited focus on core ufological literature. This perceived deficiency leads to factual inaccuracies and misinterpretations that, according to the authors, inadvertently favor 'mythico-physical' hypotheses.

• Specific examples of these alleged errors include:
• The Antoine Séverin Case: Méheust claims the witness would fall into a coma and require hospitalization, whereas the witness only fainted and recovered at home.
• The Brazilian Cancer Cure Case: Méheust states the real name of the healed person is known, which the authors dispute, noting the case's reliance on an anonymous letter.
• Radar-Visible Objects: Méheust's claim that radar-visible objects that cease to transmit echoes are a common SF trope is challenged as unsubstantiated.
• Jung's Hypothesis: Méheust's assertion that Jung's ideas on UFOs were unprecedented is contested, with the article citing earlier proponents.
• The Assevent Case: Méheust uses this case to illustrate large UFOs, but the authors suggest it might be a misinterpretation of a moonrise under specific atmospheric conditions.
• The Valderas Case: Méheust cites this as a successful prediction, but the authors label it a "beautiful fake" debunked by Claude Poher and themselves.
• Stephen Michalac at Falcon Lake: Méheust's description of Michalac wearing a welding helmet on his way home from work is called "hilarious" and inaccurate.
• Jules Verne and Submarines: Méheust credits Jules Verne with predicting the submarine, but the authors point out that submarines existed before Verne's birth.
• Jimmy Guieu's Novel: Méheust uses a description from a 1958 novel to illustrate a UFO phenomenon observed in 1968, violating his own rule of using SF predating 1947 and ignoring an earlier similar case from 1952.
• The 1897 Airship Wave: Méheust overlooks the extraterrestrial hypothesis (Martian origin) discussed at the time, focusing only on the 'secret invention' theory.
• Abduction Cases: Méheust claims adult victims are spared women and children, but the article presents examples of female abductions, including cases documented by John Keel.

Historical UFO Wave of 1883

The issue also features a section on the "Chronicle of UFOs" detailing the unusual events of 1883. It highlights observations from Zacatecas, Mexico, where the first known photograph of a UFO was taken on August 12, 1883. The article also recounts an observation by astronomer E. Walter Maunder at the Greenwich Observatory in November 1882, who described a strange celestial visitor, a bright disk moving rapidly across the sky.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critical examination of ufological literature, particularly the work of Bertrand Méheust. The editorial stance is one of skepticism towards simplistic explanations and a demand for rigorous, well-documented research. The authors emphasize the importance of accurate historical context, quantitative analysis, and the consideration of all evidence, not just that which supports a particular hypothesis. They advocate for a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between cultural narratives (like science fiction) and reported anomalous phenomena, while also highlighting the limitations of Méheust's "mythico-physical" and "thematic-plastic" interpretations due to perceived factual and cultural lacunae in his work.

This issue of INFORESPACE (Issue 41, September 1978) focuses on a series of unusual aerial phenomena and UFO sightings reported primarily in the year 1883. The magazine presents detailed accounts and analysis of these events, drawing from various historical sources and publications.

Key Articles and Reports

The 'Torpedo' of Greenwich (November 1882)

The issue begins by recounting an observation made 46 years prior by an astronomer. This phenomenon, described as a 'torpedo,' was observed over Greenwich. It was noted for its distinct outline, uniform surface, and a color consistent with auroral light, specifically the 'greenish-yellow' associated with krypton spectral lines. The object moved with a regular, uniform advance from magnetic east to west, differing significantly from typical auroral displays like draperies or arcs. The observer deduced it was not a meteor in the traditional sense but a solid cosmic substance. The report links this observation to a major magnetic storm from November 17-21, 1882, and a significant sunspot group.

The Arvika 'Meteor' (February 5, 1883)

On February 5, 1883, near Arvika, Sweden, a meteor of unusual size and aspect was observed. A witness crossing Lake Glasfjorden saw the object moving southeast to northwest, then abruptly changing direction to the southeast. Its brightness varied from that of an ordinary star to the sun, emitting white and yellow light and jets of sparks. At its point of directional change, it possessed a distinct tail and was observed for nearly fifty seconds. The article emphasizes that such abrupt directional changes and prolonged observation periods make it unlikely to be a typical meteor.

The English Channel Incident (March 31, 1883)

This section details a peculiar event that occurred in the English Channel aboard the steamship Aquila. The ship was violently shaken by a sudden, intense sea, causing extensive damage to cabins, the engine room, and the paddle wheels. Water flooded the ship, and portholes broke. Remarkably, five minutes after this violent disturbance, the sea became perfectly calm. The report suggests this was an unusual phenomenon, possibly caused by 'new forces, poorly controlled.'

