Flying Saucer Review - No 05 - 1952 03 04

Magazine Overview

This issue of the FLYING SAUCER REVIEW, identified as #5 and covering MARCH-APRIL 1952, is published by E. Rockmore and priced at 30¢ PER COPY. The magazine's primary goal is to collect and analyze reports of unidentified flying objects (UFOs).

Structure and Content

The publication is divided into four distinct sections:

• #1 REWRITE SECTION: This section focuses on presenting the basic facts of received reports, separating them from sensationalized newspaper accounts to facilitate analysis.
• #2 ANALYSIS SECTION: Here, individual reports are analyzed in a general attempt to establish their authenticity. This section also includes an analysis of overall patterns that may emerge from the collected data.
• #3 CREDIT SECTION: This section acknowledges and thanks individuals who have aided the Review by submitting reports or providing translations of foreign reports.
• #4 HISTORICAL SUPPLEMENT: This section is planned for future issues and will discuss reports from the early 1800s and 1900s. Its inclusion is contingent upon the availability of sufficient historical reports.

Key Incidents and Sightings (March-April 1952)

The "Rewrite Section" details numerous sightings across North America:

• March 2, 1952 (San Diego, California): A large, brilliant, fiery green object with a long tail was observed falling earthward and appearing to burn out.
• March 7, 1952 (Tucson, Arizona): Two bright lights were seen, which binoculars revealed to be a flat, silvery object hovering noiselessly over nearby mountains. It was observed by a doctor, his wife, and another woman.
• March 12, 1952 (Columbus, Ohio): A long, shiny, wingless, cigar-shaped object moved southwesterly, emitted a bright light, turned westward, and then northward before disappearing. Other witnesses described it as a red or orange meter or comet-like object.
• March 12, 1952 (Wellston, Ohio): A long silvery, wingless object with fire shooting from its tail crossed the northwestern sky.
• March 12, 1952 (Near Athens, Ohio): An object resembling a long silvery streak of fire was seen, appearing to head towards earth at an angle, then travel horizontally before becoming fiery red.
• March 14, 1952 (Hammond, British Columbia): A silver, shimmering white light, appearing as a large star, moved, stopped, reversed direction, and made sharp up and down motions. It was observed by lumbermen, including an ex-RCAF pilot.
• March 14, 1952 (Near Chillecothe, Ohio): A long white streak, described as a 'faintly visible' jet plane, was observed through a telescope.
• March 14, 1952 (Near Coolville, Ohio): A silvery object appeared to change position in the sky for 10 minutes without growing larger, possibly a vapor trail.
• March 14, 1952 (Mason County, West Virginia): The same object observed in western sky was reported.
• March 14, 1952 (Durham, North Carolina): Round or rectangular objects with curved edges crossed the sky from north to south, observed by a watchman and former plane spotter.
• March 14, 1952 (Queens County, New York): An oblong, cigar-shaped object with a soft 'pearl-like' glow rolled from side to side, crossing the sky within three minutes.
• March 16, 1952 (Conway, Texas): A bright white object with a long yellow tail rose perpendicularly, hovered, turned at a right angle, moved horizontally, and then disappeared.
• March 17, 1952 (Ionia, Michigan): A very bright, silvery, streak-like object crossed the sky, wobbling and resembling two saucers placed edge to edge.
• March 22, 1952 (Mirafores Locks, Panama Canal): An unknown 'airplane' or object crossed the sky.
• March 26, 1952 (Chicago, Illinois): Two saucer-like objects flew out of a cloud, turned over, flew in a straight line, and returned to the clouds. Later, a silvery, shining saucer-like object flew out of a cloud.
• March 30, 1952 (Greenfield, Massachusetts): A noise like wind was heard, followed by a bright, silvery object, appearing as a large rotating ring, which descended, stopped, turned on edge, moved horizontally, banked, and disappeared.
• April 1, 1952 (Gulf of Mexico): An object resembling an airplane fell into the sea. A search found no wreckage.
• April 1, 1952 (Stockton, Kansas): A very bright, metallic globe or disc hovered stationary or moved slowly at a great height.
• April 2, 1952 (Austin, Texas): A reddish, luminous, spherical object crossed the sky at high speed.
• April 2, 1952 (Houston, Texas): A fiery, spherical object with a long trail crossed the sky horizontally.
• April 2, 1952 (Fort Worth, Texas): A fiery, spherical object crossed the sky in a flat path.
• April 2, 1952 (Wichita Falls, Texas): A fiery object trailed by a bluish light crossed the sky.
• April 2, 1952 (Dallas, Texas): A fiery, yellowish-orange, spherical object crossed the sky.
• April 2, 1952 (Longview, Texas): The same object observed in Dallas was seen.
• April 2, 1952 (Durant, Oklahoma): A fiery red, spherical object trailing sparks crossed the sky.
• April 3, 1952 (Near Kiowa, Oklahoma): A bright scarlet object, appearing as two separate spheres, crossed the sky at a speed slightly faster than a kite.
• April 3, 1952 (Benson, Arizona): A very bright, silvery, wingless oval or egg-shaped object hovered motionless for an hour at a great height.
• April 4, 1952 (Near Hammond, British Columbia): A shimmering, green light, resembling an airplane light, appeared, moved, changed color, turned sharply, stopped, reversed direction, and disappeared.
• April 5, 1952 (Dallas, Texas): A fluttering object at high altitude crossed the sky with great speed.
• April 7, 1952 (Racine, Wisconsin): A fiery, spherical, phosphorescent green object, trailed by flames, crossed the sky with great speed.
• April 7, 1952 (Portland, Oregon): An unknown object appeared to rise into the sky. A bright green, meteor-like object exploded into sparks. Three bright lights in formation were observed at high altitude.
• April 9, 1952 (Pensacola, Florida): An object resembling an airplane trailed by smoke crossed the sky, followed by another object falling from the sky and a heavy explosion.
• April 9, 1952 (Pintado, New Mexico): An aluminum-colored object resembling a bowtie appeared to somersault across the sky at high speed.
• April 11, 1952 (Temiskaming, Ontario): Six disc-like objects followed by vapor trails dove up and down in the sky.
• April 11, 1952 (Lancaster, Pennsylvania): A saucer-like object was seen in the sky.
• April 11, 1952 (Near Hammond, British Columbia): A bright light similar to previous sightings in the area was observed.
• April 11, 1952 (Near Ithaca, New York): A bright, self-luminous, flickering, reddish-orange object rose from the horizon and moved steadily southwest.
• April 12, 1952 (North Bay, Ontario): A bright amber, disc-like object came from the southwest, stopped, reversed direction, and rose into the sky at high speed.
• April 12, 1952 (Winchester, Virginia): A hazy orange, spherical object with sparks and a hazy orange trail was observed in the southern sky, appearing to revolve at great speed.

