Gazette des Mousquetaires - No 34 - Phenomenes Ufo vus hier et aujourd'hui

Magazine Overview

Title: La Gazette de l'Ufo
Issue: Numéro 34
Date: Thursday, November 24, 2016
Theme: UFO phenomena observed yesterday and today.

This issue of "La Gazette de l'Ufo" explores a variety of UFO and anomalous phenomena, blending historical accounts with contemporary investigations and scientific approaches. The cover features an illustration related to the "Michelin Men" sightings and the headline "Phénomènes Ufo vus hier et aujourd'hui" (UFO Phenomena Seen Yesterday and Today).

I - The "Michelin Men" of La Réunion (1968)

The issue begins by discussing the "Michelin Men" phenomenon, referencing a documentary "OVNI sous les tropiques" (UFOs in the Tropics) by William Cally, presented by Gilles Thomas and Luc Chastan. The case of Luc Fontaine in La Réunion on July 31, 1968, is detailed. Fontaine, a credible witness, reported seeing an oval cabin-like object suspended about 4-5 meters above the ground in a clearing. Two small figures, approximately 90 cm tall, dressed in what appeared to be Michelin Man-like suits, were observed inside. The investigation was conducted by J.P. Lavrilgrand.

Discussion on Media Coverage

Commentators Vincent Leroux, Georges Metz, and Gilles Lorant discuss the documentary. Vincent Leroux missed the broadcast due to technical issues. Georges Metz found the TV program to be more focused on the witness's reaction and the general public than on a scientific analysis of the phenomenon, deeming it more commercial than scientific. Gilles Lorant suggests that the documentary might not be the only source for this information and notes that the drawings, while not photos, offer interesting indications, recalling a testimony about a pink plasma membrane surrounding a craft.

II - The "Michelin Man" of Maubeuge (1954)

Another "Michelin Man" case is presented from Maubeuge in November 1954. The object was described as a cone-shaped craft, 2.30 to 2.40 meters in diameter, with vertical ribs. It appeared to rest on two or three feet, with traces resembling bathtub feet. An occupant, estimated to be between 1.20 and 1.40 meters tall and very wide, was observed. The figure wore a large helmet and thick boots, and its movements were slow and awkward, suggesting difficulty in moving. The witnesses did not see the craft depart.

III - The "Michelin Man" of Guidonia (1993)

On June 17, 1993, in Guidonia, Italy, two witnesses, Luciano and Mario B., observed a descending silhouette about 200 meters away. This figure was described as a compromise between the Michelin Man and a diver. Similar sightings had been reported in other Italian locations like Lirio, Rivisondoli, and Siracusa.

IV - Goethe's Strange Lights (1768)

An article by Michel Turco discusses strange lights observed by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. The account, reported in Jacques Vallée's book "Chroniques des apparitions extra-terrestres," describes an event in September 1768. While traveling near Leipzig, Goethe witnessed a phenomenon in a ravine: a brilliantly lit amphitheater with countless small lights arranged like steps. These lights were not fixed but moved erratically, creating a dazzling effect. Goethe was reluctant to examine it closely, and the postilion mentioned an old quarry nearby. The nature of the phenomenon remains undetermined, possibly related to folklore or luminous beings.

Discussion on Goethe's Observation

Gilles Lorant suggests informing Jean Pierre Troadec about this observation, as he researches historical elements that might corroborate contemporary testimonies. Lorant also proposes comparing Goethe's writings before and after 1768 to see if his perspective changed. He concludes that the event should be archived as a strange testimony without definitive proof.

V - The "Michelin Man" of Sequoia National Park (2015)

A sighting from August 9, 2015, in Sequoia National Park, USA, describes a bright, luminous white form resembling a humanoid in a suit, moving in the sky over the park. Multiple witnesses and videos reportedly confirm the anomaly, suggesting the images are not faked.

II - Publication: "Au-delà de l'impossible" by Didier van Cauwelaert

Jean Claude Venturini introduces a new book by Didier van Cauwelaert titled "Au-delà de l'impossible" (Beyond the Impossible). The book is described as a thrilling adventure that explores knowledge from lost civilizations, physics, and secrets of inexhaustible energy, potentially challenging our vision of the world and the future. It is said to draw upon revelations attributed to Albert Einstein and Nikola Tesla, focusing on the possibility that consciousness persists after death.

III - Towards Egypt from Bucegi?

This section speculates about a connection between discoveries in Egypt and the Bucegi Mountains. It suggests that cavities found within the Egyptian pyramids might be subterranean "terminals" linked to the Bucegi Mountains. The article references a discovery in 2003 of a hall of secret archives left by an unknown civilization in the Romanian mountain, from which three tunnels reportedly originate, one leading to Gizeh, Egypt. This is presented as a continuation of the book "Le Mystère Egyptien" (The Egyptian Mystery).

Exploration of the Great Pyramid of Giza using Muons

An article from Paris Match, discussed by Anne Cécile Beaudouin, details the use of muon technology to explore the Great Pyramid of Giza. This technique detects elementary particles falling from space, allowing for the identification of dense areas and voids. The ScanPyramids mission, co-directed by Mehdi Tayoubi, used sophisticated equipment to analyze muon data collected over 67 days. This led to the discovery of a previously unknown internal cavity within the Pyramid of Khufu, located above the descending corridor behind the north face.

