Inforespace - No 40 - 1978

Magazine Overview

Title: Inforespace
Issue: No. 40
Date: July 1978
Volume: 7th year
Publisher: SOBEPS asbl (Société Belge d'Etude des Phénomènes Spatiaux)
Country: Belgium
Language: French

This issue of Inforespace, a bimonthly review dedicated to ufology and spatial phenomena, presents a range of articles and investigations. The cover prominently features the magazine's title and a subtitle indicating its focus on ufology and spatial phenomena, along with the issue number and date.

Editorial and Organizational Information

The magazine is the organ of the SOBEPS asbl, based in Brussels, Belgium. The leadership includes Michel Bougard as President, Lucien Clerebaut as Secretary General, and Christian Lonchay as Treasurer. The editorial committee consists of Michel Bougard (Editor-in-Chief), Alice Ashton, and Jean-Luc Vertongen. The printer is M. Cloet & C° in Brussels, and Lucien Clerebaut is the responsible editor.

The magazine also provides subscription details for 1978 and previous years, with different rates for ordinary subscriptions and student subscriptions in Belgium, France, and other countries. Information is also given on how to purchase back issues from 1972 to 1977, highlighting the content of these earlier publications, which include historical UFO cases, photo dossiers, investigations, and studies on topics like UFO propulsion and 19th-century UFOs.

SOBEPS is described as a non-profit association focused on the rational and objective observation and study of spatial phenomena, aiming to disseminate information without prejudice. They encourage readers to share any relevant information and communicate observations of spatial phenomena promptly.

Articles and Investigations

"Commentaire concernant les aspects physiques du phénomène OVNI et les 'faisceaux lumineux tronqués'"

Authored by Auguste Meessen, Professor of Theoretical Physics at the Catholic University of Louvain, this article delves into the physical characteristics of UFOs, particularly the phenomenon of "truncated light beams." Meessen critiques an earlier article by M. Jan Heering, aiming to counter a sense of pessimism regarding the scientific study of UFOs. He argues that the physical aspects of UFOs are observable and should be investigated, suggesting that the phenomenon represents a major scientific challenge, potentially involving extraterrestrial civilizations.

Meessen proposes that the "truncated light beams" are not simply light but are likely beams of ionized particles, possibly protons, with variable energy. He explains that the sharp termination of these beams can be understood by the energy loss of the particles as they interact with the air, causing ionization and light emission. The length of the beam is determined by the initial energy of the protons, with higher energies resulting in longer beams, potentially extending for kilometers. He dismisses the idea of electron beams due to their less defined nature and the significant deviations they would undergo. Meessen also discusses the thermal effects observed by witnesses, attributing them to the interaction of these particles with air molecules, transferring momentum.

He addresses the observation that these beams are intensely luminous but do not reflect light, suggesting it might be due to the nature of the light itself or the witness's visual adaptation. He cites the case of Yolié Moreno at Trancas, Argentina, who experienced heat but no harm when her arm passed through a "solid light" beam. Meessen concludes that the phenomenon of truncated light beams is not as incomprehensible as it might seem and that understanding such aspects can provide a key to comprehending other, more unusual aspects of UFO manifestations.

"Nos enquêtes: L'humanoïde de Vilvorde, cinq ans après."

This section presents an updated investigation into the Vilvorde humanoid case, which occurred in December 1973. The initial report in Inforespace No. 18 was met with skepticism. The article details a follow-up investigation conducted by the author, who met with the witness (referred to as M. V.M.) multiple times.

The witness, a typographer by profession, is described as introverted and not easily emotional. He has interests in archaeology, geology, and history. The article notes that the witness's initial reticence to share full details during the first investigation meant that some elements were not fully disseminated at the time. The author emphasizes the importance of including all reported data, even if seemingly unusual, to avoid distorting the research.

The article recounts the circumstances of the investigation's origin, stemming from a friend of the witness's fiancée, whose employer was a member of SOBEPS. The initial collection of information took place in January 1974, with a follow-up meeting in March and a second interview on July 28, 1978.