Analysis and Conclusions

The analysis for each sighting attempts to rule out conventional explanations such as airplanes, balloons, or meteors. Common conclusions include "Probably a saucer," "Possibly a foo fighter," or "Possibly a meteor," depending on the specific characteristics reported. The publication notes that some reports are too fragmentary to draw definitive conclusions.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently analyzes sightings against known phenomena, often concluding that the reported objects do not fit the characteristics of conventional aircraft, balloons, or meteors. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious investigation into UFO phenomena, encouraging the submission of reports and aiming for factual analysis. The inclusion of a "Historical Supplement" indicates a broader interest in the history of UFO sightings. The publisher, Elliott Rockmore, is actively involved in collecting and disseminating this information.

This document is page 10 of 'Rewrite Section, Saucer Review #5', a publication from April 1952, compiled by E. Rockmore. It details a series of unidentified flying object (UFO) and saucer sightings reported across various locations, primarily in North America, with a few international entries. Each entry includes the date, location, a description of the observed phenomenon, the source of the report (typically a newspaper), and an analysis of the sighting.

Review of Sightings

April 13, 1952

• Central Norway: Three persons observed a disc-like object flying for 30 minutes. The report was noted as coming from a leading European paper, suggesting authenticity.
• Cleveland, Ohio: A disc-like object, brilliant on top with a bluish-violet flare, was seen at 3,000 feet altitude. It vibrated slightly and faded to the southwest. Observers included an airline radio operator and colleagues. Analysis considered airplane, balloon, or meteor, but concluded 'probably a saucer'.

April 14, 1952

• Anchorage, Alaska: A huge disc-like object slowly crossed the sky in 30 minutes, observed by a dozen people. Analysis suggested it was too slow for an airplane, possibly a balloon, or a saucer.

