GEOS International - No 4 - janv-fevr 1970 (incomplet)

Magazine Overview

Title: GEOS INTERNATIONAL
Issue: No. 4
Publication Date: July 15, 1969 (Adhesion date)
Publisher: Groupe d'Études des Objets Spatiaux de France (GEOS)
Content Type: Magazine focused on UFOs and related phenomena.

Editorial

The editorial, written by Gérard LEBAT, marks a new phase for GEOS International with its first printed cover. LEBAT expresses gratitude to the readers for the magazine's rapid expansion and growing readership, attributing this success to their passion for the subject. He outlines plans for a more luxurious presentation in the future, contingent on reader support through subscriptions and spreading the word. Readers are encouraged to send in addresses of potential subscribers, distribute promotional material, request sample copies, and find new members. The editorial also acknowledges those who regularly send press clippings and information about flying saucers, and invites owners of detectors to submit reports of any observations.

LEBAT reflects on the year 1969, noting that while initial predictions of widespread sightings in France and Western Europe did not materialize, the year saw increased activity in October and November. He expresses appreciation for an article in 'Les informations de l'Ingénieur' that featured excerpts from GEOS's interviews, validating their research.

Table of Contents (Sommaire)

The table of contents lists the following articles:

• EDITORIAL
• "LES ANOMALIES" D'APOLLO 12.
• HUMANOIDES
• NOS ENQUETES.
• UN U.F.O. POURSUIT UN CYCLISTE.
• APRES "LES DOSSIERS DE L'ECRAN".
• SEUL CONTRE TOUS.
• LES U.S.A. FERMENT "BLUE BOOK".
• NOS INFORMATIONS.
• LES POLITICIENS NIENT L'EXISTENCE DES O. V. N. I.
• VISIBILITE DU SATELLITE PAGEOS 1.
• SERVICE DOCUMENTATION.

Key Articles and Reports

The First Appearance of Unusual Objects Comes from Mexico

This section reports on two separate sightings. In Panama, residents of a peripheral neighborhood claimed to have seen a large, oval-shaped flying saucer with numerous portholes and a greenish light, which disappeared towards the horizon at a vertiginous speed. Separately, an unidentified flying object moving from East to West was observed over the Mexico airport by several people. Despite an alert to the control tower, its nature could not be determined. Witnesses described the object as dark and moving at high speed. Airport authorities confirmed it was neither an airplane nor a dirigible.

"The Anomalies" of Apollo 12

Authored by Jacques POTTIER, this article discusses anomalies during the Apollo 12 mission. POTTIER recounts the sudden interruption of radio transmission as the LEM approached the lunar surface. He recalls a phrase from the cosmonauts, "We see something," which he initially doubted but later became certain of. He questions the official explanation that an earlier sighting was a rocket stage, arguing that trained cosmonauts could distinguish between a rocket stage and an unidentified object. POTTIER also notes that the object he himself perceived as "something" was very bright on the lunar surface. He mentions NASA's precautions, including the stopping of loudspeakers during a previous sighting by Young in July 1966, and the subsequent control NASA exerted over the broadcast of Apollo transmissions.

POTTIER further questions why the TV camera on the LEM did not function for public broadcast, citing a "malfunction" as the official reason. He points out that no repair order was given from Houston. He also notes that the camera transmitting the descent of the LEM's ladder functioned perfectly, even being tilted to show images upside down, suggesting it was operational. He concludes that something was seen that was not shown to the public, leaving open the question of its extraterrestrial origin.

Humanoids

Translated by Jocelyne LE FAUCHEUR, this article addresses accusations that UFO and humanoid witnesses are merely fabulists seeking publicity. It highlights the case of Monsieur S., who reported a startling encounter on September 4, 1964, while hunting in the California mountains. After losing his companions, he saw a light that he initially mistook for a lantern. The light then approached him, hovering silently. He observed it was not a lantern or a helicopter. He described it as eight to ten inches in diameter, white, and accompanied by two or three other objects in formation. The main light flashed, and a dark object fell to the ground. Monsieur S. then noticed a dome-shaped object about 400-500 yards away. Subsequently, two humanoid figures, about five feet five inches tall, wearing silver-grey suits and helmets, appeared, followed by a dark-grey creature with orange, brilliant eyes and a mouth like a ventriloquist's dummy. This third creature was referred to as a 'robot'.

The humanoids and the robot examined the undergrowth. The robot emitted a puff of smoke towards Monsieur S. Fearing for his life, he climbed higher into the tree. He shot arrows at the robot, which seemed to be made of metal. He threw his canteen, which the creatures examined. He then set fire to his cap and threw it, causing the beings to retreat temporarily. The robot again emitted smoke, and Monsieur S. lost consciousness. He revived and continued to throw burning objects throughout the night. He shed his camouflage equipment, jacket, and cap. At dawn, another robot appeared, and the four creatures surrounded the tree, their chests emitting light.