The Witness and the Incident:

The witness described the humanoid from behind as it passed over rubble in the garden, using a device resembling a "mine detector" or "Geiger counter." He later redrew the being, noting the absence of a transparent helmet that was present in earlier sketches. The humanoid was described as emitting a "similar clarity to a firefly" and being "very luminous and sparkling." The "detector" device was the same color and appeared independent.

The witness could not definitively state whether the being was material, suggesting it might have been a projected image. He described its movement as slow and heavy, comparable to astronauts on the moon. Notably, no traces were found the following day, which he found incomprehensible, especially given the cold weather and dry ground.

He expressed surprise at his own passive reaction, stating he felt as if he were in a cinema and did not think to alert others. After the humanoid and a "saucer" disappeared, he prepared a light meal and went back to sleep.

The "Salute" of the Humanoid:

When the witness directed his torchlight at the humanoid, it turned, raised its arm, and made a "V" sign before leaving. The witness interprets this gesture in a historical context of peace, but acknowledges that modern interpretations might lean towards diabolical interventions.

"Vision Christique" (Christic Vision):

This section details a separate, earlier experience of the witness from his youth (around 1964-1965). During a religious discussion involving Mormons and Protestants, the witness, feeling detached from the dispute, left the gathering. While walking home late at night in the snow, he saw a luminous disk emitting golden rays, with a face resembling Christ wearing a crown of thorns at its center. The face appeared to be sweating despite the cold. A telepathic message was received: "Do not return to these people."

The vision vanished abruptly, and the witness returned home. He later retrieved his belongings without explanation. He reflects that perhaps he should have remained silent, as his recounting of the incident has led to him being bothered.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the physical and observable aspects of UFO phenomena, seeking rational explanations grounded in physics and scientific investigation. There is a clear emphasis on witness testimony and detailed case studies, such as the Vilvorde humanoid encounter. The editorial stance appears to be one of open-minded scientific inquiry, encouraging the study of UFOs as a significant scientific challenge while cautioning against unfounded speculation. The inclusion of the "Vision Christique" alongside the humanoid case suggests an interest in exploring the psychological and potentially spiritual dimensions of anomalous experiences, though the primary focus remains on physical phenomena and their potential extraterrestrial origins.

This issue of "Les grands cas mondiaux" focuses on "OVNI en Papouasie (4)" and delves into various UFO-related topics, including witness testimonies, case analyses, and theoretical discussions on the nature of UFO phenomena. The publication date is September 1978.

Witness Testimony: M. V.M.

The issue begins with an interview with a witness identified as M. V.M., who recounts an experience involving a humanoid and a UFO. Following this incident, M. V.M. reports experiencing unexplained phenomena in his home, such as strange noises. He expresses a desire for privacy and states that he is not interested in religious interpretations of his experience. He also mentions having had a persistent feeling of being guided. The investigator notes that M. V.M. has been interviewed extensively, with no discrepancies found in his testimony, and that he has not sought financial gain or notoriety from the incident. The investigator concludes that M. V.M. honestly describes phenomena he believes he was involved in, but acknowledges that the exact nature and meaning of these events remain open to interpretation by specialists.

The European UFO Wave of Late 1973

The article places the witness's observation within the context of a UFO wave that affected Europe in the last quarter of 1973. A statistical table (Tableau I) shows the number of reports submitted to SOBEPS during this period, highlighting a significant number of incidents with a high degree of strangeness. Notable cases from this period include the quasi-landing at Boondael, the case presented, the Warneton case, and the encounter at Aische-en-Refail. The period from November 1st to December 31st is described as particularly remarkable, with four unidentified reports in December, including three close encounters.

Analysis of UFO Phenomena: Parapsychology vs. Extraterrestrial Hypothesis

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to a theoretical discussion comparing the extraterrestrial hypothesis with the parapsychological model for explaining UFO phenomena. The author, Pierre Viéroudy, argues that the extraterrestrial hypothesis, in its classical form, faces several challenges:

• The sheer number of observations: Thousands of sightings per year are difficult to reconcile with the idea of occasional visits.
• Lack of evolution in phenomenon structure: UFOs and their occupants have reportedly remained largely unchanged over centuries, which seems anachronistic for highly evolved beings.
• Inexplicable technological parallels: The evolution of UFO shapes mirrors human technology (e.g., medieval sailing ships, 19th-century paddle steamers, 20th-century airplanes, and modern saucers), which is difficult to explain if they are truly extraterrestrial.
• The problem of interstellar travel: The vast distances involved in interstellar travel remain a significant obstacle.

