Inforespace - No 32 - 1977

Magazine Overview

Title: Inforespace
Issue: No. 32
Date: March 1977
Volume: 6th year
Publisher: SOBEPS asbl (Société Belge d'Etude des Phénomènes Spatiaux)
Country: Belgium
Language: French

Editorial

The editorial, written by Michel Bougard, President, reflects on the nature of UFO research, drawing a parallel with a quote from Jean Cocteau about precursors and latecomers. Bougard argues that UFO researchers are not precursors but rather observers trying to interpret a phenomenon they are subjected to. He criticizes the proliferation of UFO detection devices, suggesting that many are based on similar principles and may not be effective. He questions the practicality of automated detection stations, proposing instead the development of optical networks to capture spectral data of UFOs, a technique championed by Claude Poher. Bougard also highlights the importance of re-examining older, well-documented cases, citing the San José de Valderas and Aluche photos, and the UMMO affair as examples of potentially overlooked research avenues. He announces that the magazine will publish the complete report on the Villas Boas case, emphasizing its detailed content beyond the sensational aspects. The editorial also introduces a new series on early 20th-century UFO phenomena and discusses the historical evolution of UFO sightings, noting the recurring pattern of advanced technology appearing before its time. Finally, it touches upon collaborations with other groups like 'Lumières Dans La Nuit' and expresses regret over the refusal of the French group GEPA to allow reproduction of their texts. The editorial concludes by stating that Belgian ufological news is experiencing a slight resurgence, but SOBEPS prioritizes rigorous investigation over immediate reporting of recent, unverified sightings.

Table of Contents

The issue features a diverse range of articles:

• Editorial (Page 2)
• Les pièces du puzzle (The pieces of the puzzle) (Page 4)
• Aluche, San Jose de Valderas, UMMO: une supercherie de taille ! (Aluche, San Jose de Valderas, UMMO: a major hoax!) (Page 9)
• Paralysie, l'arbre qui cachait la forêt (1) (Paralysis, the tree that hid the forest (1)) (Page 13)
• Fusées gigognes au XVIIe siècle: est-ce un mystère ? (Nested rockets in the 17th century: is it a mystery?) (Page 16)
• Nos enquêtes (Our investigations) (Page 19)
• Le dossier photo d'inforespace (The inforespace photo file) (Page 24)
• L'affaire des « boules » de l'Aveyron (The 'balls' of Aveyron affair) (Page 29)
• Les OVNI et les archétypes (UFOs and archetypes) (Page 38)
• OVNI et bouleversements culturels (UFOs and cultural upheavals) (Page 40)
• Nouvelles internationales (International news) (Page 41)
• Chronique des OVNI (UFO Chronicle) (Page 44)
• On nous écrit ... (Letters to the editor) (Page 47)

Article Summaries

Les pièces du puzzle (Pages 4-8)

This section, authored by Maurice Viton and an unnamed collaborator, delves into theories explaining UFO behavior, focusing on Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) and hydrodynamic analogy experiments. They propose that UFOs might be MHD aerodynes. The article explains how disturbances on the surface of a liquid can mimic shock waves, a concept used in fluid mechanics labs. They describe experiments using a fluid tank with electrodes to create currents and magnetic fields, generating forces (Laplace forces) that influence fluid flow, analogous to how an MHD aerodyne might operate. The goal is to understand how such a craft could manipulate its environment, potentially eliminating compressibility effects in supersonic flows. The authors also discuss the potential for MHD to control plasma, referencing research from Laurence Livermore Laboratory and Princeton on Tokamak devices for fusion, suggesting that MHD principles could be applied to create propulsion systems.

Aluche, San Jose de Valderas, UMMO: une supercherie de taille ! (Pages 9-12)

This article, by Claude Poher, critically examines the UFO cases from San José de Valderas and Aluche in Spain, as well as the UMMO affair, arguing they were elaborate hoaxes. Poher suggests that these cases, despite their initial impact and widespread dissemination since 1967, lack genuine evidence and were likely fabricated. The article implies that the detailed analysis of these cases is crucial for understanding how such deceptions can occur and persist.

Paralysie, l'arbre qui cachait la forêt (1) (Pages 13-15)

This is the first part of an article exploring the phenomenon of paralysis, possibly in the context of UFO encounters or sleep paralysis, suggesting it might be a key element in understanding a larger phenomenon. The title implies a focus on a specific aspect that has obscured a broader understanding.

Fusées gigognes au XVIIe siècle: est-ce un mystère ? (Pages 16-18)

This article investigates reports of 'nested rockets' observed in the 17th century. It questions whether these sightings represent a genuine mystery or a misinterpretation of known phenomena from that era. The investigation likely aims to provide a rational explanation or highlight the puzzling nature of these historical observations.

Nos enquêtes (Pages 19-23)

This section presents the results of investigations conducted by the magazine's team into various UFO cases. It likely details the methodology, evidence gathered, and conclusions drawn from specific sightings or encounters.

