Gazette des Mousquetaires - No 36 - Mystere sur l'Aveyron

Magazine Overview

Title: La Gazette de l'Ufo
Issue Date: December 15, 2016
Cover Headline: Mystère sur l'Aveyron (Mystery over Aveyron)

This issue of La Gazette de l'Ufo, number 36, published on December 15, 2016, by Gwion Coat ar Roc'h, delves into a mysterious event that occurred in Aveyron, France, on June 15, 1966, around 9 PM.

I - Credo Quia Absurdum - I believe it because it is absurd, just like what follows:

The editorial section, titled "Credo Quia Absurdum," sets a tone of embracing the bizarre and the unexplained. The author posits that the literary value of a report is tied to its sincerity and documentary value. The piece reflects on the nature of UFO phenomena, acknowledging their often nonsensical appearance and indecipherable technology. The author expresses a personal commitment to gathering information, even from seemingly absurd accounts, and criticizes "false skeptics" and intellectual dishonesty. The experience of witnessing such phenomena is described as isolating and difficult to communicate, often leading to misunderstanding and judgment. The author emphasizes that while the experience can be traumatic, it ultimately strengthens the individual. The difficulty in accepting such accounts is attributed to their contradictory and incredible nature, which clashes with the everyday understanding of reality. The piece also touches upon the idea of superior knowledge guiding humanity and the indispensable role of ordinary people in societal progress.

The Aveyron Incident of June 15, 1966

The core of the issue revolves around an event that took place in Aveyron on June 15, 1966, at approximately 9:30 PM. The initial report comes from a letter by Guy Coat, who was prompted to write after seeing an article in the publication LDLN that echoed a story told by his wife's cousin, André U., in the 1960s. André U. recounted an experience where he saw luminescent balls, described as large, glowing pearls about a meter in height, floating close to the ground. He was frightened and reported it to his friend's father. Upon returning to the location, they saw the balls again. The father used a flashlight to signal, causing the balls to disappear in a bright flash. André U. reportedly suffered from slight burns on his face and significant psychological trauma.

Guy Coat expresses his belief in André U.'s account and notes that many people who were aware of the incident later seemed to have forgotten the details, including the identity of André's friend and his parents. He also mentions that André U. once told him, "if you want, one evening, we'll go back there and you'll see... I just have to call them..."

Another correspondent, writing on April 27, 2006, also recounts being intrigued by an article about the Aveyron balls in LDLN. This correspondent, after a personal mishap that led them to the article, found a striking resemblance to the story told by their wife's cousin in the 1960s. They mention Didier Gomez, who was investigating UFOs in the Tarn region and had published a book. This correspondent had previously shared information with Didier Gomez, who had sent them a comic book about a similar affair. The correspondent laments the loss of their own archives and investigations due to the sudden death of André U. in 1993 and expresses a desire to contact Georges Metz to see if he knew André U.

Investigation and Eyewitness Accounts

The magazine presents excerpts from an investigation conducted by an LDLN team, including Messieurs Chasseigne, Dupin de la Guérinière, Lagarde, and Canourgues. The investigation focused on a farm in Aveyron, built in 1766, where a family of four lived. The primary witness was the 76-year-old grandmother, who alerted the family from her upstairs window.

She described seeing "fires" that appeared, disappeared, and moved, describing them as large, about three times the size of a man's head. She noted they were not illuminating the surroundings but were intensely bright. The lights approached the farm, moving from about 1 km away to closer distances, eventually descending towards a small stream. She expressed fear that they might cause a fire. Her grandson, the father, also witnessed the phenomenon. He described seeing a ball about 15 meters from the house, which remained immobile for a few minutes before disappearing. He later saw more balls, described as round, slightly flattened at the bottom, and about 1.20 meters in height. He noted they moved slowly, like a tractor in first gear, and were luminous.

During the observation, the witness and his son saw six luminous balls moving in a line, contouring the area. They were described as luminous but not illuminating the ground, and no heat was detected. The son estimated the size of one object to be around 1.20 meters. The father recounted that the object followed him for about 50 meters as he tried to pass behind the house, and it stopped when he did. He described it as being about 1.50 meters in diameter and white, but not illuminating. The object then returned towards the house.