April 15, 1952

• Phoenix, Arizona: A fiery green, spherical object, appearing as large as the sun, crossed the southwestern sky. Analysis ruled out airplane and balloon due to size and speed, considering it possibly a 'fireball signal saucer' or meteor.
• Detroit, Michigan: Bright objects with a reddish glow were seen floating over the city airport. Airport traffic officers theorized they were new neon lights on airline planes. The analysis noted insufficient information but suggested reflections from plane lights.

April 16, 1952

• Haliburton, Ontario: Two silvery streak-like objects performed complex maneuvers for five minutes, one directly behind the other. Analysis suggested they were too fast and maneuverable for airplanes or balloons, concluding 'probably 2 saucers'.
• North Bay, Ontario: A light flashed, and an object left a thin, white vapor trail. It was noted as not being a jet. Analysis considered it possibly a saucer or a high-flying jet.
• Nome, Alaska: Three vapor trails crossed the sky. While identification was not made in April, a July newspaper release identified them as Russian craft. The analysis questioned how the air force could identify them months later, suggesting the possibility of saucers.
• Hamilton, Ontario: A huge, revolving, brownish ring-like object with a clear center stayed in the sky for four minutes, changing color to bright bluish-white. It was compared to a previous Arkansas report. Analysis concluded 'Probably a saucer, possibly a rare new saucer type'.
• Baldwin, Long Island, New York: A small, bright white light followed by a larger reddish light crossed the sky horizontally in two minutes. Observed by children, analysis suggested it was likely a high-flying plane.

April 17, 1952

• San Jose, California: Two glowing globular objects appeared hovering together. Telescope examination revealed reddish globes with dark belts. Two photographs were taken. Analysis considered it a 'foo fighter object' or possibly a luminous saucer.
• Williamsport, Pennsylvania: An object resembling a 'big block of silver' crossed the sky, following reports of vapor trails. Analysis suggested it might be a silvery jet or a saucer.
• Scarboro, Ontario: A fiery spherical object trailing black smoke raced down from the sky over a lake. A search found no debris. Analysis considered it possibly a saucer or some sort of signal.
• Coban, Guatemala: A small, luminous object leaving a vapor trail crossed the sky.

April 18, 1952

• Corner Brook, Newfoundland: A yellowish, spherical object circled town twice before speeding northwest. Analysis ruled out airplanes (too early for flights), balloons (speed too great), and meteors (maneuverability). Conclusion: 'Probably a saucer, possibly a foo fighter'.
• Montreal, Quebec: A shiny, mirror-like object crossed the sky in a straight line, becoming smaller and disappearing after 20 seconds. Analysis suggested it was unlikely to be a plane, balloon, or meteor, concluding 'Probably a saucer'.
• Hawkesbury, Ontario: Two objects, resembling jet planes, left vapor trails. A loud explosion was heard, and only one trail remained. RCAF stated no airplanes were missing. Analysis suggested it was likely two jet planes or possibly two saucers.
• Brooks Range, Alaska: Several vapor trails were sighted, deemed 'unexplained' by the air force.
• Jutland, Denmark: Several saucer-like objects were seen. Reports suggested they were probably not ordinary aircraft.
• Hammond, British Columbia: A bluish, spherical object appeared to shimmer as it hovered in the sky. Analysis considered it possibly a saucer or a balloon.

April 19, 1952

• San Diego, California: A series of heavy explosions were heard and felt. Police found no wreckage. Theorized as supersonic shock from jet planes, but analysis questioned the lack of jet plane mentions and the nature of meteoric explosions.
• Toronto, Ontario: 50 to 60 self-luminous, pale orange objects in a V-formation crossed the sky at great speed within 6 seconds. Analysis concluded 'Probably luminous saucers, possibly foo fighters', noting the unlikelihood of 50 planes being noiseless.
• London, Ontario: A dark, cylindrical object leaving a vapor trail crossed the sky at tremendous speed (estimated 1,000-2,000 mph). P51 Mustang fighters could not intercept it. Analysis concluded 'Probably a saucer', possibly a ghost rocket-ship.
• Detroit, Michigan: A vapor trail was observed, similar to one seen 12 minutes earlier in London, Ontario.
• Wingham, Ontario: An object with a ball of fire in its tail was observed.