Le dossier photo d'inforespace (Pages 24-28)

This photo file section likely showcases and analyzes photographic evidence related to UFO sightings, potentially including cases from Belgium and Brazil, as mentioned in the back issue description.

L'affaire des « boules » de l'Aveyron (Pages 29-37)

This article begins the detailed reporting on the 'balls of Aveyron' case, described as an impressive series of astonishing facts investigated by the 'Lumières Dans La Nuit' team. It suggests that this case, like the Villas Boas report, contains significant details not widely known.

Les OVNI et les archétypes (Pages 38-39)

This article explores the connection between UFO sightings and psychological archetypes, suggesting that the way UFOs are perceived or reported might be influenced by universal symbolic patterns.

OVNI et bouleversements culturels (Pages 40-40)

This piece examines the impact of UFO phenomena on cultural shifts and societal perceptions, likely discussing how sightings and beliefs about UFOs have influenced art, literature, and popular culture.

Nouvelles internationales (Pages 41-43)

This section provides updates on UFO-related news and events from around the world, offering a broader perspective on the phenomenon.

Chronique des OVNI (Pages 44-46)

This is a recurring section that likely provides a summary or overview of recent UFO activity and related developments, with this installment focusing on early 20th-century sightings.

On nous écrit ... (Page 47)

This section contains letters from readers, offering their opinions, observations, and contributions to the magazine's discussions.

Back Issues and Subscriptions (Page 2)

The magazine details the availability of its back issues from 1972 to 1977 (issues 1 to 36). Subscription rates for ordinary and student memberships are listed for Belgium, France, and other countries for the years 1972-1977. Information is provided on how to make payments via bank transfers or postal money orders, specifying that cheques are not accepted for France and Canada. A 'support subscription' option is also available.

SOBEPS and its Mission

The Société Belge d'Etude des Phénomènes Spatiaux (SOBEPS) is presented as a non-profit association dedicated to the rational and objective study of spatial phenomena. It aims to disseminate information without prejudice, through its bimonthly review and conferences. The organization actively seeks collaboration from its readers, encouraging them to share any relevant information about observed phenomena. The publication of reader submissions is subject to available space and the author's responsibility.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of Inforespace strongly emphasizes a rigorous, scientific approach to ufology. The editorial stance is clear: prioritize in-depth investigation, critical analysis of cases (including potential hoaxes), and the study of historical sightings. There is a notable skepticism towards unverified recent reports and a preference for well-documented, even older, cases. The magazine also explores theoretical aspects, such as MHD propulsion, and the psychological or cultural dimensions of UFO phenomena. The call for reader collaboration and the detailed presentation of research, like the hydrodynamic analogy experiments, underscore a commitment to advancing the field through methodical inquiry rather than sensationalism.

This issue of *Phénomènes Spatiaux*, Volume 12, Issue 26, dated December 1969, is primarily dedicated to debunking significant UFO cases and exploring the phenomenon of UFO-related paralysis. The cover headline boldly declares the Aluche and San Jose de Valderas observations, along with the UMMO affair, to be a "supercherie de taille" (a large hoax).

The Aluche, San Jose de Valderas, and UMMO Affair: A Major Hoax

Claude Poher, a doctor-engineer and head of the 'Scientific Systems and Projects' division at CNES, presents his research on photographic documents related to the Aluche and San Jose de Valderas observations in Spain, as well as the UMMO affair. The UMMO affair involved scientific data allegedly provided by 'extraterrestrials' to a select few. Poher, with the assistance of official services and scientists, conducted a detailed analysis between 1970 and 1972. He found that approximately 50% of the UMMO documents were accurate, with the rest being false. The scientific knowledge required to create these documents was estimated to be at the level of early undergraduate science studies. Poher concluded that it was unlikely a single person created the entire affair, noting the documents were typed on a Spanish typewriter by individuals with Spanish cultural backgrounds.

His investigation into the San Jose de Valderas photographs, using advanced image processing techniques at CNES, revealed arguments both for and against the authenticity of the clichés. Arguments for authenticity included the lighting of the landscape and object, the time elapsed between shots, and the object's size and luminosity being consistent with atmospheric diffusion and potential MHD aerodynamic models. However, Poher found significant arguments for a hoax. These included the object's inconsistent centering in the frame, incompatible with freehand photography, and the photographic parameters suggesting unusual aiming techniques. He also noted that the landscape and object in the photos attributed to a second photographer, Antonio Pardo, were too perfectly juxtaposed. Detailed photometric comparisons suggested the object was a translucent maquette, possibly a plastic plate with a drawn sign. The 'cupola' luminosity was consistent with a polished, translucent material. The energy emission values were incompatible with an opaque object emitting light through ionization or excitation of ambient air.

Poher's conclusion is that the San Jose de Valderas clichés are a hoax, created using a translucent plastic maquette with a drawn sign, suspended by a fine thread. He even replicated the effect for 7.60 FF. The film used was VALCA (400 ASA), and the camera settings were likely F/11 at 1/100th of a second.