Later, the son saw the object again, and the father confirmed its return. The son mentioned seeing an "obus" (shell) which he had seen before. The father confirmed seeing it too. The luminous objects were described as being the same color as the balls and were seen joining a larger object, referred to as "Ce machin là" (This thing there).

Further Manifestations and Investigations

The issue also details subsequent events. It is established that nothing significant occurred until January 6, 1967, after which a series of remarkable and precise events took place until January 11, 1967. Vague, undated events continued until 1969. Investigators Chasseigne and Canourgues worked to understand these manifestations. A letter from Chasseigne to Lagarde in May 1970 suggests that many facts appeared as "flashes" in conversations, and that the father had seen a ball before June 15, and the grandmother had seen one afterward.

The mother of the family, who had not spoken much, was interviewed. She recalled seeing lights but was myopic and didn't remember details. The father mentioned that the lights came more than fifteen times, with one approaching twice. The grandmother recalled an incident where she thought there was a fire. The father confirmed that the lights came near the house twice and that one had blocked his path. He also mentioned seeing a ball in the sky later, possibly in 1969.

On January 6, 1967, the father went out to check on the livestock and saw a light about 50 meters away, then closer, about 3 meters from the house. He called his son, and they investigated. The father described being followed by the object for about 50 meters. He estimated its size at 1.50 meters in diameter, white, and luminous but not illuminating. The object then returned towards the house. The son also saw the object and mentioned the "obus." The objects were described as luminous and joining the larger "machin."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently emphasizes the importance of eyewitness testimony and the challenges of investigating unexplained phenomena. The editorial stance appears to be one of open-mindedness and a belief in the sincerity of witnesses, even when their accounts are extraordinary or seem absurd. The publication aims to document these events and encourage further investigation, acknowledging the difficulties in gathering concrete evidence and the skepticism often faced by those who report such experiences. There's a recurring theme of personal experience shaping understanding and the idea that even seemingly insignificant details can contribute to a larger picture when pieced together.

Title: La Gazette de l'Ufo
Issue: n°36
Date: 15/12/2016
Content Type: Magazine Issue

This issue of "La Gazette de l'Ufo" (n°36) delves into the persistent mysteries surrounding the Roswell incident and the potential role of advanced technology, particularly radar, in UFO phenomena. The magazine features a collection of articles, interviews, and discussions that explore witness testimonies, historical context, and speculative theories.

Eyewitness Account: A Family's Encounter

The issue opens with a detailed transcript of a family's encounter, likely from the 1960s, involving a UFO described as "six balls" and an "obus" (shell/object) with three branches on each side. The son recounts seeing the object with a "phare" (headlight) at the top that illuminated their room. The father expresses fear and a sense of being followed. The following evening, the son reports seeing a "green-blue light" and the "obus" again with his father, suggesting a recurring phenomenon.

The Roswell Incident: New Revelations and Debates

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the Roswell incident, revisiting the events of 1947. Lieutenant-colonel Richard French claims that not one, but two UFOs crashed near Roswell. He alleges that the first was shot down by an American experimental aircraft using an "electromagnetic pulse" weapon, causing the UFO's systems to fail. French's account suggests the military initially confirmed the crash but later retracted it, attributing it to a weather balloon.

This narrative is supported by other sources, including claims from former CIA agent Chase Brandon, who asserts that information about the incident was hidden in a secret CIA vault. The article also references the "MJ 12" documents, which are described as controversial but potentially containing elements of truth.

Radar Technology and UFO Crashes

Several articles explore the hypothesis that radar technology played a role in UFO crashes. Gildas Bourdais discusses the idea that a radar might have interfered with the UFO's guidance system, citing a "Briefing for the President" document from 1983 that mentions radar interference. He also notes that the idea of a radar causing the Roswell crash was discussed in the late 1990s within the context of "MJ 12" documents.

Patrice Galacteros proposes that a powerful radar transmitter, rather than a destructive weapon, could have disrupted the UFO's navigation, especially if the craft's control was telepathic. He mentions a version where radar waves were used to crash UFOs, a method that supposedly stopped working after 1947.

Historical Context: Radar Development and WWII

To provide context, the magazine includes information on the invention and development of radar. Gérard Deforge explains that radar was invented by an English scientist before the end of World War II and was crucial in combating German submarines. He also details the Enigma machine and the Allied efforts to decrypt German communications, highlighting how this intelligence advantage shortened the war.