April 20, 1952

• Los Angeles, California: A glowing, winglike object resembling a sharply pointed star was seen. It dived, climbed, hovered, and maneuvered noiselessly for 20 minutes. Analysis noted it as a new saucer type, possibly related to a previous crescent-shaped wing report.
• Hammond, British Columbia: A fiery, spherical object crossed the sky. Analysis considered it possibly a green signal object or a meteor.
• Molson, Manitoba: A bright, sparkling disc-like object, changing color, rapidly crossed the sky.
• Tuxedo, Manitoba: A small, self-luminous, circular object changed color from yellow to orange as it crossed the sky at great speed.
• Winnipeg, Manitoba: A self-luminous, green light at low altitude slowly became red, then yellow, as it crossed the sky. Another report described a bright star-like object that stopped and reversed its movement.

April 23, 1952

• Fort Worth, Texas: Approximately 50 pinkish or brownish glowing objects with wings crossed the sky in formation, observed by a newspaper reporter. Analysis considered it possibly a saucer formation or a bird formation.
• Bradford, Pennsylvania: A bright red object or flash of light with a trail of flame crossed the sky. Analysis found the report incomplete for positive identification.
• Austin, Texas: Three formations of about 50 pinkish objects with a bright spot in front and a sparkling effect in the back crossed the sky at high speed. A communications engineer estimated the objects were 40,000 feet high and traveling 5,000 mph. Analysis discussed reflected sunlight versus self-luminosity and noted the 'sparkling effect' seen in past saucer reports.
• Reno, Nevada: A fiery green, spherical object followed by a less brilliant green tail appeared to be headed directly for earth. Analysis considered it possibly a green fireball signal saucer or an ordinary meteor.

April 24, 1952

• Austin, Texas: An orange, glowing, circular object sped across the sky. Analysis questioned its occurrence during daylight and its presence among other Austin reports.
• Austin, Texas: A silvery object crossed the sky with great speed. The observer stated it did not look like a plane.
• Austin, Texas: A reddish object at great height crossed the sky at a speed greater than an airplane. Analysis noted it was too high and fast for a plane and possibly a previously seen saucer.
• Austin, Texas: Several reddish, glowing objects in formation, followed by bluish objects, crossed the sky at great speed. Analysis concluded 'Probably saucer formations, slight possibility of jet formations'.

April 25, 1952

• Vancouver, British Columbia: A V-formation of orange objects with a bluish glow, and a second V-formation behind it, came from the south at terrific speed, then shot upward and disappeared. Analysis noted it was similar to a previous report and concluded 'Probably a saucer formation'.
• Spokane, Washington: A bright, rocket-like object emitting red, green, and yellow flames lit up the sky as it raced toward Spokane and disappeared. Analysis considered it possibly a saucer or ghost rocketship.
• Regina, Saskatchewan: A disc-like object with a tail like a kite hovered for a few seconds, then shot out spurts of fire and moved across the sky. Analysis concluded 'Probably a saucer'.
• Ottawa, Ontario: A trowel-shaped object with a dark tail traveled at great speed across the northeastern sky. Analysis concluded 'Probably a saucer, slight possibility it was a meteor'.
• Moorhead, Minnesota: Five orange and red disc-like objects in a V-formation crossed the sky moving northwestward. Analysis concluded 'Probably saucers'.

April 26, 1952

• Lake Wilcox, Ontario: A bright, hazy circular object hovered in the sky, then suddenly raced across the sky at great speed.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this review are the consistent reporting of unusual aerial phenomena that defy conventional explanations like airplanes, balloons, or meteors. The publication, through its analyses, leans towards classifying many of these sightings as 'saucers' or 'unknowns', suggesting a belief in the reality of unidentified flying objects. The editorial stance appears to be one of cataloging and analyzing these reports, often highlighting the limitations of existing knowledge and the need for further investigation into these phenomena. The consistent use of 'Copyrighted 1952 by E. Rockmore' indicates a proprietary compilation of these UFO reports.

This document is "Rewrite Section, Review #5," a compilation and analysis of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) reports, primarily from April and early May 1952. The publication is copyrighted by E. Rockmore and appears to be a specialized review focusing on UAP sightings.