Viéroudy proposes that the parapsychological model offers a more comprehensive explanation. This model suggests that the universe is not purely material but also psychical, and that our thoughts can influence reality, leading to temporary materializations. This perspective integrates both physical and psychological aspects of the phenomena. The author draws parallels between UFO phenomena and known parapsychological events, such as ectoplasmic materializations and spiritism, noting similar patterns in their structure and the psychological profiles of witnesses.

He also addresses the apparent contradiction between physical evidence (traces, photographs, radar data) and psychological data (witnesses' beliefs, evolving descriptions). Viéroudy argues that the classical scientific method, based on the logic of the excluded middle (either physical or psychological, but not both), leads to an impasse. He advocates for a broader logic, inspired by quantum physics, that can accommodate phenomena that are both physical and psychological.

The Boïanaï Case (Papua New Guinea, 1959)

The magazine then reconstructs the events of June 26, 1959, in Boïanaï, Papua New Guinea, involving multiple witnesses who reported seeing UFOs. The article critically examines the explanations proposed by skeptics like Klass and Menzel, who attributed the sightings to astronomical objects, primarily Venus.

• Witnesses' Accounts: Several witnesses, including R.P. Gill and Stephen Gill Moï, described objects and beings. The witnesses provided drawings of the objects, and the differences in these drawings were seen as evidence of independent observation rather than copying.
• Skeptical Explanations: Klass and Menzel suggested that Venus, due to atmospheric conditions and optical illusions, could have been mistaken for a UFO. They pointed to the apparent size exaggeration when using the "arm's length" method and the descriptions of light phenomena.
• R.P. Gill's Rebuttal: R.P. Gill, a missionary, defended the witnesses, highlighting their intelligence and the fact that many were educated adults, including teachers. He argued against the idea that they were easily suggestible or simply mimicking him. He also presented evidence of his own visual acuity, including medical reports from Dr. W. M. Box showing consistent vision measurements over several years.
• Astronomical Context: The article includes a diagram of the night sky over Boïanaï on June 26, 1959, showing the positions of planets like Venus and Mars. It notes that Venus and Mars were visible and would have set around 9 PM, consistent with some of the observation times. However, R.P. Gill points out that Venus set in the west, while the main UFO remained visible longer and in a different location.
• Other Observations: The article also mentions other observations in the region, including one by Ernie Evenett near Giwa and another by M. and Mme Orwin and M. I.L. Smith in Baniara, suggesting a localized wave of sightings.
• Critique of Skepticism: The author criticizes Menzel's approach, suggesting it relies on a series of assumptions and attempts to discredit the witnesses rather than objectively analyzing the evidence. The article emphasizes the importance of considering the witnesses' backgrounds and the consistency of their accounts.

Conclusion and Future Research

The issue concludes by reiterating the need for a comprehensive model that integrates all aspects of the UFO phenomenon. It calls for further research and encourages readers to share their opinions and critiques through the magazine rather than contacting witnesses directly, citing the negative impact such pressure can have on individuals.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the UFO phenomenon from multiple angles, presenting witness testimonies alongside critical analysis and theoretical frameworks. There is a clear inclination towards exploring unconventional explanations, such as parapsychology, when traditional hypotheses like the extraterrestrial one are found wanting. The editorial stance appears to favor a rigorous, yet open-minded, approach to UFO research, acknowledging the complexity and the need for interdisciplinary perspectives. The magazine also shows a commitment to protecting witnesses from undue pressure and harassment.

This issue of "Le cas Antônio Villas Boas" (The Antônio Villas Boas Case), published in March 1978, focuses on a detailed examination of a significant UFO encounter reported by Antônio Villas Boas in Brazil in 1957. The magazine presents the case with a critical eye, incorporating witness testimony, expert analysis, and a discussion of broader ufological methodologies.