The consequences of this finding extend beyond the photographic hoax, suggesting that a staged event was prepared to involve many honest witnesses. Poher posits that a sophisticated operation was needed, potentially beyond the scope of a private group, and questions the motivations behind such a large-scale deception. He notes the omnipresence of a 'M. JORDAN' in the investigation narrative. Poher believes that Farriols and Ribera were themselves deceived by a clever mystifier. He also links the UMMO affair's collapse to this finding, expressing concern that the hoax might have been part of a more serious, less peaceful game of large-scale disinformation or cult creation.

Jean-Pierre Petit on MHD Aerodyne Theory

In a separate piece, Jean-Pierre Petit addresses a critique from the group OURANOS, published by Pierre Delval, who accused Petit of plagiarizing an article by Yvan Bozzonetti. Petit clarifies that while Bozzonetti's work showed intuition about MHD phenomena, it lacked scientific coherence. Petit defends his own MHD aerodyne theory, stating that while it may not explain all UFO observations (like 90-degree turns at Mach 10 or instant disappearances), it represents a step forward. He acknowledges the limitations of the MHD formula and the problem of interstellar travel.

Paralysis: The Tree Hiding the Forest (Part 1)

Jean-Luc Jorion presents a study on UFO-related paralysis, building on previous work by Francis Windey and Guy Vanackeren. Jorion's research, based on 69 cases, aims to identify a structure within the paralysis phenomenon that could be a remarkable proof of UFO existence. He analyzes the relationship between the distance of the encounter and the occurrence of paralysis.

Jorion identifies two distinct types of paralysis:

1. Voluntary Paralysis: This is described as an offensive action by humanoids or a defensive action by the witness. It is often associated with a portable weapon emitting a focused ray, causing immediate paralysis.
2. Automatic Paralysis: This is attributed to a force field around the craft, with effects that are diversified and progressive. It is often accompanied by electromagnetic phenomena such as vehicle and watch stoppages, and the extinction of lights and radios.

Jorion's analysis of the distance distribution for these two types of paralysis, presented in Graphiques 1-4, shows distinct patterns. For voluntary paralysis (Graphique 3), there's an "official" curve ending at 38 meters, suggesting a danger threshold below which witnesses are at risk of being paralyzed by a weapon. A single case at 80 meters is noted as an exceptional response to an unforeseen event. For automatic paralysis (Graphique 4), the curve shows two peaks at 30 and 150 meters, with a trough at 90 meters, suggesting variations dependent on external circumstances like landing location or distance to witnesses.

Jorion concludes that the differing distance distributions provide evidence for the existence of these two distinct types of paralysis, establishing a piece of the phenomenon's internal structure. He states that this is a step towards non-testimonial proof of UFO existence and promises further analysis in a subsequent article.

The editorial note from *Phénomènes Spatiaux* cautions that Jorion's study, based on a small number of cases, may be subject to significant error and suggests that more cases are needed to confirm his findings.

Historical Accounts of Rocket-like Objects

This section explores historical accounts of objects resembling rockets. Charles Le Brun's 17th-century tapestry designs for "The Four Elements" include a medallion on "The Fire" element depicting a multi-stage rocket. This has led some to speculate about early UFO sightings. The article also references the writings of Cyrano de Bergerac (1619-1655), particularly his work "L'Autre Monde." In one passage, Cyrano describes a machine propelled by successive stages of gunpowder, which Aimé Michel notes as a possible prefiguration of space capsule launches. However, the article points out that the principle of stacked rockets was known to artificers as early as 1625, with the Polish Siemienowicz imagining 'gigogne' (nested) rockets for fireworks.

Editorial Stance and Recurring Themes

The magazine consistently adopts a critical and analytical approach to UFO phenomena. It prioritizes scientific investigation, evidence-based reasoning, and the debunking of hoaxes. The articles in this issue highlight the importance of rigorous analysis, whether through photographic interpretation, statistical study of witness accounts, or historical research. The magazine appears to be a platform for researchers like Claude Poher and Jean-Luc Jorion to present their findings, while also offering editorial commentary and context, as seen in the cautionary note regarding Jorion's paralysis study. The recurring themes include the possibility of hoaxes and misinterpretations in UFO reports, the scientific study of unexplained phenomena, and the exploration of historical precedents for modern UFO sightings. The magazine also emphasizes the need for collaboration and resources within the ufological community, as indicated by the appeal for help with office relocation and document transport.

Title: Nos enquêtes
Issue: 19
Date: Not specified, but articles refer to events in 1952, 1968, and 1975.
Publisher: Not specified.
Country: France
Language: French
Document Type: Magazine Issue

This issue of 'Nos enquêtes' presents a collection of UFO/UAP investigations and related historical context. It features detailed accounts of sightings, photographic analysis, and discussions of potential explanations, drawing from events across Europe and North America.

