Gazette des Mousquetaires - No 72 - Momies Tridactyles

Magazine Overview

Title: La Gazette des Mousquetaires De l'Ufo
Issue: 72
Date: October 10, 2019
Theme: UFOs, Extraterrestrial Life, Ancient Mysteries

This issue of "La Gazette des Mousquetaires De l'Ufo" focuses heavily on the controversial "Momies Tridactyles" (Tridactyl Mummies) from Nazca, Peru, exploring their potential non-human origins and the ongoing debate surrounding their authenticity. The magazine also revisits the "Haravilliers case" and touches upon broader themes of ancient civilizations, extraterrestrial contact, and the nature of unexplained phenomena.

I - Les Momies tridactyles de Nazca (suite)

The issue begins with a continuation of the discussion on the Nazca mummies, referencing new information from the IKARIS review (October/November 2019, No. 11) that seems to confirm a non-human hypothesis and dismisses the idea of a "shady montage." Key characteristics highlighted include the backward-bending knee joints, similar to birds, and a comparison to the description of eagle-headed beings in the Haravilliers affair. A link is provided to the IKARIS article.

The article "Intra-terrestres - La crypte des momies tridactyles de Nazca et la légende du peuple des fourmis" connects the Nazca mummies to the legend of the "ant people," an ancient civilization said to have lived underground in a network of tunnels connecting subterranean cities. This legend, originating from the Hopi people, speaks of a long-standing friendship between the ant people and the Hopis, who mutually monitored and protected the Earth.

Jean-Claude Venturini shares his excitement about the Nazca mummy case, noting that the Haravilliers affair is also experiencing a resurgence, with potential for a significant new investigation. Gérard Deforge confirms this, stating that the Haravilliers case is "very consistent" and that he is involved in a new, exceptional investigation under strict protocol.

Daniel Hofnung reports on his meeting with Thierry Jamin, who presented evidence suggesting multiple species of beings, some resembling reptiles and transitional dinosaurs like the velociraptor. He notes a metallic prosthesis replacing a bone in the thorax of one mummy and mentions that eggs found with the mummies show developing embryos.

Further discussion on the mummies' anatomy points to ovoviviparous beings with large cranial capacity. The mummy named "Maria" is noted for its morphology and size (around 1.60 m), similar to humans, while others are smaller with different dentition. Despite presentations to the Peruvian parliament, progress is slow due to significant blockages and pressure on scientists.

Georges Metz offers a counterpoint, stating that there is no intrinsic anomaly in the hind limb anatomy of the mummies, suggesting that what appears to be a backward knee is actually a heel positioned higher up. Jean-Claude Venturini, however, maintains that it resembles an inverted knee compared to humans.

Patrice Galacteros agrees visually but disagrees anatomically, equating the "backward knee" to an ankle. A diagram of a bird's skeleton is provided for comparison.

Jean Claude Venturini clarifies that his comparison to "cheval" (horses) was metaphorical, meaning forced or illogical. He reiterates that for birds, the perspective differs. He compares the descriptions in texts about the mummies, which mention a heel, with the testimony of "Bruno" from the Haravilliers case.

Pierig expresses skepticism about the biomechanics of the "maria" mummies, based on his osteopathy knowledge, and requests photographic evidence of potential hoaxes, mentioning that some online sites claim the mummies are made from canid pelvises and amputated hands, with skulls showing eyes and mouths but no jaws on X-rays.

Guy Coat questions the reliability of online information, given the prevalence of disinformation, and wonders if one can truly know everything.

Pierig further elaborates on his skepticism, finding the "straight bone with a fracture as a joint guide" not viable. He questions the absence of secondary bones in the appendicular skeleton and the lack of tibiae and fibulae for rotation, leading him to suspect a hoax. However, he acknowledges that if the mummies are centuries old, a modern hoax is unlikely, raising the question of why ancient peoples would create such reduced skeletons or mutilated bodies.

Regarding the "eggs" found, Pierig dismisses their authenticity, believing an eggshell would be too thin to hide an embryo. He suggests they might be pebbles and questions the purpose behind them.