The article also discusses the Bruneval raid (Operation Biting) in 1942, where British forces captured German radar equipment to study its technology. This section emphasizes the strategic importance of radar during WWII and its role in the Battle of Britain.

Diverse Perspectives and Skepticism

While presenting various theories, the magazine also includes skeptical viewpoints. Gildas Bourdais expresses doubt about the "electromagnetic weapons" theory, noting that such weapons were not available in 1947 and questioning the reliability of some accounts, particularly those involving multiple crashes or specific details like the shape of "bolts" on a saucer.

He questions the motivation behind reviving such stories, suggesting it might be part of a new wave of debunking efforts as the 70th anniversary of Roswell approaches. Bourdais also points out the controversy surrounding the "Briefings" for the President, suggesting they might contain false elements to maintain doubt.

Philosophical Reflections on UFOs and Society

In a more philosophical piece, Gilles Lorant reflects on the nature of UFO phenomena and human perception. He argues that debates about the specifics of UFOs, such as the shape of their components, are less important than understanding the intention behind the phenomenon. Lorant suggests that the fascination with UFOs reflects a modern tendency to attribute the inexplicable to high technology, similar to how ancient cultures attributed it to divine mystery.

He posits that both the pursuit of knowledge and the belief in the supernatural can be exploited by elites. Lorant advocates for a broader dissemination of knowledge and a focus on self-awareness and interaction with the environment as paths to understanding. He notes the increasing globalization and cultural mixing, which may lead to a more unified worldview, but also a growing fear of an uncertain future.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the enduring mystery of the Roswell incident, the technological aspects of UFO sightings (particularly radar), and the critical examination of witness testimonies and official narratives. The magazine appears to adopt a stance of open inquiry, presenting various theories and counterarguments without definitively endorsing any single explanation. It encourages readers to engage critically with the information and to consider the broader societal and psychological implications of the UFO phenomenon. The editorial stance seems to be one of encouraging continued investigation and open-mindedness, while also cautioning against uncritical acceptance of all claims.

Title: La Gazette de l'Ufo
Issue: n°36
Date: December 15, 2016

This issue of "La Gazette de l'Ufo" focuses on the alleged "Majestic 12" documents and their implications for the 1947 Roswell crash and other UFO incidents. The article presents excerpts and analyses of these documents, questioning their authenticity while exploring the details they purportedly reveal about extraterrestrial encounters and government cover-ups.

The "Majestic 12" Documents and the Roswell Incident

The article begins by referencing a statement made to the author about being easier to manipulate, linking it to a book by an "alien harvest" author. It then introduces the "Majestic 12" documents, which reportedly emerged in the 1990s and were revealed by ufologist Tim Cooper. These documents, published by Dr. Robert Wood and his son Ryan in "The Majestic Documents" (1998), are central to the discussion.

The author details a passage from his own book, "OVNIS. Vers la fin du secret" (2010), which highlights the proliferation of crash stories linked to the Roswell affair. This section outlines several key documents allegedly related to events in July 1947:

• Field Order: An instruction given in early July to a specialized unit, the "Interplanetary Phenomenon Unit (IPU)", to go to crash sites.
• IPU Summary (July 22): A seven-page document describing the discovery of two flying objects between July 4 and 6. One was found near Corona (designated LZ-1, on the Brazel ranch), and another about 30 km southwest of Socorro, near Oscura Peak (LZ-2). At LZ-2, five bodies, approximately 1.50 m tall with grey-pink skin and no hair, were found. They were described as thin, wearing fitted, fireproof suits, and having indistinct sexual characteristics. Other bodies and animal parts were found at LZ-1. Shortly after the LZ-2 discovery, four technicians became seriously ill, and three died of hemorrhage.
• General Twining's Instruction (July 8): An order for General Twining to go to White Sands to evaluate preserved UFOs.
• Twining's Report (July 16): A three-page "Air Accident Report" describing a saucer found near Victorio Peak (possibly Oscura Peak), shaped like a "donut" with a 10 m diameter. Inside, a compartment suggested a possible "atomic engine." German scientists from Fort Bliss and White Sands, including von Braun, could not identify the craft as a human secret. Oppenheimer and von Karman suggested the craft itself might be part of the propulsion system, a concept previously mentioned by Colonel Corso regarding electrical charging.
• CIG Memorandum (September 19): A one-page memo from the Central Intelligence Group (CIG), signed by Hillenkoetter, revealing a third site, 50 km east of Alamogordo (later Holloman), discovered on July 5.