Analysis of Aerial Phenomena Reports

The core of the document consists of numbered entries, each detailing a specific sighting. These entries typically include:

• Case Number: e.g., #108, #109, etc.
• Date and Time: Precise or approximate.
• Location: City, State/Province, Country, and sometimes Latitude/Longitude.
• Description: A summary of what was observed, including shape, color, luminosity, behavior, and speed.
• Source: The publication or broadcast where the report was originally found (e.g., newspapers, radio programs).
• Analysis: An assessment of possible explanations, considering conventional aircraft, meteors, balloons, or other known phenomena.
• Conclusion: A determination of the most probable identification, often concluding with 'Probably a saucer,' 'Possibly a meteor,' or 'Probably a foo fighter.'

Notable Sightings and Analysis:

• #108 (Milwaukee, Wisconsin): Described as an airplane? Shape unknown, great reflecting quality or self-luminosity in daytime unknown in aircraft. Meteor? Extremely rare in daytime, unable to hover. Conclusion: Probably a saucer.
• #109 (Moorhead, Minnesota): Five glowing, circular objects in V-formation, crossed sky, moving northwesterly. Observed by a policeman and 5 other adults. Analysis: Airplanes? Shape unknown, self-luminosity unknown. Meteors? Do not fly in formation, speed apparently too slow. Conclusion: Probably saucers.
• #110 (Brockton, Massachusetts): An explosion was heard, then a bright light resembling a flare fell toward earth in the south. Observed by 7 persons. Analysis: Meteor? Speed too slow, but there is some resemblance to a meteoric explosion. Flare? Has some resemblance to one, although they are not easily obtainable and firing within city limits is not allowed. Conclusion: Probably a flare, possibly a meteor or saucer.
• #111 (Manchester, Michigan): One bright phosphorescent green, disc-like object, with a tail at very great altitude, apparent speed twice a jet plane, crossed sky in level flight, then dived over horizon. Observed by a business agent, engineer training, and his wife. Analysis: Airplane? Shape unknown, brilliant self-luminosity unknown. Meteor? Close resemblance, but coloration is rare, such large fireballs are rare, and its level flight not common in most meteor reports. Conclusion: Probably a green signal fireball, possibly an ordinary meteor.
• #112 (Ann Arbor, Michigan): One brilliant blue-green object trailed by greenish sparks falling from it, crossed sky with great speed, from north to south. Analysis: Same applies to this report as the previous one. Conclusion: Probably a green signal saucer fireball, possibly an ordinary meteor.
• #114 (North Auckland, New Zealand): Saucer-like object observed. Analysis: Insufficient information from original small reference but it apparently did not resemble any aircraft farmer had ever seen. Conclusion: Probably a saucer, possibly a meteor.
• #115 (Vancouver, British Columbia): One amber-colored sphere appeared to bounce or rise and fall in sky, then moved toward the east. It came back over the same course, and disappeared. It returned a third time, appearing slightly lighter, and moved away toward the southwest. Analysis: Airplane? Shape unknown, hovering ability unknown, self-luminousity unknown. Balloon? Cannot return to same area as if controlled, three times, since it is guided only by wind, also is not self-luminous. Conclusion: Probably a saucer, possibly a foo fighter.
• #116 (Lake Tanwax, Pieme County, Washington): A loud humming noise was heard in sky. Then about 10 dark, disc-like objects crossed part of sky from west to east, then suddenly turned and headed northwards, disappearing within 3 seconds. Analysis: Airplanes? Shape unknown, sudden turn not possible with present aircraft. Balloon cluster? Speed too great, never make a noise, and cannot change path so quickly. Conclusion: Probably saucers.
• #117 (San Jose, California): One luminous object hovered in sky for 5 minutes. Analysis: Airplane? Cannot hover, are not self-luminous, would have made and engine noise. Balloon? Self-luminosity unknown, rarely carries lights. Conclusion: Probably a saucer or foo-fighter, possibly a balloon.
• #119 (Singapore/Johore Bahru, Malay States): A silver, cigar shaped object resembling a rocket, and spouting white smoke at intervals, crossed sky and disappeared after its largest puff of smoke. No jet aircraft in flight at time, and no weather balloons were in flight. Conclusion: Probably a 'ghost' rocketship, similar to the Swedish 1946 reports.
• #120 (Albuquerque, New Mexico): One bright green, spherical object turned a bright orange as it crossed northern sky in several seconds, heading northwesterly. Analysis: Airplane? Shape unknown, self-luminosity unknown. Meteor? Some resemblance, but color is rare, as was its flat path, and large size. (Comment: The color change was mentioned in Review #23 as possibly representing a sort of signal system to be expected near the Mars Opposition of May 1st; A red to green or reversed green to red color representing colors of Mars and Earth.) Conclusion: Possibly a fireball signal saucer, possibly an ordinary meteor.