Guy Coat proposes a hypothesis that the mummies might be "dolls" made by ancient peoples for religious representation, perhaps of beings from another world. He also shares an anecdote about finding small, shell-less eggs in sand that hatched into lizards and a snake, suggesting that some natural phenomena might appear unusual.

Christelle Seval (Editions Atlante) highlights the convergence of diagnostic opinions from numerous international scientists (Peruvian, American, Russian, French) regarding the authenticity of the mummies. She questions how these specialists could all testify publicly to the reality of these beings before the Peruvian government. She criticizes a BTLV broadcast as "ridiculous" due to truncated documents and a lack of genuine results.

Pierig remains open to new evidence but stands by his current assessment based on online information and Thierry Jamin's "official" site, requesting proof of a hoax through X-rays.

Guy Coat cites David M. Jacob's book "Ils marchent parmi nous," which mentions "abductees" who saw "little greys" bathed in nourishing liquids, suggesting they might not need jaws for eating or speaking, communicating telepathically instead. He wonders if the mummies could be representations of these "little greys."

Christelle Seval relays Michel Ribardière's response, which emphasizes that if one dismisses international labs and experts as fraudulent or incompetent, then nothing can be proven. Ribardière criticizes internet users who claim to be better experts than medical professionals and radiologists, misinterpreting genetic analysis results.

Ribardière further asserts that the most compelling proof of the mummies' authenticity lies in their anatomy, which cannot be reproduced by modern labs. He points out unique features like three fingers, five or six phalanges, the absence of a kneecap (patella), and fused bones in the legs and forearms. He acknowledges that many questions remain unanswered.

Regarding the eggs, Ribardière states that the presence of a developing embryo in one is undeniable proof. He mentions molecular analyses conducted in France confirm the bodies were composed of living matter and cells. A link to the Institut Inkari Cusco's published results is provided.

Georges Metz acknowledges the information but notes the absence of "legs bent backwards" in these mummies. He asks Jean Claude Venturini for a comparison image of an ET with "bird legs."

Jean Claude Venturini states there are no ET images with bird legs but refers to Bruno's testimony from the Haravilliers investigation. He quotes Bruno's account of being in a craft, feeling an "otherworldly" presence, and being transferred to a large "Mother Ship" where he saw "giants with heads of poultry" and noted the backward bending of their legs at the knees, similar to poultry.

Bruno's thought was that he was facing "executives" who were merely "robots." The issue includes drawings by the witness M.D., which were shared by Gildas Bourdais.

II - Manipulation (Suite du n°71)

Gilles Lorant discusses "mythology" and ancient popular beliefs attributing life to neighboring planets. He contrasts this with early ufologists' views (like Adamsky) and the findings of early space probes, which indicated life was impossible. However, recent findings about Mars suggest it may have been anciently inhabited, with evidence of water flow, erosion, and bacteria. Venus is now considered a hypothetical candidate for life, with studies suggesting it could have been habitable for billions of years after its formation, despite a mysterious climate change.

Lorant questions how ancient peoples could have known about planetary conditions, suggesting the possibility of hidden knowledge, technology, or "time capsules" enabling transmission of information, linking this to myths of "ancient caves" and "contacts" with visitors from other times or dimensions.

He proposes three exploratory paths, acknowledging that a Cartesian approach might not be sufficient. He emphasizes the need to follow a line of reasoning that, while perhaps "border line" academically, is efficient for understanding.

Michel Turco offers a hypothesis that UFOs might be from survivors of a civilization that prospered in the Solar System in ancient times before a major catastrophe. This would explain many legends, myths, and religious ideologies without requiring interstellar travel or time travel.

Gilles Lorant considers the possibility of a colony of "aliens" that either prospered or caused their own "major catastrophe." He suggests that advanced civilizations might implant themselves elsewhere before disappearing. He notes that evidence of life on Mars and deductions about Venus point to millions of years ago, predating human existence.

