Inforespace - No 107 - 2003

Magazine Overview

Title: Inforespace
Issue: 107
Volume: 32nd year
Date: December 2003
Publisher: SOBEPS (Société Belge d'Etude des Phénomènes Spatiaux)
Country: Belgium
Language: French

This issue of Inforespace, a publication dedicated to ufology and space phenomena, focuses on two significant topics: a comprehensive dossier on the "Belgian UFO wave" and an in-depth analysis of a unique case involving an "incandescent stone" that fell from the sky.

Editorial

The editorial by Michel Bougard reflects on the end of the magazine's 32nd year and the evolving landscape of ufology, both in French-speaking regions and internationally. He notes the capital role of such publications in providing perspective on these changes. Bougard pays tribute to the late Gordon Creighton, a prominent figure in ufology, and quotes René Fouéré, a pioneer of the field, on the persistent challenge posed by the scientific community's stance on UFO research. Fouéré's 1969 text emphasizes the need for patience, science, and calm, advocating for a strategic approach to challenge the scientific establishment rather than direct confrontation. Bougard highlights that despite 35 years passing, the situation remains largely unchanged, underscoring the need for projects that transcend the 'pro' and 'anti' debates. He also announces the magazine's website will become bilingual (French-English) and seeks collaborators. The editorial concludes with New Year's wishes to the readers and thanks them for their continued support through subscription renewals.

Avis Rectificatif (Correction Notice)

This section addresses a correction regarding an editorial in the previous issue (n°105). Michel Bougard had mentioned an intervention by André Lausberg with CNES concerning statements allegedly made by SEPRA Director Jean-Jacques Velasco. M. Lausberg clarifies that he contacted a CNES representative via internet and received a denial of any excessive statements by Mr. Velasco. The debate is considered provisionally closed, with the responsibility for managing personnel resting with CNES. The notice also clarifies that M. Lausberg's statement about Professor A. Meessen referred to past remarks, not current ones, and that the "explosive report" of Sobeps did not contain unfounded affirmations.

Dossier 1: Vague d'OVNI sur la Belgique (UFO Wave over Belgium)

This section details a special dossier proposed by SOBEPS on the UFO wave that swept across Belgium from autumn 1989 to summer 1991. The dossier includes:

• A preface by Jean-Pierre Petit (CNRS).
• A day-by-day history of events and descriptions of the best cases investigated by SOBEPS.
• An overview of media coverage, including press, TV, and radio.
• Analysis of photos and videos.
• Radar data analysis in collaboration with the Air Force and Gendarmerie.
• The evolving interest from officials and scientists, including a European study project.
• Reports on triangular UFOs abroad and the American wave of '83-'84.
• A discussion on "Stealth" technology.
• Statistical analysis of the wave.
• Personal conclusions from the authors.
• A postface by General Wilfried De Brouwer of the Air Force.

The book is described as essential, offering insights from investigators, witnesses, and researchers. It is a 504-page volume with over 200 illustrations, including color photos.

Dossier 2: Vague d'OVNI sur la Belgique - Une énigme non résolue (UFO Wave over Belgium - An Unresolved Enigma)

This refers to SOBEPS's second activity report on the Belgian wave, published in 1994. It addresses challenges faced by politics and science. The report includes:

• A preface by Isabelle Stengers on the wave as an "anomaly".
• A history of observations and major cases after the first report.
• Details on the wave's characteristics: flight patterns, structures, and physical effects.
• The complete analysis of the Petit-Rechain photograph.
• Coverage of daytime cases and phenomena observed on November 29, 1989, before the Eupen wave.
• Scientific and press reactions to the report.
• Comparison of testimony evolution based on media influence.
• Methods for new research based on available observations and analyses.
• Hypotheses on meteorological disturbances and radar for the March 30-31, 1990 episode (F-16 radars).
• Prospects for scientific ufology and appropriate methodology.
• The stakes of ufological research in relation to democracy and political actions by SOBEPS.

These two works are presented as inseparable and offered as a package deal.

Article: C'est l'histoire d'un ovni et d'un étrange caillou... (It's the story of a UFO and a strange pebble...)