Article 1: Une insolite partie de pêche (An Unusual Fishing Trip)

This article details a sighting that occurred in Epinois, Belgium, in June 1968. The witness, a 61-year-old fisherman named M. J.R., was fishing at the Etang de la Ferme du Moulin around 3 AM. He observed three powerful, rectilinear light beams emanating from the northeast at a 55° azimuth and 60° elevation. These beams were described as transparent cylinders of varying lengths, arranged in parallel. Their color was compared to white-yellow anti-aircraft searchlights, and the light did not diffuse, stopping as if hitting an invisible wall. The beams would intermittently turn off and on, not always in synchronization, and would reappear in slightly different positions. The phenomenon seemed to move laterally. After about half an hour, the witness noticed a similar phenomenon to the southwest, consisting of two beams. The beams never joined, and their parallelism remained constant. The witness noted that the length of the beams varied, and despite their power, they did not illuminate the sky. The appearance and disappearance were not cyclical. The observation lasted about an hour, and no sound was heard. The witness also recalled seeing a formation of several stationary discs in the sky at Mons in 1945.

The technical details of the observation are: Date: June 1968, around 3 AM; Location: Epinois (Hainaut), Belgium; Observation: luminous beams; Number of witnesses: 1 (pensioner, 61 years old); Secondary effects: none.

Article 2: Un OVNI posé au sol à Péruwelz (A UFO on the Ground in Péruwelz)

This report details an observation that occurred in Péruwelz, Belgium, likely in the last week of July 1975, during a heatwave. The witness, identified as Monsieur G.L., a 45-year-old man, described an object he initially mistook for a cement bag on the side of a road about 80 meters away. The object was oblong, about the size of a Renault 4L, and rested half on the asphalt and half on the roadside grass. As he approached, the object suddenly lifted off the ground without any apparent wind, rising obliquely at an angle of about ten degrees. The witness then realized it was not a cement bag. He described the object as having a regular shape, like a plate or an elongated ellipsoid topped with a low dome. The base was estimated to be 2.5 to 3 meters in diameter, and the dome 1 to 1.5 meters high, with a flat top. The color was a uniform sandy or light ochre. The object then moved to the left side of the road, about 2 to 3 meters above the ground, and began a gliding movement with a helical twist, without tilting, increasing its speed. It passed under an overhead telephone line and reached an altitude of 6 to 7 meters. Another similar twisting movement occurred, bringing the object to 30 meters above a cornfield. A third maneuver raised it to 60 or 70 meters, where it hovered. The object was positioned almost perpendicularly to the road, about 100 meters away. The witness noted that the object appeared hollow, like a canoe, with a dark zone on its underside. He also observed what seemed to be rotors at the two ends of the base, rotating slowly and appearing integrated into the base, suggesting they were the propulsion system. The object oscillated around its main axis, sometimes losing altitude and then regaining it in a disorganized manner, reminiscent of bird movements. Suddenly, it accelerated rapidly towards the southwest, disappearing from view within moments. The entire observation lasted about a minute and occurred in complete silence. The object's surface was described as matte, non-metallic, and non-reflective, with no visible light source or emissions. The witness reported no secondary effects other than understandable astonishment. This was the witness's first and only reported UFO observation. The incident occurred on a weekday, likely in late July 1975.

In an interview conducted on August 7, 1976, Monsieur G.L. stated he returned home immediately after the sighting, feeling disoriented. He did not find any traces the next day, and the grass was not even disturbed. He admitted he was afraid to ask nearby residents if they had seen anything, fearing ridicule. He eventually spoke to a member of an ornithological society, who then connected him with Monsieur Gobert, who in turn brought him to the attention of the investigators. Monsieur G.L. denied ever witnessing any other unusual events.

When asked what he thought he saw, he stated he initially thought it was a discarded cement bag, but its subsequent levitation and movement without wind were inexplicable. He could not explain why no cars passed on the road during the sixty seconds of the observation, despite some traffic. He confirmed there were no visible antennas or landing gear, and the object's color was uniformly yellow-ochre. He described the object as made of a single piece, hollow inside, with a clear silhouette against the blue sky. He acknowledged that his description might seem absurd but insisted it was what he saw. The investigators noted that yellow-ochre UFOs are rare, and the mention of 'rotor-propellers' is unusual, recalling the 'airships' of 1897. They found it strange that such an object could appear, hover near a level crossing, and depart without anyone else noticing. They questioned whether the observation was invented or a waking dream, but noted the witness's detailed description aligned with other reported cases. They pondered the witness's motivation for keeping silent for so long and the seemingly absurd details of the sighting.

The technical details of this observation are: Date: end of July 1975; Location: Péruwelz (Hainaut), Belgium; Object: ellipsoid topped with a flat dome; Number of witnesses: 1; Credibility index: 2; Strangeness index: 3; Classification: RR1.

