Gazette des Mousquetaires - No 38 - La Fete Ufo continue

Magazine Overview

This issue of "La Gazette de l'Ufo" (Issue 38, dated January 19, 2017) is presented as a collector's edition, priced at 10€, and features the title "LUMIÈRES DIURNES LUMIÈRES NOCTURNES." The cover art depicts a nighttime scene with silhouetted figures observing a landed disc-shaped UFO and a smaller object in the sky.

Roswell Debate: Disinformation and Multiple Crashes

The issue opens with a discussion thread initiated by "@Magonia" on December 23, 2016, responding to an article by Gildas Bourdais. The core of the discussion revolves around the Roswell incident and the possibility of disinformation. James questions the logic behind the US authorities allegedly hiding a 'true' extraterrestrial crash behind other, less documented crashes, especially if they occurred in the same region. He cites Stan Friedman's involvement and suggests Victorio Peak in New Mexico as a potential crash site. Gildas Bourdais, in response, acknowledges the prevalence of disinformation operations concerning Roswell. He discusses the "amplifying disinformation" theory and dismisses the story of Colonel French about a saucer being shot down by an electromagnetic weapon as "integral garbage." Bourdais also questions James about the location of three crash sites mentioned in the MJ-12 documents, noting that several MJ-12 documents are considered false.

James, on January 1, 2017, clarifies that he based his suggestions on Gildas's indications and that Victorio Peak is indeed visible on Google Earth, near sensitive military installations. He posits that multiple crashes in New Mexico in 1947 are plausible given the UFO sightings in Europe and the USSR at the time, and the presence of secret research sites in the US. He speculates that the US authorities might have ordered the downing of unknown craft, questioning the feasibility of an electromagnetic weapon in 1947 but acknowledging the existence of radar.

Gildas Bourdais, on January 2, 2017, expresses skepticism about the San Augustin crash site, citing the unreliability of its main witness, Gerald Anderson, who he labels a "big liar." He contrasts this with the numerous credible witnesses for the Roswell crash. Bourdais argues that the San Augustin story, which he believes was a deliberate disinformation campaign, destabilized the Roswell case. He also mentions that he is working on a book that will address this and other related affairs.

James, on January 2, 2017, probes further into the logic of disinformation, questioning what purpose a second crash revelation would serve, especially since the ufological community had already accepted the reality of the first Roswell crash. He wonders about the beneficiaries and the reasons behind such disinformation, suggesting it implies a higher level of national security concern.

Gildas Bourdais, on January 2, 2017, reiterates his doubts about the San Augustin crash, highlighting Anderson's inconsistent testimony and the controversy it generated. He concludes that there is no serious proof of a second crash and that such hypotheses have served to destabilize the Roswell case. He also mentions that he is revising a chapter on this topic for a new book.

Ummites: Warnings of Global Collapse

Georges Metz, on December 29, 2016, recommends the book "UMMO, l'avertissement" by Stone Gardenteapot, which follows Christel Seval's "UMMO, Un Dieu venu d'ailleurs." The book reportedly contains scientific and profound content, detailing communications from enigmatic individuals called the Ummites. These communications, sent globally via computer networks, are presented as vital information to help civilization avoid a catastrophic future. The Ummites' warnings include the collapse of the global economy between 2019 and 2022, a globalized civil war, and mass migration from poorer countries seeking refuge. The book also discusses the potential for extraterrestrial intervention in case of nuclear conflict. Metz notes that the author, Stone Gardenteapot, is a screenwriter, director, and writer who has studied the UMMO dossier for over 25 years.

Gilles Lorant, on December 30, 2016, acknowledges the book but admits to having little time for such literature. However, he finds the economic scenario described as probable, even conservative. He elaborates on the societal aspects, drawing parallels with mass reactions during shortages or sales, and predicts that a week without food supply in Rungis would quickly turn the Paris region into an urban jungle. He describes young professionals stockpiling food and weapons, preparing for a difficult period ahead, and notes a growing fear of the future across Western countries.

Christel Seval, on January 1, 2017, adds that recent indications from the Ummites suggest the time for action is near, marked by the dollar equaling or exceeding the euro, and a massive devaluation of the Yuan, signaling an unexpected economic crash.