• #121 (Rouyn, Quebec): A reddish object, crescent shaped on one side, pear-shaped on the other, observed in sky, disappeared in 2 minutes. Analysis: Airplane? Not self-luminous, do not have this shape. Balloon? Self-luminosity unknown, shape unknown. Conclusion: Probably a saucer.
• #122 (Tijeras Canyon, New Mexico): One small, silvery, disc-like object hovered 2 minutes in sky, in a horizontal position underneath a cloud. It slowly tilted up in a vertical direction, and then slowly moved northward, and apparently disappeared into a cloud. It was not luminous, but reflected sunlight when it tilted. Analysis: Airplane? Cannot hover, do not have disc shape. Balloon? Some resemblance, but shape usually spherical, and would not reflect light like a mirror. (Comment: This is very similar to the #22 Feb 18 Albuquerque report, and it would appear that the Tijeras Canyon area has either some unknown special interest for the saucers, or may possibly be a landing field or stopping point, with the 3 (known) sightings there, at same general time.) Conclusion: Probably a saucer.
• #123 (Vancouver, British Columbia): One bluish, circular object, apparently twice the size of a bright star, changed to a cone-like object, as it disappeared in the Southwest. Analysis: Airplane? Shape unknown either as sphere, or cone, self-luminosity unknown. Balloon? Self-luminosity unknown, apparent speed too great. Meteor? Some resemblance, but the object is described as being watched between 10:15 and 10:30, and apparently was visible for several minutes, too long for any meteor. Conclusion: Probably a saucer.
• #124 (Toronto, Ontario): Three bluish-green objects observed in sky. Conclusion: Probably 3 signal saucers, possibly an exploded meteor.
• #125 (Ottawa, Canada): One huge, disc-like object, surrounded with a silvery-blue or pale green halo, and followed by a silvery or white light, noiselessly curved across sky, at a tremendous speed, from southeast to northwest in less than 60 seconds. Observed by 2 persons in 2 different areas in city. (Alfred, Ontario): Same brilliant, pale green, nearly square shaped object, fell toward earth for 20 seconds, then very sharply curved upwards as it crossed sky from southeast to northwest, at approximately 1,000 mph. Observed by a graduate psychologist. Analysis: Airplane? Self-luminosity unknown, speed apparently too great, and plane would not leave such a brilliant trail. Meteor? Length of time flight took too great, color rare, and meteors never curve upwards, but always fall toward earth. (Comment: This appears to be the expected signal fireball mentioned in Review #3 to occur at the time of the Mars Opposition.) Conclusion: Probably a green fireball signal saucer.
• #127 (Portland, Maine): An object resembling an extremely bright star, revolved in southeast sky, as it showed a white light, then a green light, and then a red light at intervals. Under examination through binoculars, it was also moving horizontally, and finally disappeared behind a house. Examination of the sky located 5 more similar revolving 'pinwheel' objects that also appeared to revolve, but these did not move horizontally. Observed by a family of 3. Head of family was a retired weather forecaster. Analysis: Airplane? Are not self-luminous, no motor noise was heard, apparently moved too slowly for a plane, and other pinwheels did not move at all. (Comment: It is possible that this was a star or several stars seen under peculiar air conditions, but if the first pinwheel did cross sky and disappear behind a house, then this would be ruled out. This object definitely appears to be the secondary and very rare color-changing signal object, probably foo-fighter, that was discussed in Review #23, and its occurrence on the Mars Opposition date would back the general theory of these robot signals. The chief weakness of the theory is that such signals are of no value, but considering the robot-like objects mentioned in this review that went back over the same path instead of moving in a shorter route, they may help explain these signal objects, in that they were automatic or robot controlled, with no response expected.) Conclusion: Probably a rare color-changing foo fighter, possibly a saucer.

Patterns and Conclusions

#1 Amount of Activity Pattern:

Reports (excluding vapor trails, falling objects, and explosions) sharply decreased in March to about 8 per month. In April, reports sharply increased to about 65 per month, about 3 times the monthly average of the January-February period. This includes many Canadian reports. The beginning of the expected May 1952 increase of reports during the Mars close approach to Earth is noted.