Lorant questions how these "legends" could have been transmitted unless the civilization persisted. He wonders why such a civilization, if present, would hide and wait for technological progress. He references Asian, Indian, and Mesopotamian legends that speak of "gods" being surpassed by humans, leading to internal conflicts.

He concludes that "Sapiens-Sapiens" is prone to treachery when power is involved and that humanity's dominance over the planet is now leading to environmental destruction, potentially self-destruction.

Manipulation (Continued from No. 71)

The section "Manipulation" discusses the concept of "Schmilblick," an object that seems bizarre and imaginary, serving no purpose yet capable of anything. It relates this to UFOs, described as objects that "serve no purpose and can serve for anything."

Lorant explores the role of "chance" or "randomness," linking it to the Arabic word "al-zahr" (luck, dice) and the Latin "alea jacta est" (the dice are cast). He contrasts this with the deterministic view of classical mechanics, highlighting the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics, where electrons are not localized but exist with a probability of being observed.

He notes that while quantum mechanics allows for the calculation of probabilities, it cannot pinpoint an electron's exact location at a given moment. However, he emphasizes the predictive power of quantum physics in understanding large-scale systems governed by "chaotic or quantum randomness," citing the example of mobile phones.

The issue then references a testimony from the previous issue (No. 71) about the link between poltergeist phenomena, "demonic manifestations," and UFO contact/abduction programs. It suggests that entities have "multiple pleasures" and that abductees may undergo various programs, leading to complex and potentially hellish experiences for some.

It is questioned whether this is harassment to force participation in an extraterrestrial program or terrestrial authorities silencing witnesses. The text states that while individuals can be eliminated, what they represent cannot be, especially when linked to the universality of nature and individual will.

Social Elimination

The concept of "social elimination" is defined as isolating an individual through discredit and the suppression of their economic means. The goal is to prevent anyone from forming a regular relationship with the targeted person. This form of harassment aims to prevent the victim from identifying the perpetrator, lest they be accused of delusion, paranoia, or schizophrenia. Social elimination is typically employed by those in power when an individual is perceived as a threat to public order, either passively or actively, and refuses to accept their authority.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the fringes of ufology, presenting controversial theories and evidence with a mix of enthusiasm and critical analysis. The editorial stance appears to favor open-mindedness towards unexplained phenomena, particularly concerning the Nazca mummies and the Haravilliers case, while also acknowledging the need for scientific rigor and the possibility of hoaxes or misinterpretations. The recurring themes include the nature of extraterrestrial life, ancient mysteries, the limitations of current scientific understanding, and the potential for disinformation and manipulation in the field.

This issue of "La Gazette des Mousquetaires de l'Ufo" (Issue No. 72, dated October 10, 2019) focuses on the complex and often hidden mechanisms of psychological harassment and social exclusion. The magazine explores how these tactics are employed, particularly in the context of modern society, and touches upon related phenomena such as UFO sightings and contemporary conspiracy theories.

The Hermetic Nature of Harassment

The article begins by highlighting the hermetic nature of certain symbolic forms of harassment, making it difficult for the victim to complain or even discuss their situation without appearing irrational. This deliberate obscurity is employed by the perpetrators to ensure their methods remain undetected.

Stages of Social Elimination and 'Blacklisting'

The initial stages of social elimination are described as similar to 'recruitment' processes, starting with the deprivation of economic resources. This involves job loss through manipulation or other interventions, followed by an inability to find new employment due to constant surveillance. The article introduces the concept of 'blacklisting' as a deliberate economic exclusion, a term that literally means 'to put on a black list.' This process is facilitated by the reliance on the internet, phone, and mail for job seeking, allowing manipulators to intercept or interfere with these efforts.

Psychological Warfare and the Reptilian Brain

Beyond economic deprivation and communication surveillance, the magazine details various harassment methods designed to wear down the target's nerves and force them into a state of 'act or be silent.' This psychological warfare is rooted in scientific understanding of how living beings with a central nervous system react to aggression. The human response is typically a defense mechanism, either passive or active. Lacking natural passive defenses like some animals, humans resort to action, even if the outcome is uncertain. The human capacity for intelligence allows for a delayed response, assessing threats and waiting for a more opportune moment to retaliate. However, the article notes that few individuals possess the sustained psychological and intellectual strength to delay their response indefinitely, especially when faced with overwhelming anger.