Historical UFO Sightings and French Ufology

Michel Turco, on December 22, 2016, discusses a Russian-language video that touches upon UFO mysteries. He highlights a segment at the 23-minute mark describing an engine built in 1922 with three rotating discs creating a magnetic field and antigravity effect, noting similarities to some ufological testimonies. Another segment at 27 minutes mentions Soviet generals witnessing a disk during the Battle of Koursk in July/August 1943, linking this to the testimony of August Wörner.

The issue includes a photo of a German "Bellonzo" disk, reportedly from a video. It details August Wörner's account of witnessing UFOs engaging with tanks near Orel in July 1943 and later observing a flying object over Moscow in July 1946. Following his release from captivity, Wörner became interested in ufology and established a UFO database in the Koblenz region.

Gilles Lorant, on November 16, 2016, brings attention to a new ufological presence in Valensole, France, mentioning the publication "Ovni en France- La vérité" by Serje Perronet. Georges Metz, on the same date, comments on this new competitor, noting that Perronet published his work through Cercles Ufologiques and referencing Metz's own book, "OVNIS en France." Metz expresses a sense of confusion in the ufological landscape.

Marc Bethmont, on November 17, 2016, states his commitment to the "Ovnis Paris" association and his trust in a small group of serious ufologists, including Gérard Deforge, Jean Claude Venturini, and Georges Metz.

Guy Coat, on November 17, 2016, discusses Serje Perronet's relocation and the passionate, sometimes divisive, nature of ufological debates. He advocates for focusing on the core truth of ufology and avoiding personal attacks or unsubstantiated judgments. Coat also notes the decline of UFO activity in the Occitanie region, except for Toulouse, and mentions a past incident involving a large international company that negatively impacted regional UFO organizations.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of "La Gazette de l'Ufo" demonstrates a continued focus on the Roswell incident, presenting various perspectives on disinformation and witness reliability. The Ummites phenomenon is highlighted as a source of serious warnings about future global crises, blending ufology with socio-economic and geopolitical analysis. The magazine also engages with historical UFO cases and the evolving landscape of ufological research in France. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, encouraging readers to examine evidence, question official narratives, and consider the broader implications of UFO phenomena and global events. There is a clear emphasis on the importance of rigorous research and a skepticism towards unsubstantiated claims, while acknowledging the complexity and potential significance of the UFO subject.

Title: La Gazette de l'Ufo
Issue: n°38
Date: January 19, 2017
Publisher: La Gazette de l'Ufo
Country: France
Language: French

This issue of La Gazette de l'Ufo, dated January 19, 2017, delves into a variety of topics related to ufology, the paranormal, consciousness, and emerging scientific concepts. The content is primarily a collection of forum discussions and contributions from various individuals, offering diverse perspectives on these subjects.

Discussions on UFO Groups and Reality

The issue begins with a discussion about preferred UFO investigation groups, with a preference for those that are independent and open-minded, citing "Ovni Paris" as an example of a group that is "libertarian." This leads to reflections on the nature of reality, with comparisons to Plato's cave and the idea of reality being composed of "Russian dolls" or layers of information.

Biological Transmutation and New Physics

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the topic of biological transmutation, referencing a recent discovery by Russian chemists. These scientists have reportedly achieved the transmutation of chemical elements using bacteria, accelerating radioactive decay. The process, which started in 1998 and achieved repeatable results in 2013, involves transforming radioactive materials like uranium ore or nuclear waste into other elements, such as iron transforming into chromium. This discovery is presented as a revolutionary scientific event that challenges current physics and has been patented by the inventors. The discussion also draws parallels to the work of Louis Kervran, who explored biological transmutations, and touches upon alchemical concepts, suggesting that ancient traditions might hold keys to understanding these phenomena.

Personal Experiences and Phenomena

Contributors share personal experiences, including a detailed account of sleep paralysis by Robert Lortal, who has experienced it numerous times since the age of 22. He describes the sensation of being conscious but unable to move, accompanied by an auditory phenomenon (a persistent whistling in his left ear) that intensifies when he tries to move. Gérard Deforge also mentions a persistent whistling sound he has heard since childhood. The issue also briefly touches upon the phenomenon of "salt" in relation to abductees and the "boules" case.

