Gazette des Mousquetaires - No 41 - C'en est t'y ou c'en est t'y pas

Magazine Overview

Title: La Gazette des Mousquetaires De l'Ufo
Issue: Numéro 41
Date: June 15, 2017
Type: Magazine focused on UFO phenomena and related discussions.

Article 1: Is 'La Gazette de l'Ufo' Worth Publishing?

This section addresses the value and purpose of publishing 'La Gazette de l'Ufo'. Gilles Durand from SCEAU archives Ovnis argues strongly in favor, stating it's useful because it compiles exchanges that would otherwise be lost. He likens electronic messages to being volatile and easily discarded, making the Gazette a crucial archival effort. Durand shares his personal experience of archiving over 47,000 messages since 2001. He also references Gilles Thomas's project 'Les Mémoires de l'Ufologie pour les générations futures,' which aims to collect memories from ufologists of past decades, noting that SCEAU is a partner in this endeavor. Other ufologists like Antonio Ribera, Jacques Vallée, and Aimé Michel are mentioned for similar archival work through published correspondence. The author emphasizes that this work is valuable for the future.

Jean Louis Lagneau from LDLN also contributes, expressing his commitment to serious ufological information and his willingness to help the Gazette, despite his self-proclaimed laziness. He highlights the need for contributions, ideas, and support, noting the difficult times for those interested in the field. He mentions receiving a message from Christel Seval of Éditions Atlantes. The text reflects on the nature of information, describing it as demanding, capricious, manipulative, and sometimes deceptive, absorbing both truths and falsehoods. It calls for making a difference by presenting convictions with enthusiasm, even if it agitates skeptics. The author concludes with a call to action, encouraging participation to keep the Gazette alive, acknowledging that legends and authorities may not always help in understanding these phenomena.

Article 2: If it is, we don't quite know what it is...

This section, subtitled 'car trop souvent on se trompe ou on est trompé' (because too often we are mistaken or deceived), refers to the cover photo. The photo, taken at night with a mobile phone, shows a bizarre red ball, which was later identified as a beacon from a telephone transmitter on a hill near a small aerodrome. A daytime photo taken with a telephoto lens from the same location confirmed this. The witness is described as sincere.

Discussion on Denis Dorion's Video

MyrBel shares a video by Denis Dorion, filmed at Col de Vence in May 2017, which shows a UFO crossing the frame. The object was not visible to the naked eye but became apparent during video editing. A YouTube link is provided.

Jacky Kozan comments that while the video is well-made, the area around Col de Vence is known for numerous birds, often heard but not seen. He suggests that small spots in photos could be birds or insects. Having photographed birds in flight himself for comparison with 'invisible craft' images, Kozan concludes that the object in the video is clearly a bird. He provides annotated images from the video showing parts like the beak, head, wings, and abdomen.

Gilles Lorant analyzes the video, noting the post-production effects like reframing and sound. He initially considered it could be an insect but leans towards it being a bird, though he admits he lacks the scientific knowledge to be certain. He discusses the concept of a 'vortex' and a 'stargate' phenomenon, suggesting a temporal singularity or a mirror-like view of the same place in another time. He posits that the 'flying object' might not be a material entity but a 'geometrization' of a real craft elsewhere, possibly a form of bilocation. He describes the semi-materialization as having no inertia and only photonic interference, suggesting it's a transformation of spatial coordinates into time coordinates, a 'ghost' whose movements are tied to celestial dynamics, manipulated by an intelligence.

Lorant further questions if the object is 'inhabited,' suggesting it might be a 'prosthesis' for a spirit whose body is elsewhere. He also speculates about a possible base in the region, linked to a natural singularity exploited technologically. He mentions a past incident where an 'wreckage' was found after an object's accidental materialization during an electrical storm.

He then addresses Myriam, stating that while the video is interesting, it requires more expert opinions. He acknowledges that the probability of it being a bird is high, but he is not entirely certain. He points out that a bird needs to flap its wings vigorously to gain speed from a standstill, which doesn't seem to be the case with the object's apparent flight. He suggests that the object's sustained flight configuration, similar to a banked airplane, might be for increased lift, which would decrease speed. He also notes that the object's apparent rotation around the narrator could be explained by it hunting small prey like mosquitoes or rodents. He interprets the point emerging from the bush as a plausible explanation for the bird's takeoff.

Patrice Galacteros states he sees only a blurry spot and questions if software could correct the blur caused by speed. He concludes he cannot identify it as a bird or a saucer.

Gilles Lorant, in response to Myriam, reiterates that the video shows an insect or bird passing in front of the camera. He notes that the relative speed of the insect appears even greater than the 'craft.' He questions how the observer could estimate the size of the 'craft' if they didn't see it. He also points out that the cameraman stated he didn't see the object with his naked eye, only on video. Lorant emphasizes that objective analysis should focus on measurable, independent events, not just the observer's testimony, which can be biased.

Georges Metz compares the situation to hunting, suggesting that indiscriminate shooting (like chasing everything that moves) or waiting for specific prey both often yield no results. He questions the visitor's true motivation at Col de Vence.

Jean Claude Venturini introduces Pierre Dauchin, who witnessed two large triangles on April 18, 2015, and narrated his experience in a book titled 'OVNIS: Parcours d'un témoin de l'impossible.' He recommends the book, noting it's well-written and inexpensive, suggesting it be distributed to gendarmeries and GEIPAN.

Article 3: They remained on the 'Ki', as Popeck would say...

This section, with a parenthetical remark about interrogations, seems to be a brief closing or transitional statement, followed by a comment from Gérard Deforge.