This article by Gérard GRÊDE details an investigation into a sighting and a subsequent discovery.

Part 1: The UFO Phenomenon

On December 19, 2001, between 5 PM and 7 PM, José Capelle and Irène Ronvau, returning home near Namur, Belgium, observed an aerial object. The object was described as a dark, flattened sphere rotating on its axis, moving parallel to the highway. It was estimated to be about 10 meters wide and 8 meters high, at an altitude of approximately 500 meters. The object displayed a series of illuminated "portholes" with yellow light beams directed towards the ground, seemingly searching for something. Capelle, a former Belgian Air Force mechanic, estimated its dimensions. The observation lasted for several tens of seconds before the object moved away and was lost from sight.

Part 2: The Aerolite

Shortly after the UFO sighting, as José Capelle was entering his house, he heard a dull thud. He discovered an incandescent, reddish-mauve object, about 5 cm by 3 cm and weighing around 50 grams, that had fallen on the sidewalk. The object emitted significant heat, preventing him from picking it up directly. After several attempts, he used a fireplace tongs and gardening gloves to retrieve it. He described feeling "waves... energy... magnetism" emanating from it. He initially placed it in the lawn and later stored it in a drawer. The next morning, he noticed it had a gold-silver color and a granular base with crystalline structures. He showed it to neighbors who confirmed it was still warm and felt "magnetized." The object's impact point showed no crater, ruling out a meteorite. Capelle experienced sleep disturbances, prompting a geobiologist to investigate, who detected unusual "waves." The couple temporarily moved to another room. The investigation into the "stone" began nearly four months later.

Investigation and Analysis

Investigator Gérard Grêde, accompanied by physicist Auguste Meessen and photographer Denis Moinil, met with Capelle. Initially, Grêde considered the possibility of a meteorite. Capelle lent two pieces of the fragment for analysis. The object was examined by a jeweler and then by Professor Guy Demortier at the LARN (Laboratory of Analysis by Nuclear Reactions), who confirmed it contained iron and sulfur, consistent with pyrite. Further analysis using X-ray diffraction by Professor Dominique Laduron at the University of Louvain-la-Neuve confirmed it was pyrite (FeS2). The article discusses the unusual color (grey-silver instead of the typical yellow-bronze of pyrite) and the crystalline structure, noting that pyrite crystals form slowly and are typically cubic, unlike marcasite. The analysis also revealed trace elements like lead, zinc, and cobalt. The article explores various hypotheses for the object's origin, including a hoax, a prank, a piece of artificial satellite, or an object jettisoned from an aircraft, ultimately concluding that a non-terrestrial intervention is a possibility, given the unusual circumstances.

Hypotheses on the Stone's Origin

The article systematically dismisses several hypotheses:

1. Hoax: The effort involved and the lack of clear benefit make this unlikely.
2. Prank: The difficulty of launching a hot object precisely and without detection makes this improbable.
3. Scoria from a truck: The intense heat and the specific nature of the object rule this out.
4. Meteorite: Scientific analysis confirmed it was pyrite, not extraterrestrial rock, and the lack of a crater also argued against this.
5. Artificial satellite fragment: While possible, the object's composition (pyrite) and condition make this unlikely.
6. Object jettisoned from an aircraft: The physics of such an event would not allow for the object to become incandescent and fall in this manner.

The article concludes that the event, involving both a UFO sighting and the fall of a hot, unusual stone, is highly unusual and potentially points to a non-terrestrial origin or a complex, unexplained phenomenon.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of Inforespace strongly emphasizes the need for rigorous scientific investigation in ufology, moving beyond simplistic 'pro' or 'anti' stances. The editorial highlights the persistent challenges posed by the scientific establishment and advocates for a methodical, evidence-based approach. The detailed analysis of the "Belgian UFO wave" and the "incandescent stone" case exemplifies this stance, showcasing the application of scientific methods (radar analysis, chemical and crystallographic analysis) to understand anomalous phenomena. The magazine positions itself as a crucial platform for disseminating research and fostering a more mature, international ufological discourse, aiming to bridge the gap between unexplained phenomena and scientific understanding.