Alone Against All

Authored by Gérard LEBAT, this article criticizes the ORTF's handling of a debate on UFOs. LEBAT argues that Monsieur Fouéré should not have been replaced by François Le Lyonnais, but by another specialist like Aimé Michel. He questions whether the ORTF is submitting to external pressures by preventing René Fouéré from appearing on camera. LEBAT also seeks to identify the individuals who intervened to have the GEPA representative excluded from the debate. He quotes Kant, stating that "Truth does not always triumph; its detractors eventually die," and asserts that the public desires truth about UFOs. He commends Armand Jammot and Guy Darbois for their program 'Les Dossiers de l'Ecran' on December 10, 1969, as a step towards impartiality and freedom of expression, hoping for a "grand day" of revelation.

LEBAT recounts that on December 16, 1969, Guy TARADE was alone in confronting official science representatives on the TV program 'Les Dossiers de l'Ecran', where he argued against the prevailing skepticism regarding flying saucers.

The USA Closes "Blue Book"

Authored by Thierry BEAUFORT, this article discusses the closure of Project Blue Book. Guy TARADE, with the help of Edmond Campagnac, described an observation witnessed by over 20,000 people in Madagascar, which remained unidentified by the scientific committee. The article expresses outrage at the way the TV program was presented, criticizing the selection of only two specialists in favor of four scientists to debate the issue. It questions the explanations and affirmations made by Monsieur Le Lyonnais, a scientific journalist, who claimed all cases had been identified. The article disputes the Condon Report, calling it the most serious scientific study but noting it leaves nearly 5% of observations unexplained. It suggests that Le Lyonnais should consult the Project Blue Book reports, which contain over 10,000 dossiers, with more than 700 classified as unidentified.

BEAUFORT concludes by protesting the program's conduct and quoting EZECHIEL: "Son of man, you dwell among a rebellious people, people who have eyes to see but do not see, ears to hear but do not hear..."

The article notes that on December 18, 1969, a dispatch from the USA via Agence France-Presse (AFP) announced that the Americans were closing Project Blue Book.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of GEOS INTERNATIONAL strongly advocates for the serious investigation of UFO phenomena, challenging official explanations and media portrayals. There is a clear stance against skepticism and a call for greater transparency and impartiality in reporting. The magazine positions itself as a platform for presenting evidence and witness accounts that contradict conventional scientific and governmental narratives. The editorial emphasizes reader engagement and the importance of disseminating information about UFOs, humanoids, and related anomalies, particularly those surrounding space missions like Apollo 12. The closure of Project Blue Book is presented as a significant event, reinforcing the idea of a potential cover-up or dismissal of evidence.

This issue of "NOS INFORMATIONS" (Our Information), dated May 1969, focuses on the persistent problem of flying saucers (soucoupes volantes) and unidentified flying objects (UFOs).

Official Closure and Continued Sightings

The issue opens by referencing a statement by Minister Robert Seaman, who declared the problem of flying saucers officially buried. This decision was made because, after 22 years of study by the air force and various commissions, no concrete results had been achieved, and the cost to American taxpayers for Project Blue Book exceeded 3 million francs. The article questions this decision, recalling the establishment of the first American UFO study commission in December 1947, followed by Project TWINKLE, and its official dissolution in December 1949. At that time, the conclusion was that sightings were mere hallucinations, and the military feigned disinterest. However, the article notes that sightings have considerably increased, leading to the discreet recreation of commissions under different names like GRUDGES, SIGN, and finally BLUE BOOK, which concluded under President Nixon.

The magazine questions whether the dossier is truly closed, asserting that the flying saucer problem persists. It recalls a 1952 declaration by a U.S. Air Force spokesperson promising full disclosure and public conclusions to investigations. The article asks if these promises still hold true and if the Condon report truly closed the inquiry, questioning why it wasn't concluded earlier, in January 1968.

Scientific Analysis and Perspectives

The issue highlights key findings from the Condon report, stating that there is no scientific proof of UFO existence, nor proof of their non-existence. It notes that 90% of observations could be explained, but questions what happened to the remaining 10% that engaged the specialists of the Colorado project. The report also indicates that UFOs do not constitute a threat to national security. Carl Sagan is quoted as saying, "If we are visited by extraterrestrial travelers, it would be foolish not to be interested." The article concludes this section by stating that a new commission is now awaited.

