Gazette des Mousquetaires - No 75 - Extras et ou Intras Terrestres

Magazine Overview

Title: La Gazette des Mousquetaires De l'Ufo
Issue Date: December 26, 2019
Issue Number: 75

This issue of "La Gazette des Mousquetaires De l'Ufo" delves into various aspects of ufology, featuring a mix of personal accounts, book reviews, and analyses of historical and contemporary UFO phenomena. The magazine maintains a critical yet open stance, encouraging readers to seek truth and question official narratives.

I - Suite à l'article de La Gazette n°74bis - Conférence sur les "Lumières de Phénix"

This section details a conference on the "Phoenix Lights" incident, featuring a statement from former Arizona Governor Fife Symington. Symington recounts his personal observation of a massive, silent, unidentified aerial object over Squaw Peak, which he initially kept secret due to his position. He explains his reticence by stating that public officials often try to explain everything, and admitting ignorance could be seen as weakness. However, he now believes it's time to face the UFO problem objectively. The article includes a link to a video excerpt from a W9 documentary where Symington discusses the event. Gildas Bourdais comments, maintaining his belief in Symington's testimony and highlighting the strength of the Phoenix case, regardless of whether Symington is considered a sole witness.

II - Parution de la traduction italienne de l'autobiographie de Jacques Bergier

This section announces the Italian publication of Jacques Bergier's autobiography, "Io non sono leggenda" (I am not a legend), translated by Andrea Scarabelli. The Italian edition, published by Bietti, is noted for its thoroughness, containing 348 pages compared to the original French edition's 240. It includes enriched notes, a censored chapter, the project for "L'homme infini," two CVs of Bergier, an introduction by Sebastiano Fusco, a commentary by Scarabelli, an Italian bibliography, and an index. The review highlights Scarabelli's work in clarifying Bergier's citations and correcting errors, such as the circumstances surrounding the attempted re-edition of Bergier's "Manuel du parfait saboteur" and the death of Giangiacomo Feltrinelli.

III - Ça vient de sortir... et rappel d'édition

This part introduces two new books related to ufology. The first is "OANI / OVNI - Enquête, méthode, réflexion" by Sylvain Matisse. The book explores "Oanis," or aquatic unidentified aerial phenomena, drawing on numerous testimonies from the merchant and military marine. Matisse's work aims to differentiate between myth and reality concerning Oanis and suggests that the key to our universe might lie in the oceans.

The second book discussed is "O.V.N.I. dans l'Yonne" by Rémy Fauchereau. Fauchereau, a ufologist and head of AEPA, has spent about forty years investigating aerial phenomena. His book compiles his research, observations, and archival information, aiming to share knowledge about the UFO phenomenon. He believes in other forms of life in the universe based on his findings.

IV - Ça vient de sortir aussi : "Entretien avec l'Alien" (en français)

This section reviews the French translation of "Alien Interview," titled "Entretien avec l'Alien," translated by Jean Librero. The book is based on the alleged telepathic communications between nurse Matilda O'Donnell MacElroy and a living extraterrestrial captured at Roswell in 1947. The article notes that the book contains Top Secret military transcriptions and final notes from MacElroy. It is available for order online and is presented as a potentially groundbreaking work that could offer a new dimension to our understanding of the universe and ufology.

Discussion on Constellations and NASA Symbols

Several contributors discuss the significance of constellations like Orion, the Great Bear, and Sirius, particularly in relation to NASA mission blazons. Michel Turco notes that pyramids were aligned with these constellations and that Orion and the Great Bear appear on NASA emblems, suggesting a possible hidden meaning or connection to extraterrestrial visitors. Jean Claude Venturini acknowledges the observation but questions whether it's purely aesthetic or symbolic. Guy Coat also points out the frequent references to Orion as a source of many things. Gilles Lorant expands on the ancient astronomical observations of Orion and the Great Bear, suggesting that these celestial bodies may have been chosen as symbols by civilizations due to their immutability. He posits that this could relate to the possibility of an exogenous origin for part of life on Earth and ancient stone constructions. He suggests that these symbols might represent humanity's quest for eternity and expansion into the stars, a concept that aligns with NASA's ambitious projects.

V - Publier... ce que d'autres ne veulent pas...

Bruno Mancusi shares his experience of having his critique of Thomas Margout's thesis on UFOs finally published in "La Gazette des Mousquetaires de l'Ufo" after facing difficulties with other publications. He thanks the editors for providing an "ufological asylum."

Jean Louis Peyraut discusses his article "La caverne des étoiles," which he wrote in 1995 after demonstrating that the "Roswell autopsie" video was a montage. He laments the lack of reaction from various media outlets to his findings, suggesting that the media often avoids controversial topics or dismisses evidence as fake.

La Caverne des Etoiles

This article revisits the Roswell incident, critically examining the "alien autopsy" film and the subsequent events. It recounts the initial crash in July 1947, the military's announcement of a "Flying Disk" capture, and the later retraction. The article highlights Colonel Jesse Marcel's post-retirement admission that the debris was from an unknown technology and that military personnel found and removed the wreckage and occupants. It also mentions Steven Schiff's efforts in 1994 to have the US General Accounting Office investigate the administrative management of the Roswell incident.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include the analysis of specific UFO cases (Phoenix Lights, Roswell), the exploration of extraterrestrial contact and technology, the historical and mythological significance of celestial bodies, and the critical examination of official narratives versus alternative explanations. The magazine's stance appears to be one of encouraging open inquiry, critical thinking, and the pursuit of truth, even when it challenges established beliefs or official accounts. The editorial approach is to present diverse viewpoints and research, allowing readers to draw their own conclusions.