Article 3: Le dossier photo d'inforespace: Lac Chauvet, France, 18 juillet 1952 (The Photo File of Inforespace: Lac Chauvet, France, July 18, 1952)

This section presents an analysis of four photographs taken by André Frégnale at Lac Chauvet in the Puy-de-Dôme department of France on July 18, 1952. Lac Chauvet is situated in the crater of an ancient volcano. Frégnale, an engineer, was photographing the landscape when, around 6 PM, he observed a round object progressing at a constant speed, similar to a small airplane at 1000 meters altitude. The object's trajectory was horizontal and rectilinear, moving from west to east (right to left in the photos). The four photos were taken sequentially with an interval of about eight seconds between each, using an Ikonta Zeiss camera with a 45mm lens and a Wratten n° 15 filter, at a shutter speed of 1/250 s on Panatomic-X black and white film. No sound was heard, and the object showed no signs of instability or deviation from its path. The observation was continued with binoculars, and the object suddenly disappeared. Aimé Michel, writing in 1954, noted that Frégnale did not believe in flying saucers and suggested a natural phenomenon, possibly cosmic dust agglomerations. However, in a 1975 letter, Frégnale offered a simpler explanation: the object disappeared from his field of vision as it moved towards the horizon.

Pierre Guérin, a Research Master at the C.N.R.S., examined the clichés and commented that the object's contours were sharp, with a luminous border on the upper surface, possibly from sunlight reflecting off a metallic surface. Enlargements revealed a dark spot eccentrically located below the object. Guérin noted that the object's horizontal trajectory, causing it to descend towards the horizon as it moved away, and the consistent orientation of the dark spot opposite the direction of movement, suggested the object was tilting upwards. He concluded that this excluded the possibility of a hoax and considered the series of images authentic. He stated that no known aircraft resembled the object, which matched descriptions of 'flying saucers'. Importantly, at the time of the observation, the 'flying saucer psychosis' had not yet reached France, and Frégnale, as an engineer, had not previously been interested in UFOs.

The analysis further notes that the object's elliptical shape became more elongated as it moved away, and the sunlit upper edge became more apparent with each successive photo. The lighting on the trees in the background also confirmed the direction of light. The position of the foliage in the first photo was identical to the second, suggesting the photographer moved a few steps forward between shots. The relative size of the object remained consistent across the photos. The overall evidence, according to the article, strongly supports the authenticity of the photos, even more so than the witness's own reservations.

Frégnale's letter from October 30, 1975, is quoted: "Many enthusiastic ufologists have claimed to see in these documents a host of advantageous proofs (3), starting with the proof that these photos are not faked (impossible to prove, as anything can be faked in a photo). For my part, I have the frankness to admit that my photos, whatever their interest, prove nothing. (...) Although I do not deal with ufology, it is evident that I have reflected on the various hypotheses that could apply to the object I photographed."

Frégnale then lists four hypotheses:
1. Flying model? Possible, as France in 1952 was experiencing a collective 'saucer psychosis,' with some people attempting to build flying models.
2. Extraterrestrial craft? Perhaps, but it would have to come from a planet belonging to another star, as no other planet in our solar system is known to harbor evolved life.
3. Future terrestrial craft visiting the past? Logically improbable, as an object would cease to exist if it traveled to a time before its fabrication.
4. Unknown cosmic phenomenon? Possible.

The article contextualizes these photos within a period of intense UFO activity, particularly in the United States during July 1952. It mentions other sightings and photographic evidence from that month, including those by Shell Alpert in Salem, Massachusetts, and George Stock in Passaic, New Jersey, highlighting the 'hot summer of ufology.'

Service Librairie (Bookstore Service)

This section announces a new book by Henry Durrant titled "Premières enquêtes sur les humanoïdes extraterrestres" (First investigations into extraterrestrial humanoids), published by Editions Robert Laffont in the collection 'Les énigmes de l'univers'. The book is presented as a follow-up to Durrant's previous works, 'Le livre noir des soucoupes volantes' and 'Le dossier des OVNI,' offering an in-depth study of different types of humanoids. It is divided into three parts: Facts, Analyses, and Hypotheses, and contains over 300 pages. The price is 335 FB.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine 'Nos enquêtes' focuses on detailed, investigative reporting of UFO/UAP sightings and related phenomena. The editorial stance appears to be one of open-mindedness and thorough analysis, presenting witness testimonies, photographic evidence, and expert opinions. While acknowledging the possibility of hoaxes or misidentifications, the publication seems to lean towards exploring the unexplained aspects of these events, particularly when presented with credible evidence and detailed accounts, as seen in the analysis of the Lac Chauvet photographs and the cautious approach to the Péruwelz sighting. The magazine also engages with historical UFO cases and broader ufological contexts, such as the 'flying saucer psychosis' of the 1950s.

This issue of "Les grands cas mondiaux" focuses on "L'affaire des 'boules' de l'Aveyron" (The Case of the 'Spheres' of Aveyron), presenting a detailed account of a significant UFO sighting. The magazine's objective is to inform researchers and the general public about important cases that may not have received widespread attention. The article is based on reports published in the French journal "Lumières Dans La Nuit" and the book "Mystérieuses Soucoupes Volantes".