Critiques of Official UFO Investigations

There is a strong critique of the French official UFO investigation body, GEIPAN. The author expresses anger at GEIPAN's perceived lack of progress and engagement with significant UFO cases, such as the "Trans-en-Provence" affair and the cases of Haravilliers and Robert. The magazine suggests that these organizations remain "impassive" despite the efforts to gather data on these extraordinary phenomena.

Other Topics

Other discussions include the potential for extraterrestrial interaction, the concept of "mental interactions" as an alternative to the extraterrestrial hypothesis, and the idea that visitors might be concerned about humanity's readiness for advanced knowledge. The issue also references a book by Philippe Palem titled "Voyage dans les mondes obscurs" and a video on biological transmutation.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the exploration of phenomena that challenge conventional scientific understanding, including UFOs, paranormal experiences, and biological transmutation. There is a clear skepticism towards official institutions that are perceived as resistant to new ideas. The editorial stance appears to favor open-mindedness, the integration of ancient knowledge with modern science, and the pursuit of research that expands our understanding of reality and consciousness. The contributors often engage in speculative discussions, linking diverse phenomena and seeking underlying principles that connect them.

This issue of "La Gazette de l'Ufo" (n°38), dated January 19, 2017, focuses heavily on the controversial Cergy-Pontoise UFO case. The magazine presents a collection of articles, comments, and documents that revisit the events, challenge official conclusions, and explore the broader implications for ufology. The issue features contributions from various individuals, including ufologists, witnesses, and commentators, fostering a debate on the nature of the case and the handling of UFO information.

The Cergy-Pontoise Case: A Re-examination

The central theme of this issue is the re-examination of the Cergy-Pontoise case, which occurred in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The magazine highlights new documents and testimonies that contradict the widely accepted conclusion that the case was a hoax. Gérard Deforge, in particular, presents complementary elements and a gendarmerie report, emphasizing the importance of presenting a complete dossier rather than selective evidence.

Several commentators, including Jacques Vallée and Patrice Galacteros, engage in a discussion about the case. While some, like Patrice Seray, maintain the 'hoax' conclusion, others, such as Jacques Vallée, suggest that Franck Fontaine, the primary witness, may not have been involved in a hoax but rather experienced something genuinely unusual, even if not an extraterrestrial abduction. The debate touches upon the difficulty of distinguishing between truth and fabrication, and the role of personal conviction versus objective evidence.

Information and Disinformation

A significant portion of the discussion revolves around the manipulation of information and the role of official bodies and media in shaping public perception. The GEPAN (Groupe d'Études des Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non Identifiés) is heavily criticized for its alleged 'debunking' efforts and for spreading 'lies' about the Cergy-Pontoise case. Jean Claude Bourret is also mentioned as having propagated these narratives. Marie Thérèse de Brosses, author of a book on alien abductions, is cited for relying on GEPAN's conclusions and dismissing the Cergy-Pontoise case as a mystification.

Contributors express frustration with the selective presentation of evidence and the tendency to dismiss UFO phenomena without thorough investigation. The issue underscores the challenge of uncovering the truth when official narratives are perceived as biased or intentionally misleading.

Witness Testimonies and New Evidence

New testimonies and documents are presented to support the idea that the Cergy-Pontoise case is more complex than a simple hoax. Muriel Lefevre's account of a sighting on August 15, 1980, describes a bright, star-like object with a blue halo that exhibited unusual movements and transformations. This testimony, along with others, is presented as evidence that contradicts the 'canular' theory.

Franck Fontaine's own account, though not fully detailed in this excerpt, is central to the debate. The issue suggests that Fontaine may not have been a willing participant in a hoax but rather a genuine witness whose experience was perhaps not fully understood or reported accurately.

Broader Ufological Context

The discussion extends beyond the Cergy-Pontoise case to broader themes in ufology. Contributors reflect on the nature of skepticism, the importance of open-minded investigation, and the challenges faced by ufologists. The concept of 'consciousness' is also introduced as a potential factor in understanding the universe and UFO phenomena.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include the debate between skepticism and belief, the critical examination of official narratives, the importance of witness testimonies, and the challenges of uncovering truth in the field of ufology. The editorial stance appears to favor a more thorough and open-minded investigation of UFO phenomena, questioning the premature dismissal of cases like Cergy-Pontoise as mere hoaxes. The magazine encourages a critical approach to information and a willingness to consider alternative explanations beyond conventional scientific or official accounts.