The text explains that in modern civilized society, aggressive defense can lead to legal sanctions, such as charges for assault. Nevertheless, everyone, regardless of intelligence or education, is susceptible to this defense mechanism because it stems from a 'prefabricated impulse' originating from the 'reptilian brain.' This ancient part of the brain, also known as the 'primitive, archaic, or primary brain,' is estimated to be around 400 million years old, dating back to the era when fish evolved into amphibians.

The Reptilian Brain and Manipulation Techniques

This understanding of the reptilian brain forms the basis for manipulation and harassment techniques. Perpetrators aim to provoke violent or impulsive reactions, using these as stepping stones in a social elimination process. The article suggests that these actions, described as 'indirect passive' tactics, serve various purposes, including economic, industrial, sociological, cultural, political, and strategic protection, or even 'foreign action to hide from the population or force collaboration.'

A Testimony of Attempted Murder

A brief, disturbing testimony is included about an attempted murder by a girl described as psychologically disturbed and possibly possessing multiple personalities. Her chilling words, "go ahead kill me, it would be an honor for us," spoken in a voice not her own, highlight the psychological manipulation involved.

Manipulation of Delinquent Youth

When a target proves resilient, manipulators may resort to one of their most formidable techniques: the manipulation of gangs of young delinquents. These youths, often lacking education and future prospects, are easily controlled. Their known criminal histories, residences, and tendencies make them predictable targets for police. Furthermore, their past offenses provide leverage, as threats of imprisonment or loss of social aid and housing can compel their cooperation. In return for collaboration, manipulators ensure that minor transgressions are overlooked.

The method involves a manipulator posing as an influential figure, approaching a young delinquent with an 'interesting opportunity.' The goal is to convince the youths to occupy a specific location, such as an apartment building entrance, for extended periods. This presence is intended to destabilize the target, who is often unable to rationally explain why these youths are congregating in their vicinity when other, more suitable locations exist. The article notes that authorities often fail to intervene, even when drug use and vandalism are evident. The target may eventually believe the youths are specifically there to torment them, exacerbating their psychological distress.

The article emphasizes that this situation is designed to drive the target to madness or suicide, or to force them into compliance. It suggests that extraterrestrial or other entities may not intervene because the situation is too dangerous to officially acknowledge, fearing a public reaction that could be widespread, vigorous, panicked, or could expose vulnerabilities to potential 'invasions of entities.'

Reader Contributions

Two reader comments are included:

• Gérard Deforge (October 3, 2019) comments on a previous issue (No. 71), mentioning his interest in the Q Anon affair and a discovery about a "mafia of horror" at the "roof of the world." He expresses concern about the naivety of even informed individuals regarding global power structures.
• Gilles Lorant (October 8, 2019) discusses a conversation about UFO sightings, referencing a couple from Paraguay or Uruguay who reported seeing UFOs. He contrasts this with the perceived greater noise surrounding the topic in North America, attributing it to commercial and political manipulation rather than genuine signals. He also recalls a conversation about "steep paths that smelled of hazelnuts."

Editorial Stance and Closing

The magazine concludes with a statement about its mission: "La Gazette, through direct and collective representation, strives to make things pleasant and non-symbolic, aiming to be sincere rather than pleasing." The future of the publication is uncertain, with a note that "The continuation does not necessarily depend on our will." The issue ends with "See you in the next issue... maybe? But it's not certain..."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of "La Gazette des Mousquetaires de l'Ufo" consistently explores themes of psychological manipulation, social control, and the hidden forces that influence individuals and society. The editorial stance appears to be one of exposing these mechanisms, encouraging critical thinking, and maintaining sincerity in its reporting, even while acknowledging the uncertain future of the publication itself. The recurring theme is the analysis of covert operations designed to control or eliminate individuals, often leveraging psychological vulnerabilities and societal structures.