IV - Eragny sur Oise (October 6, 1988)

This section recounts an event from October 6, 1988, in Eragny sur Oise, France. Witnesses observed white forms performing a series of rapid plunges, slow approaches to a balcony, and rapid ascents for about ten minutes. The description includes a diagram illustrating the trajectory of these objects. The article notes that Joël Ménard wrote about mobile lights in LDLN n°337, and one of the witnesses was identified as "Gé," lending credibility to the testimony.

Gérard Deforge presented his investigations, titled "Ovni soit qui mal y pense" (UFOs be they good or bad), at Ovni Paris on November 8, 2016.

V - Return to the Cergy-Pontoise Case (1979)

The issue revisits the Cergy-Pontoise UFO case from November 26, 1979. Salomon N'Diaye reported that his friend Franck Fontaine was abducted by a UFO. Police from Cergy and Pontoise investigated the scene. According to N'Diaye, Franck had gone to investigate a luminous trail with his car. When Salomon and Jean-Pierre Prévost arrived, they saw Franck's car enveloped in a luminous mist and surrounded by spheres. The mist formed a cylinder and then disappeared rapidly. Upon approaching the car, Franck was gone.

The article frames this as a new look at the case, suggesting that despite being considered a hoax by some, "Dossiers de SO" attempts to provide answers and new insights into this event. A book by Patrice Sevrais, "Ovni retour sur cette l'affaire de Cergy-Pontoise," is mentioned, which will present his perspective on the case.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include historical UFO sightings, particularly those involving humanoid figures described as "Michelin Men," and the investigation of these cases through witness accounts and media analysis. There is also a focus on scientific approaches to UFO research, exemplified by the muon study of the Great Pyramid. The magazine appears to maintain an open but critical stance, presenting various cases and encouraging further investigation while acknowledging the challenges of definitive proof and the potential for hoaxes or misinterpretations. The inclusion of book reviews and discussions among commentators suggests an active engagement with the UFO community and ongoing research.

Title: La Gazette de l'Ufo
Issue: 34
Volume: 11/12
Date: 24/11/2016

This issue of La Gazette de l'Ufo focuses on the controversial case of Franck Fontaine from Cergy-Pontoise, featuring a discussion among various contributors about the nature of the event, including theories of hoax, cover-up, and genuine mystery.

The Franck Fontaine Case: A Multifaceted Discussion

The central theme of this issue is the Franck Fontaine case, with several individuals sharing their perspectives and research.

Georges Metz expresses regret for missing a conference on the case and immediately questions the 'Sceptic-Ovni' perspective that suggests the disappearance was a hoax. He believes that a naive person would think nothing mysterious happened. Metz recalls an acquaintance, the late ufologist Robert Clause, who had met Franck Fontaine's father. Metz asserts that Franck Fontaine was being monitored by the Renseignements Généraux and the Direction de la Surveillance du Territoire, suggesting their involvement was to 'stifle the affair' and prevent public unrest. He believes the 'hoax' narrative served to avoid complications and reassure the public, allowing various groups, including Jimmy Guieu's associates like J-P. Prévost and S.N'Diaye, to maintain their own beliefs. Metz invites Patrice Seray to share insights on the 'shadow zones' of the abduction.

Jean Pierre Troadec inquires if anyone has purchased the document "Retour sur l'affaire de Cergy" and if it contains new information. He shares his own experience investigating the case locally at the time, meeting with the 'trio' and Jimmy Guieu, as well as other peripheral figures. Troadec followed the case's evolution to Bourg de Sirod and Brittany, with supplementary accounts from JP Prévost. For him, the case remains a good 'case study,' and he finds the 'pure hoax' theory not at all evident.

Guy Coat suggests that Gérard Deforge might be able to answer some questions regarding the affair.

Gérard Deforge praises Georges Metz's analysis and adds his own five points regarding the Cergy case, which he simply names 'Cergy'.

1. He references his report on Haravilliers, where M.D recounted strange circumstances leading to a meeting with Franck Fontaine's father, which he believes supports the case.
2. Deforge recounts his experience with important union responsibilities at FO, where his office was adjacent to the FO police. He states that the police were 'obliged to publicly close' the case because they couldn't reach any certain conclusions, and the media attention was becoming problematic.
3. He mentions that his dossier includes supplementary information not previously investigated by specialists, concerning 'minutes' of depositions recorded by the gendarmerie, acknowledging he cannot be 'everywhere'.
4. He shares an amusing detail: he had a student named Frank Fontaine in his class, described as a normal and charming boy. His wife, at the time, had Prévost as a student, whom he describes less favorably.
5. Deforge expresses strong disapproval of Patrice Seray's writings on 'crop circles,' calling them 'sloppy' and 'oriented towards disinformation.' He states he has already discarded Seray's book and will not attend his conference, finding better uses for his time.

Jean Claude Venturini shares that he lived about 400 meters from the location of Franck Fontaine's 'disappearance.' He reveals that years later, he and others met with Franck Fontaine, had lunch with him, and that Franck harbored resentment towards J-P. Prévost, who is reportedly deceased, as is S.N'Diaye (this needs confirmation). During this meal, Franck Fontaine reiterated his original testimony.

Document References

A document link is provided: `http://oncle-dom.fr/paranormal/ovni/cas/cergy/cergy.htm`

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme is the ambiguity and controversy surrounding the Franck Fontaine case, with a clear division between those who view it as a genuine unexplained event and those who suspect it was a hoax or a cover-up. The editorial stance appears to favor presenting multiple viewpoints and encouraging further investigation, while also expressing skepticism towards certain researchers like Patrice Seray. The magazine highlights the involvement of intelligence agencies and the challenges faced by investigators in reaching definitive conclusions.