Another document, a 19-page "Mission Assessment" dated September 19, uses the acronym "ULAT" for "Unidentified Lenticular Shaped Aerodyne" but inverts the locations of LZ-1 and LZ-2.

Finally, the "First annual report" of the Majestic-12 Group, dated around 1952, is mentioned. It details the ejection of a "rescue cylinder" after a collision between two interplanetary saucers, with two of the five recovered bodies inside the cylinder. The report also considers the possibility of a collision with an experimental craft, noting the fusion of three radar spots.

Risk of Disinformation and Alternative Theories

The author expresses significant skepticism about the "Majestic 12" documents, suggesting they likely mix genuine information with disinformation. He regrets that some authors, like Marc Saint-Germain (author of "Les gardiens du Silence"), do not seem to recognize this. Saint-Germain cited researcher Chuck Wade, who reportedly cataloged seven crash sites.

The article also references Lieutenant Colonel Richard French, who claimed in 2012 that one of the Roswell saucers was shot down by an experimental aircraft using "electronic pulse" weapons. French had previously been involved in debunking UFOs during the "Blue Book" era.

The author finds these accounts bordering on science fiction, likening them to "Stargate," and decides to stop his commentary on this aspect.

Reader Contributions and Perspectives

The issue includes comments from readers:

• Gilles Lorant thanks the author for his transparency and sources. He admits he has not been interested in the Roswell case due to its age and media pollution, feeling it was sensationalized. He expresses admiration for ufologists who have pursued the case from its early stages and states he feels more useful focusing on contemporary issues.
• Gilles Lorant also notes surprise that a remote area like Roswell isn't rich in local legends about UFOs, contrasting it with many remote regions in Europe, Asia, and Canada where UFO sightings and landings are reportedly common.
• He suggests expanding investigations to a 100-200 km radius around Roswell to find indigenous testimonies that could position the Roswell incident not as an isolated event but as part of a pattern, which would challenge military cover-up efforts.
• He believes that corroborating ancestral testimonies from isolated inhabitants about close encounters could provide better insight into the visitors' technological level, acknowledging the difficulty of researching this technological aspect.
• Patrice Galacteros is addressed regarding legends about UFOs, referencing books by Ardy Sixkiller about her interviews with Native American witnesses. The author expresses skepticism about these accounts but acknowledges their existence.
• Galacteros also points out that Roswell was not as remote as suggested, being the location of the first American atomic bomber base at the time of the crash.
• Another comment from Gilles Lorant indicates interest in a book that may have been purchased at a recent "Ovni-Paris" event.
• The author responds to Patrice Galacteros, suggesting he might be systematically skeptical of things he doesn't know, comparing it to his own reflex. He also notes that the installation of the strategic base near Roswell might have been relatively recent compared to the centuries of indigenous presence and storytelling.
• A friend of the author, an American living in Albi, describes Roswell as having become the "Las Vegas of New Mexico," with no traces of UFOs but plenty of plastic models of alien craft and ETs.

I. Velikovsky and Mythological Connections

The article draws a parallel between the study of UFO legends and I. Velikovsky's work on myths and legends, particularly his book "Worlds in Collision," suggesting that examining ancient stories can open new avenues of scientific inquiry.

Cover Art and Publication Details

The issue features cover art titled "Gwion Coat ar Roc'h" by an artist named "Diffusion 2016." The publication details indicate it is "La Gazette de l'Ufo" and the diffusion year is 2016.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the analysis of alleged secret government documents related to UFOs (specifically the Majestic 12 papers), the detailed examination of UFO crash incidents from 1947, and the exploration of witness testimonies. The editorial stance is one of critical inquiry, acknowledging the intriguing nature of the evidence presented while maintaining a healthy skepticism regarding its authenticity and the potential for disinformation. The article encourages further investigation into historical accounts and local legends to contextualize major UFO events.