The Antônio Villas Boas Case The central focus is the testimony of Antônio Villas Boas, a 23-year-old farmer from Sao Francisco de Sales, Minas Gerais, Brazil. He reported an encounter with an extraterrestrial craft and its occupants on October 16, 1957. The account includes details of being taken aboard the craft, experiencing physical examinations, and a sexual encounter with a female alien occupant. Villas Boas described the beings as wearing grey uniforms with metallic reinforcements and noted their communication through brief, high-pitched sounds.

Clinical Observations and Medical Examination Following his account, Villas Boas voluntarily underwent medical examinations by Dr. Olavo Fontes. The report details his physical state, including symptoms like fatigue, nausea, eye irritation, and the appearance of skin lesions and scars. Dr. Fontes noted that these symptoms suggested possible radiation poisoning, but definitive confirmation was hampered by the delay in examination. The report also includes a dermatological examination that identified hyperchromic lesions and scars, some with small orifices. A psychological examination indicated that Villas Boas was oriented in time and space, with normal mental processes and good memory, though a complete psychiatric opinion might require further assessment.

Ufological Commentary and Analysis The issue presents commentary from various ufologists and researchers:

• Coral Lorenzen: Expresses initial incredulity but finds the case compelling, particularly the hypothetical scenario of alien reproduction requiring human subjects. She concludes that the emotional predispositions of the witness prevent a scientific analysis of such events.
• S.B.E.D.V. (Brazilian Society for the Study of Aerial Phenomena): Poses several critical questions regarding the case, including the relationship between the blood test and the sexual encounter, the connection to previous sightings, and the potential motivations behind the alien interaction (e.g., genetic regeneration, scientific study, or establishing interplanetary relations).
• GEPA (Group for the Study of Aerial Phenomena): Through M. Fouéré, issues a cautionary note, warning against the assumption that all extraterrestrial visitors are benevolent. He emphasizes the need for caution, as the intentions and nature of these beings may remain mysterious and potentially incomprehensible.
• Dr. Fontes: In a later letter, Dr. Fontes reiterates his suspicion of radiation poisoning but acknowledges the lack of definitive proof due to the delayed examination.

Criticisms of Ufology and Michel Monnerie's Arguments A significant portion of the issue is dedicated to a critique of traditional ufological methods, largely inspired by the work of Michel Monnerie, author of "Et si les OVNI n'existaient pas?" (What if UFOs Didn't Exist?). The article argues that many ufologists:

• Are often biased: They tend to steer investigations towards pre-conceived hypotheses, influencing witness testimony through leading questions.
• Neglect psychological factors: The psychological profile of witnesses is often overlooked.
• Focus on anomalies: They exclusively highlight anomalous perceptions and data, extracting them from their normal context.
• Overemphasize witness credibility: There's a tendency to present witnesses as exceptionally observant or experienced, sometimes omitting details like the need for glasses or previous psychological issues.
• Misidentify phenomena: Many reported UFO sightings are likely misidentifications of astronomical objects (like Venus, Mars, or meteors), aircraft, or atmospheric phenomena. The article provides examples of meteor sightings that were mistaken for UFOs.
• Engage in selective reporting: Sometimes, inconvenient details that contradict a favorite hypothesis are omitted from reports.

The article suggests that when unexplained cases are filtered out, the number of truly anomalous UFO sightings becomes significantly smaller, supporting Monnerie's view that many cases can be explained through misperception, psychological factors, or misidentification.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance The issue adopts a critical and analytical stance towards ufology. It champions rigorous investigation, questioning conventional ufological approaches and emphasizing the importance of scientific methodology, psychological assessment, and the potential for misidentification. The editorial stance appears to lean towards skepticism regarding the extraterrestrial hypothesis for many reported UFO events, advocating for a more cautious and evidence-based approach. The case of Antônio Villas Boas is presented as a complex phenomenon that, while intriguing, is subject to various interpretations and methodological challenges within the field of ufology.

This issue of "Nouvelles internationales" (Volume 2, No. 10, October 1977) focuses on UFO phenomena, with a primary article detailing NASA's entry into UFO investigations. The magazine also presents an in-depth case study of a purported alien abduction in Kansas and reports on two identical UFO sightings in California separated by seven years, including scientific analysis of physical traces.

