Hypotheses Extraterrestres - No 18 - avril 1981

Magazine Overview

This issue of "Hypothèses EXTRATERRESTRES" (ISSN 0399-5216, No. 18) is dated April 1981 and is published in France. The cover headline is "-Objets Volants Non Identifiés-". The price for France is 15 Frs, and for other countries, it is also 15 Frs. The issue includes a review of the book "CONTACT OVNI A CERGY PONTOISE".

Editorial Stance and Content

The magazine opens with an "EDITORIAL" which is an open letter to Monsieur Jimmy Guieu. The editorial expresses disappointment with the "World Institute of Advanced Science" (IMSA) and its "CONTACT IMSA" special issue from November 1980. The author, Michel Piccin, president of GEOS France, criticizes Guieu's understanding of GEOS and accuses him of spreading unsubstantiated claims. Piccin defends GEOS and GEPAN, refuting Guieu's criticisms and suggesting that Guieu suffers from "Gépanophobie." The editorial also addresses a previous article in the magazine, clarifying that it was a relation of facts, not an investigation, and that the investigation itself was under Piccin's responsibility since December 1979. He asserts that while the possibility of a hoax cannot be definitively disproven, the "scientific" investigation published by IMSA is flawed.

Piccin further challenges Guieu's claims regarding a railway line and Mr. Jean Bastide, implying that Guieu's intellectual honesty is questionable. The editorial concludes by stating that the existence of the railway line and its use can be easily verified, suggesting that Guieu's narrative is misleading.

Articles and Features

Chercheurs et Groupements: This section is a space for readers to post announcements related to the UFO phenomenon.

Lettre ouverte à Monsieur Jimmy Guieu: This is the main editorial piece discussed above.

Entre chien et choux: This section addresses a specific case, likely related to the Cergy-Pontoise incident, where a dog reportedly had abnormal reactions. The magazine investigates and finds that the adjudant (sergeant major) present stated the dog showed no abnormal reaction. It also clarifies that the choux (cabbages) were harvested, not 'shaved' as implied, and that the owner did not hide anything.

A propos du livre de Cergy-Pontoise: This section critically reviews a book about the Cergy-Pontoise UFO case. The authors state that the book reads like a novel, not an investigation, and lacks scientific method or serious investigation. They question the concept of "advanced science" and the reliability of hypnosis as a method for authentication. They criticize the book for not thoroughly investigating the case, relying on hearsay, and potentially misleading readers.

Les activités des associations: This section likely details activities of various UFO research groups.

Notre document photo: This section likely presents photographic evidence related to UFO sightings.

Cas Alto Da Mooca: This section details a specific UFO case from Alto Da Mooca.

Atterrissage à Serodino: This section describes a landing incident in Serodino.

Les anciens numéros de la revue: Information on the availability of past issues of the magazine.

Service de documentation: Information about the magazine's documentation service.

Conditions d'abonnement: Details on how to subscribe to the magazine, including different subscription levels (normal, support, international) and benefits for GEOS members.

Les anciens numéros de notre revue sont disponibles: A list of available back issues from 1977 to 1980.

DES PUBLICITES MENSONGERES par Jean Bastide: This is a critical review of books by Charles Berlitz ("Le triangle des Bermudes") and Maurice Chatelain ("Le temps et l'espace"). The author quotes "La Recherche" magazine's review of Berlitz's book and questions Chatelain's credentials and the content of his book, suggesting it is not good science fiction.

MIBERIE (par Jean Bastide): This section discusses the concept of Men in Black (MIB), referencing a book where they are described as having white, unified eyes and being "empty." The author connects this to Carlos Castaneda's ideas of immaterial beings and questions the source of such information.

TELETRANSPORTATION: This section discusses an alleged teletransportation case from Manosque to Marseille. The authors express skepticism, noting that Jean-Pierre, a key figure, claims to have invented the story to avoid offending Jimmy Guieu. They suggest that Jean-Pierre likely walked the distance and that the story is not a genuine teletransportation event. They also mention potential commercial exploitation of the Cergy-Pontoise case.

UNE INSCRIPTION BIEN ALLEMANDE: This section analyzes a detail from Jean-Pierre's account under hypnosis, where he mentions a German cross and inscriptions in German. The author points out that "Qua-Gen" is French, not German, and questions the accuracy of the hypnosis session and the book's interpretation, linking it to the common UFO trope of Nazi connections.

RENCONTRE RAPPROCHEE AVEC LA LUNE par Jean Bastide: This section debunks a report of a car abduction by a ball, stating it was an illusion caused by the rising moon. It also addresses another observation by Mr. Jean De Vincenzi, similarly identified as the moon.

A PROPOS DE " CONTACT OVNI CERGY-PONTOISES": This is a detailed critique of the book "Contact OVNI Cergy-Pontoise." The authors argue that the book is a novel rather than an investigation, lacks scientific rigor, and relies heavily on hypnosis without proper controls. They criticize the book's methodology and the claims made within it, particularly regarding the Cergy-Pontoise case.

FAQ: The issue includes a Frequently Asked Questions section addressing topics like the purpose of reader sections, submission policies, subscription details, and advertising.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are critical analysis of UFO literature and claims, skepticism towards unsubstantiated reports, and a focus on rigorous investigation. The editorial stance is clearly critical of sensationalism and what the authors perceive as flawed methodologies in ufology, particularly concerning the Cergy-Pontoise case and the work of certain researchers like Jimmy Guieu and organizations like IMSA. The magazine emphasizes the importance of verifying sources, conducting thorough investigations, and presenting factual accounts rather than speculative or fictionalized narratives. There is a strong undercurrent of defending the credibility of ufology by distinguishing it from "show business" and commercial exploitation.