Article 4: Political and Social Commentary

This section discusses a debate about a book concerning discoveries at Bucegi, mentioning ancient technologies and political aspects. The author notes finding corroborating information and credibility, linking it to the 'Roswell Children' phenomenon. It then delves into the perceived influence of Freemasons and the Illuminati on a new government, with many figures allegedly from ENA and members of the Bildeberg group. The author expresses concern about a 'unbridled globalization' project being accelerated by this government. They question whether planned measures will be implemented before legislative elections and predict a significant political and social upheaval.

Gilles Lorant offers a cautionary note about the internet being a marketplace of ideas, where one can find confirmation for any belief. He then discusses the alleged role of Freemasonry in historical events like the Romanian dictator's overthrow and past French revolutions, suggesting they are not neutral in history. He warns against simplistic responses from media or independent writers, highlighting that ENA graduates are often solicited by Bildeberg, an organization aiming to influence global affairs outside official channels. He questions the nature of their discreet meetings and their potential impact on the future of nations.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently focuses on UFO phenomena, eyewitness accounts, and the analysis of evidence, often with a skeptical yet open-minded approach. There's a strong emphasis on archival efforts and preserving information within the ufology community. The editorial stance appears to encourage critical thinking, detailed analysis, and the sharing of diverse perspectives, even when dealing with controversial or difficult-to-explain subjects. The publication also touches upon broader societal and political themes when they intersect with UFOlogy or perceived hidden influences.

Title: La Gazette de l'Ufo
Issue: n°41
Date: 15/06/2017
Focus: This issue of La Gazette de l'Ufo delves into a mix of political commentary, apocalyptic predictions, and in-depth ufological investigations, particularly concerning the Roswell incident.

Political Commentary: Macron's Early Days

The issue opens with a commentary on Emmanuel Macron's presidency, noting the intense scrutiny he faced from his peers regarding his 'manipulative' political strategies. The author suggests that Macron's actions are consistent with the ideas he presented, aiming to implement reforms swiftly, possibly through ordinances, to address France's high unemployment rate, which is attributed to a lack of deep reforms. The text acknowledges that this approach might bypass parliamentary processes but justifies it as an exceptional measure for exceptional times. There's a speculative mention of Freemasons potentially influencing government actions during crucial moments, a point raised by a correspondent named Gérard. The article also touches upon Macron's relatively unknown status prior to his presidency and the need to observe his actions over time, anticipating challenges during his five-year term.

Apocalyptic Predictions: Planet X and the End of the World

A significant section of the magazine is dedicated to the prediction of an impending apocalypse in October 2017. This theory, popularized by David Meade's book "Planète X: L'arrivée 2017," posits that an unknown planet will collide with Earth, causing widespread destruction. The article cites Meade's claims about increased earthquakes, intensified storms, and the elite preparing for survival. Robert Vicino, an entrepreneur, is quoted as confirming the event's certainty and its biblical parallels. The text also mentions Jehovah's Witnesses distributing literature on the 'Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,' framing it as a means to capture the attention of the impressionable. The discussion is framed within the context of occupying people's minds, especially after the 2012 doomsday predictions failed to materialize.

Ufology: Roswell and Beyond

The magazine features a substantial discussion on the Roswell incident, highlighting the book "Les enfants de Roswell" by Thomas J. Carey and Donald R. Schmitt. The authors are presented as leading investigators who claim to have irrefutable proof of the facts, including alleged death threats from the US government to child witnesses to maintain secrecy. The article suggests that these testimonies, which have been suppressed for decades, will challenge 'debunkers.'

Correspondent Christel Seval expresses that the mail from Jean-Claude provides some moral support. The discussion then broadens to the general effort in France to translate and publish foreign ufological books, a field largely neglected until 2017. It is noted that no American investigation into Roswell had been translated into French before this initiative. The challenges of publishing such works are discussed, including the cost of rights and translation, and the perceived 'timidity' or refusal of the French public to engage with these topics. The magazine emphasizes the importance of using documented sources and firsthand accounts rather than hearsay.

Key Themes and Discussions

Several correspondents engage in a dialogue about these topics:

• Gilles Lorant discusses the 'three fundamental factors for the emergence of unexplained phenomena': the observer, specific locations, and temporal cycles. He also critically analyzes the Planet X theory, pointing out the lack of detectable evidence from satellites and the immense speed required for such a planet to reach Earth's vicinity by November.
• Gilles Lorant also expresses his personal struggles with the Roswell subject, finding many books unconvincing but acknowledging the potential of Christel Seval's translation work to provide real-life sources.
• Jean Pierre Petit's work is also discussed. While some find his book to be largely repetitive, his cosmological model JANUS and his theories on spatial displacement are mentioned. There's a note about waiting for his reaction to scientific findings from 'Gardenteapot' mentioned in his book 'Ummo l'avertissement.'
• Christel Seval outlines his publishing philosophy, stating he no longer polices thought and aims to publish works he agrees with or finds phase. He acknowledges his lack of strong opinion on Roswell but trusts Carey and Schmitt's expertise. He mentions the upcoming publication of "The Aztec UFO incident," described as 'Roswell 2,' and Jacobs' book "Walking among us" on abductees, despite differing interpretations.
• Jean Claude Venturini shares his experience meeting ufologist/author Jean Sider and expresses his openness to publishing good subjects, provided they are based on tangible facts.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently emphasizes the importance of documented evidence and rigorous research in ufology, contrasting it with unsubstantiated claims and 'coffee shop' discussions. There's a recurring theme of the French public's skepticism and lack of engagement with ufological topics, which hinders the dissemination of important translated works. The editorial stance appears to be one of promoting serious investigation into unexplained phenomena, encouraging critical thinking, and providing a platform for translated research that might otherwise be inaccessible to a French audience. The publication of works on Roswell, Aztec, and abductees, alongside discussions on political events and apocalyptic theories, reflects a broad interest in challenging conventional narratives and exploring the unknown.