The Sussex 'Meteor' (August 28, 1883)

Reported in the magazine 'Knowledge,' this incident involved a brilliant light observed in Sussex, England, on the night of August 28, 1883. The light appeared in the east-northeast sky, projecting a radial illumination upwards. It emitted flashes of bright light and had a tail-like appearance that disappeared. The witness initially thought it might be a rising moon or a distant fire but later concluded it was neither. The phenomenon ceased abruptly.

The Liverpool Observation (August 29, 1883)

Coinciding with the Sussex observation, a similar phenomenon was reported over Liverpool by W.K. Bradgate. He observed a brilliant luminous cone, about 7 degrees above the horizon, with a total length of approximately 5 degrees. The apex was concentrated, leading him to consider it might be Jupiter. Using a telescope, he noted the light had an intensity comparable to the 'ash-colored light of the Moon.' The phenomenon lasted for thirteen minutes before fading and disappearing.

Other 1883 Sightings

The issue also mentions other sightings in 1883:

• September 11-13: Professor Swift in Rochester, New York, observed a similar phenomenon.
• September 21: Mme. Harbin observed an event over Yeovil, Somerset, England.
• September 24: In Karingon, Sweden, a remarkable phenomenon occurred involving a violent cyclone, followed by a brilliant light described as an egg-shaped meteor that traversed the sky, changing colors and lasting about sixty seconds.
• November: Further UFO sightings were reported globally.
• December 28: A 'lazy meteor' was observed over Newcomerstown, Ohio, USA. A newspaper clipping from the 'Cleveland Herald' describes a 'mysterious visitor' – a large, bright light that appeared in the eastern sky and moved northward, leaving a brilliant trail that illuminated trees.

Synthesis and Conclusion

The author, Michel Bougard, concludes that 1883 was an exceptionally unusual year for natural phenomena. He posits two possibilities: either it was a year of rare natural events, or it represented a high-altitude reconnaissance by UFOs, anticipating their closer visits in 1896-97. The article emphasizes the connection between magnetic disturbances on Earth and solar perturbations, a concept that took over twenty years to be fully understood.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently focuses on unexplained aerial phenomena, historical UFO sightings, and related scientific and investigative inquiries. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious investigation into these events, presenting witness testimonies and scientific discussions without immediate dismissal. There is a clear interest in historical accounts and the potential for extraterrestrial visitation, as evidenced by the concluding hypothesis about a 1883 reconnaissance mission.

Book Reviews and Advertisements

The latter part of the magazine features a substantial list of books related to UFOs, extraterrestrials, and mysterious phenomena, providing titles, authors, publishers, and prices. There are also advertisements for optical instruments (telescopes, binoculars) and real estate services, as well as a promotion for back issues of the magazine 'INFORESPACE' itself.

Books listed include:

• *La Nouvelle Vague des Soucoupes Volantes* by Jean-Claude Bourret
• *Le Nouveau Défi des OVNI* by Jean-Claude Bourret
• *Mystérieuses Soucoupes Volantes* by Fernand Lagarde
• *Les Soucoupes Volantes Viennent d'un Autre Monde* and *Black-Out Sur les Soucoupes Volantes* by Jimmy Guieu
• *Le Livre Noir des Soucoupes Volantes* by Henry Durrant
• *Les Dossiers des OVNI* by Henry Durrant
• *Premières Enquêtes sur les Humanoïdes Extraterrestres* by Henry Durrant
• *Soucoupes Volantes, 20 Ans d'Enquêtes* by Charles Garreau
• *Face aux Extraterrestres* by Charles Garreau and Raymond Lavier
• *Des Signes dans le Ciel* by Paul Misraki
• *Chroniques des Apparitions Extraterrestres* by Jacques Vallée
• *Le Collège Invisible* by Jacques Vallée
• *Disparitions Mystérieuses* by Patrice Gaston
• *Le Dossier des Soucoupes Volantes, Ceux Venus d'Ailleurs* and *OVNI Dimension Autre* by Jacques Lob and Robert Gigi
• *Les Objets Volants Non Identifiés: Mythe ou Réalité?* by Dr. J. Allen Hynek
• *Les Soucoupes Volantes: Affaire Sérieuse* by Frank Edwards
• *Les Étrangers de l'Espace* by Major Donald E. Keyhoe
• *Le Procès des Soucoupes Volantes* by Claude McDuff
• *Les OVNI en U.R.S.S. et Dans les Pays de l'Est* by Julien Weverbergh and Ion Hobana
• *Aux Limites de la Réalité* by J. Allen Hynek and Jacques Vallée
• *Le Livre des Damnés* by Charles Fort

Advertisements:

• VIKING: Specializing in binoculars, spotting scopes, telescopes, astronomical lenses, microscopes, and repairs.
• A. RENIER: Real estate expert offering appraisals, inventory of fixtures, sales, and rentals.
• INFORESPACE Back Issues: Availability of back issues from 1973-1978, covering topics like Belgian UFO cases, humanoid sightings, the 1908 Tunguska event, and historical UFO accounts.