Gazette des Mousquetaires - No 02 - Ufologie Critique (Suite)

Magazine Overview

Title: La Gazette des Mousquetaires de l'Ufo
Issue: N°2
Date: November 17-21, 2014
Theme: Critical Ufology (Continued)

This issue of "La Gazette des Mousquetaires de l'Ufo" presents a continuation of discussions on critical ufology, featuring a series of message exchanges between various contributors. The content delves into the technical, psychological, and philosophical aspects of UFO phenomena, witness testimonies, and the broader implications for human understanding.

I - L'Ufologie critique, future science ? (Suite)

The section begins with a message from Robert Lortal on November 18, 2014, discussing the physics of UFO propulsion. He theorizes that a craft generates a repulsive magnetic field to maintain altitude, with variations causing ascent or descent. He also mentions an 'attractive penetration tunnel' and a failsafe repulsive field for recovery. Lortal then shifts to the psychic aspect, highlighting the importance of telepathy and the difficulty in developing psychic abilities due to Earthly conditioning. He suggests that developing these abilities could lead to profound changes in human understanding.

Jean Claude Venturini responds on November 19, 2014, correcting Lortal, stating that it is the gravitational field, not the magnetic field, that needs to be opposed for elevation, though he acknowledges magnetism could play a role if amplified.

Gilles Lorant adds a brief, enthusiastic note on November 18, 2014.

II - Suite à l'émission sur Planète + Canal 83

This section details a discussion initiated by Gérard Deforge on November 19, 2014, regarding an emission on Planète+ and comments made by Daniel Goldschmidt. Deforge expresses frustration with Georges Metz for 'CC-ing' people he doesn't know and relays Goldschmidt's alleged statement that UFO witnesses suffer from 'psychic pathology'. Deforge clarifies that he did not see or hear the emission but is reacting to what Metz wrote.

Georges Metz responds on November 19, 2014, suggesting that humans may not be ready for advanced technology and that knowledge could lead to more conflict. He also touches upon the possibility of psychic communication channels.

Gérard Deforge continues his message, questioning Metz's approach and defending his own actions in promoting the disclosure of UFO cases. He states that his efforts are not for personal gain and that he has not profited financially. He also addresses Metz's reaction to his involvement in the Haravilliers case and the Planète+ documentary, explaining his role in facilitating interviews.

Deforge further elaborates on Daniel Goldschmidt, noting that Goldschmidt was present in a documentary and discussed four hypnosis regressions. Deforge confirms he spoke with Goldschmidt, who agreed to be interviewed by Planète+ journalists, and that Goldschmidt's presence was significant. He also mentions that Goldschmidt no longer deals with 'contactees in ufology'.

Georges Metz, in a message dated November 18, 2014, expresses regret at missing a broadcast on November 16. He clarifies that he never proposed anything to Zahia and that Jean-Claude was present on June 30, 2004. He also notes that Daniel Goldschmidt is no longer involved with 'contactees in ufology'.

Gérard Deforge, in a message dated November 17, 2014, discusses a broadcast that he predicted would be impactful. He mentions that Charles's testimony was recorded at his home, and he had also recommended Myr and Marc Grey. He highlights that Georges Metz proposed a hypnosis regression for Zaya, which Daniel Goldsmith conducted, followed by two more regressions proposed by Deforge himself, including one for Myr. He calls this a 'first' in France, with regressions conducted by a clinician.

Deforge also comments on the importance of acknowledging investigators who uncover significant cases, as this facilitates media work.

In a message dated November 19, 2014, Gilles Lorant humorously refers to himself as 'Coat' and discusses opinions on his singing talent. He then shifts to a more serious note about studying a polygon in Cergy and a convivial table setting.

Gilles Lorant, in a message dated November 19, 2014, shares a 'diaporama' (slideshow) and apologizes for a previous outburst, attributing it to the intensity of discussions. He playfully refers to Gérard Deforge as a 'mousquetaire' and discusses his own past experience with Zahia, influenced by Georges Metz's book.

Deforge responds, acknowledging Lorant's point about Zahia and the potential for minor errors in heated discussions. He notes that Georges Metz did not fully grasp the tribute being paid to him. Deforge also confirms his conversation with Daniel Goldschmidt regarding the broadcast, stating that Goldschmidt's statements during the emission differed from what Georges claimed. He concludes that Goldschmidt has evolved positively.

III - Suite à Abductions – C'est n'importe quoi

This section features an exchange between Gérard Deforge and Gilles Lorant on November 14, 2014, concerning abductions. Deforge discusses how personality modifications do not necessarily affect all faculties and recalls Lorant's childhood experience in Le Perche, Normandy. Lorant recounts being gravely ill as a child, taken to a secluded woman who placed him in her arms and spoke of him needing to 'go' to make way for someone else, entrusting him to 'angels'. His mother witnessed a great light in the woods. After this, Lorant was never sick again. He also mentions his parents' subsequent divorce and his father's harsh words about him.

Lorant also shares a memory from his mother about a sudden light in the woods when he was four, which he didn't recall but was visually similar to a video he attached.

Other Content

On page 9, a link is provided to a news article about a strange light in the Russian sky from November 19, 2014. The author expresses gratitude to the 'mousquetaires' for their influence since 2006, suggesting they may have prevented him from going down a wrong path. He emphasizes the importance of free will and empathy.

A note dated November 21, 2014, describes a meeting of six 'mousquetaires de l'Ufo' in Cergy Pontoise. The discussion was described as intense, exploring a vaster world and the search for humanity's place in the universe. The exchanges were sharp and provocative, driven by a passion for discussion. The hope is for strong relationships between researchers beyond ufology, emphasizing original and singular perspectives.

Page 10 features photographs from the meeting in Cergy Pontoise on November 20, 2014, listing the attendees: Georges Metz, Gérard Deforge, Jean Claude Venturini, Gilles Lorant, Patrice Galecteros, and Guy Coatanroch. It also includes a logo for 'Les Mousquetaires de l'Ufologie' with a UFO and stylized figures.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are critical analysis of ufology, the exploration of advanced technologies and psychic abilities, and the detailed examination of witness testimonies and abduction cases. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, encouraging rigorous investigation and discussion, while acknowledging the complexities and potential psychological aspects involved. There is a strong emphasis on personal experience, documented evidence, and the ongoing search for understanding humanity's place in the cosmos.