The Aveyron 'Boules' Case

The case originated from a letter received in November 1969, detailing extraordinary events. An initial investigation by Dr. Dupin de la Guérivière revealed the core narrative to be accurate but lacking in detail. Following advice from A. Michel, who deemed the case highly important, a joint investigation was conducted by multiple researchers to ensure a comprehensive and unbiased report. This investigation involved on-site observations, interviews recorded over 1 hour and 45 minutes, and the collection of documents.

The events took place in a rural setting in Aveyron, France, at a modest farm. The primary witnesses were a family, including the grandmother (aïeule), the father (gendre), and later, the son (fils).

The Grandmother's Testimony (June 15, 1966)

The grandmother, aged 76, was the first to report seeing unusual lights around 9:30 PM. She described them as "fires" that did not illuminate but were intensely bright. Initially, she saw multiple lights, described as being "as big as three men's heads." These lights were initially distant (1.2 km) and then approached, moving towards a hill near the village of X, and later towards Y (800m away). The lights descended into a nearby stream valley, covering a distance of 600 meters. The grandmother expressed fear, worried about fire and the potential danger to the farm.

The Father's Testimony (June 15, 1966)

The father, the family's head of household, recounted his experience. He was called by his mother and initially saw nothing. After a few minutes, he saw a "ball" about 15 meters from the house. It remained motionless for a few minutes before disappearing instantly, like a switch being turned off. The lights reappeared further away, at distances of 1 km and 500 m. The reappearance was almost instantaneous, occurring within seconds. He described the balls as round, more bulbous at the top than the bottom, with the base being flatter. He observed six such balls at one point, rotating in a field. He estimated their distance from each other to be around 50 meters, though his son later suggested 10 meters.

The 'Obus' Encounter

The father also described seeing a larger object, which he called the "obus" (shell or projectile). He initially mistook it for a burning tree. This object was luminous but had no visible flame or smoke. He later saw the six "boules" moving in line, one behind the other, as if following the "obus." The "boules" remained luminous as they moved. He noted the complete absence of sound, unlike a tractor. He described the movement of the "boules" as being at a walking pace, like a tractor in first gear.

The 'Obus' and the 'Boules' Interaction

The father recounted that the "boules" eventually joined the "obus." He went to bed, feeling that the situation had resolved. He later described the "obus" as being white and luminous, similar in color to the "boules." He also noted that the "obus" seemed to have three branches on each side, and the "boules" would join it, with one ball on each branch, making a total of six "boules" around the "obus." A light, described as a "phare" (headlight), was visible at the top of the "obus," illuminating the room where the son was.

The Dogs' Reaction

In another sequence, the story of the family's dogs is recounted. Two dogs, sleeping outside near the stables, reacted to the "tapage" (commotion) in the sky. When the father shouted "A qui pique lou!" (a local expression, possibly meaning 'who is going to chase?'), the dogs pursued the "boules" up to the edge of the vineyard. They did not approach too closely (about 1 to 1.5 meters) and stopped when the objects disappeared. The dogs did not seem frightened and obeyed their master's voice, suggesting they perceived nothing abnormal.

The 'Obus' and the Father's Pursuit

The father, intrigued, decided to investigate the "obus" further. He attempted to circle the house to surprise the object from behind. However, the "obus" seemed to anticipate his move, blocking his path twice. The father felt a sense of being watched and that the object understood his intentions. He described the "obus" as being about 1.50 meters in diameter and white and luminous, but it did not illuminate the ground. He felt no heat. He eventually gave up the attempt and returned to the house, with the "obus" following him.

The Son's Perspective

The son, initially skeptical, became more involved. He saw the "obus" and the "boules" later. He described the "obus" as having a green-blue light and being close to the ground in a field. He and his father observed the "obus" together again the following evening. He also noted that the "boules" were not illuminated by the "obus"'s light. He mentioned that the "obus" would sometimes illuminate his room intensely, like daylight.

Psychological Interpretations (C.G. Jung)

The article concludes by discussing psychological interpretations of UFO phenomena, referencing the work of Carl Jung. Jung viewed UFOs as archetypes of our society, generated by the collective unconscious. He suggested that the recurring symbols, such as circular shapes, represent a search for wholeness and compensation in modern society, where individuals feel disconnected from the divine and their own personalities. The "obus" and "boules" are presented as potential manifestations of this collective psychological need.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine's stance is to present documented cases of potential UFO phenomena to a wide audience, encouraging further study and understanding. The editorial emphasizes the importance of detailed investigation and witness testimony, while also acknowledging the role of psychological interpretation in understanding such events. The recurring theme is the baffling nature of these unexplained aerial phenomena and their potential impact on human perception and society.

This issue of "OVNI et bouleversements culturels" (UFOs and Cultural Upheavals), published in November 1976, explores the multifaceted impact of UFO phenomena on human psychology, culture, and history. It presents a blend of theoretical analysis, historical accounts, and contemporary reports, aiming to foster a deeper understanding of the subject.