Case Reports

Farm Invaded by Flying Saucers (Le Journal de Québec, May 24, 1969)

This section details an incident at the farm of Leo-Paul Chaput in Chapeau, Canada. For some time, strange flying machines had been using his fields as a landing strip. A particularly striking incident occurred three weeks prior, on a Sunday around 2 AM. Chaput and his family witnessed an intense light emanating from a field 400 feet from their house. Upon investigation, they encountered four objects, approximately 30 feet in diameter and 16 feet high, emitting such intense light that they had to shield their eyes. The phenomenon lasted five to six minutes. After the objects departed, the lights extinguished, and a boat-like engine sound was heard. The next morning, they discovered the field had been burned in four circular areas, each 27 feet in diameter and two feet deep. Trees were also burned, and the grass was still smoldering in some places. The Chaput family reported seeing the visitors several more times, hovering over their fields at an altitude of about 500 feet, emitting an orange glow.

Mysterious Phenomenon in the Sky (Le Républicain Lorrain, November 17, 1969)

This report describes an event in Neufmaisons, France, where Rodolphe Muller observed a luminous celestial manifestation at a 45° angle above the horizon. It appeared as an intense red disc that elongated to a dimension of 1.70 meters, emitting fine jets of white light. The manifestation seemed to undulate like a caterpillar. Muller's wife also witnessed the phenomenon as it reduced to a fireball and vanished within seconds. The mayor of Neufmaisons, Monsieur Idoux, was also informed. Later that night, Muller's son, Claude, returning from work, witnessed similar manifestations three times to the east.

U.S. Air Force Data

The magazine presents data provided by the U.S. Air Force concerning the total number of UFO observations and unidentified cases analyzed by the Project Blue Book from 1947 to 1969. The total number of observations is 12,618, with 701 remaining unidentified.

Politicians Deny O.V.N.I. Existence

This section, translated by Jacques Pottier, extracts from "U.F.O. Nachrichten." Dr. Buhler explains that scientists know O.V.N.I. (Objects Volants Non Identifiés - Unidentified Flying Objects) exist, but their existence is denied for political reasons. The president of the Brazilian UFO study society noted a high number of appearances and landings in Brazil, with significant elements originating from the Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo regions. Dr. Buhler stated that UFOs appeared in large waves in 1954, late 1957, and throughout 1958, with the phenomenon continuing uninterruptedly. While these appearances are spread globally, most landings occur in South America, particularly Brazil, which has many researchers studying the subject.

Regarding the origin of UFOs, Dr. Buhler explains that the late physician Olavo Fontes examined metal fragments from an accidentally downed UFO. He identified metals not found on Earth, including an isotope of magnesium with a much higher density than terrestrial magnesium. The purity of this sample was unknown on Earth, and creating magnesium of such density would be impossible. Furthermore, a photograph of a disc-shaped object over Trinidad is presented as proof of an extraterrestrial aerial vehicle. This object was not detected by radar, despite being only 14 km away. The incident also caused all the boat's aggregates to fall simultaneously, suggesting the action of magnetic forces potentially millions of gauss strong. The physician estimated the object's speed at 70,000 km/hour, explaining its rapid traversal of the observed distance in one second.

Conclusions

When asked why UFOs are denied despite evidence, Dr. Buhler cited Professor Hulvio Brant Aleixio, who wrote in 1968 that despite thousands of UFOs in the sky, the number is always reduced or silenced because they cannot be understood. This "ostrich policy" is attributed to a lack of assurance from official centers. Dr. Buhler added that incidents like the Trinidad UFO present scientists with a serious problem, and it is easier to ignore these phenomena than to admit ignorance. Most scientists also fear for their reputation and prefer not to offer opinions.

Call for Collaboration

The magazine solicits collaboration from its members for the bulletin's redaction, including translation of foreign languages and submission of articles or study results. They also express gratitude to readers and members who send press clippings or radio communiqués related to flying saucers.

Service Documentation

A service is offered to procure books on UFOs and related topics for members, with all costs included. The service is not commercial but aims to provide access to French and foreign works on the subject.

Book Listings

The issue includes a list of available books in French and English, with their prices, covering topics such as unusual space phenomena, UFOs, extraterrestrials, and ancient civilizations.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the persistent mystery of UFOs, the perceived government cover-up or denial of their existence, and the presentation of various sighting reports and scientific analyses. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, encouraging the collection and dissemination of information, and questioning official narratives that dismiss the phenomenon. There's a clear emphasis on the ongoing nature of UFO sightings despite official pronouncements, and a desire to understand the subject through witness accounts, data analysis, and scientific investigation.

This document is a blank page from a magazine issue. No content is discernible, rendering it impossible to extract any specific information about the magazine's title, issue details, publisher, content, or any other metadata. Therefore, all fields related to the magazine's content and characteristics remain null or empty.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

As the provided page is entirely blank, no themes or editorial stances can be identified or inferred from this document.