This issue of "infospace" (Issue 106) features a collection of articles and discussions centered around unexplained aerial phenomena, with a particular focus on material evidence and eyewitness accounts. The cover highlights an "Erratum" related to issue 106, suggesting corrections or clarifications to previous content, and prominently displays a stylized crystal structure, hinting at a scientific or mineralogical aspect to the covered topics.

Article 1: The Incandescent Pyrite

The issue begins with an in-depth examination of a piece of incandescent pyrite that fell from the sky in Eghezée, Belgium, on December 19, 2001. The author, Patrick Ferryn, discusses the physical properties of pyrite, its thermal behavior, and the unusual circumstances of its appearance. He explores the possibility of induction heating as a means to achieve such high temperatures, noting pyrite's semi-metallic conductivity. The article delves into the natural occurrence of pyrite and its historical significance, as well as the anomaly of its color, suggesting it was subjected to extreme heat. The author concludes that the event, while not directly linked to a UFO, occurred shortly after witnesses observed one, and posits it as a potential psychosociological experiment designed to provoke questions and reactions.

Article 2: The Greifswald Lights

This section, authored by Dr. Illobrand von Ludwiger, Director of MUFON-CES, details the Greifswald lights phenomenon, which occurred on August 24, 1990. Numerous independent witnesses observed formations of luminous spheres in the sky near Greifswald, Germany. The case is presented as one of the most well-documented UFO sightings in Europe, supported by video and photographic evidence. The article describes the unusual behavior of these lights, their movements, and their estimated size and luminosity. It systematically debunks conventional explanations such as aircraft, balloons, or atmospheric phenomena, and discusses the challenges in identifying the objects. The analysis includes estimations of the objects' size (approximately 12 meters in diameter) and luminosity, comparing them to the full moon. The author also notes several peculiar characteristics, such as the lights briefly extinguishing and then reappearing, and smaller objects moving in and out of the main formations.

Article 3: Corrections and Debates on the Assas Incident

This part of the magazine addresses a "Complement d'enquête" regarding the "Affaire d'Assas," a case previously discussed in "infospace." It features contributions from J.L. Peyraut and R. Leclet, who present skeptical viewpoints and offer alternative explanations for the reported events. J.L. Peyraut argues that the Assas case is likely imaginary, citing meteorological data that contradicts the reported conditions and suggesting that the witness might have been mistaken about the date. He also points out similarities between the reported object and military helicopters, specifically Sikorsky models, in terms of size, shape, and sound. R. Leclet contributes by referencing a letter published in "Science et Vie" about radar technology and metallic strips used for military purposes, suggesting these could be misidentified as UFO debris. The section includes a detailed point-by-point rebuttal by "RLT" (likely Patrick Ferryn) to the skeptical arguments, particularly those concerning helicopter sightings. RLT defends the possibility of UFOs by addressing claims about noise levels, the absence of pilots, and the interpretation of physical traces, while also highlighting the limitations of eyewitness testimony given the passage of time.

Article 4: "Une base militaire peut en cacher une autre" (A Military Base Can Hide Another)

This section, presented as an "Erratum," includes a missing paragraph from a previous article by Patrick Ferryn. The paragraph discusses the military base at Quartier Meerdaal, occupied by a multi-force unit responsible for testing pyrotechnic products. It explains that the base conducts daytime fireworks tests, and that the observed phenomena in the Chaumont-Gistoux case did not resemble these projectiles. The author expresses gratitude to the military personnel for their cooperation.

Article 5: "Remerciements" and Greifswald Case Context

This section contains acknowledgments from Patrick Ferryn to various individuals and institutions who assisted in his research, including professors, military authorities, and technical specialists. It also clarifies the intended structure of a "cahier" (special section) in a previous issue, explaining that an article by Dr. von Ludwiger on the Greifswald case was omitted, and an article by Prof. Meessen on "Greifswald and the 'Skeptics'" was included out of context. The magazine then presents Dr. von Ludwiger's article on the Greifswald lights, providing a detailed account and analysis of the event.