Psychological and Cultural Implications of UFOs

The lead article, by Guy Vanackeren and Francis Windey, delves into the psychological underpinnings of UFO sightings. It posits that these sightings are not merely external events but can be interpreted as reflections of the human psyche's quest for equilibrium, particularly in the face of a technologically driven society that may have disturbed humanity's inner balance. The authors draw parallels with Jungian concepts of the collective unconscious and archetypal symbols, suggesting that the circle, a recurring symbol, represents the union of complementary forces like the conscious and unconscious. They argue that the fear and unease associated with UFOs stem from a potential challenge to humanity's self-perceived superiority and its place in the universe, a concept deeply ingrained in Western culture.

Raymond Colle, in his contribution, further elaborates on the cultural and educational implications. He suggests that the acceptance of UFO reality could trigger a significant cultural revolution, necessitating a re-evaluation of humanity's position in the cosmos, moving away from a Ptolemaic-like anthropocentric view towards a more Copernican understanding. He emphasizes the need for a progressive educational approach to help humanity adapt to this new perspective.

Historical UFO Cases

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to chronicling historical UFO sightings, tracing the phenomenon back to the early 20th century. This section, compiled by Alain Stercq, aims to provide a chronological overview of early observations, acknowledging that it is not a rigorous archival work but rather an effort to compile and present past observations coherently.

• 1900, Spain: The mayor of Caso, Felipe Alvarez, witnessed a bright light moving on a mountain path, an event that became known as the "light of Beneros."
• Circa 1900, France: A woman in Loire-Atlantique reported being followed by a silent, large, fiery ball for three kilometers.
• September 1901, France: M. Benette observed a star-like object that rapidly changed brightness, diminishing and then returning to its original brilliance.
• May 1, 1902, France: Near Rochefort, Mlle Marguerite des Varennes saw a vibrant red fireball with a dark, conical tail.
• June 10, 1902, United Kingdom: Colonel Markwick reported a sighting of numerous strongly colored objects resembling small fireballs or balloons over South Devon.
• September 11, 1902, France: M. L. de Felice observed an unusual electrical phenomenon in Lille, where a cloud intermittently emitted an intense red glow.
• October 28, 1902, Atlantic Ocean: The crew of the ship "Fort Salisbury" sighted a large, solid object moving underwater in the Gulf of Guinea, estimated to be 180 meters long and 30 meters wide.
• 1904, USA: In Rolling Prairie, Indiana, Tom Darby and his family observed two bluish-white objects that approached each other and disappeared.

These historical accounts highlight the diverse forms and behaviors attributed to UFOs even in the early days of modern UFO reporting.

International News: UFO Incidents

Spain: Close Encounter

An incident in Seville province on January 27-28, 1976, involved Miguel Fernandez Carrasco, who reported a UFO landing and a close encounter with two tall, human-like beings. The beings wore suits resembling those of frogmen and emitted light beams from their belts. The witness lost consciousness and experienced partial memory loss. Medical examinations confirmed his mental stability.

Portugal: Airliner Encounters

On July 30, 1976, three commercial airliners (a Tristar and two 727s) reported multiple UFO sightings south of Lisbon. The crews described bright lights and large, unusual objects, including cigar-shaped and rectangular forms. Radar contacts were also made, with one report detailing an echo significantly larger than that of a typical aircraft, suggesting a high-speed maneuver.

Technical and Scientific Discussions

UFO Detection

A section invites readers to contribute ideas and practical results for the detection of UFOs using electronic or other systems, encouraging collaboration among members of the SOBEPS society.

Hypoxia and Aviation

An extended discussion addresses the case of a pilot who reported UFOs and was diagnosed with hypoglycemia and hypoxia. The article argues against the initial diagnosis, particularly the idea of acclimatization to altitude, and focuses on the effects of chronic hypoxia. It explains how reduced oxygen pressure at high altitudes can impair mental and sensory functions, leading to euphoria, depression, and hallucinations. The authors contend that the pilot's symptoms were consistent with hypoxia, and that his ability to recover and communicate was due to the descent, not a rapid acclimatization.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the intersection of UFO phenomena with psychology, culture, and history. The editorial stance appears to be open-minded, presenting various cases and theories without definitively endorsing any single explanation, while maintaining a critical perspective. There is a clear emphasis on the need for objective research and the acknowledgment of errors in the field of ufology. The recurring theme is that UFOs challenge established paradigms, not just in science but also in our understanding of human consciousness and our place in the universe. The publication encourages reader participation and aims to contribute to a broader understanding of these persistent mysteries.

This document is a catalog from the SOBEPS (Service Librairie de la SOBEPS) listing numerous books available for purchase. It functions as a specialized bookstore catalog for UFO and related phenomena literature. The primary focus is on French-language books, but it also mentions English books available from Britt's Bookshop.

Available Books and Authors

The catalog details a wide array of books on UFOs and extraterrestrial phenomena, categorized by author and subject. Each entry includes the book title, author(s), publisher, a brief description of its content, and its price in French Francs (FB).