This issue of "LA REVUE DE L'UNIVERS OVNI!" (The Review of the Universe UFO!) from 1980 delves into various aspects of UFO phenomena and extraterrestrial encounters. It features a mix of investigative reports, witness testimonies, and discussions on related topics, including alleged government cover-ups and interpretations of ancient texts.

Conference on UFOs and Ancient Texts

The issue begins by recounting a conference given by Jimmy Guieu in May 1980 at the cultural center of AMORC in Paris. The author notes the prohibition of sound recording, necessitating paper notes and photographs. The conference reportedly covered unconventional interpretations of ancient texts, suggesting that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed by thermo-nuclear bombs and that Ezekiel's CE III was censored by the church. The speaker also touched upon the idea that nuclear submarines could have existed in ancient times and that the biblical story of Jonah might refer to a submersible.

Allegations of Government Secrecy and Suppression

A significant portion of the article discusses the alleged "black-out" of information regarding UFOs by "occult governments" worldwide. The speaker, Franck Fontaine, claims that these entities consciously sabotage information about UFOs and are willing to eliminate individuals who know too much. Fontaine himself reportedly fears for his safety, stating he "looks twice before crossing the street." The article suggests that individuals like Franck, Salomon, and Jean-Pierre are also at risk. The GEPAN (Groupe d'Études des Phénomènes Aériens Non identifiés) is mentioned as potentially trying to infiltrate or neutralize organizations like IMSA (Institut Mondial des Sciences Avancées) to control information or substitute it with less significant data.

An anecdote is shared about a meeting where a member of IMSA was allegedly insulted by someone sent by GEPAN. The speaker asserts that IMSA possesses its own investigation methods, which are considered superior to those of smaller groups, and are better equipped to find answers to UFO-related questions.

Extraterrestrial Arrival and Mental Force

Regarding the predicted arrival of extraterrestrials on August 15th, the speaker stated they would not appear if military or police were present. However, a large group of people gathered near Cergy with a strong desire for contact might encourage their arrival, as the "mental force" generated could influence them. The speaker also noted that there are "favorable points" in France for such an event, but the exact locations are unknown.

Case Study: Alto da Mooca, Brazil

This section details an encounter reported by Madame Amalia in the Alto da Mooca neighborhood of Sao-Paulo, Brazil, on July 11, 1978. While watching television, she noticed a strange noise and then saw two small beings, approximately 1.25 meters tall, with metallic helmets and grey suits, standing near her patio door. An ovoïde craft with three legs was positioned in the patio. One being approached her, while the other interacted with the craft. The beings then entered their craft, which ascended and disappeared. Madame Amalia experienced temporary paralysis and shock.

The beings were described as thin with disproportionately large heads, yellowish skin, and round, deep-set eyes. They wore a metallic helmet with a faint blue light and a wide belt with various objects. The craft was described as ovoïde, with a shiny silver band, blue rings, and oval hatches emitting yellow light. It had conical supports and a diameter of about 3 meters, with a height of 3 meters. Two yellow lights were observed 1.5 meters from the craft.

Key positive points of this case include the non-disclosure of the event, the absence of a messianic message, the witness's paralysis, the sound of "insects," and the smell of ammonia (or nitrogen gas). The witness also noted the beings' ability to glide without touching the ground and a material light emitted by their equipment. The craft's color was described as old silver, and it emitted a material light. The beings reportedly disinfected themselves with a gas before leaving.

Negative points for this case include the seemingly inconvenient landing location and the absence of other witnesses or material evidence.

Case Study: Serodino, Argentina

This report details an encounter by Mr. Ernaldo Cunasoni in Serodino, Santa-Fé, Argentina, on February 26, 1979. While working in a field at night, he observed a bright light and then a bizarre object moving at high speed, which landed about 40 meters away. The object was described as ovoïde, emitting a strong light. A humanoid figure, approximately 1.10 to 1.20 meters tall, emerged from the craft. The figure had a strange silhouette, with no visible arms or legs, and a head resembling a trumpet. It wore a highly reflective, light-emitting suit. The figure approached Mr. Cunasoni, stopped, and then returned to the object. The UFO then ascended vertically and disappeared to the south at high speed. The entire event lasted only 2 to 3 minutes.

After the UFO's departure, Mr. Cunasoni found a circle about 13 meters in diameter in the soy field, where the plants were dried or slightly burnt. He also noted the presence of tripod traces and rectangular marks. The object's color was described as reddish-violet, and it emitted an intense light. It made a humming sound upon departure. The witness compared the object's format to photographs from Bariloche (April 14, 1978) and Los Molinos (May 5, 1979), noting similarities.

Other Sections

The magazine also includes a section on the activities of associations, mentioning the G.E.O.V.I. and its participation in a fair. A service for obtaining UFO-related books is also advertised. The issue lists several UFO-related books available for purchase, including titles on the Blue Book project, extraterrestrial encounters, and specific sightings. It also offers 12 photos of UFOs from recent years.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, extraterrestrial encounters, alleged government cover-ups, and the interpretation of phenomena through a lens of skepticism and investigation. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry into UFOs, while also critically examining witness testimonies and evidence, as seen in the detailed analysis of the Alto da Mooca and Serodino cases. There is a clear emphasis on presenting detailed accounts and evaluating their credibility. The magazine also promotes a collection of UFO literature, suggesting a desire to educate and inform its readership on the subject.