Article 6: "TOUTE DERNIERE MINUTE" (Breaking News)

A brief note announces that Wim van Utrecht has sent a response to Patrick Ferryn's article on the Chaumont-Gistoux observations, and that this response will be available on the SOBEPS website.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include the investigation of unexplained aerial phenomena, the analysis of physical evidence (like the pyrite and metallic fragments), and the critical examination of eyewitness accounts. The magazine appears to favor the extraterrestrial hypothesis for UFOs, as indicated by the author's preference for this explanation and the detailed debunking of skeptical arguments. There is a strong emphasis on scientific methodology, even when discussing unconventional topics, with references to scientific analysis, physics, and mineralogy. The editorial stance seems to be one of open inquiry, encouraging readers to question and seek explanations for anomalous events, while also acknowledging the complexities and potential for misinterpretation.

This issue of inforespace (issue 108/109, dated 2004) is a French-language publication from Belgium, focusing on ufology and scientific analysis of anomalous phenomena. The issue features a commentary on an article by sociologist Ron Westrum, written by sociologist Pierre Lagrange, alongside other articles and discussions.

Commentary on Ron Westrum's Article by Pierre Lagrange

Lagrange introduces Ron Westrum as a specialist in the study of scientific controversies surrounding "anomalies." Anomalies are defined as facts that resist dominant paradigms and accepted scientific models. Westrum extends this concept beyond scientific anomalies to include social phenomena, such as battered child syndrome, UFOs, and ball lightning.

Westrum's key contribution, according to Lagrange, is highlighting the importance of establishing channels of information to connect new data with experts capable of integrating it into existing knowledge. Simply accumulating evidence for anomalies is insufficient; a system must be in place to facilitate their acceptance by the scientific community. The acceptance of a new fact depends not only on its scientific validity but also on its ability to be integrated into research and to interest researchers.

Lagrange uses the example of astronomers collaborating with specialists in astronautics to study planets, illustrating how different fields can benefit from interdisciplinary cooperation. He suggests that ufologists could similarly engage with specialists in meteorology or other fields, offering their data in exchange for expertise. Westrum himself, by engaging sociologists and historians of science, has helped integrate the study of UFOs into the history of science.

Lagrange criticizes most ufologists for believing their subject is inherently interesting and failing to generate interest from those outside the field, leading to an isolated "ghetto." He notes that both "believers" and "skeptics" within ufology often fail to engage with mainstream science or produce verifiable research.

The Promises of Ufology by Ron Westrum

Ron Westrum, a sociologist at Eastern Michigan University, reflects on his 1980 essay "The Promises of Ufology." He argues that ufology has largely failed to fulfill its potential, primarily due to its inability to connect with the scientific community. He criticizes the tendency for ufologists to be overly reliant on anecdotal evidence and to reject data that doesn't fit preconceived notions.

Westrum identifies two main problems:

1. An inability to connect: Ufology has remained isolated, failing to engage with related fields like SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) or to integrate its findings into broader scientific literature. While acknowledging that ufologists have faced rejection from the scientific establishment, Westrum also points out that ufologists have done little to bridge this gap.
2. An absence of quality literature and rigor: There's a lack of comprehensive manuals, regular scientific meetings, and consistently published journals. Westrum criticizes the tendency to collect data solely to confirm existing beliefs, rather than rigorously testing hypotheses. He uses the example of the "Unusual Personal Experiences" study, where the findings were not fully exploited or replicated.

Westrum concludes that ufology has accumulated a lot of data but has engaged in excessive speculation without sufficient verification. He calls for a more coherent presentation of facts and a greater effort to connect ufological research with established scientific disciplines.

Bridging Paradigms: A Sociopsychological Perspective

Jean-Michel Abrassart, a psychologist, discusses the perceived conflict between the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH) and the sociopsychological paradigm (SP) in UFO research. He argues that these are not mutually exclusive but rather different lenses through which to view the phenomenon. Abrassart suggests that the debate often devolves into aggressive confrontation rather than constructive dialogue.

He notes that even if UFOs are extraterrestrial, the human response to them is a valid subject of study for psychology and sociology. Abrassart also touches upon the concept of "fantasy-prone personality" and hallucinations, suggesting that these psychological factors can influence witness testimony.