Key Titles and Authors Mentioned:

• "DES SOUCOUPES VOLANTES AUX OVNI" by Michel Bougard (SOBEPS): A collective work aiming to summarize UFO research.
• "A IDENTIFIER ET LE CAS ADAMSKI" by Jean-Gérard Dohmen (Travox): The first Belgian book in French on UFOs, featuring observations in Belgium.
• "LA NOUVELLE VAGUE DES SOUCOUPES VOLANTES" by Jean-Claude Bourret (France-Empire): Extracts from a France-Inter radio show, including interviews and cases.
• "LE NOUVEAU DEFI DES OVNI" by Jean-Claude Bourret (France-Empire): Features French Gendarmerie files, unpublished investigations, and research by Jean-Pierre Petit on magnetohydrodynamic propulsion.
• "MYSTERIEUSES SOUCOUPES VOLANTES" by Fernand Lagarde and "Lumières dans la Nuit" (Albatros): A collective work with reflections from researchers like Aimé Michel and Jacques Vallée.
• "LES SOUCOUPES VOLANTES VIENNENT D'UN AUTRE MONDE" and "BLACK-OUT SUR LES SOUCOUPES VOLANTES" by Jimmy Guieu (Omnium Littéraire): Two French ufology classics.
• "LE LIVRE NOIR DES SOUCOUPES VOLANTES" by Henry Durrant (Laffont): A chronological history of human reactions to the UFO phenomenon.
• "LES DOSSIERS DES OVNI" by Henry Durrant (Laffont): A methodical analysis of invariants in UFO observations.
• "SOUCOUPES VOLANTES, 20 ANS D'ENQUETES" by Charles Garreau (Mame): A review of serious UFO research in France by a pioneer.
• "FACE AUX EXTRATERRESTRES" by Charles Garreau and Raymond Lavier (J-P. Delarge): Includes a dossier of 200 landing testimonies in France.
• "DES SIGNES DANS LE CIEL" by Paul Misraki (Mame): Explores the relationship between UFOs and religious phenomena.
• "CHRONIQUES DES APPARITIONS EXTRATERRESTRES" by Jacques Vallée (Denoël): Presents the author's views on ufology with a catalog of 900 landing cases.
• "LE COLLEGE INVISIBLE" by Jacques Vallée (Albin Michel): Attempts to link UFOs with parapsychological phenomena.
• "DISPARITIONS MYSTERIEUSES" by Patrice Gaston (Laffont): Documents mysterious disappearances of people without a trace.
• "LE DOSSIER DES SOUCOUPES VOLANTES, CEUX VENUS D'AILLEURS" and "OVNI DIMENSION AUTRE" by Jacques Lob and Robert Gigi (Dargaud): A three-volume objective study presented as comic books.
• "LES OBJETS VOLANTS NON IDENTIFIES: MYTHE OU REALITE ?" by Dr. J. Allen Hynek (Belfond): Explains the importance of serious UFO study, revealing unpublished documents.
• "SOUCOUPES VOLANTES, AFFAIRE SERIEUSE" by Frank Edwards (Laffont): An American work addressing official attitudes and describing observations.
• "LES ETRANGERS DE L'ESPACE" by Major Donald E. Keyhoe (France-Empire): The French translation of "Aliens From Space," detailing UFO controversies in the US.
• "LES OVNI EN U.R.S.S. ET DANS LES PAYS DE L'EST" by Julien Weverbergh and lon Hobana (Robert Laffont): A dossier on UFO observations from Eastern Bloc countries.
• "LE LIVRE DES DAMNES" by Charles Fort (Losfeld): A collection of curious phenomena and unexplained facts.

Ordering and Payment Information

Orders can be placed by sending the payment to the SOBEPS postal check account (C.C.P. n° 000-316209-86) or the bank account (n° 210-0222255-80) of Société Générale de Banque. For France and Canada, only international postal money orders are accepted. Cheques are not accepted.

Related Advertisements

Britt's Bookshop: Located in Brussels, this shop offers English books on UFOs and enigma subjects.

"KADATH" Magazine: A review that served as the basis for the anthology "Chroniques des civilisations disparues." It is published five times a year and focuses on archaeological enigmas. Subscription details are provided.

Jumelles, Spotting-Scopes, Lunettes Astronomiques, Microscopes, Réparations, Etc. (VIKING): An advertisement for an optical instruments workshop and store in Brussels, run by Pierre Slotte.

"Le guide de l'enquêteur" (The Investigator's Guide): This book, available for 95 FB from SOBEPS, is presented as an essential tool for investigators. It contains questions for witnesses, techniques for analyzing UFO sightings, and astronomical data. Payment details for this book are also provided.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The catalog strongly promotes the serious study of UFO phenomena, featuring a wide range of research, case files, and theoretical works. The inclusion of books by prominent ufologists like Jacques Vallée, J. Allen Hynek, and Donald E. Keyhoe, as well as historical accounts and analyses, indicates a commitment to providing comprehensive resources for those interested in the subject. The emphasis on "serious research" and "investigations" suggests an editorial stance that encourages a methodical and evidence-based approach to understanding UFOs, while also acknowledging the more speculative and mysterious aspects of the phenomenon.