Title: La Gazette des Mousquetaires de l'Ufo
Issue: n°75
Date: December 26, 2019

This issue of "La Gazette des Mousquetaires de l'Ufo" delves into the controversial alien autopsy film that emerged in the 1990s, presenting a critical analysis that suggests it was a deliberate fabrication.

The "Grande Muette" and the Autopsy Film

The article begins by referencing the US Air Force's 1994 report on a crash, which initially attributed it to a weather balloon but later admitted it was part of the secret "Project Mogul." This official explanation was met with skepticism by the American media. Simultaneously, a rumor spread about a film showing the 1947 autopsy of an extraterrestrial creature, purportedly filmed in a secret military laboratory and soon to be available.

The "Merlin Group," a British audiovisual production company, acquired a 3-minute film from cameraman Ray Santilli, who claimed to have filmed the event in 1947. After editing, the film was commercialized and distributed internationally, appearing on television programs in 27 countries.

Analyzing the "Magic Eye" of the Camera

The author uses the metaphor of a "magic eye" to describe the camera's ability to reveal and conceal. The film depicts a small room, approximately 5-6 meters by 4 meters, resembling a dispensary. An "eye" (clock) is visible on the back wall, with tables and instruments against it. A window on the right-hand corner wall shows a person in a "surgeon-style" insulating suit observing the room.

Inside, an alleged alien lies on a "billard" (operating table) with a severely damaged right leg. Two figures in fully insulated suits with "helmets" are performing a dissection. The camera records these operations, highlighting differences from a human body. The camera moves, frequently returning to the clock on the wall. The author questions if the cameraman was instinctively measuring time.

The Non-Existent Wall: Evidence of a Hoax?

The author's suspicion is aroused by the repetitive shots of the clock and the consistent visibility of the back wall. Crucially, the wall opposite the clock, despite the camera's movements, *never* appears in the footage. This is particularly noticeable when the camera focuses on the left profile of the creature but never shows the right profile. This "chronic imbalance" in the footage leads the author to believe the "operating room" is not real.

The author argues that only two walls are shown, with no doors or ceiling. The wall opposite the clock *should* be visible due to the camera's movement. By drawing an imaginary line dividing the room, the author observes that wide shots are limited to the "right side" near the clock wall. When the camera moves to the other side, only "overhead shots" of the alleged corpse are shown. This precise framing implies a deliberate "cutting" and "censorship." The author concludes that this hidden wall does not exist, and the scene is merely a set with the filming crew present behind a backdrop.

The Simulation and its Implications

The article asserts that the documentary is a simulation. The author dismisses an alternative explanation of a hidden bay with high-ranking individuals visible, citing the strict security implied by the "surgeon" attire. Such restricted areas would necessitate similar attire for all personnel, rendering even high-ranking figures unrecognizable.

Russian Dolls: Unraveling the Deception

Discovering the "documentary" is fiction raises further questions, particularly about the media's failure to identify the "transparent" trick. The article questions why specialists on TF1 were absent from this analysis.

The investigation turns to the "inventors" of the film, seeking to determine when and where it was shot, and the identities of the actors. The film reportedly generated significant revenue (three billion centimes). However, the author suspects a more complex motive than mere profit, likening it to "Russian dolls" where one deception hides another.

The author suggests that for a company to participate in such a hoax, the risk is enormous, and the fraud is easily detectable. The article questions why a more convincing film wasn't produced, with more varied shots and a modified set during filming, which is standard practice for fiction.

This peculiar conduct leads the author to a significant suspicion:

THE REAL PURPOSE OF THIS HOAX IS TO BE DISCOVERED TO DISCREDIT THE ENTIRE "ROSWELL INCIDENT" FILE!

The author notes that the rumor and release of the film occurred between the failure of the USAF report and the publication of the GAO's conclusions (September 1994 / July 1995). The GAO's investigation revealed that all documents related to the Roswell incident had been systematically destroyed, constituting a proof by default. While not confirming ufologists' theories, it suggests a mystery surrounding Roswell and that Colonel Jesse Marcel's account was truthful. However, to advance the case, public opinion is needed. If the public mistakenly links the fake autopsy film with the credibility of the Roswell file, the incident would be "buried a second time." Ufologists now face the opaque fortress of "state reason," which Sir Winston Churchill described as: "Truth is a treasure so precious that it must be hidden behind walls of lies."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of "La Gazette des Mousquetaires de l'Ufo" strongly emphasizes critical analysis of UFO-related evidence, particularly visual media. It champions skepticism towards sensational claims and highlights the potential for deliberate misinformation campaigns, especially when linked to government secrecy and national security concerns. The editorial stance is one of rigorous investigation, seeking to expose hoaxes and protect the integrity of genuine UFO research from being undermined by fabricated evidence. The magazine aims to present information in an agreeable and sincere manner, rather than merely seeking to please, and acknowledges that future content may depend on external factors.

Author: Jean-Louis Peyraut
Location: Troyes
Dates: October 1995 / July 1996