Other Articles and Sections

• J. Scornaux provides several points of commentary on previous articles, questioning interpretations and offering alternative explanations for reported phenomena, such as the use of aluminum chaff by military aircraft and the possibility of misidentifying helicopters.
• V. B. Bousquet comments on the accuracy of a map related to the Assas incident, questioning the location of the "cloche de lumière" and the identity of a potential witness.
• The issue includes a "Bibliography" section listing numerous academic and ufological works, indicating the research base for the articles.
• A "Notes" section provides context and explanations for references made in the articles, including information on James Oberg, the CSICOP, and the Parapsychological Association.
• A "Service Librairie de la SOBEPS" section advertises books related to UFOs available for purchase from the publisher, along with subscription information for the magazine.
• A "SOBEPS is on the Internet" section announces the launch of the organization's website.
• A section on "Le Pin's de la SOBEPS" promotes a collectible pin.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critical analysis of UFO phenomena, the methodologies employed in ufological research, and the relationship between ufology and mainstream science. There is a strong emphasis on the need for scientific rigor, evidence-based investigation, and interdisciplinary collaboration. The editorial stance appears to advocate for a more mature and scientifically grounded approach to ufology, moving beyond speculation and isolation towards a more integrated understanding of anomalous phenomena. The magazine encourages a dialogue between different perspectives, aiming to advance the field through critical evaluation and constructive engagement.

Title: Inforespace
Issue: Semestrielle (Bi-annual)
Publisher: SOBEPS
Country: France
Language: French

This issue of Inforespace, published by SOBEPS, focuses on the association's activities and resources related to the study of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP).

SOBEPS Association and Mission

The SOBEPS association is presented as a non-profit organization dedicated to the rational observation and study of UAP and related issues. It operates on a purely voluntary basis, covering investigations and the unbiased dissemination of collected information. The association emphasizes that its activities are not driven by any specific religious, philosophical, or political agenda.

Publication and Collaboration

Information is disseminated through a bi-annual review, Inforespace, and also via conferences and debates. The editorial team for Inforespace relies heavily on the goodwill and free time of volunteer collaborators. Consequently, the publication schedule is not fixed, and delays may occur, as the edition does not have a commercial character. Members are strongly encouraged to contribute information relevant to the subjects covered in the review. They are also invited to participate in promoting the society and, within their means, to become active members by collaborating on various tasks such as translation, research, secretarial work, and coding.

Reporting UAP Observations

Individuals who observe an unusual aerial phenomenon, or who are aware of such an observation by others, are urged to report it to SOBEPS as quickly as possible.

Secretariat and Library Access

The SOBEPS secretariat and library are accessible to members by appointment only. Visits are scheduled for Saturdays between 2 PM and 6 PM. During these times, members can consult the association's extensive documentation, including books and magazines. To arrange a visit, members are asked to make an appointment with the secretariat. For administrative inquiries, members can call 02/521.74.04, but this line is only available on Saturdays between 2 PM and 6 PM. Fax communication is possible at 02/520.73.93.

A dedicated phone line, 02/524.28.48, is reserved exclusively for reporting testimonies. This line is equipped with an automatic answering machine and is available 24 hours a day.

SOBEPS Slide Collection

The association's collection of slides is currently depleted. However, SOBEPS is offering some exceptional series, each accompanied by commentaries regarding the origin of the documents. These include:

• Three series of 12 color slides each, priced at €15 per set of 12 photographs (equivalent to 600 Belgian Francs or 100 French Francs). A package deal for all three series is available for €42 (equivalent to 1700 Belgian Francs or 280 French Francs).
• Two series of 12 slides focusing on the Belgian wave of UAP sightings between 1989 and 1991. These are offered as two inseparable packets totaling 24 documents for €18.5 (equivalent to 750 Belgian Francs or 120 French Francs).

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue highlights the core activities of SOBEPS: UAP observation, research, information dissemination, and member engagement. The editorial stance is one of rational, unbiased investigation and a strong reliance on volunteer contributions. The magazine serves as a platform for sharing findings and encouraging active participation from its membership in the ongoing study of unexplained aerial phenomena.