#2 Quality of Activity Pattern:

Reports are broken down into approximate classifications:

• Flying Saucers: 60 reports (about 68%)
• Fireballs: 10 reports (about 12%)
• Ghost Rockets: 4 reports (about 4%)
• Foo Fighter Obj.: 2 reports (about 24%)
• Vaportrails: 4 reports (about 4%)
• Falling Planes: 2 reports (about 2%)
• Explosions: 2 reports (about 22%)
• Insufficient Info: 3 reports (about 3%)

The document states that these listings are crude approximations, as many reports are not made public. It asserts that the majority of reports are probably authentic, as most people can distinguish planes and birds from UAPs.

#3 Periods of Activity Pattern:

The middle of April marked the beginning of heavy saucer activity, which peaked in late July-early August. This activity is considered to be the expected increase during the Mars close approach.

#4 Area of Activity Pattern:

• Northeast: 27 reports
• Midwest: 15 reports
• Northwest: 13 reports
• Southwest: 13 reports
• Midsouth: 9 reports
• Southeast: 3 reports

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme is the analysis and classification of unidentified aerial phenomena, with a consistent leaning towards identifying them as 'saucers' or 'foo fighters' when conventional explanations are insufficient. The editorial stance appears to be that most reports are authentic and that the public should not be swayed by skepticism from 'authoritative bodies.' The publication also notes the significance of astronomical events, such as the Mars Opposition, in relation to UAP activity. The document includes a comprehensive list of individuals credited for their contributions, including those who provided entire collections of reports and those who assisted with 'copy work for review' and 'checking library newspapers.' It also highlights organizations active in the field, such as the Extraterrestrial Research Organization and Borderland Science Associates.

Title: Review
Issue: #5
Volume: 20
Date: November 5, 1952
Publisher: Credit Section
Country: USA
Language: English

This issue of Review, dated November 5, 1952, is part of a series that has been active since 1947, focusing on flying saucer reports. The publication is facing challenges related to translation and printing costs.

Research Groups and Publications

The issue highlights several UFO research groups. The Amarillo Flying Saucer Sighting Center, headed by John Garbutt, collects and analyzes reports from newspapers and eyewitnesses in the Amarillo and Texas area. The International Flying Saucer Bureau, based in Bridgeport, Connecticut, and led by Al Bender, is another significant group. This bureau caters to sciencefiction and fate readers and publishes a magazine called SPACE REVIEW, which costs 75 cents for four issues and is released approximately quarterly, with the next issue scheduled for January 2, 1953. SPACE REVIEW features articles, sciencefiction news, fiction, and a readers' commentary column, edited by Al Bender and Max Krengel.

The publication urges individuals in various areas to contact these groups to facilitate a more efficient exchange of reports, thereby avoiding duplication of work and ensuring that more important reports, not sufficiently covered in the Review, are shared. It also encourages those interested in starting a new group in their area to reach out, with active readers being given priority consideration. Only groups that contribute by sending in clippings will be listed.

Foreign Language Translators Needed

A critical need identified in this issue is for foreign language translators. While the Review's coverage now extends to most European and South American reports, the process is hindered by the lack of individuals capable of translating these reports. The publication offers free photostats of reports as compensation for translation work. Specific languages requested include German, Swedish, Finnish, Norwegian, French, and Italian.

Printing Information Needed

The costs associated with producing each issue of the Review, including printing and magazine distribution, have risen sharply. The publication is seeking information or knowledge from anyone experienced in cheap printing, magazine distribution, and reprinting newspaper clippings. The project has become a significant time and energy commitment for a single person, and a solution to these logistical and financial problems is necessary to prevent the Review from being discontinued after the next issue. Comments and suggestions from readers on these issues are highly appreciated.

Copyright and Permissions

All material in this issue is copyrighted, and no permission has been granted for reprinting the review.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the organization and dissemination of UFO sighting information. The editorial stance is one of seeking collaboration and efficiency within the UFO research community, emphasizing the importance of shared data and the need for broader linguistic coverage. The publication also highlights the practical challenges of producing such a review, particularly concerning financial and logistical aspects, and actively solicits reader input to address these concerns.