NASA's Involvement in UFO Research

The lead article, "OVNI: la N.A.S.A. entre dans l'arène," reveals that NASA is beginning to address the growing volume of UFO-related correspondence directed to the government. Frank Press, director of the Bureau of Scientific and Technological Policy, initiated investigations by reviewing files from the Air Force and CIA. He wrote to NASA Administrator Robert Frosch, highlighting the increasing number of letters and recommending the formation of a small investigative committee to assess new findings since the Condon report. Press also suggested NASA handle the 'ufological' correspondence sent to the White House. Frosch responded that questions needed resolution before a full program could begin, acknowledging that previous NASA responses were insufficient. He proposed designating a responsible official to review reports from the past decade to determine if a project was justified. This initiative was approved by Press, and correspondence was forwarded to NASA. Dr. Richard Henry is reportedly being considered to lead this effort, bringing with him associations with organizations like the Center for UFO Studies and APRO. The formation of such a committee is seen as beneficial for UFO research, especially if it remains independent of past controversies like the Condon report.

Case Study: The Kansas Abduction

The article "Un rapt au Kansas" details an alleged abduction of a young couple, Joe (19) and Carol (18), and their 4-month-old infant, Luke, on June 20, 1976. Investigator Richard Sigismonde of the Center for UFO Studies used hypnosis to elicit details of the event, which the couple had initially forgotten. The experience was described as traumatic but ultimately overcome. The couple reported seeing unusual lights while driving, followed by a 'hole' in time. Under hypnosis, they recounted seeing humanoids and being examined inside a craft. The craft was described as biconcave, about 6-12 meters high and 42-48 meters long, with brilliant white lights and rotating elements. Carol described a large craft with rotating lights at the base and ascending stairs. Joe described a biconcave craft with brilliant white lights, orange, white, and blue lights, and a window on the roof. Both described stairs. Inside, they encountered a brightly lit room with electronic equipment. Carol recalled being placed on a table and experiencing a tube-like pressure on her stomach. She also described seeing stars and realizing the craft was moving away from Earth. The humanoids were described as normal height, with sunken eyes, prominent foreheads, and wearing dark, form-fitting suits. Physical marks were found on Joe, Carol, and Luke, including abrasions, contusions, and puncture marks. The couple's memory loss was attributed to possible trauma or a shared fantasy, though Sigismonde noted the consistency of details and emotional reactions under hypnosis, suggesting the event may have genuinely occurred. They later renounced smoking and were warned against hypnotism.

Two Identical Sightings in California

"Deux rencontres identiques à sept ans d'intervalle !" reports on two UFO sightings by Mr. and Mrs. Chapin near a mine in California, separated by seven years. The first sighting occurred on October 30, 1969, when the couple observed a UFO emerge from a bush. They noted a temperature increase and found a small depression in the ground, along with a cone of sand and a metallic globe. The object was described as a bomb-shaped UFO with a flat bottom. The second sighting occurred on December 29, 1976, at nearly the same location. This time, the object was described as a demi-orange shape and approached the witnesses, causing them to fall and lose consciousness for about fifteen minutes. No physical traces were found during the second encounter. Analysis of the sand from the first sighting revealed silicium, and the metallic globe contained copper, tin, silver, and other elements, considered unusual for the site. The article notes the difficulty in definitively concluding the origin of these materials without more samples and suggests further geological investigation.

Other Articles and Features

The issue also includes a section on the "Livre noir des soucoupes volantes" and lists various other UFO-related books available for purchase through SOBEPS. Advertisements for real estate services, a bookshop specializing in UFO literature, and optical instruments are also present.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the phenomenon of UFOs and potential extraterrestrial contact. It presents detailed case studies, often relying on witness testimony and investigative techniques like hypnotic regression. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious inquiry into these phenomena, seeking to document and analyze sightings, potential abductions, and physical evidence. There is a clear interest in the scientific community's involvement, as highlighted by the focus on NASA's emerging role. The magazine also seems to advocate for rigorous investigation, distinguishing between well-documented cases and those that are less substantiated, while also acknowledging the psychological impact on witnesses. The inclusion of book reviews and advertisements for UFO-related literature reinforces the publication's dedication to the subject matter.